Skip to main content
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine logoLink to Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
. 2018 May 23;14:37. doi: 10.1186/s13002-018-0234-7

Ethnozoological study of traditional medicinal appreciation of animals and their products among the indigenous people of Metema Woreda, North-Western Ethiopia

Fasil Adugna Kendie 1,, Sileshi Andualem Mekuriaw 1, Melkamu Andargie Dagnew 1
PMCID: PMC5967044  PMID: 29792196

Abstract

Background

Using animals for different purposes goes back to the dawn of mankind. Animals served as a source of food, medicine, and clothing for humans and provided other services. This study was designed to undertake a cross-sectional ethnozoological field survey among the residents of Metema Woreda from November 2015 to May 2016.

Methods

Data were collected through studied questionnaires, interviews, and focus group discussions with 36 purposively selected respondents.

Results

Ethnozoological data were collected of the local name of the animals, part of the animal used, mode of preparation and administration, and of additional information deemed useful. A total of 51 animal species were identified to treat around 36 different ailments. Of the animals used therapeutically, 27 species were mammals, 9 were birds, 7 arthropods, 6 reptiles, and 1 species each represented fish and annelids. Furthermore, the honey of the bee Apis mellifera was used to relieve many ailments and scored the highest fidelity value (n = 35.97%). The snake (Naja naja) and the teeth of crocodiles (Crocodylus spp.) had the lowest fidelity value (n = 2.56%).

Conclusion

The results show that there is a wealth of ethnozoological knowledge to be documented which could be of use in developing new drugs. Hence, it is hoped that the information contained in this paper will be useful in future ethnozoological, ethnopharmacological, and conservation-related research of the region.

Keywords: Traditional medicine, Indigenous knowledge, Ethnozoology, Zootherapy

Background

Using animals for different purposes goes back to the dawn of mankind. Animals served as a source of food, medicine, and clothing for humans and provided other services [1]. The traditional medicinal knowledge of indigenous people across the globe has played an important role in identifying living organisms which are endowed with medicinal values important for treating human and livestock health problems. Since ancient times, animals and their products have been used in the preparation of traditional remedies in various cultures [2]. Human societies have accumulated a vast store of knowledge about animals through the centuries, which is closely integrated with many other cultural aspects, and this zoological knowledge is an important part of our human cultural heritage [3].

The cure for human ailments using therapeutics from animals is known as zootherapy [4]. It plays a significant role in the healing practices, magic rituals, and religious societies all over the world [5, 6]. In the modern era, zootherapy constitutes a major alternative among many other known therapeutic practices in the world. Wild as well as domestic animals and their by-products such as hooves, skins, bones, feathers, and tusks serve as important ingredients in the preparation of curative, protective, and preventive medicines [5, 7, 8].

Traditional medicines have been important in connection with drugs like digitoxin, reserpine, tubocurarine, and ephedrine [9]. Of the 252 essential chemicals that have been selected by the World Health Organization, 8.7% come from animals [10].

Loss of traditional knowledge of indigenous communities had impact the development of modern medicine. It is important to document the traditional knowledge of human communities, since the majority of such communities are losing their socioeconomic and cultural characteristics [10]. Animals and the products derived from their body organs constitute part of the inventory of medicinal substances which are used widely by the people since time immemorial, and such practices still exist in traditional medicines [10]. Traditional healing methods involving hundreds of insect and other invertebrate species are reviewed by Meyer-Rochow [11]. In South Africa, animals and plants are commonly used as traditional medicines for both the healing of ailments and for symbolic purposes such as improving relationships and attaining good fortune [12].

In Traditional Chinese Medicine, more than 1500 animal species had been recorded to be some medicinal use [13]. In Brazil, Alves and Rosa reported the medicinal use of 283 animal species for the treatment of various ailments [1417].

In Ethiopia, 70% of human and 90% of livestock population depend on traditional medicine. Although Ethiopians are known for their widespread use of traditional medicines with various levels of sophistication within the indigenous medical lore, the vast knowledge of the traditional uses of animal species of therapeutic value is not well documented for the various regions of the country. Moreover, since most of the knowledge is conveyed along generations through word of mouth, the traditional knowledge as well as the products used by these people is under threat [18].

In Metema Woreda, there were a number of studies about ethnobotany and traditional medicine, diversity, and floristic compositions of plants. However, despite the great diversity of ethnic groups and cultures in this area, ethnozoological studies of traditional medicinal animals have not yet been sufficiently addressed. Metema Woreda is characterized by the presence of a mosaic of ethnic groups with deep rooted culture of using traditional medicinal plants and animals. Hence, this study is aimed to explore ethnozoology and preparations of animals and its products as traditional medicine used to cure different human and animal ailments.

Methods

Study area description

The study was conducted in Metema Woreda in the Amhara National Regional State. The Woreda is about 333 km to the North West of Bahir Dar, the Capital City of Amhara Regional State. Metema is one of the Woredas in the Semien Gondar Zone, bordered by Qwara in the south, Sudan in the west, Mirab Armachiho in the north, Tach Armachiho in the northeast, Chilga in the east, and Takusa in the southeast. The Woreda constitutes a total of 20 Peasant Kebele administrations, of which 18 are rural-based peasant administration areas [19, 20]. The Woreda is the home of many ethnic groups including Agaw, Tigrie, Oromo, Gumuz, and Amhara migrated from the different angles of the country for different reasons displaying a diversity of cultures and indigenous belief.

Selection of study sites

A preliminary study was conducted in November 2015 to select specific study sites in the Woreda and test data collection tools. The study was conducted in six kebeles of Metema Woreda (Birshign; Kokit; Mender 6, 7, and 8; Metema Yohannis; Aftit; and Meka) from November 2015 to May 2016. These kebeles were purposively selected based on the availability of many traditional healers, presence of different ethnic groups, and accessibility of the area.

Sampling and data collection

The ethnozoological data (local name of animals, mode of preparation and administration, and part of the animal used) were collected through questionnaires, interviews, and focus group discussion with selected residents of Metema Woreda. Purposively, 36 key informants were selected, and questionnaires, interviews, and focus group discussion were made within these informants [21]. These informants were local herbalists, traditional healers, farming experts, midwives, and spiritual intellectuals. The selections of key informants were based on their experience and recognition as knowledgeable members concerning traditional zootherapeutics (the so called expert by the local people) [22]. Different types of ethnozoological data were collected from each type of key informants.

Group discussion

Brief group discussions were made at each site prior to the distribution of detailed questionnaires on the importance of animals in traditional medicine and related issues with the selected informants of the study site. During the discussions, an attempt was made to encourage the healers in such a way that their cooperation would be of benefit to the country and at same time an informed consent was obtained before data collection.

Semi-structured interviews

A semi-structured checklist and interview questions were prepared in advance. The interviews were based on this checklist, and some issues were raised promptly depending on the responses of an informant. The interview was held in Amharic, the language of the people by the researchers. The place and time for the discussion was set based on the interest of the informants.

Informant consensus

During the course of the study, each informant was visited three times in order to confirm the reliability of the ethnozoological information. Consequently, the responses of an informant that were not in harmony with each other were rejected since they were considered as unreliable information.

Animal specimen collections and identifications

The local names and associated attributes of medicinal animals were recorded for each of the species. The specimens with its common name, photograph, dead skin, hair, fur, and some products were collected and taken to Bahir Dar University (BDU) for species identification. Identification of the medicinal animals was done in BDU, using Internet and animal key by comparison with collected plates and illustrations.

Data analysis

The data obtained were summarized and analyzed using descriptive statistical methods. In the ethnozoological data that were obtained from the interviews on reported medicinal animals and associated knowledge, fidelity level (FL) was calculated as the percentage of respondents claiming the use of a certain animal species for the same ailments, for the most frequently reported diseases or ailments as

FL%=Np100/N

where Np is the number of respondents that claim a use of a species to treat a particular disease and N is the number of respondents that use the animals as a medicine to treat any given disease [23]. The range of fidelity level (FL) is from 1 to 100%; high values indicate that this particular animal species is used by large number of people, while a low value shows that respondents disagree on the usefulness of a species in treating ailments.

Results

This study revealed the traditional medicinal knowledge of treating various kinds of ailments using different animals and their parts/products by local inhabitants of different kebeles of Metema Woreda (North-Western Ethiopia). Many people were found to lack formal schooling education, but they have knowledge about the use of local animal resources for traditional medicines.

Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents such as sex, age, educational level, and marital status were collected and presented (Table 1).

Table 1.

Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents

Basic information Number of respondents Percentage (%)
Sex
 Male 34 94.4
 Female 2 5.6
Age
 35–44 years 6 16.7
 45–60 years 20 55.5
 > 60 years 10 27.8
Educational level
 Illiterate 15 41.7
 Literate 21 58.3
Marital status
 Married 34 94.4
 Single 1 2.8
 Divorced 1 2.8

Information regarding the way to acquire traditional medicinal knowledge, duration of time to use traditional medicine, the reason that forces the people to use traditional medicines, categories of people that use traditional medicine, the outlooks of people about the use of traditional medicine, conservation, and documentation mechanisms of traditional medicinal animals were gathered from all respondents (Table 2).

Table 2.

Information that was acquired by close-ended questionnaire

No. Questions Choices No. of respondents Percentage (%)
1 Where did you learn traditional medicinal knowledge? A) Family 16 44.4
B) Books 4 11.1
C) Surrounding society 12 33.3
D)Experience 4 11.1
Total 36
2 How many times people use traditional medicines? A) Sometimes 15 41.7
B) Always 13 36.1
C) Situational 8 22.2
Total 36
3 What was the reason that forces the people to use traditional medicines? A) Economy 7 19.4
B) Lack of modern medicine 10 27.8
C) Effectiveness 19 52.8
Total 36
4 Which categories of people use traditional medicines in large quantity? A) Ethnic group 5 13.9
B) Nations 1 2.8
C) Religion 5 13.9
D) All 25 69.4
Total 36
5 What looks like the outlooks of people about use of traditional medicines? A) Good 15 41.7
B) Bad 1 2.8
C) Intermediate 20 55.5
Total 36
6 Are there any conservation and documentation mechanisms of traditional medicinal animals? A) Yes 3 8.3
B) No 31 86.1
C) Some 2 5.5
Total 36

Fifty-one animal species (Table 5) were found to be used for the treatment of over 36 kinds of ailments. There were 27 species belonging to mammals, 9 to birds, 7 arthropods, 6 reptiles, and 1 each among the fish and annelid (Table 3).

Table 5.

Mode of application/administrations of traditional medicines

No. Mode of application No. of application Percentage (%) Mode of entry
1 Eating 30 28.0 Oral
2 Drinking 27 25.2 Oral
3 Tying 18 16.8 Not enter
4 Anointing 14 13.1 Dermal
5 Banding 6 5.6 Dermal
6 Massaging 6 5.6 Dermal
7 Fumigation 3 2.8 Nasal
8 Heating 3 2.8 Dermal

Table 3.

Animal groups and number of species used for traditional medicine in the study area

No. Animal groups Number of species Percentage (%)
1 Mammals 27 52.9
2 Birds 9 17.6
3 Reptiles 6 11.8
4 Fish 1 2
5 Arthropods 7 13.7
6 Annelid 1 2

The animals and their parts/products were found to be used for the treatment of around 36 different kinds of ailments including rheumatism, malaria, wart, stomachache, toothache, herpes, headache, rabies, tuberculosis, anemia, trachoma, gastritis, asthma, paralysis, and cough. The animals were used as whole or their products like milk, blood, organ, meat, teeth, and honey for the treatment of various ailments (Table 8).

Table 8.

Medicinal animals, parts/products used, and their fidelity level

Animal group Common name Scientific name Parts/product used Ailments treated No. of respondents claimed (n) Fidelity level (FL) Mode of applications
Mammals Wild boar Sus scrofa Meat Rheumatism, syphilis, stomachache, and malaria 32 89 Eating
Common warthog Phacochoerus africanus Teeth Swelling, toothache, wart and rheumatism 26 72 Heating
Blood Malaria, asthma, and rheumatism 12 33 Drinking
Skin Herpes 4 11 Anointing
Bile AIDS 8 22 Drinking
Horn Swelling 4 11 Heating
Cow Bos taurus Butter Malaria and paralysis 8 22 Eating
Milk Rabies and TB 18 50 Drinking
Urine Malaria 4 11 Drinking
Spleen Anemia, malaria and trachoma 13 36 Eating
Omasum Gastritis 4 11 Eating
Liver Anemia 9 25 Eating
Blood Wart 10 28 Drinking
Cheetah Acinonyx jubatus Skin Hemorrhage 3 8 Tying
Camel Camelus dromedarius Milk Headache, rheumatism, malaria and diarrhea 20 56 Drinking
Porcupine Hystrix spp. Meat Swelling, TV, headache, AIDS, asthma, rheumatism, gastritis, and hypertension 24 67 Eating
Bile Asthma/diabetes, stomach scramble 11 31 Drinking
Stomach/intestine Diarrhea and diabetes 7 19 Eating
Thorn/spine Wound and broken leg 14 39 Tying
Liver Diabetes disease 3 8 Eating
Human Homo sapiens Stool Wart 3 8 Anointing
Donkey Equus africanus asinus L. Milk Measles, cough, trachoma/rabies, and internal problem 22 61 Drinking
Rat Rattus spp. Meat Intestinal disease 5 14 Eating
Foot Nightmare 4 11 Tying
Blood Wart 6 17 Anointing
Spotted hyna Crocuta crocuta Bone Epilepsy and bad spirit 12 33 Tying
Skin Protection from evil eye and during labor 9 25 Tying
Bile Erythroblastosis and nightmare 8 22 Tying
Liver Infection of skin 5 14 Banding
Skin For communicable diseases and bad spirit 11 31 Tying
Meat For swollen sex organ, epilepsy and anemia 5 14 Eating
Gazelle Gazella spp. Urine For urination problem 23 64 Drinking
Bile Syphilis 0 Drinking
Goat Capra aegagrus hircus L. Milk Eye disease, gastritis, wound, headache, measles, TB, eye disorder, vomiting, snake poison, and rheumatism 27 75 Drinking
Fat Wound and Toothache 16 44 Banding
Liver Trachoma 7 19 Massaging
Butter Headache and ear infection 8 22 Massaging
Hippopotamus Hippopotamus amphibius Bone Breast swelling, sunburn, and body fracture 6 17 Banding, drinking
Pig Sus scrofa Meat Rheumatism and headache 4 11 Eating
Blood Skin infection 4 11 Anointing
Monitor lizard Varanus spp. Skin Infant communicable disease 6 17 Tying
Sheep Ovis aries Milk Malaria 4 11 Drinking
Olive baboon Papio anubis Hind skin/skin Broken/misplaced bone and wound/burning 9 25 Tying
Meat Rabies prevention for dogs and HIV/AIDS 13 36 Eating
Bile, meat AIDS 6 17 Eating, drinking
Cat Felis domesticus Skin Spiritual problem 3 8 Tying
Elephant Elephas maximus Bile Kidney failure 3 8 Drinking
Bone Herpes and diarrhea 6 17 Massaging
Ivory Herpes 3 8 Anointing
Urine Herpes, urination disorder 3 8 Drinking
Skin Herpes, back pain, skin wound, and trachoma 6 17 Anointing
Bear Melursus ursinus Bile Epilepsy 4 11 Drinking
Vervet monkey Chlorocebus pygerythrus Meat For STDs, anemia for children 3 8 Eating
Common fox Canis spp. Brain tissue and meat Epilepsy, mental disorder 4 11 Eating/drinking
Bile Toothache, eye problem, and internal problem 2 5.6 Drinking
Giraffe Giraffa camelopardalis Urine and milk TB 3 8 Drinking
Dog Canis familaries Bone Epilepsy 3 8 Tying
Ethiopian hare Lepus fagani Excreta Soars/wound 4 11 Anointing
Meat Cattle disorder, epilepsy 8 22 Fumigation, drinking
Fat Wart 5 14 Anointing
Groundhog Marmota monax Meat For coughing and fattening baby 7 19 Eating
Bat Cynopterus sphinx Meat Hepatitis, mental disorder 21 58 Eating
Birds Vulture Gyps spp. Leg Epilepsy 3 8 Fumigation
Meat Mental disorder 4 11 Eating
Pigeon Columba livia Meat Mental disorder, body fracture, and heart failure 12 33 Eating
Duck Duck spp. Meat TB 4 11 Eating
Ostrich Struthio camelus Meat and egg Muscle strain and broken bone and paralysis 4 11 Massaging, anointing
Hen Gallus gallus domesticus Whole body For physical injury and wound 9 25 Drinking
Liver and fat Swelling wound, pneumonia 16 44 Eating
Osprey Pandion haliaetus Bone Epilepsy, body fracture 5 14 Tying
Erckel’s francolin Pternistis erckelii Meat Internal problem 3 8 Eating
Bile STDS 3 8 Drinking
Red billed Oxpecker Buphagus erythrorhynchus Blood Skin fungus 4 11 Anointing
Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Blood Skin fungus 4 11 Anointing
Reptiles Snake Naja naja Coat Headache 2 5.6 Tying
Venom Malaria and snake bite 4 11 Anointing
Head Diarrhea, evil eye, and headache 6 17 Tying
Crocodile Crocodylus spp. Bile Coughing, TB, teeth rheumatism 4 11 Drinking Anointing
Bone Communicable disease 3 8 Tying
Teeth Epilepsy 2 5.6 Tying
Python Python spp. Bone Rabies and swelling 3 8 Tying and Banding
Tail and bone Cancer and swelling 3 8 Banding
Fat Wound and ear disease 7 19 Banding,
Meat Rabies, foot crack, and ear disorder 13 36 Eating, anointing
Tortoise Testudo graeca Teeth Swelling 3 8 Heating
Shell Trypanosomiasis, nose bleeding 6 17 Fumigation
Chameleon Chamaeleo chamaeleon Whole body Cancer, body fattening 6 17 Tying
Lizard Lacertilia spp. Whole body Dry cough and anemia 3 8 Drinking
Fish Fish Any fish spp. Meat Rheumatism 4 11 Eating
Bile Eye disorder 3 8 Eating
Arthropods Scorpion Palamnaeus swammerdami Meat Scorpion bite 6 17 Massaging
Bee Apis mellifera Honey Wart, asthma, diarrhea, throat pain, stomachache, cough, TB, mumps, heart failure 35 97 Eating, drinking
Larvae Stomach disorder 3 8 Drinking
Termite (Queen) All spp. Whole body Fattening of livestock 3 8 Eating
Field cricket Gryllus campestris Whole body Eye disease 3 8 Eating
Gnat (small insect) All spp. Honey Stomachache, eye disorder, and coughing 13 36 Eating
Bumble bee Bombus spp. Honey Coughing, malaria, and stomachache 3 8 Eating
Ticks All tick spp. Blood Fungal disease on the skin 3 8 Anointing
Annelid Leeches All spp. Head Rheumatism 3 8 Massaging

According to the data (Table 4), meat/fat was the most widely used medicinal parts/products of animals in traditional medicine, followed by visceral organs, products and bone/teeth, and external body parts with similar percentages. On the other hand, an animal’s whole body and excreta, and blood were found to be the least used medicinal parts/products of animals.

Table 4.

Animal parts or products used to traditional medicine in the study area

No. Medicinal parts/products of animals No. of parts/products used Percentage (%)
1 Meat/fat 23 23.5
2 Visceral organ (liver, spleen, Bile, stomach/intestine) 21 21.4
3 Products (honey, venom, milk, butter) 13 13.3
4 Bone/teeth 12 12.2
5 External Body part (head, tail, leg, skin, horn, spine/thorn) 12 12.2
6 Excreta (stool and urine) 6 6.1
7 Whole body 6 6.1
8 Blood 5 5.1

In the study area, different parts or products of animals were used to treat different types of ailments. The highest number of cow parts or products 8 (3.8%) used to treat 8 (4.5%) ailments. The second rank was occupied by common warthog (Phacochoerus africanus), porcupine (Hystrix spp.), spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta), and elephant (Elephas maximus) with similar number of parts/products 5 (2.5%) and used to treat 8 (4.5%), 13 (7.5%), 11 (6.2%), and 7 (3.9%) ailments, respectively (Table 5).

Preparations varied according to ailment and involved cooking, burning, crushing/grinding, wrapping, powdering, and drying or the use of fresh animal parts/products (Table 6).

Table 6.

Medicinal animals and their parts/products used and number of ailments treated

Animal group Common name Local name Scientific name No. of parts/products used No. of ailments treated
N (%) N (%)
Mammals Wild boar Ria Sus scrofa 1 (0.5) 4 (2.2)
Common warthog Kerkero Phacochoerus africanus 5 (2.5) 8 (4.5)
Cow Lam Bos taurus 8 (3.9) 8 (4.5)
Cheetah Aboshemane Acinonyx jubatus 1 (0.5) 1 (0.6)
Camel Gimel Camelus dromedaries 1 (0.50 4 (2.2)
Porcupine Jart Hystrix spp. 5 (2.5) 13 (7.3)
Human Sew Homo sapiens 1 (0.5) 1 (0.6)
Donkey Ahiya Equus africanus asinus L. 1 (0.5) 5 (2.8)
Rat Ayti Rattus spp. 3 (1.5) 3 (1.7)
Spotted hyna Gib Crocuta crocuta 5 (2.5) 11 (6.2)
Gazelle Agazen Gazella spp. 2 (1.0) 2 (1.1)
Goat Fiyel Capra aegagrus hircus L. 4 (2.0) 12 (6.7)
Hippopotamus Gumare Hippopotamus amphibius 1 (0.5) 3 (1.7)
Pigs Asama Sus scrofa domesticus 2 (1.0) 3 (1.7)
Monitor lizard Arjano Varanus spp. 1 (0.5) 1 (0.6)
Sheep Beg Ovis aries 1 (0.5) 1 (0.6)
Olive baboon Zingero Papio anubis 3 (1.5) 4 (2.2)
Cat Dimet Felis domesticus 1 (0.5) 1 (0.6)
Elephant Zihon Elephas maximus 5 (2.5) 7 (3.9)
Bear Dib Melursus ursinus 1 (0.5) 1 (0.6)
Vervet monkey Tota Chlorocebus pygerythrus 1 (0.5) 2 (1.1)
Common fox Kebero Canis spp. 2 (1.0) 5 (2.8)
Giraffe Kechinie Giraffa camelopardalis 2 (1.0) 1 (0.6)
Dog Wusha Canis familaries 1 (0.5) 1 (0.6)
Ethiopian hare Tinchel Lepus fagani 3 (1.5) 4 (2.2)
Groundhog Shikoko Marmota monax 1 (0.5) 1 (0.6)
Bat Yelelit wof Cynopterus sphinx 1 (0.5) 2 (1.1)
Birds Vulture Timb ansa Gyps spp. 2 (1.0) 2 (1.1)
Pigeon Ergib Columba livia 1 (0.5) 3 (1.7)
Duck Dackye Duck spp. 1 (0.5) 1 (0.6)
Ostrich Segon Struthio camelus 3 (1.5) 3 (1.7)
Hen Dero Gallus gallus domesticus 3 (1.5) 4 (2.2)
Osprey Gedie Pandion haliaetus 1 (0.5) 2 (1.1)
Erckel’s francolin Koki Pternistis erckelii 2 (1.0) 2 (1.1)
Red billed oxpecker Arechi Buphagus erythrorhynchus 1 (0.5) 1 (0.6)
Bald eagle Chilat Haliaeetus leucocephalus 1 (0.5) 1 (0.6)
Reptiles Snake Ebab Naja naja 3 (1.5) 6 (3.4)
Crocodile Azo Crocodylus spp. 3 (1.5) 5 (2.8)
Python Zendo Python spp. 4 (2.0) 7 (3.9)
Tortoise Ali Testudo graeca 1 (0.5) 2 (1.1)
Chamaleon Esist Chamaeleo chamaeleon 1 (0.5) 1 (0.6)
Lizard Enshilalit Lacertilia spp. 1 (0.5) 2 (1.1)
Fish Fish Assa Any fish spp. 2 (1.0) 2 (1.1)
Arthropods Scorpion Ginti Palamnaeus swammerdami 1 (0.5) 1 (0.6)
Bees Nib Apis mellifera 2 (1.0) 13 (7.3)
Termite (Queen) Mist All spp. 1 (0.5) 1 (0.6)
Field cricket Fenta Gryllus campestris 1 (0.5) 1 (0.6)
Gnat (small insect) Tinign All spp. 1 (0.5) 3 (1.7)
Bomble bee Tinziza Bombus spp. 1 (0.5) 3 (1.7)
Ticks Meziger All tick spp. 1 (0.5) 1 (0.6)
Annelid Leeches Alekit All spp. 1 (0.5) 1 (0.6)

The traditional medicines were administrated via different modes. Eating, followed by drinking, tying, anointing, banding and massaging and, fumigation and heating were the major modes of application (Table 7). Solids and liquids were administered orally, whereas banding, heating, anointing, and massaging materials were applied to the skin. Medicinal fumes were allowed to enter the body via the nose, while some parts of animals like bones, skin, and teeth were believed to serve a healing purpose by tying them on the neck or other parts of the body. Most of the remedies did not involve the addition of substances like sugar, water, butter, honey, teff and millet flour, salt, spice, milk, egg, and coffee, but there were cases in which such additives were used.

Table 7.

Methods of preparation of traditional medicinal in the study area

No. Types of preparation No. of preparation Percentage (%)
1 Fresh 40 36.4
2 Cooking 26 23.6
3 Burning 15 13.6
4 Crushing/grinding 8 7.3
5 Wrapping 8 7.3
6 Powdering 7 6.4
7 Drying 6 5.4

Fidelity levels (FL) demonstrate the percentage of respondents claiming the use of a certain animal or its product for the same ailments. The honey of bee species (Apis mellifera) used to relieve wart, asthma, diarrhea, throat pain, stomachache, cough, and tuberculosis had the highest FL (n = 35, 97%) followed by meat of wild boar (Sus scrofa) to treat rheumatism, syphilis, stomachache, and malaria (n = 32, 89%), milk of goat (Capra aegagrus hircus) to treat eye disease, gastritis, headache, measles, tuberculosis, vomiting, and rheumatism (n = 27, 75%), teeth of the common warthog (Phacochoerus africanus) to treat toothache, wart, and rheumatism (n = 26, 72%), meat of the porcupine (Hystrix spp.) to treat swelling, tuberculosis, headache, AIDS, asthma, rheumatism, and gastritis (n = 24, 67%), and urine of Gazelle (Gazella spp.) to treat urination problems (n = 23, 64%). On the other hand, biles of common fox (Canis spp.) to cure eye problem and toothache (n = 2, 5.6%), the upper skin of the snake (Naja naja) to cure headache (n = 2, 5.6%), and the teeth of crocodile (Crocodylus spp.) to cure epilepsy (n = 2, 5.6%) have the lowest fidelity level value (Table 8).

Discussion

In Ethiopia, 70% of human and 90% of livestock population depend on traditional medicine [18]. In this study, 51 animal species and their products were collected and identified that were believed to be a cure/prevention of over 36 kinds of ailments. Other studies reported in Ethiopia showed that approximately 23 animals and/or their parts were identified to be used in traditional medicines in Degu tribes in Tigray region [22]. Sixteen species of medicinal animals were collected and identified for treating 18 different human ailments in the Kafta-Humera District, Northern Ethiopia [24]. The study conducted by Borah and Prasad recorded a total of 44 different species of animals which are used for the treatments of 40 different ailments [21]. In South Africa, Whiting et al. identified 147 medicinal vertebrate species representing 60 mammal species, 33 reptile species, 53 bird species and 1 amphibian species [12]. Oliveira et al. also described 23 animal species that used as traditional medicines [25]. Of a total 36 vertebrate species used in the treatment of ailments and disease, mammals comprised 50%; they were birds, fishes, reptile, and amphibians [26].

The inhabitants of the study area were found to use different parts/products of animals for the treatment of different kinds of ailments. Animals and the products derived from their body organs constitute part of the inventory of medicinal substances [10]. Meyer-Rochow also reported different organs of invertebrate animals used as traditional medicines [11].

In this study, parts/products of medicinal animals were grouped under meat/fat, blood, visceral organ, whole body, excreta, bone/teeth, and product categories and these categories were similar to ones reported by Haileselasie [22]. Other researches also stated that wild and domestic animals and their by-products such as hooves, skins, bones, feathers, and tusks are important ingredients in the preparation of curative, protective, and preventive medicine [79].

Preparations varied according to ailment and involved cooking, burning, crushing/grinding, wrapping, powdering, and drying [11]. In this study, egg is considered as one of the products of animals. The egg of ostrich (Struthio camelu) was mentioned as a traditional medicine in Table 8. It is used to treat muscle strain, broken bone, and paralysis. Gidey Yirga et al. showed medicinal animals have various methods of preparation for different types of ailments like crushing, powdering, squeezing, direct use, and cooking [27]. Haileselasie reported that animals are used as whole or body parts or by-products like milk, blood, organ, flesh, antler, and feathers for the treatments of different kinds of human ailments including cough, asthma, tuberculosis, paralysis, earache, herpes, weakness, and muscular pain [22].

This study showed that traditional medicines were administrated by drinking, eating, anointing, tying, branding, fumigation, and massaging. The study conducted by Gidey Yirga et al. showed most of traditional medicines were administrated orally and through dermal. Fumigating materials such as smokes were also entering into the body using nasal opening to treat different ailments. Some parts of animals such as bones, skin, and teeth were believed to be medicine by tying on the neck or other parts of the body [27].

The majority of the remedy preparations did not have additive substance while the remaining had different additive substances like sugar, water, butter, honey, teff and millet flour salt, spice, milk, egg, and coffee. The result of this study is similar to research conducted by Gidey Yirga et al. [27]. Haileselasie stated that many animals were used for the treatment of multiple ailments singly or in combinations with other animal products or/and plants like seeds, flowers, latex (resins in some cases), and roots [22].

The honey of bee species (Apis mellifera) is known to relieve wart, asthma, diarrhea, throat pain, stomachache, cough, and tuberculosis and achieves the highest fidelity level, whereas biles of common fox (Canis spp.) to cure eye problem and toothache, upper coats of snake (Naja naja) to cure headache, and teeth of crocodile (Crocodylus spp.) to cure epilepsy have the lowest fidelity level. On the other hand, Jaroli et al. stated that the uses of animals that are commonly known by the Garasiya informants have higher fidelity levels than less common known species [27]. He reported the cooked flesh of bat (Cynopterus sphinx) used to relieved cough and fever has the highest FL followed by blood of pigeon (Columba livia) to treat paralysis and urine of cow (Bos taurus) for wound healing, while the flesh of the pig (Sus scrofa) to relieve muscular pain and elephant (Elephas maximus) for pimples have the lowest fidelity level.

The finding of this study suggested that the traditional zootherapeutic remedial measures followed by the native people of Metema Woreda plays an important role in their primary healthcare. The documentation of this indigenous knowledge on animal-based medicines should be very helpful in the formulations of strategies for sustainable management and conservation of bio-resource as well as providing potential for novel drug discoveries [21].

Conclusions

The result shows that animals and their parts/products occupy key positions in the traditional medicine and medical practices to treat different ailments. Whole bodies or parts/products of traditional medicinal animals were used as a medicine. It was obvious that the members of the local communities studied possessed considerable knowledge related to preparation, administration, parts/products used, ingredients added, and other issues of traditional remedies. However, efforts to document, conserve, and manage the indigenous knowledge and skill were very scarce, and important indigenous knowledge is getting lost together with the elders and experts. Hence, it is important to document, conserve, and manage the indigenous knowledge, and further research should be done to test the products scientifically for product development.

Acknowledgements

We are very much grateful to all the respondents who shared their traditional zootherapeutic knowledge; without their contribution, this study would have been impossible. Furthermore, we would like to extend our gratitude to the College of Science, Bahir Dar University, which supplied laboratory room and required materials. We also thank Metema Woreda administrators and kebele leaders for their willingness to participate in the study. Finally, we would like to say thank you to both two reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions for the improvements of this manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The data used and analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request, without disclosure of the interviewees.

Declarations

We confirm that this work is original and has not been published elsewhere, nor is it currently under consideration for publication elsewhere.

Authors’ contributions

FA, SA, and MA proposed the research idea and collected the data from the respondents. FA organized the data in computer, did the analysis, interpretation, and identification, and wrote the manuscript. SA and MA revised the manuscript for scientific content and did the language check. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethics approval is not applicable. Written consent by the authors was obtained before the interviews. We explained the objectives of the research to each respondent, when we also had a chance to answer questions and clear doubts. We assured them that their information was anonymous and that it was only for research purposes.

Consent for publication

This manuscript does not contain any individual person’s data, and further consent for publication is not required.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Fasil Adugna Kendie, Email: fasiladugna@gmail.com.

Sileshi Andualem Mekuriaw, Email: s_andualem@yahoo.com.

Melkamu Andargie Dagnew, Email: melkamuandargie@gmail.com.

References

  • 1.Lohani U, Rajbhandari K, Shakuntala K. Need for systematic ethnozological studies in the conservations of ancient knowledge systems of Nepal. Indian J Tradi Knowl. 2008;7(4):634–637. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lev E. Traditional healing with animals (zootherapy); medieval to present-day Levantine practice. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003;86:107–118. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8741(02)00377-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Alves RRN, Souto WMS. Ethnozoology: a brief introduction. Ethnobiol Conserv. 2015;4:1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Costa-Neto EM. Animal-based medicines: biological prospection and the sustainable use of zootherapeutic resources. Ann Brazilian Acad Sci. 2005;77:33–43. doi: 10.1590/S0001-37652005000100004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Anageletti LR, Agrimi U, Curia C, French D, Mariani-Costantini R. Healing rituals and sacred serpents. Lancet. 1992;340:223–225. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)90480-Q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rosner F. Pigeons as a remedy (segulah) for jaundice. N Y State J Med. 1992;92:189–192. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Adeola MO. Importance of wild animals and their parts in the culture, religious festivals and traditional medicines of Nigeria. Environ Conserv. 1992;19:125–134. doi: 10.1017/S0376892900030605. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kang SP. Question of attitude: South Korea's traditional medicine practitioners and wildlife conservation. Hong Kong: TRAFFIC East Asia. 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Anyinam C. Ecology and ethnomedicine: exploring links between current environmental crisis and indigenous medical practices. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40:321–329. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)E0098-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Alves RRN, Rosa IL. Why study the use of animal products in traditional medicines? J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2005;10:1746–4269. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-1-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Meyer-Rochow VB. Therapeutic arthropods and other, largely terrestrial, folk-medicinally important invertebrates: a comparative survey and review. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2017;13:9. doi: 10.1186/s13002-017-0136-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Whiting MJ, Williams VL and Hibbitts TJ. Animals traded for traditional medicine at the Faraday market in South Africa: species diversity and conservation implications. J zool. 2010;284:84–96.
  • 13.CNCTHM (China National Corporation of Traditional and Herbal Medicine) In Materia medica commonly used in China. Beijing: Science Press; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Alves RR, Rosa IL. The use of animal-based remedies in urban areas of NE and N Brazil. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007;113:541–555. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2007.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Costa-Neto EM. Implications and applications of folk zootherapy in the state of Bahia, Northeastern Brazil. Sustain Dev. 2004;12(3):161–174. doi: 10.1002/sd.234. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Alves RR, Vieira WL, Santana GG. Reptiles used in traditional folk medicine: conservation implications. Biodivers Conserv. 2008;17(1):2037–2049. doi: 10.1007/s10531-007-9305-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Alves RRN. Faun used in popular medicine in Northeast Brazil. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2009;5:1–18. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-5-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Birhanu Z. Traditional use of medicinal plants by the ethnic groups of Gondar Zuria District, North-Western Ethiopia. J Nat Rem. 2013;13(1):2320–3358. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute) Initial draft report, Metema pilot learning site diagnosis and program design. 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.ARDO (Agricultural and Rural Development Office) The Woreda annual report: Shihedy. 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Borah MP, Brasad SB. Ethnozoological study of animals based medicines used by traditional healers and indigenous inhabitants in the anointing area Gibbon Wildlife Sanctuary, Assam, India. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2017;13:39. doi: 10.1186/s13002-017-0167-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Haileselasie T. Traditional zootherapeutic studies in Degu’a Tembien, Northern Ethiopia. Curr Res J Biol Sci. 2012;4(5):563–569. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Alexiades MN. Collecting ethnobotanical data. In: Alexiades MN, Sheldon JW, editors. Selected guideline for ethnobotanical research a field manual. New York: Bronex; 1996. pp. 40–102. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yirga G, Teferi M, Gebreslassea Y. Ethnozoological study of traditional medicinal animals used by the people of Kafta-Humera District, Northern Ethiopia. Int J Med Med Sci. 2011;3(10):316–320. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Oliveira ES, Torres DF, Brooks SE, Alves RRN. The medicinal animal markets in the metropolitan region of Natal City, Northeastern Brazil. J Ethnopharmacol. 2010;130:54–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2010.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chakravorty J, Meyer-Rochow VB, Ghosh S. Vertebrates used for medicinal purpose by members of Nyishi and Galo tribes in Arunachal Pradesh (North-East India) J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2011;7:13. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-7-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jaroli DP, Mahawar MM, Vyas N. An ethnozoological study in the adjoining areas of Mount Abu wildlife sanctuary, India. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2010;6:6. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-6-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data used and analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request, without disclosure of the interviewees.


Articles from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES