ABSTRACT
The pharmacokinetics of daptomycin (10 mg/kg once daily) was studied in 4 critically ill pediatric patients aged 8 to 14 yrs. The area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0–∞) of plasma concentrations on day 1 ranged between 123.8 to 663.9 μg · h/ml, with lower values observed in septic and burn patients; clearance ranged from 15.1 to 80.7 ml/h/kg. Higher-than-recommended doses of daptomycin may be needed in septic children to ensure optimal drug exposure. Interpatient variability may suggest a role for therapeutic drug monitoring.
KEYWORDS: burn, children, critically ill, daptomycin, pharmacokinetics, sepsis
TEXT
Daptomycin is a lipopeptide agent active against Gram-positive microorganisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. It has been approved for adult patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTI) and right-sided endocarditis (RIE) due to S. aureus, as well as S. aureus bacteremia when associated with RIE or cSSTI. It has also been approved for treatment of pediatric (1 to 17 yrs old) patients with cSSTI by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) (1).
Most of the pediatric pharmacokinetic studies of daptomycin published to date have focused on single-dose pharmacokinetics (2–4). In a recently published randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of daptomycin for complicated skin and skin structure infections in children, multiple-dose pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in 6 patients (12 to 17 yrs old) receiving 5 mg/kg, 2 patients 7 to 11 yrs old receiving 7 mg/kg, 7 patients (2 to 6 yrs old) receiving 9 mg/kg, and 30 patients (12 to 23 months old) receiving 10 mg/kg of daptomycin once daily (QD) (5). The pediatric dosages approved by the FDA and EMA are 5, 7, 9, and 10 mg/kg QD, respectively, for patients aged 12 to 17, 7 to 11, 2 to 6, and 1 to <2 yrs old. For pediatric patients with cSSTI associated with S. aureus bacteremia, the doses approved by EMA are higher, i.e., 7, 9, and 12 mg/kg QD for patients aged 12 to 17, 7 to 11, and 1 to 6 yrs old, respectively.
Little is known, however, regarding pharmacokinetics of daptomycin in critically ill children. Daptomycin is primarily eliminated by the kidneys; several factors may affect the clearance and volume of distribution of renally excreted antibiotics in critically ill patients, potentially resulting in suboptimal concentrations and treatment failure. In sepsis, for example, high cardiac output and low systemic vascular resistance may increase renal perfusion and therefore clearance. In addition, fluid extravasation, together with aggressive fluid resuscitation and other physiologic derangements, may lead to a significant augmentation of the volume of distribution (6). Limited studies in adults have already demonstrated altered pharmacokinetics of daptomycin in critically ill patients, resulting in lower drug exposure (7, 8).
Herein, we studied multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of daptomycin administered as salvage therapy in pediatric critically ill patients.
Patients who met the following criteria were eligible for the study: 1 to 16 yrs old, hospitalized in 2 pediatric intensive care units (PICU; Heraklion University Hospital, Heraklion, Crete, and Hippokration General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece) from June 2014 to December 2016, treated with daptomycin for (proven or probable) infections caused by Gram-positive organisms not responding or intolerant to other antimicrobial agents, and with normal serum creatinine for age. The decisions to initiate/discontinue daptomycin treatment, as well as the dosage administered for each patient, were at the discretion of the treating physicians and infectious disease consultants, with no involvement of the study team.
Daptomycin (Cubicin, distributed by Novartis, Greece) was administered as a 30-min infusion dissolved in 50 ml of normal saline. Blood samples (0.5 ml) were collected immediately before and 30, 60, 90, 120, 240, and 360 min after the end of the 1st and 5th dose. Following centrifugation of the samples, plasma was collected and immediately stored at −80°C until assayed. Determination of daptomycin levels in plasma was performed using Ultra Performance liquid chromatography with UV detection at 220 nm (9).
Daptomycin pharmacokinetics were studied separately for the 1st and 5th day of administration, in order to investigate possible changes in parameters associated with alterations in patients' physiologic status. An individual pharmacokinetic model was built with Phoenix WinNonlin software (version 7.0; Certara, Princeton, NJ) and both one- and two-compartment structural models were fitted to daptomycin concentrations over time. Subsequent model selection was based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC). Various parameters were then determined for both the 1st and 5th days of daptomycin treatment, including clearance, volume of distribution, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), and areas under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0–∞) for day 1 and from time zero to 24 h (AUC0–24) for day 5.
The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients enrolled in the study were also recorded, including age, sex, body weight, body surface area, vital signs, reason for PICU admission, comorbidities, type of infection for which daptomycin was administered, coadministration of other medications (including antimicrobial agents), results of daily obtained full blood count and biochemical tests (including kidney and liver function and creatine phosphokinase levels), signs and symptoms that were likely associated with daptomycin administration, and outcome. In case serum creatinine levels were abnormal by the time of administration of the 5th dose of daptomycin, the corresponding drug concentrations were not included in the analysis.
Furthermore, based on daily vital signs and full blood count results, we determined whether the patients included in the study fulfilled the revised pediatric sepsis definition criteria (10) prior to the administration of the 1st and 5th doses of daptomycin. According to the above-referenced consensus statement, sepsis is defined as systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in the presence of infection, and age-specific, SIRS-defining, values for heart rate, respiratory rate, and leukocyte count are provided (10). In addition, the Pediatric Risk of Mortality score was calculated for all patients, in order to quantify severity of illness (11).
The study was approved by the Hospital Ethics Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from patients' parents or alternative legal representatives.
Four patients (2 female) who received daptomycin at 10 mg/kg QD were studied (Table 1). Of these, patients 1, 2, and 3 constituted a relatively homogeneous group in terms of age (median age, 9.5 yrs; range, 8 to 10 yrs), while patient 4 was an adolescent (14 yrs). Patients 2, 3, and 4 fulfilled sepsis criteria on day 1 of daptomycin treatment; patient 2 also had extended full-thickness burns. Isolated pathogens tested susceptible to daptomycin by the disk diffusion method, and outcome was favorable in all cases. For all subjects, the pharmacokinetic model with the lower AIC value was the one-compartment model. The resulting values of pharmacokinetic parameters for day 1 and day 5 of daptomycin treatment are presented in Table 2.
TABLE 1.
Patient no. | Age (yrs) | Sex | Body wt (kg) | Reason(s) for PICU admission | Type(s) of infection | Organism isolated (origin) | Medications coadministered | Day 1 |
Day 5 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sepsis criteria met? | PRISM score | Sepsis criteria met? | PRISM score | ||||||||
1 | 10 | M | 40 | Nontraumatic coma, brain edema, bilateral craniectomy, Bartonella quintana CNSb infection | Febrile skin and soft tissue infection complicating craniectomy | Staphylococcus epidermidis (blood, repeatedly) | Phenytoin, levetiracetam, midazolam, esmolol, enoxaparin sodium, ranitidine, methylprednisolone, piperacillin-tazobactam, gentamicin, rifampin, doxycycline | No | 2 | No | 2 |
2 | 8 | M | 26 | Extended (25%) full-thickness burn | Breakthrough sepsis on vancomycin | Enterococcus faecium (blood) | Ranitidine, meropenem, gentamicin, fluconazole | Yes | 2 | Yes | 1 |
3 | 9.5 | F | 45 | Rupture of appendix, peritonitis, septic shock | Surgical site infection | Enterococcus faecalis (surgical site, peritoneal fluid) | Remifentanil, propofol, ranitidine, meropenem, amikacin, metronidazole | Yes | 7 | No | 1 |
4 | 14 | F | 45 | Acute peritonitis, septic shock | Peritonitis, intra-abdominal abscesses, septic shock | Remifentanil, propofol, ranitidine, noradrenaline, meropenem, metronidazole, micafungin | Yes | 7 | Yes | 1 |
PRISM, pediatric risk of mortality.
CNS, central nervous system.
TABLE 2.
Patient no. | Day 1 |
Day 5 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clearance (ml/h/kg) | Volume of distribution (liter/kg) | AUC0–∞ (μg · h/ml) | Cmax (μg/ml) | Clearance (ml/h/kg)c | Volume of distribution (liter/kg) | AUC0–24 (μg · h/ml) (ratio)c | Cmax (μg/ml) | |
1 | 15.1 | 0.16 | 663.9 | 59.8 | 9.9 (0.65) | 0.28 | 1,009.9 (1.52) | 60.4 |
2 | 80.7a | 0.26 | 123.8b | 35.4 | 56.4 (0.69) | 0.55 | 177.3 (1.43) | 19.2 |
3 | 28.1a | 0.28 | 355.8b | 33.9 | 27.7 (0.98) | 0.34 | 360.1 (1.01) | 32.9 |
4 | 42.3 | 0.23 | 236.5 | 40.7 | 15.4 (0.36) | 0.26 | 651.4 (2.75) | 49.8 |
Ratios of corresponding clearance values to that of patient 1: 5.34 for patient 2 and 1.86 for patient 3.
Ratios of corresponding AUC0–∞ values to that of patient 1: 0.19 for patient 2 and 0.53 for patient 3.
In parentheses, ratio of each day 5 value to the corresponding day 1 value.
Αmong patients 1, 2, and 3 (similar age), on day 1 of daptomycin administration, those with sepsis (2 and 3) had higher clearance (ratios, 5.34 and 1.86) and lower AUC0–∞ values (ratios, 0.19 and 0.53) compared to those of patient 1 (Table 2). Notably, patient 2, a burn patient with sepsis, exhibited the highest clearance and lowest AUC0–∞ values. These interpatient differences were also observed in a proportional way on day 5. Between day 1 and day 5 of daptomycin treatment, notable intrapatient differences in pharmacokinetic values were observed. In particular, a trend for a decrease in clearance values (corresponding ratios, 0.36 to 0.98) and an increase in AUC (corresponding ratios of AUC0–24/AUC0–∞, 1.01 to 2.75) was observed for all 4 patients (Table 2).
The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters best correlating with daptomycin efficacy in vivo are AUC/MIC and Cmax/MIC ratios. The mean AUC0–24/MIC values associated with static, 1-log killing, and 2-log killing effects against S. aureus are 438 ± 67, 666 ± 87, and 1,061 ± 296, respectively (1, 8). Daptomycin exhibits linear pharmacokinetics when administered at doses up to 12 mg/kg QD in healthy adults (12). A dose of 4 mg/kg QD results in a mean AUC0–24 on day 7 of 494 μg · h/ml (13). In pediatric patients with cSSTI, comparable exposures were obtained following administration of 7 mg/kg QD and 5 mg/kg QD in those aged 7 to 11 yrs and 12 to 17 yrs, respectively (5). Despite administration of a higher dose of daptomycin (10 mg/kg QD), the AUC0–∞ values obtained on day 1 for the three septic patients in our study (patients 2, 3, and 4) were either comparable (patient 3) or markedly lower (patients 2 and 4) than those reported for pediatric cSSTI patients. These findings are consistent with the significantly higher clearance values obtained for daptomycin in these patients compared to those in the pediatric cSSTI patients (16 and 13 ml/h/kg for those aged 7 to 11 and 12 to 17 yrs, respectively) (5). Taken together, these results suggest an alteration of pharmacokinetics of daptomycin in pediatric patients with sepsis, characterized by increased clearance and suboptimal AUC values. Falcone et al. have previously demonstrated augmented daptomycin clearance associated with decreased AUC0–∞ and AUC0–24 values in critically ill adult patients receiving daptomycin (8). Di Paolo et al., in a population pharmacokinetic study of adult patients with severe infections, also demonstrated a higher volume of distribution and lower plasma concentrations of daptomycin compared with those in healthy volunteers (7).
In healthy adult volunteers receiving daptomycin, the accumulation index between days 1 and 7 of therapy was approximately 1.2 (13). In our patients, a more pronounced increase was observed in AUC0–24 values on day 5 compared to the AUC0–∞ values on day 1 (as in patient 4; Table 2), which correlates nicely with a decrease in daptomycin clearance. These findings reflect alterations in patients' hemodynamic status associated with recovery from sepsis. From a practical point of view, however, these changes in drug exposure, both from day 1 to day 5 and among patients treated with the same dose of daptomycin, underscore the importance of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in order to avoid subtherapeutic levels or dose-related adverse events. This need for TDM has recently been highlighted for adult patients receiving daptomycin for bone and joint infections (14).
The findings of this study were based on a small number of patients and should therefore be interpreted with caution. However, they set the basis for a more comprehensive study of daptomycin pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients.
In summary, we herein demonstrated significantly lower drug exposure in pediatric septic patients treated with daptomycin compared to that in healthy volunteers or patients with milder infections. This suboptimal exposure appears to be associated with augmented daptomycin clearance and was more pronounced in the burn patient. Therefore, higher-than-recommended doses of daptomycin may be required for children with sepsis in order to ensure appropriate exposure. The observed interpatient and interday variability suggests a role for therapeutic drug monitoring.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by a grant from the Greek Ministry of Education, Department of Research and Technology (ARISTEIA II, grant 5393).
REFERENCES
- 1.Gonzalez-Ruiz A, Seaton RA, Hamed K. 2016. Daptomycin: an evidence-based review of its role in the treatment of Gram-positive infections. Infect Drug Resist 9:47–58. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S99046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Abdel-Rahman SM, Benziger DP, Jacobs RF, Jafri HS, Hong EF, Kearns GL. 2008. Single-dose pharmacokinetics of daptomycin in children with suspected or proved gram-positive infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J 27:330–334. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318160edfc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Abdel-Rahman SM, Chandorkar G, Akins RL, Bradley JS, Jacobs RF, Donovan J, Benziger DP. 2011. Single-dose pharmacokinetics and tolerability of daptomycin 8 to 10 mg/kg in children aged 2 to 6 years with suspected or proved Gram-positive infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J 30:712–714. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31820f6575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bradley JS, Benziger D, Bokesch P, Jacobs R. 2014. Single-dose pharmacokinetics of daptomycin in pediatric patients 3–24 months of age. Pediatr Infect Dis J 33:936–939. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bradley J, Glasser C, Patino H, Arnold SR, Arrieta A, Congeni B, Daum RS, Kojaoghlanian T, Yoon M, Anastasiou D, Wolf DJ, Bokesch P. 2017. Daptomycin for complicated skin infections: a randomized trial. Pediatrics 139:e20162477. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vincent JL, Bassetti M, Francois B, Karam G, Chastre J, Torres A, Roberts JA, Taccone FS, Rello J, Calandra T, De Backer D, Welte T, Antonelli M. 2016. Advances in antibiotic therapy in the critically ill. Crit Care 20:133. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1285-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Di Paolo A, Tascini C, Polillo M, Gemignani G, Nielsen EI, Bocci G, Karlsson MO, Menichetti F, Danesi R. 2013. Population pharmacokinetics of daptomycin in patients affected by severe Gram-positive infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 42:250–255. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Falcone M, Russo A, Venditti M, Novelli A, Pai MP. 2013. Considerations for higher doses of daptomycin in critically ill patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 57:1568–1576. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Antachopoulos C, Iosifidis E, Sarafidis K, Bazoti F, Gikas E, Katragkou A, Drossou-Agakidou V, Roilides E. 2012. Serum levels of daptomycin in pediatric patients. Infection 40:367–371. doi: 10.1007/s15010-011-0240-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Goldstein B, Giroir B, Randolph A. 2005. International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics. Pediatr Crit Care Med 6:2–8. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000149131.72248.E6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pollack MM, Ruttimann UE, Getson PR. 1998. Pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) score. Crit Care Med 16:1110–1116. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198811000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Benvenuto M, Benziger DP, Yankelev S, Vigliani G. 2006. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of daptomycin at doses up to 12 milligrams per kilogram of body weight once daily in healthy volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:3245–3249. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00247-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dvorchik BH, Brazier D, DeBruin MF, Arbeit RD. 2003. Daptomycin pharmacokinetics and safety following administration of escalating doses once daily to healthy subjects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:1318–1323. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.4.1318-1323.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Goutelle S, Roux S, Gagnieu MC, Valour F, Lustig S, Ader F, Laurent F, Chidiac C, Ferry T. 2016. Pharmacokinetic variability of daptomycin during prolonged therapy for bone and joint infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:3148–3151. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02597-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]