Table 2. Methodological quality of the study based on NOS Scale.
Study | Selection
(Max ****) |
Comparability
(Max **) |
Outcome
(Max ***) |
Total
Score |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Representativeness
of exposed cohort |
Selection
of exposed cohort |
Ascertainment
of exposure |
No outcome
of interest at start |
Comparability of
cohorts on the basis of design of analysis |
Assessment
of outcome |
Was follow-up
long enough for outcomes to occur |
Adequacy of
follow up of cohorts |
||
Bello 2017 25 | * | * | * | * | ** | * | Not clear | Not clear | 7 |
Choueiri 2009 5 | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 9 |
Glass 2003 9 | * | * | * | * | ** | * | Not clear | Not clear | 7 |
Hong 2012 10 | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9 |
Hussain 2006 11 | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9 |
Kadono 2015 4 | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9 |
Kim 2015 18 | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9 |
Kimura 2014 24 | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 8 |
Koo 2014 17 | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9 |
Kwak 2002 | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9 |
Miller 1992 19 | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 8 |
Miyamoto
2012 14 |
* | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9 |
Nayyar 2010 | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9 |
Park 2009 15 | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9 |
Sasaki 2011 22 | * | * | * | * | ** | * | - | * | 7 |
Teoh 2017 21 | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9 |
Tomioka 2014 20 | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9 |