Abstract
Ca2+ mediates a host of biochemical and biophysical signaling processes in cells. The development of synthetic, Ca2+-sensitive fluorophores has played an instrumental role in understanding of the temporal and spatial dynamics of Ca2+. Coupling Ca2+-selective ligands to fluorescent reporters has provided a wealth of excellent indicators that span the visible excitation and emission spectrum and possess Ca2+ affinities suited to a variety of cellular contexts. One under-developed area is the use of hybrid rhodamine/fluorescein fluorophores, or rhodols, in the context of Ca2+ sensing. Rhodols are bright, photostable, and have good two-photon absorption cross-sections (σTPA), making them excellent candidates for incorporation into Ca2+-sensing scaffolds. Here, we present the design, synthesis, and application of rhodol Ca2+ sensor- 1 (RCS-1), a chlorinated pyrrolidine-based rhodol. RCS-1 possesses a Ca2+ binding constant of 240 nM and a 10-fold turn-response to Ca2+. RCS-1 effectively absorbs infrared light and has a σTPA of 76 GM at 840 nm, 3-fold greater than its fluorescein-based counterpart. The acetoxy-methyl ester of RCS-1 stains the cytosol of live cells, enabling observation of Ca2+ fluctuations in cell lines and cultured neurons using both one- and two-photon illumination. Together, these results demonstrate the utility of rhodol-based scaffolds for Ca2+ sensing using two-photon illumination in neurons.
Graphical Abstract
The development of synthetic fluorescent indicators for Ca2+ ions is one of the success stories of organic chemistry and molecular recognition. The majority of fluorescent Ca2+ indicators utilize BAPTA (1,2-bis(o-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid) as the key Ca2+-recognizing domain and couple Ca2+ binding to changes in fluorescence intensity or wavelength.1 First reported in 1980 by Roger Tsien,2 BAPTA solved dual problems of slow Ca2+-binding kinetics and pH dependence associated with the state of the art Ca2+-selective chelator of the day, EGTA (ethyleneglycol- N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid). Importantly BAPTA maintains selectivity for Ca2+ over Mg2+, which is present in concentrations exceeding cytosolic Ca2+ by 4 to 5 orders of magnitude. Widely used Ca2+ indicators include fura-2,3 which provides a ratiometric read-out of Ca2+ concentration using UV excitation; the fluo- and rhod-family of indicators that report on fluctuations in Ca2+ concentration via changes in fluorescence intensity at around 520 and 580 nm, respectively;4 and OregonGreen-BAPTA (OGB)5 and CalciumGreen-BAPTA (CGB)6 derivatives that employ fluorinated and chlorinated fluorescein as an optical reporter. More recently, the use of modern xanthene scaffolds has enabled access to Ca2+ sensing in the orange (Cal-590,7 CaRuby-Nano8) to far-red (CaTM29 or Cal-630) region of the electromagnetic spectrum by employing halogenated carbofluorescein10 or silicon-fluorescein, respectively.
Ca2+ indicators are widely used in neurobiology, where fluorescent indicators provide a convenient method to measure the relative activity of neurons. OGB, in particular, continues to be used for in vivo applications,11 despite the recent emergence of excellent genetically-encoded Ca2+-sensitive fluorescent proteins,12 on account of its well-tuned Kd (170 nM) and fast Ca2+-binding kinetics. 13 The use of fluorescent Ca2+ indicators, whether synthetically- derived or genetically-encoded, is frequently paired with two-photon microscopy, which allows greater tissue penetration on account of the use of high energy, pulsed lasers in the infrared regime. Despite the critical dependence on the use of two-photon illumination to image in thick tissues, most widely-used Ca2+ indicators show only modest ability to effectively absorb two-photon (2P) illumination.14 CGB has a two photon excitation cross section of approximately 30 GM (when saturated with Ca2+).15 Alternatively, indicators based on rhodamines, with larger 2P cross sections in the 50 to 100 GM range (for example, Calcium Orange or Calcium Crimson),15 often localize to cellular compartments rather than cytosol.16 To surmount the problems of low 2P cross section while maintaining good Ca2+ affinity, sensitivity, and cellular localization, we hypothesized that rhodol-based fluorophores17 would enable Ca2+ sensing under 2P illumination in live cells. Rhodols have intermediate to strong 2P cross sections, at around 120 GM,18, 19 and show good cellular localization. 20, 21 Despite these promising characteristics, rhodols have never been combined with BAPTA to create a Ca2+ sensor. We here report the design, synthesis, characterization and application of rhodol Ca2+-sensor 1, a fluorescent Ca2+ indicator with good 2P excitation cross section, sub-micromolar dissociation constants for Ca2+, and the ability to report on [Ca2+] fluxes in live cells and neurons under 2P illumination.
Rhodol Ca2+ sensor 1 is synthesized in a single step from the corresponding 6′-carboxy-dichloropyrrolidylrhodol (1) and the AM-ester of 5-aminoBAPTA (2) (Scheme 1). Synthesis of 1 proceeds in 4 steps from carboxy-dichlorofluorescein. Construction of isomerically pure 6′-carboxy-dichlorofluorescein is achieved via recrystallization from acetic anhydride/pyridine to give the 6′ isomer in gram quantities.22 Protection of the pendant carboxylate as the t-butyl ester23 enables selective protection of a single phenolic oxygen as the methyoxymethyl (MOM) ether24 and subsequent conversion of the remaining oxygen to the triflate. Conversion of the fluorescein to rhodol proceeds via Pd-catalyzed C-N bond formation with pyrrolidine followed by removal of the t-butyl ester to give compound 1 in 30% yield over two steps. Formation of amide bond between rhodol 1 and the tetra-acetoxymethyl ester of 5′-amino-BAPTA 29 provides the acetoxy methyl ester of rhodol Ca2+ sensor 1 (RCS-1 AM) in 15% overall yield following purification. Saponification of this material provides the hexapotassium salt of RCS (RCS-1 K) for in vitro spectroscopic characterization.
Scheme 1.
Synthesis of rhodol Ca2+ sensor 1.
RCS-1 shows excitation and emission profiles characteristic of substituted rhodols, with a λmax absorption at 515 nm and emission maximum centered at 551 nm (Figure 1a). Addition of Ca2+ results in an increase in fluorescence intensity (Figure 1a). The quantum yield for RCS-1 is Ca2+-dependent. In the absence of Ca2+, Φ551 is 0.073; in the presence of saturating levels of Ca2+ (39 μM), Φ551 is 0.73. There is no Ca2+-dependent change in absorption (Figure 1a). Titration with Ca2+ reveals a dissociation constant of 240 nM (±6 nM, S.E.M., n = 3 separate determinations), which is well-matched to the Kd reported for CGB-1 (190 nM)6, 13 (Figure 1b, Figure S1). In our hands, we determined a Kd of 180 nM for CGB-1 (±5 nM, S.E.M., n = 3 separate determinations), indicating a good match between RCS-1 and CGB-1. RCS-1 possesses a large dynamic range in response to Ca2+, exhibiting a 10- fold increase (±1, S.E.M., n = 3) in fluorescence intensity upon Ca2+ binding (Figure 1b), again, well-matched to the dynamic range for CGB-1 (which we measured as a 13-fold increase).6 We measured the two-photon excitation spectrum of RCS-1. Using rhodamine B as a standard, we determined the two-photon absorption cross-section (σTPA) of RCS-1.15, 19 RCS-1 displays a σTPA maximum at 840 nm, with a value of 72 GM. This is 3-fold larger than the 24 GM σTPA value we determined for CGB-1 (approximately 24 GM at 840 nm).15
Figure 1.
Spectroscopy characterization of rhodol Ca2+ sensor 1. a) Absorbance spectrum of rhodol Ca2+ sensor 1 (10 μM) in the absence (black dotted line) and presence (black solid line) of 39 μM Ca2+. Fluorescence emission spectra of rhodol Ca2+ sensor 1 (10 μM) in the absence (green dotted line) and presence (green solid line) of 39 μM Ca2+. Excitation provided at 515 nm. b) Ca2+ titration of rhodol Ca2+ sensor 1. The fluorescence emission spectra of rhodol Ca2+ sensor 1 was recorded at increasing concentrations of Ca2+ from 0 μM to 39 μM, with intermediate concentrations of 17 nM, 38 nM, 65 nM, 100 nM, 150 nM, 225 nM, 351 nM, 602 nM, and 1.35 μM. Excitation provided at 515 nm. c) Two-photon absorption spectra of rhodol Ca2+ sensor 1 with Ca2+ (39 μM). Error bars are ± standard deviation for n = 3 separate determinations.
The combination of large turn-on response to Ca2+ binding, nanomolar dissociation constant, and strong two-photon absorption cross-section suggests RCS-1 will be useful for monitoring Ca2+ transients in living cells. To investigate the ability of RCS-1 to report on Ca2+ fluxes in live cells, we utilized the tetra-AM ester version of RCS-1. Masking polar carboxylates with AM esters enable uptake anionic BAPTA-containing indicators into cells.25 Cellular esterases remove the AM esters, liberating the Ca2+-responsive fluorophore. Bath application of RCS-1 to HeLa cells (1.7 μM, with Pluronic F-127, 0.01%) resulted in bright intracellular fluorescence, as determined by laser scanning confocal microscopy (Figure 2a). Stimulation of RCS-1-loaded cells with histamine (5 μM) resulted in the induction of periodic Ca2+ oscillations that were readily observable with RCS-1 fluorescence (Figure 2b). Gratifyingly, Ca2+ transients could be monitored using infrared, two-photon microscopy, with excitation provided at 840 nm (Figure 2c and d). Under both one- and two-photon illumination, RCS-1 displays photostability comparable to CGB-1.
Figure 2.
Live-cell imaging of histamine-evoked Ca2+ fluctuations with rhodol Ca2+ sensor 1. a) Confocal fluorescence microscopy images (one-photon) of HeLa cells incubated with rhodol Ca2+ sensor tetra-AM (1.7 μM). Scale bar is 20 μm. b) Quantification of intracellular [Ca2+] fluctuations measured in response to stimulation with histamine (5 μM). c) Two photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy images of HeLa cells incubated with rhodol Ca2+ sensor tetra-AM (1.7 μM). Scale bar is 20 μm. d) Quantification of intracellular [Ca2+] fluctuations measured in response to stimulation with histamine (5 μM).
Building on these observations, we next determined whether RCS-1 could report on neuronal activity in cultured mammalian hippocampal neurons. Incubation of RCS-1 (1.7 μM, with Pluronic F-127, 0.01%) with cultured rat hippocampal neurons resulted in bright cellular fluorescence, as determined by widefield epifluorescence microscopy (Figure 3a). RCS-1 can report on spontaneous activity in hippocampal cultures (Figure 3b). Action potentials evoked by field stimulation give clear increases in fluorescence (Figure S2). Importantly, RCS-1 can also report on spontaneous activity in cultured neurons when imaged under 2P illumination, using 840 nm excitation light (Figure 3c and d).
Figure 3.
Visualization of Ca2+ transients in rat hippocampal neurons using rhodol Ca2+ sensor 1. a) Widefield fluorescence micrograph of cultured rat hippocampal neurons incubated with rhodol Ca2+ sensor 1 tetra AM ester (1.7 μM). Scale bar is 20 μm. b) Relative changes rhodol Ca2+ sensor 1 fluorescence vs. time for neurons in panel a. c) Two-photon laser scanning microscopy image of rat hippocampal neuron stained with rhodol Ca2+ sensor 1 tetra AM ester (1.7 μM). Scale bar is 20 μM. d) Intracellular Ca2+ transients recorded as relative changes in rhodol Ca2+ sensor 1 fluorescence vs. time for the neuron in panel c.
In summary, we present the design, synthesis, and application of RCS-1, a rhodol-based fluorescent indicator for Ca2+. The large turn-on response to Ca2+, high Ca2+ affinity, and good two-photon cross-section of RCS-1, coupled with the ability to monitor spontaneous activity in cultured neurons, make it a promising candidate for monitoring [Ca2+] transients in the context of neurobiology and beyond.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Alison Killilea for expert technical assistance with cell culture, and Holly Aaron and Jen-Yi Lee for their microscopy training and assistance. Confocal and two-photon microscopy experiments were performed at the Molecular Imaging Center at UC Berkeley, supported by the Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute. Research in the Miller lab is generously supported by the NIH (R35GM119855), Sloan Foundation, and the Klingenstein- Simons Foundation.
Footnotes
Synthetic, spectroscopic and imaging data. The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website.
References
- 1.Adams SR. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2010. 2010. pdb top70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tsien RY. Biochemistry. 1980;19:2396–2404. doi: 10.1021/bi00552a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Grynkiewicz G, Poenie M, Tsien RY. J Biol Chem. 1985;260:3440–3450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Minta A, Kao JP, Tsien RY. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:8171–8178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gee KR, Poot M, Klaubert DH, Sun W-C, Haugland RP, Mao F. Molecular Probes, Inc; USA: 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kuhn MA, Haugland RP. Molecular Probes, Inc; USA: 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Diwu Z, Guo H, Peng R, Zhao Q, Liu J, Liao J. 374, 967. AAT Bioquest, Inc; USA: U.S Ser No. 2014
- 8.Collot M, Wilms CD, Bentkhayet A, Marcaggi P, Couchman K, Charpak S, Dieudonne S, Hausser M, Feltz A, Mallet JM. Elife. 2015:4. doi: 10.7554/eLife.05808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Egawa T, Hirabayashi K, Koide Y, Kobayashi C, Takahashi N, Mineno T, Terai T, Ueno T, Komatsu T, Ikegaya Y, Matsuki N, Nagano T, Hanaoka K. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2013;52:3874–3877. doi: 10.1002/anie.201210279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Grimm JB, Sung AJ, Legant WR, Hulamm P, Matlosz SM, Betzig E, Lavis LD. ACS Chem Biol. 2013;8:1303–1310. doi: 10.1021/cb4000822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Grienberger C, Konnerth A. Neuron. 2012;73:862–885. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chen TW, Wardill TJ, Sun Y, Pulver SR, Renninger SL, Baohan A, Schreiter ER, Kerr RA, Orger MB, Jayaraman V, Looger LL, Svoboda K, Kim DS. Nature. 2013;499:295–300. doi: 10.1038/nature12354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Paredes RM, Etzler JC, Watts LT, Zheng W, Lechleiter JD. Methods. 2008;46:143–151. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2008.09.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mutze J, Iyer V, Macklin JJ, Colonell J, Karsh B, Petrasek Z, Schwille P, Looger LL, Lavis LD, Harris TD. Biophys J. 2012;102:934–944. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.12.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xu C, Williams RM, Zipfel W, Webb WW. Bioimaging. 1996;4:198–207. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Oheim M, van’t Hoff M, Feltz A, Zamaleeva A, Mallet JM, Collot M. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1843:2284–2306. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Whitaker JE, Haugland RP, Ryan D, Hewitt PC, Prendergast FG. Anal Biochem. 1992;207:267–279. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(92)90011-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Poronik YM, Clermont G, Blanchard-Desce M, Gryko DT. J Org Chem. 2013;78:11721–11732. doi: 10.1021/jo401653t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kulkarni RU, Kramer DJ, Pourmandi N, Karbasi K, Bateup HS, Miller EW. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:2813–2818. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1610791114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dickinson BC, Chang CJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:9638–9639. doi: 10.1021/ja802355u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kathayat RS, Elvira PD, Dickinson BC. Nat Chem Biol. 2017;13:150–152. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Woodroofe CC, Masalha R, Barnes KR, Frederickson CJ, Lippard SJ. Chemistry & Biology. 2004;11:1659–1666. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2004.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Grimm JB, English BP, Chen J, Slaughter JP, Zhang Z, Revyakin A, Patel R, Macklin JJ, Normanno D, Singer RH, Lionnet T, Lavis LD. Nat Methods. 2015;12:244–250. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Peng T, Yang D. Organic Letters. 2010;12:496–499. doi: 10.1021/ol902706b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tsien RY. Nature. 1981;290:527–528. doi: 10.1038/290527a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.