Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Stroke. 2018 May 14;49(6):1557–1562. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017073

Imaging Endophenotypes of Stroke as a Target for Genetic Studies

Xueqiu Jian 1, Myriam Fornage 1
PMCID: PMC5970992  NIHMSID: NIHMS961738  PMID: 29760278

Introduction

Stroke is a heterogeneous disease leading to death of neural tissue and often resulting in the loss of motor and cognitive function. It is the fifth leading cause of death and a leading cause of severe long-term disability in the United States.1 Most strokes (~80-90%) are caused by an acute interruption of the brain arterial blood supply due to vascular occlusion, leading to brain tissue ischemia. Approximately 10-20% of strokes are caused by blood vessel rupture, leading to hemorrhage. While a growing number of genetic loci have been identified for the major stroke risk factors, the genetic architecture of stroke and its subtypes remains largely uncharacterized. The use of imaging measures as endophenotypes in genetic studies of stroke is leading to new discoveries and may provide a better understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying stroke etiology.

The concept of endophenotype was first developed in the early 1970’s by Gottesman and Shields for schizophrenia research.2 An endophenotype was originally defined as a quantitative characteristic of the disease, which cannot be observed by the naked eye (“Endo-” means internal or inside; “Pheno-” means showing or appearing).3 It is not a risk factor but rather an expression of the underlying disease liability. Gottesman and Gould identified six criteria that define an endophenotype (Table 1).3 Because endophenotypes are typically quantitative and lie in the causal pathway to the disease but are closer to the gene action than the clinical phenotype,3 they provide greater power than their corresponding clinical phenotypes in gene discovery, as has been shown in the genetic study of other complex diseases.4, 5 This review will discuss selected imaging endophenotypes of stroke. Genetic studies referenced in this article mostly focus on genome-wide association studies (GWASs) in large population-based samples.

Table 1.

Criteria defining an endophenotype3

1. The endophenotype is associated with the disease in the population
2. The endophenotype is heritable
3. The endophenotype is primarily state-independent (can be measured in both affected and unaffected)
4. Within families, endophenotype and disease co-segregate.
5. The endophenotype measured in affected family members is present in non-affected family members at a higher rate than in the general population
6. The endophenotype is a trait that can be measured reliably, and ideally is more strongly associated with the disease of interest than with other related conditions

Brain MRI Endophenotypes of Cerebral Small Vessel Disease

Cerebral small vessel arteriopathy manifests itself as heterogeneous lesions in the brain parenchyma detectable by MRI, including white matter hyperintensities, infarcts or lacunes, dilated perivascular spaces, and cerebral microbleeds.6

White matter hyperintensities (WMH) are common neuroradiological abnormalities in the elderly and are detectable by T2-weighted (T2W) and fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) structural MRI. WMH have been widely recognized as significant predictors of stroke, dementia, and mortality.7 Genetic factors play a significant role in WMH susceptibility, with heritability estimates ranging from 55% to 80%.810. A GWAS of WMH burden conducted in middle-aged to elderly individuals who were free of dementia and stroke and were from community-based cohorts identified a locus on chromosome 17q25 near TRIM47.11 This finding has been confirmed in several independent studies1214 and in a subsequent, expanded GWAS including participants of European, African, Hispanic, and Asian descent.15 In the latter GWAS, four novel loci were also identified on chr10q24 (PDCD11/NEURL/SH3PXD2A), chr2p21 (HAAO), chr1q22 (PMF1) and chr2p16 (EFEMP1).15 Remarkably, 4 of the 5 loci encompass genes that have been implicated in tumors of the glial cells, including gliomas, astrocytomas, and glioblastomas, suggesting that inflammatory and glial proliferative pathways may be involved in the development of WMH in addition to previously-proposed ischemic mechanisms. Interestingly, chr1q22 (PMF1) has also been identified as a risk locus for non-lobar intracerebral hemorrhage16, as well as all stroke and ischemic stroke17; and chr10q24 (SH3PXD2A) has been identified in a recent GWAS of all stroke17, further demonstrating the utility of neuroimaging endophenotypes in the search for stroke genes. A genetic risk score constructed from 18 SNPs most significantly associated with WMH in the latest multi-ethnic GWAS15 was recently evaluated for association with lacunar stroke, cardioembolic stroke, and large vessel stroke in cases obtained from hospital admissions in Europe and Australia and ancestry-matched controls.18 There was strong evidence that genetic variants associated with WMH also influence risk of lacunar stroke but not that of other stroke subtypes, supporting the notion that the two disorders share common pathological processes possibly affecting the small vessels of the brain.

A recent GWAS of WMH in 3,670 stroke patients from the United Kingdom, United States, Australia, Belgium, and Italy did not identify genome-wide significant loci.18 However, meta-analyses of results with those derived from the large GWAS from the CHARGE consortium15 identified 4 novel loci reaching genome-wide significance: rs72934505 (NBEAL1); rs941898 (EVL); rs962888 (EFTUD2/C1QL1); and rs9515201 (COL4A2). Interestingly, COL4A2 and the adjacent COL4A1, encode alpha subunits of type IV collagen the major structural component of basement membranes and have been implicated in hereditary cerebral small vessel disease and intracerebral hemorrhage.19, 20

Because common variants detectable by GWAS have been estimated to account for at most a quarter of the WMH phenotypic variance21, genetic studies of WMH are now focusing on rare variants and other “omics”.22 An analysis of 250,000 mostly rare to low frequency variants, mapping to coding regions of the genome (exome) and genotyped in 20,719 participants of European and African ancestry, showed that rare non-synonymous variants in MRPL38, located in the previously identified chr17q25 locus, are associated with WMH independently of the known GWAS signal (manuscript submitted). MRPL38 encodes a mitochondrial ribosomal protein. Gene mutations resulting in impaired mitochondrial translation have been implicated in severe, early onset neurological disease.23 Future whole genome sequence analysis will provide a more complete picture of the role of rare variants in WMH susceptibility.24

MRI-defined brain Infarcts (BI) are common in the elderly and typically occur in the absence of clinically recognized stroke symptoms. Like WMH, they are associated with future incident cognitive decline and stroke. The majority (>90%) of BI are small subcortical brain infarcts (SSBI) 3 to 15 mm in size, which are also referred to as lacunes. The remaining 10% are larger subcortical infarcts or cortical infarcts.25 A GWAS of covert MRI infarcts in 9,401 participants from 6 community-based cohorts (mean age: 69 years; 19.4% had at least one MRI infarct) identified novel associations in the MACROD2/FLRT3 region of chromosome 20p12.26 A more recent trans-ethnic meta-analysis of GWAS in 20,949 participants from 5 ethnicities has been completed. Both MRI-defined BI (N=3,726) and SSBI (N=2,021) were analyzed. Two loci reached genome wide significance for association with BI: FBN2 and LINC00539/ZDHHC20. However, associations were not replicated in a smaller independent sample of 3,143 participants, including 1,134 with BI and 543 with SBBI. The inconsistent findings among studies and the failure of replication efforts may not only be attributable to insufficient power, genetic heterogeneity across ethnic groups and the use of different definition of BI (e.g., diameter threshold may vary across studies) may also in part explain these observations. These loci did not appear to associate with ischemic stroke and pathologically defined BI, warranting additional studies to validate these findings and further examine the shared etiology between covert and overt brain vascular disease.22

Recent application of high resolution structural MRI and ongoing development of semi-automated detection techniques have allowed assessment of cortical cerebral microinfarcts (diameter <1 mm).27 The cause of these brain abnormalities is likely heterogeneous. Cerebral microinfarcts have been associated with dementia, cognitive decline, and motor function impairment.28 The genetic basis of cerebral microinfarcts is unknown.

Perivascular spaces (also known as Virchow–Robin spaces) are fluid-filled spaces that follow the typical course of penetrating vessels through the brain parenchyma. They appear either linear if imaged parallel to the course of the vessel or round or ovoid (diameter < 3 mm in general) if imaged perpendicular to the course of the vessel, with hyperintense signal on T2 images.29 Enlarged perivascular spaces (EPVS) have recently emerged as markers of cerebral small vessel disease.29, 30 The causes of EPVS remain unclear but impaired blood–brain barrier might play a role.31 A genetic basis for EPVS was suggested by recognition of a familial occurrence perivascular space dilations in children with neurodevelopmental abnormalities.32 However, no large-scale GWAS of EPVS has been reported to date. In a two-stage imaging genetic study of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in 2,875 children from the general population aged 7 to 10 years, rs273342, a SNP mapping to MAPRE2 at 18q12.1 locus, was significantly associated with EPVS in the basal ganglia.33 Large-scale studies such as GWASs are warranted to increase the power to uncover the genetic architecture of EPVS and understand its relationship to small vessel stroke.

Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are small, round, or ovoid perivascular hemosiderin deposits detectable by T2* Gradient-Recall Echo (GRE) or Susceptibility-Weighted (SWI) MRI. They occur in 5% to 21% of apparently healthy people, but are more frequent in patients with ischemic stroke (30-40%) or with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) (>60%).34 CMBs located in deep subcortical or infratentorial regions are typically associated with hypertensive vascular disease, while those located in lobar regions are usually associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy.35 A systemic review and meta-analysis of candidate gene associations showed that the APOE ε4 allele is associated with a higher risk of microbleeds at any location but the association was stronger with strictly lobar CMBs.36 In a GWAS of ICH, APOE ε4 was associated with both lobar and deep ICH.37 To date, no GWAS of microbleeds has been reported.

White matter microstructure and Cerebral Small Vessel Disease

White matter microstructure can be assessed by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) are commonly used DTI metrics to quantify changes in white matter integrity that are not typically detected on conventional MRI.38 These changes have been shown to represent early predictors of the course of age-related white matter degeneration with time and to precede irreversible white matter lesions (WMH).39, 40 In the Rotterdam study, a large population-based cohort of middle-aged and older adults, measures of white matter microstructural integrity were associated with an increased risk of stroke, independent of cardiovascular risk factors and MRI-defined white matter lesions and lacunar infarcts.41 Heritability of whole brain FA and regional FA was recently estimated to range between 0.66 and 0.90.42 A GWAS of global FA in a sample of 776 Mexican-American members of extended pedigrees identified 5 mostly intergenic loci but no replication was attempted as part of this study.43 Additional genetic studies in larger samples are needed to uncover the genetic basis of white matter integrity and its role in stroke susceptibility.

Carotid Ultrasound Imaging Endophenotypes of Large Artery Stroke

Carotid atherosclerosis, as a source of microemboli or a cause of ischemia due to flow limiting stenosis, is responsible for 15-20% of strokes. Carotid intima media thickness (cIMT) and carotid plaque burden can be assessed using non-invasive high resolution ultrasound techniques.44 cIMT reflects the thickening of the inner two layers of the carotid artery wall – the intima and media, and plaque represents established atherosclerotic disease in the lumen. Asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) is common in the general population, with prevalence estimated at up to 7.5% for moderate ACS and up to 3.5% for severe ACS.45 Presence of carotid artery plaque may be even higher, ranging between 15-35% of adults.46, 47 Both measures have been associated with an increased risk of future stroke48, 49 and are influenced by genetic factors.50 A GWAS of subclinical atherosclerosis in over 40,000 individuals of European ancestry identified three genome-wide significant loci associated with cIMT (8q24: ZHX2; 19q13: APOC1; 8q23.1: PINX1) and two with carotid plaque (7q22: PIK3CG; 4q31: EDNRA).50 In the largest GWAS of stroke to date, the EDNRA locus was significantly associated with large artery stroke, exclusive of other stroke subtypes.17 These findings underscore the utility of endophenotypes for uncovering possible biological mechanisms of stroke pathophysiology.

Endophenotypes of Cardioembolic and Cryptogenic Stroke

Cardioembolic stroke (CES) accounts for 15-30% of all ischemic strokes, while undetermined (cryptogenic) stroke accounts for 30-40%.51, 52 Atrial Fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia, is a major cause of CES.53 To date, at least 30 genetic loci have been associated with AF.54 Two of these are among the first and most consistently identified ischemic stroke loci (4q25: PITX2 and 16q22: ZFHX3), with ZFHX3 exclusively associated with CES.55 Thus, information about the genetic architecture of AF may be relevant to stroke. This is also supported by the reported association of a comprehensive AF polygenic risk score with stroke, more specifically CES.56

Thrombus formation in the left atrial appendage (LAA) in patients with AF is the most common cause of cardioembolic events.57 Measures of LAA structure and function can be assessed by echocardiography (transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) or transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE)) and may represent valuable endophenotypes of cardioembolic or cryptogenic stroke.58 Three anatomical features of the LAA have been associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke in patient with AF: shape, orifice size, and fibrosis.59 In addition to LAA structure, LAA function, commonly assessed by echocardiographic measurement of LAA blood flow velocities, has also been correlated with stroke risk, with lower velocities associated with greater ischemic stroke risk and thrombus formation.59 Studies are needed to investigate the genetic basis of LAA structure and function and the possible role of the underlying genes in determining ischemic stroke risk, particularly cardioembolic and cryptogenic stroke.

Recent data indicate that left atrial thromboembolism can occur even in the absence of AF. Hence, a broader concept considering atrial dysfunction, or atrial cardiopathy, as a stroke risk factor has been recently proposed.60 Biomarkers of atrial cardiopathy may, thus, represent valuable endophenotypes of stroke, especially embolic stroke.

Left atrial size measured by echocardiography has been associated with age-adjusted ischemic stroke risk in the Framingham Heart Study61 and in the ethnically diverse Northern Manhattan Stroke Study (NOMASS).62 Linkage analysis in 100 Caribbean Hispanic families followed by association analysis in 825 participants from NOMASS identified a region on chr.17p10 harboring multiple susceptibility genes implicated in heart structure (NTN1, MYH10, COX10, and MYOCD).63 In a recent meta-analysis of GWAS of left atrial size from 21 studies with up to 30,201 individuals, no association reached genome-wide significance for left atrial size.64 The strongest association was with rs2292864 (P=5.15×10−7), located in an intron of ITGB3, encoding the beta chain beta 3 of integrin, a cell-surface receptor involved in cell adhesion and cell-surface mediated signaling. Whether genetic variants in genes implicated in left atrial size to date are associated with stroke has not been examined.

Increased P-wave terminal force in lead V1 (PTFV1) is the most commonly used electrocardiographic marker of left atrial abnormality, including left atrial fibrosis, elevated filling pressures, and dilatation.65 In a recent meta-analysis, increased PTFV1, defined either as a continuous or categorical variable, was associated with an 18-22% increased risk of incident ischemic stroke.66 In the NOMASS, there was no association of PTFV1 with noncardioembolic stroke subtypes.67 Similarly, in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities studies, this association was limited to non-lacunar stroke.68 To our knowledge, no genetic studies of PTFV1 have been carried out to date. Of note, a newly-identified genetic locus for CES, NKX2-5, has also been previously reported associated with ECG-defined PR interval, a marker of atrial and atrioventricular nodal conduction,69 but not consistently with AF.17 This result further highlights the relevance of identifying genes underlying atrial cardiopathy to understand stroke pathogenesis.

Integrating multiple endophenotypes to study the genetics of stroke

Investigating stroke endophenotypes individually may not provide the most efficient or powerful approach to dissecting the genetic architecture of stroke. Because many endophenotypes have a vascular origin, they tend to be correlated with each other, some are even highly correlated. For example, microbleeds are associated with SSBI independently of WMH;70 most incident lacunes are located at the edge of WMH.71 Thus, a Bonferroni correction applied to multiple GWASs of correlated traits may be too conservative and may reduce statistical power. In addition, while endophenotypes of SVD are generally correlated, only one (or few) endophenotype may reflect a specific etiological component of the disease rather than capturing the global effect of disease on the brain. The recent discovery of the FOXF2 locus via GWAS of incident all stroke, regardless of subtype, suggest that there may be an advantage in applying strategies of gene discovery that target global mechanisms of brain dysfunction.72 To increase the power to identify genetic variants associated with stroke, efforts should be made in (1) developing statistical methods accounting for correlation among traits, such as multivariate methods or the combination of univariate analyses results correcting for phenotypic correlations;73 or (2) integrating multiple specific endophenotypes into a common one, either binary or ordinal. For example, Klarenbeek et al. developed a simple ordinal total SVD score ranging from 0-4 by counting the presence of four SVD endophenotypes in an individual: lacunes, WMH, perivascular spaces, and microbleeds.74 Various studies showed that a higher score predict stroke severity75, 76 and cognitive decline7779 and is associated with SVD risk factors such as hypertension, age, and smoking.74, 80, 81 These data indicate that total SVD score may be a better measure of the total SVD burden than individual measures and, thus, could be used in large-scale genetic studies not only to increase statistical power but also to ease the burden of multiple testing. However, the ordinal score only considers four of the SVD endophenotypes and assigns equal weight to each one, thus leaving sufficient room for improvement, e.g., by including additional components such as SSBI and brain atrophy, or weighting each trait differentially based on its prevalence in the population, the location in the brain, or the number and size of the damage.

Conclusion and Perspectives

Genome-wide genetic studies of stroke conducted to date have required large sample sizes and have yielded a limited (albeit growing) number of loci in comparison to other complex diseases. Genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity pose a major challenge to the elucidation of the genetic basis of stroke. Endophenotypes such as those described above represent a prospect for understanding stroke pathophysiology, improving stroke diagnosis, and developing therapeutic targets for stroke treatment. The ability to measure them quantitatively, reliably, and non-invasively in large population samples provides an opportunity to improve statistical power to detect small genetic effects over that of the binary disease trait. So far, use of stroke endophenotypes has been successful in the discovery of genes associated with WMH, whereas more work remains to be done for others. Different yet related measures can be used to study the mechanisms of different stroke subtypes or uncover global mechanisms common to all stroke subtypes. Stroke gene discovery may also be benefit from integrating multiple endophenotypes into a composite measure or employing longitudinal design to assess genetic underpinnings of disease progression.

Acknowledgments

Sources of Funding

The authors are supported in part by grant R01-NS087541 from the National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

Disclosures

None

References

  • 1.Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135:e146–e603. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gottesman II, Shields J. Genetic theorizing and schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. 1973;122:15–30. doi: 10.1192/bjp.122.1.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gottesman II, Gould TD. The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: etymology and strategic intentions. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160:636–645. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.4.636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gur RE, Calkins ME, Gur RC, Horan WP, Nuechterlein KH, Seidman LJ, et al. The Consortium on the Genetics of Schizophrenia: neurocognitive endophenotypes. Schizophr Bull. 2007;33:49–68. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbl055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Reitz C, Mayeux R. Endophenotypes in normal brain morphology and Alzheimer’s disease: a review. Neuroscience. 2009;164:174–190. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gouw AA, Seewann A, van der Flier WM, Barkhof F, Rozemuller AM, Scheltens P, et al. Heterogeneity of small vessel disease: a systematic review of MRI and histopathology correlations. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011;82:126–135. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.204685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Debette S, Markus HS. The clinical importance of white matter hyperintensities on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;341:c3666. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c3666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Atwood LD, Wolf PA, Heard-Costa NL, Massaro JM, Beiser A, D’Agostino RB, et al. Genetic variation in white matter hyperintensity volume in the Framingham Study. Stroke. 2004;35:1609–1613. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000129643.77045.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Carmelli D, DeCarli C, Swan GE, Jack LM, Reed T, Wolf PA, et al. Evidence for genetic variance in white matter hyperintensity volume in normal elderly male twins. Stroke. 1998;29:1177–1181. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.6.1177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Turner ST, Jack CR, Fornage M, Mosley TH, Boerwinkle E, de Andrade M. Heritability of leukoaraiosis in hypertensive sibships. Hypertension. 2004;43:483–487. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000112303.26158.92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fornage M, Debette S, Bis JC, Schmidt H, Ikram MA, Dufouil C, et al. Genome-wide association studies of cerebral white matter lesion burden: the CHARGE consortium. Ann Neurol. 2011;69:928–939. doi: 10.1002/ana.22403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tabara Y, Igase M, Okada Y, Nagai T, Uetani E, Kido T, et al. Association of Chr17q25 with cerebral white matter hyperintensities and cognitive impairment: the J-SHIPP study. Eur J Neurol. 2013;20:860–862. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03879.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Verhaaren BF, de Boer R, Vernooij MW, Rivadeneira F, Uitterlinden AG, Hofman A, et al. Replication study of chr17q25 with cerebral white matter lesion volume. Stroke. 2011;42:3297–3299. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.623090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Adib-Samii P, Rost N, Traylor M, Devan W, Biffi A, Lanfranconi S, et al. 17q25 Locus is associated with white matter hyperintensity volume in ischemic stroke, but not with lacunar stroke status. Stroke. 2013;44:1609–1615. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.679936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Verhaaren BF, Debette S, Bis JC, Smith JA, Ikram MK, Adams HH, et al. Multiethnic genome-wide association study of cerebral white matter hyperintensities on MRI. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2015;8:398–409. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.114.000858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Woo D, Falcone GJ, Devan WJ, Brown WM, Biffi A, Howard TD, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies 1q22 as a susceptibility locus for intracerebral hemorrhage. Am J Hum Genet. 2014;94:511–521. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Malik R, Chauhan G, Traylor M, Sargurupremraj M, Okada Y, Mishra A, et al. Multiancestry genome-wide association study of 520,000 subjects identifies 32 loci associated with stroke and stroke subtypes. Nat Genet. 2018;50:524–537. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0058-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Traylor M, Zhang CR, Adib-Samii P, Devan WJ, Parsons OE, Lanfranconi S, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis of cerebral white matter hyperintensities in patients with stroke. Neurology. 2016;86:146–153. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gunda B, Mine M, Kovacs T, Hornyak C, Bereczki D, Varallyay G, et al. COL4A2 mutation causing adult onset recurrent intracerebral hemorrhage and leukoencephalopathy. J Neurol. 2014;261:500–503. doi: 10.1007/s00415-013-7224-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lanfranconi S, Markus HS. COL4A1 mutations as a monogenic cause of cerebral small vessel disease: a systematic review. Stroke. 2010;41:e513–518. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.581918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Adib-Samii P, Devan W, Traylor M, Lanfranconi S, Zhang CR, Cloonan L, et al. Genetic architecture of white matter hyperintensities differs in hypertensive and nonhypertensive ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2015;46:348–353. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Debette S, Saba Y, Vojinovic D, Jian X, Adams H, Chauhan G, et al. 19th Workshop of the International Stroke Genetics Consortium, April 28-29, 2016, Boston, Massachusetts, USA: 2016.001 MRI-defined cerebrovascular genomics-The CHARGE consortium. Neurol Genet. 2017;3:S2–S11. doi: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Boczonadi V, Horvath R. Mitochondria: impaired mitochondrial translation in human disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2014;48:77–84. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2013.12.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sarnowski C, Satizabal CL, DeCarli C, Pitsillides AN, Cupples LA, Vasan RS, et al. Whole genome sequence analyses of brain imaging measures in the Framingham Study. Neurology. 2018;90:e188–e196. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vermeer SE, Koudstaal PJ, Oudkerk M, Hofman A, Breteler MM. Prevalence and risk factors of silent brain infarcts in the population-based Rotterdam Scan Study. Stroke. 2002;33:21–25. doi: 10.1161/hs0102.101629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Debette S, Bis JC, Fornage M, Schmidt H, Ikram MA, Sigurdsson S, et al. Genome-wide association studies of MRI-defined brain infarcts: meta-analysis from the CHARGE Consortium. Stroke. 2010;41:210–217. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.569194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.van Veluw SJ, Shih AY, Smith EE, Chen C, Schneider JA, Wardlaw JM, et al. Detection, risk factors, and functional consequences of cerebral microinfarcts. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:730–740. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30196-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Smith EE, Schneider JA, Wardlaw JM, Greenberg SM. Cerebral microinfarcts: the invisible lesions. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11:272–282. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70307-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Doubal FN, MacLullich AM, Ferguson KJ, Dennis MS, Wardlaw JM. Enlarged perivascular spaces on MRI are a feature of cerebral small vessel disease. Stroke. 2010;41:450–454. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.564914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wardlaw JM, Smith EE, Biessels GJ, Cordonnier C, Fazekas F, Frayne R, et al. Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:822–838. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70124-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wardlaw JM. Blood-brain barrier and cerebral small vessel disease. J Neurol Sci. 2010;299:66–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2010.08.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bruna AL, Martins I, Husson B, Landrieu P. Developmental dilatation of Virchow-Robin spaces: a genetic disorder? Pediatr Neurol. 2009;41:275–280. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2009.04.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Vilor-Tejedor N, Alemany S, Forns J, Caceres A, Murcia M, Macia D, et al. Assessment of Susceptibility Risk Factors for ADHD in Imaging Genetic Studies. J Atten Disord. 2016 doi: 10.1177/1087054716664408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Smith EE, Saposnik G, Biessels GJ, Doubal FN, Fornage M, Gorelick PB, et al. Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Silent Cerebrovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2017;48:e44–e71. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yates PA, Villemagne VL, Ellis KA, Desmond PM, Masters CL, Rowe CC. Cerebral microbleeds: a review of clinical, genetic, and neuroimaging associations. Front Neurol. 2014;4:205. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2013.00205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Maxwell SS, Jackson CA, Paternoster L, Cordonnier C, Thijs V, Al-Shahi Salman R, et al. Genetic associations with brain microbleeds: Systematic review and meta-analyses. Neurology. 2011;77:158–167. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318224afa3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Biffi A, Sonni A, Anderson CD, Kissela B, Jagiella JM, Schmidt H, et al. Variants at APOE influence risk of deep and lobar intracerebral hemorrhage. Ann Neurol. 2010;68:934–943. doi: 10.1002/ana.22134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Vernooij MW, de Groot M, van der Lugt A, Ikram MA, Krestin GP, Hofman A, et al. White matter atrophy and lesion formation explain the loss of structural integrity of white matter in aging. Neuroimage. 2008;43:470–477. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.07.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Maillard P, Carmichael O, Harvey D, Fletcher E, Reed B, Mungas D, et al. FLAIR and diffusion MRI signals are independent predictors of white matter hyperintensities. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34:54–61. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.de Groot M, Verhaaren BF, de Boer R, Klein S, Hofman A, van der Lugt A, et al. Changes in normal-appearing white matter precede development of white matter lesions. Stroke. 2013;44:1037–1042. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.680223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Evans TE, O’Sullivan MJ, de Groot M, Niessen WJ, Hofman A, Krestin GP, et al. White Matter Microstructure Improves Stroke Risk Prediction in the General Population. Stroke. 2016;47:2756–2762. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kochunov P, Jahanshad N, Marcus D, Winkler A, Sprooten E, Nichols TE, et al. Heritability of fractional anisotropy in human white matter: a comparison of Human Connectome Project and ENIGMA-DTI data. Neuroimage. 2015;111:300–311. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sprooten E, Knowles EE, McKay DR, Goring HH, Curran JE, Kent JW, Jr, et al. Common genetic variants and gene expression associated with white matter microstructure in the human brain. Neuroimage. 2014;97:252–261. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Coll B, Feinstein SB. Carotid intima-media thickness measurements: techniques and clinical relevance. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2008;10:444–450. doi: 10.1007/s11883-008-0068-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.de Weerd M, Greving JP, Hedblad B, Lorenz MW, Mathiesen EB, O’Leary DH, et al. Prevalence of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in the general population: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Stroke. 2010;41:1294–1297. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.581058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Prati P, Vanuzzo D, Casaroli M, Di Chiara A, De Biasi F, Feruglio GA, et al. Prevalence and determinants of carotid atherosclerosis in a general population. Stroke. 1992;23:1705–1711. doi: 10.1161/01.str.23.12.1705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sturlaugsdottir R, Aspelund T, Bjornsdottir G, Sigurdsson S, Thorsson B, Eiriksdottir G, et al. Prevalence and determinants of carotid plaque in the cross-sectional REFINE-Reykjavik study. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e012457. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bots ML, Hoes AW, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Common carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction: the Rotterdam Study. Circulation. 1997;96:1432–1437. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.5.1432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gupta A, Baradaran H, Schweitzer AD, Kamel H, Pandya A, Delgado D, et al. Carotid plaque MRI and stroke risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2013;44:3071–3077. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bis JC, Kavousi M, Franceschini N, Isaacs A, Abecasis GR, Schminke U, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies from the CHARGE consortium identifies common variants associated with carotid intima media thickness and plaque. Nat Genet. 2011;43:940–947. doi: 10.1038/ng.920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Petty GW, Brown RD, Jr, Whisnant JP, Sicks JD, O’Fallon WM, Wiebers DO. Ischemic stroke subtypes: a population-based study of incidence and risk factors. Stroke. 1999;30:2513–2516. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.12.2513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Schulz UG, Rothwell PM. Differences in vascular risk factors between etiological subtypes of ischemic stroke: importance of population-based studies. Stroke. 2003;34:2050–2059. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000079818.08343.8C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Arboix A, Alio J. Cardioembolic stroke: clinical features, specific cardiac disorders and prognosis. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2010;6:150–161. doi: 10.2174/157340310791658730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bapat A, Anderson CD, Ellinor PT, Lubitz SA. Genomic basis of atrial fibrillation. Heart. 2018;104:201–206. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-311027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gudbjartsson DF, Holm H, Gretarsdottir S, Thorleifsson G, Walters GB, Thorgeirsson G, et al. A sequence variant in ZFHX3 on 16q22 associates with atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke. Nat Genet. 2009;41:876–878. doi: 10.1038/ng.417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lubitz SA, Parsons OE, Anderson CD, Benjamin EJ, Malik R, Weng LC, et al. Atrial Fibrillation Genetic Risk and Ischemic Stroke Mechanisms. Stroke. 2017;48:1451–1456. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kong B, Liu Y, Huang H, Jiang H, Huang C. Left atrial appendage closure for thromboembolism prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: advances and perspectives. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7:199–203. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.01.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yaghi S, Moon YP, Mora-McLaughlin C, Willey JZ, Cheung K, Di Tullio MR, et al. Left atrial enlargement and stroke recurrence: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Stroke. 2015;46:1488–1493. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yaghi S, Song C, Gray WA, Furie KL, Elkind MS, Kamel H. Left Atrial Appendage Function and Stroke Risk. Stroke. 2015;46:3554–3559. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kamel H, Okin PM, Longstreth WT, Jr, Elkind MS, Soliman EZ. Atrial cardiopathy: a broadened concept of left atrial thromboembolism beyond atrial fibrillation. Future Cardiol. 2015;11:323–331. doi: 10.2217/fca.15.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Benjamin EJ, D’Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, Wolf PA, Levy D. Left atrial size and the risk of stroke and death. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1995;92:835–841. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.4.835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Di Tullio MR, Sacco RL, Sciacca RR, Homma S. Left atrial size and the risk of ischemic stroke in an ethnically mixed population. Stroke. 1999;30:2019–2024. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.10.2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wang L, Di Tullio MR, Beecham A, Slifer S, Rundek T, Homma S, et al. A comprehensive genetic study on left atrium size in Caribbean Hispanics identifies potential candidate genes in 17p10. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2010;3:386–392. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.110.938381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wild PS, Felix JF, Schillert A, Teumer A, Chen MH, Leening MJG, et al. Large-scale genome-wide analysis identifies genetic variants associated with cardiac structure and function. J Clin Invest. 2017;127:1798–1812. doi: 10.1172/JCI84840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hancock EW, Deal BJ, Mirvis DM, Okin P, Kligfield P, Gettes LS, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part V: electrocardiogram changes associated with cardiac chamber hypertrophy: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society: endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. Circulation. 2009;119:e251–261. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.191097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.He J, Tse G, Korantzopoulos P, Letsas KP, Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh S, Kamel H, et al. P-Wave Indices and Risk of Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Stroke. 2017;48:2066–2072. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kamel H, Hunter M, Moon YP, Yaghi S, Cheung K, Di Tullio MR, et al. Electrocardiographic Left Atrial Abnormality and Risk of Stroke: Northern Manhattan Study. Stroke. 2015;46:3208–3212. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Kamel H, O’Neal WT, Okin PM, Loehr LR, Alonso A, Soliman EZ. Electrocardiographic left atrial abnormality and stroke subtype in the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Ann Neurol. 2015;78:670–678. doi: 10.1002/ana.24482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Pfeufer A, van Noord C, Marciante KD, Arking DE, Larson MG, Smith AV, et al. Genome-wide association study of PR interval. Nat Genet. 2010;42:153–159. doi: 10.1038/ng.517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wardlaw JM, Lewis SC, Keir SL, Dennis MS, Shenkin S. Cerebral microbleeds are associated with lacunar stroke defined clinically and radiologically, independently of white matter lesions. Stroke. 2006;37:2633–2636. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000240513.00579.bf. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Duering M, Csanadi E, Gesierich B, Jouvent E, Herve D, Seiler S, et al. Incident lacunes preferentially localize to the edge of white matter hyperintensities: insights into the pathophysiology of cerebral small vessel disease. Brain. 2013;136:2717–2726. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Neurology Working Group of the Cohorts for H, Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology Consortium tSGN, the International Stroke Genetics C. Identification of additional risk loci for stroke and small vessel disease: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:695–707. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00102-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Zhu X, Feng T, Tayo BO, Liang J, Young JH, Franceschini N, et al. Meta-analysis of correlated traits via summary statistics from GWASs with an application in hypertension. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;96:21–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Klarenbeek P, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Rouhl RP, Knottnerus IL, Staals J. Ambulatory blood pressure in patients with lacunar stroke: association with total MRI burden of cerebral small vessel disease. Stroke. 2013;44:2995–2999. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Lau KK, Li L, Schulz U, Simoni M, Chan KH, Ho SL, et al. Total small vessel disease score and risk of recurrent stroke: Validation in 2 large cohorts. Neurology. 2017;88:2260–2267. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Song TJ, Kim J, Song D, Yoo J, Lee HS, Kim YJ, et al. Total Cerebral Small-Vessel Disease Score is Associated with Mortality during Follow-Up after Acute Ischemic Stroke. J Clin Neurol. 2017;13:187–195. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2017.13.2.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Staals J, Booth T, Morris Z, Bastin ME, Gow AJ, Corley J, et al. Total MRI load of cerebral small vessel disease and cognitive ability in older people. Neurobiol Aging. 2015;36:2806–2811. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.06.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Uiterwijk R, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Huijts M, De Leeuw PW, Kroon AA, Staals J. Total Cerebral Small Vessel Disease MRI Score Is Associated with Cognitive Decline in Executive Function in Patients with Hypertension. Front Aging Neurosci. 2016;8:301. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Del Brutto VJ, Ortiz JG, Del Brutto OH, Mera RM, Zambrano M, Biller J. Total cerebral small vessel disease score and cognitive performance in community-dwelling older adults. Results from the Atahualpa Project. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018;33:325–331. doi: 10.1002/gps.4747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Staals J, Makin SD, Doubal FN, Dennis MS, Wardlaw JM. Stroke subtype, vascular risk factors, and total MRI brain small-vessel disease burden. Neurology. 2014;83:1228–1234. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Yakushiji Y, Charidimou A, Noguchi T, Nishihara M, Eriguchi M, Nanri Y, et al. Total Small Vessel Disease Score in Neurologically Healthy Japanese Adults in the Kashima Scan Study. Intern Med. 2018;57:189–196. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.8393-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES