Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 28.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron Lett. 2018 Jan 31;59(9):807–810. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2018.01.040

One-step, stereoselective synthesis of octahydrochromanes via the Prins reaction and their cannabinoid activities

Shuneize Slater a, Pradeep B Lasonkar a, Saqlain Haider a, Moneerah J Alqahtani b, Amar G Chittiboyina a,, Ikhlas A Khan a,b
PMCID: PMC5986293  NIHMSID: NIHMS938154  PMID: 29880989

Abstract

Novel, functionalized octahydrochromene derivatives were synthesized in a single step via the Prins reaction. Enantiomerically pure (+)-isopulegol was reacted with benzaldehyde to stereoselectively yield the corresponding octahydro-2H-chromen-4-ol derivative containing five stereocenters. A total of 10 compounds were synthesized by altering the enantiomer of isopulegol and the substituted benzaldehyde, and the resulting enantiopure octahydrochromenes were screened in vitro against the cannabinoid receptor isoforms CB1 and CB2. Compounds containing an olefin at the C4 position [(+)-3c, (-)-3c, (-)-7c, (-)-9c and (-)-11c] of the octahydrochromene scaffold were found to exhibit reasonable displacement of [3H] CP55,940 from the CB receptors, whereas the corresponding hydroxy analogs [(+)-3a, (+)-3b, (-)-3a, (-)-3b and (+)-5a] had very little or no effect

Keywords: Octahydrochromene, Prins cyclization, Enantioselectivity, Cannabinoid receptors

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name nihms938154u1.jpg

1. Introduction

The cannabinoid receptors, CB1 and CB2, comprise part of the endocannabinoid system (ECS) along with their endogenous ligands and their related enzymes and transporters. This system is involved in many human diseases and may provide potential targets in drug development.1 Various research groups have reported that cannabinoid receptors are overexpressed in different cancers and that cannabinoids are able to reduce tumor growth and progression by modulating cancer cell proliferation, tumor angiogenesis, and metastasis.2, 3 CB1 receptors are mainly located in the central nervous system (CNS) with low expression in the periphery, and have been shown to protect the brain and spinal neurons from excitotoxic damage,4 relieve gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms,5 and participate in numerous other important functions. CB2 receptors are localized on immune cells and participate in the immunosuppressive and antinociceptive effects of the cannabinoids.6

Plant-derived cannabinoids, or phytocannabinoids, have emerged as a major class of compounds with therapeutic potential. Cannabis has been used medicinally for the treatment of neurological disorders such as epilepsy.7 Cannabidiol 1a (CBD, Fig. 1), is the major non-psychoactive component of Cannabis sativa and Cannabis indica and has been proposed to possess anticonvulsive, neuroprotective, and anti-inflammatory properties in humans, and thus is protective against epilepsy, anxiety, psychosis, and other CNS diseases.8

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Selected biologically active compounds based on a chromane scaffold – cannabinoids, macheriols and octahydrochromanes

Cannabidiol 1a and tetrahydrocannabinol 1b (THC) are tetrahydrocannabinoids that differ only by the formation of a carbon-oxygen bond in THC to form a pyran ring (Fig. 1). The machaeriols 1c are another class of compounds that are structurally similar to THC; however, the ring junction stereochemistry is inverted with an additional stereocenter in the A-ring at the C9 position (Fig. 1). Machaeriols are therefore not tetrahydrocannabinoids, but are instead hexahydrocannabinoids. The inversion of stereochemistry at these centers produce different biological properties than those observed with THC. Hexahydrocannabinol analogs, such as LYR-8 1d (Fig. 1), are cannabinoid-like compounds with high similarity to the machaeriols which possess little affinity for the CB1 and CB2 receptors, yet directly inhibit the growth of cancer cells, induce apoptosis of cancer cells, and inhibit endothelial cell proliferation and angiogenesis.9 Recently, Volcho10 and co-workers reported the highly potent analgesic activity of several octahydro-2H-chromen-4-ols derived from isopulegol. The resulting octahydrochromenol product of thiophene-2-carbaldehyde, isopulegol, exhibited analgesic activity in the acetic acid-induced writhing test as well as hotplate test without any apparent acute toxicity.

Synthetically, these compounds have been prepared using one-step transformations. For example, tetrahydrocannabinoid compounds have been stereoselectively synthesized via boron trifluoride catalyzed arylation of a homocuprate, 11 whereas hexahydrochromanes were prepared via hetero Diels-Alder cycloaddition.12 Octahydrochromenols were previously synthesized via the Prins reaction of homoallylic alcohols with substituted aryl aldehydes. Lewis acids such as Sc(OTf)313 or Montmorillonite K1014 with and without p-TSA10 were employed to produce octahydrochromene/ol compounds; however, little information regarding the stereoselectivity and chirality of the homoallylic alcohols was reported.

2. Results and Discussion

Compounds containing a tetrahydropyran moiety are widely used as precursors for the synthesis of biologically active compounds and can be synthesized using the Prins reaction.15 The acid-catalyzed Prins reaction of pulegols with various aldehydes containing electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substituents is often used for the synthesis of biologically active octahydro-2H-chromen-4-ols.16

Starting from (+)-isopulegol (+)-2, Prins cyclization with 2,6-dimethylbenzaldehyde (1) in the presence of a Lewis acid, resulted in the formation of one major (-)-3a and two minor compounds (-)-3b,c (Scheme 1). Several Lewis acids were screened, including metal triflates, and boron trifluoride diethyl etherate (0.05 equiv.) was found to be superior for this transformation. The stereochemistry of the major compound was determined by 2D-NMR and NOESY experiments. Strong NOE correlations were observed between H8a and H7 as well as H8a and H2, suggesting that H8a, H7 and H2 were in the syn-configuration. The syn-selectivity in the newly formed pyran ring can be envisioned as proceeding via formation of an oxonium ion with an aryl group occupying the equatorial position, thus both H8a and H2 are situated in the less hindered axial positions (Fig. 2). The minor compounds (-)-3b and (-)-3c also exhibited similar correlations, indicating the conserved stereo-preference at the newly created centers. Strong NOE correlations between H8a/H2 and the 4-CH3 group further confirmed the selectivity as the S-configuration for the major compound, chromenol 3a. Compound (-)-3c may either result from the dehydration of 3a,b or be derived from competitive proton elimination of the resulting tertiary carbocation formed after initial cyclization (Fig. 2).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Chiral pool approach for construction of the octohydrochromane scaffold. Reagents and conditions: a). BF3•OEt2 (0.05 equiv.), CH2Cl2, -40 °C to rt, 6 h, 72%, (3a: 3b: 3c = 3: 1: 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

One-pot ene, Prins reactions of (-)-citronellal with 2,6-dimethylbenzaldehyde and the formation of octahydrochromanes. Key NOE interactions are indicated by dotted arrows. Reagents and conditions: a). BF3•OEt2 (0.2 equiv.), CH2Cl2, -40 °C to rt, 4.5 h, 48%, (3a: 3b: 5a = 3.1: 1: 1.2).

Keeping in mind the structural similarity between the machaeriols and the octahydrochromenes, herein we report the one-step synthesis of ten novel octahydrochromene/ol derivatives using a stereoselective Prins cyclization as well as their biological activities against cannabinoid receptors.

The formation of 4 from (-)-3a via metal ammonia mediated chemo- and regio-selective hydrogenolysis17, 18 (Scheme 2) further corroborated the stereo-preference in the Prins reaction of benzaldehyde and (+)-isopulegol as (1S,3S,6S,7S,9S)-octahydro chromenol.19

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Confirmation of chirality at the newly created center. Single crystal X-ray structure of 4 with hydrogens omitted for clarity. Reagents and conditions: a). Na/NH3 (excess), -78 °C, 2 h, 86%.

The isopulegols are intramolecular products of the enereaction of citronellal. In order to assess the feasibility of a one-pot ene, Prins reactions, (-)-citronellal was subjected to the above reaction conditions in the presence of 1. Three major isolable compounds were formed and their structures were confirmed as (-)-3a, (-)-3b and (+)-5a (Table 1, entry 3). Again, syn-selectivity at C8a and C2 was observed for all three compounds, with (-)-3a formed as the major component (Fig. 2). The distribution of these compounds are in agreement with reported literature regarding the cyclization of (-)-citronellal to (+)-isopulegol and (-)-neo-isopulegol (3:1 ratio).20 For compound (+)-5a, the stereochemistry was determined on the basis of NOESY correlations, wherein H8a and H2 are in the syn-configuration and the S-configuration at C4 was established on the basis of the lack of NOE correlations between H8a/H2 and the 4-CH3 group (Fig. 2). The reaction of (-)-2 with 1, resulted in the formation of (+)-3a-c (Table 1, entry 2) while the treatment of (+)-isopulegol with 2,3-, 2,4-dimethyl benzaldehydes, and 2,3,6-trimethyl benzaldehyde with 0.2 equivalents of the Lewis acid for an extended time gave the dehydrated products, octahydrochromenes (-)-7c, (-)-9c and (-)-11c respectively, as the major compounds (Table 1, entries 4-6). Trimethyl benzaldehyde was prepared from 3,6-dimethyl salicylaldehyde, which was subjected to triflation using N-phenyl-bis(trifluoromethanesulfonimide) followed by a Pd(0) catalyzed Suzuki coupling reaction with methyl boronic acid.21

Table 1.

Substrate scope.

graphic file with name nihms938154u2.jpg
Entry Reactants (ArCHO, monoterpene) BF3•OEt2 Product yield (%)
Equiv. Temp. Time
1 R1,R4= Me; R2,R3=H; 1 (+)-2 0.05 -40 °C 6 h (-)-3a (36%) (-)-3b (12%) (-)-3c (24%)
2 R1,R4= Me; R2,R3=H; 1 (-)-2 0.05 -40 °C 6 h (+)-3a (34%) (+)-3b (11%) (+)-3c (20%)
3 R1,R4= Me; R2,R3=H; 1 (-)-citronellal 0.2 -40 °C 4.5 h (-)-3a (28%) (-)-3b (9%) (+)-5a (11%)
4 R1,R2= Me; R3,R4=H; 6 (+)-2 0.2 to rt 0 °C 12 h (-)-7c (58%)
5 R1,R3= Me; R2,R4=H; 8 (+)-2 0.2 0 °C 12 h (-)-9c (55%)
6 R1,R2,R4= Me; R3=H; 10 (+)-2 0.2 0 °C 12 h (-)-11c (62%)

All ten compounds were tested for cannabinoid activity with CB1 and/or CB2 receptors.22 As shown in Table 2, the initial testing of (-)-3a-c against CB1 and CB2 receptors showed that octahydrochromene (-)-3c, containing an olefin at the C-4 position was marginally active, whereas both chromenols (-)-3b and (-)-3a, were inactive. Similarly, compound (+)-5a, the product of the one-pot ene, Prins reaction of citronellal, was also inactive. Upon switching to the antipode (-)-pulegol (-)-2, compound (+)-3c was found to possess higher percent displacement of the radio ligand compared to the corresponding C-4 hydroxy analogs (+)-3b and (+)-3a. The marginally greater activity of these chromenes over chromenols stimulated the synthesis of additional chromene analogs from 2,3-dimethyl (6), 2,4-dimethyl (8), and 2,3,6-trimethyl benzaldehydes (10). No significant difference in CB1 selectivity for 2,3- and 2.6-disubstituted chromenes were observed; however, compound (-)-9c with para-substitution showed increased % displacement for the CB2 isoform.

Table 2.

CB1 and CB2 percent displacement data for octahydrochromanes and chromenes.

Compound CB1 Receptor CB2 Receptor
Dp* Ki (μM)±SEM IC50 (μM) Dp* Ki (μM)±SEM IC50 (μM)
(-)-3c n.a. 49.4
(-)-3b n.a. 8.1
(-)-3a n.a. n.a.
(+)-3c n.a. 68.5
(+)-3b 28.5 13.8
(+)-3a n.a. 8.1
(+)-5a n.a. n.a.
(-)-7c 18.6 71.9
(-)-9c 59.2 77.6 >1.905 ± 0.38 3.81
(-)-11c 16.6 74.9 >0.257 0.514
± 0.07
CP-55,940 0.001 0.002 0.0018 0.0036

Dp* percent displacement; n.a. not active. Compounds with ≥75% of Dp were assessed for Ki and IC50.

Interestingly, compound (-)-11c, which is the only compound with 3 methyl groups on the aromatic ring, has high % displacement for CB2 receptors (74.9%) but little affinity towards the CB1 isoform. Several of these compounds were found to be incompatible with the assay conditions due to their hydrophobicity, in such cases, additional DMSO (0.1-0.2%) was added to the media to overcome solubility and without deleterious effects on the assay protocol and outcome.

Since the tetrahydrocannabinoid cannabidiol and the hexahydrocannabinoid machaeriols are reported to possess anti-cancer activity, selected octahydrochromanes and chromenes were submitted to the NCI's 60-cell line screening program. Unfortunately, none of the compounds inhibited the growth of the examined cancer cells by a reasonable amount in spite of their marginal cannabinoid activities.

3. Conclusion

In summary, chiral pulegols and various benzaldehydes were utilized in the Prins reaction to produce octahydrochromene/ol compounds. The importance of the stereocenter configurations for biological activity was tested, and it was determined that the stereochemistry is not a factor in the activity of these compounds. However, the number and positions of the substituents on the aromatic ring may play a role in their activity. Determining SAR from this limited set of compounds is premature and is not the focus of the current findings. However, a focused set of compounds with better hydrophilicity will be explored to overcome solubility issues associated with these octahydrochromenes. Importantly, these one-pot reactions may serve as a starting point for new scaffolds with CB1 and/or CB2 selective agonist and antagonist activities which can be explored by varying the homoallylic alcohols and aldehydes used.

Supplementary Material

supplement

Highlights.

  • Stereoselective synthesis of octahydrochromanes were achieved with Prins reaction

  • Chiral homoallylic alcohols and benzaldehydes were utilized as starting materials

  • Stereospecificity and stereoselectivities for the newly created centers were explained

  • Newly synthesized octahydrochromanes were tested against both cannabinoid receptors

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Prof. Parcher for the editing, proofreading and valuable suggestions for improving the quality of the manuscript. We are also thankful to Dr. Mei Wang for mass spectroscopy and Ms. Janet A. Lambert for biological screening against cannabinoid receptors. This study was supported in part by United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Specific Cooperative Agreement 58-6060-6-015. The cannabinoid receptors activity was made possible by Grant Number P20GM104932 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Footnotes

Supporting information: Experimental details, analytical data for all compounds, NMR spectra for (-)-3a - (-)-3c, (+)-5a, (-)-7c, (-)-9c and (-)-11c, along with NCI-60 cell line data for select compounds are available.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References and notes

  • 1.Yrjola S, Sarparanta M, Airaksinen AJ, Hytti M, Kauppinen A, Pasonen-Seppanen S, Adinolfi B, Nieri P, Manera C, Keinanen O, Poso A, Nevalainen TJ, Parkkari T. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2015;67:85. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2014.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Preet A, Qamri Z, Nasser MW, Prasad A, Shilo K, Zou X, Groopman JE, Ganju RK. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2011;4:65. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Morales P, Blasco-Benito S, Andradas C, Gomez-Canas M, Flores JM, Goya P, Fernandez-Ruiz J, Sanchez C, Jagerovic N. J Med Chem. 2015;58:2256. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Veeraraghavan P, Dekanic A, Nistri A. Neuroscience. 2016;333:214. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Abalo R, Chen C, Vera G, Fichna J, Thakur GA, Lopez-Perez AE, Makriyannis A, Martin-Fontelles MI, Storr M. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27:1721. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Patil KR, Goyal SN, Sharma C, Patil CR, Ojha S. Curr Med Chem. 2015;22:3472. doi: 10.2174/0929867322666150716115057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Leo A, Russo E, Elia M. Pharmacol Res. 2016;107:85. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jones NA, Hill AJ, Smith I, Bevan SA, Williams CM, Whalley BJ, Stephens GJ. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2010;332:569. doi: 10.1124/jpet.109.159145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Thapa D, Lee JS, Heo SW, Lee YR, Kang KW, Kwak MK, Choi HG, Kim JA. Eur J Pharmacol. 2011;650:64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.09.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nazimova E, Pavlova A, Mikhalchenko O, Il'ina I, Korchagina D, Tolstikova Ty, Volcho K, Salakhutdinov N. Med Chem Res. 2016;25:1369. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rickards RW, Roenneberg H. J Org Chem. 1984;49:572. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chittiboyina AG, Reddy CR, Watkins EB, Avery MA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004;45:1689. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yadav JS, Reddy BVS, Ganesh AV, Narayana Kumar GGKS. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010;51:2963. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Baishya G, Sarmah B, Hazarika N. Synlett. 2013;24:1137. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Stekrova M, Maki-Arvela P, Leino E, Valkaj KM, Eranen K, Aho A, Smeds A, Kumar N, Volcho KP, Salakhutdinov NF, Murzin DY. Catal Today. 2017;279:56. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Timofeeva MN, Panchenko VN, Gil A, Zakusin SV, Krupskaya VV, Volcho KP, Vicente MA. Catal Commun. 2015;69:234. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chakraborti AK, Ray JK, Kundu KK, Chakrabarty S, Mukherjee D, Ghatak UR. J Chem Soc, Perkin Trans. 1984;1:261. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chakraborti AK, Saha B, Ray C, Ghatak UR. Tetrahedron. 1987;43:4433. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.The crystal data of compound 4 (CCDC 1438965) is available online at www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif
  • 20.Friedrich D, Bohlmann F. Tetrahedron. 1988;44:1369. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dhankher P, Sheppard TD. Synlett. 2014;25:381. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kumarihamy M, Leon F, Pettaway S, Wilson L, Lambert JA, Wang M, Hill C, Mc Curdy CR, El Sohly MA, Cutler SJ, Muhammad I. J Ethnopharmacol. 2015;174:57. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supplement

RESOURCES