Skip to main content
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) logoLink to Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
. 2018 Mar 28;18(4):1001. doi: 10.3390/s18041001

Direct Printing of Stretchable Elastomers for Highly Sensitive Capillary Pressure Sensors

Wenguang Liu 1, Chaoyi Yan 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC5948908  PMID: 29597265

Abstract

We demonstrate the successful fabrication of highly sensitive capillary pressure sensors using an innovative 3D printing method. Unlike conventional capacitive pressure sensors where the capacitance changes were due to the pressure-induced interspace variations between the parallel plate electrodes, in our capillary sensors the capacitance was determined by the extrusion and extraction of liquid medium and consequent changes of dielectric constants. Significant pressure sensitivity advances up to 547.9 KPa−1 were achieved. Moreover, we suggest that our innovative capillary pressure sensors can adopt a wide range of liquid mediums, such as ethanol, deionized water, and their mixtures. The devices also showed stable performances upon repeated pressing cycles. The direct and versatile printing method combined with the significant performance advances are expected to find important applications in future stretchable and wearable electronics.

Keywords: 3D printing, stretchable electronics, pressure sensor, PDMS, conductive elastomer

1. Introduction

Stretchable electronics represent a new type of soft electronics that can deform into arbitrary shapes and conform to complex non-planar surfaces to achieve unprecedented applications [1,2]. Over the years, many efforts have been devoted to the developments of innovative stretchable electronic devices, ranging from basic stretchable structure and material design [3,4,5,6,7,8] to the demonstration of individual stretchable electronic units [5,6] and to the fabrication of integrated complex stretchable electronic systems [9,10,11] for practical applications. Among them, pressure sensors have received great attention as important interactive electronic devices for future applications, such as human motion detection [12,13] and human-machine interaction [14,15].

Several types of device structures, such as capacitive [6,7,13,14,16,17,18,19,20,21,22], resistive [12,23,24], transistor [20,25,26,27] and optical types [28] have been successfully demonstrated for pressure sensing applications, with capacitive type as the dominant device structure due to its simple device fabrication process, fast response rate and excellent device stability. Most capacitive pressure sensors in previous works employed analogous sensing mechanisms where the applied pressure affects the interspace between the parallel plate electrodes and hence device capacitance. The device performance, especially pressure sensitivity, could be effectively improved through the design of innovative structures for the dielectric layer. For example, Bao group [20] demonstrated the fabrication of inversely templated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) micro-pyramids as dielectric layer between two stretchable carbon nanotube (CNT) electrodes. The pressure sensitivity was successfully improved from 0.02 KPa−1 for unstructured PDMS film to 0.55 KPa−1 for PDMS micro-pyramids. Similar structure designs were extensively employed to improve the pressure sensitivity of pressure sensors in following studies [17,24,29,30].

However, developments of facile and scalable fabrication techniques and further improvements of the sensing performances of pressure sensors are imperative for practical applications. In this report, we employed 3D printing technique to directly print the stretchable conductive inks for capillary pressure sensors. 3D printing can conveniently fabricate complex electrode patterns and greatly simplify the fabrication processes as compared to previous lithographic [8,31] and templated methods [6,18]. Moreover, the capillary pressure sensors in our work employ distinct pressure sensing mechanism where the capacitance variations were induced by the extrusion and extraction of liquid medium within the capillary channel. Unlike the capacitance variations based on interspace changes in previously reported devices, the changes of dielectric medium in our innovative designs leads to significant capacitance variations upon pressing. We achieved an exciting pressure sensitivity of 547.9 KPa−1. The direct and facile printing method we used is a versatile method, which can be readily extended for the fabrication of other stretchable electronic devices for practical applications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of the CNT-PDMS Printable Ink

First, 3 g multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) (Time Nano, Chengdu, China, diameter 5–8 nm, length 10–30 μm, purity > 98%) was added into 50 g ethanol and dispersed using a mechanical homogenizer for 10 min (T10 Ultra-Turrax, IKA, Staufen im Breisgau, Germany). Then 32.7 g PDMS base (Sylgard 184, Dow Corning, Midland, MI, USA) was added into the suspension and mechanically homogenized for 30 min. After this, the solution was heated at 80 °C for 5 h to completely remove the ethanol content. Finally, 3.3 g of PDMS curer was added into the slurry and stirred for 10 min to get the printable ink.

2.2. 3D Printing Process

The capillary electrode patterns were designed using Solidworks 2016 (Waltham, MA, USA). The 3D printing processes were controlled using a commercial software (Cura, Ultimaker, Geldermalsen, The Netherlands) and carried out on a home-build 3D printer with mechanical extrusion rod. A printing nozzle with inner diameter of 0.4 mm was used. Height of the elastomer electrodes were set at 2 mm and the interspace between the two electrodes were 1 mm. The as-printed elastomer electrodes were cured at 80 °C for 1 h.

2.3. Pressure Sensor Assembly and Characterizations

Top and bottom of the elastomer electrodes were sealed using PDMS thin film (0.5 mm thick). Pre-molded PDMS container with injection tubing was used as solution pool and connected to the capillary electrodes. Morphology and microstructures of the elastomer electrodes were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Zeiss Supra, Oberkochen, Germany). The capacitances were measured using a Keysight LCR meter (E4980AL, Agilent Technologie, Palo Alto, CA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

Schematic diagram of the 3D printed capillary pressure sensor is shown in Figure 1a. The serpentine electrodes were designed in Solidworks 2016 and directed printed on temper glass substrate (Figures S1 and S2, Supplementary Materials) using a home-build 3D printer. All related parameters of the conductive elastomer electrodes can be conveniently tuned through software design and directed reflected in the as-printed patterns. The conductive ink was based on CNT/PDMS precursor composite with optimized formulation as demonstrated in our previous report [32,33]. The as-printed elastomer electrodes were cured at 80 °C for 1 h to get the solidified stretchable electrodes. Then the top and bottom surfaces of the electrodes were sealed using bare PDMS to get the capillary sensing channel. A pre-molded PDMS container was attached to the capillary electrodes and used as solution pool to store the liquid medium.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Schematic diagram of the 3D printed capillary pressure sensors; (b) Photograph of the sensor showing soft PDMS solution pool; (c) Cross-sectional SEM image of the conductive elastomer electrode; (d) High-magnification SEM showing the uniform CNT distribution within the PDMS matrix; Structure and sensing mechanism of (e) conventional pressure sensor through the change of interspace between parallel electrodes and (f) our capillary pressure sensors through the change of dielectric medium.

A typical SEM image showing the cross-section of the 3D printed elastomer electrode is shown in Figure 1c. With a nozzle diameter of 0.4 mm and 5-layer design, the printed electrode (as capillary wall) has an average width of 0.8 mm and height of 2 mm. An enlarged view of the electrode cross-section is shown in Figure 1d, where the CNT conductive filler can be found to distribute uniformly within the PDMS elastomer matrix, enabling good conductivity as well as stretchability of the elastomer electrodes.

Note that the sensing mechanism of our pressure sensors are distinct from previous research works. Most capacitive pressures sensors in previous works have standard parallel plate structure as shown in Figure 1e. Stretchable conductive electrodes, such as percolating CNT networks [3,4,5] and embedded Ag nanowire stretchable film [6,7,10,31] were used as the soft electrodes. The capacitance is determined via C = εε0A/d, where ε is the relative dielectric constant, ε0 is the dielectric permittivity of vacuum, A is the overlapping area and d is the vertical distance between the parallel plates. In those conventional designs, pressure was detected via the change of vertical distance d and hence overall capacitance C (Figure 1e). However, the pressure detection is achieved through the change of relative dielectric constant in our innovative structural design (Figure 1f). Upon applying pressure, the solution medium was extruded from the solution pool and partially filled the capillary tube. Significant capacitance changes can be detected due to the abrupt variation of relative dielectric constant ε (1 for air, 24.3 for ethanol at 25 °C).

The sensing behavior of our capillary pressure sensors is shown in Figure 2. Photographs showing the liquid level variations upon pressing and releasing are shown in Figure 2a–c. The liquid medium used is high purity ethanol (>99%) but with 1 wt. % Co(NO3)2·6H2O as dye to make the solution more visible in the photographs (no dye was used for consequent performance testing). Upon pressing, the liquid was extruded from the solution pool into the capillary sensing tube made of conductive elastomers (Figure 2b). The measured capacitance thus increased significantly due to the increase of dielectric constant as discussed earlier. Upon releasing, the extruded solution will automatically and fully retreat into the solution pool due to the intrinsic resilience of the PDMS elastomer. Enlarged views of the liquid levels can be found in Figure S3, Supplementary Materials.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(ac) Photographs of the pressure sensor upon pressing and releasing with dash lines indicating the liquid levels; Relationship between (d) capacitance-frequency and (e) capacitance-time at respective applied pressures; The solution medium used is ethanol (>99%) and the frequency was fixed at 10 KHz in (e).

The relationship between capacitance and frequency at applied pressures of 0 Pa, 30 Pa, 90 Pa and 120 Pa using ethanol as liquid medium are shown in Figure 2d. The frequency of the applied voltage was set within 1 KHz–1 MHz. The capacitance increased significantly at higher pressure since the extruded ethanol filled a larger portion of the capillary tube. For example, at the frequency of 1 KHz, the measured capacitance was 0.08 nF at relaxed state (0 Pa) and increased to 1.50 nF, 3.56 nF and 4.92 nF at the pressures of 30 Pa, 90 Pa and 120 Pa, respectively. There are also significant increases at the high frequency end as can be more clearly viewed in logarithm scale plot (Figure S4, Supplementary Materials). At a certain fixed pressure, the measured capacitance decreases at higher frequency. This can be attributed to the fact that the device capacitance is known to be related to applied alternative current (AC) signals via C ∝ 1/2πf, where f is the frequency. The dynamic sensing behaviors of the pressure sensors are shown in Figure 2e. The capacitance increased abruptly within 1 s when pressure was applied, indicating an excellent response rate. Moreover, the capacitance can fully restore to its initial value when the pressure was released and showed minimum delay due to the elastomer resilience properties as observed in previous reports [20]. The fast response rate is a characteristic property of capacitive pressure sensors as also observed in previous reports [21], making our capillary pressure sensors ideal candidates especially for the effective detections of dynamic pressure variations.

Pressure sensitivity is one of the most important characteristics of pressure sensors and is studied in Figure 3. We performed a more detailed study using ethanol as liquid medium within the pressure range of 0–110 Pa (pressure increase step 10 Pa). The maximum pressure was set at 110 Pa since the capillary tube was fully filled with ethanol at this pressure. The pressure detection range can be effectively tuned by elongating the capillary tube length or design more compact capillary designs, such as bi-spiral patterns as shown in Figure S5, Supplementary Materials. Capacitance change is defined as C/C0, where C is the capacitance at respective applied pressures and C0 is the capacitance at 0 Pa. While a general increasing trend of capacitance at higher pressures was observed, the peak values of capacitance changes C/C0 were observed at the frequency of 9 KHz for all applied pressures (indicated by a dash line in Figure 3a). The plot of capacitance changes (values at 9 KHz) versus pressure is shown in Figure 3b. Relative slower capacitance increases were observed within 0–40 Pa (red circles in Figure 3b, linear fitting slope 101.8 KPa−1) but a larger slope was observed within the pressure range of 40–110 Pa (blue squares in Figure 3b, linear fitting slope 547.9 KPa−1).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) Capacitance change C/C0 versus frequency curves at different applied pressures within 0–110 Pa; (b) Capacitance change C/C0 versus pressure curves and their linear fitting results showing the pressure sensitivity as high as 547.9 KPa−1.

It is worth mentioning that the pressure sensitivity of 547.9 KPa−1 represents a significant advance as compared to previous research works, as summarized in Table 1. For example, Dong et al. [34] reported the design of all-graphene pressure sensor integrated in electronic skin but the pressure sensitivity was only 0.002 KPa−1. Mannsfeld et al. [20] reported the fabrication of a standard conventional parallel-plate capacitive pressure sensor composed of two indium tin oxide on polyethylene terephthalate (ITO-PET) electrodes and an unstructured PDMS dielectric layer. The pressure sensitivity is as low as 0.02 KPa−1. Then the authors designed and fabricated microscale line-structured and pyramid-structured dielectric layers and successfully improved the sensitivity to 0.1 KPa−1 and 0.55 KPa−1, respectively. The micro-pyramid and analogous structures were extensively adopted in many following studies and the sensitivities were further improved through the optimization of micro-pyramid designs [24] and nanoelectrode innovations [11]. For example, Bae et al. [23] successfully improved the sensitivity to 14 KPa−1 through the fabrication of monolayer graphene coated PDMS microdot arrays for pressure sensors. However, most previous works employed the conventional device structure where the capacitance changes were due to the pressure-induced interspace d variations between the parallel plate electrodes (C = εε0A/d). Our innovative 3D printed capillary pressure sensor, on the contrary, employed a distinct concept by relating the pressure detection to solution medium extrusion/extraction in the capillary channel, leading to significant pressure sensitivity improvements. Enhanced pressure sensitivities were observed through the change of dielectric layer contact conditions with electrodes. Park et al. presented flexible capacitive pressure sensors that incorporate micropatterned pyramidal ionic gels to enable sensitivity of 41 KPa−1 [35]. It is also worth mentioning that Pan et al. fabricated an iontronic microdroplet array device consist of an array of nanoliter droplets sandwiched between two polymeric membranes, which achieved a sensitivity of 0.43 nF KPa−1 [36] (note that this is absolute capacitance change ΔC instead of relative capacitance change C/C0 adopted in Table 1); the authors also reported an electrospun ionic fabric utilizing nanofibrous structures achieving a sensitivity of 114 nF KPa−1 [37]. In above-mentioned devices using homogeneous material as the dielectric material, the capacitance only increases 2 times even when the dielectric layer was heavily squeezed to half its original thickness. However, we observed a 47.96 times capacitance increase only at a low pressure of 110 Pa (Figure 3) due to the large dielectric constant changes between ethanol and air as well as the frequency enhancement effect (peak value at 9 KHz). This pressure sensitivity can be further improved through device structure optimizations, such as using thinner capillary channels and more detailed studies are undergoing.

Table 1.

Sensitivities of PDMS-based pressure sensors.

Device Structures Sensitivity/KPa−1 Response Time/s Ref.
All-graphene on PDMS 0.002 <0.2 [33]
PDMS waveguide 0.2 0.3 [28]
Micro-lined and micro-pyramid PDMS 0.55 0.2 [20]
Bioinspired porous structure PDMS 0.63 0.01 [21]
Au-coated PDMS micropillars 2 0.05 [11]
PEDOT:PSS coated PDMS micro-pyramids 4.8 0.2 [24]
Graphene coated PDMS microdot array 14 0.03 [23]
ITO/PET coated ionic gels micro-pyramids 41 0.02 [35]
3D printed PDMS capillary sensor 547.9 <1 This work

Our innovative capillary pressure sensors can adopt different types of solution mediums and can all function properly as shown in Figure 4. Ethanol, DI water and their mixtures were all demonstrated to give analogous pressure sensing performances. Representative dynamic sensing behaviors using ethanol mixed with different volume percent of DI water are shown in Figure 4a. When applying a fixed pressure of 100 Pa, the capacitance increased to 0.41 nF when using pure ethanol as liquid medium. However, the absolute capacitances at pressed state were found to drop to 0.25 nF and 0.17 nF when ethanol was mixed with 5 vol. % and 10 vol. % of DI water, respectively. It is evident that our pressure sensors can work with different types of liquid mediums. It is also interesting to note that the capacitance variations and hence pressure sensitivity depends heavily on the types of liquid medium used as well as the measurement frequency. A complete 3D mapping of the pressure sensitivity versus liquid mediums and frequency will be of great help to optimize the device performances and will be presented in following studies. The device stability was also investigated as shown in Figure 4b. We use pure DI water in this case and tested the sensing stability under 120 Pa and 200 Pa, respectively. The pressure sensor was repeated pressed and released for 500 cycles and the capacitances are very stable showing negligible performance degradations.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) The dynamic capacitance changes at 100 Pa using ethanol with 0%, 5% and 10% DI water as liquid medium; (b) Device stability testing using DI water as liquid medium at 120 Pa and 200 Pa pressures for 500 pressing cycles. The frequency was fixed at 10 KHz for (a,b).

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we demonstrated the successful design and fabrication of highly sensitive capillary pressure sensors. We used an innovative 3D printing method to directly and conveniently print out the designed patterns in software. In conventional parallel plate pressure sensors, the capacitance change was due to the pressure-induced interlayer distance variation. Our devices employed distinct pressure sensing mechanisms where the liquid medium in the solution pool will be extruded into the capillary sensing tube between two conductive elastomer electrodes, leading to significant capacitance changes due to the large dielectric constant variations. Our devices showed excellent pressure sensing behaviors when using ethanol, DI water and their mixtures as liquid mediums. A pressure sensitivity as high as 547.9 KPa−1 was achieved, representing a significant advance over previous studies. The capillary pressure sensors also showed stable performances with negligible performance degradations after 500 pressing cycles. Our innovative device fabrication methods for pressure sensors with significantly improved device performances are expected to find important applications for future stretchable and wearable electronic systems.

Acknowledgments

We thank the NSFC Projects of International Collaboration Project (51761145101), the NSFC program China (51602011), the Guangdong Talents Project, the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, No. 2015CB856505), the Shenzhen Peacock Program (KQTD2014062714543296), the Shenzhen Engineering Laboratory SFG(2016)1592, the Shenzhen Science Technology research grant (JCYJ20160510144254604), Guangdong Key Research Project (No. 2014B090914003, No. 2015B090914002) and Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Shenzhen Science and Technology Plan (ZDSYS20140509094114164).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/4/1001/s1, Schematic illustration and photographs of device fabrication process, liquid levels upon pressing, other device pattern designs, etc.

Author Contributions

W.L. and C.Y. conceived and designed the experiments; W.L. performed the experiments; W.L. and C.Y. analyzed the data; W.L. wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Rogers J.A., Someya T., Huang Y. Materials and mechanics for stretchable electronics. Science. 2010;327:1603–1607. doi: 10.1126/science.1182383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chen D., Pei Q. Electronic muscles and skins: A review of soft sensors and actuators. Chem. Rev. 2017;117:11239–11268. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lipomi D.J., Vosgueritchian M., Tee B.C., Hellstrom S.L., Lee J.A., Fox C.H., Bao Z. Skin-like pressure and strain sensors based on transparent elastic films of carbon nanotubes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011;6:788–792. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Woo S.-J., Kong J.-H., Kim D.-G., Kim J.-M. A thin all-elastomeric capacitive pressure sensor array based on micro-contact printed elastic conductors. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2014;2:4415–4422. doi: 10.1039/C4TC00392F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chen H., Su Z., Song Y., Cheng X., Chen X., Meng B., Song Z., Chen D., Zhang H. Omnidirectional bending and pressure sensor based on stretchable cnt-pu sponge. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017;27:1604434. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201604434. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Joo Y., Byun J., Seong N., Ha J., Kim H., Kim S., Kim T., Im H., Kim D., Hong Y. Silver nanowire-embedded pdms with a multiscale structure for a highly sensitive and robust flexible pressure sensor. Nanoscale. 2015;7:6208–6215. doi: 10.1039/C5NR00313J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.You B., Han C.J., Kim Y., Ju B.-K., Kim J.-W. A wearable piezocapacitive pressure sensor with a single layer of silver nanowire-based elastomeric composite electrodes. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2016;4:10435–10443. doi: 10.1039/C6TA02449A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tabatabai A., Fassler A., Usiak C., Majidi C. Liquid-phase gallium-indium alloy electronics with microcontact printing. Langmuir. 2013;29:6194–6200. doi: 10.1021/la401245d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhao X., Hua Q., Yu R., Zhang Y., Pan C. Flexible, stretchable and wearable multifunctional sensor array as artificial electronic skin for static and dynamic strain mapping. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2015;1:1500142. doi: 10.1002/aelm.201500142. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang J., Jiu J., Nogi M., Sugahara T., Nagao S., Koga H., He P., Suganuma K. A highly sensitive and flexible pressure sensor with electrodes and elastomeric interlayer containing silver nanowires. Nanoscale. 2015;7:2926–2932. doi: 10.1039/C4NR06494A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Park H., Yu R.J., Yun J., Hong S.Y., Jin S., Lee S.J., Zi G., Ha J.S. Stretchable array of highly sensitive pressure sensors consisting of polyaniline nanofibers and au-coated polydimethylsiloxane micropillars. ACS Nano. 2015;9:9974–9985. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b03510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yan C., Wang J., Kang W., Cui M., Wang X., Foo C.Y., Chee K.J., Lee P.S. Highly stretchable piezoresistive graphene-nanocellulose nanopaper for strain sensors. Adv. Mater. 2014;26:2022–2027. doi: 10.1002/adma.201304742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yao S., Zhu Y. Wearable multifunctional sensors using printed stretchable conductors made of silver nanowires. Nanoscale. 2014;6:2345–2352. doi: 10.1039/c3nr05496a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lee J., Kwon H., Seo J., Shin S., Koo J.H., Pang C., Son S., Kim J.H., Jang Y.H., Kim D.E., et al. Conductive fiber-based ultrasensitive textile pressure sensor for wearable electronics. Adv. Mater. 2015;27:2433–2439. doi: 10.1002/adma.201500009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ling S., Zhang Q., Kaplan D.L., Omenetto F., Buehler M.J., Qin Z. Printing of stretchable silk membranes for strain measurements. Lab Chip. 2016;16:2459–2466. doi: 10.1039/C6LC00519E. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chhetry A., Yoon H., Park J.Y. A flexible and highly sensitive capacitive pressure sensor based on conductive fibers with a microporous dielectric for wearable electronics. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2017;5:10068–10076. doi: 10.1039/C7TC02926H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lee K., Lee J., Kim G., Kim Y., Kang S., Cho S., Kim S., Kim J.K., Lee W., Kim D.E., et al. Rough-surface-enabled capacitive pressure sensors with 3d touch capability. Small. 2017;13:1700368. doi: 10.1002/smll.201700368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li T., Luo H., Qin L., Wang X., Xiong Z., Ding H., Gu Y., Liu Z., Zhang T. Flexible capacitive tactile sensor based on micropatterned dielectric layer. Small. 2016;12:5042–5048. doi: 10.1002/smll.201600760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhuo B., Chen S., Zhao M., Guo X. High sensitivity flexible capacitive pressure sensor using polydimethylsiloxane elastomer dielectric layer micro-structured by 3-D printed mold. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 2017;5:219–223. doi: 10.1109/JEDS.2017.2683558. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mannsfeld S.C., Tee B.C., Stoltenberg R.M., Chen C.V., Barman S., Muir B.V., Sokolov A.N., Reese C., Bao Z. Highly sensitive flexible pressure sensors with microstructured rubber dielectric layers. Nat. Mater. 2010;9:859–864. doi: 10.1038/nmat2834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kang S., Lee J., Lee S., Kim S., Kim J.-K., Algadi H., Al-Sayari S., Kim D.-E., Kim D., Lee T. Highly sensitive pressure sensor based on bioinspired porous structure for real-time tactile sensing. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2016;2:1600356. doi: 10.1002/aelm.201600356. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Takahashi T., Suzuki M., Iwamoto S., Aoyagi S. Capacitive tactile sensor based on dielectric oil displacement out of a parylene dome into surrounding channels. Micromachines. 2012;3:270–278. doi: 10.3390/mi3020270. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bae G.Y., Pak S.W., Kim D., Lee G., Kim do H., Chung Y., Cho K. Linearly and highly pressure-sensitive electronic skin based on a bioinspired hierarchical structural array. Adv. Mater. 2016;28:5300–5306. doi: 10.1002/adma.201600408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Choong C.L., Shim M.B., Lee B.S., Jeon S., Ko D.S., Kang T.H., Bae J., Lee S.H., Byun K.E., Im J., et al. Highly stretchable resistive pressure sensors using a conductive elastomeric composite on a micropyramid array. Adv. Mater. 2014;26:3451–3458. doi: 10.1002/adma.201305182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sun Q., Kim D.H., Park S.S., Lee N.Y., Zhang Y., Lee J.H., Cho K., Cho J.H. Transparent, low-power pressure sensor matrix based on coplanar-gate graphene transistors. Adv. Mater. 2014;26:4735–4740. doi: 10.1002/adma.201400918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yeo S.Y., Park S., Yi Y.J., Kim D.H., Lim J.A. Highly sensitive flexible pressure sensors based on printed organic transistors with centro-apically self-organized organic semiconductor microstructures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017;9:42996–43003. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b15960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Someya T., Sekitani T., Iba S., Kato Y., Kawaguchi H., Sakurai T. A large-area, flexible pressure sensor matrix with organic field-effect transistors for artificial skin applications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:9966–9970. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401918101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ramuz M., Tee B.C., Tok J.B., Bao Z. Transparent, optical, pressure-sensitive artificial skin for large-area stretchable electronics. Adv. Mater. 2012;24:3223–3227. doi: 10.1002/adma.201200523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lee B.-Y., Kim J., Kim H., Kim C., Lee S.-D. Low-cost flexible pressure sensor based on dielectric elastomer film with micro-pores. Sens. Actuators A. 2016;240:103–109. doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2016.01.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tee B.C.K., Chortos A., Dunn R.R., Schwartz G., Eason E., Bao Z. Tunable flexible pressure sensors using microstructured elastomer geometries for intuitive electronics. Adv. Func. Mater. 2014;24:5427–5434. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201400712. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yan C., Wang J., Wang X., Kang W., Cui M., Foo C.Y., Lee P.S. An intrinsically stretchable nanowire photodetector with a fully embedded structure. Adv. Mater. 2014;26:943–950. doi: 10.1002/adma.201304226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wei H., Li K., Liu W.G., Meng H., Zhang P.X., Yan C.Y. 3D printing of free-standing stretchable electrodes with tunable structure and stretchability. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2017;19:1700341. doi: 10.1002/adem.201700341. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Li K., Wei H., Liu W., Meng H., Zhang P., Yan C. 3D printed stretchable capacitive sensors for highly sensitive tactile and electrochemical sensing. Nanotechnology. 2018;29:185501. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/aaafa5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ho D.H., Sun Q., Kim S.Y., Han J.T., Kim D.H., Cho J.H. Stretchable and multimodal all graphene electronic skin. Adv. Mater. 2016;28:2601–2608. doi: 10.1002/adma.201505739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cho S.H., Lee S.W., Yu S., Kim H., Chang S., Kang D., Hwang I., Kang H.S., Jeong B., Kim E.H., et al. Micropatterned pyramidal ionic gels for sensing broad-range pressures with high sensitivity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017;9:10128–10135. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b00398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nie B., Li R., Brandt J.D., Pan T. Iontronic microdroplet array for flexible ultrasensitive tactile sensing. Lab Chip. 2014;14:1107–1116. doi: 10.1039/c3lc50994j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li R., Si Y., Zhu Z., Guo Y., Zhang Y., Pan N., Sun G., Pan T. Supercapacitive iontronic nanofabric sensing. Adv. Mater. 2017;29:1700253. doi: 10.1002/adma.201700253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES