Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2018 May 16;8:7646. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25975-8

Cu/Cu2O nanocomposite films as a p-type modified layer for efficient perovskite solar cells

You-Jyun Chen 1, Ming-Hsien Li 1, Jung-Chun-Andrew Huang 2,4,1,, Peter Chen 1,3,5,
PMCID: PMC5955939  PMID: 29769568

Abstract

Cu/Cu2O films grown by ion beam sputtering were used as p-type modified layers to improve the efficiency and stability of perovskite solar cells (PSCs) with an n-i-p heterojunction structure. The ratio of Cu to Cu2O in the films can be tuned by the oxygen flow ratio (O2/(O2 + Ar)) during the sputtering of copper. Auger electron spectroscopy was performed to determine the elemental composition and chemical state of Cu in the films. Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy and photoluminescence spectroscopy revealed that the valence band maximum of the p-type Cu/Cu2O matches well with the perovskite. The Cu/Cu2O film not only acts as a p-type modified layer but also plays the role of an electron blocking buffer layer. By introducing the p-type Cu/Cu2O films between the low-mobility hole transport material, spiro-OMeTAD, and the Ag electrode in the PSCs, the device durability and power conversion efficiency (PCE) were effectively improved as compared to the reference devices without the Cu/Cu2O interlayer. The enhanced PCE is mainly attributed to the high hole mobility of the p-type Cu/Cu2O film. Additionally, the Cu/Cu2O film serves as a protective layer against the penetration of humidity and Ag into the perovskite active layer.

Introduction

Since the pioneering work of Prof. Miyasaka1, hybrid organic-inorganic halide perovskite materials have attracted tremendous research interest owing to their inherent photo-electrical properties, making them suitable light absorbers for photovoltaic devices. To date, the highest power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 22.7% has been demonstrated for perovskite solar cells (PSCs)2. The selection of hole transport materials (HTMs) is crucial for effective hole transport from the perovskite structure and the resultant photovoltaic performance38. High efficiency PSCs usually use organic HTMs such as 2,2′,7,7′-tetrakis-(N,N-di-p-methoxyphenylamine)-9,9′-bifluorene (spiro-OMeTAD), Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS), Poly(triarylamine) (PTAA), and Poly(3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl) (P3HT). However, their low environmental stability hampers the application of such PSCs. In contrast with organic HTMs, inorganic HTMs are of considerable interest for application in PSCs owing to their long-term stability and high mobility6,7. The use of inorganic HTMs on perovskites can also reduce or even prevent oxygen and water penetration, reducing the degradation rate of the as-formed perovskite911. However, the deposition of inorganic HTMs on perovskite must be performed below 100 °C, as perovskite is unstable at high temperatures1218. Therefore, the appropriate preparation of HTMs is a key issue in the further development of perovskite solar cells.

Over the past few decades, the electrical, optical, and magnetic properties of cuprous oxide (Cu2O) have been studied extensively1925. CuOx has been demonstrated as an efficient p-contact for PSCs owing to the good match between its valence bands and perovskite and its promising hole mobility2630. The efficiency was recently improved to 19% in a p-i-n inverted structure using a Cl-doped CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite31. However, the CuOx-coated substrate generally suffers a low transmittance in the visible light range below 550 nm and ultrathin CuOx films are necessary to minimize the optical loss in the inverted structure. It should be noted that much less work has been implemented on inorganic HTMs for use in PSCs with n-i-p structure10,13,32. The deposition of HTMs on perovskite is limited because perovskite is vulnerable to high temperatures and polar solvents. In 2016, Nejand et al. demonstrated the production of a uniform, dense, and pinhole-free Cu2O-covered perovskite by controlling the tilting angle of the substrate and the deposition power and period via angular rotation of the substrate during the reactive magnetron sputtering process. This angular rotation prevents bombardment damage on the perovskite, but the efficiency of the solar cell only reached 8.93%10.

In this work, we report, for the first time, a p-type Cu/Cu2O and a spiro-OMeTAD layer as combinatorial HTMs in n-i-p heterojunction PSCs to improve the hole extraction capability, device performance, and device stability. For a 20-nm-thick Cu/Cu2O film with an oxygen flow ratio (OFR) of 60%, a high mobility of 60.5 cm2/V-s was obtained, which results in a superior PCE of 17.11% for the PSC, as compared to the standard device with only spiro-OMeTAD as the HTM (PCE of 13.97%). The stability test shows that the Cu/Cu2O layer provides enhanced durability under ambient conditions. Hence, the p-type Cu/Cu2O composite film is a promising HTM modified layer for highly efficient PSCs and a good protection layer for the perovskite active layer. In addition, to meet the demand for energy level alignments in our devices, insertion of the spiro-OMeTAD layer is necessary to prevent damage of the perovskite during the high energy sputtering of the Cu/Cu2O composite layer.

Results

Characterizations of the Cu/Cu2O composite films

Figure 1 shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the ion-beam sputtered Cu/Cu2O composite films deposited on glass over a 5-min period (approximately 20-nm thick) with the OFR ranging from 0 to 60%. The diffraction from pure Cu in the absence of oxygen is shown at the bottom of Fig. 1(a). The characteristic peaks at 43.4°, 50.45°, and 74.05° can be assigned to the Cu (111), (200), and (220) planes, respectively. For the OFR increasing from 10% to 50%, the intensities of the Cu phases are weaken while the Cu2O phase are intensified, suggesting the increasing volume ratio of Cu2O in the nanocomposite films. With further increasing OFR to 60%, there is no visible Cu diffraction and the Cu2O (220) phase dominates. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the corresponding Cu/Cu2O composite films are provided in the Supporting Information Fig. S1. Owing to the difference in the contrast between Cu and Cu2O, a small number of bright spots were observed for the OFR ranging from 30% to 50%, which are likely associated with the existence of Cu (Supporting Information Fig. S1(c–e)). Smooth morphology with a negligible number of bright spots was observed for the Cu2O film with an OFR of 60%, as shown in the Supporting Information Fig. S1(f), which indicates that most of Cu was oxidized to form Cu2O.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) XRD profiles of the Cu2O films deposited at different OFRs from 10% to 60%. The pure Cu (OFR = 0%) film is also shown for comparison. (b) AES of pure Cu, Cu2O powderand Cu/Cu2O composite films deposited under OFRs of 40%, 50%, and 60%.

For convenience, the Cu/Cu2O composite films grown under an OFR of X% are denoted as Cu2O_X in the rest of the paper. To determine the elemental composition of the Cu/Cu2O composite films, Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) was performed to monitor the Cu LMM transition, as seen in Fig. 1(b). The peak at 918 eV corresponds to Cu0 bonding for an OFR of 0%. With the increase of OFR, the characteristic AES peak shifts toward lower kinetic energy (917.5 eV for Cu2O_40 and 917.2 eV for Cu2O_50), reflecting the increase of the Cu2O component in the composite film. For Cu2O_60, the characteristic peak at 916.6 eV is very close to the energy of Cu+ bonding in Cu2O powder (916.2 eV)33. This shows that the films produced with high OFR exhibit spectra close to that of pure Cu2O.

To investigate the energy level and the relative position of the Fermi level with respect to the valence band maximum (∆EVB) of the Cu/Cu2O composite films, ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy were performed, as shown in Fig. 2. Figure 2(a) shows the full UPS spectra and Fig. 2(b) shows a magnification of the spectra near the valence band region from Fig. 2(a). The Au metal rectifies the Fermi energy level position at 0 eV, and the obtained ∆EVB of the Cu2O_60 film is 0.55 eV. The corresponding band gap (Eg) determined from the PL spectra (Fig. 2(c)) is 2.07 eV and the work function of Au is approximately 4.7 eV34. The peak values in Fig. 2(b) correspond to the energies between the valence band maximum (VBM) and the work function, and the VBM position of the Cu2O_60 was determined to be approximately −5.25 eV. The conduction band minimum (CBM) of the Cu2O_60 is −3.18 eV that was determined by the addition of Eg to the VBM. The energy level of the Cu2O_60 film along with other commonly-used inorganic HTMs is plotted in Fig. 2(d) for comparison. It is noted that the VBM of Cu/Cu2O film is compatible with the other HTMs, suggesting that Cu/Cu2O film can effectively extract the hole carrier from perovskite.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) Full UPS characterization and (b) UPS spectra of the valence band region near the Fermi level for Au and the Cu/Cu2O composite films. (c) PL spectrum of the Cu2O_60 film with a band gap of 2.07 eV. (d) Schematic energy level alignment of various HTMs including Cu2O film for comparison.

The electrical properties of the Cu/Cu2O composite films were analyzed by Hall effect measurements and a four-point probe method, and are summarized in Table 1. Figure S2 presents the Hall effect measurements of Cu/Cu2O composite films at variant OFRs. The Cu2O_40, Cu2O_50, and Cu2O_60 films have been determined to be p-type semiconducting materials. As evidenced from the Hall effect measurements shown in Fig. S2(a), for OFR = 30% the Cu/Cu2O composite film is a n-type semiconductor, which is not of interest for HTM application. The Cu2O_60 film is nearly insulating (sheet resistance ~83 kΩ/square) owing to the high volume ratio of Cu2O. The sheet resistances of the Cu2O_40 and Cu2O_50 films are 72.5 and 210.1 Ω/square, respectively, and the corresponding hole mobilities are 1.87 and 1.23 cm2/V-s, which are at least three orders of magnitude higher than the organic hole transport layers of spiro-OMeTAD (1.6 × 10−4~1.6 × 10−3 cm2/V-s). Notably, the hole mobility of the Cu2O_60 film is as high as 60.5 cm2/V-s. The hole carrier concentrations of the Cu2O_40, Cu2O_50, and Cu2O_60 films are 2.3 × 1022, and 6.19 × 1017 cm−3, respectively.

Table 1.

Electrical properties of the Cu/Cu2O films under different oxygen flow ratios (OFRs) and that of spiro-OMeTAD for comparison.

OFR (%) Thickness (nm) Type Sheet Resistance (Ω/square) Mobility (cm2/V-s) Bulk Concentration (cm−3)
40 20 p 72.5 1.87 2.3 × 1022
50 20 p 210.1 1.23 1.54 × 1022
60 20 p 83360 60.5 6.19 × 1017
spiro-OMeTAD/tBP/LiTFSI 100–200 p 1.6 × 10−4
1.6 × 10−3

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was employed to analyze the chemical compositions of the composite Cu/Cu2O films grown with different OFRs. Figure 3(a–d) show the XPS spectra of Cu 2p3/2 core level. All the films exhibit characteristic peaks at 932.3 eV and 933.1 eV that are respectively corresponding to copper(I) oxide and copper metal as reported in the literature35,36. By deconvoluting the signal and integrating the individual area, the ratio of Cu to Cu2O for Cu2O_30, Cu2O_40, Cu2O_50 and Cu2O_60 films are estimated to be 0.79, 0.50, 0.22 and 0.05, respectively. The Cu/Cu2O ratio as a function of oxygen flow ratios is shown in Fig. 3(e), indicating that the Cu content decreases with the oxygen flow. The tendency of Cu content in the sputtered film is consistent with the SEM results.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Cu 2p3/2 XPS spectra of (a) Cu2O_30, (b) Cu2O_40, (c) Cu2O_50, and (d) Cu2O_60 films. (e) Plot of Cu content vs. oxygen flow ratios obtained by deconvoluting XPS peak and integrating corresponding area. The dashed curve is a guide for eyes.

Devices

The device architecture is based on the n-i-p heterojunction configuration which is composed of FTO/cp-TiO2/mp-TiO2/CH3NH3PbI3/spiro-OMeTAD/Cu2O_X/Ag, as shown in Fig. 4(a). The standard (reference) device is the one without the Cu2O_X film interlayer. The active layer of the CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite was prepared by solvent engineering37, while the Cu2O_X interlayer was grown by sputtering on a Cu target by tuning the OFR over a 5 min period. The thickness of the Cu2O_X films are approximately 20 nm, as estimated by the cross-sectional SEM images (cf. Fig. S1 in Supporting Information). For convenience and clarity, the energy level diagram of the device is depicted in Fig. 4(b).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) Device illustration and (b) the corresponding band diagram of the general device architecture.

Figure 5(a) shows the current density-voltage (J-V) curves of the Cu2O_X based perovskite solar cells (with active area of 0.09 cm2) prepared with varying OFRs, and the corresponding photovoltaic parameters are summarized in Table 2. Amongst these devices, the Cu2O_60 device had a short circuit current density (Jsc) of 22.46 mA/cm2, open circuit voltage (Voc) of 1.03 V, and fill factor (FF) of 74.1%, resulting in the best PCE of 17.11% under AM 1.5 G illumination. Produced under similar fabrication conditions, the PSCs incorporating Cu2O_40 and Cu2O_50 layers show Jsc of 21.52 and 21.97 mA/cm2, Voc of 1.03 and 0.95 V, FFs of 73.18 and 72%, and PCEs of 16.21 and 14.98%, respectively. The reference device without Cu2O_X showed a Jsc of 19.02 mA/cm2, Voc of 0.997 V, FF of 73.63%, and PCE of 13.97%. The incorporation of the Cu2O_X interlayer serves as a bridge between the organic HTM (spiro-OMeTAD) and the metal electrode (Ag), and facilitates hole transport in the device owing to the high hole conductivity of the Cu/Cu2O composite films. Notably, the electron mobility of TiO2 ranges from 0.1–10 cm2/V-s38,39, while the hole mobility of Cu2O_X is typically between 1–60.5 cm2/V-s. Unbalanced ambipolar transport may be the main cause of the hysteresis observed in the prepared devices4042. The introduction of spiro-OMeTAD not only protects the perovskite active layer during sputtering deposition but also acts as an electron blocking layer, as schematically illustrated in Fig. 4(b). Figure 5(b) shows the incident photon-to-electron conversion efficiency (IPCE) spectra of the four fabricated devices. The devices with Cu2O_40 and Cu2O_50 layers show good responses with maximum values of approximately 80% in the range of 400 to 700 nm. The IPCE is approximately 90% for the Cu2O_60 incorporated device over the same wavelength range. The IPCE spectra reveal that the Cu2O_40, Cu2O_50, and Cu2O_60 incorporated devices yield higher responses and photocurrents than the standard device. Figure S3 (Supporting Information) shows the statistical distribution of the photovoltaic parameters resulted from 15 devices for Cu2O_60-based PSCs as well as 15 standard devices for comparison. The results show that the Cu2O_60-based device exhibits better efficiency than the reference devices. We further enlarge active area of 2.06 cm2 for Cu2O_60 based perovskite solar cell which exhibits a Jsc of 21.66 mA/cm2, Voc of 1.0 V, FF of 42.47%, and PCE of 9.22% and its corresponding J-V curve is shown in Supporting Information Fig. S4. It can be found that the device with large 2.06 cm2 active area is lower than that of the smaller 0.09 cm2 active area ones due to the poor FF. The reducing FF is mainly resulted from the increasing sheet resistance of FTO substrate that raises the probability of the charge recombination before carrier extracted by electrode43,44.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(a) J-V characteristics of perovskite solar cells without and with Cu2O_X (X = 40, 50 and 60) for active area of 0.09 cm2. (b) IPCE curves and integrated current density for corresponding PSCs.

Table 2.

Photovoltaic parameters of the Cu2O-based perovskite solar cells with varying OFRs. The standard spiro-OMeTAD device without Cu2O is shown for comparison.

Device (0.09 cm2) Voc (V) Jsc (mA/cm2) FF (%) PCE (%) Rs (Ω) Rsh (Ω)
w/o Cu2O 0.997 19.02 73.63 13.97 48.81 14.8 k
Cu2O_40 1.03 21.52 73.18 16.21 79.13 16.36 k
Cu2O_50 0.95 21.97 72.0 14.98 53.99 2.77 k
Cu2O_60 1.03 22.46 74.1 17.11 60.68 6.95 k

Stability Test

Finally, we monitor the long-term device stability of the normalized efficiency for the encapsulated Cu2O_60-based devices along with the standard cell and the results are shown in Fig. 6(a). When stored in the dark, the efficiency of the standard device drops rapidly after 12 days, while the devices with the Cu/Cu2O composite films show long-term stability for at least 30 days. The results demonstrate that p-type Cu/Cu2O composite films are promising candidates for the modification of the HTM property for high efficiency PSCs, while simultaneously acting as a protecting layer. The devices with the Cu/Cu2O composite film were transferred to a light soaking condition (one sun illumination). The aging test indicated that approximately 67% of the initial efficiency is retained after 50 h, as shown in Fig. 6(b).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

(a) Stability test of the encapsulated devices without Cu2O_60 and with Cu2O_60 under dark conditions. (b) Stability test of the device with Cu2O_60 under continuous lighting.

Discussion

In summary, p-type Cu/Cu2O composite films with a tunable Cu/Cu2O ratio were fabricated by controlling the oxygen flow rate during the ion beam sputtering of Cu targets. The resistance and mobility of the Cu/Cu2O composite films can be controlled to optimize the device performance of the PSCs with an n-i-p heterojunction configuration. In comparison to the standard device, the PCEs of the devices incorporating Cu/Cu2O composite films are significantly improved. Furthermore, the Cu/Cu2O composite films can effectively protect the perovskite active layer and enhance the lifetime of the PSCs.

Methods

Fabrication of standard perovskite solar cells

The fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass was etched with zinc powder and hydrochloric acid (1 M) to house two electrodes, which were cleaned by an ultrasonic soap, water, and ethanol bath and then rinsed with deionized water. A 70-nm-thick TiO2 compact layer (cp-TiO2) was deposited on the cleaned FTO substrates by spray pyrolysis of a titanium diisopropoxide bis(acetylacetonate) (75 wt.% in isopropanol, Aldrich) precursor solution diluted in ethanol (1:39 v:v), at 485 °C for 30 min. This was followed by the deposition of a 20 mM TiCl4 solution layer, which functions as an electron transport layer (ETL). The mesoporous TiO2 layer (mp-TiO2) was formed by spin-coating a diluted TiO2 solution (1:8.5 v:v) at 4000 rpm for 30 s followed by sintering at 500 °C for 30 min. The CH3NH3PbI3 precursor was prepared inside a nitrogen-filled glove box with oxygen and moisture levels <1 ppm by mixing 0.288 g of CH3NH3I (dyesol, 99.99%) with 0.831 g of PbI2 (Aldrich, 99.999%, ultra-dry) in a 1:1 equimolar ratio. The components were dissolved in a mixture of γ-butyrolactone (GBL) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (6:4 v:v) and heated at 50 °C under stirring for 12 h for complete dissolution. CH3NH3PbI3 was then spin-coated onto the FTO/cp-TiO2/mp-TiO2 substrate at 1000 rpm for 10 s and at 5000 rpm for 30 s, and the anti-solvent toluene was injected for 15 s in the second spin step. The spin-coated perovskite film was dried at 100 °C for 10 min to remove the toluene. The spiro-OMeTAD solution was prepared by dissolving 72.3 mg of spiro-OMeTAD, 28.8 μL of tert-butylpyridine (tBP), and 17.5 μL of lithium-bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (Li-TFSI) (from a stock solution of 520 mg/mL of Li-TFSI in acetonitrile (Aldrich, 99.8%)) in 1 mL of chlorobenzene. The spiro-OMeTAD solution was then spin coated onto the MAPbI3 substrate at 4000 rpm for 20 s. Finally, a 60-nm-thick silver layer was thermally evaporated to form the counter electrode.

Fabrication of Cu2O-based perovskite solar cells

The MAPbI3 substrates were fabricated as described above. The spiro-OMeTAD serves as a buffer layer, and an ion beam sputtering system was used to deposit the Cu/Cu2O films. The vacuum chamber was evacuated to a base pressure of 2.2 × 10−6 torr. A copper substrate (99.99% purity) was used as the sputtering target. The Cu/Cu2O films were grown at room temperature (~30 °C) with different Ar and O2 flow rates.

Characterization

The crystallographic properties of the films were determined by grazing incidence X-ray diffraction using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å, D8, Bruker, Germany) at room temperature with a scanning step size of 0.005°. The surface morphology and cross-section of the samples were analyzed by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (SUPRATM 55). The carrier type, carrier concentration, and electrical resistivity were measured using a four-terminal van der Pauw configuration at room temperature. The UPS and XPS experiment were performed at beamline 24 A of the Taiwan Light Source in the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (NSRRC). A microscopic PL system (MRI, Protrustech Co., Ltd., Taiwan) was used to determine the band gap of the films with a pumping wavelength of 532 nm. The J-V measurement was performed using a solar simulator (SS-F5-3A, Enlitech) with AM 1.5 G spectra and the device was connected to a source meter (Keithley 2401) for recording the J-V data. The light intensity was calibrated using reference silicon solar cells to be 100 mW/cm2. The scan rate was 1 V/s for the forward scan (from Jsc to Voc). A metal mask with an aperture size of 0.09 cm2 was used to define the active area. A 300 W intensity monochromatic (Newport Cornerstone 260) xenon lamp (Newport) and a source meter (Keithley 2401) were integrated to measure the IPCE response of the devices.

Electronic supplementary material

Acknowledgements

Prof. J. C. A. Huang is grateful for the research grant from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of Taiwan under contract numbers 103-2923-M-006-001-MY3 and 104-2119-M-006-018-MY3. Prof. Chen thanks MOST of Taiwan for the research grant under contract numbers 103-2221-E-006-029-MY3, 105-2623-E-006-002-ET, and 104-2119-M-006-004. The authors acknowledge financial support from the Top-Notch Project under the Headquarter of University Advancement at National Cheng Kung University, which is sponsored by the Ministry of Education, Taiwan. Funding from the Advanced Optoelectronic Technology Center (AOTC), Research Center for Energy Technology and Strategy (RCETS), and National Cheng Kung University is also acknowledged. The authors would also like to thank Dr. J. F. Lee of the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (NSRRC) for valuable technical support.

Author Contributions

Prof. J.C.A. Huang and Prof. Peter Chen contributed to the conception and design of the research and experiment. Y.J. Chen and M.H. Li carried out film preparation and characterization, device fabrication and performance measurements. Y.J. Chen analyzed data and wrote the manuscript with the assistance of Dr. M.H. Li, Prof. J.C.A. Huang, and Prof. Peter Chen. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-25975-8.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Jung-Chun-Andrew Huang, Email: jcahuang@mail.ncku.edu.tw.

Peter Chen, Email: petercyc@mail.ncku.edu.tw.

References

  • 1.Kojima A, Teshima K, Shirai Y, Miyasaka T. Organometal halide perovskites as visible-light sensitizers for photovoltaic cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:6050–6051. doi: 10.1021/ja809598r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Best research-cell efficiencies. National Renewable Energy Laboratoryhttps://www.nrel.gov/pv/assets/images/efficiency-chart.png (2018).
  • 3.Yu Z, Sun L. Recent Progress on Hole‐Transporting Materials for Emerging Organometal Halide Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energ. Mater. 2015;5:12. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yan W, et al. Hole‐Transporting Materials in Inverted Planar Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energ. Mater. 2016;6:17. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Teh CH, et al. A review of organic small molecule-based hole-transporting materials for meso-structured organic–inorganic perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2016;4:15788–15822. doi: 10.1039/C6TA06987H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Li M-H, Yum J-H, Moon S-J, Chen P. Inorganic p-type semiconductors: their applications and progress in dye-sensitized solar cells and perovskite solar cells. Energies. 2016;9:331. doi: 10.3390/en9050331. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li M-H, Shen P-S, Wang K-C, Guo T-F, Chen P. Inorganic p-type contact materials for perovskite-based solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2015;3:9011–9019. doi: 10.1039/C4TA06425A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Calió L, Kazim S, Grätzel M, Ahmad S. Hole‐Transport Materials for Perovskite Solar Cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015;55:14522. doi: 10.1002/anie.201601757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen W-Y, et al. Low-cost solution-processed copper iodide as an alternative to PEDOT: PSS hole transport layer for efficient and stable inverted planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2015;3:19353–19359. doi: 10.1039/C5TA05286F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nejand BA, Ahmadi V, Gharibzadeh S, Shahverdi HR. Cuprous oxide as a potential low‐cost hole‐transport material for stable perovskite solar cells. ChemSusChem. 2016;9:302. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201501273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nejand BA, Ahmadi V, Shahverdi HR. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015. New physical deposition approach for low cost inorganic hole transport layer in normal architecture of durable perovskite solar cells; pp. 21807–21818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chavhan S, et al. Organo-metal halide perovskite-based solar cells with CuSCN as the inorganic hole selective contact. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2014;2:12754–12760. doi: 10.1039/C4TA01310G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Christians JA, Fung RC, Kamat PV. An inorganic hole conductor for organo-lead halide perovskite solar cells. Improved hole conductivity with copper iodide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:758–764. doi: 10.1021/ja411014k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Huangfu M, et al. Copper iodide as inorganic hole conductor for perovskite solar cells with different thickness of mesoporous layer and hole transport layer. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015;357:2234–2240. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.09.215. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ito S, Tanaka S, Nishino H. Lead-Halide Perovskite Solar Cells by CH3NH3I Dripping on PbI2–CH3NH3I–DMSO Precursor Layer for Planar and Porous Structures Using CuSCN Hole-Transporting Material. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015;6:881–886. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Madhavan VE, et al. Copper thiocyanate inorganic hole-transporting material for high-efficiency perovskite solar cells. ACS Energy Lett. 2016;1:1112–1117. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00501. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Qin P, et al. Inorganic hole conductor-based lead halide perovskite solar cells with 12.4% conversion efficiency. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:3834. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sepalage GA, et al. Copper (I) iodide as hole‐conductor in planar perovskite solar cells: probing the origin of J–V hysteresis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015;25:5650–5661. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201502541. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chen C, et al. Magnetic properties of undoped Cu2O fine powders with magnetic impurities and/or cation vacancies. J. Phys. Condens. Mat. 2009;21:145601. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/14/145601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yin M, et al. Copper oxide nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:9506–9511. doi: 10.1021/ja050006u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kudryashov, D, et al The temperature dependence of the electrical conductivity in Cu2O thin films grown by magnetron sputtering. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing (2016).
  • 22.Li H-B, et al. Electronic Structure and Ferromagnetism Modulation in Cu/Cu2O Interface: Impact of Interfacial Cu Vacancy and Its Diffusion. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:15191. doi: 10.1038/srep15191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Murali DS, et al. Synthesis of Cu2O from CuO thin films: Optical and electrical properties. AIP Adv. 5. 2015;4:047143. doi: 10.1063/1.4919323. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yu X, Zhang X, Wang S, Feng G. A first principle study on the magnetic properties of Cu2O surfaces. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2015;15:1303–1311. doi: 10.1016/j.cap.2015.06.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhu H, et al. Cu2O thin films deposited by reactive direct current magnetron sputtering. Thin Solid Films. 2009;517:5700–5704. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.02.127. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chatterjee S, Pal AJ. Introducing Cu2O thin films as a hole-transport layer in efficient planar perovskite solar cell structures. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2016;120:1428–1437. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11540. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sun W, et al. High-performance inverted planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells based on a solution-processed CuOx hole transport layer. Nanoscale. 2016;8:10806–10813. doi: 10.1039/C6NR01927G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang Y, et al. Towards printed perovskite solar cells with cuprous oxide hole transporting layers: a theoretical design. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2015;30:054004. doi: 10.1088/0268-1242/30/5/054004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yu W, et al. Ultrathin Cu2O as an efficient inorganic hole transporting material for perovskite solar cells. Nanoscale. 2016;8:6173–6179. doi: 10.1039/C5NR07758C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zuo C, Ding L. Solution‐Processed Cu2O and CuO as Hole Transport Materials for Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells. Small. 2015;11:5528–5532. doi: 10.1002/smll.201501330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chen L-C, et al. Nano-structured CuO-Cu2O complex thin film for application in CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2016;11:402. doi: 10.1186/s11671-016-1621-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liu Z, et al. p-Type mesoscopic NiO as an active interfacial layer for carbon counter electrode based perovskite solar cells. Dalton Trans. 2015;44:3967–3973. doi: 10.1039/C4DT02904F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Panzner G, Egert B, Schmidt HP. The stability of CuO and Cu2O surfaces during argon sputtering studied by XPS and AES. Surf. Sci. 1985;151:400–408. doi: 10.1016/0039-6028(85)90383-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sun B, Hong W, Aziz H, Li Y. A pyridine-flanked diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP)-based donor–acceptor polymer showing high mobility in ambipolar and n-channel organic thin film transistors. Polym. Chem. 2015;6:938–945. doi: 10.1039/C4PY01193G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ertl G, Hierl R, Knözinger H, Thiele N, Urbach HP. XPS study of copper aluminate catalysts. Applications of Surface Science. 1980;5:49–64. doi: 10.1016/0378-5963(80)90117-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Haber J, Machej T, Ungier L, Ziółkowski J. ESCA studies of copper oxides and copper molybdates. Journal of Solid State Chemistry. 1978;25:207–218. doi: 10.1016/0022-4596(78)90105-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jeon NJ, et al. Solvent engineering for high-performance inorganic–organic hybrid perovskite solar cells. Nat. Mater. 2014;13:897–903. doi: 10.1038/nmat4014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Krasienapibal TS, Fukumura T, Hirose Y, Hasegawa T. Improved room temperature electron mobility in self-buffered anatase TiO2 epitaxial thin film grown at low temperature. Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 2014;53:090305. doi: 10.7567/JJAP.53.090305. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tachikawa T, et al. Metal-to-insulator transition in anatase TiO2 thin films induced by growth rate modulation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012;101:022104. doi: 10.1063/1.4733724. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Eames C, et al. Ionic transport in hybrid lead iodide perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:7497. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Reenen SV, Kemerink M, Snaith HJ. Modeling anomalous hysteresis in perovskite solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015;6:3808–3814. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yang D, et al. Surface optimization to eliminate hysteresis for record efficiency planar perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016;9:3071–3078. doi: 10.1039/C6EE02139E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chen W, et al. Efficient and stable large-area perovskite solar cells with inorganic charge extraction layers. Science. 2015;350:944–948. doi: 10.1126/science.aad1015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yang Z, et al. An up-scalable approach to CH3NH3PbI3 compact films for high-performance perovskite solar cells. Nano Energy. 2015;15:670–678. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.05.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES