Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2017 Sep 27;15:454–458. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.09.052

Long-read transcriptome data for improved gene prediction in Lentinula edodes

Sin-Gi Park a, Seung il Yoo a, Dong Sung Ryu a, Hyunsung Lee a, Yong Ju Ahn a, Hojin Ryu b, Junsu Ko a, Chang Pyo Hong a,
PMCID: PMC5961913  PMID: 29845094

Abstract

Lentinula edodes is one of the most popular edible mushrooms in the world and contains useful medicinal components such as lentinan. The whole-genome sequence of L. edodes has been determined with the objective of discovering candidate genes associated with agronomic traits, but experimental verification of gene models with correction of gene prediction errors is lacking. To improve the accuracy of gene prediction, we produced 12.6 Gb of long-read transcriptome data of variable lengths using PacBio single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing and generated 36,946 transcript clusters with an average length of 2.2 kb. Evidence-driven gene prediction on the basis of long- and short-read RNA sequencing data was performed; a total of 16,610 protein-coding genes were predicted with error correction. Of the predicted genes, 42.2% were verified to be covered by full-length transcript clusters. The raw reads have been deposited in the NCBI SRA database under accession number PRJNA396788.

Abbreviations: RNA-Seq, whole transcriptome sequencing; GFF, general feature format

Keywords: Gene model, Gene prediction, Lentinula edodes, PacBio Single-molecule real-time (SMRT) transcriptome sequencing


Specifications Table

Subject area Biology
More specific subject area Genomics and Bioinformatics
Type of data Table, Figure, GFF
How data was acquired PacBio single-molecule real-time (SMRT) transcriptome sequencing and evidence-driven gene prediction
Data format Raw, analyzed
Experimental factors RNA isolation, cDNA library construction and PacBio sequencing
Experimental features Long-read transcriptome data with variable lengths were generated, and evidence-driven gene prediction was performed based on the data.
Data source location The monokaryotic B17 strain of Lentinula edodes (KCTC46443) was collected from the Korean Collection for Type Cultures (KCTC) in the Republic of Korea (http://kctc.kribb.re.kr/)
Data accessibility Raw data from this study are available in NCBI's Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database under accession number PRJNA396788 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA396788/)

Value of the data

  • The whole-genome sequence of L. edodes has been determined with the objective of discovering candidate genes associated with agronomic traits [1], but experimental verification of gene models with correction of gene prediction errors is lacking.

  • PacBio long-read transcriptome data integrated with Illumina short-read RNA-Seq data can enhance the accuracy of gene prediction with error correction and support experimental verification.

  • Our data will strengthen genome-wide analyses of L. edodes by contributing to the identification of targeted genes associated with a trait, transcriptome profiling, and comparative genomics.

1. Data

A total of 5,285,247 long-reads producing 12.61 Gb of sequence data were generated from three RNA libraries of the monokaryotic B17 strain of L. edodes that were size-selected for lengths of <2 kb, 2–3 kb, and 3–6 kb (Table 1). Those reads were clustered into 36,946 transcripts with a cumulative length of approximately 82.1 Mb and an average length of 2.2 kb (Fig. 1). Based on exon-intron boundary information generated by aligning the PacBio long-read (12.6 Gb) and Illumina short-read (3.36 Gb) [1] RNA-Seq data to the draft genome sequence of L. edodes [1], a total of 16,610 protein-coding genes were predicted with error correction (Table 2, Table 3). Of those genes, 1344 were newly identified. The transcriptome data supported 92.9% of the predicted gene models (Fig. 2). Moreover, 7005 gene models (42.2%) were verified to be covered by full-length transcript clusters. Homology-based searches indicated that 76.2% of the predicted genes had homology with known genes. Functional annotations were tentatively assigned for 38.3% of these genes. GFF files and annotations of gene models for L. edodes are provided in the Supplementary data (Supplementary material 1 and 2).

Table 1.

Summary of PacBio long-read transcriptome data in L. edodes B17.

Library size
<2 kb 2–3 kb 3–6 kb
No. of subreadsa 2,027,562 1,404,810 1,852,875
Total length of subreads (Gb) 3.36 3.49 5.76
No. of reads of inserts 196,775 207,733 351,503
No. of full-length reads 91,513 96,258 150,541
No. of non-full-length reads 82,559 99,023 188,716
No. of filtered short reads 22,703 12,452 12,246
Polished consensus isoforms 12,874 11,223 12,849
Average length of isoforms (bp) 1373 2236 3064
a

Adapters and artefacts were removed.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The length distribution of clustered transcripts.

Table 2.

Summary of gene prediction and annotation updated in L. edodes B17.

This study Shim et al. (2016)
Protein-coding gene (No.) 18,663 13,426
Unique gene models (No.) 16,610 13,028
Genes with isoforms (No.) 2053 398
Supported by RNA-Seq (No.) 15,263 11,781
Annotated (No.)a 12,662 10,700
Average gene length (bp) 1288 1612
Total length of gene models (Mb) 24.05 21.64
Exons
 No. of exons 91,386 77,650
 No. of average exons per gene 4.89 5.78
 Average exon length (bp) 196 204
Introns
 No. of exons 72,723 64,224
 No. of average exons per gene 3.89 4.78
 Average exon length (bp) 83 90
a

Gene models were annotated with homology-based searches.

Table 3.

Summary of correction of gene models.

No. of gene models 1
Exactly overlapped 7889
Split into≥two gene models 4742
Fused with≥two gene models 343
Structurally re-predicted 261
Newly found 1344
Predicted in the only previous study 2031

1 Gene models in the present study were structurally compared with those reported by Shim et al. [1].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The distribution of gene models supported by PacBio long-read and Illumina short-read RNA-Seq data.

2. Experimental design, materials and methods

2.1. Materials

The monokaryotic B17 strain of L. edodes (KCTC46443) [1] was obtained from the Korean Collection for Type Cultures (KCTC) in the Republic of Korea (http://kctc.kribb.re.kr/).

2.2. RNA extraction and PacBio SMRT transcriptome sequencing

Total RNA from the monokaryotic B17 strain of L. edodes, which was cultured in potato dextrose broth liquid medium for 10 days at 25 °C, was extracted using an RNA extraction kit (iNtRon Biotech, Seoul, Korea). cDNA was obtained from the RNA and was size-selected into fractions with the following length ranges: 1–2 kb, 2–3 kb, 3–6 kb, and >6 kb. SMRTbell template libraries were created from the obtained cDNAs for sequencing on the PacBio RS II system, as recommended by Pacific Biosciences (Palo Alto, U.S.A.). The templates were sequenced via polymerase binding using the DNA/Polymerase Binding Kit P6 v2 primers.

2.3. Long-read transcriptome data clustering, gene prediction and annotation

Long-read transcriptome data clustering was performed using SMRT Analysis software v2.3.0 (https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/SMRT-Analysis) with (i) generation of reads of insert (ROIs), (ii) classification of full-length reads, and (iii) clustering for building consensus sequences.

For gene prediction in the genome of L. edodes, AUGUSTUS [2] was used to perform de novo prediction with prior gene models trained using GeneMark-ET [3] and exon-intron boundary information predicted by RNA and protein sequence alignments. To generate transcriptome-based evidence, TopHat [4] and GMAP [5] were used for short- and long-read RNA-Seq alignments, respectively. To generate protein-based evidence, homologous protein sequences were collected from the NCBI non-redundant (NR) database, and Exonerate [6] was used for protein sequence alignments to produce protein-based evidence. Predicted genes were searched in the UniProt and NCBI NR databases using BLASTP [7] with a cut-off E-value of 1×10−10. Protein domains were also searched using InterProScan [8] and then assigned to Gene Ontology (GO) terms.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Strategic Initiative for Microbiomes in Agriculture and Food (grant no. 914008-04) from the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Republic of Korea.

Footnotes

Transparency document

Transparency data associated with this article can be found in the online version at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2017.09.052.

Appendix A

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2017.09.052.

Transparency document. Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc1.zip (576.2KB, zip)

.

Appendix A. Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1. Gene models for L. edodes in GFF.

mmc2.zip (1.6MB, zip)

.

Supplementary material 2. Annotation of gene models of L. edodes in accordance with homology-based searches.

mmc3.xlsx (2.5MB, xlsx)

.

References

  • 1.Shim D., Park S.G., Kim K., Bae W., Lee G.W., Ha B.S., Ro H.S., Kim M., Ryoo R., Rhee S.K., Nou I.S., Koo C.D., Hong C.P., Ryu H. Whole genome de novo sequencing and genome annotation of the world popular cultivated edible mushroom, Lentinula edodes. J. Biotechnol. 2016;223:24–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.02.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stanke M., Diekhans M., Baertsch R., Haussler D. Using native and syntenically mapped cDNA alignments to improve de novo gene finding. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:637–644. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lomsadze A., Burns P.D., Borodovsky M. Integration of mapped RNA-Seq reads into automatic training of eukaryotic gene finding algorithm. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:e119. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Trapnell C., Pachter L., Salzberg S.L. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1105–1111. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wu T.D., Watanabe C.K. GMAP: a genomic mapping and alignment program for mRNA and EST sequences. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:1859–1875. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Slater G.S., Birney E. Automated generation of heuristics for biological sequence comparison. BMC Bioinform. 2005;6:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Altschul S.F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E.W., Lipman D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990;215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Quevillon E., Silventoinen V., Pillai S., Harte N., Mulder N., Apweiler R., Lopez R. InterProScan: protein domains identifier. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W116–W120. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

mmc1.zip (576.2KB, zip)

Supplementary material 1. Gene models for L. edodes in GFF.

mmc2.zip (1.6MB, zip)

Supplementary material 2. Annotation of gene models of L. edodes in accordance with homology-based searches.

mmc3.xlsx (2.5MB, xlsx)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES