Abstract
Only a handful of materials are well-established in three-dimensional (3D) printing and well-accepted in industrial manufacturing applications. However, recent advances in 3D printable materials have shown potential for enabling numerous novel applications in the future. This special issue, consisting of 2 reviews and 10 research articles, intends to explore the possible materials that could define next-generation 3D printing.
Keywords: 3D printing, additive manufacturing, 4D printing, composite, smart materials, biomaterials, concrete, ceramic, metal
Three-dimensional (3D) printing or additive manufacturing (AM, also known as rapid prototyping) was invented three decades ago and has been evolving over the years in four fundamental respects: design, material, process, and application [1]. Among the four, material has long been a hurdle for AM to have a wider application in the manufacturing industry. Until today, only a handful of materials are well-established in 3D printing and well-accepted in industrial manufacturing applications. However, in recent years, many materials, most deemed as not printable before, have surfaced in the field as printable materials, for example, concrete [2,3], composite [4,5], shape-memory materials [6,7], and biological cells [8,9]. Though not many have reached the stage of commercialization, the endless possibilities of 3D printing have been undoubtedly manifested by these new materials. This has motivated us to think about what 3D printing materials could be tomorrow and hence we proposed a Special Issue on Next Generation Materials for 3D Printing.
This special issue covers 2 reviews and 10 research articles. First of all, Chang et al. present an overview of material strategies for developing next-generation 3D printing [10]. Yan et al. present a review on grain structure control of 3D-printed metallic materials [11]. In research articles, Bos et al. report the reinforcement effect of metal cable in 3D-printed concrete [12]. Chang et al. present the work of selective laser sintering of porous silica with a carbon additive [13]. It is found that the carbon additive improves the absorptivity of silica powder to the fiber laser. Scheithauer et al. report the successful fabrication of zirconia components with varying microstructures using thermoplastic suspensions with different contents of pore-forming agents [14]. Steyrer et al. present the influence of photoinitiator selection on the thermomechanical properties of various tough photopolymers [15]. Habib et al. show that an alginate-carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel has good printability and improved mechanical integrity [16]. Huang et al. report the effect of hydroxyapatite and β-tri-calcium phosphate in polycaprolactone-ceramic composite scaffolds [17]. Khatri et al. present the development of a new functional composite with a soft magnetic property [18]. Teoh et al. show that the design and four-dimensional (4D) printing of a cross-folded origami structure is feasible and may have the potential for developing smart paper [19]. Finally, Wang et al. present the effect of T2 heat treatment on the microstructure and properties of selective laser-melted aluminum alloy samples [20].
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore under its Medium-Sized Centre funding scheme.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Chua C.K., Leong K.F. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing: Principles and Applications. 5th ed. World Scientific Publishing Company Incorporated; Singapore: 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bos F., Wolfs R., Ahmed Z., Salet T. Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: Potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2016;11:209–225. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2016.1209867. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tay Y.W.D., Panda B., Paul S.C., Noor Mohamed N.A., Tan M.J., Leong K.F. 3D printing trends in building and construction industry: A review. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2017;12:261–276. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2017.1326724. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Francis V., Jain P.K. Experimental investigations on fused deposition modelling of polymer-layered silicate nanocomposite. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2016;11:109–121. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2016.1172431. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mohan N., Senthil P., Vinodh S., Jayanth N. A review on composite materials and process parameters optimisation for the fused deposition modelling process. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2017;12:47–59. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2016.1274490. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zarek M., Layani M., Eliazar S., Mansour N., Cooperstein I., Shukrun E., Szlar A., Cohn D., Magdassi S. 4D printing shape memory polymers for dynamic jewellery and fashionwear. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2016;11:263–270. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2016.1244085. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Teoh J.E.M., An J., Chua C.K., Lv M., Krishnasamy V., Liu Y. Hierarchically self-morphing structure through 4D printing. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2017;12:61–68. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2016.1272174. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mehrban N., Teoh G.Z., Birchall M.A. 3D bioprinting for tissue engineering: Stem cells in hydrogels. Int. J. Bioprint. 2016;2:6. doi: 10.18063/IJB.2016.01.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lee H., Koo Y., Yeo M., Kim S., Kim G.H. Recent cell printing systems for tissue engineering. Int. J. Bioprint. 2017;3:27–41. doi: 10.18063/IJB.2017.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chang J., He J., Mao M., Zhou W., Lei Q., Li X., Li D., Chua C.-K., Zhao X. Advanced material strategies for next-generation additive manufacturing. Materials. 2018;11:166. doi: 10.3390/ma11010166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yan F., Xiong W., Faierson E. Grain structure control of additively manufactured metallic materials. Materials. 2017;10:1260. doi: 10.3390/ma10111260. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bos F., Ahmed Z., Jutinov E., Salet T. Experimental exploration of metal cable as reinforcement in 3D printed concrete. Materials. 2017;10:1314. doi: 10.3390/ma10111314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nematollahi B., Vijay P., Sanjayan J., Xia M., Naidu Nerella V., Mechtcherine V. Fresh and hardened properties of extrusion-based 3D printed geopolymer for construction applications. Materials. doi: 10.3390/ma11122352. under review. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Scheithauer U., Weingarten S., Johne R., Schwarzer E., Abel J., Richter H.-J., Moritz T., Michaelis A. Ceramic-based 4D components: Additive manufacturing (AM) of ceramic-based functionally graded materials (FGM) by thermoplastic 3d printing (T3DP) Materials. 2017;10:1368. doi: 10.3390/ma10121368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Steyrer B., Neubauer P., Liska R., Stampfl J. Visible light photoinitiator for 3D-printing of tough methacrylate resins. Materials. 2017;10:1445. doi: 10.3390/ma10121445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Habib A., Sathish V., Mallik S., Khoda B. 3D printability of alginate-carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel. Materials. 2018;11:454. doi: 10.3390/ma11030454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Huang B., Caetano G., Vyas C., Blaker J., Diver C., Bártolo P. Polymer-ceramic composite scaffolds: The effect of hydroxyapatite and β-tri-calcium phosphate. Materials. 2018;11:129. doi: 10.3390/ma11010129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Khatri B., Lappe K., Noetzel D., Pursche K., Hanemann T. A 3D-printable polymer-metal soft-magnetic functional composite—Development and characterization. Materials. 2018;11:189. doi: 10.3390/ma11020189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Teoh J., An J., Feng X., Zhao Y., Chua C., Liu Y. Design and 4D printing of cross-folded origami structures: A preliminary investigation. Materials. 2018;11:376. doi: 10.3390/ma11030376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wang L., Sun J., Zhu X., Cheng L., Shi Y., Guo L., Yan B. Effects of T2 heat treatment on microstructure and properties of the selective laser melted aluminum alloy samples. Materials. 2018;11:66. doi: 10.3390/ma11010066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]