Skip to main content
Infection Ecology & Epidemiology logoLink to Infection Ecology & Epidemiology
. 2018 May 28;8(1):1478585. doi: 10.1080/20008686.2018.1478585

Viral metagenomics reveals the presence of highly divergent quaranjavirus in Rhipicephalus ticks from Mozambique

Harindranath Cholleti a,, Juliette Hayer b, Fernando Chanisso Mulandane c, Kerstin Falk d, Jose Fafetine c, Mikael Berg a, Anne-Lie Blomström a
PMCID: PMC5974704  PMID: 29868166

ABSTRACT

Background: Ticks are primary vectors for many well-known disease-causing agents that affect human and animal populations globally such as tick-borne encephalitis, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever and African swine fever. In this study, viral metagenomics was used to identify what viruses are present in Rhipicephalus spp. ticks collected in the Zambezi Valley of Mozambique.

Methods: The RNA was amplified with sequence-independent single primer amplification (SISPA) and high-throughput sequencing was performed on the Ion Torrent platform. The generated sequences were subjected to quality check and classfied by BLAST. CodonCode aligner and SeqMan were used to assemble the sequences.

Results: The majority of viral sequences showed closest sequence identity to the Orthomyxoviridae family, although viruses similar to the Parvoviridae and Coronaviridae were also identified. Nearly complete sequences of five orthomyxoviral segments (HA, NP, PB1, PB2, and PA) were obtained and these showed an amino acid identity of 32–52% to known quaranjaviruses. The sequences were most closely related to the Wellfleet Bay virus, detected and isolated from common eider during a mortality event in the USA.

Conclusions: In summary, this study has identified a highly divergent virus with in the Orthomyxoviridae family associated with Rhipicephalus ticks from Mozambique. Further genetic and biological studies are needed in order to investigate potential pathogenesis of the identified orthomyxovirus.

KEYWORDS: Ticks, arthropods, Rhipicephalus, quaranjavirus, viral metagenomics, Mozambique

Introduction

Arthropods can act as biological vectors that transmit infectious agents and thereby cause diseases in humans and animals. After mosquitoes, ticks are the most common arthropod vector for viruses, bacteria, and other parasites causing different vector-borne diseases. Ticks from different parts of the world have been shown to carry viruses belonging to, for example, the Bunyaviridae, Flaviviridae, Asfaviridae and Orthomyxoviridae families [1]. Additionally, ticks carry many non-pathogenic microbes, and some of these microbes have formed symbiotic relationships with their hosts and transmit by vertical transmission [25].

The genus Rhipicephalus, belonging to the Ixodidae family (family of hard ticks), is widely distributed worldwide and is considered a potential vector of several emerging pathogens. Different studies have shown that viral pathogens, such as Thogoto viruses, Wad Medani virus, Nairobi sheep disease virus, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus, African swine fever virus and Tick-borne encephalitis virus [1,68], can be found in Rhipicephalus ticks. Borrelia, Anaplasma, Rickettsia, Ehrlichia, and Babesia are a few examples of the pathogenic bacteria that have been identified in these types of ticks [9,10].

With the advent of metagenomic approaches, the limitations of culture-based methods have been overcome and have enabled the characterization of the entire microbiota associated with the host. Numerous studies have used metagenomics to explore viral communities in different arthropod species and have in these identified viruses associated with a broad range of animals, plants and insects. Many of the identified viruses have been novel, for example, highly divergent viruses belonging to nairoviruses and phleboviruses were reported in Amblyomma and Ixodes ticks from the USA [1113] and in Rhipicephalus ticks [14].

Previous reports indicate that many tick-borne disease-causing agents exist in Mozambique, such as Nairobi sheep disease virus, Theleiria and Anaplasma [15,16]. Since ticks are known vectors for potentially pathogenic and non-pathogenic viruses and the virome of ticks is understudied in this region, the current study used viral metagenomics to identify viruses associated with Rhipicephalus ticks collected in the Zambezi Valley of Mozambique.

Material and methods

Tick collection and identification

Fifty-one adult ticks were collected in October 2014 from small ruminants in the Cuacua village of the Zambezia province in central Mozambique (Geographical coordinates S 17°48.043ʹ E 035°24.730ʹ). Tick collection was carried out on private land with the permission from the landowner and the local farmers. The collected ticks were stored in RNAlater (Invitrogen), transported to the laboratory, and stored at −80°C until further use. Individual ticks were identified morphologically to determine the genus; however, the sex of the ticks was not determined. The ticks were surface-sterilized with 95% ethanol and rinsed twice in water before nucleic acid extraction.

Nucleic acid extraction

Each tick pool (up to 3 ticks/pool) was mechanically homogenized using the Tissuelyser II (Qiagen) for 30 cycles/sec with 1 ml of TRIzol LS reagent (Invitrogen) and two 5 mm stainless steel beads. The supernatant was collected after centrifugation at 13,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C. Total RNA was extracted from the homogenate according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the RNA pellet was dissolved in 40 µl of nuclease-free water. After extracting RNA from the aqueous phase of the TRIzol homogenate, the remaining slurry containing the interphase/organic phase was saved at −80°C. Next, 5 µl of RNA from each tube was combined into a single pool, and the RNA was treated with DNase from the RNase-free DNase set (Qiagen) and purified with the RNeasy MinElute Cleanup kit (Qiagen). Ribosomal RNA was depleted using the RiboZero kit (RiboZero Gold Human/Mouse/Rat, Illumina) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and the RNA was again concentrated using the RNeasy MinElute Cleanup kit (Qiagen).

cDNA labeling, amplification and sequencing

First strand cDNA synthesis, followed by labeling of cDNA and random amplification, was performed with 10 µl of RNA, as described by Cholleti et al. 2016 [17]. The final amplified product were submitted to the National Genomics Centre (SciLife Lab, Uppsala, Sweden) for library preparation and sequencing. High-throughput sequencing was performed with the Ion Torrent PGM sequencing platform using an Ion 318TM chip (v2) and 400 bp read length chemistry. The raw sequencing data are accessible through NCBI’s Sequence Read Archive, SRA: SRP109282.

Sequence processing and taxonomy assignment

The sequences produced from the Ion Torrent platform were quality checked by filtering reads with low quality scores (Q < 20), removing exact duplicate reads and trimming the ends of the reads with PRINSEQ [18]. Good quality reads were mapped to different tick genomes Ixodes scapularis (GenBank assembly accession no. GCF_000208615.1) and Rhipicephalus sanguineus complete mitochondrial genome (GenBank accession no. NC_002074.1), using the default settings of Bowtie2 [19]. Unmapped reads were subjected to BLAST searches querying against NCBI nucleotide (nt) and protein sequence (nr) databases with an e-value cutoff of 1e-03. Reads that were classified as viruses were further assembled to generate longer sequences using the de novo assembler in CodonCode Aligner 6.02 (CodonCode Corporation) and SeqMan 11.2.1 (DNASTAR).

Confirmation of sequences and recovery of genomic ends

The viral contigs were used as a reference for designing specific primers to confirm and analyze the sequences of terminal ends, performed by the rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE). All of the primers used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S2. PCR amplification was performed at the following conditions: 95°C for 10 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec, 55–60°C for 30 sec, 72°C for 1 min and finally holding at 72°C for 7 min. RACE products were purified with a GeneJet PCR purification kit (ThermoFisher Scientific) and sequenced at Macrogen Europe (Macrogen Inc.).

Phylogenetic analysis

The phylogenetic tree was constructed using amino acid sequences of selected viruses. For this, viral sequences were downloaded from GenBank and multiple sequence alignment (MSA) was performed using ClustalW with default parameters. The gaps and missing data were eliminated prior to phylogenetic analysis and the tree was generated using maximum likelihood (ML) method using MEGA 7 (version 7.0.26). The statistical significance of the tree topologies was evaluated by 1000 bootstrap replicates.

Results

The ticks were morphologically identified to the genus level, and it was determined that all of the collected ticks belonged to the genus Rhipicephalus. Ion Torrent sequencing of the viral RNA metagenome produced 5.4 million reads. After quality control, 88.3% of the reads were classified as good quality, with an average read length of 261 bp. The reads were mapped to two tick genomes (Ixodes and Rhipicephalus), which excluded 5.6% of the reads (Table 1). To perform taxonomic profiling of the tick viral metagenome, unmapped reads were classified by BLASTn and BLASTx searches. The majority of the reads were found to be unassigned (58%), and 38% of the reads were eukaryotic sequences derived primarily from the arthropod genome (Figure 1). The proportion of reads that were derived from bacteria was 3.6% (163,025 reads), and only 0.09% (4092 reads) were derived from viruses. The viral reads were categorized at the family level. These viral reads corresponded to 7 different viral families and 2 other viral groups, including unclassified dsDNA viruses and environmental samples (Table 2).

Table 1.

Sample information, quality checks and host mapping of reads.

Sample name Total number of reads Good quality reads (%) Bad quality reads Mean read length Host mapped reads Unmapped reads
Rhipicephalus ticks 5,442,915 5,209,929 (88.3%) 640,505 (11.7%) 261 292,603 (5.6%) 4,802,410

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Taxonomic profiling of reads from Rhipicephalus spp. ticks.

Table 2.

Number of reads belonging to each viral family.

Viral family Number of reads
Orthomyxoviridae 4008
Parvoviridae 39
Retroviridae 17
Coronaviridae 10
Environmental sample 6
dsRNA virus 4
Rhabdoviridae 4
Totiviridae 3
Bunyaviridae 1
Total 4092

Orthomyxoviridae family

In total, 4008 reads (98% of all viral reads) were classified within the Orthomyxoviridae family (Figure 2). At the amino acid level, the reads showed closest similarity to members of the Quaranjavirus genus, such as the Wellfleet Bay virus (WFBV), Tjuloc vius (TLV), Quaranfil virus (QRFV), Johnstol Atoll virus (JAV) and unclassified quaranjaviruses. No significant similarities were observed at the nucleotide level. Assembly of these reads generated 6 contigs with high sequencing depth and lengths ranging from 218 to 2353 nucleotides (nt) (Table 3). BLAST searches of these contigs revealed that they show similarities to the nearly full-length segments of Wellfleet Bay virus and Tjuloc virus ORFs: Hemagglutinin (HA), Nucleoprotein (NP), Polymerase basic 1 protein (PB1), Polymerase basic 2 protein (PB2), and Polymerase Acidic protein (PA) (Figure 2). However, the identified ORFs exhibit high genetic diversity to known quaranjavirus genomes, with an amino acid identity of only 32–55%, indicating that these represent novel viral sequences belonging to the Quaranjavirus genus. One of the contigs (contig6, 218 nt long) showed an amino acid identity of 55% to the NP protein of WFBV; however, it did not assemble with the other NP-classified reads in the data set. The BLAST hit results for this contig included a hypothetical protein of the Tjuloc virus and Quaranfil virus with an identity of 32%. This contig could, therefore, be a matrix protein or another viral protein divergent from previously known quranjaviral segments. The 3′ UTR sequences of the HA and NP sequences were recovered using RACE analysis. The 3′ UTR could not be recovered from the other segments, nor could any 5′ UTR be recovered.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Schematic representation of the contigs covering different segments of the quaranjavirus. The name of the reference virus, segment and length of the ORFs (in amino acids) are shown in boxes with black lines (top). Contigs that are aligned to each segment are represented as color-shaded thick lines (bottom).

Table 3.

Orthomyxoviridae family reads assembly, BLAST search and coverage.

Contig name Contig length Classification Closest identity Segment (aa length) Coveragea
(aa identity)
No. of assembled reads
contig1 2314 Quaranjavirus Tjuloc virus PB2 (782) 20–756 (32%) 1915
contig2 1579 Quaranjavirus Wellfleet Bay virus NP (537) 37–537 (33%) 998
contig3 1430 Quaranjavirus Tjuloc virus HA (511) 54–511 (40%) 536
contig4 2245 Quaranjavirus Wellfleet Bay virus PB1 (770) 37–762 (52%) 302
contig5 1817 Quaranjavirus Wellfleet Bay virus PA (784) 164–769 (39%) 246
contig6 218 Quaranjavirus Wellfleet Bay virus/
Tjuloc virus
NP (537)/Hypothetical (524) 356–445 (38%)/
342–432(38%)
5

aThe contigs aligning to the amino acid positions of the closest relative and its identity

Evolutionary relationships was analyzed using PB1 as it is considered the most conserved of the orthomyxovirus genes. The phylogenetic analysis of the PB1 protein sequences, including Influenza A, B, C, Thogotovirus and Quaranjavirus, showed that PB1 from the novel quaranjavirus, identified in this study, formed a separate branch in the quaranjavirus group and was most closely related to WFBV (with 100% bootstrap support) (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Phylogenetic analysis of novel quaranjavirus with other viruses in the Orthomyxoviridae family. The phylogeny consists of PB1 protein sequences from 19 different viruses including the novel quaranjavirus from the current study. A total of 664 amino acid positions were used to build the tree and bootstrap values >60% are displayed. The PB1 nucleotide sequence (contig4) from this study has been submitted to GenBank as Zambezi tick virus 1 (ZaTV-1) under the accession number MH267793. The GenBank accession number, virus name, host, location, strain and year are shown for each virus used in the analysis.

Other viral families

Sequences similar to Parvoviridae, Retroviridae, Coronaviridae, unclassified dsRNA viruses and environmental samples were also identified in the ticks (Table 2). Assembly of the sequences belonging to the Parvoviridae family generated 5 contigs ranging between 354–870 nt. These contigs showed an amino acid identity (26–62%) to the non-structural protein 1 of Cherax quadricarinatus densovirus (accession no. YP009134732.1), Lonestar tick densovirus 1 (ASU47551.1) and Ambidensovirus CaaDV1 (AR146481.1). A single contig (448 nt) was generated from the assembly of the coronavirus reads. This contig showed the closest identity to ORF1a of Duck coronavirus (AKF17723.1); however, the similarity at the amino acid level was only 24% (Supplementary Table S1). Sequences classified as Retroviridae family showed low sequence identity (25–35%) to known viral proteins (polymerase of Feline foamy virus, gag protein of human immune deficiency virus 1 and Simian immune deficiency virus) and it was not possible to assemble them into longer contigs, possibly due to the absence of overlaps or high sequence diversity.

Discussion

In this study, a metagenomic approach was used to identify viruses associated with Rhipicephalus ticks in the Zambezi Valley of Mozambique where the surveillance of tick-associated pathogens is limited. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study where high-throughput sequencing have been used to explore the viruses present in ticks from Mozambique. The majority of the viral sequences belonged to the Orthomyxoviride family and was therefore studied in more detail; however, other viral families such as Parvoviridae and Coronaviridae were also identified. Many of these viral sequences showed very low sequence identity to known viruses, indicating that they most likely correspond to novel viruses.

The Orthomyxoviridae family consists of six recognized genera: Influenza A, B, and C, Isavirus, Thogotovirus, Quaranjavirus and the newly proposed Influenza D. Viruses in this family infect a broad range of hosts including humans, birds, swine, fish and arthropods, and transmission occurs by different routes such as fecal-oral, water, air, and direct contact [20]. The genus Quaranjavirus was approved by ICTV in 2011 and included two new species, Quaranfil virus (QRFV) and Johnston Atoll virus (JAV), as well as a tentative member, Lake Chad virus (LKCV). These viruses were isolated in the 1950s and 1960s but were only recently recognized as quaranjaviruses. They appear to be mainly associated with ticks (QRFV and JAV) and birds (LKCV) [2124]. In the present study, novel viral sequences showing sequence identity to quaranjaviruses were characterized from Rhipicephalus spp. ticks in Mozambique using high-throughput sequencing. These sequences are highly divergent from all known quaranjaviruses, with approximately 50% amino acid identity. BLASTx search analyses show that these sequences are most closely related to WFBV and TLV. In the phylogeny, the PB1 protein sequence from this study clustered with quaranjaviruses and showed closest relationship to WFBV. At this point, we are not sure if the sequences found in this study belong to one, two or more viruses. Future studies are needed to show this. The mechanism of transmission is uncertain, but it is speculated that soft and hard ticks are the primary vectors [25,26]. Several studies have identified quaranjaviruses in other arthropod vectors, such as spiders, mosquitoes and horseflies [27]. Little is known about the molecular pathogenesis of quaranjaviruses. The viruses in this genus are globally distributed throughout the Middle East, Africa and Pacific regions.

Parvoviruses are associated with a variety of chronic diseases in humans and animals. However, these viral sequences have the ability to integrate into the chromosomal DNA of a wide range of hosts and may transmit to offspring. The parvovirus sequences identified in the current study had closest similarity to non-structural protein 1 of different densoviruses, which were shown previously to integrate into tick genomes such as in Ixodes, Amblyomma and Rhipicephalus genera [28,29]. We assume that these sequences are either endogenous viral elements of the tick genome or DNA from densoviruses remaining in the RNA due to incomplete DNase treatment during the sample preparation step.

Ticks can be co-infected with different bacteria and viruses and may thus be involved in co-transmission of different pathogens, which may enhance disease severity as reported previously [30]. In contrast, endosymbionts may interact with arthropod-borne pathogens and play a crucial role in the fitness of the arthropod vector. For instance, Coxiella endosymbionts of Amblyomma ticks impair the transmission of Ehrlichia chaffiensis [31]. Further, in another important arthropod vector, the mosquito, the Wolbachia symbiont can limit the replication of several pathogenic viruses such as Dengue virus, yellow fever virus, West Nile virus and different protozoans such as Plasmodium [3234]. It has also been demonstrated that pathogens may influence the microbiome of arthropod vectors by modulating immune responses for its survival and infection [35]. Thus, characterizing the microbiome of ticks and other arthropods is just the first step to understanding the complex interactions between the different microorganisms that reside within the vector.

In summary, we have identified a novel and highly divergent orthomyxovirus in Rhipicephalus spp. ticks in Mozambique. This study constitutes the initial step towards a more comprehensive understanding of the viruses circulating in ticks. Additional investigations are warranted on the functional and ecological aspects of the identified orthomyxovirus. This increased understanding of the tick-borne viruses highlights the role in emergence and transmission of disease-causing agents.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by Svenska Forskingrådet Formas (2012-586) and Vetenskaprådet (2012-138).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the National Genomics Infrastructure (NGI)/Uppsala Genome Center and UPPMAX for providing assistance in massive parallel sequencing and computational infrastructure. Work performed at NGI/Uppsala Genome Center has been funded by RFI/VR and Science for Life Laboratory, Sweden. The authors also thank SLU Global Bioinformatics Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala for providing computational time for the data analysis. The authors would also like to thank the Swedish VR (SWE-2012-138) and FORMAS (2012-586) for financial support to conduct this study. The funder had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or reprinting of the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings will be available at NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) with accession number: SRP109282.

Supplementary material

Supplementary data can be accessed here

Supplemental Material

References

  • [1]. Labuda M, Nuttall PA.. Tick-borne viruses. Parasitology. 2004;129(Suppl): S221–S45. PubMed PMID: 15938513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2]. Ahantarig A, Trinachartvanit W, Baimai V, et al. Hard ticks and their bacterial endosymbionts (or would be pathogens). Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2013. September;58(5):419–8. PubMed PMID: 23334948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3]. Clayton KA, Gall CA, Mason KL, et al. The characterization and manipulation of the bacterial microbiome of the rocky mountain wood tick, dermacentor andersoni. Parasit Vectors. 2015. December 10;(8):632 PubMed PMID: 26653035; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4674957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4]. Narasimhan S, Fikrig E. Tick microbiome: the force within. Trends Parasitol. 2015. July;31(7):315–323. PubMed PMID: 25936226; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4492851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5]. Machado-Ferreira E, Vizzoni VF, Balsemao-Pires E, et al. Coxiella symbionts are widespread into hard ticks. Parasitol Res. 2016. December;115(12):4691–4699. PubMed PMID: 27595990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6]. Albanese M, Bruno-Smiraglia C, Di di Cuonzo G, et al. Isolation of thogoto virus from Rhipicephalus bursa ticks in western sicily. Acta Virol. 1972. May;16(3):267 PubMed PMID: 4680821. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7]. Charrel RN, Attoui H, Butenko AM, et al. Tick-borne virus diseases of human interest in Europe. Clin Microbiology Infection: Official Publication Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004. December;10(12):1040–1055. PubMed PMID: 15606630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8]. Hubalek Z, Rudolf I. Tick-borne viruses in Europe. Parasitol Res. 2012. July;111(1):9–36. PubMed PMID: 22526290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9]. Wang YZ, Mu LM, Zhang K, et al. A broad-range survey of ticks from livestock in Northern Xinjiang: changes in tick distribution and the isolation of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto. Parasit Vectors. 2015. September 04;(8):449 PubMed PMID: 26337627; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4560164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10]. Hartelt K, Oehme R, Frank H, et al. Pathogens and symbionts in ticks: prevalence of anaplasma phagocytophilum (Ehrlichia sp.), wolbachia sp., Rickettsia sp., and Babesia sp. in Southern Germany. Intl J Med Microbiol: IJMM. 2004. April;293(Suppl 37):86–92. PubMed PMID: 15146989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11]. Tokarz R, Williams SH, Sameroff S, et al. Virome analysis of amblyomma americanum, dermacentor variabilis, and ixodes scapularis ticks reveals novel highly divergent vertebrate and invertebrate viruses. J Virol. 2014. October;88(19):11480–11492. PubMed PMID: 25056893; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4178814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12]. Sakamoto JM, Ng TFF, Suzuki Y, et al. Bunyaviruses are common in male and female Ixodes scapularis ticks in central Pennsylvania. PeerJ. 2016;4:e2324 PubMed PMID: 27602290; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4991847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13]. Carpi G, Cagnacci F, Wittekindt NE, et al. Metagenomic profile of the bacterial communities associated with Ixodes ricinus ticks. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25604 PubMed PMID: 22022422; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3192763 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14]. Xia H, Hu C, Zhang D, et al. Metagenomic profile of the viral communities in Rhipicephalus spp. ticks from Yunnan, China. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0121609 PubMed PMID: 25799057; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4370414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15]. Norval RA, Lawrence JA, Young AS, et al. Theileria parva: influence of vector, parasite and host relationships on the epidemiology of theileriosis in southern Africa. Parasitology. 1991. June;102(Pt 3):347–356. PubMed PMID: 1907728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16]. Machado RZ, Teixeira MM, Rodrigues AC, et al. Molecular diagnosis and genetic diversity of tick-borne Anaplasmataceae agents infecting the African buffalo syncerus caffer from marromeu reserve in Mozambique. Parasit Vectors. 2016. August 17;(9):454 PubMed PMID: 27531003; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4987998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17]. Cholleti H, Hayer J, Abilio AP, et al. Discovery of novel viruses in mosquitoes from the Zambezi valley of Mozambique. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0162751 PubMed PMID: 27682810; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5040392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18]. Schmieder R, Edwards R. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics. 2011. March 15;27(6):863–864. PubMed PMID: 21278185; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3051327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19]. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012. March 04;9(4):357–359. PubMed PMID: 22388286; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3322381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20]. Webster RG, Bean WJ, Gorman OT, et al. Evolution and ecology of influenza A viruses. Microbiol Rev. 1992. March;56(1):152–179. PubMed PMID: 1579108; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC372859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21]. Presti RM, Zhao G, Beatty WL, et al. Quaranfil, Johnston atoll, and lake chad viruses are novel members of the family orthomyxoviridae. J Virol. 2009. November;83(22):11599–11606. PubMed PMID: 19726499; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2772707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22]. Taylor RM, Hurlbut HS, Work TH, et al. Arboviruses isolated from ARGAS TICKS IN Egypt: quaranfil, Chenuda, and Nyamanini. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1966. January;15(1):76–86. PubMed PMID: 5901633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23]. Kemp GE, Lee VH, Moore DL. Isolation of Nyamanini and Quaranfil viruses from Argas (Persicargas) arboreus ticks in Nigeria. J Med Entomol. 1975. December 30;12(5):535–537. PubMed PMID: 1223303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24]. Clifford CM, Thomas LA, Hughes LE, et al. Identification and comparison of two viruses isolated from ticks of the genus Ornithodoros. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1968. November;17(6):881–885. PubMed PMID: 4973055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25]. Allison AB, Ballard JR, Tesh RB, et al. Cyclic avian mass mortality in the northeastern USA is associated with a novel orthomyxovirus. J Virol. 2015. January 15;89(2):1389–1403. PubMed PMID: 25392223; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4300652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26]. Kessell A, Hyatt A, Lehmann D, et al. Cygnet River virus, a novel orthomyxovirus from ducks, Australia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012. December;18(12):2044–2046. PubMed PMID: 23171630; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3557875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27]. Li CX, Shi M, Tian JH, et al. Unprecedented genomic diversity of RNA viruses in arthropods reveals the ancestry of negative-sense RNA viruses. eLife. 2015. January 29;4 DOI: 10.7554/eLife.05378 PubMed PMID: 25633976; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4384744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28]. Francois S, Filloux D, Roumagnac P, et al. Discovery of parvovirus-related sequences in an unexpected broad range of animals. Sci Rep. 2016. September 07;(6):30880 PubMed PMID: 27600734; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5013282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29]. Liu H, Fu Y, Xie J, et al. Widespread endogenization of densoviruses and parvoviruses in animal and human genomes. J Virol. 2011. October;85(19):9863–9876. PubMed PMID: 21795360; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3196449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30]. Krause PJ, Telford SR 3rd, Spielman A, et al. Concurrent lyme disease and babesiosis: evidence for increased severity and duration of illness. Jama. 1996;275(21):1657–1660. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31]. Klyachko O, Stein BD, Grindle N, et al. Localization and visualization of a coxiella-type symbiont within the lone star tick, Amblyomma americanum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007. October;73(20):6584–6594. PubMed PMID: 17720830; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2075054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32]. Moreira LA, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Jeffery JA, et al. A wolbachia symbiont in aedes aegypti limits infection with dengue, Chikungunya, and Plasmodium. Cell. 2009. December 24;139(7):1268–1278. PubMed PMID: 20064373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33]. van den Hurk AF, Hall-Mendelin S, Pyke AT, et al. Impact of Wolbachia on infection with chikungunya and yellow fever viruses in the mosquito vector Aedes aegypti. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(11):e1892 PubMed PMID: 23133693; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3486898 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34]. Paradkar PN, Trinidad L, Voysey R, et al. Secreted vago restricts West Nile virus infection in culex mosquito cells by activating the Jak-STAT pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012. November 13;109(46):18915–18920. PubMed PMID: 23027947; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3503207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35]. Abraham NM, Liu L, Jutras BL, et al. Pathogen-mediated manipulation of arthropod microbiota to promote infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017. January 31;114(5):E781–E790. PubMed PMID: 28096373; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5293115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Material

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings will be available at NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) with accession number: SRP109282.


Articles from Infection Ecology & Epidemiology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES