Abstract
The first example of meta-selective C–H arylations of arene alcohol-based substrates is described. The strategy involves the combination of the transient norbornene strategy with the quinoline-based acetal scaffold to achieve the formation of biaryl compounds. Both a two-step meta-arylation/scaffold cleavage process and a total telescoping procedure are described, highlighting the convenient attributes of attachment, removal, and recovery of the acetal scaffold. Moreover, the meta-arylated compounds can be further derivatized via ortho-selective functionalizations. These processes establish a foundation for catalytic polyfunctionalization of alcohol-based compounds.
Keywords: meta-C-H arylation, palladium, quinoline acetal, alcohols, molecular scaffold
Graphical abstract

Transition metal catalyzed site-selective C–H functionalization has been a broad and highly impactful enterprise in the fields of synthetic chemistry and materials science.[1] A primary strategy to achieve site specificity is to employ substrates with directing capabilities that can position the catalytic complex to achieve selective bond functionalization. In terms of C(sp2)–H functionalization, this strategy has been widely executed for ortho-selective processes, as proximity effects are readily achieved. More recently, innovative approaches in directed C–H functionalization have now been achieved to attain meta-selectivity.[2] Select strategies include designer templates that orient the metal in close proximity to a meta C–H bond,[3] steric-controlled processes,[4] or transformations that are predicated on a specific mechanistic pathway selective for meta reactivity.[5] A separate approach using Pd catalysis was developed by the Yu and Dong groups independently,[6,7] where they draw inspiration from the Catellani reaction involving norbornene insertion/deinsertion[8] to achieve metalation at the meta position from an initial ortho-directed functionalization (Figure 1). Further studies illustrated the capacity of this palladium-catalyzed process to be utilized in derivatives of phenylacetic acids, phenethyl amines, benzyl amines, anilines, and phenols.[9]
Figure 1.

Approach to alcohol-based scaffold to direct functionalization.
We[10] and others[11] have been interested in the catalytic C(sp2)–H functionalization of alcohol-based substrates, namely in the development of molecular scaffolds that can direct a metal species to a specific site.[12] Our recent efforts have focused on the design of acetal-based scaffolds that feature pyridyl or quinolinyl groups for the functionalization of arene-based alcohols (Figure 1).[10] These scaffolds are readily covalently attached to alcohols, and when attached will induce ortho-selective Pd-catalyzed C–H alkenylations and arylations. These scaffolds can circumvent some of the challenges encountered in directed functionalizations with alcohol-based substrates (e.g., oxidative decomposition pathways), and the facile attachment, cleavage, and recovery methods for these scaffolds enable straightforward processing and telescoping procedures. These processes were designed for ortho-selective reactivity; an analogous development in meta-functionalizations would significantly expand the scope of this methodology. Herein, we report the utilization of the norbornene strategy juxtaposed with our scaffolding protocol to achieve meta-selective functionalizations of alcohol-based substrates. To our knowledge, this represents the first meta-selective arylation of arene alcohol-based substrates.
We first evaluated the reaction of 3-methoxybenzyl alcohol with our respective heterocyclic scaffolds attached (1a, Scheme 1).[13] When these substrates were treated under oxidative arylation conditions using norbornene as the transient mediator, minimal meta-arylation products (3aa) were observed. Additionally, we observed significant amounts of recovered starting material and observable quantities of a benzocyclobutane byproduct (4). We were still encouraged by this reactivity, albeit low, and anticipated that modifications may garner improved results. To our delight, we found that norbornene 5b (NBE-CO2Me), developed by Yu for this transient strategy,[9a-g] improved the arylation, with no observation of benzocyclobutane byproduct. The quinolinyl-based scaffold also afforded a significant enhancement in reactivity (49% vs. 15% yield), and this promising lead encouraged us to probe this reaction further.
Scheme 1.

Preliminary evaluation of meta-selective arylations using alcohol scaffold.
We next evaluated other parameters of the transformation (Table 1). Pd(TFA)2 bolstered reactivity, affording the product in 65% yield (entry 1). 4 equiv each of PhI and AgOAc were optimal (entry 2), and different silver salts were minimally effective (entries 3-6). Investigations into ligands were revealing. 2-Hydroxypyridine ligands, oftentimes effective for similar meta-C–H functionalization processes,[9b-f] did not improve reactivity here (entries 7-8). In evaluating amino acid derivatives, we found that both N-trifluoroacetylglycine (TFA-Gly-OH) and N-trifluoroacetyl-β-alanine (TFA-β-Ala-OH) were similarly optimal, affording the arylated product (3aa) in much improved yield (78%, with 8% rsm, Table 1, entries 17, 18). Considering availability of the amino acids, we chose using TFA-Gly-OH in the optimal conditions for further studies. The reaction could be performed without ligand in decreased but still measurable yield; AgOAc, however, was essential (entries 21, 22).[14]
Table 1.
Optimization of the meta-C–H arylation of the QuA-attached scaffold.
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Ligand | Additive | Time (h) | Yield [%][a] | Rsm [%][a,b] |
| 1 | Ac-Gly-OH | AgOAc | 46 | 65 | 17 |
| 2[c] | Ac-Gly-OH | AgOAc | 72 | 59 | 21 |
| 3 | Ac-Gly-OH | Ag2CO3 | 46 | 26 | 65 |
| 4 | Ac-Gly-OH | AgOPiv | 46 | 12 | 82 |
| 5 | Ac-Gly-OH | AgOTf | 46 | nd | nd |
| 6 | Ac-Gly-OH | AgTFA | 22.5 | nd | nd |
| 7 |
|
AgOAc | 24 | 33 | 52 |
| 8 |
|
AgOAc | 24 | 23 | 69 |
| 9 | Ac-Ala-OH | AgOAc | 46 | 57 | 20 |
| 10 | Ac-t-Leu-OH | AgOAc | 46 | 64 | 12 |
| 11 | Ac-Phe-OH | AgOAc | 46 | 53 | 24 |
| 12 | Ac-β-Ala-OH | AgOAc | 46 | 66 | 8 |
| 13 | Boc-Gly-OH | AgOAc | 46 | 69 | 8 |
| 14 | Formyl-Gly-OH | AgOAc | 46 | 49 | 35 |
| 15 | Bz-Gly-OH | AgOAc | 46 | 23 | 61 |
| 16 | TFA-Gly-OH | AgOAc | 46 | 75 | 7 |
| 17 | TFA-β-Ala-OH | AgOAc | 24 | 78 | 8 |
| 18 | TFA-Gly-OH | AgOAc | 24 | 78 | 8 |
| 19 | TFA-Gly-OH | AgOAc | 15 | 74 | 13 |
| 20 | none | AgOAc | 24 | 60 | 9 |
| 21 | TFA-Gly-OH | KOAc | 24 | 4 | 95 |
| 22 | TFA-Gly-OH | none | 24 | 0 | 66 |
NMR yield using 1-octene as a standard. nd: Not detected.
Rsm: recovered starting material.
3 equiv each 2a, AgOAc.
The substrate scope was then ascertained (Scheme 2). We first evaluated the aryl iodide component, and we found that a variety of substituted aromatic groups could be employed. Both electron rich and electron poor aryl iodides were reactive, and the transformation showed good functional group compatibility (e.g., ether, ester, ketone, carbamate, nitro, trifluoromethyl, halogen). Aryl iodides bearing a para-, meta-, or ortho-substituent afforded the corresponding products in good to excellent yields. An alkyl iodide could also be utilized, although the alkylated arene was obtained in only modest yield (3ao).
Scheme 2.

Iodide scope in meta-selective arylations.
[a] Isolated with 9% rsm. [b] Ethylenediamine workup was not performed. [c] Isolated with 5% rsm. [d] Isolated with 13% rsm. [e] Isolated with 18% rsm.
A range of scaffold-attached benzylic alcohol substrates were also evaluated (Scheme 3), using iodobenzoates as the coupling agent.[15] The transformation tended to work better for compounds bearing electron rich substituents, such as ethers, alkyls, arenes, and carbamates. Electron withdrawing groups (e.g., halides in 3gp, 3jn) were still tolerated, however. This procedure appeared to work most effectively with meta-substituted benzylic alcohol-based substrates; ortho-substituted cases were also competent but in diminished yields (3hp, 3in, 3jn, 3kp, 3mn). The 3,4-methylenedioxy group was effective (3ln, 61% yield), as was a heterocyclic compound (3mn, 47% yield). The meta-arylation could be extended to secondary alcohol-based compounds (3np, 75% yield). Finally, for cases where mono- and di-arylation were possible, both products were observed.[16]
Scheme 3.

Arene alcohol substrate scope in meta-selective arylations.
[a] Using 20 mol % Pd(TFA)2 and 40 mol % TFA-Gly-OH. [b] Estimated 85% purity. [c] Yield refers to isolation of the corresponding alcohol after scaffold cleavage.
A primary attribute in our scaffolding approach is the capitalization on the lability of the acetal for direct scaffold cleavage and recovery. Scheme 4 is illustrative in the context of this meta-arylation. A sequential procedure of arylation with immediate subsequent scaffold cleavage afforded biaryl alcohol 6an in 83% yield.[17] Methyl acetal-derived scaffold (QuAOMe, 7) was also recovered in 94% yield; we have shown that this compound can be reused in further attachment sequences.[10b] Furthermore, a telescoping procedure for this meta-arylation process using our quinolinyl scaffold could also be executed. Benzylic alcohol 8a was converted to the meta-arylated alcohol (6an) in 74% yield without any intermediate purifications.
Scheme 4.

Scaffold cleavage and telescoping protocol.
Our scaffolding approach to meta-arylation complements our existing ortho-functionalization strategies. To that end, we have demonstrated that the meta-arylated products can undergo subsequent functionalizations (Scheme 5). Under our previously described conditions, the ortho-C–H arylation of compound 3an affords the secondary arylated product (10) in 67% yield. Olefination was also successful; the C–H alkenylation of compound 3ah affords alkene product 12 in 66% yield. We envision our scaffold could be utilized for the facile diversified syntheses of polysubstituted arene alcohols via select functionalization strategies.
Scheme 5.

Polyfunctionalization via the scaffolding strategy.
In summary, we have developed the site selective meta-C–H arylation of benzylic alcohols via palladium catalysis by incorporating the norbornene transient mediator strategy into our quinoline-based acetal scaffold. The particular use of amino acid-based ligands for this reaction is distinct in the norbornene strategy, and suggests a unique cooperation of ligand and scaffold in this functionalization process. The transformation shows considerable scope and functional group compatibility, and the desired biaryl compounds can be obtained in generally moderate to high yields. Scaffold cleavage and recovery, in addition to a telescoping protocol, could be achieved in good yields without purification of any intermediates. The meta-arylation can also be combined with ortho-arylation or olefinations to afford polysubstituted arenes, establishing a foundational platform for ready diversifications of aromatic systems. Considering the synthetic versatility of the alcohol functional group, we anticipate this scaffolding strategy toward functionalization will enable the facile and direct syntheses of an array of arene compounds. Studies on further reactivity based on our approach will be reported in due course.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The University of Georgia is acknowledged for support of this research. Q.L. was supported by the NSF and EPA through the Network for Sustainable Molecular Design and Synthesis program (NSF-CHE-1339674).
Footnotes
Supporting information for this article is given via a link at the end of the document.
References
- 1.For select reviews, see:; a) Alberico D, Scott ME, Lautens M. Chem Rev. 2007;107:174–238. doi: 10.1021/cr0509760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Chen X, Engle KM, Wang DH, Yu J-Q. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:5094–5115. doi: 10.1002/anie.200806273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 2009;121:5196–5217. [Google Scholar]; c) Lyons TW, Sanford MS. Chem Rev. 2010;110:1147–1169. doi: 10.1021/cr900184e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) McMurray L, O’Hara F, Gaunt MJ. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40:1885–1898. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15013h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Wencel-Delord J, Dröge T, Liu F, Glorius F. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40:4740–4761. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15083a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Yamaguchi J, Yamaguchi AD, Itami K. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2012;51:8960–9009. doi: 10.1002/anie.201201666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 2012;124:9092–9142. [Google Scholar]
- 2.For recent reviews, see:; a) Yang J. Org Biomol Chem. 2015;13:1930–1941. doi: 10.1039/c4ob02171a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Dey A, Agasti S, Maiti D. Org Biomol Chem. 2016;14:5440–5453. doi: 10.1039/c6ob00395h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.For select examples, see:; a) Leow D, Li G, Mei TS, Yu J-Q. Nature. 2012;486:518–522. doi: 10.1038/nature11158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Dai H-X, Li G, Zhang X-G, Stepan AF, Yu J-Q. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:7567–7571. doi: 10.1021/ja400659s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Wan L, Dastbaravardeh N, Li G, Yu J-Q. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:18056–18059. doi: 10.1021/ja410760f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Lee S, Lee H, Tan KL. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:18778–18781. doi: 10.1021/ja4107034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Tang R-Y, Li G, Yu J-Q. Nature. 2014;507:215–220. doi: 10.1038/nature12963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Bera M, Modak A, Patra T, Maji A, Maiti D. Org Lett. 2014;16:5760–5763. doi: 10.1021/ol502823c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Deng Y, Yu J-Q. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2015;54:888–891. doi: 10.1002/anie.201409860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 2015;127:902–905. [Google Scholar]; h) Chu L, Shang M, Tanaka K, Chen Q, Pissarnitski N, Streckfuss E, Yu J-Q. ACS Cent Sci. 2015;1:394–399. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.5b00312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i) Li S, Ji H, Cai L, Li G. Chem Sci. 2015;6:5595–5600. doi: 10.1039/c5sc01737h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; j) Bera M, Maji A, Sahoo SK, Maiti D. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2015;54:8515–8519. doi: 10.1002/anie.201503112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 2015;127:8635–8639. [Google Scholar]; k) Patra T, Watile R, Agasti S, Naveen T, Maiti D. Chem Commun. 2016;52:2027–2030. doi: 10.1039/c5cc09446a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; l) Li S, Cai L, Ji H, Yang L, Li G. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10443. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; m) Dutta U, Modak A, Bhaskararao B, Bera M, Bag S, Mondal A, Lupton DW, Sunoj RB, Maiti D. ACS Catal. 2017;7:3162–3168. [Google Scholar]
- 4.For select examples, see:; a) Cho J-Y, Iverson CN, Smith MR., III J Am Chem Soc. 2000;122:12868–12869. [Google Scholar]; b) Cho J-Y, Tse MK, Holmes D, Maleczka RE, Jr, Smith MR., III Science. 2002;295:305–308. doi: 10.1126/science.1067074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Murphy JM, Liao X, Hartwig JF. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:15434–15435. doi: 10.1021/ja076498n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Cheng C, Hartwig JF. Science. 2014;343:853–857. doi: 10.1126/science.1248042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.For select examples, see:; a) Phipps RJ, Gaunt MJ. Science. 2009;323:1593–1597. doi: 10.1126/science.1169975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Duong HA, Gilligan RE, Cooke ML, Phipps RJ, Gaunt MJ. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50:463–466. doi: 10.1002/anie.201004704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 2011;123:483–486. [Google Scholar]; c) Saidi O, Marafie J, Ledger AEW, Liu PM, Mahon MF, Kociok-Köhn G, Whittlesey MK, Frost CG. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:19298–19301. doi: 10.1021/ja208286b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Hofmann N, Ackermann L. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:5877–5884. doi: 10.1021/ja401466y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Martínez-Martínez AJ, Kennedy AR, Mulvey RE, O’Hara CT. Science. 2014;346:834–837. doi: 10.1126/science.1259662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Li J, Warratz S, Zell D, De Sarkar S, Ishikawa EE, Ackermann L. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:13894–13901. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b08435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang X-C, Gong W, Fang L-Z, Zhu R-Y, Li S, Engle KM, Yu J-Q. Nature. 2015;519:334–338. doi: 10.1038/nature14214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dong Z, Wang J, Dong G. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:5887–5890. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b02809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.a) Catellani M, Frignan F, Rangoni A. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 1997;36:119–122. [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 1997;109:142–145. [Google Scholar]; b) Della Ca’ N, Fontana M, Motti E, Catellani M. Acc Chem Res. 2016;49:1389–1400. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.a) Shen P-X, Wang X-C, Wang P, Zhu R-Y, Yu J-Q. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:11574–11577. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b08914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Wang P, Farmer ME, Huo X, Jain P, Shen P-X, Ishoey M, Bradner JE, Wisniewski SR, Eastgate MD, Yu J-Q. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:9269–9276. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b04966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Wang P, Li G-C, Jain P, Farmer ME, He J, Shen P-X, Yu J-Q. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:14092–14099. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b08942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Shi H, Wang P, Suzuki S, Farmer ME, Yu J-Q. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:14876–14879. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b11055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Wang P, Farmer ME, Yu J-Q. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017;56:5125–5129. doi: 10.1002/anie.201701803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 2017;129:5207–5211. [Google Scholar]; f) Li G-C, Wang P, Farmer ME, Yu J-Q. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017;56:6874–6877. doi: 10.1002/anie.201702686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 2017;129:6978–6981. [Google Scholar]; g) Chen G, Wang P, Yu J-Q. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017;56:8183–8186. doi: 10.1002/anie.201704411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 2017;129:8295–8298. [Google Scholar]; h) Han J, Zhang L, Zhu Y, Zheng Y, Chen X, Huang Z-B, Shi D-Q, Zhao Y. Chem Commun. 2016;52:6903–6906. doi: 10.1039/c6cc02384c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i) Ding Q, Ye S, Cheng G, Wang P, Farmer ME, Yu J-Q. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139:417–425. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b11097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; j) Ling P-X, Chen K, Shi B-F. Chem Commun. 2017;53:2166–2169. doi: 10.1039/c7cc00110j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.a) Knight BJ, Rothbaum JO, Ferreira EM. Chem Sci. 2016;7:1982–1987. doi: 10.1039/c5sc03948g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Li Q, Knight BJ, Ferreira EM. Chem Eur J. 2016;22:13054–13058. doi: 10.1002/chem.201602844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.a) Simmons EM, Hartwig JF. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:17092–17095. doi: 10.1021/ja1086547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Lee S, Lee H, Tan KL. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:18778–18781. doi: 10.1021/ja4107034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Chu L, Shang M, Tanaka K, Chen Q, Pissarnitski N, Streckfuss E, Yu J-Q. ACS Cent Sci. 2015;21:394–399. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.5b00312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Guo K, Chen X, Guan M, Zhao Y. Org Lett. 2015;17:1802–1805. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b00594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Guo K, Chen X, Zhang J, Zhao Y. Chem Eur J. 2015;21:17474–17478. doi: 10.1002/chem.201503284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Ren Z, Schulz JE, Dong G. Org Lett. 2015;17:2696–2699. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b01098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Chen X, Han J, Zhu Y, Yuan C, Zhang J, Zhao Y. Chem Commun. 2016;52:10241–10244. doi: 10.1039/c6cc05560e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h) Shao L-Y, Li C, Guo Y, Yu K-K, Zhao F-Y, Qiao W-L, Liu H-W, Liao D-H, Ji Y-F. RSC Adv. 2016;6:78875–78880. [Google Scholar]
- 12.For a review on relevant strategies toward C–H functionalization of alcohol substrates, see,; Mo F, Tabor JR, Dong G. Chem Lett. 2014;43:264–271. [Google Scholar]
- 13.We have previously described the syntheses and attachment methods for these scaffolds. The pyridyl acetal substrate was synthesized from PyAOH (TsOH•H2O, MgSO4). For the quinolinyl acetal substrates, we found that the QuAOBz strategy (TFA, then K2CO3) was generally effective for attachment. See the Supporting Information for details.
- 14.Procedurally, the reaction is generally concluded by adding ~0.1 mL ethylenediamine and stirring for 2 h to remove any Pd complexes and facilitate purification. See the Supporting Information for details.
- 15.The choice of methyl vs. ethyl benzoate was simply for ease of chromatographic purification.
- 16.Substrates based on homobenzylic and bishomobenzylic alcohols, which were reactive in our ortho-selective functionalizations, did not produce the desired meta-arylated species when evaluated here.
- 17.The slightly lower yield of compound 3an in Scheme 2 relative to compound 6an likely reflects the small amount of acetal cleavage over the course of the arylation and purification.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
