Abstract
Background
In view of the high mortality for cardiovascular diseases, it has become necessary to stratify the main risk factors and to choose the correct diagnostic modality. Studies have demonstrated that a zero calcium score (CS) is characteristic of a low risk for cardiovascular events. However, the prevalence of individuals with coronary atherosclerotic plaques and zero CS is conflicting in the specialized literature.
Objective
To evaluate the frequency of patients with coronary atherosclerotic plaques, their degree of obstruction and associated factors in patients with zero CS and indication for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).
Methods
This is a cross-sectional, prospective study with 367 volunteers with zero CS at CCTA in four diagnostic imaging centers in the period from 2011 to 2016. A significance level of 5% and 95% confidence interval were adopted.
Results
The frequency of atherosclerotic plaque in the coronary arteries in 367 patients with zero CS was 9.3% (34 individuals). In this subgroup, mean age was 52 ± 10 years, 18 (52.9%) were women and 16 (47%) had significant coronary obstructions (> 50%), with involvement of two or more segments in 4 (25%) patients. The frequency of non-obese individuals (90.6% vs 73.9%, p = 0.037) and alcohol drinkers (55.9% vs 34.8%, p = 0.015) was significantly higher in patients with atherosclerotic plaques, with an odds ratio of 3.4 for each of this variable.
Conclusions
The frequency of atherosclerotic plaque with zero CS was relatively high, indicating that the absence of calcification does not exclude the presence of plaques, many of which obstructive, especially in non-obese subjects and alcohol drinkers.
Keywords: Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis; Calcium Signaling; Coronary, Angiotomography; Risk Factors
Introduction
Coronary artery disease (CAD) are the leading cause of death in the world, including in Brazil. Many methods for CAD diagnosis, risk stratification of patients and indication of revascularization are currently available.1
One of the greatest challenges of routine cardiology practice is to determine the best method to detect subclinical CAD. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a predominantly anatomical test with excellent diagnostic accuracy in detecting obstructive and nonobstructive lesions as compared with coronary angiography, which is considered the gold standard method for this purpose. Also, CCTA may provide relevant information regarding atheroma composition according to radiological density.2,3
The role of coronary calcification, identified by calcium score (CS), used for classification of patients into a higher risk for cardiovascular events, is well known. Although individuals with a zero CS may also have atherosclerotic plaques,4,5 its presence has not been associated with increased risk for future cardiovascular events.4
Nevertheless, despite these results reported in international studies, we have not found Brazilian studies published on this specific subject. In fact, studies’ results may not be replicated in different sociodemographic or anthropometric contexts, or even in different healthcare conditions. Reproducibility of a study is a sine qua non for an extensive validation of its results.
Therefore, the main aim of this study is to evaluate the frequency of coronary atherosclerotic plaque, its degree of obstruction and associated factors in patients with zero CS and clinical indication for CCTA.
Methods
Subjects
This was a cross-sectional, analytical, prospective study carried out from April 2011 to November 2016. Subjects were consecutively and not randomly selected, and subjected to CCTA by referral from their assistant physicians in four diagnostic imaging centers, two public centers: Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia de São Paulo-SP e Hospital Universitário do Campus da Saúde Dr. João Cardoso Nascimento da Universidade Federal de Sergipe and two private centers: Hospital Primavera e Clínica de Medicina Nuclear e Diabetes-CLIMEDI.
Data on cardiovascular risk factors were collected from each participant. Chest pain was classified according to the Diamond and Forrester method, and most patients were classified as at intermediate risk for CAD.
Patients with no calcium in the coronary arteries (zero CS) were included. Patients who had undergone percutaneous or surgical myocardial revascularization, patients with history of acute coronary syndrome or cardiomyopathy of ischemic cause, and those who declined to participate were excluded.
The tests performed at private institutions were free of charge for both patients and investigators.
The study was approved by the research ethics committee (CAAE identification number 0289.0.107.000-11).
CS and CCTA of coronary arteries
CCTA of coronary arteries were performed using a 64-slice (or greater) scanner of the following models and manufacturers: Aquilion64™ - Toshiba™ Medical Systems Corporation, Otawara, Japan and Discovery STE VCT - General Electric Company, Connecticut, USA.
Non-contrast computed tomography for CS analysis was carried out using a longitudinal scan coverage from the level of the tracheal bifurcation to the superior border of cardiac silhouette, including the whole diaphragm for evaluation of the whole cardiac area. For CS examination, a field of view (FOV) of 200 mm was used, slice thickness 2.5-3 mm and interval 1.25-1.5 mm, 2 x 32 x 0,6 mm collimaton, rotation time 350 msec, tube current up to 600 mAs.
The study was conducted in two phases: in the first phase, CS was determined by the Agatston score;6 calcification was defined as the presence of a lesion with an area greater than 1 mm2, and peak intensity equal to or greater than 130 Hounsfield Units (HU), which was automatically identified and marked with color by the software. The presence of coronary plaques and extension of stenosis was evaluated in patients with zero CS.
In the second phase, CCTA was performed using the CS parameters for FOV construction, voltage 120 kv, and 400 miliamperes. Up to 1.5mL/kg iopamidol was administered intravenously to patients still positioned on the table. Iopamidol is a nonionic, iodinated contrast, administered at concentrations of 350-370 mg/mL and rate of 4.5-5.5 mL/s (Ultravist® 370, Bayer HealthCare and Pharmaceuticals, Berlin, Germany; HenetiX® 350, Guerbet, Paris, France).
An oral betablocker was administered within 24 hours before the test, or intravenously on the day of the test in patients with sinus rhythm and heart rate (HR) > 70 bpm. The system uses HR values monitored during the exam to establish the parameters for imaging acquisition, such as the helical pitch (relationship between table distance traveled in one 360º X-ray tube rotation, slice thickness and the number of detector rows), speed of gantry rotation, and exposure time, to achieve the best possible temporal resolution.
Images were sent to the workstation for analysis of coronary arteries by three experienced observers. The presence of atherosclerotic plaque was examined in vessels with a luminal diameter larger than 2 mm, divided into 15 segments.7 Extension of stenosis was estimated by calculating the area of the narrowest part of the lumen in relation to the area of the lumen immediately distal to the same segment. Plaques detected by the CCTA were classified into nonobstructive and obstructive lesions, with a reduction ≥ 50% of the lumen in the latter.
Data analysis
Quantitative variables were described as mean and standard deviation. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to test normality of the sample. The Student’s t-test was used for independent groups, according to data normality. Absolute and relative frequencies were used for categorical variables. For between-group comparisons of these variables, the chi-square test of the Fisher’s exact test was used as appropriate.
Differences were considered statistically significant when probabilities were lower than 5% (p ≤ 0.05) and power of 0.80.
For analysis of independent predictors for the presence of plaque, a manual backwards selection (Backward:Wald method) for logistic regression was used. A p ≤ 0.25 was considered for an initial selection and the variable was maintained in the model when p < 0.05. The outcome variable presence of plaque was adjusted for age, sex, smoking, diabetes mellitus, systemic arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, family history, obesity and alcohol consumption.
Statistical analyses of results were performed using the SPSS software for Windows version 20.0 (IBM® Corporation, Somers, USA).
Results
Clinical characteristics of the sample
In the study period, 1,639 patients were subjected to CCTA at the four participating centers; 619 of them had zero CS. However, 252 were excluded due to lack of clinical data or refusal to participate in the study. Patients were referred to CCTA for atypical chest pain (40.4%), typical chest pain (24.9%), risk factors for CAD, family history of early CAD (51.4%) and positive or inconclusive tests for ischemia (44.4%).
Of 367 patients, 211 (57.7%) patients were hypertensive, 180 (49.3%) dyslipidemic and 55 (15.0%) diabetic. Mean age was 53.7 (±10.5) years and 63.5% were women. Clinical data of patients with zero CS according to the presence or absence of atherosclerotic plaque at CCTA are described in Table 1.
Table 1.
Variable | n† | % |
---|---|---|
Mean age (years) * | 367 | 53.7 ± 10.5 |
Female sex | 233/367 | 63.5 |
Systemic arterial hypertension | 211/367 | 57.5 |
Dyslipidemia | 180/367 | 49.3 |
Diabetes mellitus | 55/367 | 15.0 |
Body mass index (kg/m2) | 316 | 27.3 ± 4.4 |
Obesity | 77/316 | 24.4 |
Family history of CAD | 187/364 | 51.4 |
Alcohol consumption | 135/367 | 36.8 |
Smoking | 51/366 | 13.9 |
Atypical chest pain † | 138/342 | 40.4 |
Typical chest pain † | 85/341 | 24.9 |
CAD: coronary artery disease;
Values in mean ± standard deviation; other values expressed as simple frequency (%);
"n" different from total population due to missing data in the records
Frequency of atherosclerotic plaque in coronary arteries was 9.3% (34/367); 95%CI 6.3 - 12.3. In this group, mean age was 52 ± 10 years and 18 (52.9%) were women (Table 2). A detailed analysis revealed the presence of obstructive lesions (larger than 50% of vessel lumen) in 47% (16/34) of cases, distributed as follows: a) in one segment - 12 patients; b) in two segments - 3 patients; and c) in more than two segments - 1 patient (Figure 1). In the subgroup of patients with nonobstructive lesions (18/34), 15 and 3 patients, respectively, had one and three coronary segments affected (Table 3).
Table 2.
Variable | n† | With plaque n = 34 | Without plaque n = 333 | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age* (years) | 367 | 52 ± 10.7 | 53.9 ± 10.5 | 0.31 |
Weight (Kg) | 367 | 71.6 ± 12.9 | 73.7 ± 15.2 | 0.42 |
Body mass index (Kg/m2) | 316 | 25.9 ± 3.3 | 27.5 ± 4.4 | 0.046 |
Female | 233/367 | 18 (52.9) | 215 (64.6) | 0.180 |
Smoking | 51/366 | 8 (24.2) | 43 (12.9) | 0.073 |
Non-obese | 55/316 | 29 (90.6) | 210 (73.9) | 0.037 |
Diabetes mellitus | 55/367 | 6 (17.6) | 49 (14.7) | 0.648 |
Dyslipidemia | 180/365 | 16 (47.1) | 164 (49.5) | 0.782 |
Systemic arterial hypertension | 211/367 | 20 (58.8) | 191 (57.4) | 0.712 |
Alcohol consumption | 135/367 | 19 (55.9) | 116 (34.8) | 0.015 |
Family history | 187/364 | 18 (52.9) | 169 (51.2) | 0.848 |
Values as mean ± standard deviation; other values expressed as simple frequency (%); p-value obtained by the chi-square test for associations;
"n" different from total population due to missing data in the records.
Table 3.
Variable | One vessel affected | Two vessels affected | Two or more vessels affected | Total n = 34 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Obstructive lesion > 50% | 12 (75%) | 3 (18.7%) | 1 (6.3%) | 16 (47.0%) |
Nonobstructive lesion | 15 (83.3%) | 3 (16.6%) | 0 | 18 (53%) |
The most affected artery was the anterior descending, 16 (35.56%) in its proximal segment, 10 (22.22%) in the middle segment, and 2 (4.44%) in the distal one.
It is worth mentioning that analysis of atheroma in the CCTA with contrast phase revealed that 3/34 (8.8%) patients had plaques with some degree of calcification that were not detected by the CS (Figure 2).
Clinical features of patients with zero CS, classified by the presence or absence of atherosclerotic plaques in coronary arteries
In patients with coronary artery plaque, most patients were obese (90.6% vs. 73.9%; BMI: 25.9 ± 3.3 k/m2vs. 27.5 ± 4.4 k/m2; p = 0.046) and alcohol drinkers (55.9% vs. 34.8%) (Table 2). The other variables were not different between the groups.
Non-adjusted odds ratio of the factors associated with the presence of atherosclerotic plaque in patients with zero CS were 2.3 (95%CI = 1.1 - 4.8; p = 0.018) for alcohol consumption and 3.4 (95%CI = 1.0 - 11.5; p = 0.049) for absence of obesity (Table 4). Finally, analysis of contingency table for adjusted odds ratio confirmed higher OR values for alcohol drinkers (OR = 3.4; 95%CI = 1.1 - 5.19; p = 0.018) and non-obese patients (OR = 3.4; 95%CI = 1.0 - 11.7; p = 0.047) (Table 5).
Table 4.
Variable | Non-adjusted odds ratio | 95%CI | p |
---|---|---|---|
Age | 0.976 | 0.940 - 1.01 | 0.216 |
Sex | |||
Male | 1.62 | 0.796- 3.29 | 0.183 |
Smoking | |||
Yes | 2.15 | 0.919 - 5.09 | 0.079 |
Obesity | |||
No* | 3.40 | 1.01 - 11.51 | 0.049 |
Diabetes mellitus | |||
Yes | 1.24 | 0.489 - 3.15 | 0.649 |
Dyslipidemia | |||
Yes | 1.10 | 0.545 - 2.24 | 0.782 |
Systemic arterial hypertension | |||
Yes | 1.06 | 0.519 - 2.17 | 0.869 |
Alcohol consumption | |||
Yes | 2.37 | 1.16 - 4.83 | 0.018 |
Family history | |||
Yes | 1.07 | 0.528 -2.17 | 0.366 |
Outcome variable: presence of plaque; other variables described in the table are associated factors;
presence of obesity was used as reference for the variable obesity, CI: confidence interval;
adjusted for age, sex, smoking, diabetes mellitus, systemic arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, family history, obesity and alcohol consumption.
Table 5.
Variable | Adjusted odds ratio | 95%CI | p |
---|---|---|---|
Alcohol consumption | 3.46 | 1.16 - 5.19 | 0.018 |
Non-obese* | 3.45 | 1.01 - 11.7 | 0.047 |
Outcome variable: presence of plaque; other variables described in the table are associated factors;
presence of obesity was used as reference for the variable non-obese, CI: confidence interval
adjusted for age, sex, smoking, diabetes mellitus, systemic arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, family history, obesity and alcohol consumption.
Discussion
The main finding of the present study was the considerable presence (9.3%) of obstructive (≥ 50%) coronary atherosclerotic plaques in patients with zero CS.
Clinical features found to be associated with the presence of plaques were alcohol consumption and absence of obesity, in contrast to other risk factors usually associated with CAD, such as: diabetes mellitus, systemic arterial hypertension and dyslipidemia.8
Data on the literature have shown variable prevalence of atherosclerotic plaque in individuals with zero CS. In a study conducted in Isfahan (Iran), 385 patients with zero CS were studied, and 16 of them (4.1%) had atherosclerotic plaque at CCTA.5 In another study involving symptomatic and asymptomatic patients showed that only symptomatic subjects with zero CS had atherosclerotic plaque (8.4%).9 According to the CONFIRM study, in patients with zero CS, 13% had nonobstructive atherosclerotic lesions, and 3.5% had obstructive lesion greater than 50%.4 A multicentric cohort study in which Brazil participates (a CORE64 sub-study) confirmed that a zero CS does not exclude the need for revascularization. With a sample of 291 patients (72 with zero CS), 19% had stenosis ≥50%, and 13% of them required revascularization.10
Also, studies involving patients with chest pain in the emergency department have shown frequencies of atherosclerotic plaques with zero CE of up to 39%,11-13 although this is a different population from those attending outpatient services. It is of note, however, that our sample population was composed of patients referred to CCTA from their assistant physicians. As reported in international studies, we also found that the presence of atherosclerotic plaque cannot be ruled out in patients with zero CS.
In our study, only the variables alcohol consumption and absence of obesity were associated with higher risk of atherosclerotic plaque, in contrast to classical risk factors for CAD (diabetes mellitus, systemic arterial hypertension and dyslipidemia). Interestingly, higher BMI was associated with absence of atherosclerotic lesion. Previous studies have suggested obesity as a protective factor for CAD, the so-called obesity paradox.14 Nevertheless, such paradox is not concerned to abdominal obesity, which has been associated with CAD and considered more pathological than subcutaneous fat accumulation.14-16 In our study, we did not measure abdominal circumference, which may have influenced the consistency of results. Besides, obese patients included in many studies that indicated obesity as a protective factor were younger, which may be a source of bias.17
Alcohol consumption has also yielded diverging results. While some studies have indicated alcohol consumption as a risk factor for CAD, others have pointed out its beneficial effects, such as studies performed with wine and its component resveratrol.18-20 Resveratrol is known for its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, in addition to promote the synthesis of HDL in the liver and inhibit LDL production, thereby preventing LDL oxidation and reducing the risk of cardiovascular diseases.21 In this regard, further studies that specify the type of beverage consumed and not only whether the subjects consumed or not alcohol are needed.
Limitations
Some inherent limitations deserve to be mentioned - first, as previously described, patients were referred to CCTA with CS from their assistant physicians, and the possibility of a selection bias cannot be excluded; second, coronary risk stratification of patients was not performed before their inclusion and data on risk factors were obtained by questionnaires; third, sample was collected in four different centers and, although the tests were performed following similar protocols, some characteristics are particular of each service which may have cause a bias in the analysis; fourth, since we studied patients with clinical indication for CCTA, our sample differed from asymptomatic patients without positive ischemic test, who would be referred to CS alone, and in whom coronary calcification would predict cardiovascular events.
Conclusions
The frequency of atherosclerotic plaque in patients with zero CS was relatively high, indicating that in patients with clinical indication for CCTA, the absence of coronary calcification does not exclude atherosclerotic plaque or obstructive lesion, especially in obese and alcohol drinkers.
Footnotes
Sources of Funding
There were no external funding sources for this study.
Study Association
This article is part of the thesis of master submitted by Fabíola Santos Gabriel o, from Universidade Federal de Sergipe.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universidade Federal de Sergipe under the protocol number CAAE 0289.0.107.000-11. All the procedures in this study were in accordance with the 1975 Helsinki Declaration, updated in 2013. Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.
Author contributions
Conception and design of the research: Gabriel FS, Gonçalves LFG, Pinto IMF, Oliveira JLM; Acquisition of data: Gabriel FS, Gonçalves LFG, Santana SMM, Matos CJO, Conceição FMS, Souto MJS; Analysis and interpretation of the data: Gabriel FS, Gonçalves LFG, Melo EV, Sousa ACS, Oliveira JLM; Statistical analysis: Gabriel FS, Melo EV; Writing of the manuscript: Gabriel FS, Gonçalves LFG, Sousa ACS, Pinto IMF, Oliveira JLM; Critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content: Gabriel FS, Gonçalves LFG, Melo EV, Sousa ACS, Pinto IMF, Santana SMM, Matos CJO, Conceição FMS, Oliveira JLM, Souto MJS.
Potential Conflict of Interest
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
References
- 1.Cesar LA, Ferreira JF, Armaganijan D, Gowdak LH, Mansur AP, Bodanese LC, et al. Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia Guideline for stable coronary artery disease. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014;103(2) Suppl 2:1–56. doi: 10.5935/abc.2014s004. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.2014S004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Abdulla J, Abildstrom SZ, Gotzsche O, Christensen E, Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C. 64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(24):3042–3050. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm466.. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schroeder S, Kuettner A, Wojak T, Janzen J, Heuschmid M, Athanasiou T, et al. Non-invasive evaluation of atherosclerosis with contrast enhanced 16 slice spiral computed tomography: results of ex vivo investigations. Heart. 2004;90(12):1471–1475. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.037861.. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Villines TC, Hulten EA, Shaw LJ, Goyal M, Dunning A, Achenbach S, et al. CONFIRM Registry Investigators Prevalence and severity of coronary artery disease and adverse events among symptomatic patients with coronary artery calcification scores of zero undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(24):2533–2540. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.851.. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Moradi M, Varasteh E. Coronary atherosclerosis evaluation among Iranian patients with zero coronary calcium score in computed tomography coronary angiography. Adv Biomed Res. 2016 Feb 08;5:24. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.175920.. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte Jr M, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15(4):827–832. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-t. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sousa AG. [Percutaneous cardiovascular intervention procedures in Brazil (1992-1993). Report of the National Registry-National Center for Cardiovascular Interventions] Arq Bras Cardiol. 1994;62(4):217–223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Oliveira JL, Hirata MH, Sousa AG, Gabriel FS, Hirata TD, Tavares IS, et al. Male gender and arterial hypertension are plaque predictors at coronary computed tomography angiography. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2015;104(5):409–416. doi: 10.5935/abc.20150028. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20150028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Akram K, O’Donnell RE, King S, Superko HR, Agatston A, Voros S. Influence of symptomatic status on the prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with zero calcium score. Atherosclerosis. 2009;203(2):533–537. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.07.008.. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gottlieb I, Miller JM, Arbab-Zadeh A, Dewey M, Clouse ME, Sara L, et al. The absence of coronary calcification does not exclude obstructive coronary artery disease or the need for revascularization in patients referred for conventional coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(7):627–634. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.072.. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Henneman M, Schuijf JD, Pundziute G, Werkhoven JM van, Wall EE van der, Jukema JW, et al. Noninvasive evaluation with multislice computed tomography in suspected acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;52(3):216–222. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.04.012.. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pursnani A, Chou ET, Zakroysky P, Deaño RC, Mamuya WS, Woodard PK, et al. Use of coronary artery calcium scanning beyond coronary computed tomographic angiography in the emergency department evaluation for acute chest pain. The ROMICAT II trial. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(3):e002225. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002225.. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rubinshtein R, Gaspar T, Halon DA, Goldstein J, Peled N, Lewis BS. Prevalence and extent of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with zero or low calcium score undergoing 64-slice cardiac multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of a chest pain syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2007;(99):472–475. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.08.060.. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Parsa AF, Jahanshahi B. I Is the relationship of body mass index to severity of coronary artery disease different from that of waist to-hip ratio and severity of coronary artery disease? Paradoxical findings. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2015;26(1):13–16. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2014-054.. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Morricone L, Ferrari M, Enrini R, Inglese L, Giardini D, Garancini P, et al. The role of central fat distribution in coronary artery disease in obesity: comparison of nondiabetic obese, diabetic obese, and normal weight subjects. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999;23(11):1129–1135. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801042. Erratum in: Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24(4):525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Empana JP, Ducimetiere P, Charles MA, Jouven X. Sagittal abdominal diameter an risk of sudden death in asymptomatic middle-aged men in Paris Prospective Study I. Circulation. 2004;110(18):2781–2785. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000146395.64065.BA.. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rubinshtein R, Halon DA, Jaffe R, Shahla J, Lewis BS. Relation between obesity and severity of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97(9):1277–1280. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.11.061.. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Renaud S, Lorgeril M. Wine, alcohol, platelets, and the French paradox for coronary heart disease. Lancet. 1992;339(8808):1523–1526. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91277-f. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(92)91277-F [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Maisch B. Alcoholic cardiomyopathy: the result of dosage and individual predisposition. Herz. 2016;41(6):484–493. doi: 10.1007/s00059-016-4469-6.. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gaziano JM, Buring JE, Breslow JL, Goldhaber SZ, Rosner B, VanDenburgh M, et al. Moderate alcohol intake, increased levels of highdensity lipoprotein and its subfractions, and decreased risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(25):1829–1834. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199312163292501.. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sautter CK, Denardin S, Alves AO, Mallmann CA, Penna NG, Hecktheuer LH. Determinação de resveratrol em sucos de uva no Brasil. Ciênc Tecnol Aliment. 2005;25(3):437–442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612005000300008 [Google Scholar]