Skip to main content
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
. 2018 May 25;9:684. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00684

Stable QTLs for Plant Height on Chromosome A09 Identified From Two Mapping Populations in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

Jianwei Lv 1,2,3,, Nian Liu 1,, Jianbin Guo 1, Zhijun Xu 3, Xinping Li 1, Zhendong Li 1, Huaiyong Luo 1, Xiaoping Ren 1, Li Huang 1, Xiaojing Zhou 1, Yuning Chen 1, Weigang Chen 1, Yong Lei 1, Jinxing Tu 2, Huifang Jiang 1, Boshou Liao 1,*
PMCID: PMC5982159  PMID: 29887872

Abstract

The peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is an important grain legume extensively cultivated worldwide, supplying edible oil and protein for human consumption. As in many other crops, plant height is a crucial factor in determining peanut architecture traits and has a unique effect on resistance to lodging and efficiency of mechanized harvesting as well as yield. Currently, the genetic basis underlying plant height remains unclear in peanut, which have hampered marker-assisted selection in breeding. In this study, we conducted a quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis for peanut plant height by using two recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations including “Yuanza 9102 × Xuzhou 68-4 (YX)” and “Xuhua 13 × Zhonghua 6 (XZ)”. In the YX population, 38 QTLs including 10 major QTLs from 9 chromosomes were detected in 4 environments, and 8 consensus QTLs integrated by meta-analysis expressed stably across multiple environments. In the XZ population, 3 major QTLs and seven minor QTLs from 6 chromosomes were detected across 3 environments. Generally, most major QTLs from the two populations were located on pseudomolecule chromosome 9 of Arachis duranesis (A09), indicating there would be key genes on A09 controlling plant height. Further analysis revealed that qPHA09.1a from the XZ population and one consensus QTL, cqPHA09.d from the YX population were co-localized in a reliable 3.4 Mb physical interval on A09, which harbored 161 genes including transcription factors and enzymes related to signaling transduction and cell wall formation. The major and stable QTLs identified in this study may be useful for further gene cloning and identification of molecular markers applicable for breeding.

Keywords: QTL analysis, plant height, meta-analysis, cultivated peanut, RIL population

Introduction

The cultivated peanut or groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) is one of the most important oilseed and cash crops worldwide and is a crucial source of edible oil and protein for human consumption. It is widely cultivated in several tropical and sub-tropical regions, with a global harvest area of 26.54 million ha and a production of 42.32 million tons (FAOSTAT, 2014). Currently, China, India and the USA are among the top peanut producing countries in the world. The peanut production in China in 2015 was 16.44 million ton, ranking the first in the world and the first among domestic oil crops in China (http://zzys.agri.gov.cn/nongqing.aspx). For most crops, plant height is an important architecture trait largely affecting photosynthesis efficiency and resistance to lodging (Falster and Westoby, 2003; Salas Fernandez et al., 2009; Sarlikioti et al., 2011). Previous studies have shown a statistically significant correlation between plant height and yield-related traits in peanut (Jiang et al., 2014; Huang et al., 2015). In addition, lodging due to too long of a main stem could reduce yield and make the mechanized harvest of peanuts more difficult. The aim in peanut breeding is therefore cultivation of varieties with desirable plant height that facilitates mechanized harvest and increases final yield. Thus, understanding the genetic inheritance pattern of plant height is key to a knowledge-based improvement of plant height.

Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis is a useful approach to dissect the complicate quantitative trait, and dozen of additive and epistatic QTLs for plant height have been identified in major cereal crops (Zhang et al., 2006, 2017; Wu et al., 2010; Cui et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2014; Han et al., 2017). Of them, major genes/loci such as Rht-B1b and Rht-D1b in wheat, and sd1 in rice were well characterized and widely used in breeding programs (Peng et al., 1999; Sasaki et al., 2002; Asano et al., 2007; Würschum et al., 2015). Map-based cloning and functional analyses were shown that several QTL genes involve in biogenesis or signal transduction of gibberellin acid, brassinosteroids and strigolactones to regulate plant height (Ikeda et al., 2001; Sasaki et al., 2002; Zou et al., 2005; Tong et al., 2012; Teng et al., 2013; Wilhelm et al., 2013). As to peanut, the genetic basis of controlling plant height remains currently unclear, although there is a great diversity in the plant height of germplasm collections of both cultivated species and wild Arachis accessions.

Currently, many QTL mapping studies using bi-parental population have been conducted to identify QTLs for pod- or seed-related traits, oil quality, and resistance to biotic stresses such as rust, late leaf spot and Meloidogyne arenaria in peanut (Pandey et al., 2014, 2016; Varshney et al., 2014; Leal-Bertioli et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 2016; Luo et al., 2017a,b). While limited efforts have been made to detect QTLs associated with plant height in peanut. Shirasawa et al. (2012) first identified 3 QTLs with 4.8–19.2% phenotypic variation explained for plant height in 94 F2 lines. Similarly, another three QTLs with interval distances of 8.1–16.8 cM were identified based on an F2:3 mapping population (Huang et al., 2015). However, all QTLs from these two reports were detected in a single environment. More recently, our lab reported 18 QTLs for plant height in an RIL population and found that two consensus QTLs on linkage group (LG) A04 performed stably across environments (Huang et al., 2016). Li et al. (2017) subsequently identified three other consistently expressed QTLs with interval distances of 5.97–6.71 cM across multiple environments in a single RIL population.

From previous studies, only a few QTLs with stable performance across environments were identified. However, no major QTLs detected in one specific population could be valid in other populations with different genetic backgrounds indicating that these QTLs were less meaningful in peanut breeding. To overcome this problem, two peanut RIL populations were constructed and used in this study to identify robust QTLs controlling plant height with stable performance across multiple environments and explore their potential in marker-assisted selection breeding.

Materials and methods

Plant materials and field trials

Two RIL populations were developed from two crosses, Yuanza 9102 × Xuzhou 68-4 and Xuhua 13 × Zhonghua 6, through the single seed decent method. Yuanza 9102, the female parent of the YX population, belonging to A. hypogaea subsp. fastigiata var. vulgaris, was derived from interspecific hybridization between cultivated cultivar Baisha 1016 and a diploid wild species A. diogoi. Xuzhou 68-4, the male parent, which belongs to A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea, had significantly higher plant height than the female parent Yuanza 9102. Xuhua 13, the female parent of the XZ population, belongs to A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea. Zhonghua 6, the male parent of the XZ population, belongs to A. hypogaea subsp. fastigiata var. vulgaris. The height of Xuhua 13 is slightly higher than Zhonghua 6.

Two mapping populations, consisting of 195 (YX) and 188 (XZ) lines, were used to generate genotypic data for QTL analysis in this study. The two populations with their parents were planted in the experimental station of OCRI-CAAS, Wuhan, China. For the YX population, the trials of four consecutive years from 2013 to 2016 were named as YX2013, YX2014, YX2015, and YX2016. For the XZ population, the trials from 2014 to 2016 were named as XZ2014, XZ2015, and XZ2016. Field trials were performed on a randomized complete block design with three replications. Each plot contained 12 plants in one row, with 20 cm between plants and 30 cm between rows. According to a described standard method, at least 8 of the 12 plants were selected to record plant height through measuring the length from base of the above-ground plant to the tip of the main stem (Huang et al., 2016). All field management followed standard agricultural practices.

Statistical analysis of phenotypic data

The phenotypic data of plant height trait was analyzed by IBM SPASS Statistics software (2013). The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess the normal distribution of phenotypic data in each year. The univariate variance analysis was performed through standard GLM method, and restricted maximum likelihood method was used to evaluate variance components. The broad-sense heritability was calculated based on the following formula:  H2= σg2/(σg2+σg×e2/r+σe2/rn), where σg2 is the genotypic variance among RILs, σg×e2 is the variance of interaction between genotype and environment, σe2 is the residual variance, r is the number of trial environments and n is the number of replications in each environment (Holl et al., 2010).

QTL mapping and meta-analysis

Genome-wide QTL mapping was performed using the composite interval mapping (CIM) method through QTL Cartographer 2.5 software (Zeng, 1994). By 1,000 times permutation with P < 0.05, the LOD thresholds for plant height were 3.5, 3.3, 3.2, and 3.4 in the 2013–2016 trials of YX population, and 3.4, 3.4, and 3.3 in 2014–2016 trials of the XZ population. The walk speed, control marker and window size were set as 1, 5, and 10 cM respectively. The QTLs which had phenotypic variation explained more than 10% were considered as major QTLs, otherwise considered as minor QTLs. According to previously described nomenclature (Udall et al., 2006), QTLs were designated with an initial letter “q” followed by the abbreviation of trait name “PH” and the corresponding linkage group. After linkage group, codes 1, 2, 3, and 4 were added representing the 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016 trials of the YX population respectively, and codes 1, 2, and 3 were added after linkage group representing 2014, 2015, and 2016 trials of XZ population respectively. If more than one QTL was identified in the same linkage group and same year, an alphabetical letter was added after the code. For instance, if two QTLs associated with plant height were identified on LGA09 of YX population in 2013, they were named as qPHA09.1a and qPHA09.1b.

QTLs identified from different environments but located in the same linkage were subjected to the meta analysis to estimate the position of consistent QTL through BioMercator 2.1 software (Goffinet and Gerber, 2000; Arcade et al., 2004). The consistent QTLs were designated with an initial letter “cq” followed by the trait name and linkage group. An alphabetical letter was added after the linkage group if more than one consistent QTL was located there.

Gene annotation in co-localized region

Through blast search, markers linked to QTLs were located in the genome of diploid species which are regarded as the ancestors of the cultivated peanut (Bertioli et al., 2016). The corresponding genes sequence and transcript abundance were downloaded from PeanutBase (Bertioli et al., 2016) and Arachis eFP Browser (Clevenger et al., 2016), respectively. GO analysis and KEGG analysis were performed using the software Blast2GO (Conesa et al., 2005).

Results

Phenotypic variation in plant height

The plant height trait was recorded in both the YX and XZ populations. In the YX population, a significant difference was found between the two parental genotypes and among the RILs (Table 1). The plant height of the female parent (Yuanza 9102) ranged from 29.22 to 34.57 cm, whereas the height of the male parent (Xuzhou 68-4) varied from 46.85 to 58.14 cm in four environments. The phenotypic variation in the RILs varied from 25.80 to 74.38, 25.80 to 61.50, 28.40 to 60.30, and 26.70 to 48.70 cm in the four environments. A significant variation was also observed in the RILs of the XZ population across three environments (Table 1), ranging from 28.00 to 66.70, 21.86 to 61.54, and 17.68 to 51.41 cm. However, the plant heights of the two parents (Xuhua 13 and Zhonghua 6) in the XZ population were similar across multiple environments. Generally, the phenotypic data for both populations showed continuous distributions with transgressive segregation (Figure 1). The Shapiro-Wilk (w) normality test further indicated that phenotypic data from the XZ population across multiple environments and phenotypic data from the YX population in 2016 were normally distributed (Table 1). Two-way analysis of variance revealed that genetic and environmental factors could significantly influence plant height in both populations, and genotype × environment interactions could also significantly influence the phenotype in the YX population (Table 2). The broad sense heritability of plant height was estimated to be 0.81 for the YX population and 0.89 for the XZ population, indicating plant height was mainly controlled by genetic factors in both populations.

Table 1.

Descriptive statistical analysis for plant height (cm) in two RIL populations.

Pop Env P1 P2 Range(cm) Mean(cm) SD Kurt Skew w(Sig)
YX YX2013 29.22 53.50 25.80–74.38 42.09 8.16 −0.38 0.41 0.98 (0.005)
YX2014 34.57 58.14 25.80–61.50 41.55 6.47 0.03 0.47 0.98 (0.013)
YX2015 32.62 46.85 28.40–60.30 41.04 5.75 0.78 0.77 0.96 (0.000)
YX2016 32.50 47.85 26.70–48.70 35.14 4.17 0.01 0.29 0.99 (0.088)
XZ XZ2014 32.64 31.63 28.00–66.70 44.00 7.38 0.22 0.30 0.99 (0.162)
XZ2015 34.00 37.25 21.86–61.54 38.24 7.02 0.34 0.37 0.99 (0.192)
XZ2016 35.83 42.38 17.68–51.41 33.29 5.91 0.07 0.26 0.99 (0.429)

Pop, population; Env, environment; P1, female parent; P2, male parent; SD, standard deviation; Kurt, kurtosis; Skew, skewness; w, Shariro-Wilk statistic value; Sig, significance; YX, “Yuanza9102 × Xuzhou 68-4”RIL population; XZ, “Xuhua 13 × Zhonghua 6” RIL population.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Phenotype distribution of plant height in two RIL populations. The y-axis represents frequency; the x-axis represents value of plant height. YX “Yuanza9102 × Xuzhou 68-4” RIL population, XZ “Xuhua 13 × Zhonghua 6” RIL population. Red and blue arrows denote female and male parents, respectively.

Table 2.

Two-way ANOVA of variance for plant height in two RIL populations across multiple environments.

Population Source df Sum of square Mean square F-value P-value
YX Genotype 194 31,363.47 161.67 11.35 < 0.001
Environment 3 11,021.13 3673.71 258.00 < 0.001
Genotype × Environment 578 17,812.32 30.82 2.16 < 0.001
Error 585 8,329.96 14.24
XZ Genotype 186 31,449.29 169.08 8.61 < 0.001
Environment 2 14,262.94 7,131.47 363.25 < 0.001
Genotype × Environment 370 6,389.14 17.27 0.88 0.89
Error 360 7,067.75 19.63

YX, “Yuanza9102 × Xuzhou 68-4” RIL population; XZ,“Xuhua 13 × Zhonghua 6” RIL population.

Identification of QTLs for plant height

The genetic linkage maps of the YX population and the XZ population have previously been constructed in our lab (Luo et al., 2017b,c). For the YX population, the genetic map contained 830 loci spanning 1,386.2 cM, which were assigned to 20 linkage groups designated as A01–A10 for A subgenome and B01-B10 for B subgenome. Length of LGs varied from 13.8 to 125.0 cM possessing 3–110 marker loci. For XZ population, 817 polymorphic markers were successfully mapped on 20 LGs which varied from 34.3 to 134.7 cM and contained 7 to 97 marker loci. The genetic map spanned 1756.5 cM with a map density of 2.2 cM per loci.

Genome-wide analyses were performed using the genetic maps and phenotypic data of plant height from RILs of the two populations. In total, 48 QTLs with 3.99–26.27% phenotypic variation explained (PVE) associated with plant height were detected in two populations across multiple environments (Table 3, Figure 2). For the YX population, eight QTLs including five major QTLs, namely, qPHA09.1a, qPHA09.1b, qPHA09.1c, qPHA09.1d, and qPHB05.1b, explaining 7.78–26.27% of the phenotypic variation, were identified in the 2013 trial. In the 2014 trial, two major QTLs, qPHA09.2c and qPHB05.2b, and 14 minor QTLs were detected with 3.99–12.85% PVEs. Only five QTLs with 4.64–9.18% PVEs were identified in the 2015 trial. In addition, six minor QTLs and three major QTLs, qPHA09.4a, qPHA09.4b, and qPHB05.4b were detected in the 2016 trial, explaining 4.83–24.74% of the phenotypic variations.

Table 3.

QTLs of plant height were detected in two populations across multiple environments.

Population Environment LG QTL Position(cM) LOD CI (cM) Additive effect PVE (%)
YX 2013 A09 qPHA09.1a 21.01 11.27 20.70–21.20 3.68 19.67
2013 A09 qPHA09.1b 24.91 16.34 24.50–25.00 4.18 25.73
2013 A09 qPHA09.1c 26.91 16.72 26.60–27.00 4.21 26.27
2013 A09 qPHA09.1d 33.91 11.59 32.90–41.40 3.96 23.22
2013 B03 qPHB03.1a 44.71 6.89 41.90–52.20 2.48 9.13
2013 B05 qPHB05.1a 39.91 5.88 39.60–40.20 2.54 8.53
2013 B05 qPHB05.1b 47.41 9.12 46.80–47.80 3.30 12.49
2013 B05 qPHB05.1c 54.91 5.46 54.10–56.10 2.49 7.78
2014 A01 qPHA01.2a 0.01 4.51 0.00–1.70 1.51 4.90
2014 A01 qPHA01.2b 32.71 3.64 31.40–33.80 1.34 3.99
2014 A05 qPHA05.2a 83.71 4.42 82.90–86.40 1.48 4.84
2014 A09 qPHA09.2a 21.01 6.30 19.90–22.10 1.94 8.33
2014 A09 qPHA09.2b 26.91 7.09 26.60–27.40 2.04 9.32
2014 A09 qPHA09.2c 29.41 7.95 29.00–29.60 2.12 10.25
2014 A09 qPHA09.2d 33.91 4.52 31.30–34.90 1.93 8.17
2014 B02 qPHB02.2a 57.31 3.83 56.50–59.00 1.39 4.17
2014 B03 qPHB03.2a 40.91 7.79 33.80–44.30 2.15 9.96
2014 B04 qPHB04.2a 49.71 4.88 47.80–49.90 1.85 6.27
2014 B04 qPHB04.2b 51.71 5.42 51.30–52.00 1.95 6.79
2014 B04 qPHB04.2c 55.51 4.64 55.00–56.00 1.74 5.86
2014 B05 qPHB05.2a 70.81 5.27 69.30–71.40 1.85 6.92
2014 B05 qPHB05.2b 80.31 7.71 80.00–81.80 2.49 12.85
2014 B08 qPHB08.2a 16.81 4.19 13.40–19.50 1.51 4.68
2014 B08 qPHB08.2b 22.11 4.45 21.10–24.90 1.64 5.51
2015 A05 qPHA05.3a 86.41 4.50 84.10–86.90 1.54 6.88
2015 A05 qPHA05.3b 91.21 4.67 90.30–91.30 1.64 7.97
2015 A09 qPHA09.3a 24.51 3.08 23.40–25.20 1.29 4.64
2015 B08 qPHB08.3a 9.01 4.03 1.10–13.40 1.77 9.18
2015 B08 qPHB08.3b 21.11 5.85 19.50–22.80 1.76 8.96
2016 A05 qPHA05.4a 93.51 3.83 92.50–98.80 0.97 5.10
2016 A09 qPHA09.4a 21.21 13.15 20.60–21.40 2.03 22.28
2016 A09 qPHA09.4b 24.41 14.97 24.10–24.50 2.13 24.74
2016 A09 qPHA09.4c 27.71 4.26 27.40–28.10 1.41 6.23
2016 B05 qPHB05.4a 56.11 6.03 54.40–56.40 1.35 8.37
2016 B05 qPHB05.4b 60.01 7.57 59.30–60.70 1.45 10.31
2016 B10 qPHB10.4a 49.11 3.59 48.60–49.50 −0.94 4.83
2016 B10 qPHB10.4b 55.81 4.50 55.50–56.20 −1.05 5.96
2016 B10 qPHB10.4c 62.31 3.67 61.70–64.30 −0.96 4.92
XZ 2014 A09 qPHA09.1a 34.91 3.73 29.80–36.10 2.04 7.52
2014 B10 qPHB10.1a 86.61 3.42 83.20–108.20 −1.88 6.41
2015 A05 qPHA05.2a 89.21 4.29 87.90–89.50 2.02 8.16
2015 B04 qPHB04.2a 15.81 5.11 9.80–18.10 2.50 11.97
2015 B04 qPHB04.2b 22.11 5.64 18.10–25.40 2.53 12.03
2016 A09 qPHA09.3a 37.41 5.51 36.40–38.40 1.95 10.63
2016 A09 qPHA09.3b 42.91 5.50 42.10–45.40 1.90 9.91
2016 B03 qPHB03.3a 37.01 3.59 34.90–40.60 −1.75 8.60
2016 B03 qPHB03.3b 51.31 3.88 50.90–52.30 −1.57 6.91
2016 B08 qPHB08.3a 1.01 3.70 0.00–6.00 −1.54 6.73

YX,“Yuanza9102 × Xuzhou 68-4” RIL population; XZ, “Xuhua 13 × Zhonghua 6” RIL population; LG, linkage group; LOD, logarithm of odds; CI, 2-LOD confidence interval; PVE, phenotypic variation explained.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Distribution of QTLs for plant height in the genetic map of the YX population. Consistent QTLs obtained through meta-analysis are highlighted in red color on bars of linkage groups. A dashed box denotes a hot spot QTL region. YX “Yuanza9102 × Xuzhou 68-4” RIL population.

In total, 38 QTLs including 10 major QTLs were identified in four environments and mapped on nine LGs in YX population (Table 3, Figure 2). Of the 38 QTLs, 12 were detected in approximately 20 cM interval on LGA09, indicating there was a QTL cluster on LGA09. Interestingly, most major QTLs (7/10) with 10.25–26.27% PVE and 7.95–16.72 LOD were also located in the QTL cluster on LGA09, suggesting that LGA09 was most likely rich in key genes controlling plant height (Table 3, Figure 2). To further explore stable QTLs controlling plant height, meta-analysis was conducted to integrate QTLs detected in the four environments. Finally, eight consistent QTLs, which could be repeatedly detected in at least two environments, were identified on LGA09, LGA05, LGB03, LGB05, and LGB08 (Table 4, Figure 2). Especially on LGA09, four consistent QTLs, cqPHA09.a, cqPHA09.b, cqPHA09.c, and cqPHA09.d, located from 21.04 to 33.90 cM, in order, explained 8.33–22.28, 4.64–25.73, 9.32–26.27, and 8.17–23.22% of the phenotypic variation, respectively. In addition, four other consistent QTLs, cqPHA05, cpPHB03, cpPHB05 and cpPHB08, explained 4.84–6.88, 9.13–9.96, 7.78–8.37, and 5.51–8.96% phenotypic variation, respectively.

Table 4.

Consensus QTLs of plant height through meta-analysis in multiple environments.

Consensus QTL LG Position (cM) CI (cM) Consistent QTLs
cqPHA05 A05 85.54 84.55–86.53 qPHA05.2a, qPHA05.3a
cqPHA09.a A09 21.04 20.87–21.22 qPHA09.1a, qPHA09.2a, qPHA09.4a
cqPHA09.b A09 24.60 24.44–24.75 qPHA09.1b, qPHA09.3a, qPHA09.4b
cqPHA09.c A09 26.91 26.73–27.08 qPHA09.1c, qPHA09.2b
cqPHA09.d A09 33.90 32.25–35.56 qPHA09.1d, qPHA09.2d
cqPHB03 B03 42.84 39.17–46.52 qPHB03.1a, qPHB03.2a
cqPHB05 B05 55.51 54.80–56.21 qPHB05.1c, qPHB05.4a
cqPHB08 B08 21.53 20.29–22.78 qPHB08.2b, qPHB08.3b

LG, linkage group; CI, confidence interval.

For the XZ population, 10 QTLs including three major QTLs with more than 10% PVE were detected in three environments (Table 3, Figure 3). In the 2014 trial, two QTLs, namely, qPHA09.1a and qPHB10.1a, were identified, explaining 6.41–7.52% of the phenotypic variation. In the 2015 trial, three QTLs, including two major QTLs, qPHB04.2a and qPHB04.2b, and a minor QTL, namely, qPHA05.2a, were detected with a range of 8.16–12.03% PVE. Four minor QTLs namely, qPHA09.3b, qPHB03.3a, qPHB03.3b and qPHB08.3a, and a major QTL, qPHA09.3a, were identified in the 2016 trial, explaining 6.73–10.63% PVE. In total, 10 QTLs were located on six LGs. Three QTLs were located in approximately 15 cM interval on LGA09 with 7.52–10.63% PVE, indicating this region may harbor genes in controlling plant height. In addition, six QTLs from three LGs had positive additive effects, indicating that the alleles increasing plant height are from male parent (Zhonghua 6). However, four other QTLs had negative additive effects, which demonstrated that the female parent also had alleles for increasing plant height. These loci controlling plant height could be recombined in the progeny. Thus, it was observed that parents did not differ much in terms of plant height, but the phenotypic data of the RIL population (XZ) was significantly different (Table 1).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Distribution of QTLs for plant height in the genetic map of XZ population. Dashed box denoted hot spot QTL region. XZ “Xuhua 13 × Zhonghua 6” RIL population.

A hot spot of QTLs for plant height on chromosome A09

Comparing the QTLs identified in the two populations, we found that LGA05, A09, B03, B04, B08, and B10 harbored QTLs in both populations (Table 3). However, common markers linked to the detected QTLs between the YX and XZ populations were only found on LGA09 (Supplemental Figure 1). In the YX population, there was a QTL cluster, which could be integrated into four repeated detectable QTLs on LGA09 covering an approximately 20 cM interval. For the XZ population, LGA09 also harbored three QTLs in a 15 cM interval. In total, there were 11 common markers, AhTE0726, AHGS1543, AHGS1126, AGGS0957, AGGS1606, AHGS2130, AGGS2492, Ad09A6425, AGGS2572, Ad09A3779, and AGGS2438, between the two intervals on LGA09 from different genetic maps, indicating that there is a hot spot of QTLs for plant height on chromosome A09. Then we produced an integrated map of LGA09, and found that QTLs for plant height from the YX and XZ population were co-localized in the same interval in the integrated map, further verifying that chromosome A09 is rich in genes controlling plant height (Supplemental Figure 1).

Notably, we found that consistent QTL cqPHA09.d in the YX population and qPHA09.1a in the XZ population, had two common linked markers (Figure 4A). Through mapping markers linked to QTLs into the pseudomolecule A09 of A subgenome (A. duranensis V14167), 161 putative genes were detected in a 3.4 Mb physical interval (10231303–13631263 bp). One hundred and fifty genes were well annotated, whereas another 11 genes were reported to be unknown proteins, based on the results of BLAST searching for non-redundant protein sequences in NCBI (Supplemental Table S1). For GO annotation, 77 genes were assigned to at least one GO term. Among the genes involved in biological processes, oxidation reduction process and regulation of transcription were the most represented (Figure 4B). For molecular functions, metal ion binding, NADH dehydrogenase activity and zinc ion binding were the most represented (Figure 4C). Among cellular components the genes localized in, membranes were most represented (Figure 4D). Moreover, the KEGG analysis showed that 33 genes encoding oxidoreductases, transferases, hydrolases and ligases take part in 26 pathways including riboflavin metabolism, oxidative phosphorylation, biosynthesis of antibiotics, purine metabolism, amino sugar, and nucleotide sugar metabolism, etc. (Supplemental Table S2). Among all putative genes, one third (50 of 161) were found with corresponding orthologous transcripts in the transcriptome of the allotetraploid (Arachis hypogaea L.) (Clevenger et al., 2016). The expression pattern of these genes generally could be sorted into two subgroups (Figure 4E). The transcripts in one subgroup were mainly abundant in developmental pods, developmental seeds and tips from vegetative shoot and reproductive shoot. The members in another group were predominantly expressed in roots and nodules or leaves from seedling, main stem and lateral branch.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Overview of genetic and physical co-localized region on chromosome A09. (A) Genetic linkage groups mapping on physical chromosome A09. (B–D) The top ten terms of GO annotation among biological process (B), molecular function (C) and cellular component (D). (E) Hierarchical clustering of expression pattern in different organisms of the cultivated peanut. The values of transcript abundance were taken from (Clevenger et al., 2016).

Discussion

Plant height is a key trait highly related to plant architecture, resistance to lodging, biomass, yield, and adaptation to mechanized harvesting in most crops including peanut (Wang and Li, 2008; Salas Fernandez et al., 2009). In major cereal crops, well-known “green revolution” genes, sd1 and Rht-B1/Rht-D1 have been cloned, characterized and successfully applied in cultivation of semi-dwarf varieties with reduced plant height (Peng et al., 1999; Sasaki et al., 2002; Asano et al., 2007; Würschum et al., 2015). In peanut, genetic basis underlying plant height remains unclear in peanut. Since the phenotypic data of plant height is largely affected by the environment, breeders must work hard and spend time to assess the performances of varieties in multiple environments. Marker-assisted breeding has the potential to achieve higher genetic gains in less time through selecting markers linked to the QTLs for target trait (Janila et al., 2016). Several studies have been conducted in peanut to dissect the genetic natures and identify QTLs responsible for plant height; however, only single mapping population was used in the individual studies and no consistent QTLs from different populations were identified for this trait (Shirasawa et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2015, 2016; Li et al., 2017). The potential breeding value of these QTLs is thus limited because they are only effective in specific population. Therefore, it is necessry to identify consistent QTLs among different populations, which could be employed for marker-assisted breeeding in peanut.

In this study, two peanut RIL populations with different genetic backgrounds were used to explore possible consistent QTLs for plant height. Broad-sense heritability estimated in the two populations was 0.81 and 0.89 for plant height, indicating that the genetic role is dominant in controlling this trait in both populations. Using two high dense genetic linkage maps (Luo et al., 2017b) and phenotypic data from multiple environments, 38 and 10 QTLs for plant height were identified in the YX and XZ population, respectively. Through meta-analysis, 18 QTLs were integrated to eight consensus QTLs, which performed stably across multiple environments in the YX population. Previously, only three QTLs with stable performance in multiple environments were identified (Huang et al., 2016; Li et al., 2017). These stable QTLs would provide more opportunity to fine map candidate genes and further illustrate the mechanism of controlling plant height in the peanut. It is interesting to note that, one consensus QTL cqPHA09.d in the YX population was rightly overlapped with QTL qPHA09.1a in XZ population. Based on the linked markers mapped into the genome, the locus was localized in a 3.4 Mb physical region on chromosome A09. This locus could explain 23.22 and 8.17% phenotypic variations in the YX population and 7.52 phenotypic variation in the XZ population respectively. As we know, it is the first time to report a QTL for plant height which could express stably both in different populations and environments. Diagnostic markers developed from this stable QTL could be applicable in marker-assisted selection in peanut breeding.

Among the nine LGs harboring QTLs in the YX population, LGA01, A05, B02, B08, and B10 were not reported in previous studies. Therefore, 12 QTLs mapped on LGA01, A05, B02, B08, and B10 were novel. While five QTLs reported in previous works and 12 QTLs in this study were both mapped on LGA09. Similarly, 10 QTLs in the present research were mapped on LGB03, B04, and B05 which also harbored eight QTLs identified in previous study (Shirasawa et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2015, 2016; Li et al., 2017). For the XZ population, of 10 QTLs, qPHA05.2a on LGA05, qPHB08.3a on LGB08, and qPHB10.1a on LGB10 were reported for the first time in this study. On LGA09, LGB03, and LGB04, there were seven QTLs identified in this work and 14 QTLs reported in a previous studies (Shirasawa et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2015, 2016; Li et al., 2017). The identification of several QTLs in the present study indicated that plant height is a quantitative trait controlled by multiple genetic factors, and these novel QTLs may provide more new loci for improvement of this trait through marker-assisted selection.

Based on the above discussion, chromosome A09, B03, and B04 could stably harbor QTLs for plant height among different mapping populations. Especially for chromosome A09, almost one third of total QTLs (15/48) including eight major QTLs in two populations were located on this chromosome. These QTLs clustered together in approximately 20 cM interval in the YX population and 15 cM interval in the XZ population. These two intervals had 11 common linked markers and overlapped in the integrated map suggesting that A09 enriches genes controlling plant height. However, the order of common markers between the YX and XZ populations was not perfectly matched. Since female parent of the YX population was derived from interspecific hybridization between cultivated cultivar Baisha 1016 and a diploid wild species A. diogoi, heterologous genomic segments would introgress into the RIL population. Therefore, the order of several markers in the local region of A09 differed between the YX and XZ populations. To further verify that QTLs from the YX and XZ populations were co-localized on the chromosome A09, linked markers were mapped on the physical genome of Arachis duranesis. And a 3.4 Mb physical region on A09 that simultaneously harbor QTLs from different genetic backgrounds was identified.

Among the 161 putative genes in the region, there were five genes (Aradu.161GD, Aradu.19EUZ, Aradu.M7AQA, Aradu.QH2NX, and Aradu.YUV8P) belonging to the FHY3/FAR1-related gene family, which involved in phytochrome A and B signaling to control plant morphogenesis and height (Wang, 2004). In addition, two putative transcription factors, AIL1 (Aradu.C5HAC) and Brevis radix (Aradu.TM2EL) were reported to take part in auxin and BR signaling, respectively, in order to regulate cell growth (Mouchel et al., 2004; Horstman et al., 2014). Additionally, there were two pectin biogenesis protein-galacturonosyltransferases (Aradu.79NAD and Aradu.IVZ05) and a cell skeleton protein-actin (Aradu.FF624), which are essential for cell wall formation or modification and finally affect cell elongation (Li et al., 2005; Atmodjo et al., 2011; Qin et al., 2013). However, these genes are still candidates and much work should be done to further fine map the co-localized region and verify their functions.

In conclusion, we identified 48 QTLs including 13 major QTLs for plant height in two RIL populations. Eight consistent QTLs were found to perform stably across multiple environments in the YX population. A 3.4 Mb physical interval on chromosome A09 which harbored stable QTLs from different RIL populations was also identified. It is a reliable region harboring QTLs to be further fine mapping and genes cloning. Our results provide a solid foundation for exploring the gene regulatory network of plant height, while guiding development of diagnostic makers for peanut breeding.

Authors contributions

JL, NL, YL, LH, XZ, YC, HJ, and BL: conceived and designed the research; XR and HJ: developed two RIL populations; WC and JG: planted two RIL populations and conducted field management; NL, JL, ZX, ZL, and XL: performed the plant height management; JL: performed statistical analysis of the phenotyping data; NL: performed the QTL analysis, meta-analysis and GO annotation; NL and JL: wrote the manuscript; YL, JT, HJ, and BL: revised the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Funding. This work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 31471534, no. 31371662 and no. 31461143022), the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-13) and National Infrastructure for Crop Germplasm Resources (NICGR2017-36), special fund of Guizhou academy of agricultural sciences ([2015]06).

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2018.00684/full#supplementary-material

Supplemental Figure 1

Distribution of QTLs on the integrated linkage group A09 from the YX population and the XZ population. The italicized and highlighted loci represent common markers between the YX and XZ populations on A09.

Supplemental Table S1

Annotation of candidate genes in a co-localized interval on chromosome A09.

Supplemental Table S2

KEGG pathway for candidate genes in a co-localized interval on chromosome A09.

References

  1. Arcade A., Labourdette A., Falque M., Mangin B., Chardon F., Charcosset A., et al. (2004). BioMercator: integrating genetic maps and QTL towards discovery of candidate genes. Bioinformatics 20, 2324–2326. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth230 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Asano K., Takashi T., Miura K., Qian Q., Kitano H., Matsuoka M., et al. (2007). Genetic and molecular analysis of utility of sd1 alleles in rice breeding. Breed. Sci. 57, 53–58. 10.1270/jsbbs.57.53 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Atmodjo M. A., Sakuragi Y., Zhu X., Burrell A. J., Mohanty S. S., Atwood J. A., et al. (2011). Galacturonosyltransferase (GAUT)1 and GAUT7 are the core of a plant cell wall pectin biosynthetic homogalacturonan:galacturonosyltransferase complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 20225–20230. 10.1073/pnas.1112816108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bertioli D. J., Cannon S. B., Froenicke L., Huang G., Farmer A. D., Cannon E. K., et al. (2016). The genome sequences of Arachis duranensis and Arachis ipaensis, the diploid ancestors of cultivated peanut. Nat. Genet. 48, 438–446. 10.1038/ng.3517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen W., Jiao Y., Cheng L., Huang L., Liao B., Tang M., et al. (2016). Quantitative trait locus analysis for pod- and kernel-related traits in the cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). BMC Genet. 17:25. 10.1186/s12863-016-0337-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clevenger J., Chu Y., Scheffler B., Ozias-Akins P. (2016). A developmental transcriptome map for allotetraploid Arachis hypogaea. Front. Plant Sci. 7:1446. 10.3389/fpls.2016.01446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Conesa A., Götz S., García-Gómez J. M., Terol J., Talon M., Robles M. (2005). Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 21, 3674–3676. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti610 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cui F., Li J., Ding A., Zhao C., Wang L., Wang X., et al. (2011). Conditional QTL mapping for plant height with respect to the length of the spike and internode in two mapping populations of wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 122, 1517–1536. 10.1007/s00122-011-1551-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Falster D. S., Westoby M. (2003). Plant height and evolutionary games. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 337–343. 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00061-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. FAOSTAT (2014). Statistical Database FAOSTAT. Available online at: http://faostat3.fao.org
  11. Goffinet B., Gerber S. (2000). Quantitative trait loci: a meta-analysis. Genetics 155, 463–473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Han Z., Hu W., Tan C., Xing Y. (2017). QTLs for heading date and plant height under multiple environments in rice. Genetica 145, 67–77. 10.1007/s10709-016-9946-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Holl J. B., Nyquist W. E., Cervantes-Martinez C. T. (2010). Estimating and interpreting heritability for plant breeding: anupdate. Plant Breed. Rev. 22, 9–112. 10.1002/9780470650202.ch2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Horstman A., Willemsen V., Boutilier K., Heidstra R. (2014). Aintegumenta-like proteins: hubs in a plethora of networks. Trends Plant Sci. 19, 146–157. 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.10.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang L., He H., Chen W., Ren X., Chen Y., Zhou X., et al. (2015). Quantitative trait locus analysis of agronomic and quality-related traits in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 128, 1103–1115. 10.1007/s00122-015-2493-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Huang L., Ren X., Wu B., Li X., Chen W., Zhou X., et al. (2016). Development and deployment of a high-density linkage map identified quantitative trait loci for plant height in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Sci. Rep. 6:39478. 10.1038/srep39478 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ikeda A., Ueguchi-Tanaka M., Sonoda Y., Kitano H., Koshioka M., Futsuhara Y., et al. (2001). Slender rice, a constitutive gibberellin response mutant, is caused by a null mutation of the SLR1 gene, an ortholog of the height-regulating gene GAI/RGA/RHT/D8. Plant Cell 13, 999–1010. 10.1105/tpc.13.5.999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Janila P., Variath M. T., Pandey M. K., Desmae H., Motagi B. N., Okori P., et al. (2016). Genomic tools in groundnut breeding program: status and perspectives. Front. Plant Sci. 7:289. 10.3389/fpls.2016.00289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jiang H., Huang L., Ren X., Chen Y., Zhou X., Xia Y., et al. (2014). Diversity characterization and association analysis of agronomic traits in a Chinese peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) mini-core collection. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 56, 159–169. 10.1111/jipb.12132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Leal-Bertioli S. C., Moretzsohn M. C., Roberts P. A., Ballén-Taborda C., Borba T. C., Valdisser P. A., et al. (2015). Genetic mapping of resistance to Meloidogyne arenaria in Arachis stenosperma: a new source of nematode resistance for peanut. G3 6, 377–390. 10.1534/g3.115.023044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lee S., Jia M. H., Jia Y., Liu G. (2014). Tagging quantitative trait loci for heading date and plant height in important breeding parents of rice (Oryza sativa). Euphytica 197, 191–200. 10.1007/s10681-013-1051-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Li X. B., Fan X. P., Wang X. L., Cai L., Yang W. C. (2005). The Cotton actin1 gene is functionally expressed in fibers and participates in fiber elongation. Plant Cell 17, 859–875. 10.1105/tpc.104.029629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Li Y., Li L., Zhang X., Zhang K., Ma D., Liu J., et al. (2017). QTL mapping and marker analysis of main stem height and the first lateral branch length in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica 213:57 10.1007/s10681-017-1847-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Luo H., Guo J., Ren X., Chen W., Huang L., Zhou X., et al. (2017a). Chromosomes A07 and A05 associated with stable and major QTLs for pod weight and size in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 131, 267–282. 10.1007/s00122-017-3000-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Luo H., Ren X., Li Z., Xu Z., Li X., Huang L., et al. (2017b). Co-localization of major quantitative trait loci for pod size and weight to a 3.7 cM interval on chromosome A05 in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). BMC Genomics 18:58. 10.1186/s12864-016-3456-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Luo H., Xu Z., Li Z., Li X., Lv J., Ren X., et al. (2017c). Development of SSR markers and identification of major quantitative trait loci controlling shelling percentage in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 130, 1635–1648. 10.1007/s00122-017-2915-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mouchel C. F., Briggs G. C., Hardtke C. S. (2004). Natural genetic variation in Arabidopsis identifies BREVIS RADIX, a novel regulator of cell proliferation and elongation in the root. Genes Dev. 18, 700–714. 10.1101/gad.1187704 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pandey M. K., Khan A. W., Singh V. K., Vishwakarma M. K., Shasidhar Y., Kumar V., et al. (2016). QTL-seq approach identified genomic regions and diagnostic markers for rust and late leaf spot resistance in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Biotechnol. J. 15, 927–941. 10.1111/pbi.12686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pandey M. K., Wang M. L., Qiao L., Feng S., Khera P., Wang H., et al. (2014). Identification of QTLs associated with oil content and mapping FAD2 genes and their relative contribution to oil quality in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). BMC Genet. 15:133. 10.1186/s12863-014-0133-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Peng J., Richards D. E., Hartley N. M., Murphy G. P., Devos K. M., Flintham J. E., et al. (1999). ‘Green revolution’genes encode mutant gibberellin response modulators. Nature 400, 256–261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Qin L. X., Rao Y., Li L., Huang J. F., Xu W. L., Li X. B. (2013). Cotton GalT1 encoding a putative glycosyltransferase is involved in regulation of cell wall pectin biosynthesis during plant development. PLoS ONE 8:e59115. 10.1371/journal.pone.0059115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Salas Fernandez M. G., Becraft P. W., Yin Y., Lubberstedt T. (2009). From dwarves to giants? Plant height manipulation for biomass yield. Trends Plant Sci. 14, 454–461. 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.06.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sarlikioti V., de Visser P. H., Buck-Sorlin G. H., Marcelis L. F. (2011). How plant architecture affects light absorption and photosynthesis in tomato: towards an ideotype for plant architecture using a functional-structural plant model. Ann. Bot. 108, 1065–1073. 10.1093/aob/mcr221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sasaki A., Ashikari M., Ueguchi-Tanaka M., Itoh H., Nishimura A., Swapan D., et al. (2002). Green revolution: a mutant gibberellin-synthesis gene in rice. Nature 416, 701–702. 10.1038/416701a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Shirasawa K., Koilkonda P., Aoki K., Hirakawa H., Tabata S., Watanabe M., et al. (2012). In silico polymorphism analysis for the development of simple sequence repeat and transposon markers and construction of linkage map in cultivated peanut. BMC Plant Biol. 12:80. 10.1186/1471-2229-12-80 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Teng F., Zhai L., Liu R., Bai W., Wang L., Huo D., et al. (2013). ZmGA3ox2, a candidate gene for a major QTL, qPH3.1, for plant height in maize. Plant J. 73, 405–416. 10.1111/tpj.12038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tong H., Liu L., Jin Y., Du L., Yin Y., Qian Q., et al. (2012). DWARF and LOW-TILLERING acts as a direct downstream target of a GSK3/SHAGGY-Like Kinase to mediate brassinosteroid responses in Rice. Plant Cell 24, 2562–2577. 10.1105/tpc.112.097394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Udall J. A., Quijada P. A., Lambert B., Osborn T. C. (2006). Quantitative trait analysis of seed yield and other complex traits in hybrid spring rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): 2. Identification of alleles from unadapted germplasm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 113, 597–609. 10.1007/s00122-006-0324-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Varshney R. K., Pandey M. K., Janila P., Nigam S. N., Sudini H., Gowda M. V., et al. (2014). Marker-assisted introgression of a QTL region to improve rust resistance in three elite and popular varieties of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 127, 1771–1781. 10.1007/s00122-014-2338-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang H. (2004). Arabidopsis FHY3/FAR1 gene family and distinct roles of its members in light control of Arabidopsis development. Plant Physiol. 136, 4010–4022. 10.1104/pp.104.052191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang Y., Li J. (2008). Molecular basis of plant architecture. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 253–279. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wilhelm E. P., Boulton M. I., Al-Kaff N., Balfourier F., Bordes J., Greenland A. J., et al. (2013). Rht-1 and Ppd-D1 associations with height, GA sensitivity, and days to heading in a worldwide bread wheat collection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 126, 2233–2243. 10.1007/s00122-013-2130-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Würschum T., Langer S. M., Longin C. F. (2015). Genetic control of plant height in European winter wheat cultivars. Theor. Appl. Genet. 128, 865–874. 10.1007/s00122-015-2476-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wu X., Wang Z., Chang X., Jing R. (2010). Genetic dissection of the developmental behaviours of plant height in wheat under diverse water regimes. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 2923–2937. 10.1093/jxb/erq117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zeng Z. B. (1994). Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 136, 1457–1468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhang N., Fan X., Cui F., Zhao C., Zhang W., Zhao X., et al. (2017). Characterization of the temporal and spatial expression of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plant height at the QTL level and their influence on yield-related traits. Theor. Appl. Genet. 130, 1235–1252. 10.1007/s00122-017-2884-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhang Y., Luo L., Xu C., Zhang Q., Xing Y. (2006). Quantitative trait loci for panicle size, heading date and plant height co-segregating in trait-performance derived near-isogenic lines of rice (Oryza sativa). Theor. Appl. Genet. 113, 361–368. 10.1007/s00122-006-0305-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhou X., Xia Y., Liao J., Liu K., Li Q., Dong Y., et al. (2016). Quantitative trait locus analysis of late leaf spot resistance and plant-type-related traits in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under Multi-Environments. PLoS ONE 11:e0166873. 10.1371/journal.pone.0166873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zou J., Chen Z., Zhang S., Zhang W., Jiang G., Zhao X., et al. (2005). Characterizations and fine mapping of a mutant gene for high tillering and dwarf in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Planta 222, 604–612. 10.1007/s00425-005-0007-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Figure 1

Distribution of QTLs on the integrated linkage group A09 from the YX population and the XZ population. The italicized and highlighted loci represent common markers between the YX and XZ populations on A09.

Supplemental Table S1

Annotation of candidate genes in a co-localized interval on chromosome A09.

Supplemental Table S2

KEGG pathway for candidate genes in a co-localized interval on chromosome A09.


Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES