Abstract
Access to 211At and 125I-radiolabeled compounds in excellent RCCs and RCYs was achieved in just 10 minutes at room temperature using a Cu catalyst. Reaction conditions are applicable to a broad class of aryl and heteroaryl boronic reagents with varying steric and electronic properties, as well as late-stage astatination and iodination of anticancer PARP inhibitors. This protocol eliminates the traditional need for toxic organotin reagents, elevated temperatures, and extended reaction times, providing a more practical and environmentally friendly approach to developing alpha-emitting radiotherapeutics.
Graphical Abstract
Radiohalides are powerful imaging, diagnostic, and therapeutic tools with vast applications in nuclear medicine.1 Of such, the α-emitting radionuclide 211At provides an attractive approach to developing cancer therapeutics by delivering high-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation that, on the atomic level, is more efficient at causing DNA damage than β−-emitters.2 While this radiation dose is highly cytotoxic to the targeted cancer cell, the surrounding healthy tissue is spared due to the 50–70 μm path-length of the alpha-particle.3 Compared to other α-emitting nuclides such as 212Bi (t1/2 = 1 h), 213Bi (t1/2 = 46 min), and 226Th (t1/2 = 30 min), 211At (t1/2 = 7.2 h) displays a half-life that is economically viable for radiochemistry, quality control, and transportation, which allows the radionuclide to target less accessible tumor cells in living systems.4 The 7.2 h half-life of 211At is better suited with fast targeting vectors that are retained in tumors such as small molecules. Although many groups have explored astatinated peptides and antibodies, a recent study has demonstrated oxidative lysosomal degradation of these targeting agents results in dehalogenation in vivo.5 While 225Ac (t1/2 = 10 d), 223Ra (t1/2 = 11.4 d), and 227Th (t1/2 = 18.7 d) illustrate more favorable half-lives for antibodies, these α-emitters require ligand chelation in order to form stable chemical complexes that often escape the respective radiobio-conjugate. These radionuclides also emit unwanted decay products and are ineffective after a single alpha-decay, resulting in toxic daughter isotopes, which can distribute throughout the body.4 Despite the clear advantages 211At offers, synthetic methodologies that can provide access to astatinated compounds are exceedingly rare, mainly due to At having no stable isotopes, the scarcity of radio-isotope production sites capable of making 211At, and lack of understanding the chemical behavior of the element.6 An efficient late-stage astatination strategy would provide a much-needed platform for developing 211At-based α-emitting therapeutics.
Traditional routes to astatinated compounds proceed through electrophilic destannylation of an organotin functional group allowing for rapid incorporation of 211At (Scheme 1a).1, 7, 8 However, handling of toxic alkyltin reagents is required to develop the aryl stannane precursors, and only modest yields of the 211At-radiolabeled products are achieved. This is attributed to the multiple oxidation states astatine can adopt, therefore, making it difficult to obtain the desired, and non-stable, At+1 species for electrophilic substitution.9, 10 In 2016, Brechbiel and co-workers illustrated the use of aryl iodonium salts to access astatinated aryl compounds through an SNAr mechanistic pathway (Scheme 1b).11 This detailed report also demonstrated how regioselectivity was driven by electronic effects, as 211At-product formation proceeded with high selectivity for the aryl ring containing the most electron-withdrawing substituent in the para-position. Despite the high yields obtained using this method, astantination of the conjugate aryl group results in unwanted side-product formation.
Scheme 1.
Synthetic routes to 211At-labeled compounds
Due to previous reports illustrating the versatility of the Chan–Evans–Lam reaction12–14 to access radio-iodinated and -fluorinated compounds via boronic reagents,15–22 we adapted a similar strategy to access 211At-labeled hetero(aryl) synthons. This study will complement these previous studies, as well as the Cu-assisted halogenation reports illustrated by Sanford and Scott, 23, 24, 25 demonstrating facile access to versatile α-emitting synthetic building blocks.
In 2016, Zhang and co-workers outlined a Cu/ligand-catalyzed radioiodination methodology using boronic acid precursors, achieving good radiochemical conversions (RCCs) in one hour at room temp.22 Therefore, we began our initial investigation by screening several Cu-sources in order to identify an efficient catalyst for 125I-radiolabling aryl boronic esters that could be translated to astatination. Using Cu(pyridine)4OTf complex, we were able to obtain excellent RCCs of 2 (Table 1, entry 5) in just 10 minutes at room temp with no ligand additives. Analogous boryl reagents of 1, (entries 9–11), were also compatible with the outlined 125I-radiolabeling protocol. We then investigated 4-methoxyphenylboronic N-methyliminodiacetic acid (MIDA) ester (entry 12), a pyramidalized class of boryl reagents, however, low RCC values were obtained (entry 12).
Table 1.
Optimization of 125I-Radiolabling of 4-Methoxyphenyl Boryl Reagentsa
![]() | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
entry | R | Cu source | mol % | RCCb (%) |
1 | Bpin | none | 0 | NC c |
2 | Bpin | Cu2O | 5 | NC c |
3 | Bpin | Cu(CO2CH3)2 | 5 | 7 ± 1 |
4 | Bpin | Cu(OCOCF3)2·H2O | 5 | 50 ± 1 |
5 | Bpin | Cu(CH3CN)4OTf | 5 | 91 ± 2 |
6 | Bpin | Cu(pyridine)4(OTf)2 | 5 | 95 ± 1 |
7 | Bpin | Cu(pyridine)4(OTf)2 | 1 | 80 ± 8 |
8 | noned | Cu(pyridine)4(OTf)2 | 5 | NC c |
9 | B(OH)2 | Cu(pyridine)4(OTf)2 | 5 | 99 ± 1 |
10 | BF3K | Cu(pyridine)4(OTf)2 | 5 | 89 ± 4 |
11 | Bnepe | Cu(pyridine)4(OTf)2 | 5 | 99 ± 1 |
12 | MIDAf | Cu(pyridine)4(OTf)2 | 5 | 47 ± 14 |
Standard conditions: 1 (15 μmol), Cu source (0.75 μmol), Na[125I] solution (3–6 MBq) in 150 μL of MeOH:ACN (4:1).
RCC determined by radio-HPLC (average of n = ≥ 2 runs). Identity of the product was determined by HPLC using 4-iodoanisole as the reference standard.
NC = No Conversion.
No substrate was used.
Bnep = boronic acid neopentylglycol ester.
MIDA = N-methyliminodiacetic acid.
Optimized conditions were then applied to radiodination and astatination of aryl boronic esters with varying functional groups (Scheme 2). The HPLC chromatogram of each respective non-radioactive 127I standard was used to identify both the 125I- and 211At-labelled products due to the near identical retention times of the radiolabeled congeners resulting from the chemical similarities of iodine and astatine (see Supporting Information).
Scheme 2. Scope of 125I- and 211At-Radiolabeling of Boronic Estersa.
aStandard conditions: 1 (15 μmol), Cu(pyridine)4(OTf)2 (0.75 μmol), Na[125I] or Na[211At] solution (3–6 MBq) in 150 μL of MeOH:ACN (4:1). RCC for 125I- and 211At-labeled compounds were each determined by radio-TLC (n = 3). bRCC for 125I- and 211At-labeled compounds were each determined by radio-HPLC (n = 3).
We found reaction conditions to be well tolerant of both electron-rich and -poor substrates, 3a–c, including sterically crowded substrates 3b–c, which have been reported to slow down the transmetallation step in Cu-catalyzed radiolabeling protocols.17, 21, 22 Excellent 125I and 211At RCCs were also obtained with morpholine and piperazine substrates, 3i–j, prevalent nitrogen heterocycles found in many bioactive compounds and FDA-approved drugs.26 Quantitative 125I and 211At RCC was observed with 3k, providing access to 125I and 211At-labelled benzoate N-hydroxysuccinimide esters, compounds commonly employed in radiolabeling proteins.1, 27, 28 Good RCCs continued with nitrogen and sulfur heterocyles, including 5-membered ring systems as well (4l–p).
We next examined the efficiency of the method to radiolabel molecules with 125I and 211At that have potential clinical applications (Scheme 3). Thus, we applied this radiolabeling approach to Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), effective cancer therapeutics for patients with BRCA mutations,29 a current research focus in our laboratory. However, using the optimized conditions with PARPi precursors 5a–b, we only achieved RCYs of 61% and 69%, respectively. When utilizing a 1:1 ratio of Cu(pyridine)4(OTf)2 and electron-rich ligand 3,4,7,8-tetramethyl-1,10-phenanthroline, we obtained excellent RCCs and RCYs of 6a–b.
Scheme 3. Access to 125I- and 211At-PARP-1 Inhibitor Compounds via Boronic Ester Precursor 5a–ba.
aStandard conditions: 1 (15 μmol), Cu(pyridine)4(OTf)2 (0.75 μmol), 3,4,7,8-tetramethyl-1,10-phenanthroline (0.75 μmol), Na[125I] or Na[211At] solution (3–6 MBq) in 150 μL of MeOH:ACN (4:1). RCC and RCY for 125I- and 211At-labeled compounds were each determined by radio-HPLC (n = 3).
The RCYs of 6b obtained using our catalytic approach rival those in previous reports, outlined in Figure 1, which require reaction temperatures of 100 °C or greater,30, 31 or 2 to 4 hour reaction times.32, 33 Although the astatinated analogue of 6b has been disclosed by Reiner and co-workers34 (no RCY reported), they reported a three-hour synthetic procedure with 211At, an unusual approach considering the 7.2 hour half-life of the radionuclide.
Figure 1.
Current synthetic radiolabeling routes of 6b
Finally, we prepared 5c to access our previously reported [125I]KX135 and [211At]MM4 using our Cu/ligand protocol (Scheme 4). Compared to tin-precursor 5c′, we were able to obtain greater RCCs and RCYs using 5c with 125I and 211At, at much milder reaction conditions.
Scheme 4. Access to 125I- and 211At-PARP-1 Inhibitor Compounds via Boronic Ester Precursor 5ca.
aStandard conditions: 1 (15 μmol), Cu(pyridine)4(OTf)2 (0.75 μmol), 3,4,7,8-tetramethyl-1,10-phenanthroline (0.75 μmol), Na[125I] or Na[211At] solution (3–6 MBq) in 150 μL of MeOH:ACN (4:1). RCC and RCY for 125I- and 211At-labeled compounds were each determined by radio-HPLC (n = 3).
We have demonstrated the first approach to astatinated compounds using boronic ester precursors, providing an efficient and non-toxic protocol that eliminates the traditional need for toxic organotin reagents. This divergent synthesis delivers exceptional radionuclide incorporation for 125I and 211At at room temperature, and is applicable to simple and complex boronic ester precursors, allowing for late-stage radiolabeling with heavy halides. This platform can be applied to other diverse and biologically relevant precursors, allowing for a more practical approach in developing α-emitting therapeutics.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The Department of Energy is gratefully acknowledged for financial support (Grant DE-SC0017250646 to RHM). SWR conducted this research through the support of training grant 5T32DA028874-07.
Footnotes
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website.
General methods and radiolabeling protocol, synthesis, characterization, 1H and 13C Spectrum of boronic ester precursors and 127I Standards, and UV-HPLC and radio-HPLC chromatograms. (PDF)
References
- 1.Adam MJ, Wilbur DS. Chem Soc Rev. 2005;34:153. doi: 10.1039/b313872k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Elgqvist J, Frost S, Pouget J-P, Albertsson P. Front Oncol. 2014;3 doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Aneheim E, Albertsson P, Bäck T, Jensen H, Palm S, Lindegren S. 2015;5:12025. doi: 10.1038/srep12025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dziawer L, Kozminski P, Meczynska-Wielgosz S, Pruszynski M, Lyczko M, Was B, Celichowski G, Grobelny J, Jastrzebski J, Bilewicz A. RSC Adv. 2017;7:41024. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Teze D, Sergentu DC, Kalichuk V, Barbet J, Deniaud D, Galland N, Maurice R, Montavon G. Sci Rep. 2017;7:2579. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02614-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wilbur DS. Nat Chem. 2013;5:246. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rajerison H, Faye D, Roumesy A, Louaisil N, Boeda F, Faivre-Chauvet A, Gestin JF, Legoupy S. Org Biomol Chem. 2016;14:2121. doi: 10.1039/c5ob02459e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Aneheim E, Gustafsson A, Albertsson P, Bäck T, Jensen H, Palm S, Svedhem S, Lindegren S. Bioconjugate Chem. 2016;27:688. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Visser Gerard WM. Inorganic Astatine Chemistry. Radiochimica Acta. 1989;47:97. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pozzi OR, Zalutsky MR. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1190. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.106.038505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Guérard F, Lee YS, Baidoo K, Gestin JF, Brechbiel MW. Chem Eur J. 2016;22:12332. doi: 10.1002/chem.201600922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chan DMT, Monaco KL, Wang RP, Winters MP. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998;39:2933. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Evans DA, Katz JL, West TR. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998;39:2937. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lam PYS, Clark CG, Saubern S, Adams J, Winters MP, Chan DMT, Combs A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998;39:2941. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Taylor NJ, Emer E, Preshlock S, Schedler M, Tredwell M, Verhoog S, Mercier J, Genicot C, Gouverneur V. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139:8267. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b03131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Preshlock S, Tredwell M, Gouverneur V. Chem Rev. 2016;116:719. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wilson TC, McSweeney G, Preshlock S, Verhoog S, Tredwell M, Cailly T, Gouverneur V. Chem Commun. 2016;52:13277. doi: 10.1039/c6cc07417k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tredwell M, Preshlock SM, Taylor NJ, Gruber S, Huiban M, Passchier J, Mercier J, Génicot C, Gouverneur V. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2014;53:7751. doi: 10.1002/anie.201404436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Stenhagen ISR, Kirjavainen AK, Forsback SJ, Jorgensen CG, Robins EG, Luthra SK, Solin O, Gouverneur V. Chem Commun. 2013;49:1386. doi: 10.1039/c2cc38646a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Brooks AF, Topczewski JJ, Ichiishi N, Sanford MS, Scott PJ. Chem Sci. 2014;5:4545. doi: 10.1039/C4SC02099E. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mossine AV, Brooks AF, Makaravage KJ, Miller JM, Ichiishi N, Sanford MS, Scott PJH. Org Lett. 2015;17:5780. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b02875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang P, Zhuang R, Guo Z, Su X, Chen X, Zhang X. Chem Eur J. 2016;22:16783. doi: 10.1002/chem.201604105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ichiishi N, Canty AJ, Yates BF, Sanford MS. Org Lett. 2013;15:5134. doi: 10.1021/ol4025716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Makaravage KJ, Brooks AF, Mossine AV, Sanford MS, Scott PJH. Org Lett. 2016;18:5440. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b02911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ichiishi N, Brooks AF, Topczewski JJ, Rodnick ME, Sanford MS, Scott PJH. Org Lett. 2014;16:3224. doi: 10.1021/ol501243g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vitaku E, Smith DT, Njardarson JT. J Med Chem. 2014;57:10257. doi: 10.1021/jm501100b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wilbur DS, Hadley SW, Hylarides MD, Abrams PG, Beaumier PA, Morgan AC, Reno JM, Fritzberg AR. J Nucl Med. 1989;30:216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Guérard F, Navarro L, Lee YS, Roumesy A, Alliot C, Chérel M, Brechbiel MW, Gestin JF. Bioorg Med Chem. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2017.09.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wang YQ, Wang PY, Wang YT, Yang GF, Zhang A, Miao ZH. J Med Chem. 2016;59:9575. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zmuda F, Malviya G, Blair A, Boyd M, Chalmers AJ, Sutherland A, Pimlott SL. J Med Chem. 2015;58:8683. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Webster S, O’Rourke KM, Fletcher C, Pimlott SL, Sutherland A, Lee AL. Chem Eur J. 2018;24:937. doi: 10.1002/chem.201704534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Salinas B, Irwin CP, Kossatz S, Bolaender A, Chiosis G, Pillarsetty N, Weber WA, Reiner T. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;5:123. doi: 10.1186/s13550-015-0123-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sloan NL, Luthra SK, McRobbie G, Pimlott SL, Sutherland A. Chem Commun. 2017;53:11008. doi: 10.1039/c7cc06211g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Reiner T, Lewis JS, Weber W, Rodriguez BS, Carney B, Carlucci G. WO2016033293A1. 2016
- 35.Makvandi M, Xu K, Lieberman BP, Anderson RC, Effron SS, Winters HD, Zeng C, McDonald ES, Pryma DA, Greenberg RA, Mach RH. Cancer Res. 2016;76:4516. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.