ABSTRACT
Here, we report the draft genome of the Enterobacter cloacae strain amazonensis, a bacterium highly resistant to mercury that was isolated from a metal- and sewage-contaminated stream in Amazonas, Brazil. The exploration of the 5.0-Mb genome revealed 104 genes encoding resistance to toxic compounds and heavy metals, highlighting the potential biotechnological applications of this strain.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
In the Brazilian Amazon, as an outcome of extensive gold mining, it is estimated that 2000 to 3000 tons of mercury (Hg) was released into the environment (1). Environmental bacteria, evolved from polluted landscapes, encode proteins executing a range of genetic programs to adapt and survive the toxic impact of heavy metals on their metabolism (2, 3). Prospecting for new molecular mechanisms from Amazonian environmental bacteria may provide a powerful informational resource that can lead to novel technologies. To this end, we report here the draft genome of the Enterobacter cloacae strain amazonensis, isolated from a metal- and sewage-contaminated stream named Igarapé do 40 (3.132168S, 60.000696W) in Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
Enterobacter cloacae strains are a highly diverse group of Gram-negative Proteobacteria belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae (4), which colonize various environments (5–8). For our purposes, we screened urban stream samples for heavy metal tolerance behavior. The amazonensis strain demonstrated a high level of mercury resistance and the ability to tolerate up to 200 mg/liter HgCl2 (data not shown), paving the way for potential bioremediation and biotechnological applications of this strain.
We conducted genomic DNA extraction by applying the standard phenol-chloroform method (9). Quality and concentration were verified by Nanodrop and Qubit, respectively. DNA libraries were constructed with qualified DNA through the end-repairing process. We performed sequencing with Illumina QTE HiSeq technology, producing 1 Gb of paired-end reads. Low-quality reads and sequencing adapters were removed using Trimmomatic 0.32 (10). From 1 Gb of data sequencing and 5,629,730 reads, Velvet 1.2.10 (11) and CAP3 (12) were used to perform de novo genome assembly, generating a draft genome of 5.0 Mb in 69 contigs. Comparing our draft genome with its reference (13), it presented 90.25% of the size. The estimated N50 value and G+C content were 327,446 and 53.1%, respectively.
For annotation purposes, we applied Prokka 1.12 (14) software and the RAST web server (15), revealing that the E. cloacae amazonensis genome is composed of 579 subsystems and 4,780 coding sequences, 95 of them for RNAs. Toward heavy-metal metabolism, E. cloacae amazonensis presents 104 genes encoding several molecular tools, such as resistance to arsenic, copper, cobalt, zinc, cadmium, mercury, copper, and chromium. The strain displays distinct genes related to mercury detoxification machinery (merR, merT, merP, merA, merE, merC, and merD) and, interestingly, the genome has two copies of the mercuric reductase gene (merA), which encodes a key enzyme. In a bacterium that is tolerant of a metal-contaminated environment, the duplication of such genetic information may impact the highly Hg-resistant behavior.
Accession number(s).
This whole-genome shotgun project is available at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number PZPP00000000. The version described here is version PZPP01000000.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by FAPEAM, CNPq, and CAPES.
Footnotes
Citation Astolfi MCT, Carvalho EBDS, de Barros AM, Pinto MV, de Lacerda LB, Nogueira VB, Lopes EF, Astolfi-Filho S. 2018. Draft genome sequence of the novel Enterobacter cloacae strain amazonensis, a highly heavy metal-resistant bacterium from a contaminated stream in Amazonas, Brazil. Genome Announc 6:e00450-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00450-18.
REFERENCES
- 1.Malm O. 1998. Gold mining as a source of mercury exposure in the Brazilian Amazon. Environ Res 77:73–78. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1998.3828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hemme CL, Deng Y, Gentry TJ, Fields MW, Wu L, Barua S, Barry K, Tringe SG, Watson DB, He Z, Hazen TC, Tiedje JM, Rubin EM, Zhou J. 2010. Metagenomic insights into evolution of a heavy metal-contaminated groundwater microbial community. ISME J 4:660–672. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2009.154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Permina EA, Kazakov AE, Kalinina OV, Gelfand MS. 2006. Comparative genomics of regulation of heavy metal resistance in Eubacteria. BMC Microbiol 6:49. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-6-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Paauw A, Caspers MPM, Schuren FHJ, Leverstein-van Hall MA, Delétoile A, Montijn RC, Verhoef J, Fluit AC. 2008. Genomic diversity within the Enterobacter cloacae complex. PLoS One 3:e3018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Suriya J, Bharathiraja S, Rajasekaran R. 2013. Biosorption of heavy metals by biomass of Enterobacter cloacae isolated from metal-polluted soils. Int J ChemTech Res 5:1329–1338. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rattray EAS, Prosser JI, Glover LA, Killham K. 1995. Characterization of rhizosphere colonization by luminescent Enterobacter cloacae at the population and single-cell levels. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:2950–2957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Keller R, Pedroso MZ, Ritchmann R, Silva RM. 1998. Occurrence of virulence-associated properties in Enterobacter cloacae. Infect Immun 66:645–649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Davin-Regli A, Pagès J-M. 2015. Enterobacter aerogenes and Enterobacter cloacae; versatile bacterial pathogens confronting antibiotic treatment. Front Microbiol 6:1–10. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 18:821–829. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Huang X, Madan A. 1999. CAP3: a DNA sequence assembly program. Genome Res 9:868–877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ren Y, Ren Y, Zhou Z, Guo X, Li Y, Feng L, Wang L. 2010. Complete genome sequence of Enterobacter cloacae subsp. cloacae type strain ATCC 13047. J Bacteriol 192:2463–2464. doi: 10.1128/JB.00067-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
