Skip to main content
Scientific Data logoLink to Scientific Data
. 2018 May 22;5:180097. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.97

HormoneBase, a population-level database of steroid hormone levels across vertebrates

Maren N Vitousek 1,a,*, Michele A Johnson 2,b,*, Jeremy W Donald 3, Clinton D Francis 4, Matthew J Fuxjager 5, Wolfgang Goymann 6, Michaela Hau 6, Jerry F Husak 7, Bonnie K Kircher 8, Rosemary Knapp 9, Lynn B Martin 10, Eliot T Miller 11, Laura A Schoenle 10, Jennifer J Uehling 1, Tony D Williams 12
PMCID: PMC5963335  PMID: 29786693

Abstract

Hormones are central regulators of organismal function and flexibility that mediate a diversity of phenotypic traits from early development through senescence. Yet despite these important roles, basic questions about how and why hormone systems vary within and across species remain unanswered. Here we describe HormoneBase, a database of circulating steroid hormone levels and their variation across vertebrates. This database aims to provide all available data on the mean, variation, and range of plasma glucocorticoids (both baseline and stress-induced) and androgens in free-living and un-manipulated adult vertebrates. HormoneBase (www.HormoneBase.org) currently includes >6,580 entries from 476 species, reported in 648 publications from 1967 to 2015, and unpublished datasets. Entries are associated with data on the species and population, sex, year and month of study, geographic coordinates, life history stage, method and latency of hormone sampling, and analysis technique. This novel resource could be used for analyses of the function and evolution of hormone systems, and the relationships between hormonal variation and a variety of processes including phenotypic variation, fitness, and species distributions.

Subject terms: Animal behaviour, Ecophysiology, Physiology, Evolution, Animal physiology

Background & Summary

Hormones are central regulators of phenotype, whose effects span multiple fields of research, from molecular biology to population biology1–5. Because of their role in regulating organismal function and flexibility, selection might be expected to constrain hormone levels or their context-dependent flexibility around one or more fitness optima6–9. Nevertheless, endocrine responses vary markedly both within and among populations8,10–12. Why do some individuals mount a hormonal response that is two or more orders of magnitude greater than others, when faced with the same stimulus? Similarly, why have some species evolved to express plasma testosterone levels that are an order of magnitude greater than others during reproduction, when testosterone mediates the same basic reproductive processes?

A particularly promising approach to answering such questions – and many others of broad interest to animal behaviour and organismal biology – lies in large-scale comparative analyses of the multitude of endocrine data that have been collected over the past several decades. Such analyses, conducted within a rigorous phylogenetic, environmental, and life-history framework, have the potential to illuminate the factors driving divergence in the hormonal mechanisms of behaviour, physiology, and morphology13,14. To date, most analyses have focused on relatively small taxonomic scales, and on comparing mean trait values across populations and species15–19. However, resources are rapidly becoming available to aggregate and analyse decades of available data on circulating hormone levels and their variation within free-living populations, across taxonomic groups. Identifying and characterizing the variation in endocrine traits, and their links with environment, life history, and fitness, could provide insight into how endocrine systems evolve, and how selection on these phenotypic integrators may influence the dynamics and distribution of populations20–23.

In this context, we present HormoneBase, a resource of compiled endocrine data across vertebrates. Included in this dataset are >6,580 measures of mean and within-population variation in glucocorticoids and androgens from 476 species (Figs 1,2; Table 1) that were reported in 648 publications – and additional unpublished resources – between 1967 and 2015. Additional information on geographic location (Fig. 3), life history, study design, and time period accompanies each entry. By making HormoneBase publicly available we aim to encourage data sharing across the scientific community and facilitate research into the function and evolution of physiological traits.

Figure 1. Total data entries in HormoneBase for each steroid by measurement type and sex.

Figure 1

Within each category, counts are shown separately for mean, coefficient of variation, and range.

Figure 2. The number of species with data on mean hormone concentrations in HormoneBase.

Figure 2

Counts are shown separately for males and females, and for androgens, baseline glucocorticoids, and stress-induced glucocorticoids.

Table 1. The taxonomic distribution of entries of mean circulating hormone levels in HormoneBase for males (M) and females (F).

  Birds
Reptiles
Amphibians
Mammals
Fish
Total
  M F M F M F M F M F M F
Androgens 1002 366 497 176 217 78 270 21 713 436 2699 1077
Baseline GCs 746 488 230 167 104 45 59 60 89 73 1228 833
Stress-induced GCs 352 212 26 28 29 7 20 27 23 20 450 294

Figure 3. The geographical distribution of entries in HormoneBase.

Figure 3

Points represent the location of measurements of (a) androgens, (b) baseline glucocorticoids, and (c) stress-induced glucocorticoids. Precipitation patterns reflect sums for December 2015 and were acquired from the CRU-TS 4.0 Climate Database36.

Methods

Hormonal Data

Endocrine data were obtained from publications, and from several unpublished datasets (Data Citation 1). We searched for studies that conformed to our inclusion criteria using: (i) online academic databases (e.g., Google Scholar, Web of Science), and (ii) cross-referencing from other published works. Studies were selected for inclusion if they included data on circulating glucocorticoids (baseline or stress-induced corticosterone/cortisol) or androgens (testosterone/11-ketotestosterone) that: (i) were from free-living populations, (ii) were collected from adults that had not been subject to an experimental manipulation prior to sampling (e.g., of hormones or the environment), (iii) measured plasma levels, (iv) did not pool data across males and females, or across adults and juveniles, and (v) were reported in or could be converted to a standard unit of measurement (ng/mL).

Published values were obtained from text, tables, or supplementary materials, or extracted from published figures using the program Data Thief III (http://datathief.org). Entries include mean circulating concentrations (ng/mL) for each population/group and time period; whenever possible, data on within-population variation (coefficient of variation, standard error), range (maximum and minimum values), and sample size are also included. When papers did not directly report the coefficient of variation (CV), it was calculated from the standard deviation (SD) or standard error (SE) and sample size (n), according to the following formulas: CV=SDmean*100 or CV=SE*nmean*100. If papers reported that outliers had been excluded we noted this for each hormone measure, and noted the criteria for exclusion where provided.

When a single reference reported multiple means for different groups of individuals (e.g., populations or life history stages), or from different time points, data were entered on separate lines. In cases where papers reported a single hormonal mean from data collected across multiple populations, the location of up to three of the sampled populations was noted in the entry. When stress-induced glucocorticoid levels were measured at multiple time points during a standardized stress series, only the time period at which mean glucocorticoid levels were highest was included.

The decision was made to focus HormoneBase on androgens and glucocorticoids because these are currently the most widely sampled hormones across vertebrates. Because hormone concentrations are not directly comparable across biological matrices, we included only plasma hormone concentrations. Hormone levels are also increasingly being measured in other biological matrices (e.g., feces, feathers) but these sample types are not very well-suited for large-scale comparative analyses because they use hormone metabolites, which differ within and across species and assay/antibody types24.

Sample Collection and Assay Method Data

Because sampling method and assay technique may influence circulating hormone levels, we included specific information about capture, sampling, and assay approach. The time of day (i.e., range of hours) that samples were collected was recorded as provided. The specific method used to capture free-living individuals was noted, and the capture/sampling method assigned to one of three categories. “Active” sampling methods were those in which a blood sample was obtained rapidly and within a known period of time after targeting a previously undisturbed animal. “Passive” methods are those in which animals were sampled after an unknown period of restraint (e.g., non-continuously monitored traps or nets). “Attractant” methods are those in which animals were drawn to the site of capture using some type of attractant (e.g., song playbacks, baited traps). The maximum sampling latency (interval from capture to blood sampling) was recorded for androgens and baseline glucocorticoids, and the type of acute stressor and the interval from initial capture to the collection of a stress-induced glucocorticoid sample were also recorded.

To explore and control for potential differences in assay technique, we included information on the assay method used to assess plasma hormone levels (e.g., radioimmunoassay, enzyme immunoassay), and, where provided, the specific antibody or commercial kit that was used. Because laboratory identity can also influence measured hormone levels25, we recorded the identity of the laboratory in which hormone assays were conducted. For collaborative papers that did not identify where assays were conducted, and were the product of multiple endocrine laboratories, we arbitrarily assigned one of the collaborating laboratories as the assay location.

Taxonomic and Geographical Data

All endocrine data include associated taxonomic information, using common and scientific names. Where relevant, scientific names were updated to reflect recent reclassifications. Taxonomy was determined using major lineage-specific trees (ray-finned fishes26, amphibians27,28, mammals29, squamates30, turtles31, and birds32).

The location name, geographic coordinates (latitude and longitude in degrees decimal), and elevation (in meters) of the population from which the data were collected are also recorded for each entry. When not provided in the original publication, approximate geographic coordinates and elevation were determined by searching for the location name in Google Earth.

Temporal and Life History Data

To enable assessment of seasonal and life history patterns17,33,34, we included information on the time period of sampling as reported (the month and year in which data were collected) and the life history stage of sampled individuals. Measurements were characterized as coming from breeding or non-breeding individuals, or a combination of the two. Designations were based on author classifications when provided. When life history stage was not provided in the original data source, samples were classified as coming from a combination of breeding and non-breeding individuals, except in cases where seasonally breeding populations were sampled only during months that did not overlap with the breeding season.

When life history sub-stage was provided in the original data source, this information was also included in the database. To provide some standardization across species, and widely varying terminology, reported sub-stages were combined into fourteen categories: pre-breeding, courtship, incubation, copulation, gravid/pregnant, non-gravid/pregnant, laying, young care, lactation, post-breeding, migration, torpor, hibernation, pre-basic moult. When information about life history sub-stage was not contained in the original data source, this field was left blank. An associated column provides information about whether the sampled individuals were confirmed to be in a given life history stage (e.g., incubating birds captured off their nests), or whether the life history stage reflected the typical stage for individuals in that population at the time of sampling (e.g., birds sampled in mist nets during the breeding season but not traced to a specific nest). For birds, information on moult status was also recorded as provided35.

Data Records

The HormoneBase dataset (Data Citation 1) is provided as two comma-separated values text files: a single file that includes all data described above (HormoneBase_v1.csv), and a file that contains the reference information for the source of each entry (HormoneBase_references_v1.csv). Variable names are provided in the first row, with details of each variable and units measured summarized in Table 2 (available online only). These files are accompanied by a metadata pdf file (HormoneBase_MetadataData.pdf).

Table 2. Variables included in HormoneBase.

Variable name Variable definition Data type/unit
Vert_Group Taxonomic group (amphibian, bird, fish, mammal, reptile) String
Genus Genus String
Species Species String
Common_name Common name String
Population_1 Name of first location at which samples were collected (city/region, state/province, country) String
Population_2 If applicable, name of second location at which samples were collected String
Population_3 If applicable, name of third location at which samples were collected String
Latitude Latitude of primary sampling location Degrees decimal
Longitude Longitude of primary sampling location Degrees decimal
LatLongEst Were latitude and longitude reported in the paper or estimated by data entry team? Binary (Reported/Estimated)
Elevation Elevation at primary sampling location Numerical (in m)
Years Year(s) during which study was conducted Year
Year_1 First year of study Year
Year_final Final year of study Year
Breeding_Cycle Data collected during breeding, non-breeding, or both Breeding/Nonbreeding/Breeding, Nonbreeding
Moult Measurements were collected during moult Binary (Y/N)
Life_Stage Life history sub-stage (when provided): Prebreeding, Courtship, Incubation, Copulation, Gravid/Pregnant, Non-Gravid/Pregnant, Laying, Young care, Lactation, Post-breeding, Migration, Torpor, Hibernation, Pre-basic moult. If hormones were measured for a distinct morph or social status, indicated here String
LifeHistConf Sampled individuals were confirmed to be in the designated life history stage Binary (Y/N)
Jan_Sampled Measures were collected in January Binary (Y/N)
Feb_Sampled Measures were collected in February Binary (Y/N)
Mar_Sampled Measures were collected in March Binary (Y/N)
Apr_Sampled Measures were collected in April Binary (Y/N)
May_Sampled Measures were collected in May Binary (Y/N)
June_Sampled Measures were collected in June Binary (Y/N)
July_Sampled Measures were collected in July Binary (Y/N)
Aug_Sampled Measures were collected in August Binary (Y/N)
Sept_Sampled Measures were collected in September Binary (Y/N)
Oct_Sampled Measures were collected in October Binary (Y/N)
Nov_Sampled Measures were collected in November Binary (Y/N)
Dec_Sampled Measures were collected in December Binary (Y/N)
Time_min Beginning of sampling window Time (24h:min)
Time_max End of sampling window Time (24h:min)
CaptureMethod Method of capture String
SampleMethod Sampling active (known time to sampling, no attractants), passive (captured for unknown period before sampling), or attractant (captured with aid of playback, baited traps, etc.) Active, Passive, Attractant
MaxLatency_A Maximum sampling latency for androgens Numerical (min)
MaxLatency_Cort Maximum sampling latency for baseline glucocorticoids Numerical (min)
LateStressCort Latency between capture and stress-induced sample Numerical (min)
StressorType Type of stressor applied (baseline to stress-induced) String
MajorStressPop Major stressor experienced by population (if relevant) String
Method Assay method String
A_AntibodyKit Kit or antibody used for androgen assays String
Cort_AntibodyKit Kit or antibody used for cort assays String
CORT Glucocorticoid measured Binary (corticosterone/ cortisol)
Androgen Androgen measured Binary (testosterone/ 11-ketotestosterone)
M_A_ Mean Males - mean androgen concentration Numerical (ng/mL)
M_A_SE Males - Standard error of androgens Numerical
M_A_CV Males - Coefficient of variation in androgens Numerical
M_A_N Males - Sample size for androgens Numerical
M_A_Min Males - Minimum reported androgen value Numerical (ng/mL)
M_A_Max Males - Maximum reported androgen value Numerical (ng/mL)
M_A_RemoveOutlier Males - Were androgen outliers removed? Binary (Y/N)
F_A_Mean Females - Mean androgen concentration Numerical (ng/mL)
F_A_SE Females - Standard error of androgens Numerical
F_A_CV Females - Coefficient of variation in androgens Numerical
F_A_N Females - Sample size for androgens Numerical
F_A_Min Females - Minimum reported androgen value Numerical (ng/mL)
F_A_Max Females - Maximum reported androgen value Numerical (ng/mL)
F_A_RemoveOutlier Females - Were androgen outliers removed? Binary (Y/N)
M_BC_Mean Males - mean baseline cort concentration Numerical (ng/mL)
M_BC_SE Males - Standard error of baseline cort Numerical
M_BC_CV Males - Coefficient of variation in baseline cort Numerical
M_BC_N Males - Sample size for baseline cort Numerical
M_BC_Min Males - Minimum reported value of baseline cort Numerical (ng/mL)
M_BC_Max Males - Maximum reported value of baseline cort Numerical (ng/mL)
M_BC_RemoveOutlier Males - Were baseline cort outliers removed? Binary (Y/N)
F_BC_Mean Females - Mean baseline cort concentration Numerical (ng/mL)
F_BC_SE Females - Standard error of baseline cort Numerical
F_BC_CV Females - Coefficient of variation in baseline cort Numerical
F_BC_N Females - Sample size for baseline cort Numerical
F_BC_Min Females - Minimum reported value of baseline cort Numerical (ng/mL)
F_BC_Max Females - Maximum reported value of baseline cort Numerical (ng/mL)
F_BC_RemoveOutlier Females – Were baseline cort outliers removed? Binary (Y/N)
M_SC_Mean Males - Mean stress-induced cort concentration Numerical (ng/mL)
M_SC_SE Males - Standard error of stress-induced cort Numerical
M_SC_CV Males - Coefficient of variation in stress-induced cort Numerical
M_SC_N Males - Sample size for stress-induced cort Numerical
M_SC_Min Males - Minimum reported value of stress-induced cort Numerical (ng/mL)
M_SC_Max Males - Maximum reported value of stress-induced cort Numerical (ng/mL)
M_SC_RemoveOutlier Males - Were stress-induced cort outliers removed? Binary (Y/N)
F_SC_Mean Females - Mean stress-induced cort concentration Numerical (ng/mL)
F_SC_SE Females - Standard error of stress-induced cort Numerical
F_SC_CV Females - Coefficient of variation in stress-induced cort Numerical
F_SC_N Females - Sample size for stress-induced cort Numerical
F_SC_Min Females - Minimum reported value of stress-induced cort Numerical (ng/mL)
F_SC_Max Females - Maximum reported value of stress-induced cort Numerical (ng/mL)
F_SC_RemoveOutlier Females – Were stress-induced cort outliers removed? Binary (Y/N)
OutlierCriteria Criteria for removing outliers String
Notes Notes on data String
Lab_ID PI of lab where assays conducted, if specified; if unspecified, arbitrarily assigned to one of the collaborating endocrine labs String
Ref_ID Reference to data source Code

Technical Validation

The data presented in HormoneBase are primarily from published, peer-reviewed sources, but also contain unpublished data provided by authors. Data entry was initially proofed by each lab that entered the data to confirm that the entries matched reported data. Upon submission to the central repository, two members of the database entry team independently examined each entry to identify incomplete entries or extreme values. All hormone measures were also mapped onto a phylogeny to reveal putative taxonomic outliers. When such cases were identified, entries were confirmed or corrected by consulting the original source.

Usage Notes

The data are available to access and download from Figshare repository (Data Citation 1). Three files are provided:

  1. HormoneBase_v1.csv

  2. HormoneBase_references_v1.csv

  3. Metadata.pdf

Additional information

How to cite this article: Vitousek, M. N. et al. HormoneBase, a population-level database of steroid hormone levels across vertebrates. Sci. Data 5:180097 doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.97 (2018).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Sarah Burgan, Stefania Casagrande, Pete Collins, Julia Cramer, Travis Flock, Jennifer Hoots, Michael Jessel, Lucia Mentesana, Meredith Miles, Steffanie Munguia, Samantha Murphy, Sophie Nicolich-Henkin, Sara Ocasio, Eric Schuppe, Beth Skinner, Jocelyn Stedman, Ashley Stenstrom, Sarah Talamantes, and Andrew Wang for assistance compiling hormone data. We are especially grateful to John Wingfield for submitting a substantial amount of unpublished data for inclusion in HormoneBase, and to Patrick Kelley for compiling these data.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing interests.

Data Citations

  1. Vitousek M. N., et al. . 2017. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5649727

References

  1. Adkins-Regan E. Hormones and Animal Social Behavior (Princeton University Press, 2005). [Google Scholar]
  2. Lösel R. & Wehling M. Nongenomic actions of steroid hormones. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 4, 46–55, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1009 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beato M. Gene regulation by steroid hormones. Cell 56, 335–344 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dantzer B. et al. Density triggers maternal hormones that increase adaptive offspring growth in a wild mammal. Science 340, 1215–1217, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1235765 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Duckworth R. A., Belloni V. & Anderson S. R. Cycles of species replacement emerge from locally induced maternal effects on offspring behavior in a passerine bird. Science 347, 875–877 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hau M. Regulation of male traits by testosterone: implications for the evolution of vertebrate life histories. BioEssays 29, 133–144, https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.20524 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McGlothlin J. W. & Ketterson E. D. Hormone-mediated suites as adaptations and evolutionary constraints. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci 363, 1611–1620https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.0002 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Williams T. D. Individual variation in endocrine systems: moving beyond the ‘tyranny of the Golden Mean’. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 363, 1687–1698, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.0003 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohen A. A., Martin L. B., Wingfield J. C., McWilliams S. R. & Dunne J. A. Physiological regulatory networks: ecological roles and evolutionary constraints. Trends Ecol. Evol 27, 428–435, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.04.008 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cockrem J. F. Individual variation in glucocorticoid stress responses in animals. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol 181, 45–58, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2012.11.025 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kempenaers B., Peters A. & Foerster K. Sources of individual variation in plasma testosterone levels. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci 363, 1711–1723, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.0001 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Stedman J. M., Hallinger K. K., Winkler D. W. & Vitousek M. N. Heritable variation in circulating glucocorticoids and endocrine flexibility in a free-living songbird. J. Evol. Biol 30, 1724–1735, https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13135 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jessop T. S. et al. Multiscale evaluation of thermal dependence in the glucocorticoid response of vertebrates. Am. Nat. 188, 342–356 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Crespi E. J., Williams T. D., Jessop T. S. & Delehanty B. Life history and the ecology of stress: how do glucocorticoid hormones influence life-history variation in animals? Funct. Ecol 27, 93–106, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12009 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  15. Bókony V. et al. Stress response and the value of reproduction: are birds prudent parents? Am. Nat 173, 589–598, https://doi.org/10.1086/597610 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Eikenaar C., Husak J., Escallón C. & Moore I. T. Variation in testosterone and corticosterone in amphibians and reptiles: relationships with latitude, elevation, and breeding season length. Am. Nat 180, 642–654, https://doi.org/10.1086/667891 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hau M., Ricklefs R. E., Wikelski M., Lee K. A. & Brawn J. D. Corticosterone, testosterone and life-history strategies of birds. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci 277, 3203–3212, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0673 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Goymann W. et al. Testosterone in tropical birds: effects of environmental and social factors. Am. Nat. 164, 327–334 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Goymann W. & Wingfield J. C. Male-to-female testosterone ratios, dimorphism, and life history - what does it really tell us? Behav. Ecol. 25, 685–699 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  20. Zera A. J., Harshman L. G. & Williams T. D. Evolutionary endocrinology: the developing synthesis between endocrinology and evolutionary genetics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst 38, 793–817, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095615 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  21. Wingfield J. C. The comparative biology of environmental stress: Behavioural endocrinology and variation in ability to cope with novel, changing environments. Anim. Behav 85, 1127–1133, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.02.018 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  22. Taff C. C. & Vitousek M. N. Endocrine flexibility: optimizing phenotypes in a dynamic world? Trends Ecol. Evol 31, 476–488, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.03.005 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Martin L. B., Burgan S. C., Adelman J. S. & Gervasi S. S. Host competence: an organismal trait to integrate immunology and epidemiology. Integr. Comp. Biol. 56, 1225–1237 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Goymann W. On the use of non-invasive hormone research in uncontrolled, natural environments: the problem with sex, diet, metabolic rate, and the individual. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 757–765, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00203.x (2012). [Google Scholar]
  25. Fanson K. V., Németh Z., Ramenofsky M., Wingfield J. C. & Buchanan K. L. Inter-laboratory variation in corticosterone measurement: Implications for comparative ecological and evolutionary studies. Methods Ecol. Evol 8, 1745–1754, https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12821 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  26. Rabosky D. L. et al. Rates of speciation and morphological evolution are correlated across the largest vertebrate radiation. Nat. Commun 4, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2958 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pyron R. A. & Wiens J. J. A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol 61, 543–583, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2011.06.012 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Eastman J. M., Harmon L. J. & Tank D. C. Congruification: support for time scaling large phylogenetic trees. Methods Ecol. Evol 4, 688–691, https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12051 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  29. Bininda-Emonds O. R. P. et al. The delayed rise of present-day mammals. Nature 446, 507–512, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05634 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pyron R. A., Burbrink F. T. & Wiens J. J. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes. BMC Evol. Biol 13, 93, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-93 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Jaffe A. L., Slater G. J. & Alfaro M. E. The evolution of island gigantism and body size variation in tortoises and turtles. Biol. Lett 7, 558–561, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2010.1084 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jetz W., Thomas G. H., Joy J. B., Hartmann K. & Mooers O. The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491, 444–448, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11631 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Romero L. M. Seasonal changes in plasma glucocorticoid concentrations in free-living vertebrates. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 128, 1–24 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wingfield J. C. & Sapolsky R. M. Reproduction and resistance to stress: when and how. J. Neuroendocrinol. 15, 711–724 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Romero L. M., Bauer C. M., de Bruijn R. & Lattin C. R Seasonal rhythmsin Stress: Neuroendocrinology and Neurobiology 421–427, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802175-0.00042-5 (Elsevier, 2017). [Google Scholar]
  36. Harris I., Jones P. D., Osborn T. J. & Lister D. H. Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3.10 Dataset. Int. J. Climatol 34, 623–642, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3711 (2014). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Citations

  1. Vitousek M. N., et al. . 2017. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5649727

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Scientific Data are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES