Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2018 May 3;69(11):2823–2835. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery170

Ascorbate-mediated regulation of growth, photoprotection, and photoinhibition in Arabidopsis thaliana

William Plumb 1, Alexandra J Townsend 2, Brwa Rasool 1,3, Sarah Alomrani 1, Nurhayati Razak 1, Barbara Karpinska 1, Alexander V Ruban 2, Christine H Foyer 1,
PMCID: PMC5961140  PMID: 29726917

Analysis of synthesis mutants demonstrates an ascorbate requirement for growth under low light and for high light-dependent anthocyanin accumulation, but no consistent effects on photoinhibition or zeaxanthin accumulation were found.

Keywords: Anthocyanin, antioxidants, NPQ, oxidation, photoinhibition, photosynthesis, ro-GFP, zeaxanthin

Abstract

The requirements for ascorbate for growth and photosynthesis were assessed under low (LL; 250 µmol m–2 s–1) or high (HL; 1600 µmol m–2 s–1) irradiance in wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana and two ascorbate synthesis mutants (vtc2-1 and vtc2-4) that have 30% wild-type ascorbate levels. The low ascorbate mutants had the same numbers of leaves but lower rosette area and biomass than the wild type under LL. Wild-type plants experiencing HL had higher leaf ascorbate, anthocyanin, and xanthophyll pigments than under LL. In contrast, leaf ascorbate levels were not increased under HL in the mutant lines. While the degree of oxidation measured using an in vivo redox reporter in the nuclei and cytosol of the leaf epidermal and stomatal cells was similar under both irradiances in all lines, anthocyanin levels were significantly lower in the low ascorbate mutants than in the wild type under HL. Differences in the photosynthetic responses of vtc2-1 and vtc2-4 mutants were observed. Unlike vtc2-1, the vtc2-4 mutants had wild-type zeaxanthin contents. While both low ascorbate mutants had lower levels of non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll a fluorescence (NPQ) than the wild type under HL, qPd values were greater only in vtc2-1 leaves. Ascorbate is therefore essential for growth but not for photoprotection.

Introduction

The low molecular weight antioxidant ascorbate (vitamin C) is considered to fulfil a number of important functions in plants (Smirnoff, 2000; Foyer and Noctor, 2000, 2009; Gallie, 2013). Although different pathways of ascorbate synthesis have been described in higher plants, the l-galactose pathway (also known as the Wheeler–Smirnoff pathway) is the major pathway operating in Arabidopsis leaves (Wheeler et al., 1998). The rate-limiting step in this pathway is the conversion of GDP-l-galactose to l-galactose-1-phosphate which is catalysed by the enzyme GDP-l-galactose phosphorylase. This enzyme, which catalyses the first ascorbate-specific step in the pathway, is encoded by two paralogous genes, VTC2 and VTC5. The pathway of ascorbate synthesis is regulated by light (Yabuta et al., 2007). Sun-exposed leaves accumulate substantially more ascorbate than shade leaves (Smirnoff and Pallanca, 1996). Moreover, leaf ascorbate accumulation shows diurnal variations (Dutilleul et al., 2003; Pignocchi et al., 2003; Tamaoki et al., 2003; Tedone et al., 2004), with the quantity and quality of light experienced during the photoperiod modulating the extent of ascorbate accumulation (Bartoli et al., 2009). Relatively few factors that are involved in the regulation of ascorbate synthesis have been identified to date. Of these, ascorbic acid mannose pathway regulator (AMR) 1 regulates the expression of genes involved in ascorbate synthesis in response to developmental and environmental cues (Zhang et al., 2009). Ethylene response factor (ERF) 98 is a positive regulator of ascorbate synthesis pathway genes (Zhang et al., 2012). Transgenic plants overexpressing AtERF98 showed enhanced expression of ascorbate synthesis genes, while the knockout aterf98-1 mutants showed a lower capacity for ascorbate synthesis in the absence or presence of salt stress (Zhang et al., 2012). The COP9 signalosome (CSN) is a photomorphogenic complex that functions in the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway through regulation of E3 ligase activity, and is involved in the degradation of ascorbate biosynthetic enzymes in the dark (Wang et al., 2013).

Ascorbate fulfils a number of diverse roles in the regulation of photosynthesis, particularly in the acclimation of plants to high light (Müller-Moulé et al., 2003, 2014; Karpinska et al., 2017a). First, ascorbate is an important component in the water–water cycle, which protects against photoinhibition. In this process, the Mehler reaction provides an alternative electron sink generating superoxide anion radicals, O2·, that are dismutated to hydrogen peroxide by the action of the thylakoid copper/zinc superoxide dismutase. Hydrogen peroxide is then reduced to water by ascorbate peroxidases (APXs) and the chloroplast 2-Cys peroxiredoxins (PRXs; Awad et al., 2015). The water–water cycle not only scavenges superoxide and hydrogen peroxide, but it also functions to dissipate excess excitation energy and electrons (Foyer et al., 1991; Asada, 2000). The importance of the water–water cycle as an electron sink (Osmond and Grace, 1995) should be viewed, however, in terms of its contribution to thylakoid acidification and the control of PSII activity (Heber, 2002). Secondly, ascorbate is a potent specific inhibitor of 2CPA expression (Horling et al., 2003; Baier et al., 2004), influencing chloroplast to nucleus signalling pathways via the redox-sensitive transcription factor Rap2.4a (Shaikhali et al., 2008). Thirdly, ascorbate is able to donate as well as accept electrons from the photosynthetic electron transport chain acting as an alternative electron donor for PSII (Mano et al., 2004; Tóth et al., 2009).

Fourthly, ascorbate is required for the regeneration of lipid-soluble antioxidants, particularly the tocopherols and tocotrienols (vitamin E), which protect the polyunsaturated fatty acids in the thylakoid membranes from singlet oxygen. During oxidation, tocopherols become oxidized to chromanoxyl radicals, which can be converted back to vitamin E by the reducing power of ascorbate or by reaction with carotenoids. Finally, ascorbate is required for the conversion of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin in the light-dependent xanthophyll cycle, which participates in the thermal dissipation of energy under high light (Bratt et al., 1995; Müller-Moulé et al., 2003; Jahns et al., 2009). Knockout mutants of the chloroplast envelope ascorbate transporter AtPHT4;4 were shown to be compromised in thermal energy dissipation (Miyaji et al., 2015).

The vtc2-1 mutant carries a single base substitution (G to A) in the predicted 3' splice site of the fifth intron of the VTC2 gene, resulting in a 90% reduction in transcript levels compared with the wild type (Dowdle et al., 2007). Previous studies have shown that in Arabidopsis thaliana, the vtc2-1 mutants grow well under HL but acclimation of photosynthesis is impaired compared with the wild-type plants in terms of Fv/Fm, Pmax, and ϕPSII (Müller-Moulé et al., 2014). While such findings confirm that ascorbate has a protective effect on the photosynthetic processes, the precise mechanisms involved remain poorly characterized. Similarly, only one mutation in the VTC2 gene (vtc2-1) has previously been characterized in relation to the regulation of photosynthesis, and a degree of caution must be exercised in the interpretation of data arising from the analysis of single mutants (Lim et al., 2016). The following experiments were therefore conducted to determine the influence of low ascorbate on photoprotection and photoinhibition in two ascorbate synthesis mutants (vtc2-1 and vtc2-4) with defects in the VTC2 gene. The vtc2-1 and vtc2-4 mutants have a different shoot growth phenotype when grown under continuous light conditions although they have the same low level of leaf ascorbate compared with the wild type (de Simone et al., 2015; Lim et al., 2016). Unlike vtc2-1, vtc2-4 is a T-DNA insertion mutant with a complete loss of function. However, the VTC5 gene still provides sufficient residual GDP-l-galactose phosphorylase activity in the vtc2-4 mutants to allow a reduced level of ascorbate synthesis and accumulation.

Light-induced decreases in photosynthetic capacity are often reflected by permanent damage (photodamage) and resultant closure of PSII reaction centres (RCIIs) (Powles, 1984). Assessment of the different components and pathways contributing to the photoprotection of the photosynthetic membrane has been difficult due to the lack of consensus of the molecular mechanisms involved, the presence of multiple pathways occurring over different time scales, and the difficulty in accurately measuring and quantifying them (Aro et al., 1993; Jahns and Holzwarth, 2012; Ruban and Murchie 2012; Tyystjärvi, 2013). For example, measurements have previously focused on disruptive light treatments or invasive techniques (i.e. western blots) in order to estimate and evaluate photodamage (Greenberg et al., 1987; Tyystjärvi and Aro, 1996). An improved, relatively rapid, and non-destructive protocol was therefore developed to measure photochemical quenching of chlorophyll a fluorescence (NPQ), which can provide information of the effectiveness of protective processes in the photosynthetic membrane (Ruban and Murchie, 2012). The method involves using pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) fluorometry to impose a gradually increasing actinic light routine to track the yield of chlorophyll fluorescence and infer the onset of photoinactivation (often leading to photodamage) in vivo (see the Materials and methods). This enables the evaluation of the role of ascorbate in providing photoprotective effectiveness to the photosynthetic processes in the thylakoid membranes. The data presented here demonstrate that the low leaf ascorbate in the vtc2-1 and vtc2-4 mutants led to a slow growth phenotype in plants grown under short-day (8 h day/16 h night) low-light (LL; 250 µmol m–2) conditions. Similarly, anthocyanin accumulation was restricted by low ascorbate in both mutant lines under high-light (HL) growth conditions. Only the vtc2-1 mutant and not the vtc2-4 mutants accumulated less zeaxanthin under HL. Moreover, the level of HL-induced photodamage was not significantly higher in either of the low ascorbate mutants compared with the wild type.

Materials and methods

Plant material and growth conditions

Seeds of A. thaliana ([L.] Heynh.) wild-type ecotype Columbia-0 (Col-0) and vtc2-4 (SAIL_769_H05) (Lim et al., 2016) were obtained from the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre (NASC). Seeds of the vtc2-1 mutant (Conklin et al., 2000) were obtained from Dr Robert Last (USA). Seeds of transgenic A. thaliana (L.) that constitutively express redox-sensitive green fluorescent protein2 (roGFP2) and vtc2-1roGFP2 were as described in de Simone et al. (2017)

Unless otherwise stated, plants were grown in compost in controlled-environment chambers at constant relative humidity (60%) and temperature (20 oC) under an 8 h day/16 h night. Plants were grown for the time specified in the figure legends under LL (250 µmol m–2 s–1), after which half of the plants were transferred to HL (1600 µmol m–2 s–1) for a further 7 d while the other half were maintained under LL conditions. Illumination in the controlled-environment chambers was provided by Attis-7 LED lights (Plessey, Plymouth, UK).

Shoot phenotype

Ten independent plants per genotype and growth irradiance were measured at the end of the photoperiod at the times indicated in the figure legends. Rosette diameters were measured with a ruler and the numbers of leaves per rosette were counted. Leaf area was calculated from digital images of the rosettes. In younger rosettes, this measurement accurately measures leaf area but it is less accurate in older rosettes due to some overlap of leaves. The rosettes were then photographed using a Canon EOS 450D digital camera mounted at a set height above the pots. The digital images captured were used to estimate the number of fully expanded leaves, and rosette areas were estimated using the Image J program version 1.41a scaled to a ruler placed alongside each image.

Pigment analysis

Photosynthetic pigments were estimated in the youngest fully expanded leaves harvested from three independent 4-week-old plants per genotype per time point. Leaves were weighed and ground in liquid nitrogen, and ice-cold 95% ethanol was added at a ratio of 10 ml g–1 leaf FW. Extracts were centrifuged for 10 min at 14 000 g (4 °C) and the supernatant fractions were used for pigment determination. Chlorophyll and carotenoids were measured by spectrophotometry according to the method of Lichtenthaler (1986). Xanthophyll pool sizes and the de-epoxidation state (zeaxanthin+0.5×antheraxanthin)/(violaxanthin+antheraxanthin+zeaxanthin) were determined by reversed-phase HPLC using a LiChrospher 100 RP-18 column (Merck) and a Dionex Summit chromatography system as previously described (Ruban et al., 1998). Anthocyanins were extracted and assayed as described by Neff and Chory (1998).

Whole-leaf ascorbate and dehydroascorbate

Whole-leaf samples from three independent plants per genotype per time point (as indicated in the figures) were harvested, weighed, and immediately ground in liquid nitrogen under the prevailing dark/light conditions in the controlled-environment chambers. Ascorbate and dehydroascorbate (DHA) were extracted from the frozen pellets by grinding again in 1 M HClO4 at a ratio of 10 ml g–1 FW and assayed as described by Queval and Noctor (2007). Leaf ascorbate and DHA were calculated as described by Noctor et al. (2016).

Fluorescence measurements

The protective effectiveness of processes occurring in the photosynthetic membrane was assessed using the NPQ method (Ruban and Murchie, 2012), which entails a gradually increasing actinic light routine to track the relationship between yield (ϕPSII), NPQ, and qPd (the quantum coefficient of photochemical quenching measured in the dark following light exposure (Fig. 6). ϕPSII was undermined by NPQ and the photoinactivation of RCII according to Equation 1.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

The effect of 7 d growth high light (HL; 1600 µmol m–2 s–1) on the levels of anthocyanin pigments in the leaves of the vtc2-1 and vtc2-4 mutants compared with the wild type. Plants were grown under low light (LL; 250 μmol m–2 s–1) conditions for 5 weeks and then either grown for a further 7 d under LL conditions prior to measurement or transferred to HL growth conditions for a further 7 d. * indicates significantly different results according to ANOVA, P<0.05. Error bars represent the SE (n=9).

ϕPSII=qPd.FvFm[1+(1FvFm).NPQ] 1

where Fv/Fm is the maximum photochemical quantum yield of PSII, calculated as [FmFo]/Fm, and Fm and Fo are the maximum and minimum yields of fluorescence, respectively. NPQ is calculated as (FmFm')–1. The qPd parameter is a measure of the coefficient of photochemistry in the dark, is calculated according to Equation 2:

qPd=(Fm'Fo'act)(Fm'Fo'calc) 2

where Fo'act and Fo'calc are the actual and calculated minimum levels of fluorescence in the dark following actinic light (AL) illumination. Fo'calc is quantified according to Equation 3:

Fo'calc=11Fo1Fm +1Fm' 3

Procedures

pNPQ (protective NPQ) measurements on whole intact leaves were performed using a JUNIOR-PAM fluorimeter (Walz, Effeltrich, Germany) and a magnetic leaf clip. Plants were dark adapted for 45 min before each procedure. The procedure used AL intensities of 150, 317, 475, 700, 1042, 1367, 1917, and 2500 µmol photons m–2 s–1. Each AL increment lasts for 5 min, before a saturating pulse (SP) is applied in the light to measure the NPQ. The AL is then turned off for 10 s but with far-red (FR) light on, before another SP is applied to measure the photochemical quenching in the dark (qPd). After this SP, the AL is turned on for another 5 min at the next AL intensity. The procedure was run as a pre-programmed batch file with the scheme: (SP)-(AL on)-(120 s)-(SP)-(180 s)-(SP)-(AL off/FR on)-(7 s)-(SP)-(5 s)-(AL on/FR off)-repeat. Under low light intensities, the Fo'calc matches Fo'act; however, under high light intensities, the two Fo' values diverge. This is due to the rise in minimum fluorescence caused by the closure of RCII. This causes Fo'calc<Fo'act and qPd<1.00, and at this point the leaf is considered to be photodamaged. A qPd value of 1.00 represents 100% open reaction centres (RCs). However, to account for the natural variations in qPd, values <0.98 were selected as a mark of photodamage (i.e. >2% of RCIIs are damaged), with damage being relatively proportional to the decline in qPd (Ware et al., 2015). When qPd>0.98, NPQ is considered to be protective and is thus called pNPQ. For a detailed description of the principles of the method, see Ruban and Murchie (2012). The pNPQ measurements were taken before, during, and after the light treatment. Five replicates were taken per line at three different time points during the experiment: prior to light treatment, following 7d of light treatment, and 24 h after plants were returned to the lower light intensity, hereby referred to as before treatment, during treatment, and the recovery stage.

roGFP measurements

Batches of roGFP2 and vtc2-1roGFP2 seedlings were grown for 7 d on vertical agar plates containing half-strength Murashige and Skoog medium with 0.1 g l–1 myoinositol, 10 g l–1 sucrose, and 0.5 g l–1 MES buffer (pH 5.7) as described previously (Kerchev et al., 2011). Seedlings were grown either under LL (250 µmol m–2 s–1) for 7 d or under LL for 6 d followed by HL (1600 µmol m–2 s–1) for 24 h. For confocal microscopy, seedlings were placed on a slide in a drop of sterile water. Fluorescence imaging was performed using a Carl Zeiss confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss LSM880, Jena, Germany). The microscope was equipped with 405 nm and 488 nm lasers for detection of the oxidized and reduced forms of ro-GFP2, respectively. Images were taken with a ×40/1.3 Oil DIC M27 lens (Zeiss Objective C-Apochromat ×40/1.2 W Corr M27) in multitrack mode with line switching between 488 nm and 405 nm excitation. Ratiometric analyses were performed using ImageJ software (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/). The range of the roGFP2 signal was calibrated at the end of each experiment using 2.5 mM DTT (reduced) or 2 mM hydrogen peroxide (oxidized). The oxidation degree and glutathione redox potential values were calculated as described in de Simone et al. (2017). Each experiment involved 50 seeds per line and was repeated three times.

Statistics

ANOVA was carried out on all parameters at each growth stage using GenStat for Windows, 17th Edition (VSN International Ltd). Data were checked to see if they met the assumption of constant variance and normal distribution of residuals.

Results

Growth phenotypes of wild-type, vtc2-1, and vtc2-4 plants grown under low light

The rosettes of the vtc2-1 and vtc2-4 mutants were visibly smaller than those of the wild type when grown under LL (250 µmol m–2 s–1) conditions, particularly at the later stages of development (Fig. 1). Although the vtc2-1 and vtc2-4 mutants had a smaller rosette diameter (Fig. 2A), with a smaller total leaf area (Fig. 2C) and leaf biomass (Fig. 2C), they had the same number of leaves as the wild type at equivalent stages of development (Fig. 2B). Moreover, there were no visually detectable differences in rosette morphology (petiole length and leaf angle) between the lines.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

A comparison of the rosette phenotypes of wild-type (WT) A. thaliana, and the vtc2-1 and vtc2-4 mutants grown under low light (LL) conditions. Plants were grown for up to 9 weeks under LL (250 μmol m–2 s–1) conditions.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Rosette phenotypes of wild-type (WT), vtc2-1, and vtc2-4 A. thaliana genotypes grown under low light (250 μmol m–2 s–1) conditions for 7 weeks. (A) Rosette diameter. (B) Number of leaves. (C) Leaf (rosette) area. (D) Biomass (fresh weight). Error bars represent the SE (n=10). * indicates significantly different results according to ANOVA, P<0.05.

Leaf chlorophyll and total carotenoid contents in wild-type, vtc2-1, and vtc2-4 plants

The vtc2-1 and vtc2-4 mutants had similar amounts of leaf chlorophyll (Fig. 3A) and carotenoid pigments (Fig. 3B) to the wild type when grown under LL conditions. The vtc2-4 and vtc2-1 leaves has similar levels of leaf ascorbate, the ascorbate levels of both mutants being significantly lower than that of the wild type at all stages of leaf development (Figs 3C, 4). The ratio of reduced to oxidized ascorbate was similar in all genotypes under LL growth conditions at all the stages of rosette development measured (Fig. 3C).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Developmental profiles of leaf pigments and ascorbate contents in wild-type (WT), vtc2-1, and vtc2-4 A. thaliana rosettes. Plants were grown under low light (250 μmol m–2 s–1) conditions for 9 weeks. (A) Chlorophyll. (B) Carotenoid pigments. (C) Ascorbate; reduced ascorbate (open bars), dehydroascorbate (striped bars). Error bars represent the SE (n=9). * indicates significantly different results according to ANOVA, P<0.05.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

The pigment composition of the vtc2-1 and vtc2-4 leaves compared with the wild type (WT). Plants were grown under low light (LL; 250 μmol m-2 s-1) conditions for 5 weeks and then either for a further 7 d under LL conditions or after transfer to high light (HL; 1600 μmol m–2 s–1) growth conditions for 7 d. Leaves were harvested from plants grown only under LL, after 7 d growth under HL, and after ‘recovery’ (2 d after return to the LL growth environment after 7 d under HL). De-epoxidation state (DEPs)=(Z+0.5A)/(V+A+Z); XC: xanthophyll pool (Z+A+V)/(Z+A+V+N+L+β-car) where Z, zeaxanthin; V, violaxanthin; A, antheraxanthin; N, neoxanthin; L, lutein; β-car, β-carotene. Data are presented as means ± SEM from five replicates. * indicates significantly different results during each experimental time point according to ANOVA, P<0.05.

The effect of low ascorbate on HL-dependent changes in leaf carotenoid pigment composition

The low ascorbate mutants showed differences in pigment composition compared with the wild-type (Fig. 4). However, there were few consistent differences between the vtc2-1 and vtc2-4 leaves relative to the wild type. Both low ascorbate mutants had significantly higher Chl a/b ratios (Fig. 4A) and lower chlorophyll to carotenoid ratios (Fig. 4B) than the wild type in the recovery phase at LL after growth under HL conditions. The xanthophyll pool size was lower in the vtc2-1 mutant than in the wild type but higher in vtc2-4 under HL and in the recovery phase at LL after growth under HL conditions (Fig. 4C). Moreover, the vtc2-1 leaves had lower zeaxanthin levels, expressed as the de-epoxidation state of the xanthophyll pool, than the wild type or vtc2-4 mutants under HL (Fig. 4D). Leaf zeaxanthin contents expressed as a percentage of the total carotenoid were greatly increased in the wild type and vtc2-4 mutants under HL compared with LL or in the recovery period (Fig. 4D). In contrast, the vtc2-1 leaves accumulated less zeaxanthin than the wild type or the vtc2-4 mutant under HL (Fig. 4D).

Effects of high light on leaf ascorbate levels

The levels of ascorbate in the leaves of the wild-type plants were significantly increased by growth under HL compared with LL conditions (Fig. 5). The level of DHA also increased under HL compared with LL conditions. The levels of leaf ascorbate in the wild-type plants were decreased 48 h after return to the LL conditions. In contrast to the wild type, the leaves of the vtc2-1 and vtc2-4 mutants were not changed by HL light growth conditions, remaining at the same levels as plants grown under LL (Fig. 5). The levels of anthocyanins were below the levels of detection in the leaves of all genotypes grown under LL conditions (data not shown). After 7 d of growth under HL, the levels of anthocyanin pigments were much lower in the vtc2-1 and vtc2-4 leaves than in those of the wild type (Fig. 6).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

The effect of 7 d growth under high light (HL; 1600 µmol m–2 s–1) on the ascorbate levels in the leaves of the vtc2-1 and vtc2-4 mutants compared with the wild type. Plants were grown under low light (LL; 250 μmol m–2 s–1) conditions for 5 weeks and then batches of plants were either grown for a further 7 d under LL conditions prior to measurement or transferred to HL growth conditions for a further 7 d. Thereafter, some batches of HL-grown plants were returned to LL growth conditions for 2 d prior to measurement of reduced ascorbate and dehydroascorbate. Error bars represent the SE (n=9). * indicates significantly different results according to ANOVA, P<0.05.

Effects of low ascorbate on NPQ and photodamage in wild-type, vtc2-1, and vtc2-4 plants

Photodamage was quantified by the divergence in Fo'act and Fo'calc, and the corresponding decline in the qPd parameter, as illustrated in Fig. 7. A qPd value of 1.00 represents 100% open RCs. Values <0.98 are considered to reflect photodamage (i.e. >2% of RCIIs are damaged). The loss of RC functions is proportional to the decline in qPd (Ware et al., 2015). The mutant and the wild-type leaves had similar qPd values under LL and hence similar low levels of photodamage (Fig. 8A). Only the vtc2-1 mutant showed a significant decrease in qPd relative to the wild type (P<0.05) under the HL treatment. The data from both mutants have to be assessed together to determine the impact of ascorbate on photodamage. The vtc2-4 plants had similar qPd values to the wild type under HL and hence had similar levels of photodamage (Fig. 8A). During the recovery phase, whilst the qPd appears to be lower in vtc2-1 relative to the other lines, this difference is not significant.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Scheme of induction of chlorophyll fluorescence from a WT Col-0 plant with an eight step actinic light (AL) routine. Inset: the gradually increasing AL routine induces photodamage which can be readily observed as a divergence between Fo'act and Fo'calc, and be seen as a decrease in the qPd parameter.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

The photochemical quenching in the dark (qPd) and maximum NPQ values in the leaves of the vtc2-1 and vtc2-4 mutants compared with the wild type. Plants were grown under low light (LL; 250 μmol m–2 s–1) conditions for 5 weeks and then either grown for a further 7 d under LL conditions prior to measurement or transferred to high light (HL; 1600 μmol m–2 s–1) growth conditions for a further 7 d. A. The average qPd value at the end of the fluorescence routine presented in Fig. 6 taken before and during high light treatment and in the recovery phase. (B) The maximum NPQ value at the end of the fluorescence routine. Error bars represent the SE (n=5). * indicates significantly different results according to ANOVA, P<0.05.

The vtc2-1 leaves exhibited significantly lower maximum NPQ values under LL than the wild type or the vtc2-4 mutants under LL (Fig. 8B). The leaves of the wild type had higher NPQ values than those of the vtc2-1 and vtc2-4 mutants under HL conditions and during recovery from HL (Fig. 7B), maximum NPQ being generally lower under HL than LL growth conditions (Fig. 8B). During the recovery phase, the NPQ values were significantly higher in the wild type than in the vtc2-1 and vtc2-4 mutants.

Effects of low ascorbate on the oxidation state of the nuclei and cytosol of stomatal and epidermal cells under LL and HL conditions

The in vivo redox state of the leaf cells was measured using roGFP (Fig. 9). The 405/488 nm fluorescence ratios (Fig. 10A, B), which provide a quantitative assessment in leaf epidermal and stomatal cells, were compared in wild-type seedlings expressing roGFP, the vtc2-1 mutants expressing roGFP (vtc2-1roGFP), and vtc2-4 mutants expressing roGFP (vtc2-4roGFP). The degree of oxidation was similar in the nuclei and cytosol of the leaf epidermal and stomatal cells in all the lines under LL conditions (Fig. 10C). Moreover, growth under HL had no significant effect on the degree of oxidation (or the glutathione redox potentials; data not shown) of the nuclei and cytosol of the leaf epidermal or stomatal cells in any of the lines (Fig. 10D).

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9.

Overlaid images of the reduced and oxidized forms of ro-GFP2 fluorescence images of the cotyledons of A. thaliana wild-type seedlings expressing roGFP (A, C) and vtc2-1 mutants expressing roGFP (vtc2-1roGFP; B, D). Seedlings had been grown on plates either under low light for 7 d (A, B) or under low light for 7 d followed by high light for 24 h (C, D). Scale bar=20 µm.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10.

The 405/488 nm fluorescence ratios (A, B) and the degree of oxidation (C, D) measured in the cytosol (dark bar) and in the nuclei (grey bar) of the stomatal and epidermal cells of A. thaliana wild-type seedlings expressing roGFP, the vtc2-1 mutants expressing roGFP (vtc2-1roGFP), and the vtc2-4 mutants expressing (vtc2-4roGFP). Seedlings had been grown on plates either under low light for 7 d (A, C) or under low light for 7 d followed by high light for 24 h (B, D).

Discussion

In previous studies, we have reported that the low ascorbate mutants vtc-1 and vtc2-1 are smaller than the wild type under short photoperiod growth conditions (Pastori et al., 2003; Kerchev et al., 2011) and we have shown that the lower rosette biomass accumulation was related to a smaller cell size in the mature leaves (Pavet et al., 2005). However, the validity of using single mutations in each gene was recently questioned, and the decreased growth phenotype observed in vtc2-1 was suggested to be due to an independent cryptic mutation and is not due to ascorbate deficiency (Lim et al., 2016). In order to reconcile the issue of the role of ascorbate in the regulation of leaf size and biomass accumulation, we compared the shoot phenotypes of two ascorbate synthesis mutants (vtc2-1 and vtc2-4) and the wild type under short-day growth conditions. Both low ascorbate mutants had a significantly smaller leaf size and rosette biomass accumulation than the wild type under the short-day growth conditions used in these studies (Figs 1, 2). However, this phenotype is clearly dependent on day length because the phenotype is less marked when plants are grown under LDs or constant light conditions (de Simone et al., 2015; Lim et al., 2016). Moreover, the suggestion that independent cryptic mutations in vtc2-1 may be responsible for some of the traits that had previously been reported, we focused our efforts on a re-analysis of the role of ascorbate in photosynthesis by comparing pigment composition, NPQ, and photodamage in the leaves of vtc2-1 and vtc2-4 mutants relative to those of the wild type in plants grown under LL and HL conditions.

Photosynthesis and associated metabolism adjust rapidly to changes in light intensity (Cohu et al., 2014; Demmig-Adams et al., 2014). Following transitions from darkness or LL to HL, a period of photosynthetic activation is required that involves imbalances in both energy and redox status (Foyer et al., 1992, 2017, Foyer and Noctor, 2000, 2009). It had long been considered that the photosynthetic apparatus can respond quickly to changes in irradiance in order to harvest light efficiently under LL while avoiding photo-damage under HL. However, recent evidence suggests that this is not the case and that leaves adjust photosynthetic efficiency in response to changing irradiance relatively slowly. Hence, decreasing the time required for NPQ relaxation was shown to increase the efficiency of CO2 assimilation in tobacco leaves to such an extent that productivity was increased by up to 20% (Kromdijk et al., 2016). Moreover, wheat leaves were shown to take 15 min to regain maximum photosynthetic efficiency following transfer from shade to sun conditions, a major limitation being the time required to activate Rubisco (Taylor and Long, 2017). The adjustments required to accommodate transitions to HL were predicted to limit the productivity of the wheat crop by ~21% (Taylor and Long, 2017). We have recently shown that pre-illumination of the tomato shoot apex alone can accelerate photosynthetic induction in distal leaves (Guo et al., 2016). This systemic induction of photosynthesis involves a phytochrome B-mediated auxin pathway that leads to H2O2 production in the systemic leaves accompanied by increased cyclic electron flow around PSI, allowing better adaptation to a changing light environment (Guo et al., 2016). Similarly, altering the apoplastic ascorbate/DHA ratios by manipulating ascorbate oxidase activities was sufficient to alter the ability of photosynthesis to acclimate to high light (Karpinska et al., 2017a). Tobacco leaves with low ascorbate oxidase activities and hence more ascorbate in the apoplast were able to maintain higher photosynthesis rates under HL than wild-type plants or plants with high ascorbate oxidase activities (Karpinska et al., 2017a). Taken together, such findings demonstrate that light acclimation is responsive to local and systemic cues, as well as processes directly in the chloroplasts exposed to changing irradiance. The data presented here show that although Arabidopsis leaves under HL accumulate much higher levels of ascorbate than under LL, the process of acclimation to HL in the thylakoid membrane does not require high levels of leaf ascorbate. Moreover, low ascorbate does not lead to increased oxidation of the cytosol or nuclei, as measured in vivo using a redox-sensitive GFP probe, even under HL conditions. These observations show that ascorbate deficiency alone does not lead to chronic oxidation of leaf cells. The leaves of the vtc2-1 and vtc2-4 mutants had significantly lower levels of leaf ascorbate than those of the wild type under LL and HL conditions (Fig. 5). We have previously shown that like the wild type, the levels of leaf ascorbate increase significantly when these mutants are grown under continuous light (de Simone et al., 2015). However, the leaves of both mutant genotypes still have only ~50% of the wild-type ascorbate even under continuous light growth conditions (de Simone et al., 2015).

Under HL, leaves require less chlorophyll to maintain high photosynthesis rates than under LL, but such adjustments are very slow, taking several days (Yin and Johnson 2000; Karpinska et al., 2017a). The leaves of the wild-type Arabidopsis plants in the present study had significantly lower levels of chlorophyll but much higher ascorbate contents after 7 d growth under HL compared with those grown under the LL regime. The increase in leaf ascorbate levels under high light is consistent with literature evidence showing the effect of light on ascorbate synthesis and accumulation (Bartoli et al., 2006, 2009). Crucially, the data presented here demonstrate that the HL-dependent increases in leaf ascorbate were absent from the vtc2-1 and vtc2-4 mutants, illustrating the importance of GDP-l-galactose phosphorylase in light regulation of the ascorbate synthesis pathway. We have recently shown that tobacco leaves retained very high levels of ascorbate over the whole of the first photoperiod followinbg transfer to a LL environment after a period of growth under HL (Karpinska et al., 2017a). Hence, ascorbate synthesis and accumulation are slow to acclimate to a changing light environment, even though the levels of transcripts encoding biosynthetic enzymes were significantly lower following the transition from HL to LL (Karpinska et al., 2017a). The data presented here for the wild-type plants, which retained much higher levels of ascorbate in their leaves 2 d after the transition from HL to LL growth conditions (Fig. 5), support this conclusion.

The data presented here show that the low levels of leaf ascorbate in the vtc2-1 and vtc2-4 leaves led to a significant decrease in leaf anthocyanin contents. This finding is consistent with literature evidence showing that ascorbate is an important regulator of anthocyanin synthesis (Bashandy et al., 2009; Page et al., 2012). Ascorbate regulates the expression of genes involved in flavonol and anthocyanin precursor synthesis (Vanderauwera et al., 2005; Page et al., 2012) such as PHENYLALANINE AMMONIA-LYASE1 (PAL1), 4-COUMARATE:COENZYME A LIGASE3, CHALCONE SYNTHASE (CHS), as well as the MYB transcription factor PAP1 and an ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL5 (HY5) homologue HYH (Munné-Bosch et al., 2013). The anthocyanin synthesis pathway was also suppressed in double mutants lacking the two plastid 2-Cys PRXs (2cpa 2cpb; Munné-Bosch et al., 2013). However, the impaired capacity to accumulate anthocyanin observed in the leaves of the vtc2-1 and vtc2-4 mutants had no detectable effect on the effectiveness of the photo-protective processes measured within the leaves under LL conditions (Fig. 7).

Previous studies concerning the effects of low ascorbate on photosynthesis using vtc2-1 mutants (e.g. Müller-Moulé et al., 2003) have reported that a sudden exposure to high irradiance caused photoinhibition and photooxidation compared with the wild type. Moreover, long-term acclimation of vtc2-1 to HL was accompanied by a noticeable inhibition of photosynthesis (Müller-Moulé et al., 2003). The data presented here confirm these observations but reveal some important differences in the responses of vtc2-1 and vtc2-4 mutants to HL (Figs 4, 8). In particular, the vtc2-1 had significantly lower qPD values than the vtc2-4 mutants under HL. Moreover, the HL-dependent changes in leaf pigment content and composition were different in the vtc2-1 and vtc2-4 leaves, even though both mutants have the same low level of ascorbate relative to the wild type. The HL-dependent changes in qPD values and in leaf pigment content and composition were similar in the vtc2-4 and wild-type leaves. This finding suggests that the vtc2-1 mutant has enhanced susceptibility of photosynthesis to photoinhibition and photooxidation as previously reported (Müller-Moulé et al., 2003, 2014), but it is not caused by the low ascorbate content of the leaves. While the vtc2-1 leaves showed significantly lower qPd values under HL, indicative of a greater amount of damage, there was no consistent effect of low ascorbate on this parameter in the vtc2-1 and vtc2-4 mutants.

The leaves of the vtc2-4 mutants accumulated significantly more zeaxanthin than the wild type under HL (Fig. 10). This finding suggests that ascorbate is not the only reductant that can drive the vioxanthin de-epoxidase reaction under HL. Vioxanthin de-epoxidase has a low affinity for ascorbate and this is strongly pH dependent, the enzyme being saturated only at 10–20 mM ascorbate at pH 4.5–5.5 (Bratt et al., 1995; Jahns et al., 2009). Moreover, the enzyme requires much higher levels of ascorbate for saturation (100 mM) at pH 6.0 (Bratt et al., 1995; Jahns et al., 2009). While chloroplasts have ~10 mM ascorbate, the levels in the thylakoid lumen are much lower (Zechmann et al., 2011; Heyneke et al., 2013). Hence, vioxanthin de-epoxidase activity must always be limited by ascorbate availability in the wild type even under optimal conditions. Taken together these observations suggest that alternative reductants are available to drive the vioxanthin de-epoxidase reaction. Arabidopsis mutants lacking both the stromal (sAPX) and thylakoid (tAPX) forms of APXs show a similar sensitivity to HL stress to the wild type (Giacomelli et al., 2007; Kangasjärvi et al., 2008; Maruta et al., 2010). These APXs work together with PRXs to remove hydrogen peroxide produced by the photosynthetic electron transport chain (Awad et al., 2015). Mutants lacking the thylakoid 2-Cys PRXs (2cpa 2cpb) and a triple mutant deficient in 2-Cys PRXs and thylakoid APX (2cpa 2cpb tapx) showed much lower photosynthetic efficiencies than the wild type under HL conditions (Awad et al., 2015). As in the case of hydrogen peroxide removal, multiple reductants might support the vioxanthin de-epoxidase reaction and hence zeaxanthin formation. Moreover, low ascorbate had no marked effect on the degree of cellular oxidation (Fig. 8), confirming that other antioxidants are able to compensate for low ascorbate in the maintenance of cellular redox homeostasis as suggested previously (Müller-Moulé et al., 2014). However, ascorbate deficits influence photosynthetic gene expression (Kiddle et al., 2003) even though glutathione levels are increased to compensate for low ascorbate and maintain antioxidant capacity (Pavet et al., 2005).

The finding that the degree of oxidation in the nuclei and cytosol in the leaf epidermal and stomatal cells measured using roGFP (Meyer et al., 2007) was similar in the low ascorbate lines and the wild type both at LL and at HL is consistent with the conclusion that other antioxidants are increased to compensate for low ascorbate (Pavet et al., 2005). We have not used the next-generation glutaredoxin (GRX)-containing roGFP2 biosensor probes that were developed for the measurement of the glutathione redox potential in severely glutathione-deficient mutants (Aller et al., 2013). Hence, the effectiveness of the probe is determined by the local levels of GRX proteins. Like the cytosol, the nucleus has a number of GRX forms, including GRXC7, GRXC8, and GRXC9, which are involved in different processes such as pathogen responses and petal development through interactions with TGA transcription factors (Rouhier, 2010). Moreover, it is likely that at least some if not all of these GRX forms, such as GrxC7 (also called ROXY1), have a dual nucleo-cytoplasmic localization and partition between the two compartments. We were unable to undertake accurate roGFP measurements in leaf mesophyll cells because of interference from autofluorescence of the photosynthetic pigments, even though the roGFP2 emission peak is well separated from the chlorophyll emission peak. While the oxidation status of the cytosol and nuclei of the epidermal cells cannot be used to assess photodamage in the mesophyll cells, we have previously shown that inhibitors of chloroplast functions underpinning the efficient operation of photosynthesis, such as norflurazon (NF) and lincomycin (LINC), cause marked increases in the degree of oxidation of the nuclei and cytosol of the epidermal and stomatal guard cells (Karpinska et al., 2017b). The degree of oxidation in the nuclei and cytosol of the leaf epidermal and stomatal cells was decreased to 50% in the presence of both LINC and NF compared with less than ~10% in untreated controls (Karpinska et al., 2017b). The levels of glutathione have previously been shown to be increased in low ascorbate mutants (Pavet et al., 2005). Thus, the present finding that the degree of oxidation was similar in the nuclei and cytosol of the leaf epidermal and stomatal guard cells of all lines is consistent with previous observations indicating that cells with low ascorbate are protected from increased oxidation by increases in the levels of other antioxidants.

The data presented here not only confirm the role of ascorbate in the regulation of rosette growth but they also illustrate the importance of analysing more than one mutant in any single gene to verify relationships between traits and gene functions. While the data regarding the responses of the vtc2-1 mutants to HL are similar to those reported previously (Müller-Moulé et al., 2003, 2014), the lack of corroboration in the vtc2-4 mutant suggests that low ascorbate is not the basis for the enhanced sensitivity to photoinhibition and photooxidation reported in the vtc2-1 mutants. Moreover, the data presented here suggest that overall the ascorbate mutants are less susceptible to HL-induced photodamge than the wild type, a finding which again may illustrate the importance of functional redundancy in systems that protect the photosynthetic apparatus.

Acknowledgements

CHF thanks the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) UK (BB/M009130/1) for financial support. BR thanks the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Iraqi-Kurdistan Regional Government for funding through the HCDP programme.

Glossary

Abbreviations:

APX

ascorbate peroxidase

FR

far red light

HL

high light

LL

low light

NPQ

non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll a fluorescence

PAM

pulse amplitude modulation

PRX

peroxiredoxin

qPd

photochemical quenching in the dark

RCII

PSII reaction centre

roGFP

redox-sensitive green fluorescent protein

SP

saturating pulse.

Author contributions

CHF conceived the study; CHF and AR designed experiments; WP, AJT, BR, and NR conducted experiments; CHF and AR wrote the manuscript with input from WP.

References

  1. Aller I, Rouhier N, Meyer AJ. 2013. Development of roGFP2-derived redox probes for measurement of the glutathione redox potential in the cytosol of severely glutathione-deficient rml1 seedlings. Frontiers in Plant Science 4, 506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aro EM, Virgin I, Andersson B. 1993. Photoinhibition of photosystem II. Inactivation, protein damage and turnover. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1143, 113–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Asada K. 2000. The water–water cycle as alternative photon and electron sinks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 355, 1419–1431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Awad J, Stotz HU, Fekete A, Krischke M, Engert C, Havaux M, Berger S, Mueller MJ. 2015. 2-Cysteine peroxiredoxins and thylakoid ascorbate peroxidase create a water–water cycle that is essential to protect the photosynthetic apparatus under high light stress conditions. Plant Physiology 167, 1592–1603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baier M, Ströher E, Dietz KJ. 2004. The acceptor availability at photosystem I and ABA control nuclear expression of 2-Cys peroxiredoxin-A in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant and Cell Physiology 45, 997–1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bartoli CG, Tambussi EA, Diego F, Foyer CH. 2009. Control of ascorbic acid synthesis and accumulation and glutathione by the incident light red/far red ratio in Phaseolus vulgaris leaves. FEBS Letters 583, 118–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bartoli CG, Yu J, Gómez F, Fernández L, McIntosh L, Foyer CH. 2006. Inter-relationships between light and respiration in the control of ascorbic acid synthesis and accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. Journal of Experimental Botany 57, 1621–1631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bashandy T, Taconnat L, Renou JP, Meyer Y, Reichheld JP. 2009. Accumulation of flavonoids in an ntra ntrb mutant leads to tolerance to UV-C. Molecular Plant 2, 249–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bratt CE, Arvidsson PO, Carlsson M, Akerlund HE. 1995. Regulation of violaxanthin de-epoxidase activity by pH and ascorbate concentration. Photosynthesis Research 45, 169–175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohu CM, Muller O, Adams WW 3rd, Demmig-Adams B. 2014. Leaf anatomical and photosynthetic acclimation to cool temperature and high light in two winter versus two summer annuals. Physiologia Plantarum 152, 164–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Conklin PL, Saracco SA, Norris SR, Last RL. 2000. Identification of ascorbic acid-deficient Arabidopsis thaliana mutants. Genetics 154, 847–856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Demmig-Adams B, Stewart JJ, Adams WW. 2014. Multiple feedbacks between chloroplast and whole plant in the context of plant adaptation and acclimation to the environment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 369, 20130244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. de Simone A, Hubbard R, Viñegra de la Torre N, Velappan Y, Wilson M, Considine MJ, Soppe WJJ, Foyer CH. 2017. Redox changes during the cell cycle in the embryonic root meristem of Arabidopsis thaliana. Antioxidants and Redox Signaling 27, 1505–1509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. de Simone A, Pellny TK, Foyer CH. 2015. Accumulation of ascorbate in the leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana wildtype and vtc2 mutants under continuous light and short photoperiod conditions. Aspects of Applied Biology 124, 123–130. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dowdle J, Ishikawa T, Gatzek S, Rolinski S, Smirnoff N. 2007. Two genes in Arabidopsis thaliana encoding GDP-l-galactose phosphorylase are required for ascorbate biosynthesis and seedling viability. The Plant Journal 52, 673–689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dutilleul C, Garmier M, Noctor G, Mathieu C, Chétrit P, Foyer CH, de Paepe R. 2003. Leaf mitochondria modulate whole cell redox homeostasis, set antioxidant capacity, and determine stress resistance through altered signaling and diurnal regulation. The Plant Cell 15, 1212–1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Foyer CH, Lelandais M, Edwards EA, Mullineaux PM. 1991. The role of ascorbate in plants, interactions with photosynthesis, and regulatory significance. In: Pell E, Steffen K, eds. Active oxygen/oxidative stress and plant metabolism. St Paul, MN: American Society of Plant Physiologists, 131–144. [Google Scholar]
  18. Foyer CH, Lelandais M, Harbinson J. 1992. Control of the quantum efficiencies of photosystems I and II, electron flow, and enzyme activation following dark-to-light transitions in pea leaves: relationship between NADP/NADPH ratios and NADP-malate dehydrogenase activation state. Plant Physiology 99, 979–986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Foyer CH, Noctor G. 2000. Oxygen processing in photosynthesis: regulation and signalling. New Phytologist 146, 359–388. [Google Scholar]
  20. Foyer CH, Noctor G. 2009. Redox regulation in photosynthetic organisms: signaling, acclimation, and practical implications. Antioxidants and Redox Signaling 11, 861–905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Foyer CH, Ruban AV, Noctor G. 2017. Viewing oxidative stress through the lens of oxidative signalling rather than damage. Biochemical Journal 474, 877–883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gallie DR. 2013. The role ofl-ascorbic acid recycling in responding to environmental stress and in promoting plant growth. Journal of Experimental Botany 64, 433–443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Giacomelli L, Masi A, Ripoll DR, Lee MJ, van Wijk KJ. 2007. Arabidopsis thaliana deficient in two chloroplast ascorbate peroxidases shows accelerated light-induced necrosis when levels of cellular ascorbate are low. Plant Molecular Biology 65, 627–644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Greenberg BM, Gaba V, Mattoo AK, Edelman M. 1987. Identification of a primary in vivo degradation product of the rapidly-turning-over 32 kD protein of photosystem II. EMBO Journal 6, 2865–2869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Guo Z, Wang F, Xiang X et al. . 2016. Systemic induction of photosynthesis via illumination of the shoot apex is mediated sequentially by phytochrome B, auxin and hydrogen peroxide in tomato. Plant Physiology 172, 1259–1272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Heber U. 2002. Irrungen, Wirrungen? The Mehler reaction in relation to cyclic electron transport in C3 plants. Photosynthesis Research 73, 223–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Heyneke E, Luschin-Ebengreuth N, Krajcer I, Wolkinger V, Müller M, Zechmann B. 2013. Dynamic compartment specific changes in glutathione and ascorbate levels in Arabidopsis plants exposed to different light intensities. BMC Plant Biology 13, 104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Horling F, Lamkemeyer P, König J, Finkemeier I, Kandlbinder A, Baier M, Dietz KJ. 2003. Divergent light-, ascorbate-, and oxidative stress-dependent regulation of expression of the peroxiredoxin gene family in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 131, 317–325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jahns P, Holzwarth AR. 2012. The role of the xanthophyll cycle and of lutein in photoprotection of photosystem II. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1817, 182–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jahns P, Latowski D, Strzalka K. 2009. Mechanism and regulation of the violaxanthin cycle: the role of antenna proteins and membrane lipids. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1787, 3–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kangasjärvi S, Lepistö A, Hännikäinen K, Piippo M, Luomala EM, Aro EM, Rintamäki E. 2008. Diverse roles for chloroplast stromal and thylakoid-bound ascorbate peroxidases in plant stress responses. Biochemical Journal 412, 275–285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Karpinska B, Zhang K, Rasool B, Pastok D, Morris J, Verrall SR, Hedley PE, Hancock RD, Foyer CH. 2017a The redox state of the apoplast influences the acclimation of photosynthesis and leaf metabolism to changing irradiance. Plant, Cell and Environment 41, 1083–1097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Karpinska B, Owdah Alomrani S, Foyer CH. 2017b Inhibitor-induced oxidation of the nucleus and cytosol in Arabidopsis thaliana: implications for organelle to nucleus retrograde signalling. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 372, 20160392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kerchev PI, Pellny TK, Vivancos PD, Kiddle G, Hedden P, Driscoll S, Vanacker H, Verrier P, Hancock RD, Foyer CH. 2011. The transcription factor ABI4 is required for the ascorbic acid-dependent regulation of growth and regulation of jasmonate-dependent defense signaling pathways in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 23, 3319–3334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kiddle G, Pastori GM, Bernard S, Pignocchi C, Antoniw J, Verrier PJ, Foyer CH. 2003. Effects of leaf ascorbate content on defense and photosynthesis gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling 5, 23–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kromdijk J, Głowacka K, Leonelli L, Gabilly ST, Iwai M, Niyogi KK, Long SP. 2016. Improving photosynthesis and crop productivity by accelerating recovery from photoprotection. Science 354, 857–861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lichtenthaler HK. 1986. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods in Enzymology 148, 350–382. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lim B, Smirnoff N, Cobbett CS, Golz JF. 2016. Ascorbate-deficient vtc2 mutants in Arabidopsis do not exhibit decreased growth. Frontiers in Plant Science 7, 1025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mano J, Hideg E, Asada K. 2004. Ascorbate in thylakoid lumen functions as an alternative electron donor to photosystem II and photosystem I. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 429, 71–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Maruta T, Tanouchi A, Tamoi M, Yabuta Y, Yoshimura K, Ishikawa T, Shigeoka S. 2010. Arabidopsis chloroplastic ascorbate peroxidase isoenzymes play a dual role in photoprotection and gene regulation under photooxidative stress. Plant and Cell Physiology 51, 190–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Meyer AJ, Brach T, Marty L, Kreye S, Rouhier N, Jacquot JP, Hell R. 2007. Redox-sensitive GFP in Arabidopsis thaliana is a quantitative biosensor for the redox potential of the cellular glutathione redox buffer. The Plant Journal 52, 973–986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Miyaji T, Kuromori T, Takeuchi Y et al. . 2015. AtPHT4;4 is a chloroplast-localized ascorbate transporter in Arabidopsis. Nature Communications 6, 5928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Müller-Moulé P, Conklin PL, Niyogi KK. 2002. Ascorbate deficiency can limit violaxanthin de-epoxidase activity in vivo. Plant Physiology 128, 970–977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Müller-Moulé P, Golan T, Niyogi KK. 2014. Ascorbate-deficient mutants of Arabidopsis grow in high light despite chronic photo-oxidative stress. Plant Physiology 133, 748–760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Munné-Bosch S, Queval G, Foyer CH. 2013. The impact of global change factors on redox signaling underpinning stress tolerance. Plant Physiology 161, 5–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Neff MM, Chory J. 1998. Genetic interactions between phytochrome A, phytochrome B, and cryptochrome 1 during Arabidopsis development. Plant Physiology 118, 27–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Noctor G, Mhamdi A, Foyer CH. 2016. Oxidative stress and antioxidative systems: recipes for successful data collection and interpretation. Plant, Cell and Environment 39, 1140–1160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Osmond CB, Grace CE. 1995. Perspectives on photoinhibition and photorespiration in the field: quintessential inefficiencies of the light and dark reactions of photosynthesis?Journal of Experimental Botany 46, 1351–1362. [Google Scholar]
  49. Page M, Sultana N, Paszkiewicz K, Florance H, Smirnoff N. 2012. The influence of ascorbate on anthocyanin accumulation during high light acclimation in Arabidopsis thaliana: further evidence for redox control of anthocyanin synthesis. Plant, Cell and Environment 35, 388–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Pastori GM, Kiddle G, Antoniw J, Bernard S, Veljovic-Jovanovic S, Verrier PJ, Noctor G, Foyer CH. 2003. Leaf vitamin C contents modulate plant defense transcripts and regulate genes that control development through hormone signaling. The Plant Cell 15, 939–951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Pavet V, Olmos E, Kiddle G, Mowla S, Kumar S, Antoniw J, Alvarez ME, Foyer CH. 2005. Ascorbic acid deficiency activates cell death and disease resistance responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 139, 1291–1303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Pignocchi C, Fletcher JM, Wilkinson JE, Barnes JD, Foyer CH. 2003. The function of ascorbate oxidase in tobacco. Plant Physiology 132, 1631–1641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Powles SB. 1984. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis induced by visible light. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 35, 15–44. [Google Scholar]
  54. Rouhier N. 2010. Plant glutaredoxins: pivotal players in redox biology and iron–sulphur centre assembly. New Phytologist 186, 365–372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Queval G, Noctor G. 2007. A plate reader method for the measurement of NAD, NADP, glutathione, and ascorbate in tissue extracts: application to redox profiling during Arabidopsis rosette development. Analytical Biochemistry 363, 58–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ruban AV, Murchie EH. 2012. Assessing the photoprotective effectiveness of non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching: a new approach. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1817, 977–982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Ruban AV, Pesaresi P, Wacker U, Irrgang KD, Bassi R, Horton P. 1998. The relationship between the binding of dicyclohexylcarbodiimide and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence in the light-harvesting proteins of photosystem II. Biochemistry 37, 11586–11591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Shaikhali J, Heiber I, Seidel T, Ströher E, Hiltscher H, Birkmann S, Dietz KJ, Baier M. 2008. The redox-sensitive transcription factor Rap2.4a controls nuclear expression of 2-Cys peroxiredoxin A and other chloroplast antioxidant enzymes. BMC Plant Biology 8, 48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Smirnoff N, Pallanca JE. 1996. Ascorbate metabolism in relation to oxidative stress. Biochemical Society Transactions 24, 472–478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Smirnoff N. 2000. Ascorbate biosynthesis and function in photoprotection. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 355, 1455–1464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Tamaoki M, Mukai F, Asai N, Nakajima N, Kubo A, Aono M, Saji H. 2003. Light-controlled expression of a gene encodingl-galactono-lactone dehydrogenase which affects ascorbate pool size in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Science 164, 1111–1117. [Google Scholar]
  62. Taylor SH, Long SP. 2017. Slow induction of photosynthesis on shade to sun transitions in wheat may cost at least 21% of productivity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 372, 20160543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Tedone L, Hancock RD, Alberino S, Haupt S, Viola R. 2004. Long-distance transport ofl-ascorbic acid in potato. BMC Plant Biology 4, 16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Tóth SZ, Puthur JT, Nagy V, Garab G. 2009. Experimental evidence for ascorbate-dependent electron transport in leaves with inactive oxygen-evolving complexes. Plant Physiology 149, 1568–1578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Tyystjärvi E. 2013. Photoinhibition of photosystem II. International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology 300, 243–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Tyystjärvi E, Aro EM. 1996. The rate constant of photoinhibition, measured in lincomycin-treated leaves, is directly proportional to light intensity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93, 2213–2218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Vanderauwera S, Zimmermann P, Rombauts S, Vandenabeele S, Langebartels C, Gruissem W, Inzé D, Van Breusegem F. 2005. Genome-wide analysis of hydrogen peroxide-regulated gene expression in Arabidopsis reveals a high light-induced transcriptional cluster involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis. Plant Physiology 139, 806–821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Ware MA, Belgio E, Ruban AV. 2015. Comparison of the protective effectiveness of NPQ in Arabidopsis plants deficient in PsbS protein and zeaxanthin. Journal of Experimental Botany 66, 1259–1270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Wang J, Yu Y, Zhang Z, Quan R, Zhang H, Ma L, Deng XW, Huang R. 2013. Arabidopsis CSN5B interacts with VTC1 and modulates ascorbic acid synthesis. The Plant Cell 25, 625–636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Wheeler GL, Jones MA, Smirnoff N. 1998. The biosynthetic pathway of vitamin C in higher plants. Nature 393, 365–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Yabuta Y, Mieda T, Rapolu M, Nakamura A, Motoki T, Maruta T, Yoshimura K, Ishikawa T, Shigeoka S. 2007. Light regulation of ascorbate biosynthesis is dependent on the photosynthetic electron transport chain but independent of sugars in Arabidopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 2661–2671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Yin ZH, Johnson GN. 2000. Photosynthetic acclimation of higher plants to growth in fluctuating light environments. Photosynthesis Research 63, 97–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Zechmann B, Stumpe M, Mauch F. 2011. Immunocytochemical determination of the subcellular distribution of ascorbate in plants. Planta 233, 1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhang W, Lorence A, Gruszewski HA, Chevone BI, Nessler CL. 2009. AMR1, an Arabidopsis gene that coordinately and negatively regulates the mannose/l-galactose ascorbic acid biosynthetic pathway. Plant Physiology 150, 942–950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhang Z, Wang J, Zhang R, Huang R. 2012. The ethylene response factor AtERF98 enhances tolerance to salt through the transcriptional activation of ascorbic acid synthesis in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 71, 273–287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES