Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci Methods. 2018 Mar 31;303:30–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.03.006

Methodology and effects of repeated intranasal delivery of DNSP-11 in awake Rhesus macaques

MJ Stenslik 1, A Evans 1, F Pomerleau 1, R Weeks 1, P Huettl 1, E Foreman 1, J Turchan-Cholewo 1, A Andersen 3, WA Cass 1, Z Zhang 1, RC Grondin 1, DM Gash 1, GA Gerhardt 1, LH Bradley 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC5965701  NIHMSID: NIHMS960565  PMID: 29614295

Abstract

Background

To determine if the intranasal delivery of neuroactive compounds is a viable, long-term treatment strategy for progressive, chronic neurodegenerative disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease (PD), intranasal methodologies in preclinical models comparable to humans are needed.

New Method

We developed a methodology to evaluate the repeated intranasal delivery of neuroactive compounds on the non-human primate (NHP) brain, without the need for sedation. We evaluated the effects of the neuroactive peptide, DNSP-11 following repeated intranasal delivery and dose-escalation over the course of 10-weeks in Rhesus macaques. This approach allowed us to examine striatal target engagement, safety and tolerability, and brain distribution following a single 125I-labeled DNSP-11 dose.

Results

Our initial data support that repeated intranasal delivery and dose-escalation of DNSP-11 resulted in bilateral, striatal target engagement based on neurochemical changes in DA metabolites-without observable, adverse behavioral effects or weight loss in NHPs. Furthermore, a 125I-labeled DNSP-11 study illustrates diffuse rostral to caudal distribution in the brain including the striatum-our target region of interest.

Comparison with Existing Methods

The results of this study are compared to our experiments in normal and 6-OHDA lesioned rats, where DNSP-11 was repeatedly delivered intranasally using a micropipette with animals under light sedation.

Conclusions

The results from this proof-of-concept study support the utility of our repeated intranasal dosing methodology in awake Rhesus macaques, to evaluate the effects of neuroactive compounds on the NHP brain. Additionally, results indicate that DNSP-11 can be safely and effectively delivered intranasally in MPTP-treated NHPs, while engaging the DA system.

Keywords: intranasal, Parkinson’s disease, peptide, drug delivery

1.0. Introduction

One of the major challenges in delivering large molecular weight (MW) compounds, such as peptides and proteins to the Central Nervous System (CNS), has been their targeted delivery to the brain [14]. The presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers (BCSFBs) greatly restricts the passive entry of large MW compounds into the CNS following oral and parenteral routes of administration [36]. Therefore, invasive surgical techniques are generally used to deliver compounds directly to the brain-often with varying degrees of success [715]. For example, based on their ability to promote survival and growth in neuronal populations [16], neurotrophic factors have been extensively pursued as a possible disease-modifying treatment for Parkinson’s disease (PD) [2, 710, 17]. Although preclinical studies have supported the efficacy of intraparenchymally infused neurotrophic factors into the nigrostriatal system of parkinsonian animal models [1826]; clinical trials examining the direct, surgical infusion of neurotrophic factors into targeted regions of the basal ganglia system have failed to meet primary end points [9, 1215, 27, 28]. This lack of clinical efficacy has been strongly attributed to insufficient biodistribution and/or bioavailability following direct infusion into the brain [2, 79, 17, 29]. While additional efforts have been explored to improve distribution and/or bioavailability to key pathophysiological regions of the CNS following direct, surgical infusion [9, 3034], optimal delivery methodologies for neurotrophic factors have yet to be identified [2, 79, 17, 33]. Therefore, new avenues need to be examined that overcome challenges associated with delivering large MW compounds to the brain for the treatment of chronic, progressive neurodegenerative diseases and disorders [1, 2, 9]. One possible alternative strategy currently under investigation is the discovery and development of new neuroactive compounds [3538] that can potentially be delivered to the CNS using non-invasive routes of administration, such as intranasal delivery [1, 39].

An emerging body of preclinical [3948] and clinical [4952] evidence supports the intranasal delivery of compounds as a viable, non-invasive alternative route of administration that can potentially bypass the BBB and BCSFBs-directly targeting compounds to the CNS and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [50, 5254]. Several preclinical studies have attributed the rapid nose-to-brain transport of intranasally-administered compounds to a combination of extracellular pathways including: perineural transport associated with the olfactory and trigeminal nerves, perivascular delivery by way of the cerebral vasculature, and perilymphatic system [1, 53, 5557]. However, the majority of intranasal studies investigating nose-to-brain transport mechanisms and/or the effects of neuroactive compounds on the CNS, have been conducted in rodents [58, 59]. While the importance of these studies should not be underestimated, differences in rodent nasal anatomy [53, 56, 57, 5961] and the typical use of sedation to optimize intranasal dosing to the olfactory region [59, 62], may limit the translation of rodent studies into the clinic [58, 59, 63]. For example, our team has reported on the neuroactive effects of the synthetic, amidated 11-amino acid neuroactive peptide, DNSP-11 (dopamine neuron stimulating peptide-11) following repeated intranasal delivery in rats [39]. However, the repeated use of light isoflurane sedation as chemical restraint appeared to enhance the toxicity of the 6-OHDA nigrostriatal lesion [39, 64]. Therefore, the development of intranasal dosing methodologies, amenable to repeated dosing paradigms in awake (unanesthetized) non-human primates (NHP), which are anatomically comparable to the human brain and olfactory system [5861], remains a critical step in the preclinical evaluation of neuroactive compounds intended for the treatment of chronic, progressive neurodegenerative diseases and disorders such as PD [58, 63].

Here we report an intranasal dosing methodology, using an atomizer in awake NHPs that can be implemented to evaluate the effects of neuroactive compounds, such as DNSP-11, on the brain following prolonged, repeated intranasal dosing. In this proof-of-concept study, Rhesus macaques were administered DNSP-11 (or vehicle) intranasally 4 consecutive days-per-week, with escalation of the DNSP-11 dose (0, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, 10.0 mg/day) occurring biweekly over the course of 10-weeks. This dosing strategy allowed us to examine striatal target engagement, safety and tolerability of repeated dosing and dose-escalation, and brain distribution following a single 125I-labeled DNSP-11 dose. Our data support that the repeated intranasal delivery and dose-escalation of DNSP-11 resulted in bilateral, target engagement based on changes in striatal tissue levels of DA and DA metabolites: 3,4– dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA). In addition, there were no observable behavioral effects or weight loss following repeated intranasal delivery. Finally, we observed that DNSP-11 is rapidly transported to the CNS following a single, bilateral intranasal dose-as evident from a 125I-DNSP-11 distribution study. Collectively, these results demonstrate that DNSP-11 can be safely delivered intranasally at various concentrations over an extended period of time in awake NHPs, while maintaining its neuroactive properties in the striatum [39].

2.0 Methods

2.1. Ethics statement & animals

The animal facility at the University of Kentucky strictly follows the guidelines set by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and are fully accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC), with veterinarians experienced in the healthcare of NHPs. All animal use protocols were approved by the University of Kentucky Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), and strictly followed by research staff. For this proof-of-concept study, six, non-research naïve female Rhesus macaques (10–18 yr, 4–8 kg; Covance, Alice, TX) were used. NHPs were individually housed at the University of Kentucky animal facility and maintained on a 12 hr light/dark cycle in temperature and humidity-controlled rooms, with food provided twice daily and water available ad libitum. It should be noted that the NHPs used in the present studies were acquired from another study, which excluded them based on a lower level of hemiparkinsonian symptoms following intracarotid artery (right side) infusion with MPTP (0.12–0.17 mg/kg, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) (data not shown) [65]. NHPs recovered for a minimum of 3 months following surgical MPTP infusion as previously reported, ensuring lesion stability prior to vertical-chair training [65, 66].

2.2. Materials

Unless stated otherwise, all chemicals were of reagent grade and purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) or Thermo Fisher Scientific (Pittsburg, PA). 125I-DNSP-11 was synthesized using a modified, active (R9K) sequence for iodination by the Bolton-Hunter method, and purified > 95 % pure by RP-HPLC (Perkin Elmer, North Billerica, MA), as described previously [39]. For dose-escalation studies, DNSP-11 was dissolved in vehicle (0.9 % saline, pH 7.2–7.4, Hospira, Inc. Lake Forest, IL), and shown to be stable in vitro [37]. All sample preparations were blinded from those performing animal dosing.

2.3. Portable atomizer system

To repeatedly deliver DNSP-11 intranasally in awake NHPs over an extended period of time, we developed and calibrated a portable system comprised of a commercially available glass atomizer (DeVilbiss, DV-151; Summit Medical, St. Paul, MN). The atomizer was driven by compressed, medical grade N2 and controlled by a timed pressure ejection system (Picospritzer III; Parker; Pine Brook, NJ), paralleling previously reported intranasal studies in NHPs [47]. The Picospritzer III allowed for precise regulation of both pressure (PSI) and duration (sec) of a single intranasal spray burst (PSI/sec). Based on similar studies in NHPs [62, 67], a volume of 207 µl ± 10 % (1 × per naris) was used. To accurately deliver the designated volume, the Picospritzer III was set at 16 PSI for 1 sec. However, the deposition of the atomizer has not been characterized and will need to be determined in future studies.

2.4. Vertical chair-training and acclimation to intranasal dosing

Prior to the start of training exercises, NHPs were fitted with a hard nylon collar (Primate Products, Inc., Immokalee, FL) used to secure a NHP to a modified, custom-fabricated vertical chair for intranasal dosing (Figure 1A & B) [68, 69]. Chair-training and atomizer acclimation in NHPs occurred over the course of 2–4 weeks, with individual training sessions lasting approximately 15–30 min. To facilitate training, NHPs received veterinary approved positive reinforcement in the form of dietary enrichment and audio-visual entertainment. Training sessions began through the introduction of a primate pole (Primate Products, Inc., Immokalee, FL) into an NHP’s home cage, later advancing to attachment of the pole to the NHP’s hard nylon collar used for transport [69]. NHPs were then introduced to the vertical chair and familiarized to an attachable head restraint apparatus comprised of a foam wedge placed under the NHP’s mandible (Figure 1A & B). Acclimation to the head restraint apparatus and foam wedge was a critical stage in the training period as it allowed for the gentle restraint of the NHP’s head at an approximate 45° angle during intranasal administration (Figure 1B) [53, 62]. Atomizer training sessions began by dosing each NHP with vehicle only, in strict accordance with our intranasal dosing procedure (see section 2.5.).

Figure 1. Intranasal dosing of awake, chair-trained NHPs using an atomizer.

Figure 1

For daily intranasal dosing, (A) NHPs were placed in a custom-fabricated vertical chair and secured. Prior to intranasal dosing, a head restraint with mandibular stabilizer (foam wedge) was used to secure and lift the NHP’s head approximately 45°. (B) Each NHP received an intranasal dosing using an atomizer. The atomizer was equipped with a rubber stopper to aid in positioning the tip of the medical applicator directly in front of the NHP’s nostril, while helping to align the metal applicator with the bridge of the NHP’s nose. The atomizer was connected to a Picospritzer III (not pictured), allowing for the regulation of both duration (sec) and pressure (PSI) of the atomized spray.

2.5. Procedure of intranasal administration in awake Rhesus macaques

Intranasal dosing occurred between 09:00 – 11:00 in a designated humidity and temperature-controlled procedure room. Prior to intranasal dosing, NHPs received veterinary-approved positive reinforcement (see section 2.4.), while acclimating to their surroundings for approximately 5 min. Following acclimation, the NHP’s head was placed in a head restraint apparatus with mandibular foam stabilizer (Figure 1A & B) [53, 62]. For intranasal dosing, the atomizer was primed by 4 consecutive test sprays. Immediately following atomizer priming, the NHP was administered the first intranasal dose (Figure 1B). A 5 min absorption period was then observed while the NHP’s head remained in the angled position, the atomizer was then re-primed and the second intranasal dose administered to the opposite naris (Figure 1B). It should be noted that the atomizer was equipped with a rubber stopper which aided in positioning the nozzle directly in front of the NHP’s naris for dosing, while helping to align the metal applicator tube with the NHP’s nasal bridge (Figure 1B).

2.6. Experimental timeline

As parameters for a biologically relevant DNSP-11 dose and intranasal dosing paradigm had yet to be established in NHPs, we examined half-log step above the biologically active dose (0.3 mg) found in rats [39], adjusted for changes in brain mass between species [53, 62]. DNSP-11-treated NHPs (n=3) were administered test article 4 consecutive days-per-week, with escalation in DNSP-11 dose (0, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, and 10.0 mg) occurring biweekly over 10-weeks (Figure 2). The control group (n=3) received only vehicle using the same dosing paradigm (Figure 2). To document general health over the course of the study, NHPs were monitored in their home cages approximately 60 min following the start of the first intranasal dose (t=0), as previous studies have indicated rapid systemic absorption and CNS uptake of various compounds in NHPs [45, 53] and DNSP-11 rats [39]. Monitoring sessions were recorded using a SONY HandyCam Vision Camera (SONY P6-120 MPL; data not shown). In addition, body weight measurements were collected at the end of each dosing week (Figure 2). At the end of the 10-week dosing period, NHPs were administered the final intranasal dose under anesthesia prior to tissue collection.

Figure 2. Experimental timeline: illustration representing a typical biweekly dosing sequence.

Figure 2

Over the course of 10-weeks, NHPs received either vehicle or DNSP-11 (0, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, 10.0 mg/day), 4 consecutive days-per-week with escalation in DNSP-11 dose occurring biweekly-day 15 marks the start of the next dosing sequence. Additionally, body weight measurements were taken on days 5 and 12 (non-dosing day).

2.7. Tissue processing

NHPs were anesthetized with an initial dose of ketamine hydrochloride (10–20 mg/kg, Fort Dodge), laid supine with the head titled back 45°, and administered a terminal intranasal dose of either DNSP-11 (10 mg) or vehicle, while under light isoflurane anesthesia (2% with 1% O2). To determine brain and systemic distribution, one DNSP-11-treated NHP received iodinated (125I) DNSP-11 (5 mCi/10 mg DNSP-11; 2.5 mCi/5 mg DNSP-11 per naris). To administer the 125I-labeled DNSP-11 dose, proper personal protective equipment was worn, and dosing was completed in a fume hood, in accordance with radiation safety protocols. Following the start of the first 125I-labeled intranasal dose (t=0), 1.0 mL of blood was collected from the saphenous vein in 15 min intervals to determine rate of systemic absorption into the bloodstream. Approximately 60 min following the start of the first intranasal dose (t=0), 0.5 mL cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was collected by lumbar puncture and NHPs were then deeply anesthetized (5 % isoflurane with 1 % O2) and administered a fatal dose of sodium pentobarbital (250–300 mg, intravenously, Vortech, Dearborn, Michigan, MI) as previously described [66]. Prior to transcardial perfusion, 5.0 mL of urine aspirated from the bladder. NHPs were then transcardialy perfused with ice-cold heparinized saline (4 ml heparin/4 L of 0.9 % saline). Brain tissue was then harvested and weighed (wet-weight) for neurochemical, gamma counting and autoradiography analyses. Whole brains were immediately processed into 2 mm-thick serial, coronal sections using a brain mold kept on wet-ice that had been stored at 4°C in 0.9 % saline (Baxter, Deerfield, IL).

2.8. Neurochemical analyses of the Rhesus macaque striatum

For neurochemical analysis, brain sections that contained the striatum were laid flat on a piece of foam padding placed over dry ice [66]. Multiple 2 mm-diameter biopsy punches were collected from the right and left striatum: putamen (n = 9 per hemisphere), caudate nucleus (n = 4 – 5 per hemisphere), nucleus accumbens (n = 1 per hemisphere) and globus pallidus (n = 2 – 3 per hemisphere) for analysis by HPLC-EC (Figure 4) as previously described [66]. Biopsy punches were placed in pre-weighed 1.5 ml protein LoBind eppendorf tube (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), weighed (wet-weight), flash frozen with dry ice and stored at −70 °C. Biopsy punches were processed for dopamine (DA), 3,4 –dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC), and homovanillic acid (HVA). Samples were separated using an isocratic HPLC system (ESA-Dionex: Thermo Fisher Scientific, Pittsburg, PA) coupled to a dual-channel electrochemical array detector (Coulochem III; 5100A, E1 +0.35 mV and E2 −0.25 mV with a 5011 dual analytical cell). Separation of DA and DA metabolites was achieved using a C18 column (4.6 mm × 75 mm, 3 µm particle size, ODS Hypersil; Keystone Scientific) with mobile phase (5 % MeOH, citrate-acetate, pH 4.0) [70]. Average tissue levels of DA, DOPAC and HVA were determined by combing tissue punches for specific striatal regions.

Figure 4. Distribution of 125I signal in the brain 60 min following a single, one-time 125I-labled DNSP-11 dose.

Figure 4

125I signal was determined by autoradiography analysis in 2-mm thick serial, coronal brain slabs. 2-mm thick coronal brain sections were exposed to film for 24 hours on a GE cassette and processed using a Typhoon 9400 (GE Health Care). Based on visual, qualitative assessment the highest 125I was present in the olfactory tracts (A–G). Additionally, an increase in 125I signal was present in the white matter regions of the brain (A–T) including the corpus callosum (A–J) and the internal capsule (G–I). Black box indicates brain slabs used for neurochemical analysis (G, I & K). Circles represent tissue punches taken for gamma counting or neurochemical analysis.

2.9. Gamma counting and autoradiographic analysis

The olfactory bulbs (right & left), trigeminal nerves (right & left) and pituitary gland were harvested for gamma counting analysis following transcardial perfusion. Additionally, multiple, 2 mm-diameter biopsy punches for gamma counting analysis were collected from the frontal, motor and occipital cortices (6 punches per cortical area/hemisphere), caudate nucleus (4 punches per hemisphere), putamen (6 punches per hemisphere), globus pallidus (2 punches per hemisphere), nucleus accumbens (1 punch per hemisphere), amygdala (1 punch per hemisphere) and cerebellum (6 punches per hemisphere) (Figure 4). All samples were individually placed in pre-weighed 12 × 75 mm polypropylene disposable culture tubes (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA), weighed (wet-weight) and placed on wet-ice for immediate gamma counting analysis. Samples (fluid, whole tissue, biopsy punch) were analyzed using a Perkin-Elmer Cobra II Gamma Counter (Packard; preset energy range 15 to 75 KeV, 1 min runtime) to detect total 125I signal (counts-per-min, CPM). To determine the average CPM signal for specific regions of the CNS, the olfactory bulbs, trigeminal nerves and tissue punches were combined. CPM values were then normalized (CPM/mg or CPM/100 µl) to determine average 125I signal. For autoradiography analysis, 2-mm thick serial, coronal brain slices were placed in a GE autoradiography cassette and exposed to film for 24 hr, and then visualized using a Typhoon 9400 phosphorimager (GE Health Care).

2.10. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 6 Software (La Jolla, CA). Prior to statistical analysis, the average tissue levels of DA and DA metabolites in the putamen, caudate nucleus, nucleus accumbens and globus pallidus were determined for both the contralateral and MPTP-lesioned striatum of DNSP-11 and vehicle-treated NHPs by HPLC-EC. Neurochemicals (analyte and/or DA turnover) of the contralateral striatum were analyzed using an unpaired two-tailed t test *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01. However, variations in lesion severity were apparent in both DNSP-11 and vehicle-treated NHPs following neurochemical analysis of the MPTP-lesioned striatum. Therefore, NHPs were categorized based on the percent depletion of DA in in the MPTP-lesioned putamen compared to the contralateral putamen (Table 2). Based on the small sample size, statistical analysis of the MPTP-lesioned striatum was withheld, and qualitative assessments made to compare neurochemical content and turnover ratios (Table 2).

Table 2. Tissue levels of DA, DOPAC, HVA and corresponding DA turnover [(DOPAC+HVA)/DA], DOPAC/DA, HVA/DA in the contralateral striatum following repeated intranasal delivery and DNSP-11 dose-escalation.

Average tissue levels of DA and DA metabolites of the contralateral and MPTP-lesioned striatum of vehicle and DNSP-11-treated NHPs. For neurochemical analysis, tissue punches were harvested and weighted (wet weight) from the putamen (n = 9 per hemisphere), caudate nucleus (n = 4 – 5 per hemisphere), nucleus accumbens (n = 1 per hemisphere) and globus pallidus (n = 2 – 3 per hemisphere) over three 2 mm-thick coronal tissue sections, see Figure 4 for tissue punch mapping. Average tissue levels of DA, DOPAC and HVA were determined by combining tissue punches for a specific striatal region (ng/g wet tissue weight). All data were analyzed using an unpaired two-tailed t test

Neurochemical Analysis of the Left or Contralateral Striatum (N=3 per group)
DA DOPAC HVA [(DOPAC
HVA)/DA]
+ DOPAC/DA HVA/DA
Putamen
Vehicle 23801 ± 3998 3282 ± 590 27377 ± 698 1.40 ± 0.20 0.15 ± 0.05 1.30 ± 0.19
DNSP-11 21359 ± 2343 1339 ± 110 * 20429 ± 1323 ** 1.42 ± 0.10 0.09 ± 0.01 1.34 ± 0.10
p=0.6261 p=0.0317 p=0.0097 p=0.9234 p=0.2402 p=0.8384
t(4)=0.5270 t(4)=0.3.240 t(4)=4.696 t(4)=0.1023 t(4)=1.378 t(4)=0.2176
Caudate Nucleus
Vehicle 27601 ± 3785 3183 ± 299 19906 ± 1043 0.98 ± 0.21 0.13 ± 0.03 0.85 ± 0.19
DNSP-11 22304 ± 1569 1449 ± 183 ** 15040 ± 1174 * 0.78 ± 0.04 0.07 ± 0.01 0.72 ± 0.03
p=0.2657 p=0.0078 p=0.0363 p=0.4113 p=0.1045 p=0.5398
t(4)=0.1293 t(4)=4.947 t(4)=3.097 t(4)=0.9165 t(4)=2.092 t(4)=0.6696
Nucleus Accumbens
Vehicle 12572 ± 2681 3705 ± 165 25436 ± 1094 2.48 ± 0.40 0.31 ± 0.05 2.17 ± 0.36
DNSP-11 11790 ± 837 2024 ± 151 ** 22344 ± 1460 2.07 ± 0.09 0.17 ± 0.02* 1.90 ± 0.07
p=0.7946 p=0.0017 p=0.1654 p=0.3744 p=0.0494 p=0.5021
t(4)=0.2782 t(4)=7.510 t(4)=1.695 t(4)=0.9988 t(4)=2.788 t(4)=0.7368
Globus Pallidus
Vehicle 373 ± 17 79 ± 8 10744 ± 276 30.00 ± 1.75 0.22 ± 0.03 29.80 ± 1.72
DNSP-11 411 ± 73 45 ± 17 8445 ± 335 ** 22.30 ± 2.70 0.10 ± 0.02* 22.20 ± 2.72
p=0.6404 p=0.1473 p=0.0061 p=0.0745 p=0.0223 p=0.0774
t(4)=0.5043 t(4)=1.794 t(4)=5.298 t(4)=2.399 t(4)=3.623 t(4)=2.364
*

p < 0.05

**

p < 0.01.

Data are presented as the mean ± SEM.

3.0. Results

3.1. Effects of DNSP-11 on striatal tissue levels of DA and DA metabolites

MPTP-treatment was seen to result in robust decreases in tissue levels of DA and DA metabolites ipsilateral to the treatment side in most of the MPTP-treated animals that were treated with vehicle or DNSP-11 (Table 1). The unilateral lesion approach in this study, directly targeting the nigrostriatal system in the right hemisphere of the brain, provided an important opportunity to observe the effects of DNSP-11 on injured dopaminergic circuitry and the more normal contralateral hemisphere (Table 2). Dopamine neurons in the substantia nigra that innervate the putamen and caudate nucleus are especially vulnerable to MPTP neurotoxicity, while dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area innervating the nucleus accumbens are more resilient [20]. This pattern is evident in the two DNSP-11 recipients with moderately severe putamenal and caudate DA depletions of ~80–90% (Table 1). Effects on the nucleus accumbens and globus pallidus were less severe, ranging from ~56–68% (Table 1). When compared to the two vehicle recipients with DA depletions in the right putamen and caudate nucleus, the DNSP-11 recipients showed [(DOPAC + HVA)/DA] ratios 3.8 to 2.6 times higher indicating DNSP-11 was increasing dopamine turnover in these striatal areas (Table 1). Dopamine depletion in the nucleus accumbens and globus pallidus was markedly less severe with [(DOPAC + HVA)/DA] ratios 0.8 to 1.5 times higher than in the two comparable vehicle recipients (Table 1). By contrast, one vehicle treated animal had a very extensive depletion of DA of >99% and one MPTP-treated animal had greater levels of DA following DNSP-11 treatment. The present study used animals that were known to have variable DA depletions as this study was a proof of concept design to develop the nasal delivery approach. Thus, the one animal that showed much higher levels of DA and DA metabolites post DNSP-11 intranasal treatment may be attributed to a target activation effect and/or a poorer MPTP-induced lesion. Further studies with larger numbers of animals with more uniform depletion by DA and metabolites by MPTP are needed to better understand the in vivo effects of nasal delivery of DNSP-11.

Table 1. MPTP lesion categories of vehicle and DNSP-11-treated NHPs based on DA depletion of the lesioned putamen.

NHPs were categorized with groups designated as mild (< 80%; N=1 DNSP-11-treated), moderate (80–90%; N=2 DNSP=11; N=2 vehicle-treated), or severe (> 99%; N=1 vehicle-treated), with respect to total DA depletion when comparing the MPTP-lesioned (right) putamen to the contralateral (left) putamen. Data are presented as the mean.

Neurochemical Analysis of the Right or Ipsilateral striatum (MPTP-treated; N=3 per group)
Vehicle N = 2
~80% DA loss
DNSP-11 N = 2
~90% DA loss
Vehicle N = 1
> 99% DA loss
DNSP-11 N = 1
< 20% DA loss
Putamen
DA 3280 1679 203 17862
DOPAC 570 257 63 1688
HVA 12573 8567 3102 21794
[(DOPAC + HVA)/DA] 4.50 17.18 60.22 1.44
Caudate Nucleus
DA 4614 1546 79 25570
DOPAC 526 236 37 1912
HVA 8266 5283 1353 17684
[(DOPAC + HVA)/DA] 2.16 5.69 42.95 0.80
Nucleus Accumbens
DA 3740 3025 1490 10592
DOPAC 915 759 657 2601
HVA 15960 11721 8636 25540
[(DOPAC + HVA)/DA] 4.98 4.14 10.73 2.66
Globus Pallidus
DA 133 138 260 303
DOPAC 64 17 39 22
HVA 5313 8893 26 9103
[(DOPAC + HVA)/DA] 25.11 37.21 10.73 30.39

By contrast, there was clear evidence of target activation of the DA neuronal system on the contralateral hemisphere (Table 2). Changes in DA, DA metabolites and DA turnover ratios were present in the contralateral striatum between DNSP-11 (n=3) and vehicle-treated (n=3) groups (Table 2). Tissue levels of DA in the putamen, caudate nucleus, and globus pallidus were not significantly affected in the DNSP-11-treated group compared to vehicle (Table 2). By contrast, reductions in DOPAC were seen in the putamen, caudate nucleus and nucleus accumbens by 59% (p=0.0317*), 54% (p=0.0078**), and 45% (p=0.0017**), respectively (Table 2). In addition, a reduction in tissue-levels of HVA were found in the putamen, caudate nucleus and globus pallidus by 25% (p=0.0097**), 24% (p=0.0363*), and 21% (p=0.0061**), respectively, in the DNSP-11-treated group compared to vehicle (Table 2).

Due to the low numbers of animals studied, DA turnover ratios were also examined to investigate an index of changes in DA function [71]. In the contralateral striatum, DA turnover [(DOPAC + HVA)/DA] was unchanged in the DNSP-11-treated NHPs compared to vehicle (Table 2). However, DOPAC/DA turnover ratios in nucleus accumbens and globus pallidus were significantly reduced by 12% (p=0.0494*) and 56% (p=0.0223*), respectively, of the DNSP-11-treated group compared to vehicle controls (Table 2). Thus, additional studies are needed but our current studies support that nasal administration of DNSP-11 produced effects on the DA neuronal system.

3.2. Cage-side observations following repeated intranasal delivery and dose-escalation of DNSP-11

To determine safety and tolerability of prolonged, repeated intranasal delivery of DNSP-11 in awake NHPs, DNSP-11 was administered in a dose-escalating manner (Figure 2). Over the course of 10-weeks there were no observable indications of acute epistaxis, gastrointestinal associated irritation, adverse neurological symptoms, such as seizure or dyskinesia, or other general behavioral side-effects documented during daily cage-side observations (data not shown). Additionally, DNSP-11 and vehicle-treated NHPs did not show significant changes in average body weight (≤ 5%) over the course of the 10-week study (Supplemental Figure 1). These results parallel our previous rodent studies in that there were no reported cases of adverse side-effects or significant changes in average body weight associated with repeated intranasal administration or dose-escalation of DNSP-11 [39].

3.3. Radiolabel distribution following a single, terminal intranasal 125I-labeled DNSP-11 dose

To determine brain distribution, CSF and systemic absorption following intranasal delivery of DNSP-11 using our intranasal dosing method, we treated one NHP with a single intranasal dose of 125I-labeled DNSP-11 in vehicle (5 mCi/10 mg DNSP-11; 2.5 mCi/5 mg/0.5 mL per naris). Quantitative gamma counting analysis of CSF (Table 3) and biopsied brain tissue samples revealed the presence of 125I signal 60 min following the start of the intranasal dosing (t=0) (Figure 3), with the greatest normalized (cpm/mg) 125I signal present in the olfactory bulbs and trigeminal nerves (Figure 3). Qualitative autoradiography analysis of serial, coronal brain slices corroborated these findings, as there was visibly greater 125I signal present in the lateral olfactory tracts (Figure 4A–G) when compared to all other brain regions (Figure 4A–T). In addition, the pituitary gland, a circumventricular organ inherently exposed to the systemic circulation, showed a 2-fold increase in normalized 125I signal (cpm/mg) compared to the olfactory bulbs (Figure 3) [72]. These data provide supporting evidence for a direct nose-to-brain route of transport, paralleling similar intranasal distribution studies in NHPs (Figure 3) [45].

Table 3. CSF, peripheral tissue and blood 125I levels 60 min following a single, one-time 125I-labled DNSP-11 dose.

125I signal was present in CSF, the thyroid gland, urine and blood samples as analyzed by gamma counter (Perkin-Elmer Cobra II Gamma Counter: Packard; preset energy range 15 to 74 KeV, 1 min runtime). Blood samples were taken from the saphenous vein in 15 min intervals following the start of the first intranasal dose (t=0). Data are presented as total 125I signal (CPM) and normalized 125I signal (CPM/mg). NHPs treated with vehicle only were found to have CPM values lower than background levels ≤ 50 cpm (data not shown).

Samples CPM (Counts Per Min) Normalized CPM/mg
CNS
CSF 2530 25
Peripheral Samples
Thyroid Gland 8181000 15480
Urine 1984500 19845
Blood Samples
15 min 77850 779
30 min 89160 892
45 min 96970 970
60 min 99700 997

Figure 3. Brain tissue levels of 125I 60 min following a single, one-time 125I-labeled DNSP-11 dose.

Figure 3

Multiple 2 mm-diameter tissue punches were taken of the frontal cortex (n = 12), motor cortex (n = 12), occipital cortex (n = 12), caudate nucleus (n = 8), putamen (n = 12), accumbens (n = 2), globus pallidus (GP, n = 4), amygdala (n = 2) and cerebellum (n = 12), see Figure 4 for tissue punch mapping. Additionally, the olfactory bulbs and trigeminal nerves were harvested for gamma counting analysis (Perkin-Elmer Cobra II Gamma Counter: Packark; preset energy range 15 to 74 KeV, 1 min runtime). Data are presented as the mean (left and right hemispheres) normalized 125I signal (CPM/mg-wet tissue weight) ± SEM. NHPs treated with vehicle only were found to have CPM values lower than background levels ≤ 50 cpm (data not pictured).

Analogous to our prior 125I-labeled DNSP-11 distribution studies in rats, gamma counting and autoradiography analysis revealed diffuse rostral to caudal distribution in all brain tissue samples examined (Figure 3 & Figure 4A–T), including the striatum (putamen, caudate nucleus, nucleus accumbens and globus pallidus), which is our target region of interest (Figure 3 & 4F–L). Heavy deposits of radiolabeled signal were also found surrounding the ventricles (Figure 4) and major white matter tracks of the brain-most notably in the corpus callosum (Figure 4D–J), and striatal afferent and efferent motor fibers (Figure 4G–I). These data further support the rapid distribution of DNSP-11 throughout the NHP brain following intranasal administration [55].

To determine the rate of 125I-labeled DNSP-11 systemic absorption into the bloodstream as a function of time, blood samples were collected from the saphenous vein at 15, 30, 45 and 60 min following the start of the first intranasal dosing (t=0). As expected, 125I signal was present at all examined time points, with the greatest 125I signal observed at 60 min (Table 3). Additionally, 125I signal was found in both urine and thyroid gland samples, further supporting systemic absorption and clearance following intranasal delivery while also denoting the presence of free/unbound 125I in the periphery [73].

4.0. Discussion

One of the major hurdles in the development of long-term treatment strategies for PD and similar CNS neurodegenerative disorders has been the targeted delivery of large MW compounds, such as GDNF, to the brain [2, 5, 9, 17, 52]. While several strategies have emerged to overcome challenges associated with delivering compounds across the BBB [30, 32, 69, 74, 75]; the potential use of GDNF and other neurotrophic factors as a treatment for PD has yet to be realized, in part because of suboptimal delivery to the basal ganglia system [2, 9, 29]. One strategy to circumvent this challenge is to discover and develop smaller, functional neuroactive compounds [3538] that are amenable to non-invasive delivery methods [39]. Our team has previously described the in vitro and in vivo neuroprotective and restorative properties of DNSP-11 [3537], that can engage the nigrostriatal system following repeated intranasal dosing in normal F344 rats and in a unilateral 6-OHDA rat model of PD [39]. However, findings from our rat study indicated the repeated use of light isoflurane sedation for intranasal dosing may have enhanced the toxicity of the nigrostriatal lesion [39, 64]. Therefore, we developed an methodology to examine the effects of intranasally delivered neuroactive compounds, such as DNSP-11, without the need for sedation in Rhesus macaques-a preclinical model anatomically comparable to the human olfactory system and brain [58, 60]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first demonstration to indicate that the prolonged, repeated intranasal delivery and dose-escalation of DNSP-11 results in bilateral, striatal target engagement based on neurochemical changes in DA and DA metabolites, and a lack of observable, adverse behavioral effects or weight loss in MPTP-treated NHPs. Furthermore, a single 125I-labeled DNSP-11 study provides evidence supporting direct intranasal transport.

To determine neurochemical target engagement, DA, DA metabolites (DOPAC & HVA) and DA turnover ratios were examined in the contralateral and MPTP-lesioned striatum. Here we report a general pattern indicating a reduction in DA metabolites and DA turnover ratios in the contralateral striatum of DNSP-11-treated NHPs compared to vehicle controls. Compensatory effects from the MPTP-lesions and crossover of MPTP are known to occur using with intra-carotid artery administration of MPTP in nonhuman primates [18, 20, 23]. We found decreases in tissue levels of DOPAC & HVA and DA turnover ratios that we currently interpret as a normalization of the compensatory effects of the MPTP treatment, which can augment DA turnover [18, 20, 23]. Suppression of DA and its metabolites has also been observed at higher doses of GDNF in NHPs [76] and rats [24] following direct brain injection. Interestingly, the present study indicates wide-spread reductions in DA metabolites and DA turnover ratios found in all examined regions of the contralateral striatum in DNSP-11-treated NHPs when compared to vehicle and possible effects on DA systems ipsilateral to the lesion. These results are in contrast to previous studies in NHPs in which GDNF was infused into the putamen by CED, indicating a lack of neurochemical effects to areas of the striatum outside of the distribution volume area [29, 66, 77]. Collectively, neurochemical data support bilateral effects on the striatal system following repeated intranasal delivery and dose-escalation of DNSP-11 compared to vehicle in MPTP-treated Rhesus macaques. These results parallel our previous striatal neurochemical findings in normal and 6-OHDA treated rats following repeated intranasal delivery of DNSP-11 [39]. However, additional studies with greater statistical power are needed to better understand the effects of nasal administration of DNSP-11 in both normal and unilateral MPTP-treated nonhuman primates.

Prior studies examining the transport of select compounds to the brain of NHPs and humans following intranasal delivery have demonstrated rapid uptake into the CSF and/or distribution into the brain in under 30 min [1, 45, 50, 52, 53]. Rapid intranasal transport has been attributed to a combination of paracellular mechanism including: 1) perineural transport associated with the trigeminal and/or olfactory nerves found mainly in the olfactory region of the nasal cavity, 2) perivascular delivery-powered by bulk flow through the propulsion of atrial blood and diffusion, and/or 3) perilymphatic transport to the cervical lymph nodes [1, 53, 56]. In the present study, 125I analysis of CSF and brain samples indicated the presences of radioactive signal 60 minutes post-intranasal dosing. 125I signal was found in the olfactory bulbs and trigeminal nerves, and diffusely though out the brain, including the major white matter tracks (Figure 3 & 4)-supporting anisotropic movement of DNSP-11 [78]. In addition, 125I signal was present at lower levels in grey matter regions (Figure 4), supporting rapid cellular uptake, paralleling previously published studies in rats examining direct intraparenchymal infusion and uptake of DNSP-11 into the nigrostriatal system [35]. When taken together, our study provides evidence supporting the direct nose-to-brain transport of DNSP-11 following intranasal delivery, consistent with our 125I-DNSP-11 studies in normal rats [39] and similar studies in NHPs [45].

125I analysis also indicated rapid systemic absorption of the radio-tracer within 15 min after intranasal administration, and showed a steady increase in 125I signal over time (Table 3). This data is similar to our previous intranasal 125I-DNSP-11 studies in normal rats [39] and similar studies in NHPs [45]. While the possibility of DNSP-11 crossing the BBB following absorption into the bloodstream after intranasal delivery exists, it is unlikely as the half-life data of DNSP-11 in NHP plasma has been shown to be < 10 min as analyzed by LC-MS/MS (data not shown). Furthermore, the pituitary gland, a circumventricular organ where the BBB is more permeable, had a higher normalized 125I signal compared to all other biopsied brain tissue samples examined, including the olfactory bulbs and trigeminal nerves-providing evidence supporting a direct nose-to-brain route [45, 72]. Although our intranasal 125I-labeled DNSP-11 study supports rapid absorption into the systemic circulation, peripheral tissues and the brain, cage-side monitoring and body weight measurements support that the prolonged and repeated intranasal administration of DNSP-11 or vehicle did not lead to observable behavioral adverse side effects. In addition, we cannot estimate the concentration of DNSP-11 that is achieved from these data. Additional studies are needed to determine the dosage and to optimize the deposition [45] for achieving the in vivo brain concentrations necessary for the desired pharmacological effects by the nasal delivery method.

As this was a proof-of-concept study to implement our intranasal dosing methodology to examine the effects of DNSP-11 in awake NHPs, an optimal DNSP-11 dose and intranasal dosing regimen had yet to be determined. Therefore, future studies with larger numbers of animals will be needed to determine an optimal DNSP-11 dose and intranasal dosing regimen, and to investigate the neurochemical contribution of other anatomical relevant neuronal populations, such as the substantia nigra, as 125I signal was found diffusely throughout the brain. In addition, studies in other lesion and/or aged NHP models may help to evaluate the impact of intranasally delivered DNSP-11 on damaged DA neuronal populations.

In summary, this proof-of-concept study supports the utility of our intranasal dosing methodology to evaluate the effects of neuroactive compounds in awake Rhesus macaques, a preclinical model comparable to the human brain and olfactory system [50, 60]. Furthermore, results from this study provide evidence supporting bilateral, striatal target engagement based on neurochemical changes in DA and DA metabolites-without observable, behavioral adverse side effects or weight loss following repeated intranasal delivery or dose-escalation of DNSP-11 in MPTP-treated Rhesus macaques. Additionally, a 125I-labeled DNSP-11 study indicated rapid tracer uptake into CSF and diffuse distribution of 125I signal in the brain-providing supporting evidence of nose-to-brain transport. Collectively, this study supports the further investigation of intranasally delivered DNSP-11 in preclinical NHP models of PD, and demonstrates the importance of evaluating the long-term outcome of intranasally delivered neuroactive compounds intended for the treatment of chronic, progressive CNS disorders such as PD.

Supplementary Material

supplement

Highlights.

  • DNSP-11 was repeatedly delivered intranasally in awake Rhesus over 10-weeks.

  • Neurochemical analysis of the striatum provided evidence for target engagement.

  • No observed behavioral side-effects following repeated delivery or dose-escalation.

  • Evidence supports direct nose-to-brain transport after a single dose.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Samuel Deadwyler of Wake Forest School of Medicine for his helpful conversations, and Matt Hazzard and Tom Dolan of the University of Kentucky Academic Technology Group for helping with the medical illustrations used in Figures 1 & 4.

Funding

This project was supported by funds from NINDS: (NS039787: all; NS060924: L.H.B.), NCATS (UL1TR000117: L.H.B., G.A.G.), NIA (AG013494: D.M.G., G.A.G.; T32-AG000242: J.T-C., M.J.S.), Kentucky INBRE Pilot (NCRR 5P20RR016481-12, NIGMS 8P20GM103436-12: L.H.B), NIH COBRE pilot (NCRR P20RR20171: L.H.B), Endowed Chair Funds (D.M.G.), Dupree Trust (G.A.G), Estate of Laura C. Miller (L.H.B), PhRMA Foundation (L.H.B.), Columbus Foundation (L.H.B.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of the NIH. The sponsors had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Abbreviations

BBB

blood-brain barrier

BCSFC

blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier

CED

convection-enhanced delivery

CNS

central nervous system

CSF

cerebrospinal fluid

CPM

counts per min

DA

dopamine

DOPAC

3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid

DNSP-11

dopamine-neuron stimulating peptide-11

GDNF

glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor

GFR

GDNF-family receptor

HPLC-EC

high performance liquid chromatography with electrical chemical detection

HVA

homovanillic acid

MPTP

1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine hydrochloride

MW

molecular weight

NHP

non-human primate

OB

olfactory bulb

OSN

olfactory sensory neuron

PD

Parkinson’s disease

RP-HPLC

reverse phase-high performance liquid chromatography

SN

substantia nigra

6-OHDA

6-hydroxydopamine

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Disclosure

These results have not been published in any peer-reviewed journal. L.H.B., D.M.G., and G.A.G. declare two awarded patents and two pending patent applications regarding DNSP-11.

References

  • 1.Thorne R, Frey W., II Delivery of Neurotrophic Factors to the Central Nervous System. Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 2001;40(12):907–946. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200140120-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sullivan AM, O’Keeffe GW. Neurotrophic factor therapy for Parkinson’s disease: past, present and future. Neural regeneration research. 2016;11(2):205. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.177710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tachikawa M, et al. Recent Progress in Blood–Brain Barrier and Blood–CSF Barrier Transport Research: Pharmaceutical Relevance for Drug Delivery to the Brain. In: Hammarlund-Udenaes M, de Lange ECM, Thorne RG, editors. Drug Delivery to the Brain: Physiological Concepts, Methodologies and Approaches. Springer New York; New York, NY: 2014. pp. 23–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wolak DJ, Thorne RG. Diffusion of Macromolecules in the Brain: Implications for Drug Delivery. Molecular Pharmaceutics. 2013;10(5):1492–1504. doi: 10.1021/mp300495e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pardridge WM. The Blood-Brain Barrier: Bottleneck in Brain Drug Development. NeuroRX. 2005;2(1):3–14. doi: 10.1602/neurorx.2.1.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Patel MM, Patel BM. Crossing the Blood–Brain Barrier: Recent Advances in Drug Delivery to the Brain. CNS drugs. 2017:1–25. doi: 10.1007/s40263-016-0405-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bartus RT, Johnson EM. Clinical tests of neurotrophic factors for human neurodegenerative diseases, part 1: where have we been and what have we learned? Neurobiology of disease. 2017;97:156–168. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2016.03.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bartus RT, Johnson EM. Clinical tests of neurotrophic factors for human neurodegenerative diseases, part 2: Where do we stand and where must we go next? Neurobiology of disease. 2017;97:169–178. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2016.03.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Obeso JA, et al. Past, present, and future of Parkinson’s disease: A special essay on the 200th Anniversary of the Shaking Palsy. Movement Disorders. 2017;32(9):1264–1310. doi: 10.1002/mds.27115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Peterson AL, Nutt JG. Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease with Trophic Factors. Neurotherapeutics. 2008;5(2):270–280. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2008.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Siegel GJ, Chauhan NB. Neurotrophic factors in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease brain. Brain Research Reviews. 2000;33(2):199–227. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0173(00)00030-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Slevin John T, et al. Unilateral intraputamenal glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in patients with Parkinson disease: response to 1 year of treatment and 1 year of withdrawal. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2007;106(4):614–620. doi: 10.3171/jns.2007.106.4.614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Slevin John T, et al. Improvement of bilateral motor functions in patients with Parkinson disease through the unilateral intraputaminal infusion of glial cell line—derived neurotrophic factor. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2005;102(2):216–222. doi: 10.3171/jns.2005.102.2.0216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gill SS, et al. Direct brain infusion of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in Parkinson disease. Nature medicine. 2003;9(5):589–595. doi: 10.1038/nm850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lang AE, et al. Randomized controlled trial of intraputamenal glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor infusion in Parkinson disease. Annals of neurology. 2006;59(3):459–466. doi: 10.1002/ana.20737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lin L, et al. GDNF: a glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor for midbrain dopaminergic neurons. Science. 1993;260(5111):1130–1132. doi: 10.1126/science.8493557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hegarty SV, et al. Effects of intracerebral neurotrophic factor application on motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders. 2017;38:19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gash DM, et al. Trophic factor distribution predicts functional recovery in parkinsonian monkeys. Annals of neurology. 2005;58(2):224–233. doi: 10.1002/ana.20549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Grondin R, et al. Peptide Transport and Delivery into the Central Nervous System. Springer; 2003. Intracranial delivery of proteins and peptides as a therapy for neurodegenerative diseases; pp. 101–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gash DM, et al. Functional recovery in parkinsonian monkeys treated with GDNF. Nature. 1996;380(6571):252. doi: 10.1038/380252a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kearns CM, et al. GDNF Protection against 6-OHDA: Time Dependence and Requirement for Protein Synthesis. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1997;17(18):7111–7118. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-18-07111.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kearns CM, Gash DM. GDNF protects nigral dopamine neurons against 6-hydroxydopamine in vivo. Brain Research. 1995;672(1):104–111. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)01366-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Grondin R, et al. Intraputamenal Infusion of Exogenous Neurturin Protein Restores Motor and Dopaminergic Function in the Globus Pallidus of MPTP-Lesioned Rhesus Monkeys. Cell Transplantation. 2008;17(4):373–381. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hoffer BJ, et al. Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor reverses toxin-induced injury to midbrain dopaminergic neurons in vivo. Neuroscience Letters. 1994;182(1):107–111. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(94)90218-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kirik D, Rosenblad C, Björklund A. Preservation of a functional nigrostriatal dopamine pathway by GDNF in the intrastriatal 6-OHDA lesion model depends on the site of administration of the trophic factor. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2000;12(11):3871–3882. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00274.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rosenblad C, et al. Protection and regeneration of nigral dopaminergic neurons by neurturin or GDNF in a partial lesion model of Parkinson’s disease after administration into the striatum or the lateral ventricle. European Journal of Neuroscience. 1999;11(5):1554–1566. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00566.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Marks WJ, et al. Gene delivery of AAV2-neurturin for Parkinson’s disease: a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet Neurology. 2010;9(12):1164–1172. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70254-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Marks WJ, et al. Safety and tolerability of intraputaminal delivery of CERE-120 (adeno-associated virus serotype 2-neurturin) to patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: an open-label, phase I trial. The Lancet Neurology. 2008;7(5):400–408. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70065-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Salvatore MF, et al. Point source concentration of GDNF may explain failure of phase II clinical trial. Experimental Neurology. 2006;202(2):497–505. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kordower JH, et al. Neurodegeneration Prevented by Lentiviral Vector Delivery of GDNF in Primate Models of Parkinson’s Disease. Science. 2000;290(5492):767–773. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5492.767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kordower JH, et al. Clinicopathological findings following intraventricular glial-derived neurotrophic factor treatment in a patient with Parkinson’s disease. Annals of Neurology. 1999;46(3):419–424. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(199909)46:3<419::aid-ana21>3.0.co;2-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bankiewicz K, et al. Translational Neuroscience. Springer; 2016. GDNF and AADC Gene Therapy for Parkinson’s Disease; pp. 65–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sherer TB, et al. Crossroads in GDNF therapy for Parkinson’s disease. Movement disorders. 2006;21(2):136–141. doi: 10.1002/mds.20861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kordower JH, Bjorklund A. Trophic Factor Gene Therapy for Parkinson’s Disease. Movement Disorders. 2013;28(1):96–109. doi: 10.1002/mds.25344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bradley LH, et al. Dopamine Neuron Stimulating Actions of a GDNF Propeptide. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(3):e9752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fuqua JL, et al. Dynamic changes in dopamine neuron function after DNSP-11 treatment: Effects in vivo and increased ERK 1/2 phosphorylation in vitro. Peptides. 2014;54(0):1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2013.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kelps KA, et al. Evaluation of the physical and in vitro protective activity of three synthetic peptides derived from the pro- and mature GDNF sequence. Neuropeptides. 2011;45(3):213–218. doi: 10.1016/j.npep.2011.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bradley LHG, Don M, Gerhardt, Greg A. Amidated Dopamine Neuron Stimulating Peptides for CNS Dopaminergic Upregulation. Neuroscience Faculty Patents. 2017;10 [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Stenslik MJ, et al. Methodology and effects of repeated intranasal delivery of DNSP-11 in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 2015;251:120–129. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Banks WA, During MJ, Niehoff ML. Brain Uptake of the Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Antagonist Exendin(9–39) after Intranasal Administration. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 2004;309(2):469–475. doi: 10.1124/jpet.103.063222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dhuria SV, Hanson LR, Frey WH. Intranasal drug targeting of hypocretin - 1 (orexin - A) to the central nervous system. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2009;98(7):2501–2515. doi: 10.1002/jps.21604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gozes I, et al. Activity-Dependent Neurotrophic Factor: Intranasal Administration of Femtomolar-Acting Peptides Improve Performance in a Water Maze. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 2000;293(3):1091–1098. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Migliore MM, et al. Neurotrophic and neuroprotective efficacy of intranasal GDNF in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience. 2014;274(0):11–23. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ross TM, et al. Intranasal administration of interferon beta bypasses the blood-brain barrier to target the central nervous system and cervical lymph nodes: a non-invasive treatment strategy for multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neuroimmunology. 2004;151(1–2):66–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2004.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Thorne RG, et al. Delivery of interferon-β to the monkey nervous system following intranasal administration. Neuroscience. 2008;152(3):785–797. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Thorne RG, et al. Delivery of insulin-like growth factor-I to the rat brain and spinal cord along olfactory and trigeminal pathways following intranasal administration. Neuroscience. 2004;127(2):481–496. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.05.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Deadwyler SA, et al. Systemic and nasal delivery of orexin-A (Hypocretin-1) reduces the effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance in nonhuman primates. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2007;27(52):14239–14247. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3878-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yue P, et al. Intranasal Administration of GDNF Protects Against Neural Apoptosis in a Rat Model of Parkinson’s Disease Through PI3K/Akt/GSK3β Pathway. Neurochemical Research. 2017;42(5):1366–1374. doi: 10.1007/s11064-017-2184-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Craft S, et al. Effects of Regular and Long-Acting Insulin on Cognition and Alzheimer’s Disease Biomarkers: A Pilot Clinical Trial. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease. 2017:1–10. doi: 10.3233/JAD-161256. (Preprint) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Born J, et al. Sniffing neuropeptides: a transnasal approach to the human brain. Nature neuroscience. 2002;5(6):514. doi: 10.1038/nn849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Parker KJ, et al. Intranasal oxytocin treatment for social deficits and biomarkers of response in children with autism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017;114(30):8119–8124. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705521114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chapman C, et al. Intranasal Treatment of Central Nervous System Dysfunction in Humans. Pharmaceutical Research. 2013;30(10):2475–2484. doi: 10.1007/s11095-012-0915-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lochhead JJ, Thorne RG. Intranasal delivery of biologics to the central nervous system. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2012;64(7):614–628. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2011.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hanson LR, Frey WH. Intranasal delivery bypasses the blood-brain barrier to target therapeutic agents to the central nervous system and treat neurodegenerative disease. BMC Neuroscience. 2008;9(3):S5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-9-S3-S5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lochhead JJ, et al. Rapid transport within cerebral perivascular spaces underlies widespread tracer distribution in the brain after intranasal administration. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. 2015;35(3):371–381. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kumar NN, et al. Relative vascular permeability and vascularity across different regions of the rat nasal mucosa: implications for nasal physiology and drug delivery. Scientific reports. 2016;6:31732. doi: 10.1038/srep31732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lochhead JJ, Thorne RG. Intranasal Drug Delivery to the Brain. In: Hammarlund-Udenaes M, de Lange ECM, Thorne RG, editors. Drug Delivery to the Brain: Physiological Concepts, Methodologies and Approaches. Springer New York; New York, NY: 2014. pp. 401–431. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Graff CL, Pollack GM. Nasal drug administration: potential for targeted central nervous system delivery. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2005;94(6):1187–1195. doi: 10.1002/jps.20318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Illum L. Nasal Delivery. The Use of Animal Models to Predict Performance in Man. Journal of Drug Targeting. 1996;3(6):427–442. doi: 10.3109/10611869609015963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gizurarson S. Animal models for intranasal drug delivery studies. A review article. Acta pharmaceutica Nordica. 1990;2(2):105–122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Harkema JR, Carey SA, Wagner JG. The Nose Revisited: A Brief Review of the Comparative Structure, Function, and Toxicologic Pathology of the Nasal Epithelium. Toxicologic Pathology. 2006;34(3):252–269. doi: 10.1080/01926230600713475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Dhuria SV, Hanson LR, Frey WH., 2nd Intranasal delivery to the central nervous system: mechanisms and experimental considerations. J Pharm Sci. 2010;99(4):1654–73. doi: 10.1002/jps.21924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Barchet TM, Amiji MM. Challenges and opportunities in CNS delivery of therapeutics for neurodegenerative diseases. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery. 2009;6(3):211–225. doi: 10.1517/17425240902758188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Datla K, Zbarsky V, Dexter D. Effects of anaesthetics on the loss of nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons by 6-hydroxydopamine in rats. Journal of neural transmission. 2006;113(5):583–591. doi: 10.1007/s00702-005-0353-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ding F, et al. Development of a stable, early stage unilateral model of Parkinson’s disease in middle-aged rhesus monkeys. Experimental Neurology. 2008;212(2):431–439. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.04.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Grondin R, et al. Chronic, controlled GDNF infusion promotes structural and functional recovery in advanced parkinsonian monkeys. 2002;125:2191–2201. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Djupesland PG. Nasal drug delivery devices: characteristics and performance in a clinical perspective—a review. Drug delivery and translational research. 2013;3(1):42–62. doi: 10.1007/s13346-012-0108-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Zhao F, et al. Improved methods for electroacupuncture and electromyographic recordings in normal and parkinsonian rhesus monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 2010;192(2):199–206. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.07.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Andersen AH, et al. Functional MRI studies in awake rhesus monkeys: Methodological and analytical strategies. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 2002;118(2):141–152. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0270(02)00123-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Hall M, Hoffer B, Gerhardt G. Rapid and sensitive determination of catecholamines in small tissue sample by HPLC coupled with dual electrode coulometric electrochemical detection. LCGC. 1989;7:258–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Zigmond MJ, et al. Compensations after lesions of central dopaminergic neurons: some clinical and basic implications. Trends in Neurosciences. 1990;13(7):290–296. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(90)90112-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Gross PM. Chapter 31: Circumventricular organ capillaries. In: Armin Ermisch RL, Hans-Joachim R, editors. Progress in Brain Research. Elsevier; 1992. pp. 219–233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Sodoyez JC, Sodoyez-Goffaux FR, Moris YM. 125I–insulin: kinetics of interaction with its receptors and rate of degradation in vivo. 1980;239:E3–E8. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1980.239.1.E3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Fiandaca MS, et al. Image-guided convection-enhanced delivery platform in the treatment of neurological diseases. Neurotherapeutics. 2008;5(1):123–127. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2007.10.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kirik D, et al. Gene therapy for Parkinson’s disease: Disease modification by GDNF family of ligands. Neurobiology of Disease. 2017;97:179–188. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2016.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Zhang Z, et al. Dose Response to Intraventricular Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Administration in Parkinsonian Monkeys. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 1997;282(3):1396–1401. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Ai Y, et al. Intraputamenal infusion of GDNF in aged rhesus monkeys: Distribution and dopaminergic effects. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2003;461(2):250–261. doi: 10.1002/cne.10689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Syková E, Nicholson C. Diffusion in Brain Extracellular Space. 2008;88:1277–1340. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00027.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supplement

RESOURCES