Skip to main content
The Journal of Neuroscience logoLink to The Journal of Neuroscience
. 2018 May 16;38(20):4655–4665. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3251-17.2018

Mesocorticolimbic Connectivity and Volumetric Alterations in DCC Mutation Carriers

Daniel E Vosberg 1,3,*, Yu Zhang 2,*, Aurore Menegaux 4,7,8, Amanda Chalupa 1, Colleen Manitt 4, Simone Zehntner 6, Conrad Eng 4, Kristina DeDuck 2, Dominique Allard 1, France Durand 1, Alain Dagher 2,3, Chawki Benkelfat 1,2,3, Myriam Srour 2, Ridha Joober 1,3,4, Franco Lepore 5, Guy Rouleau 2, Hugo Théoret 5, Barry J Bedell 2, Cecilia Flores 1,2,3,4,, Marco Leyton 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC5956985  PMID: 29712788

Abstract

The axon guidance cue receptor DCC (deleted in colorectal cancer) plays a critical role in the organization of mesocorticolimbic pathways in rodents. To investigate whether this occurs in humans, we measured (1) anatomical connectivity between the substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area (SN/VTA) and forebrain targets, (2) striatal and cortical volumes, and (3) putatively associated traits and behaviors. To assess translatability, morphometric data were also collected in Dcc-haploinsufficient mice. The human volunteers were 20 DCC+/− mutation carriers, 16 DCC+/+ relatives, and 20 DCC+/+ unrelated healthy volunteers (UHVs; 28 females). The mice were 11 Dcc+/− and 16 wild-type C57BL/6J animals assessed during adolescence and adulthood. Compared with both control groups, the human DCC+/− carriers exhibited the following: (1) reduced anatomical connectivity from the SN/VTA to the ventral striatum [DCC+/+: p = 0.0005, r(effect size) = 0.60; UHV: p = 0.0029, r = 0.48] and ventral medial prefrontal cortex (DCC+/+: p = 0.0031, r = 0.53; UHV: p = 0.034, r = 0.35); (2) lower novelty-seeking scores (DCC+/+: p = 0.034, d = 0.82; UHV: p = 0.019, d = 0.84); and (3) reduced striatal volume (DCC+/+: p = 0.0009, d = 1.37; UHV: p = 0.0054, d = 0.93). Striatal volumetric reductions were also present in Dcc+/− mice, and these were seen during adolescence (p = 0.0058, d = 1.09) and adulthood (p = 0.003, d = 1.26). Together these findings provide the first evidence in humans that an axon guidance gene is involved in the formation of mesocorticolimbic circuitry and related behavioral traits, providing mechanisms through which DCC mutations might affect susceptibility to diverse neuropsychiatric disorders.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Opportunities to study the effects of axon guidance molecules on human brain development have been rare. Here, the identification of a large four-generational family that carries a mutation to the axon guidance molecule receptor gene, DCC, enabled us to demonstrate effects on mesocorticolimbic anatomical connectivity, striatal volumes, and personality traits. Reductions in striatal volumes were replicated in DCC-haploinsufficient mice. Together, these processes might influence mesocorticolimbic function and susceptibility to diverse neuropsychiatric disorders.

Keywords: axon guidance, brain morphometry, diffusion MRI, genetics, nicotine, personality

Introduction

What guides the alignment of mesocorticolimbic pathways in humans? The processes are poorly understood, but the axon guidance molecule receptor DCC (deleted in colorectal cancer) might play an important role (Flores, 2011; Hoops and Flores, 2017). DCC is expressed throughout most of the nervous system during embryonic development (Gad et al., 1997; Livesey and Hunt, 1997; Harter et al., 2010) and continues to be expressed in adulthood in some regions, including the substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area (SN/VTA), striatum, hippocampus, and cortex (Gad et al., 1997; Livesey and Hunt, 1997; Osborne et al., 2005; Grant et al., 2007; Harter et al., 2010; Manitt et al., 2010; Reyes et al., 2013).

Mice haploinsufficient for the Dcc gene develop diverse alterations to mesocorticolimbic anatomy and related behaviors during the adolescent expansion of mesocortical dopamine projections (Hoops and Flores, 2017). Dcc haploinsufficiency in dopamine neurons causes mesolimbic dopamine axons normally retained in the striatum to continue to grow to the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) throughout adolescence (Reynolds et al., 2018). As a consequence, adult Dcc-haploinsufficient mice have increased mPFC dopamine innervation and dopamine release (Grant et al., 2007; Manitt et al., 2011; Pokinko et al., 2015). This is coupled with decreased spine density, dendritic arbor complexity, and excitability of mPFC layer V pyramidal neurons (Grant et al., 2007; Manitt et al., 2013). In the nucleus accumbens (NAcc), these same processes lead to reduced dopamine innervation and amphetamine-induced dopamine release (Flores et al., 2005; Grant et al., 2007; Pokinko et al., 2015; Reynolds et al., 2018). Behaviorally, adult Dcc-haploinsufficient mice exhibit blunted stimulant drug-induced responses, including reductions in locomotor activity, sensorimotor gating, conditioned place preference, and intracranial self-stimulation (Flores et al., 2005; Grant et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2013; Reynolds et al., 2016).

In the present study, we tested whether DCC-haploinsufficient humans exhibit mesocorticolimbic connectivity alterations and associated behavioral traits similar to those identified in Dcc-heterozygous mice. The sample comprised a large four-generational Quebec family, half of whom are carriers for an autosomal dominant mutation that induces DCC haploinsufficiency (Srour et al., 2009, 2010). Within the family, a genome-wide linkage analysis identified a DCC frameshift mutation (NM_005215.3, c.1140 + 1G>A) resulting from abnormal skipping of exon 6. This leads to a premature stop codon encoding a truncated DCC protein that fails to bind to its ligand, Netrin-1 (Srour et al., 2010).

To investigate alterations potentially associated with DCC-related susceptibility to psychiatric pathology, we tested whether DCC-haploinsufficient humans, compared with DCC wild-type family relatives and unrelated healthy volunteers (UHVs), exhibit (1) altered structural and functional connectivity between the midbrain and projection sites in the ventral striatum (VS) and mPFC, and (2) a behavioral phenotype consistent with low striatal dopamine transmission comprising diminished novelty-seeking and reward-sensitivity traits, decreased substance use, and increased punishment sensitivity (Leyton et al., 2002; Frank et al., 2004). Finally, using a translational cross-species magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) approach, we tested whether these effects might be associated with alterations in striatal and cortical brain volume. Automated morphometric analyses were conducted in the DCC-haploinsufficient human volunteers and Dcc-haploinsufficient C57BL/6 mice. The rodents were tested in both adolescence and adulthood to determine whether volumetric effects preceded or coincided with the previously demonstrated changes to dopamine neurons.

Materials and Methods

Human participants and data acquisition

Fifty-six volunteers participated in the study (28 males; age: 42.4 ± 15.3 years, 19–72 years old). Among them, 20 were DCC mutation carriers (DCC+/−; 11 males; age: 46.3 ± 16.1 years, 20–72 years old), 16 were age-matched relatives without the DCC mutation (DCC+/+; six males, 37.9 ± 13.0 years, 22–63 years old), and 20 were UHVs (11 males; age: 42.2 ± 15.4 years, 19–60 years old). Four participants were not interested in completing the neuroimaging procedures and three were physically unable to fit into the MRI scanner. Detailed information regarding the participants and the number who completed each task is provided in Table 1. A pedigree of the Quebec family is provided in Figure 1. Recruitment of family members was solely based on interest and safety. UHVs were all neurologically intact and free of current major psychiatric disorders, including substance-use disorders, except for one who met criteria for a possible mild mood disorder; excluding this individual did not change the results. All provided written informed consent to the study protocol, which was approved by the local research ethics committee.

Table 1.

Participant characteristics

UHV DCC+/+ relatives DCC+/− ANOVA or χ2 p value
N (Total) 20 16 20
N (MRI) 19 12 18
Age (mean ± SD) 41.8 ± 16.0 years 38.3 ± 13.2 years 46.2 ± 16.0 years p = 0.31
Sex (male/female) 11:9 6:10 11:9 p = 0.50
Handedness 19 right, 1 left 11 right, 3 left, 2 ambidextrous 15 right, 4 left, 1 ambidextrous p = 0.25
Sensitivity to punishment (mean ± SD) 6.8 ± 4.6 (n = 19) 6.9 ± 5.5 (n = 14) 8.4 ± 5.2 (n = 19) p = 0.59
Sensitivity to reward (mean ± SD) 9.7 ± 3.8 (n = 20) 8.1 ± 3.1 (n = 14) 9.4 ± 4.6 (n = 19) p = 0.48
Novelty seeking (mean ± SD) 104.8 ± 12.3* (n = 15) 104.2 ± 11.2* (n = 13) 94.9 ± 11.2 (n = 18) p = 0.03

Sample sizes, demographic characteristics, and personality traits for DCC+/− mutation carriers, DCC+/+ relatives, and UHVs. Asterisks (*) indicate p ≤ 0.05 compared to DCC+/− participants.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Pedigree of the Quebec family. Red indicates DCC+/−; blue indicates DCC+/+; white designates those who did not undergo genetic testing. Crossed lines designate deceased individuals. Squares are males; circles are females. * indicates previously genotyped (Srour et al., 2010) individuals who did not participate in the present study.

Genotyping.

All participants underwent genotyping either at assessment for the present study or previously (Srour et al., 2010). Genotyping was unavailable for one UHV and excluding this individual did not alter the findings. Coding exons and the exon–intron boundaries of the DCC gene were screened for mutations based on the sequence [NM_005215; UCSC (University of California, Santa Cruz) March 2006 Assembly hg18]. Primers were determined in a previous study of the family (Srour et al., 2010). PCR products were sequenced on the ABI 3700 Sequencer at the Genome Quebec Centre for Innovation according to the manufacturer's recommended protocol (Applied Biosystems). Sequences were aligned and analyzed using SeqMan 4.03 (DNAStar) and Mutation Surveyor v.3.1 (SoftGenetics).

Personality and substance-use measures.

Participants completed questionnaires assessing novelty seeking and sensitivity to punishment and reward. Novelty-seeking traits were measured using Cloninger's 240-item Temperament and Character Inventory (De Fruyt et al., 2000). Sensitivity to punishment and reward were measured with the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire, a 48-item scale developed to assess temperamental correlates of Gray's hypothesized behavioral activation and inhibition systems (Caseras et al., 2003). In a structured interview, self-reported weekly current substance use (e.g., drinks, cannabis, and tobacco cigarettes, etc.), lifetime substance use, and age of onset were evaluated for alcohol, cigarettes, and cannabis. Other substances were measured but not evaluated statistically because the number of self-reported users was too low. These comprised amphetamine, cocaine, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), heroin, ketamine, gamma hydroxybutyrate (GHB), ephedrine, steroids, psilocybin, and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD).

Human MRI.

Participants underwent anatomical, diffusion-weighted, and resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) acquisitions in a scanning session using a 3T Siemens Magnetom Trio MRI scanner (12-channel head coil). Forty-nine participants underwent diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) using a single-shot spin-echo echo-planar pulse sequence with multidirectional diffusion weighting [repetition time (TR) = 12 s, echo time (TE) = 89 ms; 90 contiguous axial slices with an isotropic 2 mm resolution; field of view (FOV), 256 × 256 mm2; matrix size, 128 × 128 with partial Fourier reconstructed to 6/8]. Diffusion weighting was distributed along 64 different directions using a b value of 1000 s/mm2. One additional volume with no diffusion weighting (i.e., b = 0) was acquired in the beginning of the acquisition. Using a T1-weighted 3D magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo sequence [200 axial slices; inversion time (TI) = 0.9 s; TR = 2.3 s; TE = 2.98 ms; FOV, 256 × 256 mm2; flip angle, 9°; final voxel resolution: 1 × 1 × 1 mm], a high-resolution anatomical scan was also acquired for each participant.

Immediately after the DTI, participants underwent the rs-fMRI acquisition. Forty-three participants, including 17 DCC+/−, 12 DCC+/+, and 14 UHV participants, completed resting-state scans. All participants were instructed to rest with their eyes closed, relax their minds, and remain as motionless as possible during the scanning. A total of 180 volumes, each covering the entire brain, including the cerebellum with 38 axial slices, were acquired using a gradient-echo echo planar imaging sequence (TR = 2000 ms; TE = 30 ms; FOV, 256 × 256 mm2; matrix, 64 × 64; slice thickness, 4 mm with no gaps; flip angle, 90°). Slices were acquired in a descending and interleaved manner.

Human voxel-based morphometry analysis.

Anatomical scans were preprocessed in SPM8 (www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm8) using the DARTEL (Diffeomorphic Anatomic Registration through Exponentiated Lie) and VBM8 toolbox (http://dbm.neuro.uni-jena.de/vbm8/). First, the structural MRI images were segmented into gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), CSF, bone, and soft tissue. The DARTEL algorithm registered these tissue segmentations back and forth with the default templates based on the ICBM152 brain, and finally generated population-specific tissue templates. GM and WM density images of all subjects were subsequently nonlinearly registered onto the corresponding template. In VBM8, all registered tissue images were modulated using the Jacobian determinants derived from the spatial normalization step and corrected for individual head size. The modulated GM and WM tissue images were then smoothed with an 8 mm full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) Gaussian kernel.

The Harvard-Oxford subcortical atlas with a 25% threshold (Desikan et al., 2006) was used to define four a priori selected regions: the caudate, putamen, accumbens, and hippocampus. The ventral mPFC (vmPFC) and mPFC/anterior cingulate cortex (mPFC/ACC) were defined by drawing a 6 mm sphere around the coordinates (vmPFC: x = ±6, y = 45, z = −9; mPFC/ACC: x = ±18, y = 42, z = 9; as explained below).

Human connectivity seed and target regions.

An SN seed mask was generated from a 7T MRI atlas of the basal ganglia based on high-resolution MP2RAGE and FLASH (fast low-angle shot) scans (Keuken and Forstmann, 2015) available at https://www.nitrc.org/projects/atag. The entire region of the SN (Fig. 2A) was extracted from the probabilistic atlas with a threshold of 33% of the population (i.e., ≥10 of 30 participants showing this nucleus) with an ∼300 mm3 volume in each hemisphere. Considering the low spatial resolution of our functional and diffusion data [4 mm isotropic for rs-fMRI and 2 mm for DTI], the seed might also cover part of the adjacent VTA. Here, we designated this seed region as the SN/VTA.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Depiction of human regions of interest. A, SN/VTA (black). B, VS (red). C, vmPFC (green). D, mPFC/ACC (blue). E, Hippocampus (purple).

Target regions comprised the VS and vmPFC, defined by drawing a 6 mm sphere around the peak coordinates (VS: x = ±12, y = 15, z = −6; vmPFC: x = ±6, y = 45, z = −9), acquired from a recent fMRI meta-analysis of subjective value (Bartra et al., 2013; Fig. 2B,C). Other regions, including the hippocampus (x = ±24, y = −9, z= −15) and the mPFC/ACC (x = ±18, y = 42, z = 9), identified from the whole-brain functional connectivity analysis, were also included in the anatomical and functional connectivity analyses (Fig. 2D,E).

Human diffusion-weighted imaging preprocessing.

The diffusion MR data were preprocessed using the FMRIB's Diffusion Toolbox [FMRIB (Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain) Software Library (FSL) version 5.0; http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/FSL], including eddy current correction, calculation of the principal directions in diffusion tensors, and estimation of the probabilistic distribution of fiber orientations. Specifically, motion artifacts and eddy current distortions were corrected by using affine registration of diffusion-weighted images to the nondiffusion-weighted images (b = 0 s/mm2). Then, a diffusion tensor model was fitted for each voxel to estimate the principal fiber directions and a fractional-anisotropy (FA) and mean-diffusivity (MD) map was calculated. Next, the probabilistic distribution of fiber orientations was estimated using FSL's BEDPOSTX with a maximum of two fiber directions per voxel (Behrens et al., 2007). The skull-stripped T1-weighted image from each participant was then linearly registered into the diffusion space by using rigid-body alignment of the anatomical image to the FA image. This coregistered T1-weighted image was further nonlinearly registered to the ICBM152 brain template (http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/ServicesAtlases/ICBM152NLin2009) using FNIRT (FMRIB's Nonlinear Image Registration Tool) from the FSL package. The reverse transformation was then obtained and used to nonlinearly register the seed region from MNI standard space to native diffusion space.

Human anatomical connectivity profile.

We mapped the anatomical connectivity profile of the SN/VTA by performing probabilistic tractography with 10,000 streamline fibers per voxel within the seed region using FSL's PROBTRACKX. The number of fibers passing through each target region represents the strength of connectivity between the seed and target region. The resulting connectivity maps were first normalized by the size of seed region and total number of streamlines (i.e., 10,000) to generate the relative tracing strength from the seed to the rest of the brain. The resulting individual tractograms were combined to generate a population map of the major fiber projections from the SN/VTA. The relative connection probability from the SN/VTA to each target area was then calculated by averaging the tractography values of the population fiber-tract maps.

In addition to the tractography analysis, we also investigated group differences in FA and MD in the whole-brain WM skeletons, including tracts between the SN/VTA and the target regions, using Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) from FSL (Smith et al., 2006). Threshold-free cluster enhancement was used to correct for multiple comparisons (Smith and Nichols, 2009). The mean FA and MD values within the SN/VTA and other target areas were also calculated.

Human resting-state functional connectivity preprocessing.

The rs-fMRI datasets were preprocessed using a revised script based on the 1000 Functional Connectome Project (www.nitrc.org/projects/fcon_1000; Biswal et al., 2010) using both FSL and AFNI (Automated Functional NeuroImaging; http://afni.nimh.nih.gov/afni). The preprocessing steps included the following: (1) discarding the first 10 volumes in each scan series for signal equilibration, (2) performing slice timing correction and motion correction, (3) removing the linear and quadratic trends, (4) bandpass temporal filtering (0.01 Hz < f < 0.08 Hz), (5) spatial smoothing using a 6 mm FWHM Gaussian kernel, (6) performing nuisance signal regression (including WM, CSF, the global signal, and six motion parameters), and (7) resampling into MNI space with the concatenated transformations, including rigid transformation from the mean functional volume to the individual anatomical volume via FLIRT (FMRIB's Linear Image Registration Tool; Jenkinson and Smith, 2001) followed by spatial normalization of the individual anatomical volume to the MNI152 brain template (3 mm isotropic resolution) using FNIRT (Andersson et al., 2007). Finally, a four-dimensional time-series dataset in standard MNI space with 3 mm isotropic resolution was obtained for each participant after preprocessing.

Human resting-state functional connectivity.

The mean time course of the seed SN/VTA was extracted individually to calculate whole-brain functional connectivity using Pearson's correlation along with normalization by Fisher's z transform. As a result, a z-score connectivity map was generated for each individual. To detect the effect of the DCC mutation on projections from the SN/VTA, a two-sample t test in SPM was performed on these connectivity maps (DCC+/− vs DCC+/+) and additionally corrected for multiple comparisons using false discovery rate (FDR) corrected p = 0.05 with cluster size ≥ 540 mm3. The functional connectivity between the SN/VTA and our predefined target areas (including the VS and vmPFC) were also calculated using Pearson's correlation and transformed into z scores.

Experimental design and statistical analyses of human data.

Group differences in personality traits, substance use, GM volume, and connectivity measures were examined with χ2 analyses and one-way ANOVAs followed by t-test planned comparisons, comparing each control group to the DCC+/− group using both MATLAB15b for Linux and Graphpad Prism 7 for Windows. For nonparametric data, Kruskal–Wallis followed by Mann–Whitney U tests were conducted, comparing each control group to the DCC+/− group. Effect sizes were computed, specifically Cohen's d for parametric pairwise comparisons and r = ZN for nonparametric pairwise comparisons (Fritz et al., 2012).

To investigate associations between SN/VTA connectivity and personality traits, we performed Pearson and Spearman partial correlation analyses, as appropriate to the data, between both functional and anatomical connectivity and novelty seeking, sensitivity to punishment, sensitivity to reward, and lifetime substance use. Age and gender were used as covariates of no interest. For Pearson correlation analyses, outliers were removed before calculating the correlation coefficients, which were identified based on robust regression weights (Rousseeuw and Hubert, 2011). Additionally, for lifetime substance use, log transformations were performed before the correlations due to a large nonlinear range in the values. Participants who reported zero or one current or lifetime substance use were removed from these group and correlation analyses because these values skewed the distributions.

Dcc-haploinsufficient mice

Male Dcc-haploinsufficient mice were originally obtained from Dr. Susan Ackerman. They were maintained on a C57BL/6J (BL/6) background and bred with female BL/6 mice from The Jackson Laboratory. Volumetric differences were characterized between male Dcc-haploinsufficient (n = 11) and wild-type (n = 16) mice during adolescence [postnatal day (P) 33 ± 2], and, again, in the same animals, in adulthood (P75 ± 15). Mice were kept on a 12 h light/dark cycle with ad libitum access to food and water. They were weaned at P20 and housed with same-sex littermates. In Dcc-haploinsufficient mice, the Dcc gene was inactivated using homologous recombination by the insertion of a neomycin resistance cassette into exon 3, which encodes most of the second Ig-like domain of the protein. The proper targeting of the gene and complete loss of DCC expression were validated by Southern and Western blot analyses, respectively (Fazeli et al., 1997). Mouse genotypes were verified by PCR amplification of genomic DNA at an annealing temperature of 54°C for 30 cycles with the primers DCC code (GGT CAT TGA GGT TCC TTT), DCC reverse (AAG ACG ACC ACA CGC GAC), and DCC Neo (TCC TCG TGC TTT ACG GTA TC). All experiments and procedures were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Canadian Council of Animal Care and the McGill University/Douglas Mental Health University Institute Animal Care Committee.

Mouse MRI acquisition.

MRI was performed using a 7 tesla Bruker BioSpec 70/30 USR at the Douglas Brain Imaging Center (Montreal, Canada) using a transmit circularly polarized resonator and a dedicated mouse brain receive-only circularly polarized surface coil (Bruker). Mice were immobilized in a prone position on a water-heated mat. Anesthesia was induced with 5% isoflurane for 2 min and maintained with 2% isoflurane for the duration of the experiment. Anatomical images of brains within skulls were acquired using the standard Bruker 3D-TrueFISP pulse sequence with the following parameters: TE = 2.6 ms; TR = 5.2 ms; number of excitations, 2; effective bandwidth, 50,000 Hz; FOV, 1.80 × 1.80 × 0.9 cm; matrix size, 128 × 128 × 64; final spatial resolution; 141 μm isotropic voxels. To reduce banding artifacts, eight radio frequency phase advance values were used: 180, 0, 90, 270, 45, 225, 135, and 315°. These resulted in 16 averages overall. Final images were root mean square averages of these phase advances. The total scan time for each animal was <40 min.

Segmentation of regions of interest.

The a priori selected regions of interest were four mesocorticolimbic terminal regions: the mPFC, dorsal striatum, NAcc, and hippocampus (Fig. 3A–C). Within the inner layers of the mPFC, three regions were analyzed: the cingulate 1, prelimbic, and infralimbic cortices. An anatomical template was generated from the nonlinear average of the 54 scans. A single rater performed manual segmentation of the structures of interest on the group template using the Display software package (http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/software/Display/Display.html; Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Canada). Structures were delineated in the coronal orientation slice by slice while comparing the other two orientations and the adjacent slices to the Mouse Brain Atlas (Paxinos and Franklin, 2004). Because the template was symmetric, tracings of the left hemisphere of the template brain were flipped to the right hemisphere. The third and lateral ventricles were segmented first to define the boundaries of the dorsal striatum and NAcc. After each structure was labeled, its boundaries were checked again and corrections were made in reference to all three orientations. The volumes of each structure were determined for every animal via fully automated, volume-based morphometry using NIGHTWING software (Biospective).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Depiction of mouse regions of interest. A, Striatum including the NAcc (green) and dorsal striatum (red). B, Hippocampus (purple). C, Cingulate-1 (orange), prelimbic (blue), and infralimbic (yellow) mPFC subregions.

Experimental design and statistical analyses of mouse data.

Differences in volume were analyzed using two-way ANOVAs with genotype and age as between-group and within-group variables, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 7 for Windows.

Results

Human participant characteristics

The groups were well matched for age, sex, and handedness (Table 1). As hypothesized, the novelty-seeking data analysis yielded a main effect of group (F(2,43) = 3.74, p = 0.032) reflecting decreased scores among DCC+/− participants, compared with the DCC+/+ relatives [T(43) = 2.19, p = 0.034, effect size(d) = 0.82] and UHVs [T(43) = 2.44, p = 0.019, effect size(d) = 0.84; Fig. 4A]. Intriguingly, DCC+/− participants, compared with DCC+/+ relatives, also reported significantly lower lifetime cigarette smoking [U = 17, p = 0.026, effect size(r) = 0.51] and trends for decreased current cigarette use [T(11) = 1.87, p = 0.089, effect size(d) = 1.04] as well as a later age of onset for cigarette use [T(21) = 2, p = 0.059, effect size(d) = 0.83; Fig. 4B–D]. Tobacco use in the DCC+/− participants did not differ from tobacco use in the UHVs (age of onset: T(18) = 1.27, p = 0.22; current use: T(7) = 0.98, p = 0.36; lifetime use: U= 48, p = 0.94), but this was not unexpected given that their stricter selection criteria included an absence of tobacco and other substance-use problems (see Human participants and data acquisition). Indeed, compared with DCC+/+ relatives, the UHVs also exhibited significantly reduced lifetime use (U = 15, p = 0.046) and increased age of onset (T(19) = 2.77, p = 0.012) of cigarette smoking. There were no statistically significant group effects for sensitivity to punishment, sensitivity to reward, alcohol use, or cannabis use.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Personality traits and cigarette use. A–D, Group differences in (A) novelty seeking, and three measures of cigarette smoking: (B) age of onset, (C) current weekly use, and (D) lifetime use. Because the UHV selection criteria were stricter, excluding on the basis of psychiatric disorders including tobacco and other substance-use disorders, they were excluded from the cigarette analyses. *p ≤ 0.05.

Human anatomical connectivity

Main effects of group were found for anatomical connectivity between the SN/VTA seed and its target regions, the VS (χ(2)2 = 13.46, p = 0.0012) and vmPFC (χ(2)2 = 8.72, p = 0.013; Fig. 5A,B). These effects reflected connectivity reductions in DCC+/− carriers compared with both control groups; i.e., compared with DCC+/+ [VS: U= 30, p = 0.0005, effect size(r) = 0.60; vmPFC: U = 40, p = 0.0031, effect size(r) = 0.53] and UHV [VS: U = 75, p = 0.0029, effect size(r) = 0.48; vmPFC: U = 101.5, p = 0.034, effect size(r) = 0.35]. Exploratory analyses identified a negative correlation between SN/VTA–hippocampus anatomical connectivity and lifetime cannabis (ρ = −0.44, p = 0.019; Fig. 5C), though this association was not predicted a priori.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

DTI. A, B, Group differences in anatomical connectivity with seed in SN/VTA and targets in (A) VS and (B) vmPFC. C, SN/VTA–hippocampus anatomical connectivity is negatively correlated with lifetime cannabis use. ρ = −0.44*. D, Mean FA in the hippocampus is reduced in DCC+/− carriers. Red circles are DCC+/− carriers, blue circles are DCC+/+ relatives, and green circles are UHVs. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001.

A main effect of group was detected for FA in the hippocampus (F(2,46) = 3.66, p = 0.034), such that FA was reduced among DCC+/− carriers compared with DCC+/+ relatives (T(46) = 2.70, p = 0.0096, effect size(d) = 1.02) but not compared with UHV (T(46) = 1.32, p = 0.19, effect size(d) = 0.46; Fig. 5D). To investigate whole-brain group differences in FA and MD, TBSS was performed among DCC+/− carriers, DCC+/+ relatives, and UHVs. No significant group alterations in FA or MD skeletons were detected. Similarly, no significant group differences were detected in mean FA (all p's ≥ 0.16) or mean diffusivity (all p's ≥ 0.26) within the SN/VTA, VS, vmPFC, or mPFC/ACC.

Human functional connectivity

The functional connectivity analyses did not yield statistically significant main effects of group for the SN/VTA with the a priori target sites. However, exploratory whole-brain analyses tentatively identified other group differences within the DCC+/− family (FDR corrected p < 0.05; cluster size, ≥540 mm3), including decreased functional connectivity from the SN/VTA seed to the left mPFC/ACC [T(27) = 5.02, pFDR = 0.014, effect size(d) = 1.93; peak: x = −18, y = 42, z = 9] and increased functional connectivity from the SN/VTA to the left hippocampus [T(27) = 4.74, pFDR = 0.047, effect size(d) = 1.82; peak: x = −24, y = −9, z = −15) in DCC+/− participants, compared with DCC+/+ relatives (Table 2).

Table 2.

Whole-brain functional connectivity differences between DCC+/− carriers and DCC+/+relatives, using the SN/VTA seed

Contrasts Hemisphere Brain region Cluster-size (mm3) T score P value FDR-corrected Cohen's D x y z
DCC+/− > DCC+/+ Left/right Inferior temporal gyrus 1188 5.55 0.014 2.14 45 −12 −39
Left/right Superior frontal gyrus/middle frontal gyrus 1755 5.10 0.014 1.96 18 63 30
Left Hippocampus 540 4.74 0.047 1.82 −24 −9 −15
DCC+/− < DCC+/+ Left mPFC/ACC 729 5.02 0.014 1.93 −18 42 9
Left/right Superior parietal lobule/inferior parietal lobule 972 4.75 0.047 1.83 21 −75 51
Right Precentral gyrus 567 4.69 0.047 1.81 3 −24 72

DCC+/− > DCC+/+, Increased connectivity among DCC+/− carriers compared to DCC+/+carriers. DCC+/− < DCC+/+, Decreased connectivity among DCC+/− carriers compared to DCC+/+ carriers. p values are FDR corrected. Cluster size, ≥540 mm3.

Human morphometry

Main effects of group were detected in the putamen (F(2,46) = 7.35, p = 0.0017), reflecting reduced volume in DCC+/− carriers compared with both control groups [DCC+/+: T(46) = 3.54, p = 0.0009, effect size(d) = 1.37; UHV: T(46) = 2.92, p = 0.0054, effect size(d) = 0.93; Fig. 6A]. No significant volumetric alterations between groups were detected in the NAcc, caudate nucleus, or hippocampus (Fig. 6B–D).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Human morphometry. Regional GM volume in DCC+/− carriers, DCC+/+ relatives, and UHVs. A–F, Targets identified in whole-brain voxel-based morphometry and regions of interest comprised the (A) putamen, (B) nucleus accumbens (NAcc), (C) caudate nucleus, (D) hippocampus, (E) vmPFC, and (F) mPFC/ACC. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001.

A significant main effect of group was also observed in the vmPFC (F(2,46) = 3.59, p = 0.036), with increased volume among DCC+/− carriers compared with UHVs [T(46) = 2.53, p = 0.015, effect size(d) = 0.94], but there were no differences between DCC+/− carriers and DCC+/+ relatives [T(46) = 0.36, p = 0.72, effect size(d) = 0.12; Fig. 6E]. In comparison, a significant main effect of group was detected in the mPFC/ACC (F(2,46) = 4.87, p = 0.012), a region detected in the functional connectivity whole-brain analysis, with the DCC+/− carriers exhibiting significantly increased volume, compared with both DCC+/+ relatives [T(46) = 2.43, p = 0.019, effect size(d) = 1.10] and UHVs [T(46) = 2.85, p = 0.0065, effect size(d) = 0.88; Fig. 6F].

Mouse morphometry

The two-way ANOVA of NAcc volumes yielded main effects of genotype and age without a genotype × age interaction (F(1,25) = 0.04, p = 0.85). Compared with wild-type mice, Dcc-haploinsufficient mice exhibited reduced NAcc volumes (F(1,25) = 12.66, p = 0.0015), and this was apparent both at adolescence [T(50) = 2.88, p = 0.0058, effect size(d) = 1.09] and at adulthood [T(50) = 3.09, p = 0.003, effect size(d) = 1.26]. The main effect of age reflected increased NAcc volumes in adulthood, relative to adolescence, for both genotypes (F(1,25) = 16.61, p = 0.0004; Fig. 7A). There was not a significant effect of genotype in the dorsal striatum (F(1,25) = 0.84, p = 0.37), but there was an effect of age (F(1,25) = 46.77, p < 0.0001), reflecting increased volume in adulthood, relative to adolescence (Fig. 7B).

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Mice morphometry. Regional brain volumes in Dcc-haploinsufficient and wild-type mice, measured in adolescence and again, in the same animals, in adulthood. A–F, Regions of interest comprised the (A) nucleus accumbens (NAcc), (B) dorsal striatum, (C) hippocampus, and three subregions of the mPFC: (D) cingulate-1, (E) prelimbic, and (F) infralimbic. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01.

As with the NAcc, a volumetric reduction in the hippocampus was detected among Dcc-haploinsufficient mice, relative to wild-type mice, as evidenced by a main effect of genotype (F(1,25) = 6.77, p = 0.015), with significant effects at adolescence [T(50) = 2.78, p = 0.0077, effect size(d) = 1.05] and adulthood [T(50) = 2.17, p = 0.035, effect size(d) = 0.88]. Hippocampal volumes also exhibited a main effect of age (F(1,25) = 21.55, p < 0.0001), whereby volumes were increased in adulthood, relative to adolescence, for both genotypes. The genotype × age interaction was not significant (F(1,25) = 0.97, p = 0.33; Fig. 7C).

There were no statistically significant effects of genotype in the cingulate-1, prelimbic, or infralimbic regions of the mPFC. However, main effects of age were identified in the cingulate-1 cortex where volumes were reduced in adulthood, relative to adolescence, for both genotypes (F(1,25) = 28.56, p < 0.0001). Similar trends for effects of age were detected in the prelimbic (F(1,25) = 3.69, p = 0.066) and infralimbic (F(1,25) = 3.55, p = 0.071) cortices (Fig. 7D–F).

Discussion

The study's primary findings are that humans who are haploinsufficient for the axon guidance molecule receptor gene DCC exhibited decreased mesocorticolimbic anatomical connectivity, decreased striatal volume, lower novelty-seeking personality-trait scores, and, more tentatively, less use of at least one addictive substance, cigarettes. Volumetric reductions seen in the striatum were paralleled by strikingly similar findings in Dcc-haploinsufficient mice.

Alterations in human mesocorticolimbic connectivity

To our knowledge, the present study provides the first evidence that DCC-haploinsufficient humans have decreased anatomical connectivity between the SN/VTA and forebrain projection sites. This finding is consistent with results from a recent DTI study of a single individual with homozygous DCC−/− mutations. That study identified broad disorganization and axon reduction, including a decrease in anterior–posterior fibers (Jamuar et al., 2017). Of greater relevance for the current study, the more extensive literature with DCC-deficient mice has identified direct evidence of mesocorticolimbic-specific connectivity disturbances. During adolescence, DCC receptors in mesolimbic dopamine neurons promote their targeting in the NAcc, preventing them from growing ectopically to the mPFC (Manitt et al., 2011, 2013; Reynolds et al., 2018). In conditional Dcc haploinsufficient mice, the mesolimbic dopamine neurons are rerouted to the cingulate 1 and prelimbic portions of the pregenual mPFC (Manitt et al., 2011; Reynolds et al., 2018), concomitantly reduced dopamine varicosities in the NAcc (Reynolds et al., 2018), and diminished amphetamine-induced NAcc dopamine release (Flores et al., 2005; Grant et al., 2007). The effects of Dcc haploinsufficiency on nondopamine corticolimbic–midbrain connectivity have not been explored in detail.

Functional connectivity changes between the SN/VTA and its targets in the mPFC/ACC and hippocampus were also identified when contrasting DCC+/− carriers and their DCC+/+ relatives. However, these same alterations were not observed between DCC+/− carriers and UHVs. This could reflect the fact that the DCC+/+ relatives constituted a better-matched control group with shared genetic and environmental features. Moreover, the selection criteria were stricter for UHVs, compared with both family groups, with volunteers excluded on the basis of psychiatric disorders, including substance-use disorders. This noted, since the functional connectivity alterations in the DCC+/− carriers differed from one of the two control groups only, these particular results should be interpreted with caution.

Volumetric alterations

Striatal volumetric reductions were seen in DCC-haploinsufficient humans and mice. These striatal effects occurred ventrally in mice and more dorsally in humans. The different locus of effect might plausibly be explained by anatomical and functional differences between the species. First, in rodents there is a clear dissociation between mesolimbic (VTA to VS) and nigrostriatal (SN to dorsal striatum) pathways (Düzel et al., 2009), whereas in humans, mesolimbic pathways originate from both the VTA and SN (Düzel et al., 2009). Second, the VS comprises the NAcc and olfactory tubercle in rodents, whereas in primates it also includes ventral aspects of the putamen and caudate nucleus (Haber et al., 1990; Holt et al., 1997). Finally, the dorsal striatum, comprising the unified caudate–putamen in rodents, exists as two structures in humans (caudate nucleus and putamen) separated by the internal capsule, a bundle of fibers richly expressing DCC (Shu et al., 2000).

The NAcc volumetric reductions identified in adolescent and adult Dcc+/− mice are interesting in light of the previously reported NAcc findings, including reduced dopamine fiber innervation, blunted amphetamine-induced dopamine release, and disrupted amphetamine-induced behaviors (Hoops and Flores, 2017). Since the striatal volumetric reductions are present in adolescence, they precede the dopamine pathway alterations observed in adult, and not adolescent, Dcc+/− mice (Hoops and Flores, 2017). Since the precise etiology of these volumetric effects is unknown, they may be driven by DCC-induced alterations to either dopaminergic or nondopaminergic neurons. Moreover, developmental changes between adolescence and adulthood were identified: striatal and hippocampal volumes increased while mPFC volumes decreased, and these effects were independent of genotype.

The human putamen effect might not be restricted to rare DCC mutations. Indeed, a recent large genome-wide association study in the general population (n = 30,717) found that putamen volume was influenced by four genes, including a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in an intronic locus of DCC (Hibar et al., 2015). To our knowledge, the consequence of this SNP on the expression or function of the DCC protein is unknown. In comparison, in the present a priori hypothesis-guided study, knowing that the mutated allele results in nonfunctional DCC protein (Srour et al., 2010), we have strengthened the evidence for and identified the direction of this DCC-associated effect on human putamen.

Personality traits, substance use, and associations with mesocorticolimbic connectivity

The low novelty-seeking trait scores and low tobacco-use findings among DCC+/− humans are remarkably consistent with the phenotype of adult Dcc+/− mice, which exhibit blunted stimulant drug-induced behavioral responses and reduced intracranial self-stimulation reward (Grant et al., 2007; Yetnikoff et al., 2007; Flores, 2011; Kim et al., 2013; Reynolds et al., 2016). Novelty-seeking scores in the DCC+/− mutation carriers were reduced compared with both control groups, whereas cigarette use was reduced compared with DCC+/+ relatives only. Although the lack of differences in cigarette use between DCC+/− and UHV groups diminishes the robustness of the finding, the result is not unanticipated given that problematic tobacco and other substance use were exclusion criteria for UHVs. Finally, lifetime cannabis use was negatively correlated with anatomical connectivity between the SN/VTA and hippocampus. This finding was not hypothesized a priori, though it might have some bearing with respect to previously reported evidence of anatomical connectivity reductions in hippocampal pathways among long-term cannabis users (Zalesky et al., 2012).

Limitations

The present study should be considered in light of the following. First, there are general limitations of diffusion MRI tractography to infer fiber pathways, including indirect measurement of axonal orientations and the challenge of resolving crossing fibers (Jones et al., 2013; Jbabdi et al., 2015). However, the tractography maps from the SN/VTA accord closely with tract-tracing studies in macaques (Haber, 2014) with main projections to the striatum, prefrontal, and limbic areas. Second, functional and diffusion MRI cannot discern the direction or neurochemistry of axonal projections, but postmortem DCC mapping studies (Harter et al., 2010; Manitt et al., 2013; Reyes et al., 2013) and the growing animal literature (Osborne et al., 2005; Manitt et al., 2010; Flores, 2011; Hoops and Flores, 2017) suggest that dopamine neurons and their postsynaptic targets are likely prominent contributors. Third, our sample size is modest (20 DCC mutation carriers and 36 controls). This noted, the a priori hypotheses were guided by an in-depth animal literature (Flores, 2011; Hoops and Flores, 2017), the haploinsufficient DCC mutation is known to produce nonfunctional DCC protein (Srour et al., 2010), and the sample size is the largest DTI study of DCC mutation carriers reported to date. Previous studies evaluated corticospinal pathways in seven carriers in one study (Marsh et al., 2017) and two carriers in another (Welniarz et al., 2017). A third study evaluated whole-brain connectivity in just one carrier (Jamuar et al., 2017). Thus, though caution is warranted as with any novel observation, we propose that the clear a priori hypotheses, the carefully matched samples, and the general robustness of the core findings provide some confidence.

Conclusions

We have identified in humans for the first time the effects of a mutated axon guidance receptor gene on mesocorticolimbic connectivity, terminal region volumes, and mesocorticolimbic-related behaviors. Strikingly, the striatal volume reductions were seen in both DCC-haploinsufficient humans and mice. Together these effects of DCC haploinsufficiency might have implications for understanding recently reported associations between genetic variations in this axon guidance receptor and neuropsychiatric disorders (Grant et al., 2012; Manitt et al., 2013; Dunn et al., 2016; Okbay et al., 2016; Yan et al., 2016; Torres-Berrío et al., 2017; Ward et al., 2017; Zeng et al., 2017; Leday et al., 2018).

Footnotes

This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (to M.L.; MOP-119543) and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (to C.F.; RO1DA037911). We thank Jared Rowley and Dr. Pedro Rosa-Neto for their technical assistance.

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References

  1. Andersson JL, Jenkinson M, Smith S (2007) Non-linear registration, aka Spatial normalization. FMRIB technical report TR07JA2. FMRIB Analysis Group of the University of Oxford 2. Oxford, UK: FMRIB Centre. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartra O, McGuire JT, Kable JW (2013) The valuation system: a coordinate-based meta-analysis of BOLD fMRI experiments examining neural correlates of subjective value. Neuroimage 76:412–427. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Behrens TE, Berg HJ, Jbabdi S, Rushworth MF, Woolrich MW (2007) Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: what can we gain? Neuroimage 34:144–155. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Biswal BB, Mennes M, Zuo XN, Gohel S, Kelly C, Smith SM, Beckmann CF, Adelstein JS, Buckner RL, Colcombe S, Dogonowski AM, Ernst M, Fair D, Hampson M, Hoptman MJ, Hyde JS, Kiviniemi VJ, Kötter R, Li SJ, Lin CP, et al. (2010) Toward discovery science of human brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:4734–4739. 10.1073/pnas.0911855107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Caseras X, Avila C, Torrubia R (2003) The measurement of individual differences in behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation systems: a comparison of personality scales. Pers Ind Diff 34:999–1013. 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00084-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. De Fruyt F, Van De Wiele L, Van Heeringen C (2000) Cloninger's psychobiological model of temperament and character and the five-factor model of personality. Pers Ind Diff 29:441–452. 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00204-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Desikan RS, Ségonne F, Fischl B, Quinn BT, Dickerson BC, Blacker D, Buckner RL, Dale AM, Maguire RP, Hyman BT, Albert MS, Killiany RJ (2006) An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 31:968–980. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dunn EC, Wiste A, Radmanesh F, Almli LM, Gogarten SM, Sofer T, Faul JD, Kardia SL, Smith JA, Weir DR, Zhao W, Soare TW, Mirza SS, Hek K, Tiemeier H, Goveas JS, Sarto GE, Snively BM, Cornelis M, Koenen KC, et al. (2016) Genome-wide association study (GWAS) and genome-wide by environment interaction study (GWEIS) of depressive symptoms in African American and Hispanic/Latina women. Depress Anxiety 33:265–280. 10.1002/da.22484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Düzel E, Bunzeck N, Guitart-Masip M, Wittmann B, Schott BH, Tobler PN (2009) Functional imaging of the human dopaminergic midbrain. Trends Neurosci 32:321–328. 10.1016/j.tins.2009.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fazeli A, Dickinson SL, Hermiston ML, Tighe RV, Steen RG, Small CG, Stoeckli ET, Keino-Masu K, Masu M, Rayburn H, Simons J, Bronson RT, Gordon JI, Tessier-Lavigne M, Weinberg RA (1997) Phenotype of mice lacking functional deleted in colorectal cancer (Dcc) gene. Nature 386:796–804. 10.1038/386796a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Flores C. (2011) Role of netrin-1 in the organization and function of the mesocorticolimbic dopamine system. J Psychiatry Neurosci 36:296–310. 10.1503/jpn.100171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Flores C, Manitt C, Rodaros D, Thompson KM, Rajabi H, Luk KC, Tritsch NX, Sadikot AF, Stewart J, Kennedy TE (2005) Netrin receptor deficient mice exhibit functional reorganization of dopaminergic systems and do not sensitize to amphetamine. Mol Psychiatry 10:606–612. 10.1038/sj.mp.4001607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Frank MJ, Seeberger LC, O'reilly RC (2004) By carrot or by stick: cognitive reinforcement learning in parkinsonism. Science 306:1940–1943. 10.1126/science.1102941 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fritz CO, Morris PE, Richler JJ (2012) Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. J Exp Psychol Gen 141:2–18. 10.1037/a0024338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gad JM, Keeling SL, Wilks AF, Tan SS, Cooper HM (1997) The expression patterns of guidance receptors, DCC and Neogenin, are spatially and temporally distinct throughout mouse embryogenesis. Dev Biol 192:258–273. 10.1006/dbio.1997.8756 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Grant A, Hoops D, Labelle-Dumais C, Prévost M, Rajabi H, Kolb B, Stewart J, Arvanitogiannis A, Flores C (2007) Netrin-1 receptor-deficient mice show enhanced mesocortical dopamine transmission and blunted behavioural responses to amphetamine. Eur J Neurosci 26:3215–3228. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05888.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Grant A, Fathalli F, Rouleau G, Joober R, Flores C (2012) Association between schizophrenia and genetic variation in DCC: a case–control study. Schizophr Res 137:26–31. 10.1016/j.schres.2012.02.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Haber SN. (2014) The place of dopamine in the cortico-basal ganglia circuit. Neuroscience 282:248–257. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.10.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Haber SN, Lynd E, Klein C, Groenewegen HJ (1990) Topographic organization of the ventral striatal efferent projections in the rhesus monkey: an anterograde tracing study. J Comp Neurol 293:282–298. 10.1002/cne.902930210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Harter PN, Bunz B, Dietz K, Hoffmann K, Meyermann R, Mittelbronn M (2010) Spatio-temporal deleted in colorectal cancer (DCC) and netrin-1 expression in human foetal brain development. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 36:623–635. 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2010.01100.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hibar DP, Stein JL, Renteria ME, Arias-Vasquez A, Desrivières S, Jahanshad N, Toro R, Wittfeld K, Abramovic L, Andersson M, Aribisala BS, Armstrong NJ, Bernard M, Bohlken MM, Boks MP, Bralten J, Brown AA, Chakravarty MM, Chen Q, Ching CR, et al. (2015) Common genetic variants influence human subcortical brain structures. Nature 520:224–229. 10.1038/nature14101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Holt DJ, Graybiel AM, Saper CB (1997) Neurochemical architecture of the human striatum. J Comp Neurol 384:1–25. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19970721)384:1%3C1::AID-CNE1%3E3.0.CO;-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hoops D, Flores C (2017) Making dopamine connections in adolescence. Trends Neurosci 40:709–719. 10.1016/j.tins.2017.09.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jamuar SS, Schmitz-Abe K, D'Gama AM, Drottar M, Chan WM, Peeva M, Servattalab S, Lam AN, Delgado MR, Clegg NJ, Zayed ZA, Dogar MA, Alorainy IA, Jamea AA, Abu-Amero K, Griebel M, Ward W, Lein ES, Markianos K, Barkovich AJ, et al. (2017) Biallelic mutations in human DCC cause developmental split-brain syndrome. Nat Genet 49:606–612. 10.1038/ng.3804 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jbabdi S, Sotiropoulos SN, Haber SN, Van Essen DC, Behrens TE (2015) Measuring macroscopic brain connections in vivo. Nat Neurosci 18:1546–1555. 10.1038/nn.4134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jenkinson M, Smith S (2001) A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med Image Anal 5:143–156. 10.1016/S1361-8415(01)00036-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jones DK, Knösche TR, Turner R (2013) White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: the do's and don'ts of diffusion MRI. Neuroimage 73:239–254. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.081 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Keuken MC, Forstmann BU (2015) A probabilistic atlas of the basal ganglia using 7 T MRI. Data Brief 4:577–582. 10.1016/j.dib.2015.07.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim JH, Lavan D, Chen N, Flores C, Cooper H, Lawrence AJ (2013) Netrin-1 receptor-deficient mice show age-specific impairment in drug-induced locomotor hyperactivity but still self-administer methamphetamine. Psychopharmacology 230:607–616. 10.1007/s00213-013-3187-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Leday GGR, Vértes PE, Richardson S, Greene JR, Regan T, Khan S, Henderson R, Freeman TC, Pariante CM, Harrison NA, Perry VH, Drevets WC, Wittenberg GM, Bullmore ET (2018) Replicable and coupled changes in innate and adaptive immune gene expression in two case-control studies of blood microarrays in major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatry 83:70–80. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.01.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Leyton M, Boileau I, Benkelfat C, Diksic M, Baker G, Dagher A (2002) Amphetamine-induced increases in extracellular dopamine, drug wanting, and novelty seeking: a PET/[11C] raclopride study in healthy men. Neuropsychopharmacology 27:1027–1035. 10.1016/S0893-133X(02)00366-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Livesey FJ, Hunt SP (1997) Netrin and netrin receptor expression in the embryonic mammalian nervous system suggests roles in retinal, striatal, nigral, and cerebellar development. Mol Cell Neurosci 8:417–429. 10.1006/mcne.1997.0598 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Manitt C, Labelle-Dumais C, Eng C, Grant A, Mimee A, Stroh T, Flores C (2010) Peri-pubertal emergence of UNC-5 homologue expression by dopamine neurons in rodents. PLoS One 5:e11463. 10.1371/journal.pone.0011463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Manitt C, Mimee A, Eng C, Pokinko M, Stroh T, Cooper HM, Kolb B, Flores C (2011) The netrin receptor DCC is required in the pubertal organization of mesocortical dopamine circuitry. J Neurosci 31:8381–8394. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0606-11.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Manitt C, Eng C, Pokinko M, Ryan RT, Torres-Berrío A, Lopez JP, Yogendran SV, Daubaras MJ, Grant A, Schmidt ER, Tronche F, Krimpenfort P, Cooper HM, Pasterkamp RJ, Kolb B, Turecki G, Wong TP, Nestler EJ, Giros B, Flores C (2013) DCC orchestrates the development of the prefrontal cortex during adolescence and is altered in psychiatric patients. Transl Psychiatry 3:e338. 10.1038/tp.2013.105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Marsh AP, Heron D, Edwards TJ, Quartier A, Galea C, Nava C, Rastetter A, Moutard ML, Anderson V, Bitoun P, Bunt J, Faudet A, Garel C, Gillies G, Gobius I, Guegan J, Heide S, Keren B, Lesne F, Lukic V, et al. (2017) Mutations in DCC cause isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum with incomplete penetrance. Nat Genet 49:511–514. 10.1038/ng.3794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Okbay A, Baselmans BM, De Neve JE, Turley P, Nivard MG, Fontana MA, Meddens SF, Linnér RK, Rietveld CA, Derringer J, Gratten J, Lee JJ, Liu JZ, de Vlaming R, Ahluwalia TS, Buchwald J, Cavadino A, Frazier-Wood AC, Furlotte NA, Garfield V (2016) Genetic variants associated with subjective well-being, depressive symptoms, and neuroticism identified through genome-wide analyses. Nat Genet 48:624–633. 10.1038/ng.3552 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Osborne P, Halliday GM, Cooper HM, Keast JR (2005) Localization of immunoreactivity for deleted in colorectal cancer (DCC), the receptor for the guidance factor netrin-1, in ventral tier dopamine projection pathways in adult rodents. Neuroscience 131:671–681. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.11.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Paxinos G, Franklin KB (2004) The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Houston, Texas: Gulf Professional Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  40. Pokinko M, Moquin L, Torres-Berrío A, Gratton A, Flores C (2015) Resilience to amphetamine in mouse models of netrin-1 haploinsufficiency: role of mesocortical dopamine. Psychopharmacology 232:3719–3729. 10.1007/s00213-015-4032-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Reyes S, Fu Y, Double KL, Cottam V, Thompson LH, Kirik D, Paxinos G, Watson C, Cooper HM, Halliday GM (2013) Trophic factors differentiate dopamine neurons vulnerable to Parkinson's disease. Neurobiol Aging 34:873–886. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.07.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Reynolds LM, Gifuni AJ, McCrea ET, Shizgal P, Flores C (2016) dcc haploinsufficiency results in blunted sensitivity to cocaine enhancement of reward seeking. Behav Brain Res 298:27–31. 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.05.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Reynolds LM, Pokinko M, Torres-Berrío A, Cuesta S, Lambert LC, Del Cid Pellitero E, Wodzinski M, Manitt C, Krimpenfort P, Kolb B, Flores C (2018) DCC receptors drive prefrontal cortex maturation by determining dopamine axon targeting in adolescence. Biol Psychiatry 83:181–192. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.06.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Rousseeuw PJ, Hubert M (2011) Robust statistics for outlier detection. WIREs Data Mining Knowl Discov 1:73–79. 10.1002/widm.2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Shu T, Valentino KM, Seaman C, Cooper HM, Richards LJ (2000) Expression of the netrin-1 receptor, deleted in colorectal cancer (DCC), is largely confined to projecting neurons in the developing forebrain. J Comp Neurol 416:201–212. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(20000110)416:2%3C201::AID-CNE6%3E3.0.CO;-Z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Smith SM, Nichols TE (2009) Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage 44:83–98. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, Rueckert D, Nichols TE, Mackay CE, Watkins KE, Ciccarelli O, Cader MZ, Matthews PM, Behrens TE (2006) Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage 31:1487–1505. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Srour M, Philibert M, Dion MH, Duquette A, Richer F, Rouleau GA, Chouinard S (2009) Familial congenital mirror movements: report of a large 4-generation family. Neurology 73:729–731. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b59bda [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Srour M, Rivière JB, Pham JM, Dubé MP, Girard S, Morin S, Dion PA, Asselin G, Rochefort D, Hince P, Diab S, Sharafaddinzadeh N, Chouinard S, Théoret H, Charron F, Rouleau GA (2010) Mutations in DCC cause congenital mirror movements. Science 328:592. 10.1126/science.1186463 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Torres-Berrío A, Lopez JP, Bagot RC, Nouel D, Dal Bo G, Cuesta S, Zhu L, Manitt C, Eng C, Cooper HM, Storch KF, Turecki G, Nestler EJ, Flores C (2017) DCC confers susceptibility to depression-like behaviors in humans and mice and is regulated by miR-218. Biol Psychiatry 81:306–315. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.08.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Ward J, Strawbridge RJ, Bailey MES, Graham N, Ferguson A, Lyall DM, Cullen B, Pidgeon LM, Cavanagh J, Mackay DF, Pell JP, O'Donovan M, Escott-Price V, Smith DJ (2017) Genome-wide analysis in UK biobank identifies four loci associated with mood instability and genetic correlation with major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder and schizophrenia. Trans Psychiatry 7:1264. 10.1038/s41398-017-0012-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Welniarz Q, Morel MP, Pourchet O, Gallea C, Lamy JC, Cincotta M, Doulazmi M, Belle M, Méneret A, Trouillard O, Ruiz M, Brochard V, Meunier S, Trembleau A, Vidailhet M, Chédotal A, Dusart I, Roze E (2017) Non cell-autonomous role of DCC in the guidance of the corticospinal tract at the midline. Sci Rep 7:410. 10.1038/s41598-017-00514-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Yan P, Qiao X, Wu H, Yin F, Zhang J, Ji Y, Wei S, Lai J (2016) An association study between genetic polymorphisms in functional regions of five genes and the risk of schizophrenia. J Mol Neurosci 59:366–375. 10.1007/s12031-016-0751-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Yetnikoff L, Labelle-Dumais C, Flores C (2007) Regulation of netrin-1 receptors by amphetamine in the adult brain. Neuroscience 150:764–773. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.09.069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Zalesky A, Solowij N, Yücel M, Lubman DI, Takagi M, Harding IH, Lorenzetti V, Wang R, Searle K, Pantelis C, Seal M (2012) Effect of long-term cannabis use on axonal fibre connectivity. Brain 135:2245–2255. 10.1093/brain/aws136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Zeng Y, Navarro P, Fernandez-Pujals AM, Hall LS, Clarke TK, Thomson PA, Smith BH, Hocking LJ, Padmanabhan S, Hayward C, MacIntyre DJ, Wray NR, Wray NR, Deary IJ, Porteous DJ, Haley CS, McIntosh AM (2017) A combined pathway and regional heritability analysis indicates NETRIN1 pathway is associated with major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatry 81:336–346. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.04.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Society for Neuroscience

RESOURCES