ABSTRACT
The imidazopyridines are a promising new class of antitubercular agents with potent activity in vitro and in vivo. We isolated mutants of Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistant to a representative imidazopyridine; the mutants had large shifts (>20-fold) in MIC. Whole-genome sequencing revealed mutations in Rv1339, a hypothetical protein of unknown function. We isolated mutants resistant to three further compounds from the series; resistant mutants isolated from two of the compounds had single nucleotide polymorphisms in Rv1339 and resistant mutants isolated from the third compound had single nucleotide polymorphisms in QcrB, the proposed target for the series. All the strains were resistant to two compounds, regardless of the mutation, and a strain carrying the QcrB T313I mutation was resistant to all of the imidazopyridine derivatives tested, confirming cross-resistance. By monitoring pH homeostasis and ATP generation, we confirmed that compounds from the series were targeting QcrB; imidazopyridines disrupted pH homeostasis and depleted ATP, providing further evidence of an effect on the electron transport chain. A representative compound was bacteriostatic against replicating bacteria, consistent with a mode of action against QcrB. The series had a narrow inhibitory spectrum, with no activity against other bacterial species. No synergy or antagonism was seen with other antituberculosis drugs under development. In conclusion, our data support the hypothesis that the imidazopyridine series functions by reducing ATP generation via inhibition of QcrB.
KEYWORDS: mycobacterium, antibacterial, respiration, cytochrome oxidase, ATP, antibiotics, drug discovery, drug resistance, mycobacteria
INTRODUCTION
Tuberculosis remains a serious disease of global importance, killing millions each year (1). The current treatment for disease caused by drug-sensitive bacteria is a combination regimen that includes isoniazid and rifampin, targeting bacterial cell wall synthesis and transcription, respectively (2). Newer agents, such as bedaquiline, target energy generation via inhibition of ATP synthesis. We are interested in developing new antitubercular compounds that can synergize with other agents in clinical use or under development.
A number of compound types that appear to target the electron transport chain have been identified. Among them, several related series target QcrB, a component of the terminal cytochrome oxidase (3–5). We previously investigated the imidazopyridine (IMP) series and demonstrated characteristics of the molecules that suggest they may target QcrB. The imidazopyridines have the same heterocyclic core and are structurally related to the clinical candidate Q203, which is proposed to target QcrB directly (4).
In this study, we isolated and confirmed Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains with mutations that confer resistance to the imidazopyridines. We also determined the effects of compound exposure on pH homeostasis and ATP depletion, which are indicative of QcrB inhibition. Finally, we demonstrate that this class of molecules has good microbiological properties, showing potent activity against extracellular and intracellular mycobacteria, as well as bacteriostatic activity against replicating bacteria.
RESULTS
We were interested in determining the target of the imidazopyridines (Fig. 1), a compound series that has good potency against extracellular and intracellular bacteria, as well as efficacy in a mouse model of infection against M. tuberculosis (6–13).
Mutations in Rv1339 and QcrB confer resistance to imidazopyridines.
We isolated mutants resistant to a representative compound from the series (ND-009628) (Fig. 1). Resistance was confirmed for each mutant, and we identified three mutants with a ≥20-fold shift in the MIC (Table 1). Whole-genome sequencing of three confirmed resistant isolates revealed two different mutations in Rv1339. We confirmed mutations in Rv1339 by PCR amplification and sequencing. The mutations identified were nonsynonymous mutations of either proline to leucine or serine to proline in adjacent loci. Given the nature of these mutations, which involved changes to proline, we predicted they would result in structural changes in the protein. Since previous work suggested that the target of the imidazopyridines is QcrB, a component of the respiratory chain, we sequenced QcrB in all three resistant isolates, but there were no mutations.
TABLE 1.
Compound | Strain identifier | SNP | MIC99 (μM)a |
---|---|---|---|
ND-009628 | WTb | NAc | 5.0 |
ND-009628 | LP-0106906-RM1 | Rv1339 P121L | >100 |
ND-009628 | LP-0106906-RM2 | Rv1339 S120P | >100 |
ND-009628 | LP-0106906-RM3 | Rv1339 P121L | 100 |
ND-008454 | WT | NA | 1.25 |
ND-008454 | LP-0106898-RM5 | QcrB T313I | >10 |
ND-008454 | LP-0106898-RM6 | QcrB T313I | >10 |
ND-008454 | LP-0106898-RM1 | QcrB T313I | >10 |
ND-009761 | WT | NA | 3.1 |
ND-009761 | LP-0106908-RM1 | Rv1339 E219K | 12.5 |
ND-009761 | LP-0106908-RM3 | Rv1339 S119W | 12.5 |
ND-009761 | LP-0106908-RM4 | Rv1339 T14A | 12.5 |
ND-009872 | WT | NA | 1.0 |
ND-009872 | LP-0106909-RM1 | Rv1339 T14A | 5.0 |
ND-009872 | LP-0106909-RM4 | Rv1339 T14A | 5.0 |
ND-009872 | LP-0106909-RM5 | Rv1339 T14A | 5.0 |
The MIC99s (the minimum concentrations required to prevent 99% of growth) of the indicated compounds were determined on solid medium.
WT, wild type.
NA, not applicable.
Since we did not expect mutations in Rv1339, we selected three additional compounds (ND-008454, ND-009761, and ND-009872) (Fig. 1) and isolated resistant mutants for characterization; resistance was confirmed on solid medium, with MIC shifts of >4-fold for each compound (Fig. 1 and Table 1). For compounds ND-009761 and ND-009872, mutations were seen in Rv1339 only. In contrast, for compound ND-008454, we found the mutation in all strains sequenced to be T313I in QcrB.
For each compound, we saw mutations either in Rv1339 or in QcrB. Therefore, we determined whether the mutations were specific to each compound or if the strains were cross-resistant to other members of the compound class (Table 2). We selected two compounds: ND-008454, for which mutations were noted in qcrB, and ND-009872, for which mutations were noted in Rv1339. We tested the two compounds against each of the mutant strains (one qcrB and five Rv1339 mutant strains). In all cases, we saw resistance with large shifts: for ND-008454, the shift was 33-fold, and for ND-009872, the shift was >8-fold. We also determined the MICs of five compounds for the QcrBT313I mutant strain in liquid medium (Table 3); the strain demonstrated increased resistance to all the compounds, with at least 8-fold shifts in the MIC, and in most cases >20-fold shifts. Our data confirmed that mutations in either Rv1339 or QcrB did confer resistance to the compound class.
TABLE 2.
Strain | SNP | MIC99 (μM)a |
|
---|---|---|---|
ND-008454 | ND-009872 | ||
WT | NA | 0.30 | 1.3 |
LP-0106898-RM5 | QcrB T313I | 10 | >10 |
LP-0106906-RM1 | Rv1339 P121L | 10 | >10 |
LP-0106906-RM2 | Rv1339 S120P | 10 | >10 |
LP-0106908-RM1 | Rv1339 E219K | 10 | >10 |
LP-0106908-RM3 | Rv1339 S119W | 10 | >10 |
LP-0106909-RM1 | Rv1339 T14A | 10 | >10 |
The MIC99s of the indicated compounds were determined on solid medium.
TABLE 3.
Compound | MIC90 (μM)a |
|
---|---|---|
WT | QcrBT313I | |
ND-009873 | 0.32 | 7.5 |
ND-009872 | 0.37 | 6.5 |
ND-009761 | 2.4 | >20 |
ND-008667 | 0.56 | 12 |
ND-008454 | 0.46 | >20 |
The MIC90s of the indicated compounds were determined on liquid medium.
Imidazopyridines disrupt pH homeostasis in M. tuberculosis.
Our data supported the idea that the IMP series targets QcrB, a key component of the electron transport chain. However, since we identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in Rv1339 that also conferred resistance, we looked at the effects of compounds on cellular processes controlled by respiration. QcrB is a proton-pumping member of the electron transport chain, and its inhibition would be predicted to disrupt the pH gradient across the membrane. Therefore, we looked at the ability of compounds to disrupt pH homeostasis. We used a ratiometric green fluorescent protein (GFP) to monitor the intracellular pH (pHIB) (14) in M. tuberculosis exposed to compounds over 2 days in acidic medium. We defined activity as the ability to reduce the pHIB below 6.5. Both compounds were able to disrupt pH homeostasis in a dose-dependent fashion (Fig. 2).
Imidazopyridines deplete intracellular ATP levels in M. tuberculosis.
In addition to effects on the maintenance of the proton gradient, we expected that inhibition of QcrB would have a direct effect on ATP levels. We predicted that, similar to the ATP synthase inhibitor bedaquiline, ATP levels would be depleted in a dose-dependent manner after exposure to IMP compounds. We tested this and demonstrated that, indeed, we did see depletion of ATP (Fig. 3).
Imidazopyridines are bacteriostatic against replicating M. tuberculosis.
We are interested in the potential of imidazopyridines as novel antitubercular agents. We previously demonstrated potent inhibitory activity of compounds from this series against M. tuberculosis in liquid culture (8, 13). We determined whether this inhibitory activity could translate into loss of bacterial viability. We monitored bacterial viability by CFU under aerobic, replicating growth conditions using a representative compound (ND-008454). We first compared activity levels over 7 days at 10× MIC; the compound inhibited growth but showed little killing in this short time (Fig. 4A). In contrast, the frontline drug rifampin showed demonstrable killing, with >2-log-unit decreases in viable bacteria over 7 days. We repeated the experiment over a longer time course with different compound exposures (Fig. 4B and C). Over 21 days, we saw a minimal kill rate of 1 to 2 log units at 10× MIC. The kill rate was independent of the concentration; thus, the kill kinetics are time dependent. According to standard guidelines from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (15), the compounds are bacteriostatic against replicating bacteria.
Imidazopyridines have potent activity against intracellular M. tuberculosis.
The ability of compounds to penetrate into eukaryotic cells and act against intracellular M. tuberculosis is a desirable characteristic in novel drugs. We tested the intracellular activities of the compounds in this study (Table 4). All the compounds were active, with good potency (IC90s ranged from 1.8 to 13 μM). In parallel, we tested for cytotoxicity against the macrophage line; none of the compounds were cytotoxic against the THP1 cells (50% toxic concentration [TC50], >50 μM). These are promising properties for new antitubercular agents. We also tested for cytotoxicity against HepG2 cells in glucose medium; all the compounds were inactive, with TC50s of >100 μM.
TABLE 4.
Compound | IC50 (μM) | IC90 (μM) | TC50a (μM) |
---|---|---|---|
ND-008667 | 0.15 | 3.1 | >50 |
ND-009628 | 1.7 | 8.5 | >50 |
ND-009872 | 0.39 | 1.8 | >50 |
ND-009761 | 3.0 | 13 | >50 |
ND-008454 | 0.20 | 3.0 | >50 |
The TC50s (50% toxic concentrations; concentrations of compounds required to inhibit growth by 50%) were determined for uninfected THP-1 cells.
Imidazopyridines are inactive against other species.
We determined the spectrum of activity for the series. None of the compounds we tested were active against the closely related organism Mycobacterium smegmatis (Table 5). We tested two compounds against representative Gram-negative (Escherichia coli) and Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) species, but none had any activity (Table 5). This suggests that the series has a narrow spectrum and is largely selective for M. tuberculosis.
TABLE 5.
Compound | MIC99 (μM)a |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
M. smegmatis | E. coli | S. aureus | M. tuberculosis | |
ND-008454 | >200 | >10 | >10 | 1.25 |
ND-009872 | >200 | >100 | >100 | 0.50 |
ND-008667 | >200 | NT | NT | 1.3 |
ND-009628 | >200 | NT | NT | 5.0 |
The MIC99s of the indicated compounds were determined on solid medium. NT, not tested.
Imidazopyridines do not have synergy with other agents.
We tested whether the IMP series had any synergy with other agents under development; we tested ND-008454 with PA824 (16), BTZ043 (17), SQ109 (18), and amoxicillin, representing inhibitors with different targets. The compounds were tested in a classic checkerboard assay to determine the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI). For each combination tested, we saw neither synergy nor antagonism, with FICIs of 2 (data not shown).
DISCUSSION
Previous work has proposed that QcrB is the target of molecules with structural similarity to the imidazopyridines, and our work has demonstrated compound profiles consistent with this hypothesis. Surprisingly, we identified a number of mutations in Rv1339 that have not previously been associated with resistance to structural homologs, such as Q203. The SNPs observed suggest that they would result in structural changes to the protein. Rv1339 is a member of the β-lactamase superfamily, so the protein structure does not give much insight into its possible role in the cell, but it could play a role in cell wall synthesis, and mutations could lead to structural alterations that affect compound penetration. In support of this, the protein is located in the membrane fraction (19), and the potency of Q203 is affected by efflux (20).
We have previously isolated strains with different mutations in Rv1339 (V90M or Y94C) that are resistant to another series of molecules that also target QcrB, the phenoxyalkylbenzimidazoles. In the latter case, the level of resistance conferred was low in comparison to the level of resistance seen in strains with QcrB mutations, and resistance to all molecules in the class was not conferred. Thus, we discounted the possibility that Rv1339 was the target of the phenoxyalkylbenzimidazoles. However, in this study, we saw high-level resistance to all the compounds conferred by mutations in Rv1339, as well as in QcrB. Since the IMP compounds disrupt pH homeostasis and ATP generation, we propose that their target is QcrB and that inhibition of QcrB is the mode of action. We think it unlikely that Rv1339 is the primary target of the IMP series but hypothesize that it could have an effect on cell wall or cell envelope structure, thereby impacting compound permeation or export.
A representative compound from the series showed bacteriostatic activity against replicating bacteria in aerobic culture. This is consistent with the profile we have seen for other QcrB inhibitors. It is of interest, that despite this lack of rapid killing activity in vitro, IMPs and related compounds, such as Q203, are effective against M. tuberculosis in vivo. Although we did not see synergy with IMPs and other agents in growth inhibition assays, we have recently demonstrated that QcrB inhibitors can synergize with other agents when bacterial kill rates are measured and that this potentiation can be seen against replicating bacteria. It would be interesting to determine if the IMP series has similar properties and so could be developed as a key component of a new drug regimen.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Compounds.
The syntheses of all the imidazopyridines described in this study have been previously reported (6–13). BTZ043, PA824, SQ109, and bedaquiline were synthesized in house for use.
Determination of MICs.
MICs for M. tuberculosis cultured aerobically in Middlebrook 7H9 medium supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) oleic acid–bovine serum albumin (BSA)–d-glucose–catalase (OADC) (Becton Dickinson) and 0.05% (wt/vol) Tween 80 (7H9-Tw-OADC) were determined in liquid medium after 5 days of growth, as described previously (13). For synergy testing, compound combinations were tested in checkerboard fashion in 96-well plates; the compounds were diluted serially either in the x or y axis. Growth inhibition curves were fitted using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm, and MICs were reported as the concentrations required to inhibit growth by 90% (IC90s). For synergy, the FICI was defined as follows: FICI = FICA + FICB, where FICA is the MIC of compound A in the presence of compound B divided by the MIC of compound A alone and FICB is the MIC of compound B in the presence of compound A divided by the MIC of compound B alone. An FICI of ≤0.5 is synergistic, and an FICI of ≥4 is antagonistic (21). MICs in solid medium were determined by plating on Middlebrook 7H10 medium plus 10% (vol/vol) OADC-containing compound and incubating them for 3 to 4 weeks before scoring growth in 96-well plates (MIC) or counting CFU on 90-mm petri plates (MIC99).
Isolation and characterization of resistant mutants.
Spontaneous resistant mutants were isolated as described previously, and resistance was confirmed on solid medium (22). Briefly, 107 to 109 bacteria were plated at 5× to 10× MIC on solid medium. Colonies appearing after 3 to 6 weeks were cultured and tested for resistance. Whole-genome sequencing was carried out on confirmed resistant isolates (EdgeBio). Mutations were confirmed by sequencing of PCR-amplified products from chromosomal DNA.
Determination of eukaryotic cytotoxicity.
Cytotoxicity was tested against the HepG2 cell line (ATCC) as described previously (23). Compounds were tested as 10-point, 3-fold serial dilutions in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (final assay concentration, 1% DMSO), and viability was measured using CellTiter-Glo (Promega). Inhibition curves were fitted using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. The TC50 was defined as the concentration required to reduce cell viability by 50% after 2 days of incubation.
Determination of intrabacterial pH.
M. tuberculosis expressing ratiometric GFP (14) was resuspended in phosphate citrate buffer, pH 4.5, containing 0.05% (wt/vol) tyloxapol and exposed to serial dilutions of compounds in DMSO (final concentration, 2% DMSO) for 2 days. Fluorescence was measured at excitation/emission wavelengths of 400/516 and 485/516 nm (14). The ratio was calculated, and the intrabacterial pH was calculated from the standard curve.
Measurement of intrabacterial ATP levels.
M. tuberculosis was exposed to compounds for 24 h. ATP levels were measured using the BacTiter-Glo assay kit (Promega) and expressed as relative luminescence units (RLU).
Kill kinetics.
For aerobic, replicating conditions, late-log-phase bacteria were inoculated into 7H9-Tw-OADC medium containing compounds (final DMSO concentration, 2%) at 105 to 106 CFU/ml. CFU were determined by plating 10-fold serial dilutions onto Middlebrook 7H10 agar containing 10% (vol/vol) OADC (7H10-OADC), and colonies were counted after 3 to 4 weeks.
Intracellular activity.
THP-1 cells were cultured in complete RPMI (RPMI 1640, 10% fetal bovine serum [FBS], 2 mM Corning Glutagro, 1 mM sodium pyruvate) and differentiated into macrophage-like cells using 80 nM phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) overnight at 37°C, 5% CO2. THP-1 cells were infected with M. tuberculosis expressing luciferase (24) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1 in complete RPMI overnight. Infected cells were washed and seeded at 4 × 104 cells per well in 96-well plates. The compounds were tested as a 10-point, 3-fold dilution series (final DMSO concentration, 0.5%). Infected cells were exposed to the compounds for 3 days in a humidified atmosphere of 37°C and 5% CO2. Bacterial growth was measured in RLU. Growth inhibition curves were fitted using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm; the IC50 and IC90 were defined as the concentrations resulting in 50% and 90% inhibition of intracellular growth, respectively.
THP1 cytotoxicity.
Uninfected THP1 cells were cultured in complete RPMI and differentiated into macrophage-like cells using 80 nM PMA overnight at 37°C and 5% CO2. The cells were seeded and exposed to the compounds as described above. Macrophage viability was measured in RLU using CellTiter-Glo (Promega). The TC50 was defined as the compound concentration that resulted in 50% viability.
Spectrum.
MICs were determined using the serial dilution agar method. S. aureus RN4220 and E. coli DH5α were grown on LB agar and M. smegmatis mc2155 on Middlebrook 7H10 agar plates plus 10% (vol/vol) OADC supplement. A late-log-phase culture was plated (105 CFU/ml) and incubated at 37°C until large colonies formed on the no-compound control plates. The MIC99 was defined as the lowest concentration of compound that had less than 1% growth.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Lena Anoshchenko, James Vela, Dean Thompson, David Roberts, and Anisa Tracy for technical assistance. We thank Joshua Odingo for useful discussion.
The work was funded in part by Eli Lilly and Company in support of the mission of the Lilly TB Drug Discovery Initiative and in part by NIAID of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers R01AI099188 (to T.P.) and R01AI054193 (to M.J.M.).
REFERENCES
- 1.WHO. 2017. Global tuberculosis report. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
- 2.WHO. 2017. Guidelines for treatment of drug-susceptible tuberculosis and patient care, 2017 update. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kang S, Kim RY, Seo MJ, Lee S, Kim YM, Seo M, Seo JJ, Ko Y, Choi I, Jang J, Nam J, Park S, Kang H, Kim HJ, Kim J, Ahn S, Pethe K, Nam K, No Z, Kim J. 2014. Lead optimization of a novel series of imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine amides leading to a clinical candidate (Q203) as a multi- and extensively-drug-resistant anti-tuberculosis agent. J Med Chem 57:5293–5305. doi: 10.1021/jm5003606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pethe K, Bifani P, Jang J, Kang S, Park S, Ahn S, Jiricek J, Jung J, Jeon HK, Cechetto J, Christophe T, Lee H, Kempf M, Jackson M, Lenaerts AJ, Pham H, Jones V, Seo MJ, Kim YM, Seo M, Seo JJ, Park D, Ko Y, Choi I, Kim R, Kim SY, Lim S, Yim SA, Nam J, Kang H, Kwon H, Oh CT, Cho Y, Jang Y, Kim J, Chua A, Tan BH, Nanjundappa MB, Rao SP, Barnes WS, Wintjens R, Walker JR, Alonso S, Lee S, Kim J, Oh S, Oh T, Nehrbass U, Han SJ, No Z, Lee J, Brodin P, Cho SN, Nam K, Kim J. 2013. Discovery of Q203, a potent clinical candidate for the treatment of tuberculosis. Nat Med 19:1157–1160. doi: 10.1038/nm.3262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Abrahams KA, Cox JA, Spivey VL, Loman NJ, Pallen MJ, Constantinidou C, Fernandez R, Alemparte C, Remuinan MJ, Barros D, Ballell L, Besra GS. 2012. Identification of novel imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine inhibitors targeting M. tuberculosis QcrB. PLoS One 7:e52951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cheng Y, Moraski GC, Cramer J, Miller MJ, Schorey JS. 2014. Bactericidal activity of an imidazo[1, 2-a]pyridine using a mouse M. tuberculosis infection model. PLoS One 9:e87483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Moraski GC, Cheng Y, Cho S, Cramer JW, Godfrey A, Masquelin T, Franzblau SG, Miller MJ, Schorey J. 2016. Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-3-carboxamides are active antimicrobial agents against Mycobacterium avium infection in vivo. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:5018–5022. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00618-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Moraski GC, Markley LD, Cramer J, Hipskind PA, Boshoff H, Bailey M, Alling T, Ollinger J, Parish T, Miller MJ. 2013. Advancement of imidazo[1,2-a]pyridines with improved pharmacokinetics and nanomolar activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. ACS Med Chem Lett 4:675–679. doi: 10.1021/ml400088y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Moraski GC, Markley LD, Hipskind PA, Boshoff H, Cho S, Franzblau SG, Miller MJ. 2011. Advent of imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-3-carboxamides with potent multi- and extended drug resistant antituberculosis activity. ACS Med Chem Lett 2:466–470. doi: 10.1021/ml200036r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Moraski GC, Miller PA, Bailey MA, Ollinger J, Parish T, Boshoff HI, Cho S, Anderson JR, Mulugeta S, Franzblau SG, Miller MJ. 2015. Putting tuberculosis (TB) to rest: transformation of the sleep aid, Ambien, and “anagrams” generated potent antituberculosis agents. ACS Infect Dis 1:85–90. doi: 10.1021/id500008t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Moraski GC, Oliver AG, Markley LD, Cho S, Franzblau SG, Miller MJ. 2014. Scaffold-switching: an exploration of 5,6-fused bicyclic heteroaromatics systems to afford antituberculosis activity akin to the imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-3-carboxylates. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 24:3493–3498. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.05.062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Moraski GC, Seeger N, Miller PA, Oliver AG, Boshoff HI, Cho S, Mulugeta S, Anderson JR, Franzblau SG, Miller MJ. 2016. Arrival of imidazo[2,1-b]thiazole-5-carboxamides: potent anti-tuberculosis agents that target QcrB. ACS Infect Dis 2:393–398. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.5b00154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ollinger J, Bailey MA, Moraski GC, Casey A, Florio S, Alling T, Miller MJ, Parish T. 2013. A dual read-out assay to evaluate the potency of compounds active against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS One 8:e60531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Darby CM, Ingolfsson HI, Jiang X, Shen C, Sun M, Zhao N, Burns K, Liu G, Ehrt S, Warren JD, Andersen OS, Brickner SJ, Nathan C. 2013. Whole cell screen for inhibitors of pH homeostasis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS One 8:e68942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.CLSI. 1999. Methods for determining bactericidal activity of antimicrobial agents; approved guideline. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Li SY, Tasneen R, Tyagi S, Soni H, Converse PJ, Mdluli K, Nuermberger EL. 2017. Bactericidal and sterilizing activity of a novel regimen with bedaquiline, pretomanid, moxifloxacin, and pyrazinamide in a murine model of tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e00913-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00913-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Makarov V, Manina G, Mikusova K, Mollmann U, Ryabova O, Saint-Joanis B, Dhar N, Pasca MR, Buroni S, Lucarelli AP, Milano A, De Rossi E, Belanova M, Bobovska A, Dianiskova P, Kordulakova J, Sala C, Fullam E, Schneider P, McKinney JD, Brodin P, Christophe T, Waddell S, Butcher P, Albrethsen J, Rosenkrands I, Brosch R, Nandi V, Bharath S, Gaonkar S, Shandil RK, Balasubramanian V, Balganesh T, Tyagi S, Grosset J, Riccardi G, Cole ST. 2009. Benzothiazinones kill Mycobacterium tuberculosis by blocking arabinan synthesis. Science 324:801–804. doi: 10.1126/science.1171583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Protopopova M, Hanrahan C, Nikonenko B, Samala R, Chen P, Gearhart J, Einck L, Nacy CA. 2005. Identification of a new antitubercular drug candidate, SQ109, from a combinatorial library of 1,2-ethylenediamines. J Antimicrob Chemother 56:968–974. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gu S, Chen J, Dobos KM, Bradbury EM, Belisle JT, Chen X. 2003. Comprehensive proteomic profiling of the membrane constituents of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain. Mol Cell Proteomics 2:1284–1296. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M300060-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jang J, Kim R, Woo M, Jeong J, Park DE, Kim G, Delorme V. 2017. Efflux attenuates the antibacterial activity of Q203 in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e02637-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02637-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Odds FC. 2003. Synergy, antagonism, and what the chequerboard puts between them. J Antimicrob Chemother 52:1. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ioerger TR, Feng YA, Ganesula K, Chen X, Dobos KM, Fortune S, Jacobs W Jr, Mizrahi V, Parish T, Rubin E, Sassetti C, Sacchettini JC. 2010. Variation among genome sequences of H37Rv strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from multiple laboratories. J Bacteriol 192:3645–3653. doi: 10.1128/JB.00166-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zuniga ES, Korkegian A, Mullen S, Hembre EJ, Ornstein PL, Cortez G, Biswas K, Kumar N, Cramer J, Masquelin T, Hipskind PA, Odingo J, Parish T. 2017. The synthesis and evaluation of triazolopyrimidines as anti-tubercular agents. Bioorg Med Chem 25:3922–3946. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2017.05.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Andreu N, Fletcher T, Krishnan N, Wiles S, Robertson BD. 2012. Rapid measurement of antituberculosis drug activity in vitro and in macrophages using bioluminescence. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:404–414. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]