Abstract
Understanding and reshaping cellular behaviors with synthetic gene networks requires the ability to sense and respond to changes in the intracellular environment. Intracellular proteins are involved in almost all cellular processes, and thus can provide important information about changes in cellular conditions such as infections, mutations, or disease states. Here we report the design of a modular platform for intrabody-based protein sensing-actuation devices with transcriptional output triggered by detection of intracellular proteins in mammalian cells. We demonstrate reporter activation response (fluorescence, apoptotic gene) to proteins involved in hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, and Huntington’s disease, and show sensor-based interference with HIV-1 downregulation of HLA-I in infected T cells. Our method provides a means to link varying cellular conditions with robust control of cellular behavior for scientific and therapeutic applications.
Synthetic biology principles are often used to design circuits that tune gene expression in response to changes in intracellular environments. Here the authors design a modular platform for intracellular protein sensing devices with transcriptional output.
Introduction
Synthetic biology can improve our understanding of rules underlying biological pathways1,2, and offer unique approaches to tackle a number of biomedical challenges such as cancer therapy3, metabolic diseases4, and antibiotic resistance5. Genetic circuits with therapeutic capabilities require tightly controlled output activation in response to dynamic changes in the intracellular environment. Endogenous inputs such as microRNAs6,7 and proteins8–10, whose level or state often correlate with the onset and progression of a disease, have been connected to circuitry function via transcriptional or translational regulation of chosen genes in mammalian cells. However, while circuits that tune output gene expression in response to specific miRNA signatures have been demonstrated6, a customizable framework to link intracellular protein sensing to programmed cellular responses still lags behind.
To this end, we report on our development of modular sensing-actuation devices that initiate programmed transcriptional response when detecting target intracellular proteins in mammalian cells. We demonstrate the modularity of this platform by creating devices that sense four different proteins associated with diseases and respond with either fluorescent reporter activation or biological activity where applicable (cell death or receptor downregulation). We envision these devices will find use in enabling protein-responsive therapeutic gene circuits as well as in basic research.
Results
A modular platform for intracellular protein detection
Our genetically encoded framework combines sensing and actuation modules (Supplementary Fig. 1). The sensing modules are based on intracellular antibodies (intrabodies) that have recently emerged as a new tool for therapeutic and functional genomics applications due to their ability to bind a wide range of proteins in several subcellular locations11. The actuation module takes advantage of the Tango-TEV technology, previously demonstrated to efficiently convert ligand/protein-induced dimerization into transcriptional output12–14(Supplementary Note 1, Supplementary Fig. 2). Thus, by coupling this sensing module with the Tango-TEV-derived actuation module, we extend this platform to detect intracellular, medically relevant proteins.
Specifically, one intrabody is fused at the N-terminus to a membrane-tethered fluorescent tag (mKate) and at the C-terminus to a Tobacco Etch Virus (TEV) cleavage site (TCS) and to a GAL4-VP16 transcriptional activator, forming a chimeric protein sequestered in the cytosol. A second intrabody is fused to the TEV protease (TEVp) that recognizes and cleaves the TCS (Supplementary Fig. 1). The presence of the target protein and subsequent binding of the two intrabodies results in TEVp cleavage of TCS and release of GAL4-VP16, which translocates into the nucleus and converts protein detection into programmed gene expression (Fig. 1a).
In order to optimize sensing-actuation performance, we designed variants of the device by tuning several of its features. TEVp was fused to the N-terminus or C-terminus of the intrabody with a Glycine-Serine flexible linker sequence. Moreover, to obtain devices with significant ON/OFF ratio for output expression, we tested flexible linker sequences of different length to maximize the likelihood of intrabodies with protein and TEVp with TCS interactions, and tested TCS mutants-TEVp complexes with different binding constants15 (Supplementary Note 2, Supplementary Fig. 3a, Supplementary Table 2).
We first tested the membrane tethered module of the device (membrane tag-mKate-sdAb19-GAL4-VP16, Supplementary Fig. 3a). Constitutive TEVp expression induced significant activation of the reporter gene (up to 100 fold ON/OFF induction), indicating that TEV cleavage site is accessible in the design configuration, and suggesting that careful tuning of protease expression is critical to maximize signal-to-noise ratio (Supplementary Fig. 3b, c).
The selection of target proteins for testing our sensing-actuation framework was based on: (i) partial or complete cytosolic localization, and (ii) existence of intrabodies binding two different epitopes of the antigen. Following these criteria, we engineered genetic devices that recognize NS3, HTT, and Tat/Nef proteins, respectively, specific for HCV, Huntington’s disease, and HIV.
HCV sensor-actuator device
The HCV sensor-actuator device was designed to recognize NS3 serine protease16 (Fig. 1a). We engineered variants of the device architecture using single chain fragment intrabodies scFv35 and scFv162, previously reported to bind with high affinity to the N-terminus of NS317 (nNS3) and to interfere with its viral activity. We confirmed NS3-intrabody interaction by fusing a BFP tag to the N-terminus of nNS3 (BPF-nNS3) (Fig. 1b). We then co-transfected membrane tethered LD15-TCS-S/L variants of the NS3 responsive devices along with TEVp-scFv162 driven by a constitutive promoter (hEF1α) in 293FT HEK cells which revealed nNS3-independent output activation (Supplementary Fig. 4a), thus confirming that protein-dependent signal induction requires appropriately-regulated TEVp activity (Supplementary Note 2). We fine-tuned TEVp expression transcriptionally and posttranslationally using a Tetracycline/Doxycycline responsive promoter (pTET) and a degradation domain tag (DD degron) regulated by the small molecule Shield. Basal pTET expression (in the absence of Doxycycline) enabled the device to be specifically activated by endogenous nNS3 concentrations in LD15-TCS-L (Supplementary Fig. 4b), but not LD15-TCS-S variant of the device (Supplementary Fig. 4c). Of note, while the best response is in the presence of rtTA3 but absence of Doxycycline and Shield, we show that nNS3 detection works even in absence of the transcriptional activator rtTA3 (−rtTA/−Dox/+Shield) (Supplementary Fig. 4b). This is probably due to the high sensitivity to the TEVp, since either leakiness of pTET combined with increased protein stability induced by Shield, or residual activity of rtTA3 in absence of Doxycycline18,19, are sufficient to induce output activation. Our findings that low affinity TEV cleavage site (TCS-L) and low sensor concentration provide the best operating conditions (Supplementary Note 3) are in agreement with the conclusions from a computational model we implemented of the system (Supplementary Note 5, Supplementary Fig. 15–19 and Supplementary Table 3).
We then engineered further nNS3 devices where the parameters described above were tuned, including a membrane-linked variant lacking a linker domain (LD0-TCS-L), and variants of TEVp-intrabody chimeric proteins in which the protease was fused to C- or N-terminus of scFv162 with or without a linker domain. These devices exhibited up to 24 EYFP fold induction (Fig. 1c, Supplementary Fig. 4d, e). Indeed, sensitive discrimination of target proteins requires concerted regulation of TEVp activity that relies on fine transcriptional regulation and TCS affinity. Increasing Dox levels resulted in an inability to discriminate NS3 expressing cells even when TCS-L was used, whereas fusing a DD domain to TEVp did not improve sensor performance either in TCS-L or TCS-S-based devices (Supplementary Fig. 4b,c).
We showed that reporter expression is a function of nNS3-encoding plasmid concentration by co-expressing various concentrations of nNS3 or BFP-nNS3 along with the device (Fig. 1c inset, Supplementary Fig. 5a). Interestingly, we observed that very small amounts of the BFP-nNS3 encoding plasmid (3–6 ng) resulted in strong activation of EYFP (Supplementary Fig. 5a–e), at intermediate transfection marker levels (106 < mKate MEFL < 107; 60 ng of DNA), EYFP induction was significantly higher in BFP-nNS3 than nNS3 expressing cells, while at high transfection marker levels (107 < mKate MEFL < 108) EYFP levels were comparable (Supplementary Fig. 5f). This is perhaps due to a higher stability of the protein conferred by BFP. When pro-apoptotic gene hBax was incorporated as output, specific induction of apoptosis was achieved in nNS3 expressing cells, demonstrating the device’s ability to rewire cellular fate (Fig. 1d, Supplementary Fig. 6).
The key parameters of circuit design inferred from the NS3 device (i.e., fine tuning of TEVp expression and affinity to cleavage site) were consequently considered in the development of additional sensing-actuator devices. We thus generated plasmid DNA backbones enabling facile interchange of protein-specific intrabodies, which allowed us to create and test new devices on a 2-week timeline.
Huntington’s disease and HIV sensor-actuator devices
To verify that the platform can be customized to other relevant proteins, we next engineered devices for detecting Huntington’s disease and HIV infection. Huntington’s disease (HD) is a progressive, neurodegenerative disorder that results from expansion of a polyglutamine (polyQ) tract in the first exon (HDx-1) of huntingtin gene (HTT)20. We used previously developed scFvs (Happ1, VL12.3)21 and output response was either fluorescence or expression of hBax. We observed activation of fluorescence output and selective cell killing when HTT was present (Fig. 1e,f Supplementary Fig. 7a-c, Supplementary Fig. 8).
We then created devices to detect and respond to HIV infection by sensing Tat22 and Nef23 proteins. The HIV-1 transactivator protein Tat is a multifunctional protein that alters expression of host and viral genes, and plays a crucial role in HIV replication. The single chain fragments (scFv2, scFv3) used here, were previously designed to interfere with Tat activity24. The Tat-sensing devices engineered with these scFvs were able to induce reporter activation efficiently (Supplementary Fig. 9a-c). However, we did not perform a cell killing assay since Tat already exhibits mild apoptotic activity via the caspase-8 and Egr1-PTEN-FOXO3a pathways25,26.
Like Tat, Nef is an early stage gene expressed shortly after HIV infection27,28. Nef plays a prominent role in promoting viral infectivity, replication and evasion of host immune response by interfering with trafficking of several membrane receptors including CD4, CXCR4 and CCR5, as well as Human Leukocyte Antigen class I (HLA-I) molecules that present viral epitopes to CD8+ T cells27,29. Nef also facilitates infection of resting T cells and can induce a T cell activation program30,31. The Nef sensor device consists of a single domain antibody (sdAb19) that recognizes a conformational structure preserved in the core domain of the protein32 and SH3 which binds a proline-rich motif in Nef33. Both regions are conserved across different HIV strains. In contrast to our other sensors, SH3 is not an intrabody, but a domain of a p59fyn protein tyrosine kinase that is highly expressed in T lymphocytes and implicated in antigen-induced T-cell activation33. The device exhibits up to 5-fold EYFP fold induction when co-transfected along with a Nef expressing plasmid in 293FT HEK and Jurkat T cells (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Fig 10).
Nef sensor-actuator device detects several HIV strains
Next, we evaluated the ability to sense live HIV-1 infections in cells expressing the Nef-sensing device. Specifically, we performed infections with HIV X4 (NL4.3, LAI/IIIB) and R5 (JRCSF) strains that exhibit different co-receptor usage (CXCR4 or CCR5, respectively) into TZM-bl (a HeLa-based cell line). We observed EYFP expression upon HIV infection of TZM-bl cells, and also showed that when the infected cells were treated with reverse transcriptase inhibitor Efavirenz, reporter levels were near baseline (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Fig. 11). Jurkat T cells were then infected with the HIV LAI strain X4, confirming that the sensor device functions in T lymphocytes (Fig. 2c). The reduced response to HIV infection in both Jurkat and TZM-bl cells relative to plasmid expression of Nef in HEK cells may be due numerous reasons. For example, HIV-1 infected only a fraction of the cells (Supplementary Fig. 12), and in Jurkat cells the possible competition of p59fyn with heterologous SH3 for binding to Nef may hamper reporter gene activation.
We then investigated whether our device interferes with Nef-mediated down-modulation of HLA-I in Jurkat cells and observed that indeed this function of Nef is impaired when the device is expressed (Fig. 2d). Importantly, the ability to sense an early gene in HIV infection may be useful for creating a potent programmable therapeutic agent that induces a localized CD8+ CTL response (Supplementary Note 4, Supplementary Fig. 13). Toward this goal we investigated whether a rewired Nef sensing device was able to induce selective expression of XCL-1 chemokine. XCL-1 is secreted by human CD8+ T cells along with other anti-HIV chemokines, exhibits a broad spectrum of activity against several biological variants of HIV-1, and interferes with infection at early stage of viral life cycle probably via direct interaction with the virus envelope34. We performed qPCR on 293FT HEK cells expressing Nef and observed that the device triggers transcription of XCL-1 in a selective manner (Supplementary Fig. 14).
Discussion
We demonstrate a framework that uses intrabodies to connect sensing of intracellular proteins to chosen output activation. In this proof-of-concept study we tested the devices’ ability to respond to disease biomarker proteins for which intrabodies were previously developed. With technologies such as yeast and phage display libraries35,36, we can potentially obtain intrabodies against essentially any protein. Computational protein design tools such as Rosetta37 may be able to provide a large repertoire of synthetic sensing-actuator devices. Designing sensing modules toward conserved domains of the protein of interest may provide operation that is less sensitive to specific lineages and molecular evolution of the target (e.g., the Nef device operating across a broad spectrum of viral strains).
As is true for implementation of any sensor, its operation may impact the activity of the molecule that it is sensing. Therefore, an important future consideration is designing sensing modules that minimize or maximize interference with the activity of the protein of interest. To minimize interference, one may choose binding elements (e.g., intrabodies) that are less likely to obstruct the protein active site (although sequestration to the membrane could still lead to interference in some cases), or opt for intrabodies with different affinities38,39 toward the target to allow a broad dynamic range of interaction/interference. In other cases, it may be beneficial to inhibit proteins such as Nef, which induces HLA-I down modulation in T lymphocytes, and therefore one could choose binding elements (e.g., SH3) that impede binding with downstream or upstream partners. We envision that sensing HIV infected cells with a lentiviral-delivered Nef sensing-actuating genetic circuit may provide a means for studying the spatiotemporal characteristics of in vivo early viral infection. Such information could then help us design potent programmable therapeutic agents to induce a specific and localized CTL responses34 (Supplementary Note 4).
Intrabodies could also help create powerful tools to monitor diverse post-translational modifications (PTMs) in real time. PTMs not only serve as the most ubiquitous link in intracellular protein networks, but also play many other important roles, including in chromatin remodeling, transcription regulation, and cell signaling. Chirichella et al.40 have recently demonstrated newly designed intrabodies that bind acetylated proteins. By embedding this new class of intrabodies in our devices, our system can facilitate studies in a broad range of studies, e.g., ones that link PTMs to functional understanding epigenetic regulation or for spatiotemporally controlled transcriptional silencing. Our platform provides a strategy to translate aberrant protein expression, post-translational modification or viral infection into programmed transcriptional responses.
Methods
Cell culture
HEK293FT (Invitrogen) and HeLa-based TZM-bl (NIH AIDS reagent program) cells used in this study were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM, Cellgro) supplemented with 10% FBS (Atlanta BIO), 1% penicillin/streptomycin/L-Glutamine (Sigma-Aldrich) and 1% non-essential amino acids (HyClone) at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Jurkat cells (ATCC) were maintained in RPMI-1640 (ATCC) supplemented with 10% FBS (Atlanta BIO), and 1% non-essential amino acids (HyClone) at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Doxycicline and Shield (Clonetech) were diluted according to manufacturer instructions.
Transfection and fluorescence imaging
Protein sensor transfections were carried out in 24-well plate format. Transfections in HEK293FT were carried out with Attractene (Qiagen). A quantity of 300 ng of total DNA was mixed with DMEM base medium (Cellgro) without supplements to a final volume of 60 μl. A volume of 1.5 μl attractene was added to the dilutions and the samples were promptly vortexed to mix. The complexes were incubated for 20–25 min. During the incubation time, cells were harvested by trypsinization and 2 × 105 cells seeded in 500 μl of complete culture medium in 24-well plate. Transfection complexes were added dropwise to the freshly seeded cells, followed by gentle mixing. Cells were supplemented with 1 ml of fresh growth medium 24 h posttransfection and analyzed by flow cytometry after 48 h. Co-localization imaging was performed after transfecting 293FT cells in 35 mm glass bottom dishes (Fluorodish). Cells were transfected with Lipofectamine LTX following manufacturer instructions. Total of up to 400 ng DNA was mixed with Opti-MEM I reduced serum medium (Life Technologies) to a final volume of 100 μl followed by addition of 0.5 μl PLUS reagent. After 5 min, 1.5 μl Lipofectamine LTX was added, the samples were briefly vortexed and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. During the incubation time, 2 × 105 cells were harvested by trypsinization and seeded in 500 μl of complete culture medium in 24-well plate. Transfection complexes were added dropwise to the freshly seeded cells followed by gentle mixing. TZM-bl and Jurkat cells were electroporated with Neon Transfection System 10 μl Neon Tip (Life Technologies). For TZM-bl cells a total of 2 μg of DNA was prepared in a 1.5 mL tube. Meanwhile 2 × 105 cells were harvested by trypsinization, and centrifuged in PBS at 150 g for 5 min at room temperature. Cells were resuspended in resuspension buffer R and then added to the DNA tube and gently mixed. The DNA and cell mixtures were picked with the appropriate Neon Tip and transferred to the electroporator and a pulse was applied (pulse voltage 1005 v, pulse width 35 ms, pulse number 2). 3 × 105 Jurkat cells were resuspended in resuspension buffer R and electroporated with 4 μg of DNA prepared in a 1.5 ml tube as described above (pulse voltage 1325 v, pulse width 10 ms, pulse number 3). TZM-bl and Jurkat cells were infected with HIV strains around 6–12 h posttransfections, allowing for recovery after electroporation. Confocal imaging was performed with Leica TCS SP5 II microscope equipped with an incubation chamber using a ×63 objective. Other fluorescence and bright-field micrograph were acquired with Evos Cell Imaging System (Life Technology), using ×10 objective.
Flow cytometry and data analysis
Cells were analyzed with LSR Fortessa flow cytometer, equipped with 405, 488, and 561 nm lasers (BD Biosciences). We collected 30,000–100,000 events per sample and fluorescence data were acquired with the following cytometer settings: 488 nm laser and 530/30 nm bandpass filter for EYFP/EGFP, 561 nm laser and 610/20 nm filter for mKate, and 405 nm laser, 450/50 filter for EBFP. Population of live cells was selected according to FCS/SSC parameters (Supplementary Fig. 20).
Flow cytometry data was converted from arbitrary units to compensated Molecules of Equivalent Fluorescein (MEFL) using the TASBE characterization method41,42. The TASBE method uses a strong constitutively expressed fluorophore, which serves as both a transfection marker and an indicator of relative circuit copy count. An affine compensation matrix is computed from single positive and blank controls. FITC measurements are calibrated to MEFL using SpheroTech RCP-30-5-A beads41,43 and mappings from other channels to equivalent FITC are computed from co-transfection of constitutively expressed EBFP, EYFP, and mKate, each controlled by the hEF1a promoter on its own otherwise identical plasmid. MEFL data are segmented by constitutive fluorescent protein expression into logarithmic bins at 10 bins/decade, and because the data are log-normally distributed, geometric mean, and variance computed for those data points in each bin. Based on the observed constitutive fluorescence distributions, a threshold was selected for each data set, below which data were excluded as being too close to the non-transfected population: 1 × 107 MEFL for NS3 and NEF HEK, 3 × 107 MEFL for HTT and TAT, 2 × 105 MEFL for TZM-bl and 105 for Jurkat data sets. High outliers are removed by excluding all bins without at least 100 data points. Both population and per-bin geometric statistics are computed over this filtered set of data. All experiments included at least three biological replicates and error bars indicate standard deviation. Variance for all groups is generally similar: any differences are reflected in the displayed standard deviation.
HIV production and infection
HIV-1 strains were produced by transfection of HEK-293T cells with the corresponding infectious molecular clones (NIH AIDS reagents program) and JetPRIME® reagent (Polyplus transfection #114-07). After 40 h, virus preparations were concentrated by ultracentrifugation for 1 h, 64074 g, 4 °C on 20% sucrose to avoid viral particle-free proteins. Viral stocks were titered by HIV-1 p24 ELISA (PerkinElmer NEK050B001KT). For infection of TZM-bl cells, a viral inoculum of 500 ng of p24 was used for each strain. Fourty hours after infection, the cells were harvested, fixed, and permeabilized with cytofix/cytoperm solution (BD Biosciences #554722) for 15 min. The percentage of infected cells was then determined by intracellular staining of viral protein p24 with a conjugated antibody (KC57-FITC from Beckman Coulter #CO6604665, dilution 1:50) and flow-cytometry.
HLA-I surface expression
Surface expression of HLA-I molecules was determined by staining before fixation with AlexaFluor® 647 mouse anti-human HLA-A, B, C antibody clone W6/32 (Biolegend® #311414, dilution 1:20). Fluorescence signals were then quantified with a flow-cytometer BD LSR-II system (Becton Dickinson) and FACSDiva8 software with the following settings: 640 nm laser and 670/14 nm filter. Flow cytometry data were converted from arbitrary units to compensated molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome (MESF) using Spherotech #RCP-30- 5A-2. Data were analyzed with FlowJo software. The mean of fluorescence (MFI) was determined and plotted for each condition. Results are from three independent experiments and error bars represent standard deviations.
Apoptosis assays
Sensing-actuation devices transfections were performed along with pCMV-EGFP transfection marker. Sample cells including those in supernatant were collected 48 h posttransfection, washed with PBS, and stained with Pacific Blue conjugated 2.5 μL of Annexin V (LifeTechnologies) in 50 μL of binding buffer for 10 min at room temperature. Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Positive transfection cells (EGFP+) were gated and within this population we calculated apoptosis (cell death) induction, defined as the percentage of Pacific-Blue conjugated AnnexinV positive cells. All experiments included at least three biological replicates and error bars indicate standard error. Data analysis for the apoptotic assays was performed with FlowJo software.
DNA cloning and plasmid construction
Plasmid vectors carrying gene cassettes were created using with Gateway system (Life technology), Infusion cloning system (Clonetech), or Golden Gate system (developed in-house). The list of all plasmids used in this study is shown in Supplementary Table 1.
RNA extraction and RealTime PCR
RNA extraction was performed with RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). Cells were washed in PBS and buffer RTL was added directly into the wells. Cells were then left there for 2 min, collected with a sterile scraper, and RNA was extracted according to manufacturer instructions. RNA was eluted in 30 μL of RNAse free water to maximize the yield. RNA samples were conserved at −80 °C. cDNA was obtained by using QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The protocol was performed on ice in RNAse free environment to avoid RNA degradation. A negative control without Quantiscript Reverse Transcriptase was always prepared to assess contamination of genomic DNA of the RNA preparation. cDNA were diluted 1:10 and Fast SYBR Green Master Mix (ThermoFisher Scientific) was used to perform qPCR. Samples were loaded in MicroAmp™ Fast Optical 96-Well Reaction Plate (0.1 mL) and the experiment was carried out with a StepOnePlus™ 7500 Fast machine. Each well contained 20 μL of final volume (10 μL SYBR Green Master Mix, 7 μL ddHO, 1 μL of each primer, and 1 μL of template). Also, a control without template (blank) was set. 2−ddCt was calculated to measure the fold change of output expression (XCL-1) in presence or absence of the target protein (Nef), after normalization of Ct values to endogenous housekeeping gene expression (GAPDH). Primers: GAPDH Forward GAAGATGGTGATGGGATTTC; GAPDH Reverse GAAGTTGAAGGTCGGAGT; XCL-1 Forward CTTGGCATCTGCTCTCTCACT; XCL-1 Reverse AGGCTCACACAGGTCCTCTTA.
Data availability
The source data for all figures of this study as well as custom simulation code are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Plasmid sequences have been deposited at GenBank under the accession codes found in Supplementary Table 1.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We thank Mafalda Graziano for helping with DNA cloning and preparation. We thank Joy Richmala for helping with confocal imaging. We thank Stefano Santaguida for helping with sensor-actuator diagram design. This work was supported by the DARPA W911NF-11-2-0054 and NIH P50 GM098792.
Author contributions
V.S. and R.W. conceived the idea, V.S. designed and performed experiments, V.S., B.D., K.L.C., and B.M. performed experiments on HIV infection, J.B. and B.D. performed statistical analysis. V.S., B.D., and J.H. designed and built NEF devices. B.D. developed the mathematical model and performed simulations. L.W. provided scientific input on chimeric protein design. B.D.W. provided input on HIV experiments and applications in the HIV field. A.M.K. provided technical support for the HIV experiment with HIV LAI strain. V.S. wrote the manuscript. R.W., J.B., B.D., B.M., and B.D.W. edited the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
These authors contributed equally: Breanna DiAndreth, Blandine Monel, Jacob Beal.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-018-03984-5.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Velia Siciliano, Email: velia.siciliano@iit.it.
Ron Weiss, Email: rweiss@mit.edu.
References
- 1.Tigges M, Marquez-Lago TT, Stelling J, Fussenegger M. A tunable synthetic mammalian oscillator. Nature. 2009;457:309–312. doi: 10.1038/nature07616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Siciliano V, et al. MiRNAs confer phenotypic robustness to gene networks by suppressing biological noise. Nat. Commun. 2013;4:2364. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zah E, Lin MY, Silva-Benedict A, Jensen MC, Chen YY. T cells expressing CD19/CD20 bi-specific chimeric antigen receptors prevent antigen escape by malignant B cells. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2016;4:498–508. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ye H, et al. Pharmaceutically controlled designer circuit for the treatment of the metabolic syndrome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:141–146. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216801110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Thaker MN, Wright GD. Opportunities for synthetic biology in antibiotics: expanding glycopeptide chemical diversity. ACS Synth. Biol. 2015;4:195–206. doi: 10.1021/sb300092n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Xie Z, Wroblewska L, Prochazka L, Weiss R, Benenson Y. Multi-input RNAi-based logic circuit for identification of specific cancer cells. Science. 2011;333:1307–1311. doi: 10.1126/science.1205527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Miki K, et al. Efficient detection and purification of cell populations using synthetic microRNA switches. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;16:699–711. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Weber W, Bacchus W, Daoud-El Baba M, Fussenegger M. Vitamin H-regulated transgene expression in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:e116. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Culler SJ, Hoff KG, Smolke CD. Reprogramming cellular behavior with RNA controllers responsive to endogenous proteins. Science. 2010;330:1251–1255. doi: 10.1126/science.1192128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ausländer S, et al. A general design strategy for protein-responsive riboswitches in mammalian cells. Nat. Methods. 2014;11:1154–1160. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lo ASY, Zhu Q, Marasco WA. Intracellular antibodies (intrabodies) and their therapeutic potential. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2008;181:343–373. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-73259-4_15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Barnea G, et al. The genetic design of signaling cascades to record receptor activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008;105:64–69. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710487105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schwarz KA, Daringer NM, Dolberg TB, Leonard JN. Rewiring human cellular input–output using modular extracellular sensors. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2016;13:202–209. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wieland M, et al. Engineered UV-A light-responsive gene expression system for measuring sun cream efficacy in mammalian cell culture. J. Biotechnol. 2014;189:150–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kapust RB, Tözsér J, Copeland TD, Waugh DS. The P1’ specificity of tobacco etch virus protease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002;294:949–955. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)00574-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ross CA, Tabrizi SJ. Huntington’s disease: from molecular pathogenesis to clinical treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:83–98. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70245-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gal-Tanamy M, et al. HCV NS3 serine protease-neutralizing single-chain antibodies isolated by a novel genetic screen. J. Mol. Biol. 2005;347:991–1003. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Urlinger S, et al. Exploring the sequence space for tetracycline-dependent transcriptional activators: Novel mutations yield expanded range and sensitivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000;97:7963–7968. doi: 10.1073/pnas.130192197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Forster K, et al. Tetracycline-inducible expression systems with reduced basal activity in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:708–710. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.2.708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ross CA, Tabrizi SJ. Huntington’s disease: from molecular pathogenesis to clinical treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:83–98. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70245-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Southwell AL, et al. Intrabodies binding the proline-rich domains of mutant huntingtin increase its turnover and reduce neurotoxicity. J. Neurosci. 2008;28:9013–9020. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2747-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Romani B, Engelbrecht S, Glashoff RH. Functions of Tat: the versatile protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Gen. Virol. 2010;91:1–12. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.016303-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Basmaciogullari, S., Pizzato, M., Rowland-Jones, S. & Schindler, M. The activity of Nef on HIV-1 infectivity 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00232 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 24.Marasco Wa, LaVecchio J, Winkler A. Human anti-HIV-1 tat sFv intrabodies for gene therapy of advanced HIV-1-infection and AIDS. Science. 1999;293:1503–1506. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1759(99)00159-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bartz SR, Emerman M. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 TAT induces apoptosis and increases sensitivity to apoptotic signals by up-regulating FLICE/caspase-8. J. Virol. 2013;73:1956–1963. doi: 10.1128/jvi.73.3.1956-1963.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dabrowska, A., Kim, N. Springer & Aldovini, A. Tat-Induced FOXO3a is a key mediator of apoptosis in HIV-1-infected human CD4. J. Immunol. 181, 8460–8477 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 27.Piguet V, Trono D. The Nef protein of primate lentiviruses. Rev. Med. Virol. 1999;14:763–777. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1654(199904/06)9:2<111::aid-rmv245>3.0.co;2-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wu Y, Marsh JW. Selective transcription and modulation of resting T cell activity by preintegrated HIV DNA. Science. 2001;293:1503–1506. doi: 10.1126/science.1061548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mann J, et al. Ability of HIV-1 Nef to downregulate CD4 and HLA class I differs among viral subtypes. Retrovirology. 2013;10:100. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-10-100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Stevenson M, et al. HIV-1 Nef mediates lymphocyte chemotaxis and activation by infectedmacrophages. Nat. Med. 1999;5:997–103. doi: 10.1038/12433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Simmons A, Aluvihare V, Mcmichael A. Nef triggers a transcriptional program in T cells imitating single-signal T cell activation and inducing HIV virulence mediators. Immunity. 2001;14:763–777. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(01)00158-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bouchet J, et al. Inhibition of the Nef regulatory protein of HIV-1 by a single-domain antibody. Blood. 2011;117:3559–3568. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-07-296749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Arold S, et al. The crystal structure of HIV-1 Nef protein bound to the Fyn kinase SH3 domain suggests a role for this complex in altered T cell receptor signaling. Structure. 1997;5:1361–1372. doi: 10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00286-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Guzzo C, et al. The CD8-derived chemokine XCL1/lymphotactin is a conformation-dependent, broad-spectrum inhibitor of HIV-1. PLoS. Pathog. 2013;9:e1003852. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hammers CM, Stanley JR. Antibody phage display: technique and applications. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2014;134:e17. doi: 10.1038/jid.2013.521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Boder ET, Wittrup KD. Yeast surface display for screening combinatorial polypeptide libraries. Nat. Biotechnol. 1997;15:553–557. doi: 10.1038/nbt0697-553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Thyme S, Baker D. Redesigning the specificity of protein-DNA interactions with Rosetta. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014;1123:265–282. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-968-0_17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Dmitriev OY, Lutsenko S, Muyldermans S. Nanobodies as probes for protein dynamics in vitro and in cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:3767–3775. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R115.679811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ahmad ZA, et al. ScFv antibody: principles and clinical application. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2012;2012:980250. doi: 10.1155/2012/980250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chirichella M, et al. Post-translational selective intracellular silencing of acetylated proteins with de novo selected intrabodies. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:279–282. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Beal, J., Weiss, R., Yaman, F., Davidsohn, N. & Adler, A. A Method for fast, high-precision characterization of synthetic biology devices (2012).
- 42.Beal J, et al. Model-driven engineering of gene expression from RNA replicons. ACS Synth. Biol. 2014;4:48–56. doi: 10.1021/sb500173f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kiani S, et al. CRISPR transcriptional repression devices and layered circuits in mammalian cells. Nat. Methods. 2014;11:723–726. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The source data for all figures of this study as well as custom simulation code are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Plasmid sequences have been deposited at GenBank under the accession codes found in Supplementary Table 1.