Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Methods. 2017 Dec 22;138-139:54–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.12.017

Application of Paramagnetic Relaxation Enhancements to Accelerate the Acquisition of 2D and 3D Solid-State NMR Spectra of Oriented Membrane Proteins

Songlin Wang 1, T Gopinath 1, Gianluigi Veglia 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC5984106  NIHMSID: NIHMS931139  PMID: 29274874

Abstract

Oriented sample solid-state NMR (OS-ssNMR) spectroscopy is uniquely suited to determine membrane protein topology at the atomic resolution in liquid crystalline bilayers under physiological temperature. However, the inherent low sensitivity of this technique has hindered the throughput of multidimensional experiments necessary for resonance assignments and structure determination. In this work, we show that doping membrane protein bicelle preparations with paramagnetic ion chelated lipids and exploiting paramagnetic relaxation effects it is possible to accelerate the acquisition of both 2D and 3D multidimensional experiments with significant saving in time. We demonstrate the efficacy of this method for a small membrane protein, sarcolipin, reconstituted in DMPC/POPC/DHPC oriented bicelles. In particular, using Cu2+-DMPE-DTPA as a dopant, we observed a decrease of 1H T1 of sarcolipin by 2/3, allowing us to reduce the recycle delay up to 3 times. We anticipate that these new developments will enable the routine acquisition of multidimensional OS-ssNMR experiments.

Keywords: Oriented sample solid-state NMR, paramagnetic relaxation enhancements, separated local fields, sensitivity enhancement

1. Introduction

Solid-state NMR (ssNMR) is the only spectroscopic technique that provides atomic-resolution structural information of membrane proteins in lipids under liquid crystalline state [15]. Currently, ssNMR methods come in two different flavors: magic angle spinning (MAS), and oriented sample (OS) ssNMR. While MAS experiments are the primary source for isotropic chemical shifts, torsion angles, and dipolar couplings [68], OS-ssNMR provides topological information of membrane proteins embedded in fully hydrated lipid membranes [912], through anisotropic parameters, such as chemical shift anisotropy (CSA) and dipolar coupling (DC) [13]. These two techniques are being applied synergistically to characterize the secondary and tertiary structures as well as the architecture of the proteins within lipid bilayers [1, 1416]. OS-ssNMR techniques, however, remain hampered by challenges such as the low protein concentrations (protein to lipids ratios range from 1:100 to 1:200), hardware limitations (RF heating), as well as length of the multidimensional experiments.

The introduction of oriented lipid bicelles [17] and the low-E probes [18] have dramatically improved both sample preparation and spectroscopy. In pursuit of further reducing the acquisition times, our group recently implemented sensitivity enhancement (SE) schemes into the separated local field (SLF) experiments [19], which boosted the sensitivity of multidimensional experiments up to 180%. However, the acquisition of 2D and 3D OS-ssNMR spectra is still time-consuming. During the execution of a pulse sequence, the majority of the experimental time is spent waiting for the spin systems to return to equilibrium via the longitudinal relaxation mechanism (T1). Therefore, the spectrometers remain idle for ~90–95% of the time, and, as a result, 3D experiments may take up to several weeks.

In recent years, several groups have used paramagnetic agents as means of providing distances as well as to accelerating the acquisition of multidimensional experiments in MAS experiments [2023]. In fact, paramagnetic centers with unpaired electrons enhance nuclear T1 relaxation rates of proteins via dipolar interaction [24], significantly reducing the experimental time associated with long recycle delays. In particular, Cu2+-chelated complexes have been employed as doping agents to facilitate data collection on microcrystalline protein preparations as well as fibrillary proteins [22, 2533]. Remarkably, 100-fold saving in time was achieved by combining Cu2+-EDTA doping with 1H detection and ultra-fast MAS [29]. Other successful applications include chelated complexes of paramagnetic metal ions (i.e., Co3+, Ni2+, and Gd3+) and radicals [3437].

Ramamoorthy and co-workers first demonstrated the use of paramagnetic ion chelated lipids to reduce longitudinal 1H relaxation times for experiments with bicelles using OS-ssNMR techniques [38]. Comparing with Cu2+-chelated complexes, paramagnetic ion chelated lipids eliminate the mobiliting of the ions avoiding RF heating that would damage the samples. More recently, Nevzorov’s group used PRE arising from free radicals to speed-up the acquisition of 2D OS-ssNMR of pf1 coat protein reconstituted in lipid bicelles [37, 39]. Here, we show that doping lipid bicelles with ~5% of 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid copper salt (Cu2+-DMPE-DTPA) reduced 1H T1 relaxation rates of a membrane protein significantly, subsequently shortening the recycle delays and speeding up the acquisition of a 3D NMR spectrum used for sequential resonance assignment of a membrane protein amide backbone. As a benchmark, we used sarcolipin (SLN), a 31-residue single-pass polypeptide that regulates the activity of the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA) [4045]. We show a significant reduction in time for both 2D and 3D OS-ssNMR experiments. These advancements will make it possible to carry out routine multidimensional NMR experiments on membrane proteins.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Detergent-mediated reconstitution of SLN in oriented lipid bicelles

Recombinant [U-15N] SLN was produced as previously described [46]. Figure 1 shows a schematic of our detergent-mediated reconstitution protocol for membrane proteins in magnetically aligned bicelles. As previously observed [1], we found that using detergents rather than organic solvents to reconstitute SLN in bicelles improved the amide line widths and enable a better control of pH of the preparation. For the SLN in bicelle samples, we prepared three different lipid samples: the first in which we used CHCl3 to solubilize 26.6 mg 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DMPC, long chain lipids) and 7.5 mg 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC, long chain lipids), the second, 6.1 mg 1,2-dihexanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DHPC, short chain lipids), and the third, 2.4 mg 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid copper salt (Cu2+-DMPE-DTPA, paramagnetic lipids). To eliminate any trace of organic solvents, we dried all lipids under a flux of N2 gas and lyophilize overnight. We dissolved DMPC and POPC in C12E8 (detergent/lipid ratio of 2:1 w/w) to form a clear suspension of mixed micelles. We then solubilized SLN (1.8 mg) separately with 1% C12E8 solution and then added to the mixed micelle preparation. We adjusted the sample volume to 20 mL using the ‘NMR buffer’ (20 mM HEPES, 50 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM DDT, 0.02% NaN3). We incubated the mixture containing of SLN, long chain lipids, and C12E8 with Biobeads® (1:30 w/w ratio for detergent/Biobeads®) for 3h to completely remove the detergent. The cloudiness of the suspension confirmed the formation of the DMPC/POPC vesicles containing SLN. After Biobeads® removal, we adjusted the pH of the sample to 7.0 and centrifuged the DMPC/POPC vesicles containing SLN at a speed of 50,000 g for one hour. We suspended the other pellets containing Cu2+-DMPE-DTPA and DHPC separately in two test tubes with 30 μL of NMR buffer and added them in sequence to the vesicle preparation. To ensure the formation of a homogeneous suspension, we vortexed the protein/lipid mixture for about 2 min and formed the bicelle phase by carrying out 3–5 freeze/thaw cycles. Finally, we concentrated the sample to a volume of 180 μL prior to loading it into a 5 mm flat-bottom glass tube for spectroscopy.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic representation of sample preparation of membrane proteins reconstituted in magnetically aligned bicelles containing paramagnetic lipids.

2.2. NMR Methods, and Instrumentation

All the experiments were performed on Varian VNMRS spectrometers operating at a 1H frequency of either 600 MHz or 700 MHz equipped with low-E static bicelle probe built by the RF program at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory (NHMFL) in Florida [18]. We used a 90° pulse length of 4 μs (62.5 kHz) for both 15N and 1H channels. We set the cross-polarization (CP) time at 750 μs on 1H and 15N channels. During CP, the 1H amplitude was linearly swept from 38 kHz to 62 kHz, while 15N amplitude was kept constant at 50 kHz. We used a SPINAL64 decoupling sequence [47] during acquisition with 50 kHz 1H RF amplitude. During the SE-SAMPI4 [48], we implemented a t1 homonuclear decoupling on 1H channel using 62.5 kHz RF amplitude with a dwell time of 96 μs. We used phase-switched spin-lock pulses on 15N channel with 62.5 kHz RF amplitude during the t1 evolution matching the Hartmann-Hahn condition. For sensitivity enhancement, we set τ delay of the SE scheme to 75 μs, corresponding to three cycles of phase-modulated Lee-Goldberg (PMLG) [49] with effective RF amplitude of 80 kHz. For water-edited experiments, we set the τ value to 1.8 ms, which acts as a T2 filter for dephasing the 1H magnetization of both protein and lipids, while retaining water magnetization. We achieved water-protein polarization transfer by varying the τmix value. For the proton driven spin diffusion (PDSD) experiment [50, 51], we set the mixing time at 3 s. In the absence of paramagnetic lipids, we used a recycle delay of 3 s, whereas we set the recycle delay to 1 s for Cu2+-DMPE-DTPA doped samples.

3. Results

3.1. PRE in OS-ssNMR

The use of paramagnetic ion chelated lipids such as Cu2+-DMPE-DTPA (Figure 2a) is an efficient way to introduce dopants into magnetically aligned bicelles [38]. In fact, paramagnetic ion chelated lipids have two major advantages: 1) the ion centers are located close to the proteins, providing more significant PRE effects, and 2) only 5%–10% doped lipids are typically needed to induce a significant effect on the 1H T1 (Figure 2b).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Paramagnetic chelated lipids[38]. a) Chemical structure of Cu2+-DMPE-DTPA, and b) schematic representation of a hypothetical SLN reconstituted in lipid bicelles containing Cu2+ chelated lipid.

Figure 3a shows the amide region of SLN detected using the 1H inversion recovery pulse sequence (180°-τ-90°). As shown by the spectra as a function of τ, the T1 relaxation is reduced from 0.89 s to 0.29 s using bicelles doped with 5% of Cu2+-chelated lipids. For diamagnetic samples, a recycle delay of approximately 3 × T1 is generally used, which recovers about 95% of the 1H polarization back to z-direction prior to next scan. As shown in Figure 3b, for the paramagnetic-doped bicelle samples the recycle delay can be reduced from 2.67 to 0.87 s, speeding up the execution of the pulse sequences.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effects of paramagnetic chelated lipids on the spin relaxation properties of SLN reconstituted in lipid bicelles. a) Measurement of the bulk 1H T1 relaxation time by 15N-detected inversion recovery experiment for [U-15N]-SLN reconstituted in oriented bicelles with (blue) and without (green) 5% Cu2+-chelated lipids. b) Experimental data and fitting curves for the inversion recovery experiments. The bulk 1H T1 for [U-15N]-SLN in bicelles are 0.29 s and 0.89 s with and without 5% Cu2+-chelated lipids, respectively. c) 1D 15N spectra of [U-15N]-SLN reconstituted in oriented bicelles acquired using different 1H decoupling RF amplitudes.

Although the low-E probe technology dramatically reduces RF heating, it is recommended to use 1 to 1.5 s recycle delay to avoid sample overheating [38]. Lowering the RF decoupling field (i.e., 25 to 30 kHz) makes it possible to reduce the recycle delay to less than 1 s. However, under our experimental conditions, we found that low decoupling powers lead to significant resonance broadening, jeopardizing the spectral resolution (Figure 3c).

3.2. Application of paramagnetic ion chelated lipids to speed up 2D SE-SLF experiments

Figure 4a shows the residue-specific 1H T1 relaxation for [U-15N]-SLN using 2D SE-SAMPI4 experiment proceeded by a 1H inversion recovery sequence (180°-τ-90°). The distance between the membrane surface and the center of the bicelles is ~25 Å, which is beyond the effective distance for Cu2+ to influence 1H longitudinal relaxation mechanism. However, the site-specific 1H T1 values (Figure 4b) show the PRE enhancement throughout the transmembrane residues of SLN, probably due to a spin diffusion mechanism [38].

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Site-specific 1H T1 relaxation times of the backbone resonances of [U-15N]-SLN oriented in lipid bicelles with 5% Cu2+-chelated lipids measured by the 2D inversion recovery SAMPI4 experiment. b) Mapping of the site-specific T1 relaxation times on SLN structure (blue), where unobservable/overlapped residues in the SAMPI4 spectrum are shown in white. C) 2D SE-SAMPI4 spectra of [U-15N]-SLN without paramagnetic and d) with 5% Cu2+-chelated lipids. The average 15N linewidth for isolated peaks are 82.9 Hz and 86.7 Hz without and with 5% Cu2+-chelated lipids, respectively.

Figures 4c and 4d compare the 2D SE-SAMPI4 spectra of [U-15N]-SLN with and without 5% Cu2+-chelated lipids. The total acquisition times were 3 hours using 3.0 s of recycle delay and only 35 minutes using 1.0 s for the samples without and with Cu2+-chelated lipids, respectively. The identical resonance positions (CSA and DC) in these two spectra suggest that no conformational or topological changes were caused by the addition of paramagnetic lipids. Moreover, no significant line broadening of the resonances was observed for all the residues including those near the membrane surface (see Figure 4). The latter result indicates that the Cu2+-chelated lipids do not change 15N T2 relaxation significantly, even though the paramagnetic centers are localized close to SLN, as observed for Aβ (1–42) peptide in membrane mimetic environments [33]. Other MAS ssNMR studies have shown that quenching of the resonances belonging to residues located on the extra-membrane loops using Gd3+-chelated lipids, due to strong effects on both 1H T1 and 13C/15 N T2 relaxation mechanisms for residues nearby the paramagnetic centers [52].

3.3. Speeding up protein sequential assignment using PRE for acquisition of 2D and 3D OS-ssNMR experiments

For single-pass membrane proteins, the regular patterns of the 2D SE-SLF spectra together with selective labeling of amino acids are often sufficient to assign the backbone resonances [53, 54]. However, this approach fails when deviations from ideal helices occur or when multispan membrane proteins are analyzed. To obtain backbone sequential assignments, a successful strategy is combining SLF experiments with through-space correlations [5557]. These experiments can be accomplished via homonuclear 15N-15N polarization transfer using proton-driven spin diffusion (PDSD) [58, 59], cross-relaxation driven spin diffusion (CRDSD) [60], or mismatch Hartmann-Hahn (MMHH) polarization transfer methods [61, 62]. In our lab, we successfully implemented these schemes in both 2D and 3D sequential correlation experiments such as dual acquisition 2D SLF-PDSD and 3D SE-SLF-PDSD [57]. Usually, we utilize 2D SLF-PDSD experiments as a quick way to confirm resonances sequential assignments, while we use the 3D SE-SLF-PDSD for de novo resonance assignments.

Figures 5a and 5b show the 2D SE-SAMPI4-PDSD spectra of [U-15N]-SLN reconstituted in bicelles with and without 5% Cu2+-DMPE-DTPA. The overall patterns of the two spectra are essentially identical. This result suggests that the polarization transfer efficiency of the PDSD element is not affected by the paramagnetic centers. We then tested the PRE effects on the 3D SE-SAMPI4-PDSD experiment with [U-15N]-SLN using 1.5 s as recycle delay. Figures 5c and 5d show that most of the resonance peaks display sequential correlations. In fact, in the 3D strip plots it is possible to assign all of the resonances from the transmembrane region of SLN unambiguously. This new set of data matches the previous assignment acquired in the absence of paramagnetic centers [57]. In this case, however, the time saving is not as significant as for the 2D SE-SLF experiments, due to the long PDSD mixing time (3 s). Nonetheless, the saving of experimental time is 25% with respect to the experiment acquired with diamagnetic sample. The total experimental time for 3D SE-SAMPI4-PDSD spectra is ~95 hours against ~120 hours for the diamagnetic sample.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Comparison of 2D SE-SAMPI4-PDSD spectra of [U-15N]-SLN with a) and without b) 5% Cu2+-chelated lipids. The PDSD mixing time was set to 3.0 s for both experiments. c) 3D SE-SAMPI4-PDSD spectrum of [U-15N]-SLN in bicelles doped with 5% Cu2+-chelated lipids. d) 3D strip plots at specific dipolar coupling values from the 3D SE-SAMPI4-PDSD spectrum. The solid blue lines indicate [i, i+1] cross peaks.

3.4. Application of paramagnetic ion chelated lipids for water-edited OS-ssNMR experiments

Water-protein interactions play an important role in driving the structural dynamics and functional properties of proteins [6367]. Recently, we implemented a new spectral editing technique for oriented membrane proteins to map the residue-specific water-protein interactions (water-edited SE-SLF) [68]. In this experiment, a 90° pulse followed by a spin-echo period (~1.6 ms) retains 1H polarization from bound water molecules close to the membrane surface, while dephasing the 1H coherences of protein and lipid molecules. The water polarization is then transferred to protein protons during the homonuclear transfer period (τmix), followed by 1D CP or 2D SE-SLF sequence. Figure 6a shows the build-up curve extracted from 1D water-edited CP spectra of SLN bicelle sample doped with 5% of Cu2+-DMPE-DTPA. The mixing times (τmix) were set to 0, 3, 5, 7, 10, 30, 50, 100, 150, and 400 ms. The integrated peak intensities of the 1D spectra between 0 and 200 ppm are plotted with respect to the square root of mixing time. The polarization builds up monotonously until 100 ms mixing time and is followed by a gradual decay. This expected behavior is due to paramagnetic quenching of T1 relaxation of bound water molecules that are in close proximity to the Cu2+ center on the lipid head groups. Nevertheless, only shorter mixing times (less than 20 ms) are generally useful for spectral editing and thus paramagnetic sample preparations make it possible to acquire these water-edited experiments with shorter recycle delay. As an example, Figures 6b and 6c show the 2D water-edited SE-SAMPI4 spectra of [U-15N]-SLN using 1.5 s recycle delay with 7 and 100 ms mixing times. At 7 ms of mixing time, only those residues close to the membrane surface were polarized. Whereas at 100 ms, the entire transmembrane domain residues are polarized via water-protein and 1H-1H spin-diffusion processes.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Water-edited experiments using PRE. a) 1D water-edited CP spectra of [U-15N]-SLN oriented in lipid bicelle using 5% Cu2+-chelated lipids (b) and (c) 2D water-edited SE-SAMPI4 spectra acquired with 7 and 100 ms mixing times, respectively. The residues that are mapped at 7 ms mixing time, are close to the water-lipid interface. All of the experiments were acquired using 1.5 s recycle delay

4. Discussions

The use of PRE is becoming more widespread for both liquid-state and ssNMR spectroscopy, either for measuring long-range distances or for decreasing NMR experimental time. In the latter case, the key is to use paramagnetic agents that act only on the 1H T1 mechanism without affecting the 13C/15N T2 relaxation times. In the past decade, many studies have been devoted to the study of a wide range of paramagnetic agents such as 5-DOXYL stearic acid, Gd+3 and Cu2+ ions. Obtaining quantitative information from the use of PRE for membrane protein samples is not straightforward due to the presence of the membrane and complex protein-lipid interactions. However, a careful sample preparation can accelerate the spectroscopy of oriented samples. In agreement with previous studies, our results indicate that using a low concentration of paramagnetic ion chelated lipids (~5 mM Cu2+), the 1H T1 values of membrane proteins can be reduced by a factor of three without jeopardizing the spectral resolution. In addition, the incorporation of paramagnetic lipids does not require modification of the target membrane proteins, preventing chemical shift perturbations and/or conformational alteration. Using 2D SE-SLF and 3D-SE-SLF-PDSD experiments we were able to map all of the residues of a small membrane protein, SLN, and its topology in lipid membranes [57]. Note that the normal of the membrane in the bicelle preparations is oriented perpendicularly to the direction of the static field, i.e., ‘unflipped bicelles’. This orientation gives rise to narrower 15N line widths with respect to the ‘flipped bicelles’, with the normal of the bilayer oriented parallel to the static magnetic field [69]. However, both CSA and DC dimensions for unflipped bicelles are scaled by a factor of 0.5, reducing the spectral resolution. For larger, multispan membrane proteins, the oriented bicelles can be flipped by using YbCl3, as in the case of bicelles without paramagnetic chelated lipids, doubling the spectral resolution as reported previously [70]. Remarkably, Ramamoorthy and coworkers have shown the application of lanthanide ions such as Yb3+ to change the orientation of macro-nanodiscs [71], a new, versatile membrane mimetic system that promise to further boost the application of OS-ssNMR to larger membrane proteins.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we demonstrated that by doping bicelles with Cu2+-DMPE-DTPA it is possible to accelerate the acquisition of 2D and 3D OS-ssNMR experiments on membrane proteins. We found that only a small concentration of Cu2+-DMPE-DTPA (~5%) is required to significantly reduce the 1H T1 without inducing any structural changes or affecting T2 relaxation mechanism. Taken together with the recent developments in low-E probe technology, the 2D and 3D sensitivity enhanced OS-ssNMR methods can be routinely used for fast data collection in the assignment of both chemical shifts and the topology of membrane proteins in liquid crystalline phase. We anticipate that the reduction of the experimental time for the 3D OS-ssNMR and the recent advances (such as high magnetic fields and non-uniform sampling) will propel the OS-ssNMR spectroscopy toward larger and more complex membrane proteins and membrane protein complexes.

HIGHLIGHTS.

  • Paramagnetic relaxation enhancement accelerate 3D NMR spectroscopy of oriented sample

  • Cu2+ chelated lipids decrease 1H T1 relaxation mechanism of membrane proteins in bicelles

  • Detergent-mediated reconstitution of membrane proteins in micelles improve resolution

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the National Institute of Health (GM 64742 to G.V.). We would like to thank Bethany Pertzsch for helping with SLN expression and purification, Dr. Daniel Weber and Erik Larsen for critical reading of this manuscript.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Das N, Murray DT, Cross TA. Lipid bilayer preparations of membrane proteins for oriented and magic-angle spinning solid-state NMR samples. Nat Protoc. 2013;8(11):2256–70. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ding Y, Yao Y, Marassi FM. Membrane protein structure determination in membrana. Acc Chem Res. 2013;46(9):2182–90. doi: 10.1021/ar400041a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Opella SJ, Marassi FM. Applications of NMR to membrane proteins. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2017;628:92–101. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2017.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hong M. Oligomeric structure, dynamics, and orientation of membrane proteins from solid-state NMR. Structure. 2006;14(12):1731–40. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2006.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang S, Ladizhansky V. Recent advances in magic angle spinning solid state NMR of membrane proteins. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2014;82:1–26. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2014.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Baker LA, Folkers GE, Sinnige T, Houben K, Kaplan M, van der Cruijsen EA, Baldus M. Magic-angle-spinning solid-state NMR of membrane proteins. Methods Enzymol. 2015;557:307–28. doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2014.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sun S, Han Y, Paramasivam S, Yan S, Siglin AE, Williams JC, Byeon IJ, Ahn J, Gronenborn AM, Polenova T. Solid-state NMR spectroscopy of protein complexes. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;831:303–31. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-480-3_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McDermott A, Polenova T. Solid state NMR: new tools for insight into enzyme function. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2007;17(5):617–22. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2007.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhou HX, Cross TA. Influences of membrane mimetic environments on membrane protein structures. Annu Rev Biophys. 2013;42:361–92. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-083012-130326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gopinath T, Mote KR, Veglia G. Sensitivity and resolution enhancement of oriented solid-state NMR: Application to membrane proteins. Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. 2013;75(Supplement C):50–68. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2013.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gayen A, Banigan JR, Traaseth NJ. Ligand-induced conformational changes of the multidrug resistance transporter EmrE probed by oriented solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2013;52(39):10321–4. doi: 10.1002/anie.201303091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Salnikov E, Aisenbrey C, Vidovic V, Bechinger B. Solid-state NMR approaches to measure topological equilibria and dynamics of membrane polypeptides. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1798(2):258–65. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2009.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ramamoorthy A, Opella SJ. Two-dimensional chemical shift/heteronuclear dipolar coupling spectra obtained with polarization inversion spin exchange at the magic angle and magic-angle sample spinning (PISEMAMAS) Solid State Nucl Magn Reson. 1995;4(6):387–92. doi: 10.1016/0926-2040(95)00054-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Verardi R, Shi L, Traaseth NJ, Walsh N, Veglia G. Structural topology of phospholamban pentamer in lipid bilayers by a hybrid solution and solid-state NMR method. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(22):9101–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016535108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sanz-Hernandez M, Vostrikov VV, Veglia G, De Simone A. Accurate Determination of Conformational Transitions in Oligomeric Membrane Proteins. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23063. doi: 10.1038/srep23063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vostrikov VV, Mote KR, Verardi R, Veglia G. Structural dynamics and topology of phosphorylated phospholamban homopentamer reveal its role in the regulation of calcium transport. Structure. 2013;21(12):2119–30. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2013.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Durr UH, Gildenberg M, Ramamoorthy A. The magic of bicelles lights up membrane protein structure. Chem Rev. 2012;112(11):6054–74. doi: 10.1021/cr300061w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gor’kov PL, Chekmenev EY, Li C, Cotten M, Buffy JJ, Traaseth NJ, Veglia G, Brey WW. Using low-E resonators to reduce RF heating in biological samples for static solid-state NMR up to 900 MHz. J Magn Reson. 2007;185(1):77–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2006.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gopinath T, Veglia G. Sensitivity Enhancement in Static Solid-State NMR Experiments via Single- and Multiple-Quantum Dipolar Coherences. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2009;131(16):5754–5756. doi: 10.1021/ja900096d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sengupta I, Nadaud PS, Helmus JJ, Schwieters CD, Jaroniec CP. Protein fold determined by paramagnetic magic-angle spinning solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Nat Chem. 2012;4(5):410–417. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Buffy JJ, Hong T, Yamaguchi S, Waring AJ, Lehrer RI, Hong M. Solid-State NMR Investigation of the Depth of Insertion of Protegrin-1 in Lipid Bilayers Using Paramagnetic Mn(2+) Biophysical Journal. 2003;85(4):2363–2373. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(03)74660-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wickramasinghe NP, Parthasarathy S, Jones CR, Bhardwaj C, Long F, Kotecha M, Mehboob S, Fung LWM, Past J, Samoson A, Ishii Y. Nanomole-scale protein solid-state NMR by breaking intrinsic 1H T1 boundaries. Nat Meth. 2009;6(3):215–218. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Maltsev S, Hudson SM, Sahu ID, Liu L, Lorigan GA. Solid-State NMR 31P Paramagnetic Relaxation Enhancement Membrane Protein Immersion Depth Measurements. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2014;118(16):4370–4377. doi: 10.1021/jp500267y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bertini I, Luchinat C. NMR of paramagnetic substances (vol 150, pg X, 1996) Coordin Chem Rev. 1998;170:283–288. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Linser R, Chevelkov V, Diehl A, Reif B. Sensitivity enhancement using paramagnetic relaxation in MAS solid-state NMR of perdeuterated proteins. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 2007;189(2):209–216. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2007.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang S, Matsuda I, Long F, Ishii Y. Spectral editing at ultra-fast magic-angle-spinning in solid-state NMR: facilitating protein sequential signal assignment by HIGHLIGHT approach. Journal of Biomolecular NMR. 2016;64(2):131–141. doi: 10.1007/s10858-016-0014-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Vijayan V, Demers JP, Biernat J, Mandelkow E, Becker S, Lange A. Low-Power Solid-State NMR Experiments for Resonance Assignment under Fast Magic-Angle Spinning. ChemPhysChem. 2009;10(13):2205–2208. doi: 10.1002/cphc.200900439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mroue KH, MacKinnon N, Xu J, Zhu P, McNerny E, Kohn DH, Morris MD, Ramamoorthy A. High-Resolution Structural Insights into Bone: A Solid-State NMR Relaxation Study Utilizing Paramagnetic Doping. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2012;116(38):11656–11661. doi: 10.1021/jp307935g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang S, Parthasarathy S, Xiao Y, Nishiyama Y, Long F, Matsuda I, Endo Y, Nemoto T, Yamauchi K, Asakura T, Takeda M, Terauchi T, Kainosho M, Ishii Y. Nano-mole scale sequential signal assignment by 1H-detected protein solid-state NMR. Chemical Communications. 2015;51(81):15055–15058. doi: 10.1039/c5cc04618a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sun S, Yan S, Guo C, Li M, Hoch JC, Williams JC, Polenova T. A Time-Saving Strategy for MAS NMR Spectroscopy by Combining Nonuniform Sampling and Paramagnetic Relaxation Assisted Condensed Data Collection. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2012;116(46):13585–13596. doi: 10.1021/jp3005794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ward ME, Wang S, Krishnamurthy S, Hutchins H, Fey M, Brown LS, Ladizhansky V. High-resolution paramagnetically enhanced solid-state NMR spectroscopy of membrane proteins at fast magic angle spinning. Journal of Biomolecular NMR. 2014;58(1):37–47. doi: 10.1007/s10858-013-9802-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bauer T, Dotta C, Balacescu L, Gath J, Hunkeler A, Böckmann A, Meier BH. Line-Broadening in Low-Temperature Solid-State NMR Spectra of Fibrils. Journal of Biomolecular NMR. 2017;67(1):51–61. doi: 10.1007/s10858-016-0083-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Weber DK, Gehman JD, Separovic F, Sani MA. Copper Modulation of Amyloid Beta 42 Interactions with Model Membranes. Aust J Chem. 2012;65(5):472–479. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bertini I, Emsley L, Lelli M, Luchinat C, Mao J, Pintacuda G. Ultrafast MAS Solid-State NMR Permits Extensive 13C and 1H Detection in Paramagnetic Metalloproteins. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2010;132(16):5558–5559. doi: 10.1021/ja100398q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mroue KH, Zhang R, Zhu P, McNerny E, Kohn DH, Morris MD, Ramamoorthy A. Acceleration of natural-abundance solid-state MAS NMR measurements on bone by paramagnetic relaxation from gadolinium-DTPA. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 2014;244(Supplement C):90–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2014.04.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ullrich SJ, Hölper S, Glaubitz C. Paramagnetic doping of a 7TM membrane protein in lipid bilayers by Gd3+-complexes for solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Journal of Biomolecular NMR. 2014;58(1):27–35. doi: 10.1007/s10858-013-9800-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tesch DM, Nevzorov AA. Sensitivity enhancement and contrasting information provided by free radicals in oriented-sample NMR of bicelle-reconstituted membrane proteins. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 2014;239(Supplement C):9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2013.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yamamoto K, Xu J, Kawulka KE, Vederas JC, Ramamoorthy A. Use of a copper-chelated lipid speeds up NMR measurements from membrane proteins. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132(20):6929–31. doi: 10.1021/ja102103n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Koroloff SN, Tesch DM, Awosanya EO, Nevzorov AA. Sensitivity enhancement for membrane proteins reconstituted in parallel and perpendicular oriented bicelles obtained by using repetitive cross-polarization and membrane-incorporated free radicals. Journal of Biomolecular NMR. 2017;67(2):135–144. doi: 10.1007/s10858-017-0090-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Odermatt A, Becker S, Khanna VK, Kurzydlowski K, Leisner E, Pette D, MacLennan DH. Sarcolipin regulates the activity of SERCA1, the fast-twitch skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1998;273(20):12360–12369. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.20.12360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mascioni A, Karim C, Barany G, Thomas DD, Veglia G. Structure and Orientation of Sarcolipin in Lipid Environments. Biochemistry. 2002;41(2):475–482. doi: 10.1021/bi011243m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tupling AR, Asahi M, MacLennan DH. Sarcolipin overexpression in rat slow twitch muscle inhibits sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ uptake and impairs contractile function. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2002;277(47):44740–44746. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206171200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Buffy JJ, Buck-Koehntop BA, Porcelli F, Traaseth NJ, Thomas DD, Veglia G. Defining the Intramembrane Binding Mechanism of Sarcolipin to Calcium ATPase Using Solution NMR Spectroscopy. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2006;358(2):420–429. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bhupathy P, Babu GJ, Periasamy M. SARCOLIPIN AND PHOSPHOLAMBAN AS REGULATORS OF CARDIAC SARCOPLASMIC RETICULUM CA(2+) ATPASE. Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology. 2007;42(5):903–911. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2007.03.738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Traaseth NJ, Ha KN, Verardi R, Shi L, Buffy JJ, Masterson LR, Veglia G. Structural and Dynamic Basis of Phospholamban and Sarcolipin Inhibition of Ca2+-ATPase. Biochemistry. 2008;47(1):3–13. doi: 10.1021/bi701668v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Buck B, Zamoon J, Kirby TL, DeSilva TM, Karim C, Thomas D, Veglia G. Overexpression, purification, and characterization of recombinant Ca-ATPase regulators for high-resolution solution and solid-state NMR studies. Protein Expr Purif. 2003;30(2):253–61. doi: 10.1016/s1046-5928(03)00127-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Fung BM, Khitrin AK, Ermolaev K. An Improved Broadband Decoupling Sequence for Liquid Crystals and Solids. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 2000;142(1):97–101. doi: 10.1006/jmre.1999.1896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gopinath T, Verardi R, Traaseth NJ, Veglia G. Sensitivity Enhancement of Separated Local Field Experiments: Application to Membrane Proteins. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2010;114(15):5089–5095. doi: 10.1021/jp909778a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Vinogradov E, Madhu PK, Vega S. High-resolution proton solid-state NMR spectroscopy by phase-modulated Lee–Goldburg experiment. Chemical Physics Letters. 1999;314(5):443–450. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gopinath T, Mote KR, Veglia G. Simultaneous acquisition of 2D and 3D solid-state NMR experiments for sequential assignment of oriented membrane protein samples. Journal of Biomolecular NMR. 2015;62(1):53–61. doi: 10.1007/s10858-015-9916-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Traaseth NJ, Gopinath T, Veglia G. On the Performance of Spin Diffusion NMR Techniques in Oriented Solids: Prospects for Resonance Assignments and Distance Measurements from Separated Local Field Experiments. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2010;114(43):13872–13880. doi: 10.1021/jp105718r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Liu C, Liu J, Xu X, Xiang S, Wang S. Gd3+-chelated lipid accelerates solid-state NMR spectroscopy of seven-transmembrane proteins. Journal of Biomolecular NMR. 2017;68(3):203–214. doi: 10.1007/s10858-017-0120-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Marassi FM, Opella SJ. A solid-state NMR index of helical membrane protein structure and topology. J Magn Reson. 2000;144(1):150–5. doi: 10.1006/jmre.2000.2035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Denny JK, Wang J, Cross TA, Quine JR. PISEMA powder patterns and PISA wheels. J Magn Reson. 2001;152(2):217–26. doi: 10.1006/jmre.2001.2405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Opella SJ, Marassi FM, Gesell JJ, Valente AP, Kim Y, Oblatt-Montal M, Montal M. Structures of the M2 channel-lining segments from nicotinic acetylcholine and NMDA receptors by NMR spectroscopy. Nat Struct Biol. 1999;6(4):374–9. doi: 10.1038/7610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Knox RW, Lu GJ, Opella SJ, Nevzorov AA. A resonance assignment method for oriented-sample solid-state NMR of proteins. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132(24):8255–7. doi: 10.1021/ja102932n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mote KR, Gopinath T, Traaseth NJ, Kitchen J, Gor’kov PL, Brey WW, Veglia G. Multidimensional oriented solid-state NMR experiments enable the sequential assignment of uniformly 15N labeled integral membrane proteins in magnetically aligned lipid bilayers. Journal of Biomolecular NMR. 2011;51(3):339. doi: 10.1007/s10858-011-9571-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Szeverenyi NM, Sullivan MJ, Maciel GE. Observation of spin exchange by two-dimensional fourier transform 13C cross polarization-magic-angle spinning. Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969) 1982;47(3):462–475. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Suter D, Ernst RR. Spin diffusion in resolved solid-state NMR spectra. Physical Review B. 1985;32(9):5608–5627. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.32.5608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Xu J, Struppe J, Ramamoorthy A. Two-dimensional homonuclear chemical shift correlation established by the cross-relaxation driven spin diffusion in solids. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2008;128(5):052308. doi: 10.1063/1.2826323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Knox RW, Lu GJ, Opella SJ, Nevzorov AA. A Resonance Assignment Method for Oriented-Sample Solid-State NMR of Proteins. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2010;132(24):8255–8257. doi: 10.1021/ja102932n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Tang W, Knox RW, Nevzorov AA. A spectroscopic assignment technique for membrane proteins reconstituted in magnetically aligned bicelles. Journal of Biomolecular NMR. 2012;54(3):307–316. doi: 10.1007/s10858-012-9673-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Van Melckebeke H, Schanda P, Gath J, Wasmer C, Verel R, Lange A, Meier BH, Böckmann A. Probing water accessibility in HET-s(218-289) amyloid fibrils by solid-state NMR. Journal of molecular biology. 2011;405(3):765–772. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Weingarth M, van der Cruijsen EAW, Ostmeyer J, Lievestro S, Roux B, Baldus M. Quantitative Analysis of the Water Occupancy around the Selectivity Filter of a K+ Channel in Different Gating Modes. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2014;136(5):2000–2007. doi: 10.1021/ja411450y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Xu F, Cross TA. Water: Foldase activity in catalyzing polypeptide conformational rearrangements. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1999;96(16):9057–9061. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.16.9057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hu F, Schmidt-Rohr K, Hong M. NMR Detection of pH-Dependent Histidine–Water Proton Exchange Reveals the Conduction Mechanism of a Transmembrane Proton Channel. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2012;134(8):3703–3713. doi: 10.1021/ja2081185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Thennarasu S, Huang R, Lee DK, Yang P, Maloy L, Chen Z, Ramamoorthy A. Limiting an Antimicrobial Peptide to the Lipid–Water Interface Enhances Its Bacterial Membrane Selectivity: A Case Study of MSI-367. Biochemistry. 2010;49(50):10595–10605. doi: 10.1021/bi101394r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Dicke A, Gopinath T, Wang Y, Veglia G. Probing Residue-Specific Water–Protein Interactions in Oriented Lipid Membranes via Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2016;120(42):10959–10968. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b08282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Nevzorov AA. Orientational and motional narrowing of solid-state NMR lineshapes of uniaxially aligned membrane proteins. J Phys Chem B. 2011;115(51):15406–14. doi: 10.1021/jp2092847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Prosser RS, Volkov VB, Shiyanovskaya IV. Novel Chelate-Induced Magnetic Alignment of Biological Membranes. Biophysical Journal. 1998;75(5):2163–2169. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77659-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ravula T, Ramadugu SK, Di Mauro G, Ramamoorthy A. Bioinspired, Size-Tunable Self-Assembly of Polymer–Lipid Bilayer Nanodiscs. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2017;56(38):11466–11470. doi: 10.1002/anie.201705569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Research Misconduct Found]

RESOURCES