Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Genetics logoLink to Frontiers in Genetics
. 2018 May 16;9:162. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00162

Identification of Central Regulators of Calcium Signaling and ECM–Receptor Interaction Genetically Associated With the Progression and Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation

Petra Büttner 1,*, Laura Ueberham 1, M B Shoemaker 2, Dan M Roden 2, Borislav Dinov 1, Gerhard Hindricks 1, Andreas Bollmann 1, Daniela Husser 1
PMCID: PMC5964985  PMID: 29868113

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a multifactorial disease with a strong genetic background. It is assumed that common and rare genetic variants contribute to the progression and recurrence of AF. The pathophysiological impact of those variants, especially when they are synonymous or non-coding, is often elusive and translation into functional experiments is difficult. In this study, we propose a method to go straight from genetic variants to defined gene targets. We focused on 55 genes from calcium signaling and 26 genes from extra cellular matrix ECM–receptor interaction that we found to be associated with the progression and recurrence of AF. These genes were mapped on protein–protein interaction data from three different databases. Based on the concept that central regulators are highly connected with their neighbors, we identified central hub proteins according to random walk analysis derived scores representing interaction grade. Our approach resulted in the identification of EGFR, RYR2, and PRKCA (calcium signaling) and FN1 and LAMA1 (ECM–receptor interaction) which represent promising targets for further functional characterization or pharmaceutical intervention.

Keywords: protein–protein interactions, genetic variants, atrial fibrillation, atrial fibrillation recurrence, atrial fibrillation progression, calcium signaling, ECM–receptor interaction

Introduction

Common genetic variants contribute to the progression and recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF; Olesen et al., 2014). We recently used genome-wide association study data from 660 AF patients to detect common variants that associate with left atrial diameter, AF type (paroxysmal vs. persistent AF), and AF recurrence (Husser et al., 2016a,b). Based on the hypothesis that all genetic variants irrespective of their significance level contribute to genetic background, we included all variants with p < 0.05 in our analysis irrespective if they were coding, non-coding, synonymous, or non-synonymous. Using a stepwise filtering procedure, we shifted the conventional SNP-based analysis toward a gene-based analysis (Li et al., 2011; Chanda et al., 2013) and finally tested the genes for non-random enrichment in physiological pathways. This approach revealed an association of calcium signaling (55 genes) and ECM–receptor interaction (26 genes) with left atrial diameter and AF type, respectively, and also with AF recurrence (Husser et al., 2016a; see Supplementary Table S1). Abnormal intracellular Ca(2+) load, distribution, and handling are involved in AF initiation, maintenance, and progression (Nattel and Dobrev, 2012) as well as heterogeneous conduction slowing and reentry (Yue et al., 2011). Ca(2+) influx into atrial fibroblasts triggers differentiation into ECM-remodeling myofibroblasts which in turn trigger atrial fibrosis, the basis of electroanatomical remodeling, and AF maintenance and progression (Yue et al., 2011). Cardiac fibrosis is furthermore characterized by altered ECM–receptor interactions of cell–cell contacts and cell–matrix adhesions involving integrins, fibronectin, collagen, and laminin (Giancotti and Ruoslahti, 1999; Schroer and Merryman, 2015).

Central pathway regulators represent promising targets for replication and explorative studies. In silico protein-network analysis can be used for the identification of these regulators. Protein–protein interaction (PPI) data from functional and bioinformatics experiments are available in PPI databases (Calderone et al., 2013; Alonso-Lopez et al., 2016; Fabregat et al., 2016) whereas their composition, complexity, and reliability differ. The mapping of candidate genes to PPI networks can be done using the freely accessible software tool Cytoscape (Shannon et al., 2003) and the application iPINBA (Wang et al., 2015).

Summarizing, we applied an approach putting together PPI data and the recently identified candidate genes from GWAS analysis to identify central regulators of calcium signaling and ECM–receptor interaction associated with AF progression and recurrence.

Materials and Methods

This study was based on recently published findings (Husser et al., 2016a). Patient characteristics, clinical parameters, genome-wide association analysis, gene-based association testing, pathway analysis, and gene lists can be found in Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Table S1. The study protocol was approved by the local Ethics Committee. All patients signed written informed consent for study participation.

PPI Network Analysis

Cytoscape v3.4.0 (Shannon et al., 2003) was used for PPI network construction. UniProt identifiers for all candidate genes were retrieved from UniProt ID mapping service1 (Supplementary Table S1). PPI data were imported via PSICQUIC client (Aranda et al., 2011) or manually from original repositories. The selection of a specific database introduces a bias as the PPI evidence criteria applied by the database curators differ. Therefore, we included three manually curated databases in our analysis to minimize bias.

We used data from Agile Protein Interactomes Data Server (APID; Alonso-Lopez et al., 2016), mentha PPI database (mentha; Calderone et al., 2013), and Reactome knowledgebase (Fabregat et al., 2016). Furthermore, APID, Reactome and mentha access data from other important PPI databases, namely, Molecular INTeraction database (MINT; Licata et al., 2012), IntAct Molecular Interaction Database (IntAct; Orchard et al., 2014), Database of Interacting Proteins (DIP; Salwinski et al., 2004), extracellular matrix interaction database (MatrixDB; Launay et al., 2015), BioPlex (Huttlin et al., 2015), and BioGRID (Chatr-Aryamontri et al., 2017). At the time of analysis (February 2017), mentha interactome comprised 259,599 interactions of 18,245 proteins, APID database comprised 349,144 interactions for 29,701 proteins, and Reactome included 221,866 interactions of 8631 proteins.

Cytoscape app iPINBPA (Wang et al., 2015) was used for further analysis. Candidate genes from calcium signaling and ECM–receptor interaction (Supplementary Table S1) were mapped on the three PPI networks to build sub-networks.

Random Walk Analysis

To identify the central regulators in the sub-network, we applied random walk analysis. Random walk technique explores a network by simulating a walker who chooses randomly among available edges starting from one or many seed genes. Over time the walker will pass by all members in the network with different probabilities whereas highly connected nodes are more probably passed by several times (Can et al., 2005). All genes in sub-networks with more than two edges were assigned seed genes for random walk analysis. Random walk node weights (RWNW) calculated by iPINBPA were used to rank the candidate genes in descending order. Cytoscape network analyzer tool was used to determine the number of direct edges of every candidate gene. Sub-networks were visualized using Cytoscape.

We applied a two-step approach. First, we identified all candidate genes with more than two edges that were present among the top 10 RWNW rankings in every interactome (APID, mentha, and Reactome). This analysis was based on PPI data summarizing all reported interactions without evidence weighting including solely predicted interactions. Second, genes that passed step one were reanalyzed using more stringent PPI evidence filters according to APID level 2 PPI data (115,480 interactions of 16,016 proteins) summarizing only PPI validated in at least two independent experiments, e.g., co-expression, co-purification, co-crystallization, or yeast2hybrid (Alonso-Lopez et al., 2016).

Results

Genes from the pathways calcium signaling and ECM–receptor interaction, which we found associated with left atrial diameter increase, a switch from paroxysmal to persistent AF, and AF recurrence in a former study, were mapped on PPI data from three official databases, namely, APID, mentha, and Reactome. Sub-networks including all genes with at least two neighbors were created using iPINBPA. Nineteen (APID), 44 (Reactome), and 13 (mentha) genes from calcium signaling and eight (APID), 25 (Reactome), and six (mentha) genes from ECM–receptor interaction fulfilled these criteria. We next applied RWNW ranking to the sub-networks (Table 1). Finally, we identified those genes that ranked among the top 10 in all three sub-networks (flowchart depicted in Figure 1).

Table 1.

Ranking of candidate proteins from (A) calcium signaling pathway and (B) ECM–receptor interaction pathway by random walk node weights (RWNW) using PPI data from three databases.

APID
 Reactome
 Mentha
Gene RWNW Edges Gene RWNW Edges Gene RWNW Edges
(A) Calcium signaling pathway
PRKCA 0.062 10 GNA14 0.046 14 EGFR 0.079 13
EGFR 0.054 8 CALML3 0.030 12 RYR2 0.061 6
RYR2 0.049 4 PRKCA 0.029 10 PRKCA 0.057 5
GNAQ 0.045 3 RYR2 0.028 12 PLCB1 0.056 5
RYR1 0.045 3 RYR3 0.027 11 GRIN1 0.053 4
GRIN1 0.044 5 RYR1 0.027 11 RYR1 0.052 4
ITPR1 0.041 3 PRKCB 0.027 14 PTGER3 0.050 3
PLCB1 0.039 3 GNAQ 0.024 8 SYK 0.047 3
SYK 0.038 5 EGFR 0.024 8 ERBB4 0.044 2
PRKCB 0.035 4 PLCB1 0.023 11 ATP2B4 0.044 2
(B) ECM–receptor interaction pathway
FN1 0.137 8 FN1 0.0486 21 FN1 0.1227 5
DAG1 0.088 3 LAMA1 0.0470 19 DAG1 0.1077 4
LAMA1 0.081 3 ITGB3 0.0446 18 LAMA1 0.0885 3
CD36 0.069 3 ITGA1 0.0445 20 SDC2 0.0810 2
SDC2 0.069 2 LAMC3 0.0444 19 ITGB3 0.0810 2
HSPG2 0.060 2 LAMA3 0.0440 18 HSPG2 0.0781 3
ITGB3 0.059 2 LAMA5 0.0428 17 LAMA3 0.0660 1
COL4A2 0.059 2 COL4A2 0.0414 17 CD36 0.0660 1
LAMA3 0.057 1 ITGA4 0.0412 18 ITGA1 0.0627 1
AGRN 0.055 1 ITGA9 0.0412 18 AGRN 0.0619 1
Open in a new tab

Candidate genes in bold were identified in every interactome.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Flowchart of the stepwise approach that was used to identify central hub proteins out of 55 genes annotated to calcium signaling (light gray boxes) and 26 genes annotated to ECM–receptor interaction (dark gray boxes).

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), ryanodine receptor 2 (RYR2), phospholipase C, beta 1 (PLCB1), ryanodine receptor 1 (RYR1), and protein kinase C alpha (PRKCA) from calcium signaling and fibronectin (FN1) and Laminin subunit alpha-1 (LAMA1) from ECM–receptor interaction were identified to be hub proteins.

We additionally repeated the analysis using more stringent APID level 2 assigned data, comprising only PPIs that were confirmed at least twice in independent experiments excluding predicted interactions. We confirmed all candidates except PLCB1 and RYR1 (Figure 2). The remaining candidates EGFR, RYR2, PRKCA, FN1, and LAMA1 thus had at least two experimentally validated protein–protein physical interactions in the analyzed network.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Open in a new tab

Protein interaction network of AF associated genes assigned to calcium signaling (A,B) and ECM–receptor interaction pathway (C,D) based on APID level 1 evidence level (A,C) and APID level 2 evidence level data which were validated at least twice (B,D). Hub proteins are marked yellow.

Discussion

Conventional GWAS identified genetic variants associated to AF by applying genome-wide significance level of 5 × 10-8. By analyzing their genomic loci, new candidate genes were identified, e.g., PITX2, TBX5, ZFHX3, and KCNN3 (Fatkin et al., 2017). We applied a completely different approach using gene-based association testing and pathway enrichment and thus identified ECM–receptor interaction (26 genes) and calcium signaling (55 genes) to be most significantly associated with AF type, LAD increase, and AF recurrence (Husser et al., 2016a).

In this study, we aimed to develop a weighting method to identify promising candidate genes out of the unweighted gene lists. Our approach was based on the hypothesis that densely connected proteins in PPI networks, so-called hub proteins, are expected to be biologically essential proteins with the potential consequence that loss of these proteins is hardly tolerated by the organism what is referred to as “centrality-lethality rule” (Gursoy et al., 2008).

Our analysis was based on APID, Reactome, and mentha database as these reported at least 200 PPIs between the candidates of either pathway enabling a reasonable analysis. These PPI data comprise a heterogeneous collection of observations of different quality. We addressed this by utilizing and comparing three interactomes as we assumed that this approach decreases bias and increases reliability of results. For example, Reactome reported GNA14 and CALML3 to be among the mostly connected proteins in the analyzed network but this finding was not validated by APID and mentha data (see Table 1). We used random walk analysis to establish ranking scores indicating connectivity. Random walk analysis is a widely accepted method to explore networks and to identify highly connected nodes (Can et al., 2005; Huan et al., 2014). Additionally, we determined the number of direct edges. Ranking according to the number of edges would result in slightly different ranking of the genes, as in networks, central proteins are more likely passed by in random walk and are thus ranked higher than equally connected proteins at the rim (Figure 2). RWNW ranking therefore enables ranking of genes with equal numbers of direct edges. Our approach identified EGFR, PRKCA, and RYR2 as central regulators of calcium signaling and FN1 and LAMA1 in ECM–receptor interaction. Involvement of the aforementioned genes in pathomechanism of arrhythmia was already partly examined.

EGF–receptor transactivation and dysregulation is involved in myocardial hypertrophy and contraction (Eguchi et al., 2013; Xu et al., 2014). In an animal model, EGF–receptor phosphorylation led to tyrosine phosphorylation of cardiac Na(+) and L-type Ca(2+) channels and thus modulated electrical excitability of the heart and ischemia/reperfusion associated cardiac arrhythmia (Feng et al., 2012).

PRKCA gene and protein expression was found upregulated in cardiac hypertrophy (Dorn and Force, 2005). Genetic variation in PRKCA was found to be associated with QRS duration (Sotoodehnia et al., 2010; Arking et al., 2014).

The main regulators of calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum are ryanodine receptors whereas RYR2 is the main cardiac isoform. Imbalances in RYR2 expression as well as genetic variants are associated with altered calcium handling and arrhythmia (Zhabyeyev et al., 2013; Di Pino et al., 2014; Li et al., 2014).

Fibronectin is a component of extra cellular matrix and FN1 expression by fibroblasts was found to be increased in myocardial fibrotic remodeling and failing myocardium (Schaper et al., 2002; Fan et al., 2012). Levels of circulating fibronectin were found to be associated with atrial remodeling in AF (Canpolat et al., 2015).

Laminin is a major component of ECM, especially the basement membrane, and was found to be expressed significantly higher in the left atrium compared to left ventricle (Burstein et al., 2008). Laminin is involved in cardiac development and pathological remodeling (Schaper et al., 2002; Burstein et al., 2008).

Limitations

The initial GWAS study design, resulting in the identification of AF associated calcium signaling and ECM–receptor interaction, was based on small sample size and a cross-sectional study design. We addressed this by analyzing well-defined phenotypes and applying a two-step approach (i.e., identification of pathways in two AF phenotypes and validation in a third phenotype).

We utilized and compared three interactomes. Far more PPI databases exist that are applicable for such an analysis and all PPI databases undergo constant editing suggesting that there is interesting developmental potential for the kind of analysis introduced by us.

Causative relationships of the identified regulators and AF progression and recurrence were not assessed and cannot be estimated from the underlying study design.

We are well aware that many more genes and pathways contribute to AF than we analyzed in our study (Fatkin et al., 2017). We started from pre-defined genes and pathways’ resulting from an innovative multi-step filter approach that was recently published by our group. Important candidates identified by other studies which are not part of calcium signaling and ECM–receptor interaction were beyond the focus of our study. PITX2, ZFHX3, and KCNN3 were analyzed in a single gene approach as recently published by our group (Husser et al., 2017).

Finally, we want to point out that our gene-based analysis of GWAS data completely differs from conventional analysis with application of genome-wide significance cut off of at least 5E-8 for single SNPs. Gene-based analysis is a supplement but not a substitute for conventional analysis approaches.

Conclusion

We identified EGFR, PRKCA, RYR2 and FN1, LAMA1 as central regulators of calcium signaling and ECM–receptor interaction associated with AF progression and recurrence. Further studies, especially functional analyses, should focus on the aforementioned central pathway regulators to elucidate the pathophysiological background of AF and their possible role as pharmacological targets.

Author Contributions

DH, AB, and PB conceived and initiated the project, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. LU and PB did the laboratory work. MS, DR, BD, and GH participated in data interpretation and critically revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed and contributed to the final manuscript, approved its publication, and are accountable for the content.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding. DH and PB were supported by the Volkswagen Foundation Germany (# 84901).

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2018.00162/full#supplementary-material

Click here for additional data file. (51.5KB, doc)

References

  1. Alonso-Lopez D., Gutierrez M. A., Lopes K. P., Prieto C., Santamaria R., De Las Rivas J. (2016). APID interactomes: providing proteome-based interactomes with controlled quality for multiple species and derived networks. 44 W529–W535. 10.1093/nar/gkw363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aranda B., Blankenburg H., Kerrien S., Brinkman F. S. L., Ceol A., Chautard E., et al. (2011). PSICQUIC and PSISCORE: accessing and scoring molecular interactions. 8 528–529. 10.1038/nmeth.1637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arking D. E., Pulit S. L., Crotti L., van der Harst P., Munroe P. B., Koopmann T. T., et al. (2014). Genetic association study of QT interval highlights role for calcium signaling pathways in myocardial repolarization. 46 826–836. 10.1038/ng.3014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burstein B., Libby E., Calderone A., Nattel S. (2008). Differential behaviors of atrial versus ventricular fibroblasts: a potential role for platelet-derived growth factor in atrial-ventricular remodeling differences. 117 1630–1641. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.748053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Calderone A., Castagnoli L., Cesareni G. (2013). mentha: a resource for browsing integrated protein-interaction networks. 10 690–691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Can T., Çamoǧlu O., Singh A. K. (2005). “Analysis of protein-protein interaction networks using random walks,” in New York, NY: 61–68. 10.1145/1134030.1134042 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Canpolat U., Oto A., Yorgun H., Sunman H., Sahiner L., Kaya E. B., et al. (2015). “Tek basina” paroksismal atriyum fibrilasyonunda plazma fibronektin duzeyi ile sol atriyumun elektriksel ve yapisal yeniden sekillenmesi arasindaki iliski: kesitsel bir calisma. 43 259–268. 10.5543/tkda.2015.83893 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chanda P., Huang H., Arking D. E., Bader J. S. (2013). Fast association tests for genes with FAST. 8:e68585. 10.1371/journal.pone.0068585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chatr-Aryamontri A., Oughtred R., Boucher L., Rust J., Chang C., Kolas N. K., et al. (2017). The BioGRID interaction database: 2017 update. 45 D369–D379. 10.1093/nar/gkw1102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Di Pino A., Caruso E., Costanzo L., Guccione P. (2014). A novel RyR2 mutation in a 2-year-old baby presenting with atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, and atrial ectopic tachycardia. 11 1480–1483. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.04.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dorn G. W., II, Force T. (2005). Protein kinase cascades in the regulation of cardiac hypertrophy. 115 527–537. 10.1172/JCI24178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Eguchi A., Eguchi S., Tilley D. G. (2013). Unexpected cardiac hypertrophy by epidermal growth factor receptor silencing. 61:e46. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fabregat A., Sidiropoulos K., Garapati P., Gillespie M., Hausmann K., Haw R., et al. (2016). The reactome pathway knowledgebase. 44 D481–D487. 10.1093/nar/gkv1351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fan D., Takawale A., Lee J., Kassiri Z. (2012). Cardiac fibroblasts, fibrosis and extracellular matrix remodeling in heart disease. 5:15. 10.1186/1755-1536-5-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fatkin D., Santiago C. F., Huttner I. G., Lubitz S. A., Ellinor P. T. (2017). Genetics of atrial fibrillation: state of the art in 2017. 26 894–901. 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Feng M., Xiang J.-Z., Ming Z.-Y., Fu Q., Ma R., Zhang Q.-F., et al. (2012). Activation of epidermal growth factor receptor mediates reperfusion arrhythmias in anaesthetized rats. 93 60–68. 10.1093/cvr/cvr281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Giancotti F. G., Ruoslahti E. (1999). Integrin signaling. 285 1028–1032. 10.1126/science.285.5430.1028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gursoy A., Keskin O., Nussinov R. (2008). Topological properties of protein interaction networks from a structural perspective. 36 1398–1403. 10.1042/BST0361398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Huan T., Wu X., Bai Z., Chen J. Y. (2014). Seed-weighted random walk ranking for cancer biomarker prioritisation: a case study in leukaemia. 9 135–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Husser D., Büttner P., Ueberham L., Dinov B., Sommer P., Arya A., et al. (2016a). Genomic contributors to rhythm outcome of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation - pathway enrichment analysis of GWAS data. 11:e0167008. 10.1371/journal.pone.0167008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Husser D., Büttner P., Ueberham L., Dinov B., Sommer P., Arya A., et al. (2017). Association of atrial fibrillation susceptibility genes, atrial fibrillation phenotypes and response to catheter ablation: a gene-based analysis of GWAS data. 15:71. 10.1186/s12967-017-1170-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Husser D., Ueberham L., Dinov B., Kosiuk J., Kornej J., Hindricks G., et al. (2016b). Genomic contributors to atrial electroanatomical remodeling and atrial fibrillation progression: pathway enrichment analysis of GWAS data. 6:36630. 10.1038/srep36630 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Huttlin E. L., Ting L., Bruckner R. J., Gebreab F., Gygi M. P., Szpyt J., et al. (2015). The BioPlex network: a systematic exploration of the human interactome. 162 425–440. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Launay G., Salza R., Multedo D., Thierry-Mieg N., Ricard-Blum S. (2015). MatrixDB, the extracellular matrix interaction database: updated content, a new navigator and expanded functionalities. 43 D321–D327. 10.1093/nar/gku1091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Li M.-X., Gui H.-S., Kwan J. S. H., Sham P. C. (2011). GATES: a rapid and powerful gene-based association test using extended Simes procedure. 88 283–293. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.01.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Li N., Chiang D. Y., Wang S., Wang Q., Sun L., Voigt N., et al. (2014). Ryanodine receptor-mediated calcium leak drives progressive development of an atrial fibrillation substrate in a transgenic mouse model. 129 1276–1285. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006611 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Licata L., Briganti L., Peluso D., Perfetto L., Iannuccelli M., Galeota E., et al. (2012). MINT, the molecular interaction database: 2012 update. 40 D857–D861. 10.1093/nar/gkr930 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nattel S., Dobrev D. (2012). The multidimensional role of calcium in atrial fibrillation pathophysiology: mechanistic insights and therapeutic opportunities. 33 1870–1877. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Olesen M. S., Nielsen M. W., Haunsø S., Svendsen J. H. (2014). Atrial fibrillation: the role of common and rare genetic variants. 22 297–306. 10.1038/ejhg.2013.139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Orchard S., Ammari M., Aranda B., Breuza L., Briganti L., Broackes-Carter F., et al. (2014). The MIntAct project–IntAct as a common curation platform for 11 molecular interaction databases. 42 D358–D363. 10.1093/nar/gkt1115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Salwinski L., Miller C. S., Smith A. J., Pettit F. K., Bowie J. U., Eisenberg D. (2004). The database of interacting proteins: 2004 update. 32 D449–D451. 10.1093/nar/gkh086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Schaper J., Kostin S., Hein S., Elsasser A., Arnon E., Zimmermann R. (2002). Structural remodelling in heart failure. 7 64–68. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Schroer A. K., Merryman W. D. (2015). Mechanobiology of myofibroblast adhesion in fibrotic cardiac disease. 128 1865–1875. 10.1242/jcs.162891 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Shannon P., Markiel A., Ozier O., Baliga N. S., Wang J. T., Ramage D., et al. (2003). Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. 13 2498–2504. 10.1101/gr.1239303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sotoodehnia N., Isaacs A., de Bakker P. I., Dorr M., Newton-Cheh C., Nolte I. M., et al. (2010). Common variants in 22 loci are associated with QRS duration and cardiac ventricular conduction. 42 1068–1076. 10.1038/ng.716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang L., Mousavi P., Baranzini S. E. (2015). “iPINBPA: an integrative network-based functional module discovery tool for genome-wide association studies,” in Kohala, HI: 255–266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Xu X.-Y., Nie Y., Wang F.-F., Bai Y., Lv Z.-Z., Zhang Y.-Y., et al. (2014). Growth differentiation factor (GDF)-15 blocks norepinephrine-induced myocardial hypertrophy via a novel pathway involving inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation. 289 10084–10094. 10.1074/jbc.M113.516278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Yue L., Xie J., Nattel S. (2011). Molecular determinants of cardiac fibroblast electrical function and therapeutic implications for atrial fibrillation. 89 744–753. 10.1093/cvr/cvq329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhabyeyev P., Hiess F., Wang R., Liu Y., Wayne Chen S. R., Oudit G. Y. (2013). S4153R is a gain-of-function mutation in the cardiac Ca2+ release channel ryanodine receptor associated with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. 29 993–996. 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.12.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (51.5KB, doc)

Articles from Frontiers in Genetics are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES