Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 13;64(3):212–221. doi: 10.1159/000485135

Table 3.

Predictors in final multivariable models for trajectories of functional decline in young older males and females

Variable Males (n = 312)
Females (n = 360)
intermediate vs. no/little decline
severe vs. no/little decline
p value LRT intermediate vs. no/little decline
severe vs. no/little decline
p value LRT
beta1 OR (95% CI) beta1 OR (95% CI) beta1 OR (95% CI)1 beta OR (95% CI)
intercept
 inCHIANTI −1.20 −2.14 −8.13 −34.47
 LASA −0.56 −1.09 −9.04 −34.00
Age (years) - - 0.11 1.17 (1.03 – 1.32) 0.43 1.83 (1.22 – 2.75) 0.001
Living alone - - 0.28 1.48 (0.80 – 2.72) −1.11 0.21 (0.05 – 0.97) 0.015

Economic satisfaction
 Good - - 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.008
 Sufficient - - 0.05 1.07 (0.62 – 1.87) 1.47 7.78 (1.56 – 38.87)
 Bad - - 0.68 2.59 (0.93 – 7.18) 2.01 16.65 (2.50– 110.92)
Unable to perform tandem stand for 10 s - - 0.61 2.34 (1.20 – 4.58) 0.68 2.58 (0.66 – 10.13) 0.037
Gait speed2 (m/s) −0.21 0.74 (0.57 – 0.97) −0.63 0.42 (0.26 – 0.66) 0.000 −0.48 0.51 (0.38 – 0.68) −1.24 0.18 (0.07 – 0.44) 0.000
Fear of falling 0.36 1.65 (0.69 – 3.94) 1.24 5.67 (1.94 – 16.57) 0.008 - -

Physical activity
 High level - - 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.023
 Moderate level - - 0.06 1.09 (0.61 – 1.94) −0.29 0.67 (0.11 – 4.17)
 Low level - - 0.14 1.23 (0.56 – 2.70) 1.45 7.60 (1.77 – 32.52)
≥1 glasses alcohol/week 0.26 1.43 (0.66 – 3.08) −0.77 0.34 (0.13 – 0.90) 0.029 - -

BMI
 <25 - - 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.005
 25 – 29.99 - - 0.45 1.88 (1.02 – 3.48) 0.31 1.54 (0.21 – 11.18)
 ≥30 - - 0.72 2.74 (1.38 – 5.43) 1.49 7.99 (1.40 – 45.62)
Cardiovascular disease - - 0.21 1.35 (0.63 – 2.90) 1.42 7.27 (1.75 – 30.21) 0.023

CI, confidence interval; LRT, likelihood ratio test; OR, odds ratio. The OR in multinomial regression analysis indicates the risk of the trajectory compared to the reference group (i.e., no/little decline trajectory). For example, females with sufficient economic satisfaction had a 7% higher risk (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.62 – 1.87) of being in the intermediate trajectory than females with good economic satisfaction, but they had a 8 times higher risk of being in the severe trajectory (OR 7.78, 95% CI 1.56 – 38.87) than females with good economic satisfaction.

1

Shrunken, shrinkage factor 0.711 for males, 0.716 for females.

2

OR for gait speed refer to standardized Z scores since different tests were applied in the two cohorts to assess gait speed. Z scores were calculated per cohort: Zmales inCHIANTI = (m/s − 1.570)/0.256; Zmales lasa = (m/s − 0.959)/0.257. Zfemales Inschianti = (m/s − 1.271)/0.249; Zfemales lasa = (m/s − 0.876)/0.242.