Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2018 Mar 26;8:5163. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23562-5

Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae for diagnostics, and extra-cellular metabolomics and biochemical monitoring

Y Chen 1, W R Premasiri 1, L D Ziegler 1,
PMCID: PMC5980109  PMID: 29581560

Abstract

SERS spectra excited at 785 nm of the bacteria Chlamydia trahomatis (elementary bodies, EB) and Neisseria gonorrheoae, the causative pathogens for the two most common sexually transmitted diseases (STD), chlamydia and gonorrhea, respectively, are reported. Although both are Gram-negative bacteria, the SERS signatures of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrheoae are completely different. N. gonorrheoae SERS spectra are due to the starvation induced nucleotide metabolites adenine and guanine, and the surface associated co-enzyme nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide and are very similar on Au and Ag although the spectrum appears more rapidly on Ag. The C. trachomatis SERS spectrum is dominated by the vibrational features of cell surface proteins. While features attributable to specific residues and the amide backbone characterize the C. trachomatis spectrum on Ag, the corresponding SERS spectrum on Au substrates displays vibrational characteristics of aggregated proteins. The prospects for the development of a SERS based platform for rapid (<one hour), low-cost bacterial STD diagnostics are promising based on these initial studies. Furthermore, this biomedical application demonstrates the potential for SERS to be a sensitive real time probe of the dynamics of biochemical activity in the cell wall and extracellular regions of microorganisms.

Introduction

Sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) continue to be a significant cause of morbidity in the US with ~$15.9 billion spent annually on healthcare costs related to their diagnosis and treatment1. Chlamydia, the most common bacterial sexually transmitted disease (STD) in the US, is caused by infection from the Gram-negative bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis2. More than 1.5 million cases of chlamydia were reported to the CDC in 2015, an increase of nearly 6% over 20142. Chlamydia infection can lead to pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancies and chronic pelvic pain in women3. In addition, chlamydia increases the risk of HIV transmission and infection4, and results in conjunctivitis, pharyngitis and pneumonia in newborns via perinatal transmission5.

C. trachomatis is an obligate intracellular bacterium requiring an eukaryotic host cell to complete its life cycle6. It has a metabolically-active, noninfectious form called a reticulated body (RB) and a metabolically-inactive but infectious form called an elementary body (EB). EBs are relatively small particles (~0.3 μm diameter) with a unique rigid, disulfide cross-linked outer membrane protein complex that helps maintain the structural integrity of the EB6. Following invasion of eukaryotic cells, EBs are converted to RBs, the intracellular replicating form of this organism. Approximately 20 hours after infection and subsequent multiple divisions by binary fission, the RB differentiates into the EB developmental stage and the infectious EBs are subsequently released to initiate new rounds of infection7.

Gonorrhea, the second most commonly reported bacterial STD in the US, results from infection by the Gram-negative bacterium Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Since 2011, the prevalence of gonorrhea in the US and Europe has shown a steady increase2,8. Patients with gonorrhea are often asymptomatic until complications arise such as pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy and infertility. Untreated gonorrhea can lead to disseminated gonococcal infection (DGI) when N. gonorrhoeae spreads to the blood or other parts of the body9. Gonococcal infections also can facilitate the transmission of HIV10. Since ~30% of patients infected with N. gonorrhoeae are co-infected with C. trachomatis11, patients treated for gonococcal infection are often routinely treated with an antibiotic regimen that is effective against C. trachomatis infection as well12.

Although sensitive and specific, the traditional cell culture method for chlamydia diagnosis is a technically demanding, very slow (≥72 hours) procedure rendering it unrealistic for routine and point-of-care diagnostics13. Similarly, N. gonorrhoeae is also a fastidious organism requiring enriched media in a CO2 atmosphere for lab cultured growth for ≥48 hours. Non-culture methods for STD diagnostics, such as enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and direct fluorescent antibody stain (DFA) based techniques have been recently developed1315. However, nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) are the current best technology for chlamydia and gonorrhea diagnostics13. It is a growth-free diagnostic offering sensitivity and specificity comparable to culturing methods but with a faster turnaround time (~hours)16. However, cross-contamination, cost, inability to distinguish bacterial viability (i.e. live vs. dead cells), the presence of inhibitory factors and the need for experienced technicians in laboratory settings are NAAT limitations17,18. Given the asymptomatic nature of many chlamydia and gonorrhea infections, screening is recognized as the most effective approach for reducing the societal and personal impact of these diseases13,16. Thus, the development of alternative, low-cost, easy-to-use, point-of-care approaches for the detection and simultaneously differentiation of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae infections in clinical settings in a useful timeframe (≤one hour) for narrow spectrum antibiotic drug prescription remains a critical strategy for improving reproductive and sexual health worldwide.

Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) is an attractive methodology for biomedical diagnostics owing to its rapid, sensitive, specific, easy-to-use, label-free and multiplexing capabilities for molecular detection and identification1921. Although SERS spectra of lab cultured bacterial cells have been reported over the past fifteen years2230, there have been no previous attempts to employ this optical approach for STD bacterial pathogen diagnostics. Previous SERS efforts in our lab have resulted in the development of a nanoparticle covered SiO2 substrate and multivariate data analysis procedures for the acquisition and identification of 785 nm excited SERS spectra of vegetative bacterial cells24,3134. Furthermore, we have identified the molecular and biochemical origins of these bacterial signals, and demonstrated their use for the diagnosis of blood and urinary tract infections3539.

Here, we report on the ability of SERS to provide rapid, growth-free, detection and identification of the Chlamydia and gonorrhea etiological agents, C. trachomatis (EBs) and N. gonorrhoeae. The prospects for the development of a SERS based platform for rapid (<one hour), low-cost STD diagnostic are promising based on these initial studies. Furthermore, this biomedical diagnostic application demonstrates the potential for SERS to be a sensitive real time probe of the dynamics of biochemical activity in the cell wall and extracellular regions of these pathogenic organisms.

Results and Discussion

C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae SERS on Au and Ag substrates

785 nm excited SERS spectra of C. trachomatis serovar D and N. gonorrhoeae FA1090 enriched cellular suspensions on Au and Ag substrates (red and blue spectra, respectively) are shown in Figs 1 and 2, as a function of time after washing. Very different vibrational features characterize the SERS signatures of N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis on both the Au and Ag substrates at all post-washing times. Thus, phenomenologically alone, these data demonstrate the potential capacity for SERS to readily distinguish these two Gram-negative STD bacterial pathogens on either Au or Ag nanoparticle substrates. Importantly, these differences are observed immediately following sample preparation (t = 0 min).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

SERS spectra of C. trachomatis cells and supernatant (without cells) on Au and Ag substrates as a function of time after final (cold) water wash. Although C. trachomatis shows dramatically different SERS features on these two nanostructured metal substrates, no SERS signal is observed from the supernatant at all post washing times.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

SERS spectra of N. gonorrhoeae cells and supernatant (without cells) on Au and Ag substrates. N. gonorrhoeae shows similar features on theses substrate and the supernatant signal is delayed relative to that from the cells. The dotted vertical lines highlight the disappearance of a feature at ~1030 cm−1 and an increase in relative prominence of a band at ~960 cm−1 with time.

Secondly, although the SERS spectra of N. gonorrhoeae appear fairly similar on both Au and Ag substrates (Fig. 2a,b), the SERS spectra of C. trachomatis cells on Au and Ag are dramatically different. The C. trachomatis SERS spectrum (Fig. 1a) on Au exhibits three broad (~150–200 cm−1) spectral features centered at ~900 cm−1, ~1200 cm−1 and ~1550 cm−1. These unusually broad Raman features are not observed in the C. trachomatis SERS spectrum on Ag (Fig. 1b), where instead only discreet, more typically narrow (~10 cm−1) vibrational bands are evident with prominent bands at 936, 1002, 1035, 1385, 1446 and 1600 cm−1. In addition to this dramatic spectral signature difference, the relative intensity of the C. trachomatis spectrum on Ag is more than an order of magnitude weaker (counts/cell) than on Au.

As illustrated in Figs 1 and 2, the N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis spectra display different reproducible time-dependencies on both metal substrates. The C. trachomatis signal intensity on Au decreases by ~80% in ~60 min but, in contrast, remains essentially constant on Ag over that time. The N. gonorrhoeae cell spectrum on both Au and Ag appears promptly (at t = 0 min) and increases by a factor of ~3–5 over a one hour period. However, some N. gonorrhoeae SERS vibrational frequencies and relative intensities exhibit a time dependence. For example, a band at ~ 1030 cm−1 evident in the early time spectra of N. gonorrhoeae on Au and Ag virtually vanishes and a ~960 cm−1 feature correspondingly grows in with time (dashed lines in Fig. 2a,b). Furthermore, over the course of an hour, the most intense N. gonorrhoeae vibrational band blue shifts from 731.0 cm−1 to 733.5 cm−1 on Ag and from 733.0 to 734.5 on Au (Supplementary Information Figure S1). As discussed below, these changes are attributable to biochemical activity and are spectral features that may also be used as characteristics for STD pathogen identification.

The C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae SERS spectra shown in Figs 1 and 2 were obtained for sample concentrations of 105 ifu/mL and 106 cfu/mL, respectively, as determined by serial dilution and overnight cell culturing. Using the described sample handling protocols, the lowest C. trachomatis EB concentration to yield SERS signals were ~104 ifu/mL on Au, and ~102 ifu/mL on Ag substrates. The lowest concentration of N. gonorrhoeae to yield a SERS signal on the Au and Ag substrates via this simple enrichment procedure is ~105 cfu/mL. (See Supplementary Information Figures S2 and S3).

SERS spectra of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae supernatant

The SERS spectra of the (cell-free) supernatant surrounding the N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis cells in the water washed suspension on Au and Ag substrates as a function of post washing time are compared to the corresponding cell suspension spectra in Figs 1 and 2. Despite the very different cell spectra on Au and Ag substrates, no SERS C. trachomatis signal can be detected from the supernatant at all post-washing times on both metal surfaces (Fig. 1). The requirement that molecules be ≤ ~5 nm from nanostructured substrates for effective plasmonic enhancement eliminates molecules in the C. trachomatis cytoplasm as being the source of the observed cellular SERS signatures. Thus, the SERS spectra of C. trachomatis are only attributable to cell wall features.

In contrast, the SERS spectra of the N. gonorrhoeae supernatant on both Au and Ag (Fig. 2) exhibit a time-dependent signature that becomes nearly equivalent to the cell SERS spectrum after ~30–60 min. Following the final water washing (t = 0 min), no significant SERS spectrum is observed from the N. gonorrhoeae supernatant while the N. gonorrhoeae cells exhibit a strong signal on both Au and Ag substrates (Fig. 2a,b). Thus, this early time spectrum originates from N. gonorrhoeae cell wall or cell wall associated molecules. At longer times (30 and 60 min), supernatant and cell SERS spectra appear to be nearly identical. Thus, unlike C. trachomatis, the N. gonorrhoeae SERS spectra at these later times result from molecules that have been secreted into the supernatant.

While the results shown in Figs 1–4 are for averaged spectra (~10) of a single bacterial growth, we have obtained virtually identical results at each of the SERS acquisition times for all of the independent bacterial growths we have obtained. The standard deviation of normalized averaged SERS spectra of multiple growths of N. gonorrhoeae (four/three growths for cell spectra on Au/Ag; two/three growths for supernatant spectra on Au/Ag) are shown in Figure. S4. The N. gonorrhoeae SERS spectra and their time dependence are highly reproducible and the results described here are thus not growth dependent. SERS spectra of four independent growths of C. trachomatis also show a high degree of reproducibility (see below).

Molecular origins of N. gonorrhoeae SERS spectra

As previously shown, the 785 nm excited SERS spectra of bacteria are dominated by the contributions of purines or purine containing metabolites, such as adenine, hypoxanthine, guanine, xanthine, uric acid, guanosine, and AMP in the exogenous cellular region resulting from the metabolic degradation of nucleotides and nuclei acids as part of the rapid bacterial starvation response38,39. In these prior studies a spectral best-fitting procedure was used to determine the relative contribution of these purines to the observed bacterial SERS spectra. The same38,39 best-fitting procedure is employed here to identify the key molecular species that account for the N. gonorrhoeae SERS spectra as a function of time (Fig. 2). The resulting best fits to the observed N. gonorrhoeae SERS spectra of cell and supernatant (cell-free) samples on Ag and Au substrates at 0, 30 and 60 min post washing are displayed in Figs 3 and 4, respectively. Excellent fits based on Raman frequencies and relative intensities are found by including contributions primarily from adenine, guanine, and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) for the N. gonorrhoeae SERS spectra on Au substrates. On Ag substrates, a protein contribution (vide infra) is detected, in addition to these same three dominant purine components. Some unidentified components are evident at the earliest time on Ag. The normalized SERS spectra of the molecular components used for this fitting procedure are shown in Fig. 5. A summary of the molecular origins of the purinergic vibrational bands observed in the N. gonorrhoeae SERS spectra is given in Table 1 based on these individual molecular component spectra (Fig. 5). Characteristic vibrational bands, for example, adenine’s 734 cm−1 ring stretching mode, guanine’s 664 cm−1 ring stretching mode or the 1030 cm−1 nicotinamide ring breathing mode of NAD+ 40, distinguish most of these molecular contributors to the N. gonorrhoeae SERS spectra. The SERS spectra of the oxidized NAD+ and reduced NADH forms of this co-enzyme are identical on our substrates (Supplementary Figure S5). Both exhibit the NAD+ characteristic ~1030 cm−1 band40. However, since this vibrational frequency is absent in known NADH vibrational spectra40 either only NAD+ contributes to these the N. gonorrhoeae SERS spectra or the incompletely reduced Au+3 and Ag+ metal ions efficiently oxidizes all NADH. Thus we denote this component as NAD+/NADH (Figs 35). Normalized SERS spectra of a typical protein, human serum albumin (HSA) and the residual unknown component are also shown in this figure. Finally, it should be noted that small but reproducible frequency shifts and some relative intensity changes (e.g. absence of 960 cm−1 band in adenine on Ag spectrum) are metal dependent (Fig. 5).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Observed and best-fit SERS spectra of N. gonorrhoeae cells and supernatant as a function of post washing time on Au substrates (top left and right, respectively). Bar graphs show the corresponding best-fit determined relative amounts of adenine, NAD+/NADH and guanine (normalized spectra) at each post washing time for the N. gonorrhoeae cells and supernatant spectra.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Observed and best-fit SERS spectra of N. gonorrhoeae cells and supernatant as a function of post washing time on Ag substrates (top left and right, respectively). Bar graphs show the corresponding best-fit determined relative amounts of adenine, NAD+/NADH and guanine, protein and some unknown components (normalized spectra) at each post washing time for the N. gonorrhoeae cells and supernatant spectra.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(a) Normalized SERS spectra of the molecular components identified in the SERS spectra of N. gonorrhoeae on Au and Ag: nicotiamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+/NADH), adenine, and guanine. (b) An expanded view of the SERS spectra of these compounds in the 640–790 cm−1 range where characteristic small frequency shifts of the strongest bands are evident.

Table 1.

Vibrational assignments for N. gonorrhoeae SERS spectra.

Peak Position Au/Ag (cm−1) Molecular Assignment
481/481 Guanine
548/548 adenine/NAD+
622/621 Adenine
664/672 Guanine
733/731 NAD+
735/734 adenine
962/960 adenine/guanine/NAD+
1028/1032 NAD+
1236/1240 adenine
1316/1322 adenine/NAD+
1350/1339 guanine
1404/1401 adenine
1460/1469 adenine
1580/1580 adenine/guanine
1646/1606 guanine

The best-fit determined relative contributions of the normalized SERS molecular components to the observed SERS spectra of the N. gonorrhoeae cellular suspensions and the supernatant on both Au and Ag substrates as a function of time are summarized by the bar graphs in Figs 3 and 4. Some consistent trends and striking differences are observed in this time dependent SERS analysis. Initially (t = 0 min), no signal is detected on Au and only a very weak protein signature is observed on Ag in the supernantant only samples. By 60 min, both the cellular suspension and supernatant SERS spectra are nearly identical in terms of relative contributions of adenine, guanine and NAD+/NADH with adenine making the largest contribution at least in terms of this normalized analysis. Some observed systematic trends are the relative disappearance of NAD+ features and the growth of adenine and guanine signals with time (see Figures S1, 2–4). The loss of the ~1030 cm−1 band intensity, the small blue shift in the most intense feature from 731/733 to 734/735 cm−1 (Au/Ag) and the growth of the 960 cm−1 and ~664 cm−1 bands are indicators of these time-dependent purinergic effects. Finally comparison of Figs 3 and 4 reveal that the N. gonorrhoeae SERS spectra appear to evolve with a slower time dependence on Au substrates than on Ag surfaces. This appears to be a general characteristic of bacterial SERS spectra on the substrates used for these studies and may be attributable to the different perturbing effects of these metals or the different rates of metal-purine association in the exogenous metabolome of these cells. This will be the subject of a subsequent report. The relative contributions of normalized components to the N. gonorrhoeae SERS spectra (bar graphs in Figs 3 and 4) can be converted to relative number densities via the relative SERS susceptibilities given in Supplementary Figure S6 assuming no complexing or special solvation effects in the region of the bacterial cells.

Interestingly, despite its unequivocal presence in these N. gonorrhoeae SERS spectra, NAD+/NADH had not been identified in previously analyzed 785 nm excited bacterial SERS spectra38,39. To further probe the origin of this SERS contribution and assess its value for N. gonorrhoeae diagnostics, SERS spectra of an N. gonorrhoeae sample which had been left at room temperature for 60 min and re-washed with ice-cold water were obtained. The supernatant and cellular suspension SERS spectra of this 60 min rewashed sample on Au substrates are compared in Fig. 6 to the initial (t = 0 min) spectra (Fig. 3). The 60 min rewashed N. gonorrhoeae supernatant on Au exhibits no SERS spectrum as found for the original t = 0 min sample (Fig. 3). All purine metabolites in the exogenous region after 60 min of the initial water washing procedure have been removed by this procedure. Furthermore, in contrast to the 60 min spectrum of the original cellular sample attributable to adenine, guanine and NAD+/NADH (Fig. 3), the 60 min rewashed N. gonorrhoeae cellular suspension SERS spectrum is appears to be NAD+/NADH only with little detectable adenine and guanine. The increased relative intensity of the characteristic NAD+ 1030 cm−1 band and the decreased relative intensity of the adenine 960 cm−1 feature (dashed vertical lines Fig. 6), are indicative of this predominant NAD+ character of these re-washed cellular suspension spectra. (Supplementary Figure S7). Thus, these results are consistent with NAD+/NADH being located in the outer bacterial cell membrane region.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

SERS spectra of N. gonorrhoeae cells and supernatant on Au substrates at t = 0, immediately after enrichment are compared with the same sample after 60 min and rewashing in water (LHS). Dotted vertical lines at 960 cm−1 and 1030 cm−1 correspond to adenine and NAD+/NADH contributions. The re-washed 60 min spectrum only reveals NAD+/NADH associated with the cells. SERS spectra of cellular suspensions of 4 different bacterial species, 1 S. aureus and 3 E. coli strains, are correspondingly compared at t = 0 and for rewashed 60 min preparations, and no NAD+/NADH can be detected in any of these spectra (dotted vertical black line) (RHS).

Furthermore, on the right hand side of Fig. 6, SERS spectra of the 60 min rewashed cell suspensions of some E. coli strains (Gram negative) and an Staphylococcus aureus strain (Gram positive) are compared with their corresponding t = 0 SERS results and with the N. gonorrhoeae spectra on Au substrates. These other bacterial organisms were also grown in the same supplemented culture media. As seen in Fig. 6 (RHS), the absence of the 1030 cm−1 band in these spectra (black vertical line) indicates that the appearance of the cell outer layer associated NAD+/NADH in N. gonorrhoeae SERS spectra is further evidence that this SERS molecular component is not due to a sample preparation artifact such as residual growth culture media impurity and, at least in this limited comparison, is a unique property of N. gonorrhoeae. Since this NAD+ signature has not been evident in any other bacterial SERS spectrum that we have observed with 785 nm excitation38,39,41, the presence of this membrane bound or associated marker appears crucial for the unique identification of this pathogen and hence to the value of a SERS based platform for bacterial STD diagnostics. NAD+/NADH is co-substrate for the known N. gonorrhoeae membrane-bound enzymes, NADH dehydrogenase and NAD(P)H oxidase, that are critical for the growth of this organism in the human body and thus may account for the observed bounded NAD/NADH SERS signals for this species42,43.

Molecular origins of C. trachomatis SERS spectra

As discussed above, the molecules accounting for the C. trachomatis SERS spectra are securely located on the outer wall region of the EBs and are not in the exogenous supernatant in contrast to the origins of the N. gonorrhoeae SERS signatures (Fig. 2) and exhibit completely different, seemingly uncorrelated, characteristic spectral signatures on Au and Ag (Fig. 1). Unlike other Gram-negative bacteria, such as N. gonorrhoeae, the C. trachomatis EB cell envelope has two unusual features44. First, the typical peptidoglycan layer between the outer and an inner cell membrane is replaced by a supramolecular structure of cysteine rich proteins. Secondly, C. trachomatis EBs have unique outer membrane surface protein complexes characterized by highly cross-linked disulphides that are thought to convey structural integrity particularly against intracellular osmotic stress4547. As additional evidence implicating cell surface proteins as the origin of the C. trachomatis SERS spectrum, the observed discrete features for the Ag substrate spectra (see Table 2) match previously reported characteristic protein SERS vibrational frequencies4852. These band assignments correspond to aromatic residues, particularly phenylalanine, and peptide backbone motions.

Table 2.

Vibrational Assignment for C. trachomatis SERS spectra on Ag.

Peak Position (cm−1) Proposed Assignment*
610 ν(CS)
756 Trp
931 C-C, C-COO
1002 Phe ring breathing (ν12)
1035 Phe in-plane ring CH def.
1386 COO
1448 CH2 deformation
1599 Phe ring stretching

*Band assignments from refs4953.

As a test of this hypothesis, SERS spectra of several proteins on Au and Ag substrates were obtained and compared to C. trachomatis spectra. Solutions of these proteins were prepared following the same preparation protocols used for the C. trachomatis samples. SERS spectra of two of these proteins in aqueous solution on Au (100 µM) and Ag (10 nM) substrates, human serum albumin (HSA) and avidin, are compared to those of C. trachomatis from four growths in Fig. 7. The grey shading corresponds to ± one standard deviation of ~ten spectra of HSA and avidin, and from the C. trachomatis multiple growths relative to the averaged spectra (solid lines) and demonstrate the robustness of these SERS signatures. The different concentrations indicate the different relative SERS susceptibilities for proteins on the two metals as noted above for the C. trachomatis spectra. HSA and avidin are similarly sized proteins (~66–67 kDa) that are dominated by high alpha-helical and beta-sheet secondary structural content respectively. Despite these structural differences, the similarity between the protein and the C. trachomatis SERS spectra, as well as the strong metal dependence is clearly evident. The same three unusually broad bands centered at ~900 cm−1, ~1200 cm−1 and ~1550 cm−1 characterize the SERS spectra on Au, and narrow spectral features at ~931, 1002, 1035, 1386, 1448 and 1599 cm−1 are seen in the Ag substrate spectra for all three samples. Consistently similar SERS spectra have been observed for all other proteins and polypeptides we have obtained. (See Supplementary Figure S7). Thus, these results indicate that, in contrast to N. gonorrhoeae, the SERS spectra of C. trachomatis arise from protein molecules on or associated with the C. trachomatis cell surface.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

SERS spectra of C. trachomatis cells (from four growths), and aqueous solutions of the proteins human serum albumin (HSA) and avidin on (a) Au and (b) Ag substrates. The shaded areas indicate the standard deviation at each frequency to demonstrate the reproducibility of these spectra.

The unusual breadth and robust center frequency of the protein and C. trachomatis vibrational bands on Au substrates (Figs 1 and 7) suggest that these features may be due to protein aggregation. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements were carried out to determine protein size distributions in these solutions and then correlated with observed SERS spectra. This protein analysis is discussed in greater detail in a subsequent report. However, we note here that both the % mass of particles with larger radii and the observed broad SERS intensity of HSA and avidin on Au increased after vigorous mechanical agitation which is known to enhance protein aggregation53. (Supplementary Figure S8) Minimal and vigorous pipetting was used to generate the range of both shearing stress and cavitation resulting in induced aggregation. Thus, the correlated increase in particle sizes and broad SERS spectral intensity on Au strongly indicates that these anomalously broad SERS spectra of proteins, and by extension C. trachomatis, are due to protein aggregates created during the solution preparation process. During the C. trachomatis enrichment protocol, this must occur when the centrifuged bacterial cells are re-suspended in water after each centrifugation step and pipetting is used to disperse the cell pellet apparently resulting in the aggregation of the proteins on the outer layer of the cell membrane. The observed decrease of the C. trachomatis SERS intensity as a function of post washing time (Fig. 1) may arise from the structural relaxation of the agitation-induced protein aggregates on the cell surface.

In contrast, only narrower vibrational features with more typical vibrational widths and characteristic protein vibrational are found in the protein and C. trachcomatis SERS spectra on Ag. The assignments for the observed C. trachcomatis SERS bands on the Ag substrate are given in Table 2. These features correspond to characteristic vibrational transitions in aromatic amino acid residues (phenylalanine, tryptophan) and other characteristic polypeptide molecular moieties (C-S stretch, and CO2 and CH2 bending motions). The absence of this protein cluster features in the SERS spectra of C. trachcomatis and proteins is attributed to the more strongly perturbative interaction of Ag nanoparticles and residual Ag+ ions with macromolecular structures and proteins more specifically5456.

Despite the qualitative similarity between the C. trachcomatis and protein SERS spectra (Fig. 7), these spectral signatures can still be used to identify this STD pathogen on both metals. For example, the consistent differences in the relative SERS peak intensities for resulted in a cross-validated partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) treatment39 of the HSA, avidin and C. trachcomatis SERS spectra successfully classified these samples with 99/97% sensitivity and 98/96% specificity for Au/Ag substrates. (See Supplementary Figure S9) Furthermore, from a diagnostics perspective, protein and C. trachcomatis would be separated by the centrifugation preparation step, at least for samples prepared by this current protocol.

Biochemical distinctions evident in SERS of STD pathogens

The distinct SERS spectral signatures of these two Gram-negative bacterial STD pathogens reflect their very different “lifestyles”. All previously analyzed and observed bacterial SERS spectra are dominated by the purine metabolites of nucleotide degradation (adenine, guanine, hypoxanthine, xanthine, guanosine, uric acid, AMP) in the exogenous region of cells resulting from the rapid starvation response of bacterial cells upon being placed in pure water washes following enrichment from nutrient rich environments38,39. The absence or presence of different degradation/salvage enzymes in the known purine metabolism pathways of these organisms plays a central role in determining the bacterial specificity of these purine-based SERS signatures along with strain/species specific enzyme turnover rates, secretion kinetics, and catalytic feedback mechanisms38,39. Examination of the purine metabolic pathways for N. gonorrhoeae57 (see Figure S11) shows that enzymes required for the degradation of nucleotides resulting in adenine and guanine, but not hypoxanthine, uric acid, or xanthine, are present in this bacterial strain, consistent with the SERS spectral fitting analysis (Fig. 4). This result is also consistent with purine metabolic pathway dependence we have described previously for more than 20 other bacterial species and strains38,39. The time dependent release/appearance of these degradation products (adenine and guanine) into the extracellular region accounts for the time dependent N. gonorrhoeae SERS spectral features reported here (Figs 24, S1). Most notably the relative decrease of ~1030 cm−1 band intensity, the 731/733 cm−1 to 734/735 cm−1 (Au/Ag) blue shifts and the growth of the 960 cm−1 and ~664 cm−1 bands are all consistent with the slower appearance of the free base extracellular metabolites adenine and guanine relative to NAD+/NADH, which is shown here to be more strongly associated with the cell membrane (Fig. 6). It should be noted the NAD+ signature distinguishes the N. gonorrhoeae SERS spectra from all other bacterial SERS spectra we have thus far analyzed for molecular components38,39.

C. trachomatis is the only bacterial species we have studied that has not exhibited any purinergic components in its SERS spectrum (or a supernatant SERS spectrum). Unlike the previously studied bacterial species, C. trachomatis is an obligate intracellular pathogen that depends on the host cell for nutrient and energy supply as noted above and its purine metabolic pathway reflects its parasitic lifestyle. C. trachomatis lacks all enzymes for the de novo synthesis of AMP, the key molecule to the purine degradation pathway and is missing the genes coding for phosphoribosyl transferases, the key group of enzymes responsible for escorting degraded free bases into the exogenous cell region7,57. In other words, isolated C. trachomatis cells are unable to produce the purine metabolites via nucleotide degradation pathways and therefore, in contrast to N. gonorrhoeae and all the other bacteria we have studied via SERS, no purine metabolites contribute to its SERS spectra. The purine nucleotide metabolic pathways of these two gram negative bacteria are contrasted in Figure S11. In the absence of any of these free base purine metabolites in the pericellular region, the SERS spectrum of C. trachomatis is then dominated by the protein signature of the cell wall envelope.

Conclusion

SERS spectra of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae, the two most common bacterial STD pathogens, have been obtained for the first time and demonstrate the potential of a SERS-based platform for rapid, label and growth-free detection and identification of these causative agents. The unique SERS vibrational signatures on Au and Ag substrates distinguish these two bacteria and is the basis for this identification methodology. The ultimate time scale for a rapid SERS-based diagnostic platform will probably be dependent on the speed of the sample enrichment protocol, however, when combined with a portable instrument and an effective bacterial cell enrichment procedure, a species specific, growth-free STD diagnostic may potentially be achieved in less than one hour via a SERS-based platform. The N. gonorrhoeae SERS signature, both in the cellar suspension and its supernatant, is dominated by adenine, guanine and NAD+. The free nucleobases result from the bacterial starvation response. Thus, given the origin of these signals arising from this metabolic cellular response, live vs. dead N. gonorrhoeae cell discrimination should be possible via SERS potentially providing better real time treatment efficacy and disease prognosis than NAAT based approaches, and will be the subject of subsequent studies. In contrast, the C. trachomatis spectrum is due to proteins on the cell surface only. Interestingly, on Au substrates this cell surface vibrational signature is dominated by protein aggregates but on Ag, this aggregate spectrum is absent and only specific residue and backbone features are detected. Chlamydial loads determined by genotype-based techniques in first-void urine specimens in infected patient range from ~101 to 105 EB/mL, and ~104 EB/mL in vulvo-vaginal swabs58,59. Therefore the demonstrated diagnostic sensitivity of SERS for chlamydial EB identification (102–104 ifu/mL) falls within this range of EB concentrations in patient samples. N. gonorrheoae loads found in infected patient urine has been reported in the ~104–106 cfu/mL60. This range overlaps with the SERS sensitivity demonstrated here (~105 cfu/mL), and enrichment procedure improvements should readily allow higher N. gonorrhoeae diagnostic sensitivities to be achieved. Finally, aside from demonstrating here the potential of SERS methodology for a disease specific (STD) diagnostic platform, SERS also serves as a novel bioanalytical tool for studying bacterial real time metabolic and enzymatic processes in the extracellular and near outer cell wall regions.

Methods

SERS substrates

All SERS spectra reported here were obtained using previously developed in-situ grown, aggregated Au or Ag nanoparticle covered SiO2 substrates24. These substrates are produced by a metal ion doped sol-gel procedure resulting in small (2–15 particles) aggregates of monodispersed ~80–100 nm Au or Ag nanoparticles covering the outer layer of ~1 mm2 SiO2 substrate. Characterization of their performance for providing reproducible SERS spectra of bacteria have been described in prior reports24,32,36.

In vitro cultivation of C. trachomatis

McCoy cell line (CRL-1696, ATCC), used as the host cells for the cultivation of C. trachomatis D/UW-3/CX (VR-885, ATCC), are grown in MEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum in a humidified incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2 until 90–100% confluent. The C. trachomatis infected McCoy cells are maintained in a special medium consisting of 90 mL DMEM (Life Technologies), 10 mL fetal bovine serum and 1 μg/mL cycloheximide. Further details on C. trachomatis in vitro cultivation and harvest are described in supplementary information. Aliquots of harvested C. trachomatis were stored in Hank Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) at −80 °C.

C. trachomatis sample preparation protocols

Thawed harvested C. trachomatis cells were centrifuged (23,000 g for 4 min at 4 °C) and the HBSS supernatant removed. The resulting pellet predominantly consisted of C. trachomatis EBs with a small amount of RBs and was subsequently washed four times with 10 µL of ice-cold deionized water. The sample is centrifuged (23,000 g for 4 min at 4 °C) between washes. Any remaining RB cells are lysed and removed during the washing process. After the last wash, the EB pellet is dispersed in 5 µL of ice-cold deionized water by pipetting and vortexing.

N. gonorrhoeae growth and preparation protocols

N. gonorrhoeae (FA1090, ATCC) are grown on chocolate II agar plates with IsoVitaleX enrichment (BD). The cultivation and harvest procedure for this bacterial strain is described in detail in the supplementary information. The bacteria are washed four times with 0.5 mL ice-cold water and centrifuged at ×4500g at 4 °C between each wash. After the last wash the bacterial pellet is dispersed in 50 µL of ice-cold water by vortexing. SERS spectra were acquired from multiple growths of N. gonorrhoeae on Au and Ag substrates. More specifically, three and four growths of N. gonorrhoeae cellular suspensions on Ag and Au substrates, and the supernatant of three and two N. gonorrhoeae independent growth were obtained in total on Ag and Au substrates (Figure S4).

SERS spectral acquisition and data processing

A 1 µL sample is placed on the Au or Ag SERS substrate and air-dried for ~5 min prior to signal acquisition. All SERS spectra were acquired with an RM-2000 Renishaw Raman microscope employing a 50x objective and 785 nm excitation. Incident laser powers of ~3.3 mw and ~10 S of illumination time were used to obtain the reported bacterial SERS spectra. Typically ten spectra per sample were obtained for each experimentally reported spectrum. GRAMS/AI™ Spectroscopy Software was used to manually baseline correct the experimental SERS spectra. The illuminated Raman excitation area was ~30 μm × 6 μm. The incident fluence used for these studies is thus well below threshold for any laser tweezing effects to be evident. Peak frequency precision is ±0.5 cm−1.

A PLS toolbox (v7.3.1) from Eigenvector Research, Inc. (WA, USA) in a Matlab platform was used for the PLS-DA analysis resulting in Figure S9. For this analysis, the baseline corrected observed spectra were normalized to their peak intensity maxima and converted to barcodes, i.e. a series of “ones” or “zeroes” based on the sign of the second derivative at each wavenumber, to use as input vectors for this PLS-DA classification procedure. As demonstrated previously, this barcode procedure results in improved sensitivity and specificity relative to using spectra (or first or second derivatives) as input vectors for multivariate data analysis treatments33. Optimized PLS-DA classification performance resulted for a model which included 3/5 latent variables (LV) which corresponded to a minimum in root mean square error (RMSE). Cross-validation on the data set was accomplished by the random subset method employing 7/8 different test sets and 10/10 iterations for SERS spectra on the Au/Ag substrates.

Data availability statement

All data generated or analysed during this study included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files) are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Electronic supplementary material

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: Y.C., L.D.Z., W.R.P. Performed the experiments: Y.C. Analyzed the data: Y.C. L.D.Z. Produced SERS substrates: W.R.P. Wrote the paper: Y.C., L.D.Z.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-23562-5.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Chan PA, et al. Extragenital Infections Caused by Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A Review of the Literature. Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;2016:5758387. doi: 10.1155/2016/5758387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2015. (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, 2016).
  • 3.Cook RL, Hutchison SL, Østergaard L, Braithwaite R, Ness RB. Systematic review: Noninvasive testing for chlamydia trachomatis and neisseria gonorrhoeae. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2005;142:914–925. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-11-200506070-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pathela P, Braunstein SL, Blank S, Schillinger JA. HIV incidence among men with and those without sexually transmitted rectal infections: estimates from matching against an HIV case registry. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57:1203–1209. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Darville T. Chlamydia trachomatis infections in neonates and young children. Semin. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. 2005;16:235–244. doi: 10.1053/j.spid.2005.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Belland RJ, et al. Genomic transcriptional profiling of the developmental cycle of Chlamydia trachomatis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2003;100:8478–8483. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1331135100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stephens RS, et al. Genome Sequence of an Obligate Intracellular Pathogen of Humans: Chlamydia trachomatis. Science. 1998;282:754. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5389.754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Sexually Transmitted Infections in Europe 2013. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden (2015).
  • 9.Lee MH, et al. Disseminated Gonococcal Infection Presenting as Bacteremia and Liver Abscesses in a Healthy Adult. Infection & Chemotherapy. 2015;47:60–63. doi: 10.3947/ic.2015.47.1.60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fleming DT, Wasserheit JN. From epidemiological synergy to public health policy and practice: the contribution of other sexually transmitted diseases to sexual transmission of HIV infection. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 1999;75:3–17. doi: 10.1136/sti.75.1.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Creighton S, Tenant-Flowers M, Taylor CB, Miller R, Low N. Co-infection with gonorrhoea and chlamydia: how much is there and what does it mean? Int J STD AIDS. 2003;14:109–113. doi: 10.1258/095646203321156872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lyss SB, et al. CHlamydia trachomatis among patients infected with and treated for neisseria gonorrhoeae in sexually transmitted disease clinics in the united states. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2003;139:178–185. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-3-200308050-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Papp JR, Schachter J, Gaydos CA. & Van der Pol, B. Recommendations for the Laboratory-Based Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae-2014. Mmwr Recommendations and Reports. 2014;63:1–19. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chernesky MA, et al. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens by enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence in genital specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men and women. J Infect Dis. 1986;154:141–148. doi: 10.1093/infdis/154.1.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Alary M, et al. Evaluation of a rapid point-of-care test for the detection of gonococcal infection among female sex workers in Benin. Sex Transm Infect. 2006;82(Suppl 5):v29–32. doi: 10.1136/sti.2006.021865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gaydos CA, et al. Performance of the APTIMA Combo 2 assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in female urine and endocervical swab specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:304–309. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.1.304-309.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Meyer T. Diagnostic Procedures to Detect Chlamydia trachomatis Infections. Microorganisms. 2016;4:25. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms4030025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Whiley DM, Tapsall JW, Sloots TP. Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae: An Ongoing Challenge. The Journal of molecular diagnostics: JMD. 2006;8:3–15. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2006.050045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stiles PL, Dieringer JA, Shah NC, Van Duyne RP. Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry. 2008;1:601–626. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anchem.1.031207.112814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sharma B, Frontiera RR, Henry A-I, Ringe E, Van Duyne RP. SERS: Materials, applications, and the future. Materials Today. 2012;15:16–25. doi: 10.1016/S1369-7021(12)70017-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hering K, et al. SERS: a versatile tool in chemical and biochemical diagnostics. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2008;390:113–124. doi: 10.1007/s00216-007-1667-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Efrima S, Bronk BV. Silver colloids impregnating or coating bacteria. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1998;102:5947–5950. doi: 10.1021/jp9813903. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jarvis RM, Goodacre R. Discrimination of bacteria using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Anal Chem. 2004;76:40–47. doi: 10.1021/ac034689c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Premasiri WR, et al. Characterization of the surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) of bacteria. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109:312–320. doi: 10.1021/jp040442n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zeiri L, Bronk BV, Shabtai Y, Eichler J, Efrima S. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy as a tool for probing specific biochemical components in bacteria. Appl Spectrosc. 2004;58:33–40. doi: 10.1366/000370204322729441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kahraman M, Yazici MM, Sahin F, Bayrak OF, Culha M. Reproducible surface-enhanced Raman scattering spectra of bacteria on aggregated silver nanoparticles. Appl Spectrosc. 2007;61:479–485. doi: 10.1366/000370207780807731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chu H, Huang Y, Zhao Y. Silver nanorod arrays as a surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrate for foodborne pathogenic bacteria detection. Appl. Spectrosc. 2008;62:922–931. doi: 10.1366/000370208785284330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jarvis RM, Goodacre R. Characterisation and identification of bacteria using SERS. Chemical Society Reviews. 2008;37:931–936. doi: 10.1039/b705973f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhou H, et al. SERS Detection of Bacteria in Water by in Situ Coating with Ag Nanoparticles. Analytical Chemistry. 2014;86:1525–1533. doi: 10.1021/ac402935p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sivanesan A, et al. Nanostructured silver-gold bimetallic SERS substrates for selective identification of bacteria in human blood. Analyst. 2014;139:1037–1043. doi: 10.1039/c3an01924a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Premasiri, W. R., Moir, D. T. & Ziegler, L. D. Vibrational Fingerprinting of Bacterial Pathogens by Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering. SPIE5795 (2005).
  • 32.Premasiri, W. R., Moir, D. T., Klempner, M. S. & Ziegler, L. D. In New Approaches in Biomedical Spectroscopy (eds K. Kneipp, R. Aroca, H. Kneipp, & E. Wentrup-Byrne) 164 (Oxford University Press, 2007).
  • 33.Patel IS, Premasiri WR, Moir DT, Ziegler LD. Barcoding bacterial cells: A SERS based methodology for pathogen identification. J Raman Spectrosc. 2008;39:1660–1672. doi: 10.1002/jrs.2064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Premasiri WR, Gebregziabher Y, Ziegler LD. On the Difference Between Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) Spectra of Cell Growth Media and Whole Bacterial Cells. Applied Spectroscopy. 2011;65:493–499. doi: 10.1366/10-06173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Premasiri, W. R., Sauer-Budge, A. F., Lee, J. C., Klapperich, C. M. & Ziegler, L. D. Rapid bacterial diagnostics via surface enhanced Raman microscopy. Spectroscopy, 40–49 (2012). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 36.Ranjith Premasiri, W., Lemler, P., Chen, Y., Gebregziabher, Y. & Ziegler, L. D. SERS Analysis of Bacteria, Human Blood, and Cancer Cells: a Metabolomic and Diagnostic Tool. Frontiers of Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering: Single Nanoparticles and Single Cells, 257–283 (2014).
  • 37.Boardman AK, et al. Rapid Detection of Bacteria from Blood with Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Analytical Chemistry. 2016;88:8026–8035. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Premasiri WR, et al. The biochemical origins of the surface-enhanced Raman spectra of bacteria: a metabolomics profiling by SERS. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2016;408:4631–4647. doi: 10.1007/s00216-016-9540-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Premasiri WR, et al. Rapid urinary tract infection diagnostics by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS): identification and antibiotic susceptibilities. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2017;409:3043–3054. doi: 10.1007/s00216-017-0244-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yue KT, et al. Raman spectroscopy of oxidized and reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotides. Biochemistry. 1986;25:4941–4947. doi: 10.1021/bi00365a033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ozaki, Y., Kneipp, K. & Aroca, R. Frontiers of surface-enhanced raman scattering: single-nanoparticles and single cells. (Wiley, 2014).
  • 42.Johnston KH, Gotschlich EC. Isolation and Characterization of the Outer Membrane of Neisseriagonorrhoeae. J. Bacteriol. 1974;119:250–257. doi: 10.1128/jb.119.1.250-257.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Seib KL, et al. Defenses against Oxidative Stress in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a System Tailored for a ChallengingEnvironment. Microbio, Mol. Bio. Rev. 2006;70:344–361. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00044-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tanzer RJ, Hatch TP. Characterization of Outer Membrane Proteins in Chlamydia trachomatis LGV Serovar L2. J. Bacteriol. 2001;183:2686–2690. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.8.2686-2690.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hatch T. Chlamydia: Old Ideas Crushed, New Mysteries Bared. Science. 1998;282:638. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5389.638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Stephens RS, Lammel CJ. Chlamydia outer membrane protein discovery using genomics. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2001;4:16–20. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5274(00)00158-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Liu X, Afrane M, Clemmer DE, Zhong G, Nelson DE. Identification of Chlamydia trachomatis Outer Membrane Complex Proteins by Differential Proteomics. Journal of Bacteriology. 2010;192:2852–2860. doi: 10.1128/JB.01628-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Han XX, Huang GG, Zhao B, Ozaki Y. Label-Free Highly Sensitive Detection of Proteins in Aqueous Solutions Using Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. Analytical Chemistry. 2009;81:3329–3333. doi: 10.1021/ac900395x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kurouski D, Postiglione T, Deckert-Gaudig T, Deckert V, Lednev IK. Amide I vibrational mode suppression in surface (SERS) and tip (TERS) enhanced Raman spectra of protein specimens. The Analyst. 2013;138:1665–1673. doi: 10.1039/c2an36478f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Podstawka E, Ozaki Y, Proniewicz LM. Adsorption of S—S Containing Proteins on a Colloidal Silver Surface Studied by Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Applied Spectroscopy. 2004;58:1147–1156. doi: 10.1366/0003702042336073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Drachev VP, Thoreson MD, Khaliullin EN, Davisson VJ, Shalaev VM. Surface-Enhanced Raman Difference between Human Insulin and Insulin Lispro Detected with Adaptive Nanostructures. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2004;108:18046–18052. doi: 10.1021/jp047254h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhang D, et al. Gold Nanoparticles Can Induce the Formation of Protein-based Aggregates at Physiological pH. Nano Letters. 2009;9:666–671. doi: 10.1021/nl803054h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mahler H-C, Friess W, Grauschopf U, Kiese S. Protein aggregation: Pathways, induction factors and analysis. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2009;98:2909–2934. doi: 10.1002/jps.21566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Foldbjerg R, et al. Silver nanoparticles - wolves in sheep’s clothing? Toxicology Research. 2015;4:563–575. doi: 10.1039/C4TX00110A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Austin LA, Kang B, Yen C-W, El-Sayed MA. Nuclear Targeted Silver Nanospheres Perturb the Cancer Cell Cycle Differently than those of Nanogold. Bioconjugate chemistry. 2011;22:2324–2331. doi: 10.1021/bc200386m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Marambio-Jones C, Hoek EMV. A review of the antibacterial effects of silver nanomaterials and potential implications for human health and the environment. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2010;12:1531–1551. doi: 10.1007/s11051-010-9900-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kanehisa, M. KEGG purine metabolism pathways, http://www.genome.jp/kegg/pathway/map/map00230.html (1995).
  • 58.Wiggins R, Graf S, Low N, Horner PJ. & for the Chlamydia Screening Studies Study, G. Real-Time Quantitative PCR To Determine Chlamydial Load in Men and Women in a Community Setting. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2009;47:1824–1829. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00005-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Blocker ME, Krysiak RG, Behets F, Cohen MS, Hobbs MM. Quantification of Chlamydia trachomatis Elementary Bodies in Urine by Ligase Chain Reaction. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2002;40:3631–3634. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.10.3631-3634.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Priest D, et al. &lt;em&gt;Neisseria gonorrhoeae&lt;/em&gt; DNA bacterial load in men with symptomatic and asymptomatic gonococcal urethritis. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2017;93:478. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2016-052950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analysed during this study included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files) are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES