Short abstract
Objective
To determine whether genetic polymorphisms in the uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase 1A (UGT1A) and the C-C motif chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) genes are associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in Yi, Yao and Han ethnic groups in the Guizhou Province of China.
Methods
The study enrolled subjects with and without HBV infection. Whole blood was used for DNA genotyping using standard techniques. The study determined the frequencies of several polymorphic alleles (UGT1A6 [rs2070959], UGT1A1 [rs8175347], CCR5-59029 [rs1799987] and CCR5Δ32 [rs333]) and then characterized their relationship with HBV infection.
Results
A total of 404 subjects were enrolled in the study: 138 from the Yao group, 101 from the Yi group and 165 from the Han group. There was a significant difference in the frequency of UGT1A1 rs8175347 polymorphisms among the three groups. The rates of 7TA carriers of UGT1A1 rs8175347 in all three groups were significantly higher than the other genotypes. Individuals with genotype AA of UGT1A6 rs2070959 in the Yi group had a higher risk for HBV infection than in the Yao and Han groups. The frequency of genotype GG in CCR5-59029 in the Yao group was significantly higher than in the Yi group. The genotypes of CCR5Δ32 were not associated with HBV infection.
Conclusion
These findings provide genetic and epidemiological evidence for an association of UGT1A and CCR5-59029 polymorphisms with HBV infection in Chinese Yi and Yao populations.
Keywords: C-C motif chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5), ethnic minorities, gene polymorphisms, hepatitis B virus infection, uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase 1A (UGT-1A)
Introduction
Approximately one-third of all human beings are infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV), the most serious hepatitis virus that is potentially life-threatening;1 with 6% being chronic carriers and more than 600 000 dying each year from acute or chronic sequelae such as liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.2,3 There is considerable geographic variation in the distribution of HBV and the areas with a high rate of infection are present, especially in Asia and Africa, where the most common routes of infection are still vertical transmission from mother to child and horizontal transmission between children.4–6
It has become clear that replication of HBV is the primary promoter of immune-mediated liver injury and disease progression.7 This virus does not damage the liver directly, but rather an antibody-mediated immune reaction and non-specific inflammation leading to cytokine-mediated hepatocyte injury are triggered by the viral antigens.8 Most Asian carriers of HBV are infected either during the perinatal period or in early childhood.9 While most infected adults recover and develop protective antibodies, approximately 10–15% remain chronically infected and are thus at risk for developing severe hepatic pathology.10
Although not yet fully understood, the mechanisms of persistent HBV infection appear to involve both immunological and genetic components.11,12 Host (e.g. age at the time of infection, sex, ethnicity, immune status), viral and external factors are all of importance in this connection.13,14 Notably, genetic variation exerts an impact on susceptibility to persistent HBV infection and the associated development of hepatocellular carcinoma.5,6,15,16
The superfamily of uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) consists of cytosolic glucuronosyltransferases that catalyse the transfer of the glucuronic acid component of uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glucuronic acid to a small hydrophobic molecule.17 A variety of genetic polymorphisms in these UGTs have been described.18 UGT-1A6 protein is produced in a number of tissues, including the liver, bile ducts, colon, stomach and brain, and catalyses the glucuronidation of small, planar phenols and primary amines, including acetaminophen, β-blockers and salicylates.19,20 Heterozygous expression of the UGT1A6*2 gene enhances enzyme activity in both human liver tissue and cultured lever cells.21 Among Caucasians, approximately 10% are heterozygous and 10% homozygous with respect to the UGT-1A6*2 forms of this protein.18,22 Moreover, among Taiwanese subjects, there is a relationship between the detoxifying activity of UGT-1A7 and hepatocellular carcinoma.23 However, other host factors that may influence the outcome of persistent HBV infection remain elusive.
Individuals that develop a broad immunological response to HBV involving T cells are more likely to recover.24 Chemokines attract and recruit specific populations of immune cells to the sites of injury or infection.25 The C-C motif chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5), which is produced by granulocytes, macrophages, immature dendritic cells, CD8+ lymphocytes and type 1 helper T (Th1) cells, influences the migration and activation of these same cells.26 In mice, CCR5 deficiency is associated with a more potent T cell response to several infectious agents.27,28 Moreover, CCR5Δ32, a promoter polymorphism, might play a role in eliminating HBV infection.27,29
In Guizhou Province in China, there are 49 minority ethnic groups. Among them, 17 typical ethnic groups live in mountainous areas of the province, and have little contact with each other or the outside world due to transportation difficulties and the customs of their own cultures, languages and marriages, which results in relatively isolated genetic populations.30 This current study determined the frequencies of several polymorphic alleles (UGT1A6 [rs2070959], UGT1A1 [rs8175347], CCR5-59029 [rs1799987] and CCR5Δ32 [rs333]); and then characterized their relationship with HBV infection in subjects from two ethnic minority groups (Yi and Yao groups) compared with a Han group (the majority of Chinese) from Guizhou Province.
Subjects and methods
Study subjects
This study enrolled subjects from: (i) the minority Yao group living in Yaoshan village of Libo county; (ii) the minority Yi group living in Longjie village of Weining county; and (iii) the Han majority ethnic group living in Changchunpu village of Bijie county. The study was undertaken in the Key Laboratory of Endemic and Ethnic Diseases of the Ministry of Education of PR China (Guizhou Medical University), Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China between May 2012 and September 2014. All three counties are in Guizhou Province, China and are characterized by poor healthcare, where the populations have not been vaccinated against the HBV. These subjects were identified as infected or non-infected by determining serum levels of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) and hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (China Bio-Technology, Shanghai, China). Infected individuals exhibited repeated seropositivity for one or more of these over a period of 6 months. None of the subjects were infected with other types of viral hepatitis or HIV.
All study subjects provided written informed consent to participate and ethical permission for this study was granted by the Ethical Committee of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China (no. 2012-12038).
DNA extraction and genotyping
Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood drawn from a vein in the elbow region (3 ml) using a kit based on extraction with phenol-chloroform and then redissolved in 10 mM tris-ethylenediaminetetra-acetic acid buffer (pH 8.0) as described previously (Shanghai Shenbo Chemical, Shanghai, China).31 On the same day, the blood samples were extracted for DNA isolation at room temperature and the DNA was stored at –20°C. Before isolation, the blood samples were kept at 4°C. The sequences of the primers (Shanghai Shenbo Chemical) employed for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) genotyping are documented in Table 1.
Table 1.
Gene and loci | Upstream primer | Downstream primer | Product length, base pairs |
---|---|---|---|
UGTA1 rs8175347 | 5′-CTACATAGTCGTCCTTCTTC-3′ | 5′-ACAGTATCTTCCCAGCAT-3′ | 433 |
UGT1A6 rs2070959 | a:5′-TAAGGAGAGCAAGTTTGATGCTC-3 | 5′-GTCTGGGCTTCTGCTGATTGT-3′ | 145 |
b:5′-GGTTTTCCGTGTTCCCTGGAGGATG-3 | 5′-CTCTTGAGGACAGCTGATGC-3′ | 200 | |
c:5′-TAAGGAGAGCAAGTTTGATGCTC-3′ | 5′-CTCTTGAGGACAGCTGATGC-3′ | 300 | |
CCR5-59029 rs1799987 | 5′-GAAGAATCCTGCCACCTAT-3′ | 5′-CTCTGCTCATCCCACTACA-3′ | 559 |
CCR5△32 rs333 | 5′-AGGTCTTCATTACACCTGCAGC-3′ | 5′-CTTCTCATTTCGACACCGAAGC-3′ | 169 (wild-type)137 (mutant) |
In the case of UGT1A6 rs2070959 A and G, two alleles of a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), were characterized by using confronting two-pair primers (PCR-CTPP), specific for each allele. In primer pair 1, the base at the 3ʹ-end of the reverse primer was T and, therefore, only the A allele was amplified; while the forward primer was upstream. With primer pair 2, the base at the 3ʹ-end of the forward primer was C and, therefore, only the G allele was amplified; and the reverse primer was downstream. All four of these primers were added to each tube, and the AA genotype resulted in products of 145 and 300 base pairs (bp) in length; and the GG genotype gave 200 and 300 bp products; and heterozygotes showed all three of these products. The cycling programme involved preliminary denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 14 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 66°C for 45 s, and elongation at 72°C for 30 s for each cycle; and then followed by 18 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 52°C for 45 s, and elongation at 72°C for 30 s; and a final extension step at 72°C for 7 min. The resulting PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel.
The PCR reaction mix consisted of 25 mmol/l MgCl2, 2.5 mmol/l dNTPs for each, 10.0 μmol/l upstream or downstream primer for each (Table 1), 2.5 U/μl Taq DNA Polymerase and 100 ng DNA in a total volume of 25 μl diluted with 1X PCR buffer (Shanghai Shenbo Chemical). This reaction mixture was employed for all PCRs. The PCR reaction was performed using an Applied Biosystems® Veriti® 96-Well Thermal Cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). PCR products were separated on 2.5% agarose gels and visualized using ethidium bromide staining and UV light.
The UGT1A1 rs8175347 polymorphism (Table 1), a micro-satellite containing a thymine-adenine (TA) repeat, was detected by short tandem repeats PCR on a sequencing instrument (ABI PRISM® 310 Genetic Analyzer; Thermo Fisher Scientific). The upstream 5ʹ-end was labelled with a 6-carboxyfluorescein fluorescent tag (Shanghai GeneCore BioTechnologies, Shanghai, China). The cycling programme involved preliminary denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 61.3°C for 30 s, and elongation at 72°C for 30 s, followed by a final elongation step at 72°C for 7 min.
The CCR5-59029 rs1799987 polymorphism (Table 1) was identified using an improved protocol for PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism, including an internal control for incomplete digestion by restriction enzymes following preincubation at 95°C for 5 min. Hot start PCR was run for 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 s, annealing at 63.3°C for 30 s, and elongation at 72°C for 30 s. Digestion of the 559-bp product with Bsp1286 I (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) resulted in two (405 and 154 bp) and three (278, 154 and 127 bp) fragments from the A and G alleles, respectively, which were resolved by electrophoresis on a 2.5% agarose gel.
For CCR5Δ32 (rs333) polymorphism genotyping (Table 1), PCR amplification of genomic DNA was used.
Statistical analyses
All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS® statistical package, version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for Windows®. Each SNP/deletion was assessed for association by using χ2-test with one or two degrees of freedom in different minority groups. All tests for significance were two-sided and a P-value < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was performed for each locus.
Results
A total of 404 subjects living in Guizhou Province, China were enrolled in the study: 138 subjects from the minority Yao group living in Libo county; 101 from the minority Yi group living in Weining county; and 165 from the Han majority group living in Bijie county. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the three ethnic groups are presented in Table 2.
Table 2.
Characteristic | Yi Groupn = 101 | Yao Groupn = 138 | Han Groupn = 165 |
---|---|---|---|
Age, years | 46.39 ± 13.91 | 56.00 ± 13.20 | 44.72 ± 16.75 |
Sex | |||
Male | 50 (49.5) | 55 (39.9) | 66 (40.0) |
Female | 51 (50.5) | 83 (60.1) | 99 (60.0) |
Infected with HBVa | 53 (52.5) | 80 (58.0) | 130 (78.8) |
Not infected with HBVb | 48 (47.5) | 58 (42.0) | 35 (21.2) |
Data presented as mean ± SD of n of subjects (%).
aRepeated seropositivity for hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) and/or hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) over a 6-month period.
bSeronegativity for anti-HBc, anti-HBs or HBsAg.
The distributions of the UGT1A1, UGT1A6 and CCR5-59029 genotypes in the three groups conformed to Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. The frequency of the UGT1A1 rs8175347 genotypes in the three groups are shown in Table 3. There was a significantly different frequency of UGT1A1 rs8175347 among the Yi, Yao and Han groups (P < 0.01). Specifically, there was a significant difference in the frequency of 6TA among the three ethnic groups (P < 0.05), in which the highest frequency of 6TA was in the Yi group; and there was a significant difference in the frequency of 8TA between the Yi and Han groups (P < 0.05), in which the Han group had the highest frequency.
Table 3.
Length of product (genotype) | Yi Groupn = 101 | Yao Groupn = 138 | Han Groupn = 165 | Statistical significancea |
---|---|---|---|---|
431 bp (6TA)b | 33 (16.3) | 28 (10.1) | 26 (7.9) | χ2 = 17.56P = 0.002 |
433 bp (7TA) | 160 (79.2) | 231 (83.7) | 267 (80.9) | |
435 bp (8TA)c | 9 (4.5) | 17 (6.2) | 37 (11.2) |
Data presented as n of genes (%).
aThe statistical analysis (χ2 = 17.56 and P = 0.002) indicated a significant difference in the frequency of UGTA1 rs8175347 among these three groups.
bP < 0.05, significant differences in the frequency of 6TA among the three ethnic groups; χ2-test.
cP < 0.05, significant difference in the frequency of 8TA between the Yi and Han groups; χ2-test.
bp, base pairs.
As shown in Table 4, the frequency of 7TA carriers of UGT1A1 rs8175347 were significantly higher than those of other genotypes in both subjects with and without HBV infection from the Yi, Yao and Han groups (P < 0.01). The Yi carriers of 8TA exhibited a significantly lower risk of being HBV-infected than those with this same genotype in the other two groups (P < 0.01).
Table 4.
Ethnic groups | Genotype | HBV infected | HBV uninfected | Statistical significance | Odds ratio (95% CI) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yi* | n = 53 | n = 48 | χ2= 4.974aNS | |||
431 bp (6TA) | 21 (19.8) | 12 (12.5) | χ2 = 1.970bNS | 1.585 (0.825, 3.046) | ||
433 bp (7TA) | 83 (78.3) | 77 (80.2) | χ2 = 0.111bNS | |||
435 bp (8TA) | 2 (1.9) | 7 (7.3) | χ2 = 3.457bNS | χ2 = 16.7cP < 0.001 | ||
Yao | n = 80 | n = 58 | χ2 = 4.626aNS | |||
431 bp (6TA) | 11 (6.9) | 17 (14.7) | χ2 = 4.465bP < 0.05 | |||
433 bp (7TA) | 138 (86.3) | 93 (80.2) | χ2 = 1.820bNS | 1.215 (0.463, 3.185) | ||
435 bp (8TA) | 11 (6.9) | 6 (5.2) | χ2 = 0.337bNS | |||
Han | n = 130 | n = 35 | χ2 = 1.597aNS | |||
431 bp (6TA) | 18 (6.9) | 8 (11.4) | χ2 = 1.542bNS | |||
433 bp (7TA) | 212 (81.5) | 55 (78.6) | χ2 = 0.314bNS | 1.038 (0.906, 1.188) | ||
435 bp (8TA) | 30 (11.5) | 7 (10.0) | χ2 = 0.131bNS |
Data presented as n of genes (%).
aP-value from χ2-test with two degrees of freedom.
bP-value from χ2-test with one degree of freedom.
cP-value from χ2-test in the same genotype between Yi and Yao groups with two degrees of freedom.
*P < 0.01, significant difference in the frequency of 8TA between the Yi and Yao groups; χ2-test.
CI, confidence interval; bp, base pairs; NS, no significant difference (P ≥ 0.05).
The individuals with genotype AA of the UGT1A6 rs2070959 polymorphism in the Yi group had a higher risk for HBV infection than in the Yao and Han groups and also constituted a relatively larger proportion with infection as compared with the uninfected subjects in the same group (Table 5). In the Yao and Han groups, the genotype AA of the UGT1A6 rs2070959 polymorphism was overrepresented in the subjects with HBV infection as compared with the uninfected subjects.
Table 5.
Ethnic groups | Genotype | HBV infected | HBV uninfected | Statistical significance | Odds ratio (95% CI) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yi* | n = 53 | n = 48 | χ2 = 2.764aNS | |||
GG | 1 (1.9) | 3 (6.3) | χ2 = 1.261bNS | |||
AG | 19 (35.8) | 22 (45.8) | χ2 = 1.041bNS | |||
AA | 33 (62.3) | 23 (47.9) | χ2=2.099bNS | χ2 = 6.232cP < 0.05 | 1.793 (0.811, 3.964) | |
Yao | n = 80 | n = 58 | χ2 = 1.027aNS | |||
GG | 11 (13.8) | 6 (10.3) | χ2 = 0.361bNS | |||
AG | 32 (40.0) | 28 (48.3) | χ2 = 0.927bNS | |||
AA | 37 (46.3) | 24 (41.4) | χ2 = 0.323bNS | 1.219 (0.616, 2.143) | ||
Han# | n = 130 | n = 35 | χ2 = 3.194aNS | |||
GG | 21 (16.2) | 4 (11.4) | χ2 = 1.441bNS | χ2 = 8.67dP < 0.01 | ||
AG | 42 (32.3) | 17 (48.6) | χ2 = 3.175bP NS | |||
AA | 67 (51.5) | 14 (40.0) | χ2 = 1.469bNS | 1.595 (0.747, 3.407) |
Data presented as n of subjects (%).
aP-value from χ2-test with two degrees of freedom.
bP-value from χ2-test with one degree of freedom.
cP-value from χ2-test in the same genotype between Yi and Yao groups with two degrees of freedom.
dP-value from χ2-test in the same genotype between Han and Yi groups with two degrees of freedom.
*P < 0.05, significant difference between the Yi and Yao groups; χ2-test.
#P < 0.05, significant difference between the Han and Yi groups; χ2-test.
CI, confidence interval; NS, no significant difference (P ≥ 0.05).
As shown in Table 6, the frequency of genotype GG in the CCR5-59029 polymorphism in the Yao group was significantly higher than in the Yi and Han groups (P < 0.01), but lower in the subjects infected with HBV as compared with uninfected subjects. The frequencies of the GA genotype in Han group were higher than the other two genotypes, and in the Yi and Yao groups the frequency of the GA genotype was higher in the infected subjects than the uninfected subjects. The frequency of the AA genotype in the subjects in the Yi and Yao groups with HBV infection were higher than those of the uninfected subjects in the same groups, but there was no significant difference between the infected and uninfected subjects.
Table 6.
Ethnic groups | Genotype | HBV infected | HBV uninfected | Statistical significance | Odds ratio(95% CI) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yi* | n = 53 | n = 48 | χ2 = 4.470aNS | |||
GG | 16 (30.2) | 22 (45.8) | χ2 = 2.670bNS | |||
GA | 24 (45.3) | 21 (43.8) | χ2 = 0.024bNS | χ2 = 9.59 cP = 0.01 | 1.064 (0.485, 2.335) | |
AA | 13 (24.5) | 5 (10.4) | χ2 = 3.425bNS | 2.795 (0.914, 8.546) | ||
Yao | n = 80 | n = 58 | χ2 = 6.450aP < 0.05 | |||
GG | 38 (47.5) | 40 (69.0) | χ2 = 6.300bP < 0.05 | |||
GA | 33 (41.3) | 15 (25.9) | χ2 = 3.510bNS | 2.013 (0.963, 4.207) | ||
AA | 9 (11.3) | 3 (5.2) | χ2 = 1.546bNS | 2.324 (0.601, 8.994) | ||
Han# | n = 130 | n = 35 | χ2 = 1.100aNS | |||
GG | 45 (34.6) | 9 (25.7) | χ2 = 0.880bNS | χ2 = 20.41dP < 0.01 | 1.529 (0.660, 3.542) | |
GA | 56 (43.1) | 18 (51.4) | χ2 = 0.778bNS | |||
AA | 29 (22.3) | 8 (22.9) | χ2 = 0.005bNS |
Data presented as n of subjects (%).
aP-value from χ2-test with two degrees of freedom.
bP-value from χ2-test with one degree of freedom.
cP-value from χ2-test in the same genotype between Yi and Yao groups with two degrees of freedom.
dP-value from χ2-test in the same genotype between Han and Yao groups with two degrees of freedom.
*P < 0.01, significant difference between the Yi and Yao groups; χ2 = 9.59; P = 0.008; χ2-test.
#P < 0.05, significant difference in those with the same genotype between the Han and Yi groups; χ2 = 20.41; P < 0.01); χ2-test.
CI, confidence interval; NS, no significant difference (P ≥ 0.05).
The pair-wise evaluation did not reveal any linkage disequilibrium with other SNPs, or that the genotypes (GG, GA or AA) of the CCR5Δ32 polymorphism were associated with HBV infection in Chinese subjects (data not shown).
Discussions
In the present investigation, the potential relationship between the UGT1A1 rs8175347, UGT1A6 rs2070959, CCR5-59029 and CCR5Δ32 genetic polymorphisms and the clinical course of HBV infection was examined in the Yi, Yao and Han ethnic groups living in Guizhou Province, China. Although the importance of these genes in connection with various diseases is widely acknowledged, their potential role in HBV infection is seldom studied.3,5,6
The distributions of the UGT1A1 rs8175347 polymorphisms 6TA, 7TA and 8TA in the Yi, Yao and Han groups differed significantly, indicating that these alleles exhibit both geographic and ethnic variation. In addition, occurrence of this polymorphism differed significantly, with the highest rate of 6TA being in the Yi group and the highest rate of 8TA being in the Han group.
The UGT1A1 rs8175347 polymorphism is located in the TATA box in the promoter region of the UGT1A1 gene, which binds the TATA-binding protein (TBP) required for precise regulation of the initiation of DNA transcription.32 The normal TA repeat allele is 12 or 14 nucleotides long. A longer repeat lowers the binding affinity for TBP33 and reduces both the expression and activity of UGT1A1, which may influence the degradation and metabolism of the viral proteins.21 Accordingly, a normal UGT1A1 promoter may protect against HBV infection. In this present study, the rates of 7TA carriers of UGT1A1 rs8175347 were significantly higher than those of other genotypes in both the subjects with HBV infection and those without HVB infection from the Yi, Yao and Han groups. The Yi carriers of 8TA exhibited a significantly lower risk of being infected with HBV than those with this same genotype in the other two ethnic groups, which may indicate the important protection to HBV in this ethnic group.
Several studies have revealed associations of UGT1A6 polymorphism with both drug metabolism34 and colon cancer.35–37 Indeed, rs2070959 in the UGT1A6 gene is one of the major polymorphisms that influences the biodisposition of aspirin.38 It has been indicated that the GG genotype can decrease UGT1A6 activity21 and may render individuals more susceptible to the development of breast cancer.39 In the present study, no significant association between the GG or AG genotypes of the UGT1A6 rs2070959 and HBV infection was observed in the three groups. For the AA genotype, however, increased frequencies were associated with HBV infection in all three ethnic groups. Among them, the Yi group showed the highest risk for HBV infection as compared with the Yao and Han groups.
Numerous CCR5-positive cells are associated with chronic hepatitis,40 suggesting that this CCR5 receptor may play an important role in the progression of HBV-induced pathological injury. The CCR5Δ32 allele appears to protect against immunological diseases41 and is also associated with recovery from HBV infection.27 A CCR5Δ32 mutation is disadvantageous in fighting infectious diseases, whose clearance is dependent on interferon (INF)-γ producing T lymphocytes.42 Thus, individuals carrying at least one copy of the gene encoding a non-functional receptor (CCR5Δ32) are twice as likely to recover from hepatitis B, an effect that appears to be codominant. CCR5 may not regulate the immune response of T cells and can enhance the response. For example, in the concanavalin A-induced fulminant hepatitis murine model, which is a model for T cell-mediated hepatitis, CCR5 deficiency prevented apoptosis and up-regulated the function of hepatic natural killer T (NKT) cells.43 Such effects would favour recovery from HBV infection since NKT cells play an important role in controlling HBV replication.44 In an HBV-infected Korean cohort, 138 of the 377 individuals who spontaneously recovered carried the CCR5-32 bp deletion mutation.45
The occurrence of the CCR5Δ32 mutation varies geographically and ethnically, being 10–15% in Caucasians,46 2–5% in the Middle East and Indian subcontinent,47 and 20.93% in the Israeli population.48 In China, the incidence of CCR5Δ32 in different ethnic groups varies significantly.49 Interestingly, where the CCR5Δ32 mutation is relatively rare, the prevalence of HBV infection is higher; and when the incidence of CCR5Δ32 is high, as in Europe and the United States, the prevalence of HBV is low.47 It has been proposed that this might explain the difference between Chinese and Caucasians with respect to susceptibility to HBV infection.
The promoter variant CCR5-59029G might have lower activity and potentially attenuate recovery from HBV, in agreement with the protective effect of lower CCR5 levels. A significantly larger number of CD4+ cells expressing CCR5 and carrying two 59029A alleles has been detected previously.50 The CCR5 promoter 59029 of the GG genotype may reduce the ability of this receptor to ameliorate inflammation of the liver, demonstrating that such polymorphism may influence the outcome of HBV infection.
In this current study, the CCR5-59029 G allele was associated with resolution of HBV infection in the Yi and Yao ethnic groups. These findings were consistent with one earlier report,29 but disagreed with another;51 perhaps due to demographic factors and/or differences in experimental design. CCR5 is a specific marker for the Th1-type reaction and may thus be involved in anti-viral response.52 While inflammatory factors such as interleukin-2, INF-γ and tumour necrosis factor can potentiate inflammation of the liver,53 the CCR5-59029 GG genotype may play a protective role in HVB infection.
In conclusion, there was a significantly different frequency of UGT1A1 rs8175347 among the Yi, Yao and Han groups; and the rates of 7TA carries of UGT1A1 rs8175347 were significantly higher than those of the other genotypes. Individuals with genotype AA of UGT1A6 rs2070959 in the Yi group had a higher risk for HBV infection. The frequency of genotype GG in CCR5-59029 in the Yao group was significantly higher than in the Yi group. The mutant CCR5Δ32 allele was not associated with HBV infection. These findings may provide genetic and epidemiological evidence for a possible association of the UGT1A and CCR5-59029 polymorphisms with HBV infection in Chinese Yi and Yao populations.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Funding
This work was funded by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (no. 2013BAI05B03), the Guizhou Foundation (no. [2014]06, no. 2014[6008], no 2016[4001], no. SY[2010]3001, no. SY[2012]3135 and no. J [2008]053) and no. GY[2017]5-9).
References
- 1.Liaw YF. Antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis B: opportunities and challenges in Asia. J Hepatol 2009; 51: 403–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Brechot C. Pathogenesis of hepatitis B Virus-related hepatocelluar carcinoma: old and new paradigms. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: S56–S61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Franco E, Bagnato B, Marino MG, et al. Hepatitis B: Epidemiology and prevention in developing countries. World J Hepatol 2012; 4: 74–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jung MC andPape GR.. Immunology of hepatitis B infection. Lancet Infect Dis 2002; 2: 43–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Frodsham AJ. Host genetics and the outcome of hepatitis B viral infection. Transpl Immunol 2005; 14: 183–186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schaefer S. Hepatitis B virus: significance of genotypes. J Viral Hepat 2005; 12: 111–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Iannacone M, Sitia G, Ruggeri ZM, et al. HBV pathogenesis in animal models: recent advances on the role of platelets. J Hepatol 2007; 46: 719–726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Guidotti LG, Ishikawa T, Hobbs MV, et al. Intracellular inactivation of the hepatitis B virus by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Immunity 1996; 4: 25–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stevens CE, Beasley RP, Tsui J, et al. Vertical transmission of hepatitis B antigen in Taiwan. N Engl J Med 1975; 292: 771–774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lee WM. Hepatitis B virus infection. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 1733–1745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.McMahon BJ, Holck P, Bulkow L, et al. Serologic and clinical outcomes of 1536 Alaska Natives chronically infected with hepatitis B virus. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135: 759–768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Huo T, Wu JC, Hwang SJ, et al. Factors predictive of liver cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B: a multivariate analysis in a longitudinal study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000; 12: 687–693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lee MH, Yang HI, Liu J, et al. Prediction models of long-term cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma risk in chronic hepatitis B patients: risk scores integrating host and virus profiles. Hepatology 2013; 58: 546–554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chin R andLocarnini S.. Treatment of chronic hepatitis B: Current challenges and future directions. Rev Med Virol 2003; 13: 255–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ribeiro CS Visentainer JE andMoliterno RA.. Association of cytokine genetic polymorphism with hepatitis B infection evolution in adult patients. J Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2007; 102: 435–440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Niro GA, Fontana R, Gioffreda D, et al. Tumor necrosis factor gene polymorphisms and clearance or progression of hepatitis B virus infection. Liver Int 2005; 25: 1175–1181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.King CD, Rios GR, Green MD, et al. UDP-glucuronosyltransferases. Curr Drug Metab 2000; 1: 143–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nagar S Zalatoris JJ andBlanchard RL.. Human UGT1A6 pharmacogenetics: identification of a novel SNP, characterization of allele frequencies and functional analysis of recombinant allozymes in human liver tissue and in cultured cells. Pharmacogenetics 2004; 14: 487–499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tukey RH andStrassburg CP.. Human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases: metabolism, expression, and disease. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2000; 40: 581–616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Strassburg CP, Oldhafer K, Manns MP, et al. Differential expression of the UGT1A locus in human liver, biliary, and gastric tissue: identification of UGT1A7 and UGT1A10 transcripts in extrahepatic tissue. Mol Pharmacol 1997; 52: 212–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ciotti M, Marrone A, Potter C, et al. Genetic polymorphism in the human UGT1A6 (planar phenol) UDP-glucuronosyltransferase: pharmacological implications. Pharmacogenetics 1997; 7: 485–495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kuehl GE, Bigler J, Potter JD, et al. Glucuronidation of the aspirin metabolite salicylic acid by expressed UDP-glucuronosyltransferases and human liver microsomes. Drug Metab Dispos 2006; 34: 199–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tseng CS, Tang KS, Lo HW, et al. UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A7 genetic polymorphisms are associated with hepatocellular carcinoma risk and onset age. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 1758–1763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rehermann B, Lau D, Hoofnagle JH, et al. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte responsiveness after resolution of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. J Clin Invest 1996; 97: 1655–1665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Borish LC andSteinke JW.. Cytokines and chemokines. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003; 111: S460–S475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wong MM andFish EN.. Chemokines: attractive mediators of the immune response. Semin Immunol 2003; 15: 5–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Thio CL, Astemborski J, Bashirova A, et al. Genetic protection against hepatitis B virus conferred by CCR5Delta32: Evidence that CCR5 contributes to viral persistence. J Virol 2007; 81: 441–445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Algood HM andFlynn JL.. CCR5-deficient mice control Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection despite increased pulmonary lymphocytic infiltration. J Immunol 2004; 173: 3287–3296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chang HY, Ahn SH, Kim DY, et al. Association between CCR5 promoter polymorphisms and hepatitis B virus infection. Korean J Hepatol 2005; 11: 116–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Li B, Zhong F, Yi H, et al. Genetic polymorphism of mitochondrial DNA in Dong, Gelao, Tujia, and Yi ethnic populations from Guizhou, China. J Genet Genomics 2007; 34: 800–810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.He Y, Ren LY, Shan KR, et al. Characterization of polymorphisms in the mitochondrial DNA of twelve ethnic groups in the Guizhou province of China. Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal 2016; 27: 365–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Horsfall LJ, Zeitlyn D, Tarekegn A, et al. Prevalence of clinically relevant UGT1A alleles and haplotypes in African populations. Ann Hum Genet 2011; 75: 236–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kaplan M Hammerman C andMaisels MJ.. Bilirubin genetics for the nongeneticist: hereditary defects of neonatal bilirubin conjugation. Pediatrics 2003; 111: 886–893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.van Oijen MG, Barthélémy C, Janssen MJ, et al. Effect of genetic polymorphisms in UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A6 (UGT1A6) on acetylsalicylic acid metabolism in healthy female volunteers. Pharmacology 2009; 83: 237–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.McGreavey LE, Turner F, Smith G, et al. No evidence that polymorphisms in CYP2C8, CYP2C9, UGT1A6, PPARdelta and PPARgamma act as modifiers of the protective effect of regular NSAID use on the risk of colorectal carcinoma. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2005; 15: 713–721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Samowitz WS, Wolff RK, Curtin K, et al. Interactions between CYP2C9 and UGT1A6 polymorphisms and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in colorectal cancer prevention. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4: 894–901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Thompson CL, Plummer SJ, Merkulova A, et al. No association between cyclooxygenase-2 and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A6 genetic polymorphisms and colon cancer risk. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 2240–2244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Agúndez JA, Martínez C, Pérez-Sala D, et al. Pharmacogenomics in aspirin intolerance. Curr Drug Metab 2009; 10: 998–1008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Justenhoven C, Obazee O, Winter S, et al. The UGT1A6_19_GG genotype is a breast cancer risk factor. Front Genet 2013; 4: 104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yilmaz A, Alagozlu H, Ozdemir O, et al. Effects of the chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5)-delta32 mutation on hepatitis C virus-specific immune responses and liver tissue pathology in HCV infected patients. Hepat Mon 2014; 14: e11283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shahbazi M, Ebadi H, Fathi D, et al. CCR5-delta32 allele is associated with the risk of developing multiple sclerosis in the Iranian population. Cell Mol Neurobiol 2009; 29: 1205–1209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Woitas RP, Ahlenstiel G, Iwan A, et al. Frequency of the HIV-protective CC chemokine receptor 5-Delta32/Delta32 genotype is increased in hepatitis C. Gastroenterology 2002; 122: 1721–1728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ajuebor MN, Aspinall AI, Zhou F, et al. Lack of chemokine receptor CCR5 promotes murine fulminant liver failure by preventing the apoptosis of activated CD1d-restricted NKT cells. J Immunol 2005; 174: 8027–8037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kakimi K, Guidotti LG, Koezuka Y, et al. Natural killer T cell activation inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in vivo. J Exp Med 2000; 192: 921–930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ahn SH, Kim DY, Chang HY, et al. Association of genetic variations in CCR5 and its ligand, RANTES with clearance of hepatitis B virus in Korea. J Med Virol 2006; 78: 1564–1571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Liu R, Paxton WA, Choe S, et al. Homozygous defect in HIV-1 coreceptor accounts for resistance of some multiply-exposed individuals to HIV-1 infection. Cell 1996; 86: 367–377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Martinson JJ, Chapman NH, Rees DC, et al. Global distribution of the CCR5 gene 32-basepair deletion. Nat Genet 1997; 16: 100–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ioannidis JP, Rosenberg PS, Goedert JJ, et al. Effects of CCR5-Delta32, CCR2-64I, and SDF-1 3'A alleles on HIV-1 disease progression: An international meta-analysis of individual-patient data. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135: 782–795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Jiang JD, Wang Y, Wang ZZ, et al. Low frequency of the ccr5delta32 HIV-resistance allele in mainland China: identification of the first case of ccr5delta32 mutation in the Chinese population. Scand J Infect Dis 1999; 31: 345–348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Shieh B, Liau YE, Hsieh PS, et al. Influence of nucleotide polymorphisms in the CCR2 gene and the CCR5 promoter on the expression of cell surface CCR5 and CXCR4. Int Immunol 2000; 12: 1311–1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Cheong JY, Cho SW, Choi JY, et al. RANTES, MCP-1, CCR2, CCR5, CXCR1 and CXCR4 gene polymorphisms are not associated with the outcome of hepatitis B virus infection: results from a large scale single ethnic population. J Korean Med Sci 2007; 22: 529–535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Suneetha PV, Sarin SK, Goyal A, et al. Association between vitamin D receptor, CCR5, TNF-alpha and TNF-beta gene polymorphisms and HBV infection and severity of liver disease. J Hepatol 2006; 44: 856–863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Budhu A andWang XW.. The role of cytokines in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Leukoc Biol 2006; 80: 1197–1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]