A Multicenter Retrospective Comparison of Sequential versus Sandwich Chemoradiotherapy for Stage IE-IIE Extranodal Natural Killer/T-Cell Lymphoma, Nasal Type

Abstract

Background: Chemotherapy and radiotherapy are critical for treating early-stage extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENKTL); however, the optimal therapy sequence remains unclear. Therefore, we performed this study to compare the efficacy of L-asparaginase/pegaspargase-based sequential versus sandwich chemoradiotherapy for patients newly diagnosed with stage IE-IIE ENKTL.

Methods: Patients were categorized into sequential (N = 111) and sandwich (N = 104) groups. Chemotherapy regimens included GELOX, SMILE, and VLP. The median radiotherapy dose was 55.0 Gy (range, 40.0-63.0 Gy). Adverse events, treatment responses, and survival outcomes were analyzed.

Results: Patients' clinical characteristics were largely comparable between the 2 groups; however, the sandwich group comprised a larger number of Ann Arbor stage IIE patients. Local invasion was the most significant predictor of overall survival (OS); local invasion and Ann Arbor stage were significant predictors of progression-free survival (PFS). There were no significant differences in the complete response rate (85.6% vs. 89.4%, p = 0.396), 3-year OS (77.5% vs. 80.8%, p = 0.636), or 3-year PFS rates (74.8% vs. 76.9%, p = 0.806) in the sequential vs. sandwich groups, respectively. The incidence of grade 3/4 hematological toxicities was higher in the sandwich group than in the sequential group (27.9% vs. 15.3%, respectively, p = 0.025). The response rates and survival outcomes in stage IE and IIE patients did not differ between sequential and sandwich groups.

Conclusions: In the era of L-asparaginase/pegaspargase, both sequential and sandwich chemoradiotherapy are safe and similarly effective in patients with newly diagnosed stage IE-IIE ENKTL.

Introduction

Extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENKTL) is a form of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with a low incidence and a geographical predilection to Asia and Latin America ¹. ENKTL commonly involves the nasal and paranasal area as well as the upper respiratory and digestive tracts. Approximately two-thirds of cases are stage IE-IIE ^{2, 3}. The disease has a poor prognosis and an aggressive clinical course; the 5-year OS rate of patients with early-stage ENKTL is reportedly 38-73% ^4-6.

For patients with early-stage ENKTL, radiotherapy alone leads to CR rates of 50-100% ^{4, 7-9}, but also carries a high risk of systemic failure in 25-40% of patients with limited-stage disease ⁷. This suggests that radiotherapy should be combined with chemotherapy to reduce the incidence of distant recurrence.

ENKTL is insensitive to traditional anthracycline-based regimens, as more than 60% of patients become resistant to such therapies ^10-13. The high expression of multi-drug resistance (MDR) genes in ENKTL may lead to poor responses to the conventional CHOP regimen ¹⁴. The addition of L-asparaginase/pegaspargase, which is not influenced by MDR genes, has improved the survival rates of patients with ENKTL ^{15, 16}. L-asparaginase-based regimens have emerged as potential standard treatments for this condition ¹⁷; some of these regimens have achieved CR rates of 40-60% ^18-20.

Current effective therapeutic strategies for stage IE-IIE ENKTL include concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by chemotherapy, sequential chemoradiotherapy, and sandwich chemoradiotherapy ²¹. Several phase II single-arm clinical trials have demonstrated the promising effects of these treatment modalities. The CR rates following CCRT, sequential chemoradiotherapy, and sandwich chemoradiotherapy are 80-87%, 91-100%, and 74-81%, respectively; the corresponding 5-year OS rates are 72-86%, 86-89%, and 64-85%, respectively ^22-30.

Although chemotherapy and radiotherapy are essential for treating early-stage ENKTL, no prospective studies to compare the efficacy of L-asparaginase-based sequential chemoradiotherapy with sandwich chemoradiotherapy have been performed, and the optimal sequence of chemotherapy and radiotherapy has yet to be determined. Therefore, we conducted this multicenter retrospective analysis to compare the objective response rates and survival outcomes between these 2 treatment modalities in patients with ENKTL.

Materials and Methods

Patients

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 215 treatment-naïve patients with stage IE-IIE ENKTL who attended the Hunan Cancer Hospital, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University or Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University between 2010 and 2017. ENKTL was diagnosed according to the current World Health Organization classification ^{31, 32}. All patients underwent routine blood examinations; blood biochemistry; bone marrow smear and biopsy; CT or MRI of the involved areas; a CT scan of the neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis; and/or whole-body PET/CT prior to treatment.

Patient characteristics including age, gender, ECOG performance status, Ann Arbor stage, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, plasma EBV DNA level, B symptoms, PINK and PINK-E scores, local invasion, chemotherapy regimens, and radiotherapy data were collected. Local tumor invasion was defined as occurring when tumors spanned neighboring structures (such as the nasal skin, paranasal sinus, orbit, and hard or soft palate) by contiguous spreading. Stage and risk stratification were determined according to the Ann Arbor stage ^{33, 34} and PINK/PINK-E scores ³⁵, respectively. Early-stage, limited-stage, and localized ENKTL referred to Ann Arbor stages IE or IIE.

The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) pathological diagnosis of ENKTL, (2) newly diagnosed patients, (3) Ann Arbor stage IE-IIE, (4) underwent ≥1 cycle of L-asparaginase-based chemotherapy, and (5) underwent radiotherapy. Patients were excluded if they had coexisting malignant tumors, severe organ dysfunction, or any concomitant medical condition that may have caused poor compliance with the research protocol.

All participants provided informed written consent. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Cancer Institute and the Ethics Committee of each of the above hospitals. This research was conducted in accordance with the 2008 Declaration of Helsinki.

Treatment and response criteria

All patients were treated with combined L-asparaginase/pegaspargase-based chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The treatment modalities were categorized into 2 groups based on the timing of radiotherapy in relation to the chemotherapy: the sequential group (induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy, or radiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy) and the sandwich group (induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy, and then by consolidation chemotherapy). The chemotherapy regimens consisted of GELOX, SMILE, and VLP; the regimens and dosages are listed in Table 1. The response criteria were evaluated according to the Lugano Response Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma ³⁴. Tumor responses were assessed through physical examinations, nasopharyngoscopy, CT, MRI, and/or PET/CT every 2 cycles during chemotherapy and 1 month after radiotherapy.

Table 1.

Chemotherapy regimens

Regimen	Drugs	Dosage
GELOX	gemcitabine	800 mg/m2, d1 and d8
	oxaliplatin	85 mg/m2, d1
	L-asparaginase/pegaspargase	5000 U/m2, d1-7/2500 IU/m2, d1
SMILE	dexamethasone	15 mg, d1-7
	methotrexate	60 mg/m2, d1
	ifosfamide	1.5 g/m2, d2-4
	L-asparaginase/pegaspargase	5000 U/m2, d1-7/2500 IU/m2, d1
	etoposide	100 mg/m2, d2-4
VLP	vincristine	2 mg, d1
	L-asparaginase/pegaspargase	5000 U/m2, d1-7/2500 IU/m2, d1
	prednisone	100 mg/d, d1-5

Treatment-related toxicity was evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria (version 3) ³⁶.

Statistical analyses

OS was calculated from the date of diagnosis to that of death or the last follow-up date. PFS was defined as the interval between the date of diagnosis and the date of disease progression, relapse, or death by any cause. Differences in patient clinical characteristics, response rates, recurrence rates, and mortality rates between the sequential and sandwich groups were evaluated using the Chi-square or Kruskal-Wallis test. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test. Prognostic factors for OS and PFS were analyzed using Cox regression analysis. All statistical analyses were used SPSS 24.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient characteristics

Between 2010 and 2017, a total of 215 patients with stage IE-IIE ENKTL were enrolled in this retrospective study. These patients were predominantly male (the male: female ratio was 2.6:1). The median patient age was 44 (range, 14-77) years. In terms of treatment, 111 patients were in the sequential group and 104 in the sandwich group. Seventy-eight patients in the sequential group received chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy (CT+RT) while 33 received radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy (RT+CT).

The baseline clinical characteristics, including age (p = 0.068), gender (p = 0.869), ECOG performance status (p = 0.523), LDH levels (p = 0.735), B symptoms (p = 0.805), PINK scores (p = 0.190), PINK-E scores (p = 0.449), and local invasion (p = 0.317), were largely comparable between the 2 groups. However, significantly more patients with Ann Arbor stage IIE disease were included in the sandwich group (32.7%) than in the sequential group (19.8%; p = 0.032) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Patient characteristics

Characteristic	Sequential Group	Sandwich Group	p	All n (%)
Gender			0.869
Male	80 (72.1)	76 (73.1)		156 (72.6)
Female	31 (27.9)	28 (26.9)		59 (27.4)
Age			0.068
>60	13 (11.7)	5 (4.8)		18 (8.4)
≤60	98 (88.3)	99 (95.2)		197 (91.6)
ECOG			0.523
0-1	110 (99.1)	102 (98.1)		212 (98.6)
2-4	1 (0.9)	2 (1.9)		3 (1.4)
Ann Arbor stage			0.032
IE	89 (80.2)	70 (67.3)		159 (74.0)
IIE	22 (19.8)	34 (32.7)		56 (26.0)
LDH			0.735
Elevated	30 (27.0)	26 (25.0)		56 (26.0)
Normal	81 (73.0)	78 (75.0)		159 (74.0)
B symptoms			0.805
Present	68 (61.3)	62 (59.6)		130 (60.5)
Absent	43 (38.7)	42 (40.4)		85 (39.5)
PINK			0.190
Low-risk	94 (84.7)	96 (92.3)		190 (88.4)
Intermediate-risk	16 (14.4)	7 (6.7)		23 (10.7)
High-risk	1 (0.9)	1 (1.0)		2 (0.9)
PINK-E			0.449
Low-risk	45 (91.8)	42 (93.4)		87 (92.5)
Intermediate-risk	4 (8.2)	2 (4.4)		6 (6.4)
High-risk	0 (0.0)	1 (2.2)		1 (1.1)
Local invasion			0.317
Present	62 (55.9)	51 (49.0)		113 (52.6)
Absent	49 (44.1)	53 (51.0)		102 (47.4)
Chemotherapy regimen			0.697
GELOX	84 (75.7)	82 (78.8)		166 (77.2)
SMILE	11 (9.9)	11 (10.6)		22 (10.2)
VLP	16 (14.4)	11 (10.6)		27 (12.6)

Primary tumor sites included the nasal cavities (N = 159; sequential group N = 79 and sandwich group N = 80), upper aerodigestive tract (N = 52; sequential group N = 29 and sandwich group N = 23), and non-upper aerodigestive tract (N = 4; sequential group N = 3 and sandwich group N = 1). Plasma EBV-DNA levels were tested in 94 patients and were detectable in 45 (22 in the sequential group and 23 in the sandwich group).

Adverse events

The majority of patients tolerated any treatment-related adverse events that occurred, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Neutropenia and radiation-induced mucositis were the most common hematological and non-hematological adverse events, respectively. The incidences of grade 1/2 hematological toxicities and grade 1/2 and 3/4 non-hematological toxicities did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. However, the incidence of grade 3/4 hematological toxicities was significantly higher in the sandwich group than in the sequential group (27.9% vs. 15.3%, p = 0.025) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Adverse events

	Grade 1-2			Grade 3-4
Adverse events	Sequential group	Sandwich group	p	Sequential group	Sandwich group	p
Hematological	73 (65.8%)	68 (65.4%)	0.953	17 (15.3%)	29 (27.9%)	0.025
Neutropenia	41 (36.9%)	47 (45.2%)	0.219	17 (15.3%)	27 (26.0%)	0.053
Anemia	50 (45.0%)	47 (45.2%)	0.983	2 (1.8%)	2 (1.9%)	0.948
Thrombocytopenia	17 (15.3%)	13 (12.5%)	0.552	6 (5.4%)	5 (4.8%)	0.842
Non-hematological	60 (54.1%)	57 (54.8%)	0.912	21 (18.9%)	18 (17.3%)	0.759
Nausea/Vomiting	35 (31.5%)	41 (39.4%)	0.226	6 (5.4%)	8 (7.7%)	0.497
Transaminase elevation	47 (42.3%)	42 (40.4%)	0.771	4 (3.6%)	2 (1.9%)	0.455
Radio-mucositis	37 (33.3%)	35 (33.7%)	0.960	12 (10.8%)	12 (11.5%)	0.866
Radio-dermatitis	16 (14.4%)	22 (21.2%)	0.195	3 (2.7%)	2 (1.9%)	0.705

Treatment responses

The median radiotherapy dose for both the sequential and sandwich groups was 55.0 Gy (ranges, 40.0-63.0 and 50.0-63.0 Gy, respectively). All patients received a median of 4 (range, 1-8) cycles of chemotherapy. In the sequential group, 84 patients (75.7%) were treated with the GELOX regimen (1-7 cycles), 11 (9.9%) with the SMILE regimen (2-8 cycles), and 16 (14.4%) with the VLP regimen (1-6 cycles). In the sandwich group, 82 patients (78.8%) were treated with the GELOX regimen (2-6 cycles), 11 (10.6%) with the SMILE regimen (3-7 cycles), and 11 (10.6%) with the VLP regimen (2-6 cycles). The proportions of patients receiving each regimen were balanced between the 2 groups.

Across the entire cohort, CR, PR, and PD were observed in 188 (87.4%), 14 (6.5%), and 13 (6.1%) patients, respectively, after the completion of treatment. After the initial chemotherapy, CR, PR, SD, and PD were observed in 53 (47.7%), 56 (50.5%), 1 (0.9%), and 1 (0.9%) patient(s), respectively, in the sequential group. Following sequential chemoradiotherapy, CR, PR, and PD were observed in 95 (85.6%), 7 (6.3%), and 9 (8.1%) patients, respectively. Forty-three patients showed a change from PR to CR, 1 from SD to CR, and 1 from PD to CR. Moreover, 3 patients showed a change from CR to PD and 6 from PR to PD. The remaining 57 patients maintained the initial response. In the sandwich group, CR and PR were observed in 39 (37.5%) and 65 (62.5%) patients, respectively, after the initial chemotherapy. Following sandwich chemoradiotherapy, CR, PR, and PD were observed in 93 (89.5%), 7 (6.7%), and 4 (3.8%) patients, respectively. Thirty-eight patients showed a change from PR to CR and 1 from PR to SD. The remaining 65 patients maintained the initial response. CR rates did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (85.6% vs. 89.4% for the sequential and sandwich groups, respectively; p = 0.396).

Treatment failure

Thirty-seven patients (sequential group N = 17 and sandwich group N = 20) experienced recurrence during the follow-up period. Nineteen patients developed regional recurrence (sequential group N = 8 and sandwich group N = 11) and 18 developed distant recurrence (sequential group N = 9 and sandwich group N = 9). There was no significant difference in recurrence rates between the sequential and sandwich groups (15.3% vs. 19.2%, respectively, p = 0.447).

Survival and prognosis

The median follow-up time for all patients was 35.1 (range, 2.6-88.6) months as of October 2017. The median follow-up time for the sequential and sandwich groups were 33.1 (range, 2.6-78.9) and 38.4 (range, 3.6-88.6) months, respectively. The mortality rates were 22.5% (N = 25 patients) and 23.1% (N = 24 patients), respectively, and were comparable between the 2 treatment modalities (p = 0.923).

The 3-year OS and PFS rates for all patients combined were 79.1% and 75.8%, respectively (Figure 1 A-B). The 3-year OS rates for the sequential and sandwich groups were 77.5% and 80.8%, respectively; the 3-year PFS rates were 74.8% and 76.9%, respectively (Figure 2A-B). No significant differences in the 3-year OS or PFS rates were observed between the 2 groups (p = 0.636 and p = 0.806, respectively).

Figure 1.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves for all patients. A) Overall survival; the 3-year rate was 79.1%. B) Progression-free survival; the 3-year rate was 75.8%.

Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves plotted according to treatment modality. A) Overall survival; the 3-year rates in the sequential and sandwich groups were 77.5% and 80.8%, respectively (p = 0.636). B) Progression-free survival; the 3-year rates in the sequential and sandwich groups were 74.8% and 76.9%, respectively (p = 0.806).

On univariate analysis, local invasion adversely affected OS, while Ann Arbor stage IE was associated with a favorable OS (Figures 3A and 4A). On multivariate analysis, local invasion (HR: 0.246, 95% CI: 0.122-0.494; p < 0.001) was the most significant predictor of shorter OS (Table 4).

Figure 3.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves in patients with (present) and without (absent) local invasion. A) Overall survival; the 3-year rates in the present and absent groups were 68.1% and 91.2%, respectively (p < 0.001). B) Progression-free survival; the 3-year rates in the present and absent groups were 64.6% and 88.2, respectively (p < 0.001).

Figure 4.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves in patients with Ann Arbor stage IE and IIE extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type. A) Overall survival; the 3-year rates in patients with stage IE and stage IIE disease were 83.0% and 67.9%, respectively (p = 0.029). B) Progression-free survival; the 3-year rates in patients with stage IE and stage IIE disease were 80.5% and 62.5%, respectively (p = 0.012).

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate analyses for factors affecting survival outcomes

Clinical factor	Overall survival				Progression-free survival
	Univariate		Multivariate		Univariate		Multivariate
	p	HR (95%CI)	p	HR (95%CI)	p	HR (95%CI)	p	HR (95%CI)
Female	0.061	0.485 (0.227-1.035)			0.081	0.544 (0.274-1.077)
Age ≤ 60	0.088	0.498 (0.224-1.109)			0.055	0.481 (0.227-1.017)
ECOG 0-1	0.476	0.487 (0.067-3.531)			0.546	0.544 (0.075-3.934)
Ann Arbor stage IIE	0.029	1.892 (1.058-3.385)			0.012	1.982 (1.153-3.407)	0.048	1.732 (1.004-2.987)
Normal LDH	0.811	0.927 (0.499-1.723)			0.777	0.920 (0.515-1.643)
Absent B symptoms	0.876	0.955 (0.538-1.697)			0.975	0.991 (0.580-1.695)
PINK Intermediate-risk	0.165	1.711 (0.802-3.650)			0.140	1.713 (0.839-3.498)
PINK-E Intermediate-risk	0.249	2.425 (0.537-10.951)			0.285	2.265 (0.507-10.122)
Absent local invasion	<0.001	0.233 (0.116-0.467)	<0.001	0.246 (0.122-0.494)	<0.001	0.299 (0.163-0.548)	<0.001	0.317 (0.172-0.583)
Sandwich chemoradiotherapy	0.636	1.070 (0.808-1.417)			0.806	1.033 (0.795-1.343)

Furthermore, univariate analysis revealed that local invasion was associated with poorer PFS, while Ann Arbor stage IE was associated with a favorable PFS (Figures 3B and 4B). On multivariate analysis, local invasion (HR: 0.317, 95% CI: 0.172-0.583; p < 0.001) and Ann Arbor stage IIE (HR: 1.732, 95% CI: 1.004-2.987; p = 0.048) were the most significant predictors of shorter PFS (Table 4).

Subgroup analysis

Among the clinical characteristics examined, only Ann Arbor stage was not balanced between the 2 groups, which is important because Ann Arbor stage notably affected the patients' prognoses. Therefore, we subsequently performed a subgroup analysis of the Ann Arbor stage. Regardless of stage IE or IIE, clinical characteristics between the sequential and sandwich groups were balanced (Table S1 and S2). In stage IE patients, the rates of CR, recurrence, 3-year OS, and 3-year PFS in the sequential and sandwich groups were 88.8% vs. 91.4% (p = 0.579), 13.5% vs. 17.1% (p = 0.522), 80.9% vs. 85.7% (p = 0.637), and 79.8% vs. 81.4% (p = 0.991), respectively. In stage IIE patients, these rates were 72.7% vs. 85.3% (p = 0.248), 22.7% vs. 23.5% (p = 0.945), 63.6% vs. 70.6% (p = 0.497), and 54.5% vs. 67.6% (p = 0.356), respectively. Overall, there were no significant differences in objective responses rates and survival outcomes between the 2 groups regardless of stage IE or IIE disease.

Additional analysis was performed to compare the efficacy of RT+CT to that of CT+RT. The clinical features of these 2 groups were balanced (Table S3). In the RT+CT group, the initial radiotherapy achieved a CR rate of 66.7% (N = 22 patients); in contrast, the CR rate after the initial chemotherapy in the CT+RT group was only 35.9% (N = 28). However, the CR rates after completion of chemoradiotherapy were not significantly different between the 2 groups (90.9% vs. 83.3% for the RT+CT and CT+RT groups, respectively; p = 0.299). The rates of recurrence, 3-year OS, and 3-year PFS also did not differ between the RT+CT and CT+RT groups: 15.2% vs. 15.4% (p = 0.975), 81.8% vs. 75.6% (p = 0.291), and 78.8% vs. 73.1% (p = 0.374), respectively. Taken together, the therapeutic responses and survival outcomes were comparable between the 2 groups.

Discussion

Our study revealed local invasion to be the most significant predictor of poor OS, while both local invasion and Ann Arbor stage IIE are the most significant predictors of poor PFS. For all patients combined, the CR rate as well as the 3-year OS and PFS rates did not significantly differ between the sequential and sandwich groups. Moreover, the response rates and survival outcomes were not significantly different for patients with stage IE and IIE disease between the chemoradiotherapy modalities. Our findings suggest that, as long as radiotherapy and chemotherapy are used in combination, the sequence of treatment may not influence the therapeutic efficacy and survival outcomes in patients with localized ENKTL.

Currently, there are no standard treatment strategies for early-stage ENKTL. CHOP and CHOP-like regimens have proved to be ineffective for ENKTL patients with high recurrence rates and short survival times ^{10, 11, 13}. Furthermore, several studies ^37-39 have demonstrated that L-asparaginase/pegaspargase-based regimens are superior to traditional CHOP or CHOP-like regimens in terms of response rates and survival outcomes. The recommended treatment for limited-stage ENKTL is radiotherapy combined with L-asparaginase/pegaspargase-based chemotherapy. A prospective open-label controlled trial recruited 427 ENKTL patients, of whom 202 received chemoradiotherapy (using cyclophosphamide + methotrexate + etoposide + dexamethasone), 109 received radiotherapy alone, and 116 received the aforementioned chemotherapy regimen alone. Chemoradiotherapy significantly enhanced the CR rate compared to radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone (91% vs. 69% vs. 59%, respectively; p < 0.01), as it did the 5-year OS rate (86% vs. 64% vs. 45%, respectively; p < 0.001) ²⁷. A retrospective cohort study of 33 patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (using L-asparaginase + dexamethasone + cisplatin + etoposide + ifosfamide) and 45 patients treated with radiotherapy alone found that the CR rate was higher using chemoradiotherapy than radiotherapy alone (90.9% vs. 77.8%, respectively; p = 0.124), as was the 5-year OS rate (82% vs. 49%, respectively; p < 0.001) ²⁶. In our current study, we specifically investigated the sequence and appropriate timing of the radiotherapy and chemotherapy combinations.

Kwong et al. ⁴⁰ conducted an international multicenter retrospective cohort study comparing sequential chemoradiotherapy to CCRT in patients with early-stage ENKTL. In their study, 54 patients received sequential chemoradiotherapy (chemotherapy + radiotherapy) and 190 received CCRT (CCRT ± chemotherapy); none received anthracycline-containing regimens. No significant differences in the CR, PFS, and OS rates were observed between the sequential chemoradiotherapy and CCRT groups. Additionally, Moon et al. ⁴¹ enrolled 158 stage IE-IIE patients treated with non-anthracycline-based regimens, of whom 61 received sequential chemoradiotherapy (chemotherapy + radiotherapy) and 55 received CCRT (CCRT + chemotherapy). The CR and 5-year OS rates did not differ between the sequential chemoradiotherapy and CCRT groups (82.0% vs. 74.5%, respectively, p = 0.334; and 77.7 ± 5.5% vs. 68.9 ± 6.8%, respectively, p = 0.234). These findings indicate that both sequential chemoradiotherapy and CCRT are effective in treating early-stage ENKTL and produce similar outcomes. Consistent with these studies, our own investigation showed that scheduling chemotherapy and radiotherapy in sequential vs. sandwich routines did not affect the survival outcomes of patients with localized ENKTL. In contrast, another retrospective cohort study conducted by Cao et al. ⁴² showed that CCRT was associated with a better survival outcome than sequential chemoradiotherapy in limited-stage patients. These conflicting results may be attributable to the fact that patients received less effective CHOP or CHOP-like regimens in Cao et al.'s study. CCRT increases tumor sensitivity to the CHOP regimen, rendering it more effective than sequential chemoradiotherapy. The regimens used in our study have been shown to be more effective than CHOP or CHOP-like regimens for treating ENKTL. Consequently, the radiotherapy scheduling sequence (before, after, or in between chemotherapy) did not significantly impact the outcome.

Treatment-related adverse events were generally consistent in patients undergoing the sequential and sandwich groups, with the exception that grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were slightly more common in the sandwich group. Both sequential and sandwich chemoradiotherapy regimens were tolerated for the treatment of early-stage ENKTL.

Several studies ^43-45 have identified local invasion as the most significant factor related to poor survival. Kim et al. ⁴³ reported that the presence of local tumor invasion predicted an inferior CR rate and poor survival outcomes in patients with stage IE-IIE ENKTL of the upper aerodigestive tract. Consistent with these findings, our study found that local invasion (i.e., tumors invading adjacent bone, skin, and soft tissues) was the most significant predictor of poorer OS and PFS rates. The PINK and PINK-E scoring systems were proposed by Kim et al. ³⁵ in 2016 as a prognostic index for ENKTL patients receiving non-anthracycline-containing regimens. The PINK model comprises 4 independent risk factors: >60 years of age, advanced-stage disease, distant lymph node invasion, and non-nasal type disease. The PINK-E (comprising the 4 independent risk factors of PINK combined with pretreatment plasma EBV-DNA copy number) also predicts survival. In their study, the 3-year OS rates in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were 81%, 62%, and 25% using the PINK model, and 81%, 55%, and 28% using the PINK-E model, respectively. Our results showed that the 3-year OS rates of both the low- and intermediate-risk groups were consistent with those of Kim et al. ³⁵; however, PINK and PINK-E had no predictive significance for survival outcomes on multivariate analysis. This may be due to the limited number of elderly patients (aged >60 years) (N = 18; 8.4%), a lack of distant lymph node invasion (N = 2; 0.9%), and the fact that baseline EBV-DNA data were unavailable for >50% of the patients (N = 121).

Our study was a multi-center investigation; however, there were certain limitations in this study. It was a retrospective analysis comprising a relatively small sample size; moreover, patients received non-uniform chemotherapy regimens and were administered varying radiotherapy dosages.

In conclusion, our results showed that, in the era of L-asparaginase/pegaspargase, the timing and sequence of chemotherapy and radiotherapy may not affect the therapeutic responses or survival outcomes in newly diagnosed patients with stage IE-IIE ENKTL as long as both are used in combination. Future large-scale, prospective, multicenter studies are required to validate these findings.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary tables.

Abbreviations

ENKTL

extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type

CR

complete response

MDR

multi-drug resistance

CHOP

cyclophosphamide, anthracycline, vincristine, and prednisone

CCRT

concurrent chemoradiotherapy

CT

computed tomography

MRI

magnetic resonance imaging

PET

positron emission tomography

ECOG

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

LDH

lactate dehydrogenase

EBV

Epstein-Barr virus

PINK

prognostic index for natural killer/T-cell lymphoma

GELOX

gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and L-asparaginase/pegaspargase

SMILE

dexamethasone, methotrexate, ifosfamide, L-asparaginase/pegaspargase, and etoposide

VLP

vincristine, L-asparaginase/pegaspargase, and prednisone

OS

overall survival

PFS

progression-free survival

PR

partial response

CT+RT

chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy

RT+CT

radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy

PD

progressive disease

SD

stable disease

HR

hazard ratio

CI

confidence interval.