Abstract
MicroRNA (miRNA/miR) dysfunction is a hallmark of lung cancer, and results in the dysregulation of tumor suppressors and oncogenes during lung cancer progression. Selection of the 5p and 3p arms of miRNA is a mechanism that improves the modulation of miRNA biological functions and complicates the regulatory network in human types of cancer. However, the involvement of arm selection preference of miRNA in lung cancer remains unclear. In the present study, changes in miRNA arm selection preference were comprehensively identified in lung cancer and corresponding adjacent normal tissues by analyzing The Cancer Genome Atlas. Arm selection was revealed to be consistent in the majority of miRNAs in lung cancer. Only a few miRNAs had significantly altered arm selection preference in lung cancer. Among these, the biological functions of the individual arms of miR-324 were investigated further. The data revealed that miR-324-5p and −3p were significantly overexpressed in lung cancer cells. Ectopic expression of miR-324-5p significantly promoted cell proliferation and invasion in lung cancer cells, while miR-324-3p overexpression significantly increased cell proliferation but did not alter the invasion of lung cancer cells. In conclusion, the arm selection preference of miRNA may be an additional mechanism through which biological functions are modulated. The results of the present study provide a novel insight into the underlying mechanisms of lung cancer and may direct research into future therapies.
Keywords: microRNA, microRNA-324, next-generation sequencing, arm selection preference, the cancer genome atlas, lung cancer
Introduction
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-associated mortality globally (1). Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer, accounting for ~85% of all lung cancers, and >40% of NSCLC cases are metastatic (stage IV) at the point of diagnosis (2,3). Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) are the major pathological subtypes of NSCLC. NSCLC treatment has improved in the past decade, with more effective screening, diagnosis, and systemic treatments contributing to increased survival rates (3). Lung cancer cells frequently participate in cancer-associated pathways, including growth signaling, programmed cell death, angiogenesis, cell invasion, and metastasis (4). Transformation from a normal cell to a malignant lung cancer cell phenotype is considered to occur in a multistep manner through a series of genetic and epigenetic alterations; ultimately evolving into invasive cancer by clonal expansion (5). Dysfunctional noncoding RNAs, including microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs), have been reported to be critical in carcinogenesis (6). MiRNAs are small, non-protein-coding RNAs, 19–24 nucleotides in length, which negatively modulate gene expression by suppressing mRNA translation or accelerating mRNA degradation (7–9). A single miRNA may regulate >100 target genes by targeting their 3′-untranslated regions. Therefore, miRNAs typically only fine-tune mRNA expression, suggesting that co-expressed miRNAs may function simultaneously to co-modulate a signaling pathway to achieve a biological function (10). Numerous dysregulated miRNAs have been reported in lung cancer cells, including let-7 and miR-17, −20a, −29, −107, −126, −138, and −185 (11–17). Dysfunctional expression of these miRNAs serves a critical function in the co-modulation of cell cycle progression, angiogenesis, apoptosis, adhesion and motility of lung cancer cells. In addition to miRNA-mRNA interaction networks, miR-#-5p and −3p arm selection preference is a complex mechanism that regulates the biological functions of miRNAs. Although the 5p and 3p arms of miRNA are generated from an identical pre-miRNA structure during the maturation process, the expression of certain miRNAs is altered in different tissues, developmental stages and species, as well as during cancer progression (18–27). However, the underlying mechanisms and functions of miRNA arm selection preference in lung cancer cells remain unclear. In the present study, multiple miRNA candidates with significantly altered arm selection preference in lung cancer were identified. Among these, miR-324 was selected for further examination in the present study. Our previous study revealed that miR-324-5p and −3p serve tumor suppressive functions in breast cancer and colon cancer (28). However, the function of miR-324-5p and −3p remains unclear in lung cancer. The present study is the first to report that miR-324-5p and −3p serve oncogenic functions in lung cancer cells. The results suggested that miR-324 may be a novel potential therapeutic target. These results may provide novel insights into lung cancer therapy and direct future research.
Materials and methods
Identification of miRNA arm selection preference using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)
A total of 891 small RNA expression profiles of LUAD (46 normal and 458 tumor tissues) and LUSC (45 normal and 342 tumor tissues) were downloaded from TCGA (https://tcga-data.nci.nih.gov/tcga/dataAccessMatrix.htm). A total of 253 miRNAs were selected for further examination of their arm selection preference, with the simultaneous expression of the 5p and 3p arms (expression of miR-#-5p or miR-#-3p >1 transcripts per million) in LUAD and LUSC. The 5p:3p arm expression ratio was assessed in LUAD, LUSC, and adjacent normal tissues. A fold change of >1.5 or <0.75 and P<0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference in the arm selection preference.
Cell lines
A human lung cancer cell line, A549, was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). The cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Biological Industries, Cromwell, CT, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone; GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Logan, UT, USA) and penicillin-streptomycin (penicillin, 100 U/ml and streptomycin, 100 µg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at 37°C.
Ectopic expression of miR-324-5p and −3p following transfection with mimics
The A549 cells were seeded in a 25T flask at a density of 1×106 cells/ml and were transfected with 10 nM miRNA-324-5p mimics; sense, 5′-CGCAUCCCCUAGGGCAUUGGUGU-3′ and antisense, 5′-ACCAAUGCCCUAGGGGAUGCGUU-3′, miR-324-3p mimics; sense, 5′-ACUGCCCCAGGUGCUGCUGG-3′ and antisense, 5′-AGCAGCACCUGGGGCAGUUU-3′ or a scramble control; sense, 5′-GCGACGAUCUGCCUAAGAUdTdT-3′ and antisense, 5′-AUCUUAGGCAGAUCGUCGCdTdT-3′ (GenDiscovery Biotechnology, Inc., New Taipei, Taiwan), using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX reagent, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). After 24 h of transfection, total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), following the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, tissue samples were homogenized in 1 ml TRIzol reagent and mixed with 0.2 ml chloroform for protein extraction, and RNA was precipitated by adding 0.5 ml isopropanol. The concentration, purity, and total RNA content were determined using a NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Technologies; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The transfection efficiency was examined through stem-loop reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis.
Stem-loop RT-qPCR
Total RNA (1 µg) was reverse-transcribed in a stem-loop RT reaction using RT primers and SuperScript III reverse transcriptase, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The RT reaction, included 1 µg RNA, 1X RT buffer (200 mM Tris-HCl, 500 mM KCl; pH 8.4), 2.5 mM dNTP (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 0.5 mM stem-loop miR-324-5p or −3p-RT primer (Gemomics BioSci and Tech, New Taipei, Taiwan). The reaction was performed under the following incubation conditions: 30 min at 16°C, followed by 50 cycles of 20°C for 30 sec, 42°C for 30 sec and 50°C for 1 sec. The enzyme was subsequently inactivated by incubation at 85°C for 5 min. qPCR was performed using an miRNA-specific forward primer and universal reverse primer, and the reaction mixture was incubated at 94°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 32 sec. Gene expression was detected using a SYBR Green I assay (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and miRNA expression was normalized to that of U6. The primer sequences used to examine miRNAs were as follows: miR-324-5p-RT primer: 5′-CTCAACTGGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTCAGTTGAGACACCAAT-3′; miR-324-5p gene-specific forward (GSF), 5′-CGGCGGCGCATCCCCTAGGGCAT-3′; miR-324-3p-RT, 5′-CTCAACTGGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTCAGTTGAGCCAGCAGC-3′; miR-324-3p-GSF, 5′-CGGCGGACTGCCCCAGGTGC-3′; universal reverse, 5′-CTGGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTC-3′; U6 forward, 5′-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3′ and reverse, 5′-AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3′.
Cell proliferation and colony formation assay
For the clonogenic assay, a gradient number of A549 cells, 1,000, 2,000 and 4,000, were seeded in 6-well plates and transfected with 10 nM miR-324-5p mimics, miR-324-3p mimics or a scramble control as aforementioned. The cells were incubated in a CO2 incubator at 37°C for 2 weeks until colony formation. The cells were then fixed with 4% formaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) for 10 min at room temperature and stained with crystal violet solution (0.05% crystal violet, 1% formaldehyde and 1% methanol; all from Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) for 20 min at room temperature. Then, the images of a representative colony formation were examined using a light microscope (magnification, ×100) (CKX41; Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Finally, 1 ml of 10% acetic acid (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) was added to each well to dissolve the crystal violet. The absorbance of individual wells was determined at 595 nm by using Multiskan FC (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). For the cell proliferation assay, 1×103 A549 cells transfected with 10 nM miR-324-5p mimics, miR-324-3p mimics, or a scramble control were seeded in a 96-well plate. Proliferation was determined at 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 days using the CellTiter-Glo One Solution assay, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA). All experiments were independently repeated 3 times.
Cell invasion assays
A549 cell invasion was analyzed using Transwell assays. Briefly, 4.5×105 cells were suspended in a serum-deprived DMEM (Biological Industries), supplemented with penicillin-streptomycin (penicillin, 100 U/ml and streptomycin, 100 µg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) and seeded on the upper chamber of the Transwell plates (Falcon; Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA) with a Matrigel coating, and DMEM (Biological Industries), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone; GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Logan, UT, USA) and penicillin-streptomycin (penicillin, 100 U/ml and streptomycin, 100 µg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) was added to the lower chambers for the invasion assay. The chambers were incubated in a CO2 incubator at 37°C for 12 or 24 h. The remaining cells in the upper chamber were then removed using cotton swabs, and the cells under the surface of the Transwell plates were fixed in 10% formaldehyde solution for 10 min at room temperature. The cells were stained with crystal violet solution (0.05% crystal violet, 1% Formaldehyde and 1% methanol) (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) for 20 min at room temperature, and the number of lung cancer cells in 3 fields of view was counted through phase-contrast microscopy. All experiments were repeated 3 times.
Identification of putative target genes of miR-324 with bioinformatics
A total of 82 putative target genes of miR-324-5p were identified using the TargetScan tool (release no. 7.0) (29). The expression levels of these putative target genes in LUAD and LUSC were obtained from TCGA. The correlations between putative target gene and miR-324-5p expression in LUAD or LUSC were examined using Spearman's correlation analysis.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were carried out using the SPSS 22.0 statistical software package (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Changes in the arm selection preference of miRNAs in lung cancer cells from TCGA were analyzed using unpaired Student's t-tests. Correlations between the miR-324-5p:-3p ratio in LUAD, LUSC and normal tissues were determined using Pearson's correlation coefficient analysis, with R2 as indicated. Spearman's correlation analysis was applied to examine the correlations between miR-324-5p and its target gene expression in lung cancer. Data concerning miR-324-5p and −3p expression in paired LUAD or LUSC tissues were analyzed using paired Student's t-tests. Cell proliferation and invasion were assessed in triplicate, and histograms represent the mean ± standard deviation. The data of cell growth and invasion were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Identification of changes in candidate miRNA arm selection preference in lung cancer using TCGA
Our group has previously demonstrated that the arm selection preference of certain miRNAs is altered significantly in breast cancer tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues (27). However, the arm selection preference of miRNAs in lung cancer remains to be clarified. To identify candidate miRNAs with an altered arm preference in lung cancer, small RNA profiles of 458 LUAD and 46 adjacent normal tissues, and 342 LUSC and 45 adjacent normal tissues, were downloaded from TCGA. As presented in Fig. 1A, 932 pre-miRNAs were detected in lung cancer (transcripts/million >1). Among these, 253 pre-miRNAs simultaneously produced miR-#-5p and miR-#-3p. The 5p:3p ratio was further analyzed in identical pre-miRNAs, and the 5p:3p ratio of the majority of miRNAs was revealed to be consistent between lung cancer and adjacent normal tissues (LUAD: R2=0.9304 and LUSC: R2=0.9188; Fig. 1B). Only a few miRNAs had significantly altered arm preference in LUAD or LUSC compared with adjacent normal tissues (fold change >1.5 or <0.75; P<0.05). In LUAD, the 5p:3p ratio of 73 miRNAs was significantly increased, and the 5p:3p ratio of 56 miRNAs was significantly decreased. In LUSC, the 5p:3p ratio of 71 miRNAs was significantly increased, and the 5p:3p ratio of 46 miRNAs was significantly decreased. Alterations in the arm selection preference of common miRNA candidates were further identified using a Venn diagram tool (version 2.1) (30). The results revealed that the arm selection preference of 36 miRNAs was upregulated and that of 19 miRNAs was downregulated in lung cancer (Fig. 1C; Table I).
Table I.
A, Upregulated miRNAs | ||
---|---|---|
5p/3p ratio fold change (tumor/normal) | ||
miRNAs | Lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) | Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) |
hsa-mir-9-1 | 9.2 | 10.9 |
hsa-mir-9-2 | 7.0 | 14.6 |
hsa-mir-17 | 2.7 | 1.9 |
hsa-mir-27b | 1.8 | 1.6 |
hsa-mir-29a | 2.5 | 4.5 |
hsa-mir-30c-1 | 2.5 | 4.7 |
hsa-mir-30c-2 | 6.3 | 8.7 |
hsa-mir-30e | 1.9 | 2.1 |
hsa-mir-33a | 3.0 | 9.0 |
hsa-mir-33b | 2.0 | 14.4 |
hsa-mir-96 | 19.8 | 69.5 |
hsa-mir-101-1 | 1.6 | 2.2 |
hsa-mir-125b-2 | 2.0 | 4.4 |
hsa-mir-127 | 2.2 | 4.5 |
hsa-mir-130a | 1.9 | 1.9 |
hsa-mir-136 | 3.3 | 2.2 |
hsa-mir-140 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
hsa-mir-143 | 3.7 | 3.2 |
hsa-mir-149 | 3.2 | 3.5 |
hsa-mir-182 | 11.2 | 38.8 |
hsa-mir-205 | 8.7 | 11.3 |
hsa-mir-218-1 | 1.8 | 2.1 |
hsa-mir-224 | 4.3 | 2.4 |
hsa-mir-324 | 1.5 | 2.2 |
hsa-mir-337 | 2.0 | 4.9 |
hsa-mir-362 | 2.0 | 2.9 |
hsa-mir-425 | 2.0 | 1.8 |
hsa-mir-502 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
hsa-mir-556 | 3.0 | 5.4 |
hsa-mir-616 | 1.7 | 5.2 |
hsa-mir-671 | 4.3 | 3.4 |
hsa-mir-877 | 5.0 | 3.0 |
hsa-mir-2277 | 1.9 | 11.1 |
hsa-mir-3065 | 2.2 | 1.7 |
hsa-mir-3607 | 1.8 | 23.6 |
hsa-mir-3679 | 6.7 | 8.6 |
B, Downregulated miRNAs | ||
5p/3p ratio fold change (tumor/normal) | ||
miRNAs | Lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) | Lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) |
hsa-let-7a-3 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
hsa-let-7g | 0.5 | 0.1 |
hsa-mir-20a | 0.5 | 0.7 |
hsa-mir-26a | 0.5 | 0.7 |
hsa-mir-27a | 0.3 | 0.4 |
hsa-mir-29b | 0.5 | 0.1 |
hsa-mir-138 | 0.3 | 0.5 |
hsa-mir-142 | 0.6 | 0.3 |
hsa-mir-335 | 0.7 | 0.5 |
hsa-mir-374b | 0.7 | 0.6 |
hsa-mir-423 | 0.6 | 0.3 |
hsa-mir-455 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
hsa-mir-497 | 0.3 | 0.7 |
hsa-mir-509 | 0.6 | 0.3 |
hsa-mir-532 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
hsa-mir-589 | 0.4 | 0.6 |
hsa-mir-629 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
hsa-mir-744 | 0.3 | 0.2 |
hsa-mir-769 | 0.6 | 0.4 |
miR, microRNA.
miR-324-5p and −3p serve distinctive functions in lung cancer
Our previous study revealed that miR-324-5p and miR-324-3p play distinct biological functions in breast cancer (28). However, the role of miR-324-5p and miR-324-3p was still unknown in lung cancer. Among the miRNA candidates with a switched arm preference, miR-324 was selected for further examination in the present study. According to the miRbase database, the pre-mir-324 gene is located in chr17:7223297-7223379, and an identical pre-mir-324 simultaneously produces miR-324-5p and −3p in humans (31–35). MiR-324-5p and −3p were significantly overexpressed in LUAD and LUSC compared with adjacent normal tissues (Fig. 2A and B). The expression of miR-324-5p was increased compared with miR-324-3p in lung cancer (Fig. 2C). As presented in Fig. 2C, the 5p:3p ratio in miR-324 was significantly increased (~2.2-fold) in LUAD compared with adjacent normal tissues. Furthermore, the 5p:3p ratio in miR-324 was significantly increased (~1.5-fold) in LUSC compared with adjacent normal tissues. Therefore, the 5p arm selection of miR-324 was more preferred in tumors compared with adjacent normal tissues. To investigate the biological functions of the individual arms of miR-324, miR-324-5p and miR-324-3p mimics were transfected into the A549 cells. Following transfection, the expression of miR-324-5p and −3p significantly increased in the transfected cells compared with the scramble controls (data not shown). Subsequently, cell proliferation and invasion were examined. As presented in Fig. 3A and B, ectopic miR-324-5p and −3p increased the proliferation of A549 cells. However, only miR-324-5p significantly increased cell invasion in lung cancer cells (Fig. 3C and D). These results revealed that miR-324-5p and −3p were generated from an identical pre-mir-324; however, the arm selection preference of miR-324 differed significantly between lung cancer and normal tissues. Different arms of miR-324 may serve distinct biological functions in the modulation of lung cancer cell invasion.
Identification of putative target genes of miR-324-5p in lung cancer
The data revealed that miR-324-5p significantly promoted lung cancer cell invasion. Therefore, putative target genes of miR-324-5p were identified using a bioinformatics approach. A total of 83 putative target genes of miR-324-5p were identified using TargetScan prediction tools. The expression levels of the target genes should be negatively correlated with miR-324-5p expression in lung cancer. Among these identified target genes, 11 gene expression levels were negatively correlated with miR-324-5p expression in LUAD and LUSC (Fig. 4A). As the expression levels of miR-324-5p were increased in lung cancer, those of the target genes should be decreased in lung cancer. The expression levels of the predicted candidates were further analyzed using TCGA, which revealed that glutathione peroxidase 3 (GPX3), regulator of calcineurin 1 (RCAN1) and mannosyl (β-1,4-) glycoprotein β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase (MGAT3) expression levels were significantly decreased (fold change <0.5) in LUAD and LUSC compared with adjacent normal tissues (Fig. 4B and C). Previous studies have reported that GPX3, RCAN1 and MGAT3 expression is significantly downregulated and serves a tumor-suppressive function in human cancer, including prostate cancer, lung cancer, ovarian cancer and lymphoma (36–39). According to the aforementioned data, miR-324-5p may promote lung cancer cell proliferation and invasion by suppressing GPX3, RCAN1 and MGAT3 expression in lung cancer. However, the underlying mechanisms require further clarification in the future.
Discussion
An identical pre-miRNA structure consists of two arms (5p and 3p) and is selected by the RNA-induced silencing complex to generate two mature miRNAs in the cell (8,9,40). Typically, the arm is selected on the basis of hydrogen bond theory. However, a number of previous studies have reported that the arm selection preference of certain miRNAs may vary in different types of cell or during carcinogenesis (20,21,27,41). In humans, significant changes have been reported in the arm selection preference of certain miRNAs between normal and tumor tissues, including gastric cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and breast cancer (20,21,27,41). Our group identified significant changes in the arm selection preference of 17 candidate miRNAs in breast cancer compared with adjacent normal tissues by comprehensively analyzing the Sequence Read Archive database (27). Among these, miR-324 arm selection was frequently altered in human cancer, including breast cancer, colon cancer, lung cancer and bladder cancer (28). The arm selection preference of miR-324 is a complex mechanism that modulates its biological function. Through TCGA analysis, miR-324-5p and miR-324-3p expression was frequently observed to be abnormal in human cancer (28). Microarray data have demonstrated that miR-324-5p expression is upregulated in lung cancer, melanoma, hepatocellular carcinoma and acute myeloid leukemia but downregulated in medulloblastoma (42–46). These results consistently indicate the significant upregulation of miR-324-5p in lung cancer.
miR-324-5p and miR-324-3p sequences differ considerably, suggesting that miR-324-5p and −3p serve distinct functions through targeting different protein-coding genes in different types of cancer. Tsai et al (27) reported that miR-324-5p and −3p suppressed cell proliferation and invasion in breast cancer, but only miR-324-5p inhibited cell proliferation and motility in colon cancer (28). An et al (39) reported that miR-324-5p suppressed the invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells by silencing ETS proto-oncogene 1, transcription factor and Sp1 transcription factor expression. The ectopic expression of miR-324-5p inhibited glioma cell proliferation by suppressing GLI family zinc finger 1 expression (47). Until now, previous studies have primarily focused on the function of miR-324-5p in human types of cancer, while the function of the passenger arm, miR-324-3p, remains unclear. Li et al (41) reported that miR-324-3p suppressed the growth of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells and promoted apoptosis by targeting Smad family member 7. Tsai et al (27) reported that miR-324-3p silenced the growth and motility of breast and colon cancer cells. In the present study, the results revealed that miR-324-5p and −3p promoted the proliferation of lung cancer cells, but only miR-324-5p accelerated the invasion of lung cancer cells. The present study is the first to report variation in the arm selection preference of miRNA-#-5p and miR-#-3p in lung cancer compared with healthy tissue. The results provide a novel insight into the arm selection preference of miRNAs, suggesting that this may be a mechanism that modulates their function and further complicates their regulatory network in human types of cancer.
Acknowledgements
The present study was supported by grants from Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital (grant nos. VGHKS-105-135, VGHKS-106-153 and VGHKS-106-006).
References
- 1.Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:9–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–2917. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Socinski MA, Crowell R, Hensing TE, Langer CJ, Lilenbaum R, Sandler AB, Morris D. American College of Chest Physicians: Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, stage IV: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition) Chest. 2007;132(Suppl 3):277S–289S. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000;100:57–70. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81683-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nowell PC. The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations. Science. 1976;194:23–28. doi: 10.1126/science.959840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wu HH, Lin WC, Tsai KW. Advances in molecular biomarkers for gastric cancer: miRNAs as emerging novel cancer markers. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2014;16:e1. doi: 10.1017/erm.2013.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yekta S, Shih IH, Bartel DP. MicroRNA-directed cleavage of HOXB8 mRNA. Science. 2004;304:594–596. doi: 10.1126/science.1097434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Trabucchi M, Briata P, Filipowicz W, Rosenfeld MG, Ramos A, Gherzi R. How to control miRNA maturation? RNA Biol. 2009;6:536–540. doi: 10.4161/rna.6.5.10080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Newman MA, Hammond SM. Emerging paradigms of regulated microRNA processing. Genes Dev. 2010;24:1086–1092. doi: 10.1101/gad.1919710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chen WS, Chen TW, Yang TH, Hu LY, Pan HW, Leung CM, Li SC, Ho MR, Shu CW, Liu PF, et al. Co-modulated behavior and effects of differentially expressed miRNA in colorectal cancer. BMC Genomics. 2013;14(Suppl 5):S12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-S5-S12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hayashita Y, Osada H, Tatematsu Y, Yamada H, Yanagisawa K, Tomida S, Yatabe Y, Kawahara K, Sekido Y, Takahashi T. A polycistronic microRNA cluster, miR-17-92, is overexpressed in human lung cancers and enhances cell proliferation. Cancer Res. 2005;65:9628–9632. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lee YS, Dutta A. The tumor suppressor microRNA let-7 represses the HMGA2 oncogene. Genes Dev. 2007;21:1025–1030. doi: 10.1101/gad.1540407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Matsubara H, Takeuchi T, Nishikawa E, Yanagisawa K, Hayashita Y, Ebi H, Yamada H, Suzuki M, Nagino M, Nimura Y, et al. Apoptosis induction by antisense oligonucleotides against miR-17-5p and miR-20a in lung cancers overexpressing miR-17-92. Oncogene. 2007;26:6099–6105. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fabbri M, Garzon R, Cimmino A, Liu Z, Zanesi N, Callegari E, Liu S, Alder H, Costinean S, Fernandez-Cymering C, et al. MicroRNA-29 family reverts aberrant methylation in lung cancer by targeting DNA methyltransferases 3A and 3B. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:15805–15810. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707628104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liu B, Peng XC, Zheng XL, Wang J, Qin YW. MiR-126 restoration down-regulate VEGF and inhibit the growth of lung cancer cell lines in vitro and in vivo. Lung Cancer. 2009;66:169–175. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2009.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Takahashi Y, Forrest AR, Maeno E, Hashimoto T, Daub CO, Yasuda J. miR-107 and MiR-185 can induce cell cycle arrest in human non small cell lung cancer cell lines. PLoS One. 2009;4:e6677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Xiao L, Zhou H, Li XP, Chen J, Fang C, Mao CX, Cui JJ, Zhang W, Zhou HH, Yin JY, Liu ZQ. MicroRNA-138 acts as a tumor suppressor in non small cell lung cancer via targeting YAP1. Oncotarget. 2016;7:40038–40046. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 18.Leung CM, Li SC, Chen TW, Ho MR, Hu LY, Liu WS, Wu TT, Hsu PC, Chang HT, Tsai KW. Comprehensive microRNA profiling of prostate cancer cells after ionizing radiation treatment. Oncol Rep. 2014;31:1067–1078. doi: 10.3892/or.2014.2988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cheng WC, Chung IF, Huang TS, Chang ST, Sun HJ, Tsai CF, Liang ML, Wong TT, Wang HW. YM500: A small RNA sequencing (smRNA-seq) database for microRNA research. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D285–D294. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1238. (Database Issue) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Li SC, Liao YL, Ho MR, Tsai KW, Lai CH, Lin WC. miRNA arm selection and isomiR distribution in gastric cancer. BMC Genomics. 2012;13(Suppl 1):S13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-S1-S13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chang HT, Li SC, Ho MR, Pan HW, Ger LP, Hu LY, Yu SY, Li WH, Tsai KW. Comprehensive analysis of microRNAs in breast cancer. BMC Genomics. 2012;13(Suppl 7):S18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-S7-S18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Li SC, Liao YL, Chan WC, Ho MR, Tsai KW, Hu LY, Lai CH, Hsu CN, Lin WC. Interrogation of rabbit miRNAs and their isomiRs. Genomics. 2011;98:453–459. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2011.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Griffiths-Jones S, Hui JH, Marco A, Ronshaugen M. MicroRNA evolution by arm switching. EMBO Rep. 2011;12:172–177. doi: 10.1038/embor.2010.191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cloonan N, Wani S, Xu Q, Gu J, Lea K, Heater S, Barbacioru C, Steptoe AL, Martin HC, Nourbakhsh E, et al. MicroRNAs and their isomiRs function cooperatively to target common biological pathways. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R126. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-12-r126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Marco A, Hui JH, Ronshaugen M, Griffiths-Jones S. Functional shifts in insect microRNA evolution. Genome Biol Evol. 2010;2:686–696. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evq053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Guo L, Li H, Liang T, Lu J, Yang Q, Ge Q, Lu Z. Consistent isomiR expression patterns and 3′ addition events in miRNA gene clusters and families implicate functional and evolutionary relationships. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39:6699–6706. doi: 10.1007/s11033-012-1493-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tsai KW, Leung CM, Lo YH, Chen TW, Chan WC, Yu SY, Tu YT, Lam HC, Li SC, Ger LP, et al. Arm selection preference of MicroRNA-193a varies in breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28176. doi: 10.1038/srep28176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kuo WT, Yu SY, Li SC, Lam HC, Chang HT, Chen WS, Yeh CY, Hung SF, Liu TC, Wu T, et al. MicroRNA-324 in Human cancer: miR-324-5p and miR-324-3p have distinct biological functions in human cancer. Anticancer Res. 2016;36:5189–5196. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lewis BP, Burge CB, Bartel DP. Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell. 2005;120:15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Oliveros JC. Venny. http://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html. An interactive tool for comparing lists with Venn's diagrams. 2007–2015 [Google Scholar]
- 31.Griffiths-Jones S, Saini HK, van Dongen S, Enright AJ. miRBase: Tools for microRNA genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:D154–D158. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm952. (Database issue) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Griffiths-Jones S, Grocock RJ, van Dongen S, Bateman A, Enright AJ. miRBase: microRNA sequences, targets and gene nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D140–D144. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj112. (Database issue) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kozomara A, Griffiths-Jones S. miRBase: Annotating high confidence microRNAs using deep sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D68–D73. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1181. (Database issue) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kozomara A, Griffiths-Jones S. miRBase: Integrating microRNA annotation and deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:D152–D157. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1027. (Database issue) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Griffiths-Jones S. The microRNA registry. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:D109–D111. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh023. (Database issue) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Liu C, Zheng L, Wang H, Ran X, Liu H, Sun X. The RCAN1 inhibits NF-κB and suppresses lymphoma growth in mice. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1929. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kohler RS, Anugraham M, López MN, Xiao C, Schoetzau A, Hettich T, Schlotterbeck G, Fedier A, Jacob F, Heinzelmann-Schwarz V. Epigenetic activation of MGAT3 and corresponding bisecting GlcNAc shortens the survival of cancer patients. Oncotarget. 2016;7:51674–51686. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chang SN, Lee JM, Oh H, Park JH. Glutathione peroxidase 3 inhibits prostate tumorigenesis in TRAMP mice. Prostate. 2016;76:1387–1398. doi: 10.1002/pros.23223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.An BC, Jung NK, Park CY, Oh IJ, Choi YD, Park JI, Lee SW. Epigenetic and glucocorticoid receptor-mediated regulation of glutathione peroxidase 3 in lung cancer cells. Mol Cells. 2016;39:631–638. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2016.0164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Slezak-Prochazka I, Durmus S, Kroesen BJ, van den Berg A. MicroRNAs, macrocontrol: Regulation of miRNA processing. Rna. 2010;16:1087–1095. doi: 10.1261/rna.1804410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Li SC, Tsai KW, Pan HW, Jeng YM, Ho MR, Li WH. MicroRNA 3′ end nucleotide modification patterns and arm selection preference in liver tissues. BMC Syst Biol. 2012;6(Suppl 2):S14. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-6-S2-S14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dixon-McIver A, East P, Mein CA, Cazier JB, Molloy G, Chaplin T, Lister Andrew T, Young BD, Debernardi S. Distinctive patterns of microRNA expression associated with karyotype in acute myeloid leukaemia. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ferretti E, De Smaele E, Miele E, Laneve P, Po A, Pelloni M, Paganelli A, Di Marcotullio L, Caffarelli E, Screpanti I, et al. Concerted microRNA control of Hedgehog signalling in cerebellar neuronal progenitor and tumour cells. EMBO J. 2008;27:2616–2627. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2008.172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Schultz J, Lorenz P, Gross G, Ibrahim S, Kunz M. MicroRNA let-7b targets important cell cycle molecules in malignant melanoma cells and interferes with anchorage-independent growth. Cell Res. 2008;18:549–557. doi: 10.1038/cr.2008.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wang Y, Lee AT, Ma JZ, Wang J, Ren J, Yang Y, Tantoso E, Li KB, Ooi LL, Tan P, Lee CG. Profiling microRNA expression in hepatocellular carcinoma reveals microRNA-224 up-regulation and apoptosis inhibitor-5 as a microRNA-224-specific target. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:13205–13215. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M707629200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Crawford M, Batte K, Yu L, Wu X, Nuovo GJ, Marsh CB, Otterson GA, Nana-Sinkam SP. MicroRNA 133B targets pro-survival molecules MCL-1 and BCL2L2 in lung cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;388:483–489. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.07.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Xu HS, Zong HL, Shang M, Ming X, Zhao JP, Ma C, Cao L. MiR-324-5p inhibits proliferation of glioma by target regulation of GLI1. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014;18:828–832. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]