Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 19.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Chem Neurosci. 2017 Nov 27;9(9):2205–2209. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00404

Altered CREB binding to activity-dependent genes in serine racemase deficient mice, a mouse model of schizophrenia

Darrick T Balu 1,2,*, Joseph T Coyle 1,3
PMCID: PMC5971149  NIHMSID: NIHMS940694  PMID: 29172439

Abstract

cAMP-response-element-binding protein (CREB) is a transcription factor ubiquitously expressed in the brain that regulates neuroplasticity by modulating gene expression. The influx of calcium through N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) is a well-defined mechanism that leads to the increased expression of CREB-dependent genes, including brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), microRNA-132, and activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein (Arc). These molecules are implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. We previously demonstrated that serine racemase knockout (SR−/−) mice, which exhibit NMDAR hypofunction due to a lack of the forebrain NMDAR co-agonist D-serine, also have reduced expression of CREB-dependent genes in the hippocampus. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation, we show here that in SR−/− mice, there is less CREB bound to the promoter regions of BDNF, microRNA-132, and Arc. These data suggest that NMDAR hypofunction in SR−/− mice leads to reduced CREB binding on known activity-dependent genes, in turn contributing to their reduced expression.

Keywords: Serine racemase, D-serine, NMDA receptor, CREB, Arc, Brain derived neurotrophic factor


N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) are ionotropic glutamate receptors that are essential mediators of synaptic plasticity, learning and memory 1. What makes the activation of these receptors unique, is that in addition to the binding of its agonist glutamate, they also require the concomitant binding of a co-agonist, glycine or D-serine, to the GluN1 subunit of the NMDAR 2-3. D-serine is converted from L-serine by the neuronal enzyme serine racemase (SR) 4. Both the enzyme and D-serine are enriched in cortico-limbic regions of the brain and are localized to the same areas as NMDARs 5. Importantly, the D-serine binding site on GluN1 is not saturated in vivo 6 even though the endogenous co-agonists glycine and D-serine are present in the extracellular space 3. D-serine is important for normal NMDAR functioning, NMDAR-dependent long-term potentiation (LTP), and it is believed to be the primary co-agonist for synaptic, but not extra-synaptic NMDARs 7-11. From studies with mice with a constitutive deletion in SR (SR−/−) mice, D-serine was shown to also be important for maintaining glutamatergic dendritic integrity in the adult cortex and hippocampus 8, 12-13.

Over the past two decades, there has been a convergence of pharmacologic, genetic, and biochemical evidence pointing to alterations in excitatory signaling, particularly involving hypofunction of NMDAR, as a key contributor to the schizophrenia disease process14. Genetic animal models have also provided a wealth of data suggesting that reduced NMDAR activity can lead to changes in the brain and behavior that are similar to what is observed in schizophrenia 15-17. We have demonstrated that mice lacking SR (SR−/−) have reduced D-serine and display NMDAR hypofunction 9. Similar to what is observed in schizophrenia, SR−/− mice have excitatory neurons with reduced dendritic spines, enlarged lateral ventricles, reduced cortico-hippocampal volume, oxidative stress, and an increased concentration of GABA in the prefrontal cortex, which are associated with learning and cognitive deficits 8-9, 18-21.

SR−/− mice also have reduced expression of genes that are dependent on NMDAR activity, such as brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein (Arc), and microRNA-132 (miR-132) 8, 18. cAMP-response-element-binding protein (CREB) is a transcription factor ubiquitously expressed in the brain that regulates neuroplasticity by modulating gene expression. The influx of calcium through NMDARs is a well-defined mechanism that leads to the increased expression of CREB-dependent genes22, including BDNF, Arc, and miR-132. Therefore, we were interested in determining whether the amount of CREB bound to the promoter regions of BDNF, Arc, and miR-132 was altered in SR−/− mice.

In order to assess CREB occupancy at various genes from the brains of WT and SR−/− mice, we utilized a chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay that can probe protein-DNA interactions within the natural chromatin context of the cell. Before we assessed CREB occupancy between our WT and mutant mice, we first confirmed that the ChIP assay was functioning optimally. Using hippocampal tissue from WT mice, we demonstrated that our digestion produced chromatin fragments of adequate sizes, being digested to 1 to 5 nucleosomes in length (150 to 900 bp; Fig. 1A). We then incubated this DNA with either positive (Histone H3) or negative (rabbit IgG) control antibodies and performed qPCR on the immunoprecipitated and purified DNA using primers (provided by the manufacturer) against the mouse RLP30 gene locus. As shown in Fig. 1B, there was an enrichment of immunoprecipitated DNA compared to input DNA in our positive control antibody, but not negative control antibody sample (Fig. 1B), thereby confirming the specificity of our assay. Thus, we next aimed to determine whether the amount of CREB bound to DNA at various NMDAR activity-dependent genes was altered in SR−/− mice. We have previously demonstrated that the total levels of CREB protein are unaltered in the hippocampus of SRKO mice8.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Reduced CREB occupancy to the cis regulatory regions of the miR-132, BDNF, Arc genes in the hippocampus of SR−/− mice. (A) Representative agarose gel demonstrating proper chromatin digestion from wild-type hippocampal tissue. (B) Positive control (histone H3 antibody) showing RLP30 intron 2 enrichment compared to a negative control rabbit IgG antibody. (C) Validation of the CRE site in the miR-132 gene showing more enrichment using primers directed to the CRE sequence in the promoter region compared to ones directed 800bp upstream from it (white bars; CREB antibody). No enrichment was detected when the negative control antibody was used for IP (black bars; IgG). (D) Relative amount of CREB bound to the miR-132 promoter in the hippocampus of WT (n = 6; black bar) and SR−/− (n=5; white bar) mice. (E) Relative amount of CREB bound to the synaptic activity response element (SARE) of the Arc gene in the hippocampus of WT (n = 6; black bar) and SR−/− (n=5; white bar) mice. (F) Relative amount of CREB bound to the promoter regions of BDNF exons I (pI) and IV (pIV) in the hippocampus of WT (n = 6; black bar) and SR−/− (n=5; white bar) mice. (B-F) Values are expressed as signal relative to the total amount of input chromatin. Asterisk (*) indicates significant differences from WT (p < 0.05). All values represent the mean ± SEM.

Aberrant microRNA processing might contribute to the pathophysiology of schizophrenia 23, as the expression of the neuron-enriched miR-132 is reduced in the disorder 24. microRNAs are non-coding RNAs that modulate neural plasticity by regulating the translation of target mRNA transcripts. miR-132 regulates basal and activity-induced neurite outgrowth 25. The expression of this microRNA is enhanced in vivo in response to external stimuli and after NMDAR activation 23, 26-27. We first examined the miR132 gene in WT and SR−/− mice. As expected, we did not detect any signal from chromatin incubated with control IgG antibody (Fig. 1C). To validate that our primers were directed against the miR-132 CRE region, we used DNA obtained from CREB antibody ChIP in PCR reactions containing primers directed against a sequence within the miR-132 CRE25 or 800 base pairs upstream of the CRE. We found significantly more immunoprecipitated DNA relative to input with the miR132 CRE primers compared to the upstream CRE primers (Fig. 1C), demonstrating that our primers are targeting the DNA sequence where CREB is binding to miR132 promoter. Using these validated CRE primers, we found that SR−/− mice have approximately 50% less CREB bound at the miR-132 promoter region than WT mice in chromatin isolated from the hippocampus (Fig. 1D; t(9) = 3.46, p < 0.01).

Recent genetic studies have demonstrated a convergence of genetic variants on a set of synaptic proteins that interact with the protein Arc in subjects with schizophrenia28-29. Arc (Arg3.1) is an immediate early gene that is robustly induced by learning and its expression is almost exclusively in excitatory neurons of the hippocampus and neocortex 30. The upregulation of Arc mRNA is induced, in part, by calcium influx through NMDARs, where it is trafficked to dendrites and synthesized at synaptic sites 31, as well as to the nucleus where it suppresses GluA1 transcription 32. Arc is also involved in regulating dendritic spines via actin remodeling 33. A major synaptic activity response element (SARE) was identified as a ~100-bp element located at >5 kb upstream of the Arc transcription initiation site in the mouse genome, where CREB binding leads to enhanced transcription34. We found that SR−/− mice had 80% less CREB binding to the SARE region of the Arc gene (Fig. 1E; t(8) = 3.57, p < 0.01).

Evidence suggests that impaired neurotrophic signaling could underlie the morphological abnormalities in schizophrenia. BDNF regulates numerous aspects of synaptic plasticity and neuronal dendritic fidelity by signaling through tropomyosin receptor kinase B (TrkB), its high-affinity receptor 35. BDNF mRNA and protein 36-38 levels are reduced in the brains of subjects with schizophrenia. The transcription of BDNF is quite complex, as the rodent gene is composed of at least eight untranslated 5′ exons and one 3′ exon encoding the protein. The different transcripts are expressed by splicing each of the non-coding exons to the coding exon39. This complex structure allows BDNF transcripts to be differentially modulated at subcellular locations and in response to distinct stimuli40. Using previously validated exon-specific BDNF primers41, we found that SR−/− mice had significantly less CREB binding at the BDNF I promoter region (Fig. 1F; t(9) = 2.88, p <0.05), but not at the BDNF IV promoter region (Fig. 1F; t(9) = 1.50, p > 0.05). As the expression of both of these splice variants BDNF (exon I and IV) are induced by neuronal activity39-40, it is possible there could be a difference in CREB binding to BDNF pIV in SR−/− mice following stimulation.

Finally, we were interested in determining whether SR−/− mice had a more global deficit in the binding of CREB to the promoter regions of genes whose transcription is enhanced by NMDAR activity. Therefore, we looked at CREB binding to cFos and activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) 42. Interestingly, the levels of CREB occupancy on these genes did not significantly differ between WT and SR−/− mice under baseline conditions (Fig. 2A-B; cFos: t(8) = 1.84, p > 0.05 ; ATF3: (8) = 0.93, p > 0.05).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

CREB binding at the promoter regions of other activity-dependent genes is unaltered in SR−/− mice. (A) CREB promoter occupancy on the cFOS and (B) ATF3 genes was quantified in the hippocampus of WT (n = 6; black bars) and SR−/− (n=5; white bars) mice. Values are expressed as signal relative to the total amount of input chromatin. All values represent the mean ± SEM.

In sum, these data demonstrate that NMDAR hypofunction caused by the selective removal of the NMDAR co-agonist, D-serine, leads to altered CREB binding on known activity-dependent genes. Our ChIP results suggest that reduced CREB binding contributes to the lower levels of BDNF, miR-132, and Arc that we previously observed in SR−/− mice. There are several factors to take into consideration when interpreting these results. First, it is possible that the reduced levels of these targets in SR−/− mice are due to other epigenetic changes in addition to reduced CREB binding, such as histone modifications, methylation, and differential binding of other transcriptional activators or repressors. Second, our ChIP was performed using an antibody against total CREB. The phosphorylation of CREB and other coactivators (i.e. CREB binding protein) affects transcriptional activity22. For example, phosphorylation of CREB at serine 133 is a well-established site that enhances its activity. Third, as we performed ChIP using whole hippocampal homogenate, it is possible that CREB binding could be vary between subfields of the hippocampus, as well as between different brain regions. As our data were collected from naïve animals, it will be of interest to determine whether SR−/− mice show a blunted recruitment of CREB to the promoters of these genes following a stimulus that increases NMDAR activity, such as learning. Finally, future studies will determine whether pharmacological enhancement of NMDAR (i.e D-serine administration) function in SR−/− mice, which reverses these abnormalities at the RNA and protein levels, also normalizes the epigenetic perturbations.

METHODS

Animals

Adult male mice (3-5 months old) on a C57BL/6 background were used for all the experiments. Animals were group housed in polycarbonate cages and maintained on a 12:12 h light/dark cycle in a temperature (22°C) and humidity controlled vivarium. Animals were given access to food and water ad libitum. All animal procedures were approved by the McLean Hospital Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation

Wild-type (WT; n = 5-6) and SR−/− (n = 5) mice were killed and their hippocampi were flash frozen on dry ice. ChIP was performed on hippocampal tissue using the SimpleChIP Plus Enzymatic Chromatin IP kit with magnetic beads (Cell Signaling Technology; Danvers, MA; #9005). Briefly, proteins were crosslinked to DNA using 1.5% formaldehyde (37% stock by weight with methyl alcohol; Fisher Scientific) with rocking for 20min at room temperature. Adding glycine stopped the crosslinking. The tissue was disaggregated into a single-cell suspension using a dounce homogenizer. The cells were lysed and 0.13 μl of micrococcal nuclease (37°C with frequent mixing for 16min) was used to digest the chromatin. Nuclear membranes were broken by incubating all the samples simultaneously in a bath sonciator (amplitude = 80) for 6x 20s (30s in between sonications on ice). Chromatin was incubated with rabbit anti-CREB (CST #9197) antibody at 1:50 dilution overnight at 4°C on a rotisserie. A 2% input aliquot was removed from each sample. The remaining chromatin was incubated with Protein G magnetic beads, followed by low and high-salt washes. Chromatin was eluted from the beads using Elution Buffer (heat at 65°C for 5min then on rotisserie for 25min). The cross-links were reversed using Proteinase K and incubating for 2h at 65°C. The DNA was then purified using the kit-supplied columns.

qPCR

To determine the levels of CREB bound at each gene of interest, PCR primers were directed near the CRE or SARE sequence of each promoter. A list of the primer sequences is included in the Supplemental Table S1. A serial dilution of chromatin DNA was used to generate a standard curve (power regression fitting) and determine the efficiency of amplification. A 2μl aliquot of each input and IP sample was used for qPCR (Platinum Sybr Green qPCR SuperMix-UDG; Invitrogen), with a total reaction volume of 20μl. Each standard and sample was run in triplicate and melting temperature analysis was performed after every PCR to ensure accuracy. The Ct values for each IP and input sample were normalized using the standard curve. The averaged normalized values were used to calculate the fold-enrichment for each animal (average normalized IP / average normalized Input × 2). The fold-enrichment values were then averaged for each genotype and used for statistical analyses. Unpaired student’s t test was used to compare values between experimental groups. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Supplementary Material

Table S1

Acknowledgments

Funding Sources

This research was supported by a 1K99MH099252-01A1 (DTB), 5R00MH099252-04 (DTB), and R01MH05190 (JTC).

Abbrevations

Arc

activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein

BDNF

brain derived neurotrophic factor

ChIP

chromatin immunoprecipitation

CRE

cAMP-response-element

CREB

cAMP-response-element-binding protein

miR-132

microRNA-132

NMDAR

N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors

SR

serine racemase

WT

wild-type

Footnotes

Author contributions

D.T.B. performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. D.T.B. and J.T.C. wrote the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

JTC has served as a consultant to Forum Pharmaceuticals in the last 2 years. A patent owned by Massachusetts General Hospital for the use of D-serine as a treatment for serious mental illness could yield royalties for Dr. Coyle. DTB declares no competing financial interests.

References

  • 1.Paoletti P, Bellone C, Zhou Q. NMDA receptor subunit diversity: impact on receptor properties, synaptic plasticity and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14(6):383–400. doi: 10.1038/nrn3504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kleckner NW, Dingledine R. Requirement for glycine in activation of NMDA-receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Science. 1988;241(4867):835–7. doi: 10.1126/science.2841759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Johnson JW, Ascher P. Glycine potentiates the NMDA response in cultured mouse brain neurons. Nature. 1987;325(6104):529–31. doi: 10.1038/325529a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wolosker H, Blackshaw S, Snyder SH. Serine racemase: a glial enzyme synthesizing D-serine to regulate glutamate-N-methyl-D-aspartate neurotransmission. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1999;96(23):13409–14. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.23.13409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schell MJ, Molliver ME, Snyder SH. D-serine, an endogenous synaptic modulator: localization to astrocytes and glutamate-stimulated release. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(9):3948–52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.9.3948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bergeron R, Meyer TM, Coyle JT, Greene RW. Modulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor function by glycine transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(26):15730–4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Papouin T, Ladepeche L, Ruel J, Sacchi S, Labasque M, Hanini M, Groc L, Pollegioni L, Mothet JP, Oliet SH. Synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDA receptors are gated by different endogenous coagonists. Cell. 2012;150(3):633–46. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Balu DT, Li Y, Puhl MD, Benneyworth MA, Basu AC, Takagi S, Bolshakov VY, Coyle JT. Multiple risk pathways for schizophrenia converge in serine racemase knockout mice, a mouse model of NMDA receptor hypofunction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(26):E2400–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1304308110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Basu AC, Tsai GE, Ma CL, Ehmsen JT, Mustafa AK, Han L, Jiang ZI, Benneyworth MA, Froimowitz MP, Lange N, Snyder SH, Bergeron R, Coyle JT. Targeted disruption of serine racemase affects glutamatergic neurotransmission and behavior. Mol Psychiatry. 2009;14(7):719–27. doi: 10.1038/mp.2008.130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Le Bail M, Martineau M, Sacchi S, Yatsenko N, Radzishevsky I, Conrod S, Ait Ouares K, Wolosker H, Pollegioni L, Billard JM, Mothet JP. Identity of the NMDA receptor coagonist is synapse specific and developmentally regulated in the hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(2):E204–13. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1416668112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li Y, Sacchi S, Pollegioni L, Basu AC, Coyle JT, Bolshakov VY. Identity of endogenous NMDAR glycine site agonist in amygdala is determined by synaptic activity level. Nature communications. 2013;4:1760. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Balu DT, Basu AC, Corradi JP, Cacace AM, Coyle JT. The NMDA receptor co-agonists, d-serine and glycine, regulate neuronal dendritic architecture in the somatosensory cortex. Neurobiology of disease. 2012;45(2):671–82. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2011.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Balu DT, Coyle JT. Chronic D-serine reverses arc expression and partially rescues dendritic abnormalities in a mouse model of NMDA receptor hypofunction. Neurochem Int. 2014;75C:76–78. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2014.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Balu DT. The NMDA Receptor and Schizophrenia: From Pathophysiology to Treatment. Adv Pharmacol. 2016;76:351–82. doi: 10.1016/bs.apha.2016.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Belforte JE, Zsiros V, Sklar ER, Jiang Z, Yu G, Li Y, Quinlan EM, Nakazawa K. Postnatal NMDA receptor ablation in corticolimbic interneurons confers schizophrenia-like phenotypes. Nat Neurosci. 2009 doi: 10.1038/nn.2447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tatard-Leitman VM, Jutzeler CR, Suh J, Saunders JA, Billingslea EN, Morita S, White R, Featherstone RE, Ray R, Ortinski PI, Banerjee A, Gandal MJ, Lin R, Alexandrescu A, Liang Y, Gur RE, Borgmann-Winter KE, Carlson GC, Hahn CG, Siegel SJ. Pyramidal cell selective ablation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor 1 causes increase in cellular and network excitability. Biol Psychiatry. 2015;77(6):556–68. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.06.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jadi MP, Margarita Behrens M, Sejnowski TJ. Abnormal Gamma Oscillations in N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Hypofunction Models of Schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.DeVito LM, Balu DT, Kanter BR, Lykken C, Basu AC, Coyle JT, Eichenbaum H. Serine racemase deletion disrupts memory for order and alters cortical dendritic morphology. Genes Brain Behav. 2011;10(2):210–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2010.00656.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Balu DT, Carlson GC, Talbot K, Kazi H, Hill-Smith TE, Easton RM, Birnbaum MJ, Lucki I. Akt1 deficiency in schizophrenia and impairment of hippocampal plasticity and function. Hippocampus. 2012;22(2):230–40. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Balu DT, Coyle JT. Neuronal d-serine regulates dendritic architecture in the somatosensory cortex. Neuroscience letters. 2012;517(2):77–81. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.04.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Puhl MD, Mintzopoulos D, Jensen JE, Gillis TE, Konopaske GT, Kaufman MJ, Coyle JT. In vivo magnetic resonance studies reveal neuroanatomical and neurochemical abnormalities in the serine racemase knockout mouse model of schizophrenia. Neurobiology of disease. 2015;73:269–74. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Greer PL, Greenberg ME. From synapse to nucleus: calcium-dependent gene transcription in the control of synapse development and function. Neuron. 2008;59(6):846–60. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Miller BH, Wahlestedt C. MicroRNA dysregulation in psychiatric disease. Brain Res. 2010;1338:89–99. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.03.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Miller BH, Zeier Z, Xi L, Lanz TA, Deng S, Strathmann J, Willoughby D, Kenny PJ, Elsworth JD, Lawrence MS, Roth RH, Edbauer D, Kleiman RJ, Wahlestedt C. MicroRNA-132 dysregulation in schizophrenia has implications for both neurodevelopment and adult brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109(8):3125–30. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113793109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wayman GA, Davare M, Ando H, Fortin D, Varlamova O, Cheng HY, Marks D, Obrietan K, Soderling TR, Goodman RH, Impey S. An activity-regulated microRNA controls dendritic plasticity by down-regulating p250GAP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(26):9093–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803072105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nudelman AS, Dirocco DP, Lambert TJ, Garelick MG, Le J, Nathanson NM, Storm DR. Neuronal activity rapidly induces transcription of the CREB-regulated microRNA-132 in vivo. Hippocampus. 2009 doi: 10.1002/hipo.20646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tognini P, Putignano E, Coatti A, Pizzorusso T. Experience-dependent expression of miR-132 regulates ocular dominance plasticity. Nature neuroscience. 2011;14(10):1237–9. doi: 10.1038/nn.2920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fromer M, Pocklington AJ, Kavanagh DH, Williams HJ, Dwyer S, Gormley P, Georgieva L, Rees E, Palta P, Ruderfer DM, Carrera N, Humphreys I, Johnson JS, Roussos P, Barker DD, Banks E, Milanova V, Grant SG, Hannon E, Rose SA, Chambert K, Mahajan M, Scolnick EM, Moran JL, Kirov G, Palotie A, McCarroll SA, Holmans P, Sklar P, Owen MJ, Purcell SM, O’Donovan MC. De novo mutations in schizophrenia implicate synaptic networks. Nature. 2014 doi: 10.1038/nature12929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Purcell SM, Moran JL, Fromer M, Ruderfer D, Solovieff N, Roussos P, O’Dushlaine C, Chambert K, Bergen SE, Kahler A, Duncan L, Stahl E, Genovese G, Fernandez E, Collins MO, Komiyama NH, Choudhary JS, Magnusson PK, Banks E, Shakir K, Garimella K, Fennell T, DePristo M, Grant SG, Haggarty SJ, Gabriel S, Scolnick EM, Lander ES, Hultman CM, Sullivan PF, McCarroll SA, Sklar P. A polygenic burden of rare disruptive mutations in schizophrenia. Nature. 2014;506(7487):185–90. doi: 10.1038/nature12975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Vazdarjanova A, Ramirez-Amaya V, Insel N, Plummer TK, Rosi S, Chowdhury S, Mikhael D, Worley PF, Guzowski JF, Barnes CA. Spatial exploration induces ARC, a plasticity-related immediate-early gene, only in calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II-positive principal excitatory and inhibitory neurons of the rat forebrain. J Comp Neurol. 2006;498(3):317–29. doi: 10.1002/cne.21003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Korb E, Finkbeiner S. Arc in synaptic plasticity: from gene to behavior. Trends Neurosci. 2011;34(11):591–8. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2011.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Korb E, Wilkinson CL, Delgado RN, Lovero KL, Finkbeiner S. Arc in the nucleus regulates PML-dependent GluA1 transcription and homeostatic plasticity. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16(7):874–83. doi: 10.1038/nn.3429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Peebles CL, Yoo J, Thwin MT, Palop JJ, Noebels JL, Finkbeiner S. Arc regulates spine morphology and maintains network stability in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(42):18173–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006546107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kawashima T, Okuno H, Nonaka M, Adachi-Morishima A, Kyo N, Okamura M, Takemoto-Kimura S, Worley PF, Bito H. Synaptic activity-responsive element in the Arc/Arg3 1 promoter essential for synapse-to-nucleus signaling in activated neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(1):316–21. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806518106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Binder DK, Scharfman HE. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Growth Factors. 2004;22(3):123–31. doi: 10.1080/08977190410001723308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hashimoto T, Bergen SE, Nguyen QL, Xu B, Monteggia LM, Pierri JN, Sun Z, Sampson AR, Lewis DA. Relationship of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and its receptor TrkB to altered inhibitory prefrontal circuitry in schizophrenia. J Neurosci. 2005;25(2):372–83. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4035-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Weickert CS, Hyde TM, Lipska BK, Herman MM, Weinberger DR, Kleinman JE. Reduced brain-derived neurotrophic factor in prefrontal cortex of patients with schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry. 2003;8(6):592–610. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wong J, Hyde TM, Cassano HL, Deep-Soboslay A, Kleinman JE, Weickert CS. Promoter specific alterations of brain-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA in schizophrenia. Neuroscience. 2010;169(3):1071–1084. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.05.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Aid T, Kazantseva A, Piirsoo M, Palm K, Timmusk T. Mouse and rat BDNF gene structure and expression revisited. J Neurosci Res. 2007;85(3):525–35. doi: 10.1002/jnr.21139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Song M, Martinowich K, Lee FS. BDNF at the synapse: why location matters. Mol Psychiatry. 2017;22(10):1370–1375. doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gao J, Wang WY, Mao YW, Graff J, Guan JS, Pan L, Mak G, Kim D, Su SC, Tsai LH. A novel pathway regulates memory and plasticity via SIRT1 and miR-134. Nature. 2010;466(7310):1105–9. doi: 10.1038/nature09271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhang SJ, Buchthal B, Lau D, Hayer S, Dick O, Schwaninger M, Veltkamp R, Zou M, Weiss U, Bading H. A signaling cascade of nuclear calcium-CREB-ATF3 activated by synaptic NMDA receptors defines a gene repression module that protects against extrasynaptic NMDA receptor-induced neuronal cell death and ischemic brain damage. J Neurosci. 2011;31(13):4978–90. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2672-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1

RESOURCES