Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Inherit Metab Dis. 2018 Apr 13;41(3):541–553. doi: 10.1007/s10545-018-0156-5

Recognizable phenotypes in CDG

Carlos R Ferreira 1,2, Ruqaia Altassan 3, Dorinda Marques-Da-Silva 4,5, Rita Francisco 4,5, Jaak Jaeken 3, Eva Morava 3,6
PMCID: PMC5960425  NIHMSID: NIHMS959769  PMID: 29654385

Abstract

Pattern recognition, using a group of characteristic, or discriminating features, is a powerful tool in metabolic diagnostic. A classic example of this approach is used in biochemical analysis of urine organic acid analysis, where the reporting depends more on the correlation of pertinent positive and negative findings, rather than on the absolute values of specific markers. Similar uses of pattern recognition in the field of biochemical genetics include the interpretation of data obtained by metabolomics, like glycomics, where a recognizable pattern or the presence of a specific glycan sub-fraction can lead to the direct diagnosis of certain types of congenital disorders of glycosylation. Another indispensable tool is the use of clinical pattern recognition–or syndromology–relying on careful phenotyping. While genomics might uncover variants not essential in the final clinical expression of disease, and metabolomics could point to a mixture of primary but also secondary changes in biochemical pathways, phenomics describes the clinically relevant manifestations and the full expression of the disease. In the current review we apply phenomics to the field of congenital disorders of glycosylation, focusing on recognizable differentiating findings in glycosylation disorders, characteristic dysmorphic features and malformations in PMM2-CDG, and overlapping patterns among the currently known glycosylation disorders based on their pathophysiological basis.

Keywords: Congenital disorders of glycosylation, syndrome, diagnosis, phenomics, serum transferrin, O-linked hypoglycosylation, therapy

Introduction

A phenotype is the set of all observable characteristics of an organism. The etymology of the word stems from the Greek word “phainein”, (to show) and “typos” (type), or “visible type”. Phenotyping is the oldest practice used by physicians to diagnose disease. Syndromology is a specific way of phenotyping, using a group of signs and symptoms that occur together to characterize a particular abnormality or condition. Patients born with an inborn error of metabolism can present with a genetic syndrome, showing a set of concurrent findings that form an identifiable pattern, even if the symptoms vary in severity. Congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG) belong to a rapidly expanding group of metabolic disorders, frequently present as “syndromes” (Jaeken and Peanne, 2017). In fact, they were initially discovered as a novel disease group based on careful phenotyping of the most frequent form, now known as PMM2-CDG, where patients show dysmorphic facial features–strabismus, inverted nipples, abnormal fat distribution–and a variable combination of endocrine abnormalities and coagulation defects, making the disorder recognizable. Since the description of PMM2-CDG there have been more than 130 CDG subtypes described, and the number of disorders is rapidly growing. A few of these disorders are treatable, therefore early diagnosis is very important (Dorre et al., 2015, Riley et al., 2017). Some subtypes are detectable by transferrin isoform screening or other forms of glycosylation analysis, helping the diagnostic crusade (Buczkowska et al., 2015, Bengston et al., 2016). But is there a specific clinical pattern in CDGs, which could point the clinician towards the correct diagnosis? In the current era of next-generation sequencing, is there a role for the clinician, or will the art of phenotyping succumb to molecular techniques in the –omics era? In this mini-review we structured all subtypes of CDGs described to date according to their biochemical nosology, and then attempt to establish a correspondence between certain subtypes with overlapping phenotypes and their biochemical basis. Finally, we review the existing literature on the phenotypic features associated with PMM2-CDG, and present data on computer-aided phenotyping by means of facial recognition analysis. We propose that the art of phenomics, either as performed by clinicians or with the help of currently-available technologies, continues to be very much alive, and rather than being supplanted by other –omics, it’s complementary to these.

Methods

A literature review was performed for each individual disorder of glycosylation, and a table was created with all subtypes of glycosylation disorders described to date (see Table 1). Each subtype of CDG was individually evaluated, and a concise summary was performed on those disorders that were felt to have clinical, imaging or laboratory findings that allow recognition and distinction from other disorders.

Table 1.

Current list of subtypes of congenital disorders of glycosylation

Disease Defective gene Gene locus OMIM# Defective protein Localization of defect Inheritance Paper with initial molecular characteriza tion (PMID)
N-linked glycosylation (effects)
Interconversion of monosaccharides)
PMM2-CDG PMM2 601785 Phosphomannomutase Cytosol AR 9140401
MPI-CDG MPI 154550 Phosphomannose isomerase Cytosol AR 9525984
N-glycan lipid-linked oligosaccharide assembly
DPAGT1-CDG; CMS13 DPAGT1 191350 GlcNAc-1-P transferase ER (cytosolic side) AR 12872255
ALG13-CDG in males; EEIE36 in females ALG13 300776 UDP-GlcNAc transferase ER (cytosolic side) XL 22492991
CMS15 ALG14 612866 UDP-GlcNAc transferase ER (cytosolic side) AR 23404334
ALG1-CDG ALG1 605907 β1–4 Man-transferase ER (cytosolic side) AR 14709599, 14973778, 14973782
ALG2-CDG; CMS14 ALG2 607905 α1–3/6 Man-transferase ER (cytosolic side) AR 12684507
ALG11-CDG ALG11 613666 α1–2 Man-transferase ER (cytosolic side) AR 20080937
RFT1-CDG RFT1 611908 Man5GlcNAc2-PP-Dol flippase ER AR 18313027
ALG3-CDG ALG3 608750 α1–3 Man-transferase ER (luminal side) AR 10581255
ALG9-CDG ALG9 606941 α1–2 Man-transferase ER (luminal side) AR 15148656
ALG12-CDG ALG12 607144 α1–6 Man-transferase ER (luminal side) AR 11983712
ALG6-CDG ALG6 604566 α1–3 Glc-transferase ER (luminal side) AR 10359825
ALG8-CDG ALG8 608103 α1–3 Glc-transferase ER (luminal side) AR 12480927
Glycan transfer to nascent protein
TUSC3-CDG (MRT7/MRT22) TUSC3 601385 OST subunit ER AR 18455129, 18452889
DDOST-CDG DDOST 614507 OST subunit ER AR 22305527
SST3A-CDG STT3A 601134 OST subunit ER AR 23842455
SST3B-CDG STT3B 608605 OST subunit ER AR 23842455
SSR4-CDG SSR4 300090 Translocon-associated protein, delta subunit ER AR 24218363
N-glycan processing
MOGS-CDG MOGS 601336 α1–2 glucosidase I ER AR 10788335
Polycystic kidney disease 3 GANAB 104160 α1–3 glucosidaseII subunit alpha ER AD 27259053
Polycystic liver disease 1 PRKCSH 177060 α1–3 glucosidase II subunit beta ER AD 12529853, 12577059
MAN1B1-CDG
(MRT15)
MAN1B1 604346 α1–2 mannosidase I ER AR 21763484
MGAT2-CDG MGAT2 602616 β1–2 GlcNAc-transferase II Medial-Golgi AR 8808595
B4GALT1-CDG B4GALT1 137060 β1–4 Gal-transferase Trans-Golgi AR 11901181
O-linked glycosylation defects
O-Man glycosylation
MDDGA1, MDDGB1, MDDGC1 POMT1 607423 Protein O-Man-transferase ER AR 12369018
MDDGA2, MDDGB2, MDDGC2 POMT2 607439 Protein O-Man-transferase ER AR 15894594
MDDGA3, MDDGB3, MDDGC3, RP76 POMGNT1 606822 β1–2 GlcNAc-transferase Golgi AR 11709191
MDDGA8 POMGNT2 614828 β1–4 GlcNAc-transferase ER AR 22958903
MDDGA11 B3GALNT2 610194 β1–3 GalNAc-transferase II ER AR 23453667
MDDGA12, MDDGC12 POMK 615247 Protein O-mannose kinase ER AR 23519211
MDDGA7, MDDGC7 ISPD 614631 Methyl erythritol 4-phosphate cytidylyltransfer ase Cytosol AR 22522420, 22522421
MDDGA4, MDDGB4, MDDGC4 FKTN 607440 Fukutin Golgi AR 9690476
MDDGA5, MDDGB5, MDDGC5 FKRP 606596 Fukutin-related protein Golgi AR 11592034
MDDGA10 TMEM5 605862 β1–4 xylosyltransferase Golgi AR 23217329
MDDGA13 B4GAT1 605581 β-1,3 glucuronyltransferase I Golgi AR 23359570
MDDGA6, MDDGB6 LARGE1 603590 β1–3 GlcA-transferase/α1–3 Xyl-transferase Golgi AR 12966029
O-Xyl glycosylation
Desbuquois dysplasia 2 XYLT1 608124 Xyl-transferase 1 Golgi AR 23982343
Spondyloocular syndrome XYLT2 Xyl-transferase 2 Golgi AR 26027496
Progeroid EDS 1 (Larsen of Reunion Island syndrome) B4GALT7 604327 β1–4 Gal-transferase I Golgi AR 10473568, 10506123
SEMDJL Beighton type (progeroid EDS 2) B3GALT6 615291 β1–3 Gal-transferase II Golgi AR 23664117
Larsen-like syndrome B3GAT3 606374 β1–3 GlcA-transferase I Golgi AR 21763480
MHE type 1 EXT1 608177 β1–4 GlcA-transferase II/α1–4 GlcNAc-transferase II Golgi AD 7550340
MHE type 2; Seizures, scoliosis and macrocephaly syndrome EXT2 608210 β1–4 GlcA-transferase II/α1–4 GlcNAc-transferase II Golgi AD; AR 8782816; 26246518
Immunoskeletal dysplasia with neurodevelopmental abnormalities EXTL3 α1–4 GlcNAc-transferase I and II Golgi AR 28132690, 28148688
Temtamy preaxial brachydactyly syndrome CHSY1 608183 β1–3 GlcA-transferase/β1–4 GalNAc-transferase Golgi AR 21129728
SED with congenital joint dislocations (AR Larsen syndrome, SED Omani type, humerospinal dysostosis) CHST3 603799 GalNAc-6-O-sulfotransferase Golgi AR 15215498
EDS musculocontract ural type 1 CHST14 608429 GalNAc-4-O-sulfotransferase Golgi AR 20004762
EDS musculocontractural type 2 DSE 605942 Dermatan sulfate epimerase Golgi AR 23704329
Desbuquois dysplasia CSGALNACT1 616615 β1–4 GalNAc-transferase I Golgi AR 27599773
Macular corneal dystrophy CHST6 605294 GlcNAc-6-O-sulfotransferase Golgi AR 11017086
Desbuquois dysplasia 1 CANT1 613165 UDP-Galnucleotidase ER and Golgi AR 19853239
O-GalNAc glycosylation
Hyperphosphatemic familial tumoral calcinosis GALNT3 601756 Polypeptide GalNAc-transferase Golgi AR 15133511
Tn polyagglutination syndrome C1GALT1C1 300611 Core 1 β1–3 galactosyltransferase chaperone ER Somatic 16251947
O-GlcNAc glycosylation
MRX106 OGT 300255 O-GlcNAc transferase Nucleus and cytosol XL 28302723, 28584052
Adams-Oliver syndrome 4 EOGT 614789 EGF-domain O-GlcNAc transferase ER AR 23522784
MRT12; EIEE15 ST3GAL3 606494 α2–3 Sia-transferase Golgi AR 21907012; 23252400
O-Glc glycosylation
Dowling-Degos disease 4; LGMD2Z POGLUT1 615618 Protein O-glucosyltransferase ER AD; AR 24387993; 27807076
O-Fuc glycosylation
Dowling-Degos disease 2 POFUT1 607491 Protein O-fucosyltransferase ER AD 23684010
Spondylocostal dysostosis type 3 LFNG 602576 β1–3 GlcNAc-transferase Golgi AR 16385447
Peters-Plus syndrome B3GALTL 610308 β1–3 Glc-transferase ER AR 16909395
GPI biosynthesis defects
MCAHS2
(GPIBD4, EEIE20)
PIGA 311770 GlcNAc-transferase complex, catalytic subunit ER (cytosolic side) XL 22305531
MRT62
(GPIBD16)
PIGC 601730 GlcNAc-transferase complex ER (cytosolic side) AR 27694521
PIGQ-CDG PIGQ 605754 GlcNAc-transferase complex ER (cytosolic side) AR 24463883
EIEE55
(GPIBD14)
PIGP 605938 GlcNAc-transferasecomplex ER (cytosolic side) AR 28334793
HPMRS6
(GPIBD12)
PIGY 610662 GlcNAc-transferase complex ER (cytosolic side) AR 26293662
CHIME syndrome
(GPIBD5)
PIGL 605947 GlcNAc-PI de-N-acetylase ER (cytosolic side) AR 22444671
HPMRS5
(GPIBD11)
PIGW 610275 Inositol acyltransferase ER (luminal side) AR 24367057
GPIBD1 PIGM 610273 Man-transferase 1 ER (luminal side) AR 16767100
HPMRS1
(GPIBD2)
PIGV 610274 Man-transferase 2 ER (luminal side) AR 20802478
MCAHS1
(GPIBD3)
PIGN 606097 EtNP-transferase 1 ER (luminal side) AR 21493957
HPMRS2
(GPIBD6)
PIGO 614730 EtNP-transferase 3 ER (luminal side) AR 22683086
MRT53
(GPIBD13)
PIGG 616918 EtNP-transferase 2 ER (luminal side) AR 26996948
MCAHS3
(GPIBD7)
PIGT 610272 GPI transamidase ER (luminal side) AR 23636107
GPIBD15 GPAA1 603048 GPI anchor attachment protein 1 ER (luminal side) AR 29100095
MRT42
(GPIBD9)
PGAP1 611655 Inositol deacylase ER (luminal side) AR 24784135
HPMRS4
(GPIBD10)
PGAP3 611801 Phospholipase A2 Golgi AR 24439110
HPMRS3
(GPIBD8)
PGAP2 615187 GPI-anchorremodeling protein Golgi AR 23561846, 23561847
Glycolipid glycosylation
Amish infantile epilepsy syndrome (salt and pepper syndrome) ST3GAL5 604402 α2–3 Sia-transferase Golgi AR 15502825
SPG26 B4GALNT1 601873 β1–4 GalNAc-transferase Golgi AR 23746551
NOR polyagglutination syndrome A4GALT 607922 α1–4 Gal transferase Golgi AD 22965229
Disorders of multiple pathways
Monosaccharide synthesis
CMS12 GFPT1 138292 Glutamine:F6P amidotransferase Cytosol AR 21310273
GNE myopathy; sialuria GNE 603824 UDP-GlcNAc 2-epimerase/ManNac kinase Cytosol AR; AD 11528398; 10330343
SEMD, Camera-Genevieve type NANS 605202 N-acetylneuraminic acid-9-phosphate synthase Cytosol AR 27213289
Monosaccharide interconversion
PGM1-CDG PGM1 612934 Phosphoglucomutase Cytosol AR 19625727
Immunodeficiency 23 PGM3 172100 GlcNAc phosphate mutase Cytosol AR 24589341, 24698316, 24931394
Severe congenital neutropenia 4 G6PC3 611045 Glucose-6-phosphatase ER AR 19118303
Dolichol biosynthesis
RP59 DHDDS 608172 Cis-isoprenyl transferase ER (cytosolic side) AR 21295283
NUS1-CDG NUS1 610463 Cis-isoprenyl transferase subunit ER AR 25066056
SRD5A3-CDG SRD5A3 611715 Polyprenol reductase ER AR 20637498
DOLK-CDG DOLK 610746 Dolichol kinase ER AR 17273964
Dolichol-P-sugar biosynthesis and utilization
DPM1-CDG DPM1 603503 Dol-P-Man synthase ER (cytosolic side) AR 10642597, 10642602
DPM2-CDG DPM2 603564 Dol-P-Man synthase ER AR 23109149
DPM3-CDG DPM3 605951 Dol-P-Man synthase ER AR 19576565
MPDU1-CDG MPDU1 604041 Dol-P-Man flippase ER AR 11733564
Nucleotide-sugar synthesis
CAD-CDG
(EEIE50)
CAD 114010 Carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase 2, aspartate transcarbamylase, and dihydroorotase Cytosol AR 25678555
Alacrima, achalasia, and mental retardation syndrome GMPPA 615495 GDP-mannose pyrophosphoryla se α subunit Cytosol AR 24035193
MDDGA14, MDDGB14, MDDGC14 GMPPB 615320 GDP-mannose pyrophosphoryla se β subunit Cytosol AR 23768512
Transporters
SLC35A1-CDG SLC35A1 605634 CMP-Sia transport Golgi AR 15576474
SLC35A2-CDG
(EIEE22)
SLC35A2 314375 UDP-Galactose transport Golgi AR 23561849
SLC35A3-CDG SLC35A3 605632 UDP-GlcNAc transport Golgi AR 24031089
SLC35C1-CDG SLC35C1 605881 GDP-Fuc transport Golgi AR 11326279, 11326280
Schneckenbecke n dysplasia SLC35D1 610804 UDP-GlcA/UDP-GalNAc transporter Golgi AR 17952091
SLC39A8-CDG SLC39A8 608732 Cation transporter Plasma membrane AR 26637978, 26637979
Vesicular traffickiilg
COG1-CDG COG1 606973 Conserved oligomeric Golgi complex subunit 1 Vesicular membrane/cytosol AR 16537452
COG2-CDG COG2 606974 Conserved oligomeric Golgi complex subunit 2 Vesicular membrane/cytosol AR 24784932
COG4-CDG COG4 606976 Conserved oligomeric Golgi complex subunit 4 Vesicular membrane/cytosol AR 19494034
COG5-CDG COG5 606821 Conserved oligomeric Golgi complex subunit 5 Vesicular membrane/cytosol AR 19690088
COG6-CDG
(Shaheen syndrome)
COG6 606977 Conserved oligomeric Golgi complex subunit 6 Vesicular membrane/cytosol AR 20605848
COG7-CDG COG7 606978 Conserved oligomeric Golgi complex subunit 7 Vesicular membrane/cytosol AR 15107842
COG8-CDG COG8 606979 Conserved oligomeric Golgi complex subunit 8 Vesicular membrane/cytosol AR 17220172
Autoimmune interstitial lung, joint, and kidney disease COPA 601924 COP-I subunit alpha Vesicular membrane/cytosol AD 25894502
Primary microcephaly COPB2 606990 COP-I subunit beta-2 Vesicular membrane/cytosol AR 29036432
Rhizomelic short stature with microcephaly, micrognathia, and developmental disability ARCN1 600820 COP-I subunit delta Vesicular membrane/cytosol AD 27476655
Craniolenticulos utural dysplasia (Boyadjiev-Jabs syndrome) SEC23A 61051 COPII Vesicular membrane/cytosol AR 16980979
Congenital dyserythropoietic anemia type II; Cowden syndrome 7 SEC23B 610512 COPII component Vesicular membrane/cytosol AR; AD 19561605, 19621418; 26522472
Cole-Carpenter syndrome 2 SEC24D 607186 COPII component Vesicular membrane/cytosol AR 25683121
Chylomicron retention disease SAR1B 607690 COPII GTPase Vesicular membrane/cytosol AR 12692552
Achondrogenesis IA TRIP11 604505 Golgi microtubule-associated protein 210 cis-Golgi AR 20089971
SED tarda TRAPPC2 300202 Subunit of TRAPP tethering complex Vesicular membrane/cytosol XL 10431248
TRAPPC6B-CDG TRAPPC6 B 610397 Subunit of TRAPP tethering complex Vesicular membrane/cytosol AR 28626029
MRT13 TRAPPC9 611966 Subunit of TRAPP tethering complex Vesicular membrane/cytosol AR 20004763, 20004764, 20004765
LGMD2S TRAPPC11 614138 Subunit of TRAPP tethering complex Vesicular membrane/cytosol AR 23830518
TRAPPC12-CDG TRAPPC12 614139 Subunit of TRAPP tethering complex Vesicular membrane/cytosol AR 28777934
Golgi homeostasis
Autosomal recessive cutis laxa type IIA (wrinkly skin syndrome) ATP6V0A2 611716 Subunit of vacuolar ATPase Vacuolar membrane AR 18157129
Immunodeficiency 47 ATP6AP1 300197 Subunit of vacuolar ATPase Vacuolar membrane XL 27231034
X-linked mental retardation, Hedera type; X-linked parkinsonism with spasticity ATP6AP2 300556 Subunit of vacuolar ATPase Vacuolar membrane XL 15746149
Autosomal recessive cutis laxa type IID ATP6V1A 607027 Subunit of vacuolar ATPase Vacuolar membrane AR 28065471
Autosomal recessive cutis laxa type IIC ATP6V1E1 108746 Subunit of vacuolar ATPase Vacuolar membrane AR 28065471
TMEM199-CDG TMEM199 616815 Assembly factor for vacuolar ATPase Vacuolar membrane AR 26833330
CCDC115-CDG CCDC115 613734 Assembly factor for vacuolar ATPase Vacuolar membrane AR 26833332
X-linked myopathy with excessive autophagy VMA21 300913 Assembly factor for vacuolar ATPase Vacuolar membrane XL 23315026
TMEM165-CDG TMEM165 614726 Ca2+/H+ antiporter Golgi AR 22683087
Unknown
Catel-Manzke syndrome TGDS 616146 TDP-Glc 4,6-dehydratase Unknown AR 25480037

Abbreviations: AD, autosomal dominant; AR, autosomal recessive; CMS, congenital myasthenic syndrome; CS, chondroitin sulfate; DS, dermatan sulfate; EDS, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome; EGF, epidermal growth factor-like; EIEE, early infantile epileptic encephalopathy; EtNP, ethanolamine phosphate; F6P, fructose 6-phosphate; GPIBD, glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis defect; HPMRS, hyperphosphatasia with mental retardation syndrome; HS, heparin sulfate; KS, keratan sulfate; LGMD, limb-girdle muscular dystrophy; MCAHS, multiple congenital anomalies-hypotonia-seizures syndrome MDDG, muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy; MHE, multiple hereditary exostoses; MRT, mental retardation; Neu5Ac, N-acetylneuraminic acid; PI, phosphatidylinositol; OST, oligosaccharyltransferase; RP, retinitis pigmentosa; SED, spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia; SEMDJL, spondyloepimetaphyseal dysplasia with joint laxity; SPG, spastic paraplegia; TSR, thrombospondin type 1 repeats; XL, X-linked.

Next, a literature review was performed on congenital malformations in PMM2-CDG, using a PubMed search. PubMed database search was performed using the following terms: Congenital disorder(s) of glycosylation, type Ia OR PMM2 OR PMM2-CDG OR phosphomannomutase 2 deficiency OR Jaeken syndrome OR CDG-Ia OR carbohydrate deficient glycoprotein syndrome plus Anomaly OR malformation OR Malformation OR dysmorphic. All the publications were included in the search from the time of the disorder discovery, i.e. 1980. Only patients with confirmed PMM2 mutations or enzymatically-confirmed phosphomannomutase 2 deficiency were included.

A total of 165 papers were reviewed. Reported cases were collected and summarized in an Excel table (Supplementary Table 1). In total, 561 patients were reported in the literature with confirmed PMM2-CDG.

Finally, we performed facial recognition analysis using the Facial Dysmorphology Novel Analysis (FDNA, Boston MA, USA) technology, which allows for assessment of subtle craniofacial dysmorphic features and facial pattern recognition. The input consisted of 53 facial frontal photos from 50 unaffected controls, as well as photos 18 patients with confirmed PMM2-CDG. A binary comparison was then performed between groups, and the capacity to distinguish them was assessed by measuring the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, which plots the true positive rate as function of the true negative rate. An AUC of 1 indicates perfect accuracy, while an AUC of 0.5 is the performance obtained by a totally random system (as for example a coin toss). Cross validation was performed by recurrently and randomly splitting the data into training sets, each set contained half of the photos. This random split was repeated 10 times (Lumaka et al. 2017).

Results

Recognizable phenotypes in congenital disorders of glycosylation

(Type 1 serum transferrin N-hypoglycosylation pattern: *, type 2 N-hypoglycosylation pattern: **, O-linked hypoglycosylation#, GPI-anchoring deficiency ##)

MPI-CDG*

MPI-CDG presents with liver disease (hepatomegaly and hepatopathy, cirrhosis), coagulopathy (increased bleeding tendency and risk for thrombotic episodes), hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia, and gastrointestinal symptoms (chronic diarrhea, protein-losing enteropathy). It is treatable by mannose (200 mg/kg 4–6 times a day). Some patients need liver transplantation. There is normal intellectual development.

PMM2-CDG*

PMM2-CDG is the most common N-glycosylation abnormality. Strabismus, large ears, thin upper lip, inverted nipples, abnormal fat distribution and developmental delay (intellectual disability in most cases) are characteristic. Coagulation abnormalities, thrombotic events, stroke-like episodes, hepatopathy, endocrine abnormalities are not detectable in all patients, although hypogonadism is prevalent. Cerebellar hypoplasia can be present as early as the neonatal period.

GFPT1-CDG, DPAGT1-CDG*, ALG14-CDG, ALG2-CDG *

All of these subtypes can present with disordered neurotransmission in the form of myasthenia. In addition, DPAGT1-CDG and ALG2-CDG can present with a multisystemic disorder.

RFT1-CDG*, ALG11-CDG*

Both subtypes are associated with developmental delay, seizures and intellectual disability, all rather non-specific findings, but unlike other CDG subtypes, they are frequently accompanied by sensorineural hearing loss.

ALG6-CDG* and ALG8-CDG*

Patients with ALG6-CDG have developmental disability, proximal muscle weakness, seizures and in most cases ataxia. Brachydactyly and finger malformations have been described in several patients. ALG8-CDG is also accompanied by brachydactyly, as well as intellectual disability and dysmorphic features including low-set ears, hypertelorism and macroglossia.

ALG3-CDG*, ALG9-CDG* and ALG12-CDG*

The severe form of ALG9-CDG (Gillessen-Kaesbach-Nishimura syndrome) is accompanied by polycystic kidneys, hepatic fibrosis, congenital heart disease, and characteristic skeletal changes including mesomelia, a round pelvis, shortened sacrosciatic notch and ovoid ischia, hypomineralization of skull, cervical vertebral bodies, and pubic rami, and thick occipital bone. Similar skeletal anomalies were described in ALG3-CDG and ALG12-CDG.

MGAT2-CDG**

MGAT2-CDG is a disorder with recognizable facial features (long eyelashes, prominent nasal bridge, underdeveloped alae nasi, low-hanging columella, thin vermillion of the upper lip, thick vermillion of the lower lip). This disease is also characterized by severe growth delay, mental disability with absent speech and in some patients, radio-ulnar synostosis.

MAN1B1-CDG**#

MAN1B1-CDG is a Golgi CDG with intellectual disability and, in most patients, facial dysmorphism (widely spaced eyes with down-slanting palpebral fissures, long ears, underdeveloped naso-labial fold, thin vermillion of the upper lip) and truncal obesity.

SRD5A3-CDG*

SRD5A3-CDG is a syndromal form of a dolicholphosphate synthesis defect; patients have eye malformations (cataract, retinal anomalies, glaucoma, visual loss), cerebellar ataxia and in about one third of the cases ichthyosiform skin anomalies. Developmental disability is mostly severe.

DOLK-CDG*

DOLK-CDG is usually associated with a multisystem phenotype, with neurologic, endocrine and coagulation abnormalities. A discriminative feature is dilated cardiomyopathy. Milder cases benefit from early cardiac transplantation.

DPM1-CDG*, DPM2-CDG* and DPM3-CDG*

All of these subtypes lead to alpha-dystroglycan hypoglycosylation, elevated creatine kinase levels and muscle dystrophy. Unlike other phenotypes of alpha-dystroglycanopathies, patients with either of these three forms of CDG also show abnormal transferrin glycosylation in serum.

COG1-CDG**

COG1-CDG patients show variable phenotypic features and variable severity. Some patients have been described with a costo-cerebro-mandibular-like syndrome.

COG7-CDG**

COG7-CDG is recognizable in most patients based on microcephaly, growth impairment, adducted thumbs, ventricular septal defect and episodes of hyperthermia.

SLC35C1-CDG**

SLC35C1-CDG is a disorder with frequent infections, neutrophilia and distinct facial features including brachycephaly, low insertion of the anterior hairline, coarse features, puffy eyelids, flat nasal bridge, large tongue, long upper lip with everted lower lips. Patients also have a rare blood type, the Bombay blood group. The immune phenotype improves with oral fucose supplementation.

ATP6V0A2-CDG**#

ATP6V0A2-CDG is also called autosomal recessive cutis laxa type 2A (ARCL2A). Generalized congenital sagging skin, cutis laxa, abnormal fat distribution, motor developmental disability, skeletal abnormalities, short stature, and joint luxation are characteristic. Intellectual development can be normal. Cutis laxa improves with age. Some patients have cobblestone-like brain dysgenesis and seizures.

ATP6V1A-CDG and ATP6V1E1-CDG**#

ATP6V1A-CDG and ATP6V1E1-CDG patients are very similar to those diagnosed with ATP6V0A2-CDG. They have generalized cutis laxa, motor and intellectual developmental disability, cardiac involvement and hypercholesterolemia. Cutis laxa improves with age.

ATP6AP1-CDG and ATP6AP2-CDG**#

ATP6AP1-CDG and ATP6AP2-CDG both present with early liver disease (cholestasis, fibrosis, cirrhosis). Frequent infections are mostly associated with hypogammaglobulinemia. Early symptoms include cutis laxa, which disappears with age.

TMEM199-CDG and CCDC115-CDG**#

TMEM199-CDG and CCDC115-CDG also present with early liver disease (cholestasis, fibrosis, cirrhosis) as well as hypercholesterolemia, low serum ceruloplasmin and developmental disability. These conditions can mimic Wilson disease, given the liver disease with hypoceruloplasminemia. Liver transplantation is a therapeutic option.

TMEM165-CDG**#

TMEM165-CDG is a recognizable spondyloepimetaphyseal skeletal dysplasia with extreme osteopenia, short stature, hyperinsulinism, growth hormone deficiency and variable intellectual disability. Galactose treatment (1g/kg/day) showed biochemical improvement of glycosylated proteins in blood.

SLC39A8-CDG**#

SLC39A-CDG is a multisystem disorder with seizures. Several patients show a skeletal dysplasia with rhizomelic shortening and dwarfism. Not all patients have abnormal transferrin isoform analysis. Laboratory examinations, however, reveal low blood manganese and zinc concentrations, with increased urinary concentration from renal wasting. Patients show clinical and biochemical improvement on galactose (1g/kg/day) and individually dosed oral manganese therapy.

PGM1-CDG*/**

PGM1-CDG is a disorder with midline malformations (Pierre-Robin sequence, bifid uvula, cleft palate), hepatopathy, muscle weakness, cardiomyopathy and hypoglycaemia. This is an unusual CDG in that the type 2 transferrin pattern hides a combined type 1/type 2 defect. Galactose treatment (1g/kg/day) showed biochemical improvement of blood glycoproteins and liver function tests.

GMPPA-CDG

GMPPA-CDG is accompanied by alacrima, achalasia, and intellectual disability. Although NGLY1 deficiency can have alacrima and intellectual disability, patients don’t have achalasia. Triple A syndrome can present alacrima and achalasia, but patients also have adrenal insufficiency, not seen in GMPPA-CDG.

PIGL-CDG##

PIGL-CDG is also known as CHIME syndrome, an acronym that describes its salient features of ocular Colobomas, congenital Heart disease, early-onset Ichthyosis, Mental retardation and Ear anomalies (conductive hearing loss).

PIGM-CDG##

PIGM-CDG is characterized by portal vein thrombosis and seizures. The seizures can improve with sodium butyrate, which increases transcription.

Phenotype of PMM2-CDG

The following congenital anomalies were reported in patients with confirmed PMM2-CDG.

Strabismus

Strabismus was described in 290 of 395 patients (73 %). In the available case series of 10 or more patients, the frequency of strabismus has been variably reported as 36 of 56 patients, or 64 % (Erlandson et al. 2001), 8 of 10 patients (Thompson et al. 2013) and 16 of 20 (de Lonlay et al. 2001), or 80 %, 25 of 28 patients, or 89 % (Monin et al. 2014), 12 of 13, or 92 % (Serrano et al. 2015), and 17 of 17 (Honzík et al. 2012), 23 of 23 (Kjaergaard et al. 2001), or 33 of 33 patients (Grünewald et al. 2001).

Inverted nipples

Inverted nipples were seen in 183 of 343 patients (53%). In the available case series of 10 or more patients, the frequency of inverted nipples has been variably reported as 5 of 20 patients, or 25 % (Barone et al. 2015), 3 of 11 adult patients, or 27 % (Monin et al. 2014), 9 of 26, or 35 % (Briones et al. 2002), 36 % out of 66 patients (Pérez et al. 2011), 10 of 26, or 38 % (Grünewald et al. 2001), 7 of 10 patients (Thompson et al. 2013), 10 of 13, or 77 % (Imtiaz et al. 2000), 16 of 17 patients, or 94 % (Honzík et al. 2012)–although it disappeared over time in 6 of those 16 patients–and in 23 of 23 patients (Kjaergaard et al. 2001), although it disappeared over time in 2 of them. It can sometimes be unilateral (van de Kamp et al. 2007; Léticée et al. 2010).

Abnormal fat distribution

Abnormal fat distribution was reported in 168 out of 357 patients (47 %). In the available case series of 10 or more patients, the frequency of abnormal fat distribution has been variably reported as 5 of 20 patients, or 25 % (Barone et al. 2015), 27% of 66 patients (Pérez et al. 2011), 7 of 19 adult patients, or 37 % (Monin et al. 2014), 10 of 26, or 38 % of patients (Grünewald et al. 2001), 4 of 10 (Thompson et al. 2013), and 21 of 23, or 91 % (Kjaergaard et al. 2001), but it disappeared over time in 9 of those 21 patients. A specific review of abnormal fat distribution found it in 24 of 32 patients, or 75 % (Wolthuis et al. 2013).

Dysmorphic facial features

Dysmorphic features have been described in large series in 29 % of 66 patients (Pérez et al. 2011), 11 of 20, or 55 % (de Lonlay et al. 2001), and 24 of 37, or 65 % of patients (Barone et al. 2015), including a prominent forehead, large ears and ear lobules, thin upper lip, prominent jaw, and long and slender fingers and toes. The prominent jaw develops over time, as the mandible can start as retrognathic (Al-Maawali et al. 2014). Almond-shaped eyes have also been frequently described, including in 7 of a series of 13 patients (Serrano et al. 2015). Other features reported in more than single patients include skin/peau d’orange in 7 (Clayton et al. 1992; Vabres et al. 1998; de Michelena et al. 1999; Stark et al. 2000; Noelle et al. 2005; van de Kamp et al. 2007), dysplastic ears (cupped, anteverted or crumpled) in 7 patients (Clayton et al. 1992; Garel et al. 1998; Tayebi et al. 2002; Rudaks et al. 2012; Resende et al. 2014; Serrano et al. 2015), low-set ears in 6 (Clayton et al. 1992; Imtiaz et al. 2000; Al-Maawali et al. 2014; Serrano et al. 2015), long philtrum in 6 (Harding et al. 1988; Pavone et al. 1996; Morava et al. 2004; van de Kamp et al. 2007; Kasapkara et al. 2017), high-arched palate in 5 (Tayebi et al. 2002; Bubel et al. 2002; Işıkay et al. 2014; Kasapkara et al. 2017), long face in 3 (de Michelena et al. 1999; Tayebi et al. 2002), narrow/short palpebral fissures in 3 (Truin et al. 2008; Işıkay et al. 2014), epicanthal folds in 2 (Tayebi et al. 2002; Enns et al. 2002), prominent nose in 2 (Barone et al. 2008; Thong et al. 2009), and anteverted nares in 2 (Tayebi et al. 2002; Morava et al. 2004). Other features variably reported included hypertelorism in 2 (Edwards et al. 2006; Kasapkara et al. 2017), but hypotelorism in 2 (Pavone et al. 1996); downslanted palpebral fissures in 3 (Clayton et al. 1992; Bubel et al. 2002), while others had upslanted palpebral fissures (Kjaergaard et al. 2001; Brum et al. 2008); flat nasal bridge in 5 (Harding et al. 1988; Tayebi et al. 2002; Thong et al. 2009; Al-Maawali et al. 2014; Kasapkara et al. 2017) but high nasal bridge in 4 (Artigas et al. 1998; Antoun et al. 1999; Laplace et al. 2003). A coarse face has been described in older adults (Bortot et al. 2013; Barone et al. 2015).

Congenital cardiac malformations

Conotruncal heart defects were described in a few patients, including tetralogy of Fallot in 3 patients (Vermeer et al. 2007; Romano et al. 2009; Al Teneiji et al. 2017), while common arterial trunk (also known as truncus arteriosus) was reported in 2 (Romano et al. 2009; Serrano et al. 2015, Marques-da-Silva et al. 2017).

Congenital airway and lung malformations

No malformations have been reported so far in PMM2-CDG patients.

Congenital liver and bile duct malformations

No liver and bile duct malformations have been reported so far in PMM2-CDG patients. Fibrotic changes and bile duct dilatation described in a few cases appeared later during the course of disease compared to other CDGs, like MPI-CDG (Marques-da-Silva et al. 2017)

Congenital urogenital malformations

Hydrocele, inguinal hernia and/or cryptorchidism was seen in 10 of 12 boys in one series (Kjaergaard et al. 2001), while cryptorchidism was described in 4 other patients (Veneselli et al. 1998; Garel et al. 1998; Truin et al. 2008; Resende et al. 2014). The most commonly reported malformations were multicystic kidneys, reported in seventeen patients (thirteen detected by ultrasound, three by renal biopsy and one by autopsy) followed by enlarged kidney size in four patients, and hydronephrosis in one patient (Schiff et al. 2017, van de Kamp et al. 2007, Hertz-Pannier et al. 2006, De Lonlay et al. 2001).

Facial recognition analysis of PMM2-CDG

For the facial phenotypic analysis of patients with PMM2-CDG, a composite image of unaffected controls vs that of patients can be found in figures 2A–B. Facial recognition analysis allowed for the discrimination of patients with PMM2-CDG vs controls, with an AUC of 0.84 (p value 0.014, see figures 2C–D).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Diagram on the different steps in lipid-linked oligosaccharide assembly.

Discussion

Here we define the PMM2-CDG phenotype, which is recognizable in at least 50% of the patients based on the presence of strabismus and inverted nipples and abnormal fat distribution. However, not only the inverted nipples and abnormal fat distribution, but also the facial phenotype seems to be recognizable among patients with PMM2-CDG. In particular, commonly reported facial dysmorphic features included almond-shaped eyes, large ears in relation to the (variably) decreased head circumference, a thin vermillion of the upper lip, short nose with long, smooth philtrum, and over time also prognathism. Although not reported in the literature, deep-set eyes and high-arched eyebrows are also often found in the authors’ experience. Another dysmorphic finding frequently reported in the literature is arachnodactyly.

It is easy to understand why patients with mutations in genes involved in similar pathways would have similar symptoms. For example, it is understandable that mutations in 12 genes involved in the O-glycosylation of alpha-dystroglycan would all lead to a similar phenotype of muscular dystrophy, since glycosylation is essential for the anchoring function of dystroglycan (Endo 2015). However, by the same token it is hard to explain how mutations in certain genes involved in N-glycosylation could lead to such discrepant phenotypes. Since the transfer of the lipid-linked oligosaccharide (LLO) from the dolichol carrier to the nascent protein in the ER happens en bloc, in theory a deficiency of any of the 14 enzymes involved in the synthesis of the LLO would lead to a similar clinical presentation, as all would lead to the same deficient N-glycosylation of the nascent protein. However, this is not the case, and the phenotypes appear to be clustered instead. For example, a defect in the synthesis of UDP-GlcNAc (as in GFPT1-CDG) or proteins participating in the addition of the first or second GlcNAc to the LLO (DPAGT1- and ALG14-CDG, respectively) all cause a similar phenotype of congenital myasthenic syndrome (Wu et al. 2003; Senderek et al. 2011; Cossins et al. 2013). A defect in the addition of the fourth and fifth mannoses (ALG11-CDG) and of the immediate next step of flipping the LLO from the cytoplasmic to the luminal side of the ER (RFT1-CDG) both lead to sensorineural hearing loss, a finding that is otherwise quite rare in other types of CDG (Vleugels et al. 2009a; Rind et al. 2010; Regal et al. 2015). Defects in the addition of the last four mannoses in the luminal side of the ER (ALG3-CDG, ALG9-CDG and ALG12-CDG) are associated with very characteristic skeletal changes, defined by mesomelic brachymelia, round pelvis, shortened sacrosciatic notch and ovoid ischia, hypomineralization of the skull, cervical vertebral bodies, and pubic rami, and a thick occipital bone (Tham et al. 2016). These skeletal findings are not similar to those seen in any of the other CDGs. Finally, defects in the next two steps in the synthesis of the LLO, meaning the addition of the first (ALG6-CDG) and second (ALG8-CDG) Glc lead to brachydactyly (Höck et al. 2015; Morava et al. 2016), while the most common type of CDG is associated with the opposite phenotype of long and slender fingers and toes. See figure 2 for a diagram depicting the aforementioned enzymatic steps.

This clustering of phenotypes is puzzling, since again all of these steps occur prior to the en bloc transfer of the glycan chain to the protein. The explanation for this phenotype clustering can thus not solely be related to protein hypoglycosylation. One possibility is that the accumulated LLOs themselves, or modifications of these, could in some way be toxic. For example, the cytosolic accumulation of Man3GlcNAc2-PP-Dol or Man4GlcNAc2-PP-Dol could lead to damage of the inner ear cells, while ER accumulation of Man5GlcNAc2-PP-Dol to Man8GlcNAc2-PP-Dol could lead to a reproducible skeletal dysplasia, and ER accumulation of Man9GlcNAc2-PP-Dol or GlcMan9GlcNAc2-PP-Dol would lead to brachydactyly as opposed to arachnodactyly. Alternatively, it is possible that the pathogenesis of these disorders is not only related to protein hypoglycosylation, but also to protein misglycosylation, with truncated LLOs, since it is known that truncated LLOs can indeed be transferred to the nascent protein, either with decreased efficiency (Krasnewich at el. 1995, Panneerselvam & Freeze 1996; Vleugels et al. 2009b). Even in the latter scenario, proteins that are misglycosylated with specific truncated LLOs as above could lead to the clustered phenotypes described.

It is clear that our understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms leading to the different phenotypes seen in CDG patients is still poor. However, the rapid scientific advances that ushered in the next-generation sequencing should not deter us from careful patient phenotyping, the oldest tool in the physician’s armamentarium. Next-generation sequencing should lead to next-generation phenotyping, and the different –omics should be complementary with the process of phenomics.

Supplementary Material

10545_2018_156_MOESM1_ESM

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Facial recognition analysis of patients with PMM2-CDG.

A: Composite photo created by averaging the extracted mathematical information of the photos in the control cohort. B: Composite photo obtained from images of patients with PMM2-CDG. C: Score distribution of the binary comparison between unaffected controls and patients with PMM2-CDG. D: ROC curve with pertinent statistics obtained after conducting 10 random splits (true positive rate on the ordinate, true negative rate on abscissa).

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by the 1805218N FWO subsidie, in part by the Hayward Foundation and by 1 U54 GM104940 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health, which funds the Louisiana Clinical and Translational Science Center. Additionally this work was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the ERA-NET Cofund action N° 643578 –EURO-CDG-2

Footnotes

Compliance with ethical standards

Contribution

Carlos Ferreira and Eva Morava: study design, data collection, composing manuscript

Ruqaiah Altassan: study design and data collection

Rita Francesco, Dorinda Marquez-Da-Silva: data collection

Jaak Jaeken: study design, revision of manuscript

Conflicts of interest

Carlos R. Ferreira, Ruqaiah Altassan, Rita Francesco, Dorinda Marquez-Da-Silva, Jaak Jaeken and Eva Morava declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participant were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee.

References

  1. Al Teneiji A, Bruun TUJ, Sidky S, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic spectrum of congenital disorders of glycosylation type I and type II. Mol Genet Metab. 2017;120:235–242. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2016.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Maawali AA, Miller E, Schulze A, et al. Subcutaneous fat pads on body MRI–an early sign of congenital disorder of glycosylation PMM2-CDG (CDG1a) Pediatr Radiol. 2014;44:222–225. doi: 10.1007/s00247-013-2782-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Antoun H, Villeneuve N, Gelot A, et al. Cerebellar atrophy: an important feature of carbohydrate deficient glycoprotein syndrome type 1. Pediatr Radiol. 1999;29:194–198. doi: 10.1007/s002470050571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Artigas J, Cardo E, Pineda M, et al. Phosphomannomutase deficiency and normal pubertal development. J Inherit Metab Dis. 1998;21:78–79. doi: 10.1023/a:1005323700680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barone R, Carrozzi M, Parini R, et al. A nationwide survey of PMM2-CDG in Italy: high frequency of a mild neurological variant associated with the L32R mutation. J Neurol. 2015;262:154–164. doi: 10.1007/s00415-014-7549-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barone R, Sturiale L, Sofia V, et al. Clinical phenotype correlates to glycoprotein phenotype in a sib pair with CDG-Ia. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146A:2103–2108. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bengtson P, Ng BG, Jaeken J, et al. Serum transferrin carrying the xeno-tetrasaccharide NeuAc-Gal-GlcNAc2 is a biomarker of ALG1-CDG. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2016;39(1):107–14. doi: 10.1007/s10545-015-9884-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bortot B, Cosentini D, Faletra F, et al. PMM2-CDG: phenotype and genotype in four affected family members. Gene. 2013;531:506–509. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.07.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Briones P, Vilaseca MA, Schollen E, et al. Biochemical and molecular studies in 26 Spanish patients with congenital disorder of glycosylation type Ia. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2002;25:635–646. doi: 10.1023/a:1022825113506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brum JM, Rizzo IMP de O, de Mello WD, Speck-Martins CE. Congenital disorder of glycosylation type Ia: a non-progressive encephalopathy associated with multisystemic involvement. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2008;66:545–548. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2008000400021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bubel S, Peters V, Klein C, et al. CDG (congenital disorders of glycosylation). Differential hereditary ataxia in adulthood diagnosis. Nervenarzt. 2002;73:754–760. doi: 10.1007/s00115-002-1351-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Buczkowska A, Swiezewska E, Lefeber DJ. Genetic defects in dolichol metabolism. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2015 Jan;38(1):157–69. doi: 10.1007/s10545-014-9760-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Clayton PT, Winchester BG, Keir G. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy in a neonate with the carbohydrate-deficient glycoprotein syndrome. J Inherit Metab Dis. 1992;15:857–861. doi: 10.1007/BF01800221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cossins J, Belaya K, Hicks D, et al. Congenital myasthenic syndromes due to mutations in ALG2 and ALG14. Brain J Neurol. 2013;136:944–956. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. de Lonlay P, Seta N, Barrot S, et al. A broad spectrum of clinical presentations in congenital disorders of glycosylation I: a series of 26 cases. J Med Genet. 2001;38:14–19. doi: 10.1136/jmg.38.1.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. de Michelena MI, Franchi LM, Summers PG, et al. Carbohydrate-deficient glycoprotein syndrome due to phosphomannomutase deficiency: the first reported cases from Latin America. Am J Med Genet. 1999;84:481–483. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19990611)84:5<481::aid-ajmg13>3.3.co;2-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dörre K, Olczak M, Wada Y, et al. A new case of UDP-galactose transporter deficiency (SLC35A2-CDG): molecular basis, clinical phenotype, and therapeutic approach. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2015;38(5):931–40. doi: 10.1007/s10545-015-9828-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Edwards M, McKenzie F, O’callaghan S, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital disorder of glycosylation type Ia (CDG-Ia) by cordocentesis and transferrin isoelectric focussing of serum of a 27-week fetus with non-immune hydrops. Prenat Diagn. 2006;26:985–988. doi: 10.1002/pd.1543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Endo T. Glycobiology of α-dystroglycan and muscular dystrophy. J Biochem. 2015;157(1):1–12. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvu066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Enns GM, Steiner RD, Buist N, et al. Clinical and molecular features of congenital disorder of glycosylation in patients with type 1 sialotransferrin pattern and diverse ethnic origins. J Pediatr. 2002;141:695–700. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2002.128658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Erlandson A, Bjursell C, Stibler H, et al. Scandinavian CDG-Ia patients: genotype/phenotype correlation and geographic origin of founder mutations. Hum Genet. 2001;108:359–367. doi: 10.1007/s004390100489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Garel C, Baumann C, Besnard M, et al. Carbohydrate-deficient glycoprotein syndrome type I: a new cause of dysostosis multiplex. Skeletal Radiol. 1998;27:43–45. doi: 10.1007/s002560050335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Grünewald S, Schollen E, Van Schaftingen E, et al. High residual activity of PMM2 in patients’ fibroblasts: possible pitfall in the diagnosis of CDG-Ia (phosphomannomutase deficiency) Am J Hum Genet. 2001;68:347–354. doi: 10.1086/318199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Harding BN, Dunger DB, Grant DB, Erdohazi M. Familial olivopontocerebellar atrophy with neonatal onset: a recessively inherited syndrome with systemic and biochemical abnormalities. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988;51:385–390. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.51.3.385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hertz-Pannier L, Déchaux M, Sinico M, et al. Congenital disorders of glycosylation type I: a rare but new cause of hyperechoic kidneys in infants and children due to early microcystic changes. Pediatr Radiol. 2006;36(2):108–14. doi: 10.1007/s00247-005-0001-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Höck M, Wegleiter K, Ralser E, et al. ALG8-CDG: novel patients and review of the literature. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015;10:73. doi: 10.1186/s13023-015-0289-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Honzík T, Magner M, Krijt J, et al. Clinical picture of S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase deficiency resembles phosphomannomutase 2 deficiency. Mol Genet Metab. 2012;107:611–613. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2012.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Imtiaz F, Worthington V, Champion M, et al. Genotypes and phenotypes of patients in the UK with carbohydrate-deficient glycoprotein syndrome type 1. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2000;23:162–174. doi: 10.1023/a:1005669900330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Işıkay S, Başpınar O, Yılmaz K. A case of congenital disorder of glycosylation ia presented with recurrent pericardial effusion. Iran J Pediatr. 2014;24:652–654. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jaeken J, Péanne R. What is new in CDG? J Inherit Metab Dis. 2017;40(4):569–586. doi: 10.1007/s10545-017-0050-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kasapkara ÇS, Barış Z, Kılıç M, et al. PMM2-CDG and sensorineural hearing loss. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2017 doi: 10.1007/s10545-017-0073-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kjaergaard S, Schwartz M, Skovby F. Congenital disorder of glycosylation type Ia (CDG-Ia): phenotypic spectrum of the R141H/F119L genotype. Arch Dis Child. 2001;85:236–239. doi: 10.1136/adc.85.3.236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Krasnewich DM, Holt GD, Brantly M, et al. Abnormal synthesis of dolichol-linked oligosaccharides in carbohydrate-deficient glycoprotein syndrome. Glycobiology. 1995;5(5):503–10. doi: 10.1093/glycob/5.5.503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Laplace O, Voegtle R, Rigolet M-H, et al. Early ocular manifestations in an infant with carbohydrate-deficient glycoprotein syndrome type Ia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2003;40:179–181. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-20030501-18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Léticée N, Bessières-Grattagliano B, Dupré T, et al. Should PMM2-deficiency (CDG Ia) be searched in every case of unexplained hydrops fetalis? Mol Genet Metab. 2010;101:253–257. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2010.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lumaka A, Cosemans N, Lulebo Mampasi A, et al. Facial dysmorphism is influenced by ethnic background of the patient and of the evaluator. Clin Genet. 2017;92:166–171. doi: 10.1111/cge.12948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Malhotra A, Pateman A, Chalmers R, et al. Prenatal cardiac ultrasound finding in congenital disorder of glycosylation type 1a. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2009;25(1):54–7. doi: 10.1159/000196816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Marques-da-Silva D, Dos Reis Ferreira V, Monticelli M, et al. Liver involvement in congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG). A systematic review of the literature. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2017;40(2):195–207. doi: 10.1007/s10545-016-0012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Marques-da-Silva D, Francisco R, Webster D, et al. Cardiac complications of congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG): a systematic review of the literature. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2017;40(5):657–672. doi: 10.1007/s10545-017-0066-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Monin M-L, Mignot C, De Lonlay P, et al. 29 French adult patients with PMM2-congenital disorder of glycosylation: outcome of the classical pediatric phenotype and depiction of a late-onset phenotype. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014;9:207. doi: 10.1186/s13023-014-0207-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Morava E, Cser B, Kárteszi J, et al. Screening for CDG type Ia in Joubert syndrome. Med Sci Monit Int Med J Exp Clin Res. 2004;10:CR469–472. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Morava E, Tiemes V, Thiel C, et al. ALG6-CDG: a recognizable phenotype with epilepsy, proximal muscle weakness, ataxia and behavioral and limb anomalies. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2016;39:713–723. doi: 10.1007/s10545-016-9945-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Noelle V, Knuepfer M, Pulzer F, et al. Unusual presentation of congenital disorder of glycosylation type 1a: congenital persistent thrombocytopenia, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and hydrops-like aspect due to marked peripheral oedema. Eur J Pediatr. 2005;164:223–226. doi: 10.1007/s00431-004-1611-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Panneerselvam K, Freeze HH. Mannose corrects altered N-glycosylation in carbohydrate-deficient glycoprotein syndrome fibroblasts. J Clin Invest. 1996;97(6):1478–87. doi: 10.1172/JCI118570. 15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Pavone L, Fiumara A, Barone R, et al. Olivopontocerebellar atrophy leading to recognition of carbohydrate-deficient glycoprotein syndrome type I. J Neurol. 1996;243:700–705. doi: 10.1007/BF00873975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Pérez B, Briones P, Quelhas D, et al. The molecular landscape of phosphomannose mutase deficiency in iberian peninsula: identification of 15 population-specific mutations. JIMD Rep. 2011;1:117–123. doi: 10.1007/8904_2011_26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Regal L, van Hasselt PM, Foulquier F, et al. ALG11-CDG: Three novel mutations and further characterization of the phenotype. Mol Genet Metab Rep. 2015;2:16–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2014.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Resende C, Carvalho C, Alegria A, et al. Congenital disorders of glycosylation with neonatal presentation. BMJ Case Rep. 2014 doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-010037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Riley LG, Cowley MJ, Gayevskiy V, et al. A SLC39A8 variant causes manganese deficiency, and glycosylation and mitochondrial disorders. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2017;40(2):261–269. doi: 10.1007/s10545-016-0010-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Rind N, Schmeiser V, Thiel C, et al. A severe human metabolic disease caused by deficiency of the endoplasmatic mannosyltransferase hALG11 leads to congenital disorder of glycosylation-Ip. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19:1413–1424. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Romano S, Bajolle F, Valayannopoulos V, et al. Conotruncal heart defects in three patients with congenital disorder of glycosylation type Ia (CDG Ia) J Med Genet. 2009;46:287–288. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2008.057620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Rudaks LI, Andersen C, Khong TY, et al. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with cardiac rupture and tamponade caused by congenital disorder of glycosylation type Ia. Pediatr Cardiol. 2012;33:827–830. doi: 10.1007/s00246-012-0214-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Senderek J, Müller JS, Dusl M, et al. Hexosamine biosynthetic pathway mutations cause neuromuscular transmission defect. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;88:162–172. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Serrano M, de Diego V, Muchart J, et al. Phosphomannomutase deficiency (PMM2-CDG): ataxia and cerebellar assessment. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015;10:138. doi: 10.1186/s13023-015-0358-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Stark KL, Gibson JB, Hertle RW, Brodsky MC. Ocular motor signs in an infant with carbohydrate-deficient glycoprotein syndrome type Ia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130:533–535. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(00)00569-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Schiff M, Roda C, Monin ML, et al. Clinical, laboratory and molecular findings and long-term follow-up data in 96 French patients with PMM2-CDG (phosphomannomutase 2-congenital disorder of glycosylation) and review of the literature. J Med Genet. 2017;54(12):843–851. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tayebi N, Andrews DQ, Park JK, et al. A deletion-insertion mutation in the phosphomannomutase 2 gene in an African American patient with congenital disorders of glycosylation-Ia. Am J Med Genet. 2002;108:241–246. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.10246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Tham E, Eklund EA, Hammarsjö A, et al. A novel phenotype in N-glycosylation disorders: Gillessen-Kaesbach-Nishimura skeletal dysplasia due to pathogenic variants in ALG9. Eur J Hum Genet EJHG. 2016;24:198–207. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Thompson DA, Lyons RJ, Russell-Eggitt I, et al. Retinal characteristics of the congenital disorder of glycosylation PMM2-CDG. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2013;36:1039–1047. doi: 10.1007/s10545-013-9594-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Thong MK, Fietz M, Nicholls C, et al. Congenital disorder of glycosylation type Ia in a Malaysian family: clinical outcome and description of a novel PMM2 mutation. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2009;32(Suppl 1):S41–44. doi: 10.1007/s10545-009-1031-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Truin G, Guillard M, Lefeber DJ, et al. Pericardial and abdominal fluid accumulation in congenital disorder of glycosylation type Ia. Mol Genet Metab. 2008;94:481–484. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2008.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Vabres P, Sevin C, Amoric JC, et al. Skin manifestations of protein glycosylation deficiency, the CDG (carbohydrate deficient glycoprotein) type 1 syndrome. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1998;125:715–716. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. van de Kamp JM, Lefeber DJ, Ruijter GJG, et al. Congenital disorder of glycosylation type Ia presenting with hydrops fetalis. J Med Genet. 2007;44:277–280. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2006.044735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Veneselli E, Biancheri R, Di Rocco M, Tortorelli S. Neurophysiological findings in a case of carbohydrate-deficient glycoprotein (CDG) syndrome type I with phosphomannomutase deficiency. Eur J Paediatr Neurol EJPN Off J Eur Paediatr Neurol Soc. 1998;2:239–244. doi: 10.1016/s1090-3798(98)80037-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Vermeer S, Kremer HPH, Leijten QH, et al. Cerebellar ataxia and congenital disorder of glycosylation Ia (CDG-Ia) with normal routine CDG screening. J Neurol. 2007;254:1356–1358. doi: 10.1007/s00415-007-0546-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Vleugels W, Haeuptle MA, Ng BG, et al. RFT1 deficiency in three novel CDG patients. Hum Mutat. 2009a;30:1428–1434. doi: 10.1002/humu.21085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Vleugels W, Keldermans L, Jaeken J, et al. Quality control of glycoproteins bearing truncated glycans in an ALG9-defective (CDG-IL) patient. Glycobiology. 2009b;19(8):910–7. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwp067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Wolthuis DFGJ, van Asbeck EV, Kozicz T, Morava E. Abnormal fat distribution in PMM2-CDG. Mol Genet Metab. 2013;110:411–413. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Wu X, Rush JS, Karaoglu D, et al. Deficiency of UDP-GlcNAc:Dolichol Phosphate N-Acetylglucosamine-1 Phosphate Transferase (DPAGT1) causes a novel congenital disorder of Glycosylation Type Ij. Hum Mutat. 2003;22:144–150. doi: 10.1002/humu.10239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

10545_2018_156_MOESM1_ESM

RESOURCES