Table 9.

Stage 2: Policy instruments (alternatives), implementation risks (criteria) and weights.

Alternatives (Policy instruments)	Evaluation Criteria (Risks)	Weights (%)
P1. "Saving at Home" Programmes	R1. Political inertia	19.80%
P2. "Saving at Local Authority I and II″ Programmes	R2. Political instability	6.90%
P3. "Energy upgrade of residential buildings" Programme	R3. Lack of institutional capacity	7.00%
P4. "Energy upgrade of public buildings" Programme	R4. Lack of financial capacity	8.50%
P5. "Energy upgrade of commercial buildings" Programme	R5. Bureaucracy	12.00%
P6. Training actions for service sector personnel	R6. Lack of trust	14.30%
P7. Diffusion of smart metering systems	R7. Lack of societal acceptance	4.70%
P8. Energy managers in public buildings	R8. Insufficient technical skills	3.90%
P9. Replacement of old public and private light-duty trucks	R9. Market instability	13.80%
P10. Replacement of old private vehicles	R10. Inadequate infrastructure	9.00%
P11. Development of the Metro transport network in Thessaloniki
P12. Extension of the Metro transport network in Athens