Abstract
Objective
The number of long-term care (LTC) users and the associated expenditures in Japan are increasing dramatically. The national government recommends LTC prevention through activation of communities. However, there is no clear evidence of the effect of population-based comprehensive geriatric intervention program (CGIP) for restraints of LTC users and the associated expenditures in the future. The aims of the current paper are to describe the study protocol and progress of a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a CGIP in Kameoka City.
Methods
The cluster RCT involved random allocation of regions as intervention (n=4,859) and nonintervention (n=7,195). Participants were elderly persons aged ≥65 years without LTC certification who had responded to a mailing survey. The residents living in intervention regions were invited to a physical check-up, and 1,463 people participated (30.3%). These individuals were invited to the CGIP, and 526 accepted. The CGIP comprised instructions on: 1) low-load resistance training using bodyweight, ankle weights, and elastic bands; 2) increasing daily physical activity; 3) oral motor exercise and care; and 4) a well-balanced diet based on a program from Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. We allocated the intervention regions randomly into home-based self-care program alone (HB group, 5 regions, n=275) and home-based program+weekly class-style session (CS group, 5 regions, n=251). We evaluated the effects of the CGIP at 12 weeks and at 12 or 15 months on physical function, and are conducting follow-up data collection for an indefinite period regarding LTC certification, medical costs, and mortality.
Results and discussion
The study was launched with good response rates in each phase. Participants of both groups significantly increased their step counts by ~1,000 per day from the baseline during the CGIP. This RCT will provide valuable information and evidence about effectiveness of a community-based CGIP.
Keywords: frailty, sarcopenia, long-term care, ActiveGuide, low-load resistance training, oral care, nutritional intervention, Shokuiku, physical function, physical activity monitor
Introduction
The Japanese Long-Term Care (LTC) Insurance System was launched in 2000, and revised in 2005 to implement care prevention measures.1 However, it is predicted that the country’s burden of LTC care prevention will increase 5%–6% per year in Japan because of increases in the population and in the age of older adults in Japan.2 Therefore, the Integrated Community Care System was introduced as the LTC system’s 2011 revision to restrain the cost of care prevention in LTC. In the system, local governments take some responsibility for providing a unique program to minimize the number of people certificated for LTC and to reduce the costs of providing LTC.2
The national government’s Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) recommends LTC prevention in the Integrated Community Care System through activation of communities in a multifaceted approach.3 MHLW recommends comprehensive geriatric interventions that comprise improvements in: 1) motor system function through exercise and physical activity; 2) oral function, through oral motor exercise and care; and 3) nutrition and diet, as well as problems associated with home boundness, such as social isolation, depression, and decreasing cognitive function.3 However, there is no clear evidence for population-based, comprehensive, longitudinal geriatric interventions to reduce burden on the LTC system in Japan.
There are potential resources in the form of experts and volunteers who are motivated to implement health promotion in communities; however, local governments are not in a position to manage them continuously. Therefore, there exists a need for a well-organized and long-term community-based management team for preventing the need for LTC use. Such a team should include exercise experts, dietitians, dental care experts, the local medical network, local government employees, and community-dwelling volunteers who can participate at the neighborhood level.3 The community-based comprehensive geriatric intervention program (CGIP) is required using these resources. Thus, we also established specified non-profit corporation, named Genki-up AGE Project, in Kameoka city and are continuously recruiting community-dwelling volunteers and training them as supporters of the program and neighborhood. This CGIP’s design allows for sustainable expansion of the program to a large population in the future.
The study protocol has been carefully planned with city government, researchers, and healthcare providers; hence, it is too complex to be described in the context of a single outcome-focused article. The aims of the current paper are to describe the study protocol and to report the recruiting progress for a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a CGIP in the community.
Methods
Study design, setting, and participants
The cluster RCT was conducted in Kameoka City, Kyoto Prefecture, Japan. The entire study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine (RBMR-E-371 and 372) and the National Institute of Health and Nutrition (NIHN187-3). This study is registered with the University hospital’s Medical Information Network Center – Clinical Trials Registration database (UMIN000008105).
Kameoka City is located in the central area of Kyoto Prefecture, about 25 km west of Kyoto City. The land area of the city is 224.90 km2. As of July 1, 2011, it had a population of 93,306, with 19,424 (20.8%) of individuals ≥65 years. The city government conducted a postal survey of “Needs in the Sphere of Daily Life (NSDL),” created by MHLW, with modifications by the engaged public health researchers, in July 29, 2011. The details of the NSDL have been described previously.4–6 The target population of the current cluster RCT is individuals of the 19,424 aged ≥65 years who did not have LTC certification (n=16,474, Figure 1).
We randomly selected 10 intervention regions from a total of 21 regions in Kameoka City (Cluster-RCT #1). On February 13, 2012, we sent postal invitations to the people living in the intervention regions who had responded to the NSDL survey to attend a physical check-up. The check-up was conducted at a community center in each intervention region so that participants could access it easily and in familiar surroundings. The physical check-up was conducted during March and April, and an additional examination was conducted in September 2012. The purpose, procedures, and risks of the physical check-up were explained to each participant. All participants provided written informed consent before undergoing the check-up.
We allocated the 10 intervention regions randomly into home-based self-care with or without weekly class-styled sessions. The program in all the regions included a daily log (see Supplementary materials) maintenance by participants and monthly communications (to be described later) from the research staff by mail. Half of the regions (home-based intervention [HB] group, five regions) received only this program; the other half (class-styled intervention [CS] group, five regions) received the additional component of a weekly class-style session at the community center (Cluster-RCT #2, Figures 2 and 3). After the physical check-up, we held the group meeting in each region to report the results of the check-up and to explain the CGIP for each region, so that the participants cannot select the program technically. Both the HB and CS interventions took place over 12 weeks, from May to August, or from September to December, according to class capacity and human resource availability. The baseline physical check-up examination was conducted in September for those who began the intervention in that month. The purpose, procedures, and risks of the intervention were explained to each participant. All participants provided written informed consent before entering the CGIP. After the 12-week intervention, their physical function was reevaluated in order to examine the short-term effect of intervention.
Participants were instructed to keep a daily log of their step counts, exercise, diet, and oral care, and to post these to the research office. The research staff and volunteers returned comments to participants about their logs, and also provided a new month’s supply of daily log sheets and monthly newsletter with geriatric health information. These monthly postal communications continued until the end of 2013.
The main purpose of this cluster RCT is to clarify the effect of the CGIP on LTC certification, LTC cost, survival time, health outcomes, and medical costs. The control group for this analysis will be selected from nonintervention regions (Cluster-RCT #1; 11 regions, n=7,195; Figures 1 and 2). People in nonintervention regions were not invited to the physical check-up and CGIP. Another main purpose is to investigate the long-term effect of the CGIP on physical function. In this case, the control group is those who do not intend to participate in the CGIP in intervention regions (Cluster-RCT #2; 10 regions; Figures 1 and 2). At the end of the follow-up period (October and November in 2013), we invited all participants in the physical check-up in 2012 for reexamination (Figure 2).
Comprehensive geriatric intervention program
The main intervention program was based on the participants’ daily logs and included instructions on: 1) very low-load resistance training with suitable modification of previous program for use with our participants7 (Table 1); 2) increasing daily physical activity and step count based on the Active-Guide by MHLW;8–11 3) oral motor exercise and care;12–15 and 4) self-monitoring a well-balanced diet based on the Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top by MHLW.16–19 Details of the CGIP are provided in Supplementary materials.
Table 1.
Exercises | Exercise movement | Load | Volume |
---|---|---|---|
Lower body | |||
Stepping exercise | As quickly as possible | Ankle weight | 10 s ×3–5 sets |
Single leg raise | Slow: 3-s concentric, 3-s eccentric, and 1-s isometric actions Quick: as quickly as possible |
Ankle weight | Slow: 6–10 reps ×1–2 sets Quick: 10 reps ×1 set |
Squat | Slow: 3-s concentric, 3-s eccentric, and 1-s isometric actions Quick: as quickly as possible |
Body weight | Slow: 6–10 reps ×1–2 sets Quick: 10 reps ×1 set |
Heel raise | Slow: 2-s concentric and 2-s eccentric actions Quick: as quickly as possible |
Body weight | Slow: 10–15 reps ×1–2 sets Quick: 15 reps ×1 set |
Upper body | |||
Arm curl | 4-s concentric and 4-s eccentric | Elastic band | 6–10 reps ×1–2 sets |
Front raise | 4-s concentric and 4-s eccentric | Elastic band | 6–10 reps ×1–2 sets |
Side raise | 4-s concentric and 4-s eccentric | Elastic band | 6–10 reps ×1–2 sets |
Shoulder external rotation | 4-s concentric and 4-s eccentric | Elastic band | 6–10 reps ×1–2 sets |
Abbreviation: rep, repetitions.
Outcomes
Physical activity
The total number of step counts per day was evaluated using a triaxial accelerometer.20–22 Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), defined as ≥3 metabolic equivalents (METs), was also obtained by the accelerometer. This measure has been validated and reported previously according to the Exercise and Physical Activity Guide for Health Promotion 2006 and 2013 established by MHLW.8–11 MVPA was obtained as “Exercise (Ex)” defined as METs h week−1.8–11 The accelerometers were distributed 1 week before the intervention, and all participants were asked to wear them throughout the intervention period, exclusive of time spent in water. Mean number of daily steps in the week before the intervention, in the last week of the intervention, and at the end of the follow-up period were compared. When there were no pre-intervention data, the daily steps in the first and/or second week of the intervention were substituted. The first and the last days of the intervention period and the days with step counts ≤300 were excluded from analysis. Participants who had at least four valid days were included in the analysis. These criteria followed a previous study.23 In accordance with the Exercise and Physical Activity Guide,8–11 we calculated the percentage of those with >10 Ex/week and >23 Ex/week.
Physical function
Physical function parameters were measured before and after the intervention, and at the end of the follow-up period. Main variables were the right front thigh muscle thickness, grip strength, maximum isometric right knee extension strength, usual and maximum walking velocity, the time from the timed up and go test, the five-time chair standing time, and vertical jump index (vertical jump height×body weight). Details of the measurements have been described previously.24–29
Other secondary variables
We also assessed with a Health and Nutrition survey with the following information after 12- or 15-months follow-up: 1) demographics (living arrangements, need for LTC, social network, and social support); 2) activities of daily living (International Physical Activity Questionnaire Environment module);30,31 3) general and mental health (height, weight, self-rated health, geriatric depression scale [GDS-15],32 and [WHO-5]);33 4) lifestyle profiles (smoking status, alcohol status, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index);34 5) oral health (General Oral Health Assessment Index);35,36 6) nutrition status (risk evaluation for eating and nutrition [SCREEN II]37 and Food Frequency Questionnaire).38–41 Furthermore, we measured total daily energy expenditure before and after intervention using the doubly labeled water methods42 for small subsamples.
LTC data and mortality
The collection of follow-up data will be conducted periodically for an indefinite period. We will follow five types of outcomes: LTC certification, LTC cost, survival time, health outcomes, and medical costs. The follow-up survey will be completed 2 years after the baseline. We are conducting this prospective cohort study with the cooperation of the Kameoka City municipal government, and using the residential registry of Kameoka City to follow the cohort participants for mortality and relocation out of the city.
Results
In cluster RCT #1, there were 6,696 elderly in the 10 intervention regions and 9,778 elderly in the 11 nonintervention regions who did not have LTC certification. Of these, 4,859 (72.6%) and 7,195 (73.6%) responded to the NSDL survey, respectively, and there was no difference in response rates. A total of 4,831 people in the intervention regions were invited for the physical check-up, and 1,463 (30.3%) participated. After receiving their check-up results and an explanation of the intervention program, 526 people expressed willingness to participate. Of these, 275 were allocated to the HB group and 251 to the CS group according to their region of residence. Once allocated, 263 people in the HB group and 238 in the CS group completed premeasures and two lectures (see Supplementary materials) and began the 12-week intervention.
Table 2 shows the baseline characteristics of the participants in each group. A significant interaction was observed in daily step counts by two-way analysis of variance (group×time). Mean number of daily steps was significantly increased from the baseline in both groups. The increase in daily steps in the CS group was significantly greater than that in the HB group (CS, 1,318.3 steps/day, HB, 701.1 steps/day; P=0.006).
Table 2.
Variables | CS (n=238) Mean±SD |
HB (n=263) Mean±SD |
P-value |
---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | 73.9±5.4 | 74.1±5.6 | 0.767 |
Number of women (%) | 138 (58.0) | 156 (59.3) | 0.762 |
Height (cm) | 156.2±8.6 | 156.4±8.3 | 0.733 |
Weight (kg) | 55.7±9.9 | 55.9±9.4 | 0.862 |
Body mass index (kg/m2) | 22.8±3.2 | 22.8±3.0 | 0.954 |
Daily step counts (steps/day) | 5,005.6±2,782.2 | 4,892.4±2,898.8 | 0.662 |
Front thigh muscle thickness (mm) | 41.6±6.5 | 42.5±6.5 | 0.138 |
Grip strength (kg) | 27.6±8.2 | 28.1±8.1 | 0.565 |
Maximum isometric knee extension strength (kg) | 28.0±11.0 | 29.6±11.2 | 0.101 |
Usual walking velocity (m/s) | 1.35±0.24 | 1.40±0.25 | 0.028 |
Maximum walking velocity (m/s) | 1.82±0.32 | 1.85±0.34 | 0.259 |
Time of timed up and go test (s) | 7.53±2.00 | 7.04±1.71 | 0.004 |
Five-time chair standing time (s) | 8.31±2.62 | 8.26±2.57 | 0.843 |
Vertical jump index (m×kg) | 12.1±5.2 | 12.3±5.4 | 0.713 |
Abbreviations: CS, class-styled; HB, home-based.
Discussion
We were able to launch the cluster RCT with a good response rate in each phase.
In the current intervention, participants increased their step count ~1,000 per day (+10 min) on average from the baseline and conducted daily-based self-care with daily log at the program. Miyachi et al conducted a meta-analysis and reported that an increment of 10 min of MVPA per day can result in a 3.2% reduction of the average relative risk of noncommunicable diseases, dementia, joint musculoskeletal impairment, and mortality. Therefore, we expect that this intervention can contribute to the health promotion of the participants in both groups.11 However, we have to remain neutral scientifically for the effect of current intervention before the data are analyzed and published.
This intervention program contains the factors that promote muscle hypertrophy. A previous study reported the muscle hypertrophic effect of a 12-week intervention with a slightly weighted (200~600 g) shoe,43 so we provided a single set of 500 g ankle weights to all participants in the present study. Previous studies reported that low-load (30%–60%, one repetition maximum) resistance training with slow movement (3-s concentric, 3-s eccentric and 1-s isometric actions) and sustained contractile force caused significant increases in muscle size and strength in untrained young men and robust elderly participants.44–46 The slow movement protocol was applied to resistance training program of the intervention. Although low-load resistance training with slow movement and sustained contractile force is effective for increasing muscle size, this protocol has an unfavorable effect on dynamic sports movements.47 Thus, this type of resistance training might be ineffective for improving motor functions in activities of daily life, such as walking and climbing stairs, for older individuals. In the present study, a stepping exercise that required stepping as quickly as possible for 10 s was included to improve physical function. Also, all participants were instructed to perform a single set (10–15 repetitions) of the three exercises (single leg raise, squat, and cuff raise) as quickly as possible after fifth week of the 12-week intervention period in order to improve total physical function. In addition to MVPA and resistance exercise, oral care and nutritional factor were included in the current intervention program. Approaches to oral function and nutrition may additionally contribute to muscle hypertrophy and improvement of physical function.
As MHLW recommended, our intervention program is comprehensive. It consisted of increasing physical activity, practical resistance training, oral care, and nutritional lecture. Each factor is important for health promotion of older population. We believe that our CGIP is feasible for older people. This study is an attempt to verify whether the CGIP can be used as a large population approach to community-dwelling elderly for health promotion. On the other hand and also the limitation of this study, we cannot evaluate the contribution of individual factor included in the program, because this study was designed to investigate the effect of the comprehensive program.
Conclusion
We successfully launched a cluster RCT with good response rates in each phase. This is the first report about our CGIP in Kyoto-Kameoka Study. Participants increased their step count by ~1,000 per day (+10 min) in the program. This RCT will provide valuable information and evidence about a comprehensive, community-based geriatric intervention program. Supplementary materials will be freely available for developing community-based CGIP.
Supplementary materials
Details on the comprehensive geriatric intervention program
Exercise and physical activity
A triaxial accelerometer/pedometer (EW-NK52; Panasonic Electric Works, Tokyo, Japan), a single set of 500 g ankle weights (STW140; Sinwa Enterprise, Osaka, Japan), and an elastic band (Thera-Band, Hygenic Co., Akron, OH, USA) were provided free of charge as exercise materials to all participants. The total cost of these materials was about ≥30 per person. Three different resistance levels of elastic band (Yellow<Red<Green) were offered, and the participants selected one at their discretion.
The low-load resistance training program consisted of eight exercises (stepping, squats, single leg raises, heel raises, arm curls, front raises, side raises, and shoulder external rotations). Details of the exercises are shown in Table 1. All exercises for the lower limbs were performed using bodyweight as the load. An ankle weight was used as an additional load for stepping exercises and single leg raises. All exercises for the upper limbs were performed using an elastic band as the load. A slow movement method1,2 was employed, with muscle contractions held for 7–8 s per repetition, for all exercises except stepping. After 5 weeks, a single set (10–15 reps) of three exercises (single leg raises without ankle weight, squats, and heel raises), which were performed as quickly as possible, were added to the resistance training program.
The daily step count was measured before the intervention, and the participants were instructed to increase their number of daily steps progressively. We recommended that steps be increased by up to 2,500 per day from the baseline, but at an individually comfortable rate of increasing steps. We instructed participants who already had daily step counts of 10,000 or more to maintain their physical activity. We also mentioned if participants could and wanted to impose an additional load in daily life, walking while wearing ankle weights was a good exercise. The ActiveGuide by MHLW recommends “+10” that is “add 10 min of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) per day” (Figure S1).3–5 In addition, the ActiveGuide recommends 40 min of any level of physical activity, including low-intensity physical activity, for the geriatric population aged ≥65 years. The “+10” equates to nearly 1,000 steps and the triaxial accelerometer can measure “Exercise (Ex)” (metabolic equivalents [METs]×h) and total energy expenditure including low and moderate-to-vigorous levels.
Oral function
At first week of the intervention period, the participants took part in a lecture by a professional dental hygienist, and then were instructed to perform 5 min of oral motor exercise and oral care using a toothbrush. The oral motor exercise program was supervised by the Kyoto Dental Hygienists’ Association. Figure S2 shows one of the leaflets from the oral motor exercise that was distributed to all participants.
Nutrition and diet
In Japan, MHLW and the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries jointly developed the Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top in 2005 (Figure S3).6–9 This guide attempts to illustrate the balance and quantity of food in the recommended daily Japanese diet. The food guide prescribes the daily base of balanced intake of grains, vegetables, fish and meat, milk, and fruits. At second week of the intervention period, the participants took part in a lecture from a registered dietitian. To improve their nutritional status and physical function, and to prevent sarcopenia, frailty, and long-term care certification, we recommended grain dishes, vegetable dishes, and fish or meat dishes three times per day (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) and milk or milk products and fruits at least one time per day. The participants were instructed to check their diet habit on a daily log. We provided commercially available brochures and leaflets of educational material on nutrition and diet based on the Japanese Food Guide recommendations.
Weekly class-style program
The CS group attended 90 min weekly class-style sessions at a community center in each intervention region in addition to the previously mentioned home-based self-care. The weekly class-style session contained three to seven low-impact dance exercises (maximum of 35 min; 3–5 min for each exercise), oral motor exercise (5 min), and resistance exercise (~40 min). The HB group did not participate in any class-style sessions. Optional lectures and counseling were held in 5th to 6th weeks of the 12-week intervention period for the HB group to answer any questions they had. Otherwise, the participants in the HB group carried out the intervention program independently at home.
Physical activity, exercise, oral care, and diet log
The daily self-care log was provided to all participants (Figure S4). All participants were instructed to record their daily step counts, the resistance exercise, and oral motor exercise status (did or did not perform), and nutrition status as part of the log. In the CS group, we wrote comments to the logs at the weekly class-style sessions. We also collected the logs and checked them each month. In the HB group, the participants sent their logs to our laboratory each month via postal mail, and the logs were returned after we had checked them and written comments in response to the entries. We continued sending and collecting the logs, and replying with comments until the end of 2013 (for 12- or 15-months), after the 12-week intervention program had concluded.
References
- 1.Watanabe Y, Tanimoto M, Oba N, Sanada K, Miyachi M, Ishii N. Effect of resistance training using bodyweight in the elderly: comparison of resistance exercise movement between slow and normal speed movement. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015;15(12):1270–1277. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Watanabe Y, Tanimoto M, Ohgane A, Sanada K, Miyachi M, Ishii N. Increased muscle size and strength from slow-movement, low-intensity resistance exercise and tonic force generation. J Aging Phys Act. 2013;21(1):71–84. doi: 10.1123/japa.21.1.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Murakami H, Tripette J, Kawakami R, Miyachi M. “Add 10 min for your health”: the new Japanese recommendation for physical activity based on dose-response analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(11):1153–1154. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.10.080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Miyachi M, Tripette J, Kawakami R, Murakami H. “+10 min of physical activity per day”: Japan is looking for efficient but feasible recommendations for its population. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol. 2015;61(Suppl):S7–S9. doi: 10.3177/jnsv.61.S7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Physical Activity References for Health Promotion. 2013. [Accessed April 25, 2018]. Available from: http://www.nibiohn.go.jp/eiken/info/pdf/active2013-e.pdf.
- 6.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top. 2005. [Accessed April 25, 2018]. Available from: http://www.maff.go.jp/j/balance_guide/b_use/pdf/eng_reiari.pdf.
- 7.Yoshiike N, Hayashi F, Takemi Y, Mizoguchi K, Seino F. A new food guide in Japan: the Japanese food guide Spinning Top. Nutr Rev. 2007;65(4):149–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2007.tb00294.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Oba S, Nagata C, Nakamura K, et al. Diet based on the Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top and subsequent mortality among men and women in a general Japanese population. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109(9):1540–1547. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.06.367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kurotani K, Akter S, Kashino I, et al. Quality of diet and mortality among Japanese men and women: Japan Public Health Center based prospective study. BMJ. 2016;352:i1209. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Acknowledgments
The authors thank all the participants in this study as well as Kameoka City, The Promotion Organization of Integrated Community Care System of Kyoto Prefecture, Kyoto Dental Hygienists’ Association, Kyoto Dietetic Association, Kameoka City municipal government, and all staff of the Kameoka-Study Group. We especially thank Dr Motoko Miyake, Kyoto Gakuen University; Prof Taeko Masumoto and Prof Yasuko Okayama, Doshisha Women’s College of Liberal Arts; Ms Miho Nishimura and Mr Hajime Tamiya, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine; Prof Tomoki Nakaya, Ritsumeikan University; Dr Minoru Yamada, Tsukuba University; Prof Hidenori Arai, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology; Dr Mitsuyoshi Yoshida, Hiroshima University; Prof Takeshi Kikutani, Nippon Dental University; Dr Hinako Nanri, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition; Dr Hiroyuki Sagayama, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Dr Date Heiwa, Shiga University; Mr Masahiro Fukuda, Ms Kazuko Ohkura, Ms Haruka Nishioka, and Ms Sairi Watanabe for their dedicated efforts. This work was supported by MEXT KAKENHI research grants from JSPS (Grant Numbers 24240091 [to MK], 25750360 and 15K16531 [to YW], 23-333 and 15H05363 [to YY]) and by a grant from the Promotion Organization of Integrated Community Care System of Kyoto Prefecture and a grant from the Kameoka City municipal government.
Footnotes
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
- 1.Campbell JC, Ikegami N. Long-term care insurance comes to Japan. Health Aff (Millwood) 2000;19(3):26–39. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.19.3.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Health and Welfare Bureau for the Elderly, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Long-Term Care Insurance System of Japan. 2016. [Accessed April 25, 2018]. Available from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/policy/care-welfare/care-welfare-elderly/dl/ltcisj_e.pdf.
- 3.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Manual for Prevention of Long-Term Care in Elderly (Revised) 2012 Japanese. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yamada Y, Nanri H, Watanabe Y, et al. Prevalence of frailty assessed by Fried and Kihon checklist indices in a prospective cohort study: design and demographics of the Kyoto-Kameoka longitudinal study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017;18:733.e7–733.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yamagata E, Kimura M, Miyake M, et al. Relationship between homebound status and physical fitness in the community-dwelling elderly population. [Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Jpn J Public Health. 2014;61(11):671–678. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Masumoto T, Yamada Y, Yamada M, et al. Fall risk factors and sex differences among community-dwelling elderly individuals in Japan. A Kameoka study. [Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Jpn J Public Health. 2015;62(8):390–401. doi: 10.11236/jph.62.8_390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Watanabe Y, Tanimoto M, Oba N, Sanada K, Miyachi M, Ishii N. Effect of resistance training using bodyweight in the elderly: comparison of resistance exercise movement between slow and normal speed movement. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015;15(12):1270–1277. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare . Exercise and Physical Activity Reference for Health Promotion 2006, Report in Japanese. 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare . Physical Activity References for Health Promotion 2013, Report in Japanese. 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Murakami H, Tripette J, Kawakami R, Miyachi M. “Add 10 min for your health”: the new Japanese recommendation for physical activity based on dose-response analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(11):1153–1154. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.10.080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Miyachi M, Tripette J, Kawakami R, Murakami H. “+10 min of physical activity per day”: Japan is looking for efficient but feasible recommendations for its population. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol. 2015;61(Suppl):S7–S9. doi: 10.3177/jnsv.61.S7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Watanabe Y, Hirano H, Arai H, et al. Relationship between frailty and oral function in community-dwelling elderly adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017;65(1):66–76. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tamura F, Kikutani T, Tohara T, Yoshida M, Yaegaki K. Tongue thickness relates to nutritional status in the elderly. Dysphagia. 2012;27(4):556–561. doi: 10.1007/s00455-012-9407-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sagawa K, Kikutani T, Tamura F, Yoshida M. Factors related to skeletal muscle mass in the frail elderly. Odontology. 2017;105(1):91–95. doi: 10.1007/s10266-015-0231-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kikutani T, Yoneyama T, Nishiwaki K, Tamura F, Yoshida M, Sasaki H. Effect of oral care on cognitive function in patients with dementia. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2010;10(4):327–328. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2010.00637.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top. 2005. [Accessed April 25, 2018]. Available from: http://www.maff.go.jp/j/balance_guide/b_use/pdf/eng_reiari.pdf.
- 17.Yoshiike N, Hayashi F, Takemi Y, Mizoguchi K, Seino F. A new food guide in Japan: the Japanese food guide Spinning Top. Nutr Rev. 2007;65(4):149–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2007.tb00294.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Oba S, Nagata C, Nakamura K, et al. Diet based on the Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top and subsequent mortality among men and women in a general Japanese population. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109(9):1540–1547. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.06.367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kurotani K, Akter S, Kashino I, et al. Quality of diet and mortality among Japanese men and women: Japan Public Health Center based prospective study. BMJ. 2016;352:i1209. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yamada Y, Yokoyama K, Noriyasu R, et al. Light-intensity activities are important for estimating physical activity energy expenditure using uniaxial and triaxial accelerometers. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009;105(1):141–152. doi: 10.1007/s00421-008-0883-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yamada Y, Yokoyama K, Noriyasu R, et al. Erratum to: Calculation of total energy expenditure in publications on physical activity energy by Yamada et al. in 2009 and 2013. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016;116(6):1279–1280. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3376-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Murakami H, Kawakami R, Nakae S, et al. Accuracy of wearable devices for estimating total energy expenditure: comparison with metabolic chamber and doubly labeled water method. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(5):702–703. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ikenaga M, Yamada Y, Takeda N, et al. Dynapenia, gait speed and daily physical activity measured using triaxial accelerometer in older Japanese men. Jpn J Phys Fitness Sports Med. 2014;3:147–154. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kimura M, Mizuta C, Yamada Y, Okayama Y, Nakamura E. Constructing an index of physical fitness age for Japanese elderly based on 7-year longitudinal data: sex differences in estimated physical fitness age. Age (Dordr) 2012;34(1):203–214. doi: 10.1007/s11357-011-9225-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yamada Y, Yoshida T, Yokoyama K, et al. The extracellular to intracellular water ratio in upper legs is negatively associated with skeletal muscle strength and gait speed in older people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017;72(3):293–298. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glw125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yamada Y, Watanabe Y, Ikenaga M, et al. Comparison of single- or multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis and spectroscopy for assessment of appendicular skeletal muscle in the elderly. J Appl Physiol. 2013;115(6):812–818. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00010.2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yamada Y, Schoeller DA, Nakamura E, Morimoto T, Kimura M, Oda S. Extracellular water may mask actual muscle atrophy during aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010;65A(5):510–516. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glq001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Watanabe Y, Yamada Y, Fukumoto Y, et al. Echo intensity obtained from ultrasonography images reflecting muscle strength in elderly men. Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:993–998. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S47263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yoshida T, Kimura M, Watanabe Y, et al. Differences in frailty prevalence between evaluating methods in 1,379 community-dwelling older adults–Kyoto-Kameoka Study. Jpn J Health Promot. 2017;19(1):9–18. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381–1395. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rosenberg DE, Bull FC, Marshall AL, Sallis JF, Bauman AE. Assessment of sedentary behavior with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. J Phys Act Health. 2008;5(Suppl 1):S30–S44. doi: 10.1123/jpah.5.s1.s30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schreiner AS, Hayakawa H, Morimoto T, Kakuma T. Screening for late life depression: cut-off scores for the Geriatric Depression scale and the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia among Japanese subjects. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003;18(6):498–505. doi: 10.1002/gps.880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Awata S, Bech P, Koizumi Y, et al. Validity and utility of the Japanese version of the WHO-Five Well-Being Index in the context of detecting suicidal ideation in elderly community residents. Int Psychogeriatr. 2007;19(1):77–88. doi: 10.1017/S1041610206004212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989;28(2):193–213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Atchison KA, Dolan TA. Development of the geriatric oral health assessment index. J Dent Educ. 1990;54(11):680–687. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Naito M, Yuasa H, Nomura Y, Nakayama T, Hamajima N, Hanada N. Oral health status and health-related quality of life: a systematic review. J Oral Sci. 2006;48(1):1–7. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.48.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Keller HH, Goy R, Kane SL. Validity and reliability of SCREEN II (Seniors in the community: risk evaluation for eating and nutrition, Version II) Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005;59(10):1149–1157. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Goto C, Tokudome Y, Imaeda N, et al. Validation study of fatty acid consumption assessed with a short food frequency questionnaire against plasma concentration in middle-aged Japanese people. Scand J Nutr. 2006;50(2):77–82. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Imaeda N, Goto C, Tokudome Y, Hirose K, Tajima K, Tokudome S. Reproducibility of a short food frequency questionnaire for Japanese general population. J Epidemiol. 2007;17(3):100–107. doi: 10.2188/jea.17.100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tokudome S, Goto C, Imaeda N, Tokudome Y, Ikeda M, Maki S. Development of a data-based short food frequency questionnaire for assessing nutrient intake by middle-aged Japanese. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2004;5(1):40–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tokudome Y, Goto C, Imaeda N, et al. Relative validity of a short food frequency questionnaire for assessing nutrient intake versus three-day weighed diet records in middle-aged Japanese. J Epidemiol. 2005;15(4):135–145. doi: 10.2188/jea.15.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Schoeller DA, Ravussin E, Schutz Y, Acheson KJ, Baertschi P, Jequier E. Energy expenditure by doubly labeled water: validation in humans and proposed calculation. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 1986;250(5):R823–R830. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1986.250.5.R823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ikenaga M, Yamada Y, Mihara R, et al. Effects of slightly-weighted shoe intervention on lower limb muscle mass and gait patterns in the elderly. Jpn J Phys Fitness Sports Med. 2012;61(5):469–477. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Watanabe Y, Tanimoto M, Ohgane A, Sanada K, Miyachi M, Ishii N. Increased muscle size and strength from slow-movement, low-intensity resistance exercise and tonic force generation. J Aging Phys Act. 2013;21(1):71–84. doi: 10.1123/japa.21.1.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Watanabe Y, Madarame H, Ogasawara R, Nakazato K, Ishii N. Effect of very low-intensity resistance training with slow movement on muscle size and strength in healthy older adults. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2014;34(6):463–470. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tanimoto M, Ishii N. Effects of low-intensity resistance exercise with slow movement and tonic force generation on muscular function in young men. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2006;100(4):1150–1157. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00741.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tanimoto M, Arakawa H, Sanada K, Miyachi M, Ishii N. Changes in muscle activation and force generation patterns during cycling movements because of low-intensity squat training with slow movement and tonic force generation. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(8):2367–2376. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b8d246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.