Skip to main content
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene logoLink to The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
. 2018 Mar 12;98(5):1339–1342. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0814

Natural Infection of Phlebotomus sergenti by Leishmania tropica in Libya

Mostafa Ramadhan Dokhan 1,2,, Kaouther Jaouadi 3,4,*,, Sadok Salem 3,4, Osama Zenbil 1, Jean Paul Gonzalez 5, Afif Ben Salah 3,4,6,7, Badreddin Bashir Annajar 1,8
PMCID: PMC5953382  PMID: 29532769

Abstract.

Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL) is a public health concern caused by Leishmania (L.) major and L. tropica in Libya. Information on sandfly vectors, as well as their associated Leishmania species, is of paramount importance because vector dispersion is one of the major factors responsible for pathogen dissemination. A number of 515 sandflies (275 males and 240 females) were collected during June–November 2012 using the Centers for Disease Control miniature light traps from Al Rabta, northwest of Libya. Two hundred and forty unfed females were identified; Phlebotomus (Ph.) papatasi (N = 97), Ph. sergenti (N = 27), Ph. longicuspis (N = 32), Sergentomyia (Se.) minuta (N = 38), and Se. fallax (N = 46). These flies were screened for Leishmania DNA using the polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the internal transcribed spacer 1 and sequencing. Two Ph. sergenti were found positive to L. tropica DNA. This finding should be considered for any further vector surveillance and epidemiological studies of CL in endemic areas across Libya.

INTRODUCTION

Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL) is one of the world’s most neglected diseases generally affecting developing countries. In North Africa, CL incidence has been increasing since 1980s with an expansion in its geographical distribution.1

In Libya, the estimated total number of cases between 1971 and 2013 was more than 60,000 with an estimated 20,000 cases that occurred from 2004 to 2009 only.2 In Libya, both types of Leishmaniasis are known to affect humans: zoonotic CL due to Leishmania (L.) major3 and anthroponotic CL caused by L. tropica.4 Among the two clinical CL forms, infection by L. tropica is a serious health problem because the treatment is difficult, and parasite persistence for up to a year, and finally, the possible risk of leishmaniasis recidivans.5,6 Cutaneous leishmaniasis ulcers occur in several regions of the body; however, it is more common in the face which is in exposure to the sandfly bites. In Libya, L. tropica was described for the first time in the district of Misrata (northeast of Libya) in 2006.4 In 2012, Amro et al.7 reported the first molecular typing of the L. tropica identified from Murqub, Al Jabal Al Gharbi, and in addition in Nalut districts.8 To date, it is believed that Phlebotomus (Ph.) sergenti is the vector of L. tropica in Tunisia,9 Algeria,10 Morocco,11 and Egypt.12 However, no studies have been carried out to demonstrate the natural infection of sandflies with L. tropica in Libya. The objective of the study includes sandfly vector surveillance and identifying the natural infections of Leishmania parasites in these flies for vector incrimination in Al Rabta district.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was carried out in two villages in Al Rabta area: Al Rabta East (RE) and Al Rabta West (RW) (Figure 1). Al Rabta (32°9′46.59″ N, 12°50′50.65″ E) is a rural area in the foothills of the Nafusa Mountains. It has an altitude of about 300 m above the sea level. The area is characterized by a warm and dry climate with an average annual rainfall of 16 mm. The mean annual temperature of the area is 21°C. The main components of local economy of the study area are agriculture and pastoralism.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Satellite maps showing the sandfly sampling sites in Al Rabta East (RW) and Al Rabta West (RE) villages in the northwestern region of Libya. This figure appears in color at www.ajtmh.org.

Sampling of sandflies was carried out in four outdoor resting sites (T1 and T2 in RW and T3 and T4 in RE). Specimens were collected from outside of caves and abandoned old settlements during June–November, 2012, using the CDC miniature light traps (Model 512; John W. Hock Co., Gainesville, FL). The traps were set before sunset and collected after sunrise next morning. The collected sandflies were then placed in 1.5-mL Eppendorf tubes with 70% ethanol. All the sandflies were washed and subdivided into males and unfed females. The head and the posterior part of the abdomen of a single sandfly are cut off with single-use sterile equipment in a drop of ethanol and then cleared in boiling Marc-André solution. All flies were mounted for species identification via local morphological keys.13 These keys examined the morphological characters of head and spermathecae in females or head and genitalia in males. The remaining parts of the female body were stored in 1.5-mL sterile microtubes at −20°C until genomic DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

The internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) region was amplified in positive flies using the primers LITSR (5′-CTGGATCATTTTCCGATG-3′) and L5.8S (5′-TGATACCACTTATCGCACTT-3′), following the protocol described by Schönian et al.14 This polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to amplify a 300–350-base pair (bp) fragment of the gene along with a 100-bp DNA size marker. The MHOM/TN/80/IPT1 Leishmania reference strain was used as positive control. Negative control (i.e., PCR mix without DNA) was added to each PCR run.

Then, the ITS1-PCR products were digested with restriction endonuclease HaeIII enzyme for Leishmania species identification.14 The restriction profiles were analyzed by electrophoresis on 3% agarose gels stained with 10% GelRed (Biotium, Fremont, CA) and compared with Leishmania reference strains used as positives controls: L. major MON-25 MHOM/TN2009/S600, L. tropica MON-8 MHOM/TN/2011/MX, and L. infantum MHOM/TN/80/IPT1. A 100-bp DNA size marker was used.

Before sequencing, the amplicon products were purified using exonuclease I/shrimp alkaline phosphatase. Sequencing was conducted using the BigDye Terminator version 3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and an ABI PRISM 3500 DNA-automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Basic Local Alignment Tool analysis of GenBank was used to assess the level of similarity with previously reported sequences (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/).15 A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining algorithm available via the MEGA software (v. 6.0).16

RESULTS

A total of 515 sandflies were captured in this study (275 males and 240 females). Three species belonging to the genus Phlebotomus and two species belonging to the genus Sergentomyia (Se.) were identified: 97 Ph. papatasi (Scopoli, 1786), 27 Ph. (Paraphlebotomus) sergenti (Parrot, 1917), 32 Ph. (Larroussius) longicuspis (Nitzulescu, 1930), 38 Se. minuta (Rondani, 1843), and 46 Se. fallax (Parrot, 1921) (Table 1). Males were not considered regarding that only females were hematophagous.

Table 1.

Number of M and F sandflies collected in RE and RW villages in the northwest of Libya

Ph. papatasi Ph. sergenti Ph. longicuspis Se. minuta Se. fallax
M F M F M F M F M F
RW T1 34 27 17 08 04 08 14 10 14 21
T2 31 29 13 07 07 10 15 11 05 03
RE T3 29 22 12 06 04 09 16 13 10 18
T4 24 19 07 06 05 05 08 04 06 04
Total 118 97 49 27 20 32 53 38 35 46

F = females; M = males; Ph. = Phlebotomus; RE = Al Rabta East; RW = Al Rabta West; and Se. = Sergentomyia.

All of the 240 females were tested for the presence of Leishmania parasite DNA.

The ITS1-PCR showed two positive specimens with a unique band (Figure 2A). The two positive samples were subjected to restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis for species identification and were found positive to L. tropica (Figure 2B). To confirm results, ITS1-PCR products obtained in the sandfly-positive samples were subjected to sequencing analysis.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(A) Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of Leishmania (L.) DNA using internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) from sandfly females. MW =: Molecular Weight marker 100-bp (Invitrogen®, Carlsbad, CA), Lane 1 = negative control (PCR mix without DNA), Lane 2 = L. major MHOM/TN2009/S600, Lane 3 = L. tropica MON-8 /MHOM/TN/2011/MX, Lane 4 = L. infantum MHOM/TN/80/IPT1, Lane 5-6 = Leishmania ITS1 sequence amplified from Ph. sergenti. (B) Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism products of the amplified ITS 1 fragment using HaeIII enzyme. MW = 100-bp size marker (Invitrogen®, Carlsbad, CA), Lane 1 = L. major MHOM/TN2009/S600 (two fragments of 132 and 206 bp), Lane 2 = L. tropica MON-8/MHOM/TN/2011/MX (three fragments of 188, 57, and 26 bp), Lane 3 = L. infantum MHOM/TN/80/IPT1 (three fragments of 187, 72, and 55 bp). Lanes 4-5 = Positive samples: L. tropica 1*, L. tropica 2*. This figure appears in color at www.ajtmh.org.

Regarding the ITS1 gene, an amplicon product sequence of 250 bp was used for phylogenetic analysis. All sequenced ITS1 gene amplicons, including the Libyan strain of L. tropica (accession KP691595) and the Tunisian strain of L. tropica isolated from Ph. sergenti (GenBank accession JN104588), were grouped into a unique clade of L. tropica haplotype (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Phylogenic analysis of internal transcribed spacer 1 sequences from sandflies (tree obtained by the neighbor-joining method, Leishmania (L.) braziliensis chosen as an out-group); L. tropica 1* and L. tropica 2* were isolated from Phlebotomus (Ph.) sergenti sampled in this study; and **: nucleotide sequences from GenBank.

DISCUSSION

Al Rabta is identified as an endemic foci where CL is clinically documented from 1977 to 1980 and from 2004 to 2012.2 In spite of this situation, the area was surveyed for sandflies only by Annajar17 and Dokhan et al.2

Five sandfly species (three Phlebotomus and two Sergentomyia) were identified in the present study. This presents a species diversity lower than that described by Dokhan et al.,2 in the same foci where nine species were reported. The most likely factor that may explain this discrepancy is the sample size because these authors have identified 5,605 specimens.

In Libya, L. major infecting Ph. papatasi, is in agreement with the epidemiology of the disease. To our knowledge, this is the first evidence of potential risk of infection by Ph. sergenti in Libya.18 Indeed, from the literature, only Ph. papatasi was identified as a potential vector of Leishmania in Libya.17,19

Also, the ITS1-PCR showed that the two positive Ph. sergenti of our study presented a unique characteristic banding pattern of the genus Leishmania. In the present study, Ph. sergenti specimens harboring L. tropica DNA have been caught in natural biotopes of Al Rabta and confirmed by ITS1-PCR amplicon sequencing analysis. Jaouadi et al.9 identified Ph. sergenti infected by L. tropica in the same mountain biotope of Metlaoui (southwestern Tunisia).9 More recently, the same result has been reported in Sidi Bouzid, a classical focus of L. major in central Tunisia.20 The high infection rate among sandflies (2/27) may come from the higher infection rates among human cases. Similar findings of sandfly infections were reported in previous regional studies in Tunisia9,20 and Algeria.10

The identification of the natural hosts of Leishmania species is essential to understand the epidemiology of the disease. In North Africa, several rodent species have been implicated in the transmission of L. tropica.21,22 Ctenodactylus gundi has been proposed as a reservoir host in Tunisia,23 whereas in Algeria, L. tropica is considered a zoonotic form with Massoutiera mzabi as a reservoir.10 In Egypt, Gerbillus pyramidum floweri has been infected with L. tropica.12 In Libya, parasite isolation has been reported, yet it needs to be documented for a better understanding of the epidemiology of CL in Libya.

Since February 2011, the ongoing armed conflict in Libya has largely impacted the health-care system and disrupted the national and international control programs of CL. In addition, climate change scenarios could eventually affect sandfly vectors distribution and CL dispersion in Libya.18 Herein, the first natural infection of Ph. sergenti by L. tropica is reported. This novel finding enhances the understanding of the L. tropica transmission cycle in Libya. Altogether and without further study, it is not clear whether the parasite will spread to other surrounding areas and what barriers exist to prevent L. tropica from further expansion from Al Rabta districts to other new foci across the country.

Acknowledgments:

We are grateful to all members of the Libyan teamwork who contributed to the field work and sandfly collection of the study. We thank Tahar Ahmad Achaibi, Mohamed Salah Chebli, Ahmad Ali Al Rifaai, Anouar Almontassar, Othman Marsouka, Mohamed Youssef Chaabane, Walid Assaadaoui, and Nourredine Rachid. The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (ASTMH) assisted with publication expenses.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Aoun K, Bouratbine A, 2014. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in North Africa: a review. Parasite 21: 14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dokhan MR, Kenawy MA, Doha SA, El-Hosary SS, Shaibi T, Annajar BB, 2016. Entomological studies of phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in relation to cutaneous leishmaniasis transmission in Al Rabta, north west of Libya. Acta Trop 154: 95–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ashford R, Chance M, Ebert F, Schnur L, Bushwereb A, Drebi S, 1976. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in the Libyan Arab Republic: distribution of the disease and identity of the parasite. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 70: 401–409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Aoun K, Bousslimi N, Haouas N, Babba H, El-Buni A, Bouratbine A, 2006. First report of Leishmania (L.) killicki Rioux, Lanotte & Pratlong, 1986 in Libya. Parasite 13: 87–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Magill AJ, Grogl M, Gasser RA, Jr., Sun W, Oster CN, 1993. Visceral infection caused by Leishmania tropica in veterans of Operation Desert Storm. N Engl J Med 328: 1383–1387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shehata MG, Samy AM, Doha SA, Fahmy AR, 2014. Natural and experimental evidence of viscerotropic infection caused by Leishmania tropica from North Sinai, Egypt. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 44: 425–434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Amro A, Gashout A, Al-Dwibe H, Alam MZ, Annajar B, Hamarsheh O, Shubar H, Schönian G, 2012. First molecular epidemiological study of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Libya. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6: e1700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Belal US, Abdel-Hafeez EH, Naoi K, Norose K, 2012. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in the Nalut district, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya: a clinico-epidemiologic study and Leishmania species identification. J Parasitol 98: 1251–1256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jaouadi K, Depaquit J, Haouas N, Chaara D, Gorcii M, Chargui N, Dedet J-P, Pratlong F, Boubabous R, Babba H, 2012. Twenty-four new human cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis due to Leishmania killicki in Metlaoui, southwestern Tunisia: probable role of Phlebotomus sergenti in the transmission. Acta Trop 122: 276–283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Boubidi S, Benallal K, Boudrissa A, Bouiba L, Bouchareb B, Garni R, Bouratbine A, Ravel C, Dvorak V, Votypka J, 2011. Phlebotomus sergenti (Parrot, 1917) identified as Leishmania killicki host in Ghardaia, south Algeria. Microbes Infect 13: 691–696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Guilvard E, Rioux J-A, Gallego M, Pratlong F, Mahjour J, Martinez-Ortega E, Dereure J, Saddiki A, Martini A, 1991. Leishmania tropica au Maroc. III—rôle vecteur de Phlebotomus sergenti: a propos de 89 isolats. Ann Parasitol Hum Comp 66: 96–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shehata MG, Samy AM, Doha SA, Fahmy AR, Kaldas RM, Furman BD, Villinski JT, 2009. First report of Leishmania tropica from a classical focus of L. major in North-Sinai, Egypt. Am J Trop Med Hyg 81: 213–218. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Croset H, Rioux J, Maistre M, Bayar N, 1978. The phlebotomines of Tunisia (Diptera-Phlebotominae). A revision of the systematics, distribution and behaviour (author’s transl). Ann Parasitol Hum Comp 53: 711–749. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schönian G, Nasereddin A, Dinse N, Schweynoch C, Schallig HD, Presber W, Jaffe CL, 2003. PCR diagnosis and characterization of Leishmania in local and imported clinical samples. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 47: 349–358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ, 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215: 403–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S, 2013. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30: 2725–2729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Annajar BB, 1999. Epidemiology of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Libya. PhD Thesis, Keele University, Newcastle, United Kingdom, 189.
  • 18.Samy AM, Annajar BB, Dokhan MR, Boussaa S, Peterson AT, 2016. Coarse-resolution ecology of etiological agent, vector, and reservoirs of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in Libya. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 10: e0004381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ashford R, Schnur L, Chance M, Samaan S, Ahmed H, 1977. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in the Libyan Arab Republic: preliminary ecological findings. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 71: 265–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jaouadi K, Bettaieb J, Bennour A, Salem S, Rjeibi MR, Chaabane S, Yazidi R, Khabouchi N, Gharbi A, Salah AB, 2017. First report on natural infection of Phlebotomus sergenti with Leishmania tropica in a classical focus of Leishmania major in Tunisia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 97: 291–294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jacobson RL, 2003. Leishmania tropica (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae)—a perplexing parasite. Folia Parasitol (Praha) 50: 241–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Echchakery M, Chicharro C, Boussaa S, Nieto J, Carrillo E, Sheila O, Moreno J, Boumezzough A, 2017. Molecular detection of Leishmania infantum and Leishmania tropica in rodent species from endemic cutaneous leishmaniasis areas in Morocco. Parasit Vectors 10: 454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jaouadi K, Haouas N, Chaara D, Gorcii M, Chargui N, Augot D, Pratlong F, Dedet J-P, Ettlijani S, Mezhoud H, 2011. First detection of Leishmania killicki (Kinetoplastida, Trypanosomatidae) in Ctenodactylus gundi (Rodentia, Ctenodactylidae), a possible reservoir of human cutaneous leishmaniasis in Tunisia. Parasit Vectors 4: 159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene are provided here courtesy of The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

RESOURCES