Table 4.
Study | Study Design/Risk of Bias Scale | Main Source of Risk of Bias | Qualitya within study design category | Qualitya across study designs |
---|---|---|---|---|
Manning 2002(32) | Randomized Controlled Trial/Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool | Incomplete Outcome Data, selective outcome reporting, significant baseline imbalance | Low | Moderate |
Machado 2008(30) | Randomized Controlled Trial/Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool | Low risk of bias | High | High |
Yilmaz 2011(31) | Randomized Controlled Trial/Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool | No description of randomization, allocation concealment or blinding | Moderate | High |
Szekac 2000(24) | Observational Study/Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, Cohort study | Low risk of bias | High | Moderate |
Monster 2000(9) | Observational Study/Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, Case-Control study | Low risk of bias | High | Moderate |
Fencki 2003(23) | Observational Study/Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, Cohort study | Low risk of bias | High | Moderate |
Agarwal 2005(11) | Observational Study/Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, Cohort study | Low risk of bias | High | Moderate |
Schopick 2009(12) | Observational Study/Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, Cohort study | Ensuring outcome was not present at beginning | Moderate | Low |
Fung 2011(10) | Observational Study/Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, Cohort study | Low risk of bias | High | Moderate |
Kaygusz 2012(41) | Observational Study/Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, Cohort study | Minimal description of cohort, did not ensure outcome was not present at beginning | Low | Very low |
Vitolo 2015(42) | Observational Study/Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, Cohort study | Minimal description of cohort and exposure | Low | Very low |
Manning 2002(32) | Observational Study/Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, Cohort study | Ensuring outcome was not present at beginning | Moderate | Low |
Each study was given a very low, low, moderate or high quality designation based on the risk of bias (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment for Randomized Controlled Trials) and the hierarchy of study methodology