Skip to main content
Journal of Neurological Surgery Reports logoLink to Journal of Neurological Surgery Reports
. 2018 May 25;79(2):e41–e54. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1645885

Giant Cell Tumor of the Lateral Skull Base: Diagnostic and Management Options

Nicholas T Gamboa 1, Brenden Ronna 1, Christina T Gamboa 2, Cheryl A Palmer 3, Min S Park 1, Richard K Gurgel 4, William T Couldwell 1, M Yashar S Kalani 1,
PMCID: PMC5969995  PMID: 29845001

Abstract

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a rare, benign, osteolytic neoplasm that most commonly occurs in early adulthood and often involves the long bones of the body. Although GCTB largely affects the epiphyses of long bones, several reports of GCTB involvement of the cranial and facial bones exist in the literature. In addition to reviewing other reported cases of GCTBs of the lateral skull base in the literature, the authors report here on the clinical presentation, radiographic findings, and neurosurgical management of a patient found to have a GCTB of the middle and infratemporal fossae, which was treated by aggressive en bloc resection of the lateral skull base.

Keywords: giant cell tumor of bone, lateral skull base tumor, neurosurgery, osteoclastoma, radiotherapy

Introduction

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB; or osteoclastoma) is an uncommon, benign, osteolytic neoplasm. GCTB comprises 3 to 5% of all primary bone tumors and occurs predominantly in early adulthood (peak incidence ages, 20–40 years) with a slight female predominance (3:2). 1 2 3 These tumors are thought to originate from neoplastic nonosteogenic stromal cells of the bone marrow and are characterized histologically by numerous multinucleated osteoclastic giant cells diffusely distributed among a background of mononuclear stromal and macrophage lineage cells. 1 4 5 6 GCTB most commonly affects the epiphyses of long bones, particularly of the distal femur and proximal tibia. 6 Patients classically present with a combination of pain, swelling, or pathologic fracture at the tumor origin. 7 Although regarded as benign, GCTB can recur locally following en bloc surgical resection. 8 9 In 2 to 3% of cases, GCTBs can hematogenously metastasize to the lungs, resulting in benign pulmonary implants with rare malignant transformation. 9 10 Despite an improved understanding of the molecular and cellular biology underlying the GCTB pathogenesis, the behavior of this tumor is often heterogeneous and can be difficult to predict on the basis of clinical, radiographic, or histologic features.

Although involvement of the appendicular skeleton is more typical for GCTB, axial skeleton involvement, especially of the cranial and facial bones, has also been reported and is becoming increasingly appreciated in the literature. Approximately 2% of GCTBs involve the head and neck. 11 12 13 Involvement of the axial skeleton is often associated with increased morbidity because of local infiltration of critical structures and the associated difficulty of complete tumor resection, particularly compared with resection of GCTBs of the appendicular skeleton. 8 14 GCTB of the skull has also been reported to behave in a locally aggressive fashion. 15 Nevertheless, surgery remains the treatment of choice for GCTBs, including those in the skull, with en bloc or wide local excision portending the lowest risk of recurrence and best clinical outcomes in patients. 4 16 Although much research has focused on GCTBs involving the long bones, numerous studies have also reported on GCTBs involving the lateral skull base. Here, we review other reported cases of GCTBs involving the lateral skull base and report on the clinical presentation, radiographic findings, neurosurgical management, and outcome of a patient with a GCTB of the middle and infratemporal fossae.

Methods

A literature search was performed using the PubMed/Medline database for cases of GCTB of the lateral skull base. The literature search spanned articles published between 1970 and June 2017. The keywords utilized in the search included: “giant cell tumor of bone,” “GCTB,” “GCT,” “osteoclastoma,” “lateral skull base,” and “skull base tumor.” The list of publications was reviewed for articles with relevance to our study (i.e., reports of GCTB of the lateral skull base). Full-text articles in the English language were reviewed and chosen based on whether they included a reported case of a patient with a GCTB involving the lateral skull base.

Case Report

History and Examination

A 22-year-old man presented to the neurosurgical service after sustaining a traumatic brain injury when he was hit by a vehicle while riding his bike without a helmet. The patient experienced a brief loss of consciousness at the scene and reported a nonfluctuating headache. He was taken to an outside hospital, where a noncontrast head computed tomography (CT) scan demonstrated a left temporal intraparenchymal hemorrhage, left temporal bone fractures, multiple facial bone fractures, and an incidental lytic bone mass of the left lateral skull base ( Fig. 1 ). The patient was transferred to our institution for further evaluation.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Preoperative head computed tomography (CT) showing giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) arising from the left lateral skull base. (A) Coronal head CT without contrast demonstrating a lytic mass of the left squamous part of the temporal bone with extension into the left sphenoid bone, mastoid air cells, and middle ear cavity. Imaging demonstrates destruction of the left lateral wall of the middle cranial fossa with bony fragment displacement laterally, medially, and inferiorly. The mass is also associated with intracranial hemorrhage and air within the hematoma that extends into the left temporal lobe. Moderate mass effect is present with left-to-right shift. (B) Axial head CT without contrast showing a lytic mass originating from the squamous part of the temporal bone. Imaging also reveals comminuted left orbital fractures, left maxillary sinus fractures, and a left zygomatic arch fracture.

Upon additional history gathering, the patient reported decreased hearing in the left ear over several months, as well as a recent slight bulging of his left face. On examination, the patient was awake, alert, and oriented to person and place. Cranial nerves were grossly intact, except for diminished sensorineural hearing in his left ear. Motor and sensory examinations were grossly intact throughout. He underwent diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which revealed a large tumor extending from the middle cranial fossa into the infratemporal fossa, with an associated intraparenchymal hemorrhage involving the left temporal lobe ( Fig. 2 ). Given this finding, the patient was taken to the operative theater for tumor resection.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) arising from the left lateral skull base. (A) Axial T2-weighted MRI demonstrating destructive heterogeneous, hypointense, peripherally enhancing lesion centered in the left squamous part of the temporal bone that measures 4.5 × 4.0 × 4.9 cm. (B) Axial T2-weighted MRI demonstrating hypointense mass with extension anteriorly into the left sphenoid bone. Imaging is notable for intracranial extension, mass effect on the left temporal lobe, and surrounding vasogenic edema. Midline shift of ∼5 mm is present with early left uncal herniation, effacement of the left ambient cistern, and compression of the midbrain. (C) Coronal T1-weighted MRI demonstrating a mass arising from the squamous part of the temporal bone and extending into the left temporal lobe. (D) Sagittal T1-weighted MRI demonstrating anteroposterior and craniocaudal extension of the tumor.

Operative and Postoperative Course

The patient was positioned supine and secured in a Mayfield frame for microsurgical resection of the lesion. Given the infratemporal extension of the tumor, a Fisch-type approach was utilized, with a preauricular incision providing access to the infratemporal and intracranial components of this neoplasm. After elevation of the temporalis muscle, the tumor was found to be intimately involved with the bony structures. Frozen and eventual final pathology samples were consistent with a giant cell tumor without malignant features ( Fig. 3 ). Accordingly, a gross total resection of the tumor with negative margins was performed.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Photomicrograph of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained histopathologic specimens from a patient with giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) of the infratemporal fossa. (A) H&E stained specimen (100 × ) demonstrating numerous multinucleated osteoclastic giant cells distributed diffusely among a background of neoplastic mononuclear stromal cells and mononuclear macrophage lineage cells. (B) H&E stained specimen (100 × ) demonstrating tumor necrosis with nearby multinucleated osteoclastic giant cells and mononuclear stroma cells.

The temporal bone was drilled thoroughly with sacrifice of the left vestibulocochlear nerve to attain adequate margins. The left facial nerve was identified and skeletonized to protect and preserve function. Tumor-infiltrated temporal, frontal, and zygomatic bones were removed. Tumor feeding vessels arising from the superficial and deep temporal arteries were coagulated to devascularize the tumor. Normal bony margins were obtained. With respect to the intracranial compartment, tumor involving the dura was resected. In addition, upon reflection of the dura, the tumor was found to involve the left lateral temporal lobe, causing hemorrhage and mass effect. The left temporal lobe involved by the tumor was surgically resected.

At the completion of the procedure, the facial nerve was stimulated to ensure its integrity, and meticulous hemostasis was obtained. To repair the skull base defect, mesh cranioplasty with polymethyl methacrylate was fashioned to a normal cranial contour. A small amount of superficial fat was placed into the site of the defect. MRI demonstrated complete removal of the tumor in this patient ( Fig. 4 ). Postoperatively, the patient had nonserviceable hearing in the left ear, but was otherwise neurologically intact, including preservation of the facial nerve function, and was discharged home on postoperative day 5. No adjuvant radiation was planned. At the 3-month follow-up, the patient was neurologically intact but did require cerebrospinal fluid diversion for a hygroma.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Postoperative computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrating gross total resection of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) of the left lateral skull base with mesh cranioplasty. (A) Axial head CT without contrast demonstrating postsurgical changes. Comminuted left orbital and maxillary sinus fractures are present. (B) Axial T2-weighted MRI demonstrating postsurgical changes from left temporal bone craniectomy, tumor resection, and mesh cranioplasty. Imaging shows no signs of residual disease. Complete surgical resection with resultant decompression and normalization of midline shift is apparent on postoperative imaging.

Results

Table 1 summarizes the cases of tumors involving the lateral skull base identified in our review of the English language literature. Including our case, a total of 94 patients with GCTBs of the lateral skull base were identified through our review. As an aggregate, 56% of patients were male (53/94), while 44% were female (41/94). The mean age at presentation was 36.8 years (range: 0.17–79 years). Clinical presentations were variable and included headache (33%, 29/88), hearing loss (31%, 27/88), facial/preauricular swelling (22%, 19/88), facial/preauricular pain (17%, 15/88), tinnitus (15%, 13/88), aural fullness (10%, 9/88), diplopia (10%, 9/88), vision loss (10%, 9/88), ear pain (8%, 7/88), facial nerve palsy (8%, 7/88), proptosis (5%, 4/88), and dizziness (5%, 4/88). GCTB origin, in order of frequency, was temporal bones (62%, 58/94), sphenoid bones (32%, 30/94), occipital bones (5%, 5/94), and frontal bones (1%, 1/94).

Table 1. Review of our case and cases in the literature of giant cell tumors of bone involving the lateral skull base.

Study Patient age (y) Patient sex Presentation Location Operative technique/ approach Extent of resection Adjuvant RT Recurrence, follow-up (mo)
Carmody et al, 1983 35 16 M Progressive diplopia, esotropia of R eye Sphenoid bone and sinus, involvement of ST Subfrontal craniotomy STR Y N, 10
Wolfe et al, 1983 19 25 F HA, blindness in L eye, visual field loss in R eye Sphenoid bone and ST Craniotomy (NFS) STR Y N, 168
16 F HA, diplopia, blurred vision Sphenoid bone and sinus w/ involvement of ST, clivus Transseptal biopsy and surgical decompression STR Y N, 96
19 F Diplopia, progressive loss of vision Sphenoid bone and sinus Frontal craniotomy STR Y N, 132
20 M HA, blurred vision, facial nerve palsy, R-sided spastic hemiparesis Sphenoid bone, petrous part of temporal bone, clinoid Craniotomy (NFS) GTR Y N, 12
69 M Memory loss and expressive dysphasia ST Craniotomy (NFS) GTR N N, 9 days
35 M HA ST Craniotomy (NFS) STR x2 Y N, 21
16 M Diplopia, visual field loss Sphenoid bone and ST Craniotomy (NFS) STR Y N, 31
19 M HA, diplopia, L eye pain, R-sided ptosis Sphenoid bone and ST Oropharyngeal biopsy, transsphenoidal biopsy, and decompression STR Y N, 6
Motomochi et al, 1985 36 38 M Chronic R-sided otitis media Temporal bone Temporal craniectomy with Y-shaped incision and retroauricular approach STR Y N, 11
53 M HA, dysphagia, dysarthria Occipital bone Suboccipital craniectomy STR Y N, 26
Kiwit et al, 1986 37 46 F L-sided hearing loss and tinnitus, L facial palsy Petrous part of temporal bone NA GTR N Y, 60
Findlay et al, 1987 23 23 M R-sided hearing loss and otalgia, R facial palsy Temporal bone R ECA ligated preoperatively. R subtemporal approach STR Y N, 8
Tandon et al, 1988 38 33 M NA Temporal bone w/ involvement of sphenoid bone Ablative surgery with Weber–Fergusson incision and transection of zygoma GTR N N, 11
Bertoni et al, 1992 15 63 F Hx of neurofibromatosis Sphenoid and ethmoid bones NA STR Y Y, 34
61 F HA, R-sided hearing loss and facial nerve palsy, unsteadiness, dizziness Petrous part of the temporal bone w/ involvement of occipital and sphenoid bones NA STR Y N, 120
8 F R-sided preauricular swelling Temporal bone NA GTR N Y, 31
24 F NA Occipital bone w/ involvement of petrous part of temporal bone and sphenoid bone NA STR N N, 78
28 F NA Clivus NA STR Y N, 84
58 F NA Occipital bone NA STR N Y, 18
78 F Blindness, prior hx of Paget's disease w/ skull involvement Frontal bone NA GTR N Y, 48
do Amaral et al, 1994 39 14 F HA, visual disturbances Sphenoid bone, involvement of anterior ethmoid sinus, and ST Bicoronal flap w/ frontal craniotomy GTR Y N, 48
Rock et al, 1994 40 32 F L preauricular and temporal pain; hx of Turner syndrome Sphenoid bone w/ involvement of zygoma Preoperative embolization of tumor. Frontotemporal incision w/ preauricular infratemporal extension GTR N N, 6
Saleh et al, 1994 13 36 M R zygomaticotemporal swelling w/ jaw and temporoparietal pain, R-sided hearing loss, and tinnitus Greater wing of sphenoid bone and squamous part of temporal bone Infratemporal fossa approach STR N N, 33
Silvers et al, 1996 41 55 F R-sided otalgia and facial pain (previously dx as TMJ syndrome) w/ R-sided facial mass Temporal bone w/ involvement of glenoid fossa Preauricular infratemporal fossa approach GTR N NA
Büter and Chilla, 1997 42 49 F NA Temporal and sphenoid bones w/ involvement of condylar fossa of the mandibular joint Retroauricular approach NA NA N, 36
Li et al, 1997 43 36 F Prior hx of GCTB of L temporal bone (local recurrence) L glenoid fossa Preauricular middle cranial fossa approach GTR N N, 12
Kattner et al, 1998 44 9 F Frontal cephalgia, diplopia Sphenoid bone and sinus w/ involvement of clivus, cavernous sinus Transseptal transsphenoidal hypophysectomy w/ second resection via transsphenoidal route STR Y N, 12
Omura et al, 1998 45 18 M L TMJ pain and restricted jaw opening Glenoid fossa and condyle Preauricular approach GTR N N, 24
Lee and Lum, 1999 12 45 M L conductive hearing loss Squamous, mastoid, and petrous portions of the L temporal bone Sub- and transtemporal craniotomy w/ dissection of facial nerve NA NA NA
Rosenbloom et al, 1999 46 33 F R aural fullness, pulsatile tinnitus, hearing loss, and otalgia, dysequilibrium Jugular foramen Preauricular infratemporal fossa approach GTR Y NA
Spallone et al, 1999 47 46 M R-sided hearing loss Temporal bone Basal subtemporal transzygomatic approach STR N N, 10
Sharma et al, 2002 25 36 M Frontotemporal HA, R eye proptosis, epistaxis Sphenoid bone Frontozygomaticotemporal approach w/ R maxillectomy and orbital exenteration STR Y N, 120
17 M Recurrent HA, b/l proptosis, blindness Sphenoid bone Anterior transbasal and transnasal transsphenoidal approach w/ b/l medial maxillotomies STR Y N, 24
40 M HA, R eye proptosis w/ partial ophthalmoplegia Temporal bone w/ involvement of sphenoid bone Frontozygomaticotemporal craniotomy and R maxillotomy STR Y N, 24
18 F Occipital HA, hearing loss, facial nerve palsy, dysphagia, ataxia Petrous part of the temporal bone Retromastoid retrosigmoid approach STR Y N, 12
12 F Cervicooccipital pain, R-sided hearing loss, facial nerve palsy Petrous part of the temporal bone Retromastoid retrosigmoid approach GTR N N, 12
Bibas-Bonet et al, 2003 48 8 F R-sided auricular pain, tinnitus, and hearing loss, R facial numbness, dysphagia, hoarseness, diplopia Temporal and sphenoid bones w/ involvement of ST, clivus, and pontine cistern Nonoperative care (per guardians) None Y NA
Chan et al, 2003 49 77 M Recurrent epistaxis, HA, hx of polyostotic Paget's disease Sphenoid bone and sinus Nonoperative care None N N, 7
Harris et al, 2004 50 24 F HA, tenderness and swelling over L inferoparietal and occipital regions Occipital bone w/ intracranial extension Occipital craniotomy GTR N NA
Tang et al, 2003 51 61 F Ataxia, facial palsy, dizziness, scalp mass over L temporozygomatic region L temporal bone w/ expansion into L middle ear Transtemporal approach STR Y NA
Pai et al, 2005 52 26 M Swelling of R temporal region, R-sided hearing loss, and tinnitus Temporal bone w/ large intracranial extension causing uncal herniation Frontotemporal approach GTR N N, 12
Wang et al, 2006 5 64 F Pressure in L ear, discomfort in L TMJ Temporal bone Preauricular approach w/ temporal craniotomy GTR N N, 24
Zorlu et al, 2006 53 14 F Frontal HA, diplopia Sphenoid bone Transsphenoidal approach STR Y Y, 17
Elder et al, 2007 54 2 F Preauricular mass Temporal bone Preoperative embolization of tumor vessels (90% occlusion); craniotomy (NFS) GTR N N, 13
0.13 F Mass in L external auditory canal Temporal bone Craniotomy (NFS) GTR N N, 11
Gupta et al, 2008 55 17 F HA, diplopia, amenorrhea, worsening vision Clivus w/ involvement of ST, sphenoid bone LeFort I osteotomy STR Y N, 24
Matsushige et al, 2008 56 77 F Sudden-onset L temporal HA w/ emesis, horizontal nystagmus, reduced consciousness Temporal bone Subtemporal craniotomy STR N N, 12
Chiarini et al, 2009 57 70 M Swelling of the L TMJ, L-sided hearing loss, and tinnitus, HA Temporal bone, TMJ Craniotomy (NFS) NA N N, 36
Isaacson et al, 2009 20 42 M R-sided hearing loss Temporal bone Middle cranial fossa approach GTR N N, 36
47 M L-sided otalgia and aural fullness. Previous STR of GCTB w/ local recurrence Temporal bone w/ involvement of glenoid fossa, cochlea, and mandibular condyle Revision L temporal craniotomy and infratemporal fossa approach GTR N N, 120
Roeder et al, 2010 27 23 M NA Sphenoid bone NA STR Y N, 63
He et al, 2012 58 34 M R TMJ pain and clicking Temporal bone, TMJ Preauricular approach GTR N N, 6
Iizuka et al, 2012 59 32 M L aural fullness, L-sided hearing loss and tinnitus Temporal bone, TMJ Mastoidectomy w/ transmastoid and middle fossa approach GTR N N, 48
Venkatesh et al, 2012 60 30 M Swelling of L temporal region w/ jaw pain and restricted jaw motion L temporal bone Pre/post-auricular and temporoparietal approaches GTR N N, 12
Zhang et al, 2013 24 44 M Involvement of CNs Temporal bone NA GTR Y N, 21
17 M Proptosis of eye Sphenoid bone NA STR N Y, 19
34 M TMJ pain Temporal bone NA STR N Y, 18
23 M Involvement of CNs Sphenoid bone NA STR Y N, 32
18 M Involvement of CNs Sphenoid bone NA STR Y N, 27
54 F Subcutaneous mass Temporal bone NA GTR N N, 7
27 F Involvement of CNs Temporal bone NA STR Y N, 24
19 M Involvement of CNs Temporal bone NA GTR Y N, 32
19 F HA, emesis Occipital bone NA GTR N N, 31
52 M HA, emesis Temporal bone NA STR Y N, 33
29 M Involvement of CNs Sphenoid bone NA STR N Y, 46
40 F Subcutaneous mass Sphenoid bone NA STR N N, 79
42 F HA, involvement of CNs Sphenoid bone NA GTR N N, 99
25 M HA, involvement of CNs Sphenoid bone NA STR N Y, 2
59 M HA, involvement of CNs Sphenoid bone NA GTR NA NA
32 F HA, involvement of CNs Sphenoid bone NA STR NA NA
33 M Involvement of CNs Temporal bone NA GTR N N, 12
35 F HA, involvement of CNs Temporal bone NA GTR N N, 10
Billingsley et al, 2014 21 44 F R otalgia and auricular fullness Temporal bone Postauricular infratemporal approach w/ subtemporal craniectomy, subtotal petrosectomy and mandibular osteotomy GTR N N, 15
Prasad et al, 2014 8 36 M Preauricular mass, hearing loss and tinnitus, temporoparietal pain Temporal bone w/ involvement of greater wing of sphenoid bone, TMJ Infratemporal fossa type B approach GTR N N, 120
48 F Temporoparietal mass Temporal bone w/ involvement of greater wing of sphenoid bone, TMJ Infratemporal fossa type D approach GTR N N, 108
31 F Hearing loss and tinnitus Temporal bone w/ involvement of TMJ Infratemporal fossa type B approach w/ temporal craniotomy GTR N N, 96
46 M Temporal swelling, temporoparietal pain, hearing loss, and tinnitus Temporal bone Infratemporal fossa type B approach GTR N N, 48
67 M Hearing loss and tinnitus, vertigo Temporal bone Transmastoid exploration w/ extended mastoidectomy STR Y Y, 24
39 M HA, hearing loss Temporal bone w/ involvement of greater wing of sphenoid bone, TMJ Infratemporal fossa type B approach GTR N N, 18
57 M Hearing loss and tinnitus Temporal bone Middle cranial fossa and infratemporal fossa type B approaches GTR N N, 15
Freeman et al, 2016 18 27 M R-sided hearing loss, HA Mastoid portion of temporal bone Cortical mastoidectomy GTR N N, 6
Carlson et al, 2017 61 43 F R-sided TMJ swelling and pain Middle, infratemporal, and glenoid fossae Preauricular infratemporal fossa approach w/ condylectomy and resection of glenoid fossa GTR N N, 166
40 M R-sided hearing loss Middle, infratemporal, and glenoid fossae w/ involvement of mastoid, external auditory canal, and middle ear Middle fossa craniotomy w/ tympanomastoidectomy 1-y later STR Y N, 240
58 M L-sided aural fullness Middle, infratemporal, and glenoid fossae w/ involvement of mastoid, external auditory canal, and middle ear External beam RT (60 Gy) followed by temporal craniotomy w/ tympanomastoidectomy STR N N, 226
60 M L-sided hearing loss, aural fullness, and pain Middle and glenoid fossae w/ involvement of mastoid, external auditory canal, and middle ear Middle fossa craniotomy w/ tympanomastoidectomy GTR N N, 162
57 M L-sided hearing loss, tinnitus, aural fullness Middle and glenoid fossae w/ involvement of mastoid, external auditory canal, and middle ear Middle fossa craniotomy w/ tympanomastoidectomy GTR N N, 156
31 M R-sided TMJ swelling and pain Middle, infratemporal, and glenoid fossae w/ involvement of condyle Preauricular infratemporal fossa approach w/ condylectomy and resection of glenoid fossa GTR N N, 73
42 F Incidental finding Middle, infratemporal, and glenoid fossae Modified infratemporal fossa type B approach GTR N N, 116
49 M L-sided trismus and pain Middle, infratemporal, and glenoid fossae w/ involvement of external auditory canal, and middle ear Middle fossa craniotomy w/ subtotal petrosectomy STR N Y, 12
79 M R-sided hearing loss, aural fullness and otorrhea Middle, infratemporal, and glenoid fossae w/ involvement of external auditory canal, and middle ear Middle fossa craniotomy w/ subtotal petrosectomy GTR N N, 29
54 M R-sided hearing loss and otorrhea Middle, infratemporal, and glenoid fossae w/ involvement of external auditory canal, and middle ear Middle fossa craniotomy w/ subtotal petrosectomy STR N N, 53
39 F R-sided jaw pain and otalgia Middle, infratemporal, and glenoid fossae Middle fossa craniotomy w/ infratemporal fossa dissection GTR N N, 7
Patibandla et al, 2017 62 20 M Hemicranial pain, eyelid droop, vomiting Clivus Transnasal transsphenoidal STR Y N, 3
Current study 22 M HA, L face swelling, L-sided hearing loss Temporal bone w/ involvement of frontal and zygomatic bones Fisch-type approach w/ preauricular incision GTR N N, 2

Abbreviations: b/l, bilateral; CNs, cranial nerves; ECA, external carotid artery; GTR, gross total resection; HA, headache; Hx, history; L, left; M/F, male/female; N, no; NA, not available; NFS, not further specified; R, right; RT, radiotherapy; ST, sella turcica; STR, subtotal resection; TMJ, temporomandibular joint; Y, yes.

Treatment data were reported for 91 patients. Of these patients, 52% (47/91) received gross total resections, 46% (42/91) subtotal resections, and 2% (2/91) did not receive treatment. Of 90 patients with clear documentation, 37% (33/90) received adjuvant radiotherapy following surgical treatment.

Of patients with reported follow-up, 14% (12/86) had local disease recurrence. In addition, of those patients with recurrence, 50% (6/12) had received subtotal resections alone, 25% (3/12) received subtotal resections with adjuvant radiotherapy, and 25% (3/12) received gross total resections alone. Of note, no patients receiving gross total resections with adjuvant radiotherapy developed recurrence ( n  = 4).

Discussion

GCTB is considered a benign, but locally aggressive, neoplasm of bone. These tumors are thought to originate from nonosteogenic neoplastic stromal cells of the bone marrow admixed with multinucleated osteoclastic giant cells. 1 6 GCTBs most commonly affect the epiphyses of long bones, but have also been appreciated in the cranial and facial bones, including the skull base. 6 Although considered a benign lesion, GCTB has a variable natural history, with the risk of local recurrence or distant metastasis being highly unpredictable. Unlike other types of cancer, metastatic spread of GCTB does not carry similar prognostic implications. 17 Despite improved understanding of the underlying cellular and molecular biology underpinning GCTB pathogenesis, our knowledge regarding this tumor's behavioral heterogeneity remains incomplete.

GCTBs of the cranial and facial bones most commonly affect the temporal and sphenoid bones. 14 15 18 19 20 GCTBs of the lateral skull base are often locally aggressive and can invade nearby critical structures. 18 21 It is believed that these tumors arise in these areas because the bones of the mandible, sphenoid, ethmoid, and parts of the temporal bone form largely through the process of endochondral ossification. 22 In contrast, the other cranial bones (i.e., frontal and parietal bones) arise from intramembranous ossification and are less frequently affected by GCTB. 15 22 Patients with GCTB of the temporal bone typically present with headache, conductive hearing loss, aural fullness, preauricular pain, or facial weakness. 18 20 23 In comparison, patients with GCTB of the sphenoid bone may present with symptoms such as headache, facial hypoesthesia, diplopia, blindness, or visual field defects. 18 19

Both CT and MRI are used to identify and characterize GCTB of the lateral skull base. On CT imaging, GCTBs usually present as soft tissue masses of mixed density with higher density spots and destructive expansion into the bone, sometimes sparing cortical bone. 12 18 24 25 CT alone is insufficient for the accurate diagnosis and differentiation of GCTB from other similar-appearing masses or tumors, such as osteitis fibrosa cystica (brown tumor) or giant cell reparative granulomas. 12 18 MRI provides better characterization and delineation of the tumor, showing intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging and hypointensity on T2-weighted sequencing. 18

Surgical removal of GCTB of the skull with complete resection is the current treatment of choice. 8 14 18 The surgical management of GCTB of the lateral skull base can be difficult because of its proximity to critical neurovascular structures. Although gross total resection of the tumor is ideal, this may not be feasible depending on the extent of structural involvement by the tumor. In this setting, partial resection (i.e., maximal safe resection) followed by adjuvant radiotherapy may be a reasonable alternative. 8 18 26 27 A recent systematic literature review of GCTBs involving the skull reported 94 patients who underwent surgery, with 37 of those patients having received adjuvant radiotherapy. 24 In a subanalysis within this review, in 62 patients for whom survival data was available, the 5-year overall survival rate was 84%, with an event-free survival rate (i.e., survival rate without tumor recurrence) of 61.3%. 24 All 16 patients who had gross total resection (with or without adjuvant radiotherapy) were alive and event-free at 5 years. 24 In comparison, patients treated with subtotal resection and adjuvant radiotherapy ( n  = 33) had an overall survival of 90.3% and event-free survival of 70.1%. 24 Patients treated with subtotal resection without subsequent radiotherapy ( n  = 13) had an overall survival rate of 50% and an event-free rate of 15.4% at 5 years. 24 Because of the difficulty associated with the surgical management of GCTBs involving the lateral skull base, complications can arise during surgical resection (e.g., bleeding or the compromise of critical neural structures). Nevertheless, current evidence strongly suggests that gross total resection results in improved local control and survival outcomes. 18

Adjuvant therapy is recommended for cases where complete resection cannot be achieved. 25 Radiation therapy is discussed in the literature as a possible treatment option following subtotal resection. Small retrospective studies and case reports have suggested a control benefit and marked symptom relief with adjuvant radiation therapy. Malone et al 26 reported local control in 19 of 21 patients treated with radiation therapy, with a mean follow-up time of 15.4 years. Most patients received 35 Gy in 15 fractions delivered daily over 3 weeks. 26 Other series have also demonstrated favorable local control rates, with Roeder et al 27 reporting local control in four of five patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy to a median dose of 64 Gy using conventional fractionation. There are also reports on the use of Gamma Knife (stereotactic) radiosurgery in the treatment of GCTB of the skull base, with marked reduction in tumor size and a meaningful disease-free interval. 28 Although adjuvant radiation therapy appears to offer a control benefit, the data are limited by their retrospective nature, small patient numbers, and short follow-up intervals. Given these limitations, general consensus regarding optimal dose and fractionation regimens are lacking. Moreover, there is concern that radiotherapy may contribute to malignant transformation. 20 25 This risk may be minimized by use of conventional fractionation regimens without compromising tumor control; however, longer follow-up is needed to better characterize this risk. 15 25

Recently, several studies have investigated the role of targeted therapy with denosumab, a fully humanized monoclonal receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANK-L) antibody, which has shown promise as a potential effective chemotherapeutic treatment option in patients with GCTB. 29 The osteoclastic giant cells responsible for local bony destruction and invasion in GCTB have been shown to ubiquitously express RANK receptor. 29 30 31 Current evidence suggests that the neoplastic stromal cells promote the growth, proliferation, and osteolytic activity of the multinucleated osteoclastic giant cells through the overexpression of RANK-L, thus driving local bony destruction. 30 32 With ongoing clinical trials studying the effectiveness of denosumab in the treatment of GCTBs, the role of monoclonal therapy in GCTBs of the skull base has not yet been fully characterized. 31 33 34 Current evidence for the management of GCTBs of the skull recommends complete surgical resection with negative margins to achieve the highest rate of cure and lowest risk of recurrence. 4 16 Nevertheless, the inhibition of this pathway with a monoclonal RANK-L antibody may limit bony destruction and tumor progression, thereby making these tumors of the lateral skull base more amenable to complete surgical resection and therefore decreasing the morbidity and mortality of this disease.

Conclusion

The skull is a relatively rare location for a GCTB to occur. When this tumor is found, it is normally found in the temporal or sphenoid bones. Although GCTB is a benign tumor, it is also locally aggressive and has the ability to recur or rarely metastasize. Gross total resection is the current treatment of choice in GCTB of the skull, but it can be difficult to achieve due to the proximity of the tumor to important neural and vascular structures. Subtotal resection with adjuvant radiotherapy may be a good alternative treatment in such cases. Although radiotherapy has been the adjuvant therapy of choice in GCTB treatment, recent literature shows that denosumab, a RANK-L antibody, may also prove to be effective in treating the tumor. Future studies should evaluate the efficacy of different adjuvant therapies used to treat partially resected GCTB of the lateral skull base.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Kristin Kraus, M.Sc., for her assistance with preparation of this article.

Disclosure None.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the University of Utah.

Patient Consent

The patient/legal guardian/next of kin has consented to the submission of the case report for submission to the Journal of Neurological Surgery Reports.

References

  • 1.Larsson S E, Lorentzon R, Boquist L. Giant-cell tumor of bone. A demographic, clinical, and histopathological study of all cases recorded in the Swedish Cancer Registry for the years 1958 through 1968. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975;57(02):167–173. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Baena-Ocampo L del C, Ramirez-Perez E, Linares-Gonzalez L M, Delgado-Chavez R. Epidemiology of bone tumors in Mexico City: retrospective clinicopathologic study of 566 patients at a referral institution. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2009;13(01):16–2. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2008.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Beebe-Dimmer J L, Cetin K, Fryzek J P, Schuetze S M, Schwartz K.The epidemiology of malignant giant cell tumors of bone: an analysis of data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program (1975-2004) Rare Tumors 2009102e52. Doi: 10.4081/rt.2009.e52 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Campanacci M, Baldini N, Boriani S, Sudanese A. Giant-cell tumor of bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69(01):106–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang Y, Honda K, Suzuki S, Ishikawa K. Giant cell tumor at the lateral skull base. Am J Otolaryngol. 2006;27(01):64–67. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2005.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Werner M. Giant cell tumour of bone: morphological, biological and histogenetical aspects. Int Orthop. 2006;30(06):484–489. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0215-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mendenhall W M, Zlotecki R A, Scarborough M T, Gibbs C P, Mendenhall N P. Giant cell tumor of bone. Am J Clin Oncol. 2006;29(01):96–99. doi: 10.1097/01.coc.0000195089.11620.b7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Prasad S C, Piccirillo E, Nuseir A et al. Giant cell tumors of the skull base: case series and current concepts. Audiol Neurootol. 2014;19(01):12–21. doi: 10.1159/000355701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Qureshi S S, Puri A, Agarwal M, Desai S, Jambhekar N. Recurrent giant cell tumor of bone with simultaneous regional lymph node and pulmonary metastases. Skeletal Radiol. 2005;34(04):225–228. doi: 10.1007/s00256-004-0824-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Balke M, Schremper L, Gebert C et al. Giant cell tumor of bone: treatment and outcome of 214 cases. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2008;134(09):969–978. doi: 10.1007/s00432-008-0370-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dahlin D C, Cupps R E, Johnson E W., Jr Giant-cell tumor: a study of 195 cases. Cancer. 1970;25(05):1061–1070. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197005)25:5<1061::aid-cncr2820250509>3.0.co;2-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lee H J, Lum C. Giant-cell tumor of the skull base. Neuroradiology. 1999;41(04):305–307. doi: 10.1007/s002340050753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Saleh E A, Taibah A K, Naguib Met al. Giant cell tumor of the lateral skull base: a case report Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994111(3 Pt 1):314–318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shen Y, Ma C, Wang L, Li J, Wu Y, Sun J. Surgical management of giant cell tumors in temporomandibular joint region involving lateral skull base: a multidisciplinary approach. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74(11):2295–2311. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bertoni F, Unni K K, Beabout J W, Ebersold M J. Giant cell tumor of the skull. Cancer. 1992;70(05):1124–1132. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920901)70:5<1124::aid-cncr2820700517>3.0.co;2-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Klenke F M, Wenger D E, Inwards C Y, Rose P S, Sim F H. Giant cell tumor of bone: risk factors for recurrence. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(02):591–599. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1501-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wong R H, Thakral B, Watkin W G, Merrell R, Wong A K, Farhat H I. Intracranial, intra-axial metastatic giant cell tumor of bone: case report and review of literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;117:40–43. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Freeman J L, Oushy S, Schowinsky J, Sillau S, Youssef A S. Invasive giant cell tumor of the lateral skull base: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and case illustration. World Neurosurg. 2016;96:47–57. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.05.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wolfe J T, III, Scheithauer B W, Dahlin D C. Giant-cell tumor of the sphenoid bone. Review of 10 cases. J Neurosurg. 1983;59(02):322–327. doi: 10.3171/jns.1983.59.2.0322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Isaacson B, Berryhill W, Arts H A. Giant-cell tumors of the temporal bone: management strategies. Skull Base. 2009;19(04):291–301. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1115324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Billingsley J T, Wiet R M, Petruzzelli G J, Byrne R. A locally invasive giant cell tumor of the skull base: case report. J Neurol Surg Rep. 2014;75(01):e175–e179. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1378153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Morriss-Kay G M.Derivation of the mammalian skull vault J Anat 2001199(Pt 1-2):143–151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Findlay J M, Chiasson D, Hudson A R, Chui M. Giant-cell tumor of the middle cranial fossa. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1987;66(06):924–928. doi: 10.3171/jns.1987.66.6.0924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhang Z, Xu J, Yao Y et al. Giant cell tumors of the skull: a series of 18 cases and review of the literature. J Neurooncol. 2013;115(03):437–444. doi: 10.1007/s11060-013-1242-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sharma R R, Mahapatra A K, Pawar S J, Sousa J, Dev E J. Craniospinal giant cell tumors: clinicoradiological analysis in a series of 11 cases. J Clin Neurosci. 2002;9(01):41–50. doi: 10.1054/jocn.2001.0963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Malone S, O'Sullivan B, Catton C, Bell R, Fornasier V, Davis A. Long-term follow-up of efficacy and safety of megavoltage radiotherapy in high-risk giant cell tumors of bone. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;33(03):689–694. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00159-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Roeder F, Timke C, Zwicker Fet al. Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in benign giant cell tumors--a single institution case series and a short review of the literature Radiat Oncol 2010518. Doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-5-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kim I Y, Jung S, Jung T Y et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery for giant cell tumor of the petrous bone. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114(02):185–189. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Xu S F, Adams B, Yu X C, Xu M. Denosumab and giant cell tumour of bone-a review and future management considerations. Curr Oncol. 2013;20(05):e442–e447. doi: 10.3747/co.20.1497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Huang L, Xu J, Wood D J, Zheng M H. Gene expression of osteoprotegerin ligand, osteoprotegerin, and receptor activator of NF-kappaB in giant cell tumor of bone: possible involvement in tumor cell-induced osteoclast-like cell formation. Am J Pathol. 2000;156(03):761–767. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)64942-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Thomas D M. RANKL, denosumab, and giant cell tumor of bone. Curr Opin Oncol. 2012;24(04):397–403. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e328354c129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.López-Pousa A, Martín Broto J, Garrido T, Vázquez J. Giant cell tumour of bone: new treatments in development. Clin Transl Oncol. 2015;17(06):419–430. doi: 10.1007/s12094-014-1268-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chawla S, Henshaw R, Seeger L et al. Safety and efficacy of denosumab for adults and skeletally mature adolescents with giant cell tumour of bone: interim analysis of an open-label, parallel-group, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(09):901–908. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70277-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Thomas D, Henshaw R, Skubitz K et al. Denosumab in patients with giant-cell tumour of bone: an open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(03):275–280. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70010-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Carmody R F, Rickles D J, Johnson S F. Giant cell tumor of the sphenoid bone. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1983;7(02):370–373. doi: 10.1097/00004728-198304000-00038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Motomochi M, Handa Y, Makita Y, Hashi K. Giant cell tumor of the skull. Surg Neurol. 1985;23(01):25–30. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(85)90155-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kiwit J CW, Schober R, Nicola N, Schirmer M, Wechsler W. Osteoclastomas of the petrous bone. Surg Neurol. 1986;26(01):59–62. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(86)90064-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tandon D A, Deka R C, Chaudhary C, Misra N K. Giant cell tumour of the temporosphenoidal region. J Laryngol Otol. 1988;102(05):449–451. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100105316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.do Amaral C MR, Julio G L, Cardoso L AA, Bueno M de C. Craniofacial treatment of giant-cell tumors of the sphenoid bone. J Craniofac Surg. 1994;5(04):254–256. doi: 10.1097/00001665-199409000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rock J P, Mahmood A, Cramer H B. Giant cell tumor of the skull base. Am J Otol. 1994;15(02):268–272. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Silvers A R, Som P M, Brandwein M, Chong J L, Shah D. The role of imaging in the diagnosis of giant cell tumor of the skull base. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;17(07):1392–1395. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Büter J J, Chilla R. Giant cell tumor of the temporal bone (osteoclastoma) Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1997;254(06):298–300. doi: 10.1007/BF02905992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Li K K, Ung F, McKenna M J, Keith D A. Combined middle cranial fossa and preauricular approach to the temporomandibular joint: report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;55(08):851–852. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(97)90348-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kattner K A, Stroink A, Gupta K, Fukushima T, Li C. Giant cell tumor of the sphenoid bone. Skull Base Surg. 1998;8(02):93–97. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1058582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Omura S, Mizuki N, Bukawa H, Fujita K. Diffuse variant tenosynovial giant cell tumor of the temporomandibular joint: report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;56(08):991–996. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(98)90665-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Rosenbloom J S, Storper I S, Aviv J E, Hacein-Bey L, Bruce J N. Giant cell tumors of the jugular foramen. Am J Otolaryngol. 1999;20(03):176–179. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0709(99)90068-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Spallone A, Flores G L, Zaldivar L O, Estupinan B. Giant cell tumor (osteoclastoma) of the petrous bone: case report. Skull Base Surg. 1999;9(02):155–159. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1058163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bibas-Bonet H, Fauze R A, Lavado M G, Páez R O, Nieman J. Garcin syndrome resulting from a giant cell tumor of the skull base in a child. Pediatr Neurol. 2003;28(05):392–395. doi: 10.1016/s0887-8994(03)00009-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chan J, Gannon F H, Thompson L DR. Malignant giant cell tumor of the sphenoid. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2003;7(02):100–105. doi: 10.1053/adpa.2003.50020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Harris A E, Beckner M E, Barnes L, Kassam A, Horowitz M. Giant cell tumor of the skull: a case report and review of the literature. Surg Neurol. 2004;61(03):274–277. doi: 10.1016/S0090-3019(03)00428-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tang J Y, Wang C K, Su Y C, Yang S F, Huang M Y, Huang C J. MRI appearance of giant cell tumor of the lateral skull base: a case report. Clin Imaging. 2003;27(01):27–30. doi: 10.1016/s0899-7071(02)00520-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pai S B, Lalitha R M, Prasad K, Rao S G, Harish K.Giant cell tumor of the temporal bone--a case report BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord 200558. Doi: 10.1186/1472-6815-5-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zorlu F, Selek U, Soylemezoglu F, Oge K. Malignant giant cell tumor of the skull base originating from clivus and sphenoid bone. J Neurooncol. 2006;76(02):149–152. doi: 10.1007/s11060-005-4343-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Elder J B, Berry C, Gonzalez-Gomez I, Kreger M D, McComb J G.Giant cell tumor of the skull in pediatric patients. Report of two cases J Neurosurg 2007107(1, Suppl):69–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gupta R, Mohindra S, Mahore A, Mathuriya S N, Radotra B D. Giant cell tumour of the clivus. Br J Neurosurg. 2008;22(03):447–449. doi: 10.1080/02688690701818943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Matsushige T, Nakaoka M, Yahara K et al. Giant cell tumor of the temporal bone with intratumoral hemorrhage. J Clin Neurosci. 2008;15(08):923–927. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2007.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Chiarini L, Figurelli S, Ghidini A et al. An unusual case of giant cell tumour involving the middle cranial fossa, originating from soft tissues of the temporomandibular joint. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2009;151(12):1685–1687. doi: 10.1007/s00701-009-0296-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.He D, Yang C, Shen G et al. Navigation-guided resection for a tenosynovial giant cell tumor involving the temporomandibular joint and skull base. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(02):521–523. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824cd4bd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Iizuka T, Furukawa M, Ishii H et al. Giant cell tumor of the temporal bone with direct invasion into the middle ear and skull base: a case report. Case Rep Otolaryngol. 2012;2012:690148. doi: 10.1155/2012/690148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Venkatesh M D, Vijaya N, Girish N, Galagali J R. Giant cell tumor of temporal bone: a case report. Med J Armed Forces India. 2012;68(04):392–394. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2012.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Carlson M L, Osetinsky L M, Alon E E, Inwards C Y, Lane J I, Moore E J. Tenosynovial giant cell tumors of the temporomandibular joint and lateral skull base: review of 11 cases. Laryngoscope. 2017;127(10):2340–2346. doi: 10.1002/lary.26435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Patibandla M R, Thotakura A K, Rao M N et al. Clival giant cell tumor - a rare case report and review of literature with respect to current line of management. Asian J Neurosurg. 2017;12(01):78–81. doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.145112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurological Surgery Reports are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES