Table 8.
Stage 1: Changes in the MCDA results in respect to weight penalty on Expert 3. Bold formatting indicates the methodology and respective results chosen for the second part of the analysis in Section 4.2.
| 2-tuple WSM x WSM (Herrera et al., 2005) |
TOPSIS x TOPSIS (Krohling and Campanharo, 2011) |
WSM x TOPSIS (Chen, 2000) |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without penalty |
With Penalty |
Without penalty |
With Penalty |
Without penalty |
With Penalty |
||||||
| Ranking | Score | Ranking | Score | Ranking | Score | Ranking | Score | Ranking | Score | Ranking | Score |
| R1 | 3.2962 | R1 | 3.2789 | R1 | 0.0487 | R1 | 0.0466 | R1 | 0.0822 | R1 | 0.0822 |
| R6 | 3.2045 | R6 | 3.2171 | R6 | 0.0183 | R6 | 0.0210 | R6 | 0.0349 | R6 | 0.0349 |
| R9 | 3.1394 | R9 | 3.1593 | R9 | 0.0159 | R9 | 0.0186 | R9 | 0.0324 | R9 | 0.0324 |
| R5 | 2.9614 | R5 | 2.9341 | R5 | 0.0096 | R5 | 0.0059 | R5 | 0.0257 | R5 | 0.0257 |
| R2 | 2.7894 | R2 | 2.7740 | R4 | −0.0063 | R10 | −0.0079 | R10 | 0.0034 | R10 | 0.0034 |
| R4 | 2.7568 | R10 | 2.7228 | R10 | −0.0064 | R4 | −0.0128 | R4 | −0.0038 | R3 | −0.0038 |
| R10 | 2.7326 | R4 | 2.7073 | R2 | −0.0169 | R3 | −0.0180 | R3 | −0.0075 | R4 | −0.0075 |
| R3 | 2.5712 | R3 | 2.5715 | R3 | −0.0185 | R2 | −0.0193 | R2 | −0.0194 | R2 | −0.0194 |
| R7 | 2.4894 | R7 | 2.5130 | R7 | −0.0337 | R7 | −0.0299 | R7 | −0.0259 | R7 | −0.0259 |
| R8 | 2.2939 | R8 | 2.3106 | R8 | −0.0357 | R8 | −0.0322 | R8 | −0.0299 | R8 | −0.0299 |