Change history
1/19/2022
Editor's Note: Concerns have been raised about the integrity of the data reported in this article. This is currently being investigated. Further editorial action may be taken as appropriate once the investigation into the concerns is complete and all parties have been given an opportunity to respond in full.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer related death worldwide; however, the molecular mechanisms regulating HCC progression remain largely unknown. In this study, we determined the role of DDX39 which a DEAD-box RNA helicase in HCC progression, and found DDX39 was upregulated in HCC tissues and cells, DDX39 expression was positive correlated with advanced clinical stage, survival analysis showed patients with high-DDX39 levels had poor outcome, it was an independent prognostic factor. Functional analysis revealed that DDX39 overexpression promoted HCC cell migration, invasion, growth, and metastasis, DDX39 knockdown inhibited HCC cell migration, invasion, growth, and metastasis. Mechanism analysis suggested DDX39 overexpression increased β-catenin expression in nucleus and increased Wnt/β-catenin pathway target genes levels, while DDX39 knockdown reduced this effect. Knockdown of Wnt/β-catenin pathway co-activators TCF4 and LEF1 in DDX39 overexpressing HCC cells inhibited Wnt/β-catenin pathway target genes. The invasion ability was also reduced, confirming DDX39 regulates HCC progression by activating Wnt/β-catenin pathway. In conclusion, we found DDX39 is a target and prognostic factor for HCC, and promotes HCC migration, invasion, growth, and metastasis by activating Wnt/β-catenin pathway.
Introduction
DDX39 is a DEAD box RNA helicase which unwind double-stranded RNA in an ATP-dependent manner, it interacts with HCC-1, U2AF65, REF2-1, TRF2, ALY, CIP29, and FUS/TLS to regulate transcription, splicing, RNA export, ribosome biogenesis, telomere protection and translation1–7, DDX39 also regulates tumor progression. DDX39 is overexpressed in lung squamous cell cancer, and promotes cancer cell proliferation8. DDX39 is an independent prognostic biomarker for gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and associated with metastasis9. It inhibits invasion of bladder cancer and is an unfavorable prognostic factor for bladder cancer10. DDX39 is a putative biomarker of breast cancer and early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma11,12. DDX39 also upregulates in malignant pleural mesothelioma cells and pancreatic cancer cells acquired gemcitabine resistance13,14. Although DDX39 has been reported to regulate the progression of many tumors, but its role in tumor development and regulatory mechanisms has not been understood well. Here we analyzed the prognostic value of DDX39 in HCC, and studied the role of DDX39 in HCC migration, invasion, metastasis, and growth, we found DDX39 was an unfavorable prognosis for HCC patients, and promoted HCC metastasis and growth. Then we studied the regulatory mechanism of DDX39, and found DDX39 promoting HCC progression though activating Wnt/β-catenin pathway.
Results
DDX39 is an independent prognostic factor for HCC patients
To investigate the role of DDX39 in HCC progression, we first analyzed DDX39 expression in HCC tissues using data downloaded from GSE14520 which contains gene expression date of HCC, and found DDX39 was significantly upregulated in HCC tissues (Supplemental Fig. 1A). GSEA analysis suggested patients with high-DDX39 expression had short survival time, patients with low-DDX39 expression had long survival time (Supplemental Fig. 1B), suggesting DDX39 might be a prognostic factor for HCC patients. Oncomine database suggested DDX39 was upregulated in many tumors, including liver cancer (Supplemental Fig. 1C). These results suggested DDX39 might promote HCC progression.
We used TCGA date further to study DDX39 expression in HCC, and found DDX39 was significantly upregulated in HCC tissues compared to normal liver (Fig. 1a). DDX39 was upregulated in HCC cells compared to the normal liver cell (Fig. 1b and Supplemental Fig. 2A). We used another four paired of HCC tissues and adjacent liver tissues to determine DDX39 expression, and found DDX39 was also upregulated in four HCC tissues compared to the adjacent normal liver tissues both in mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 1c and Supplemental Fig. 2B). We also determined DDX39 levels in normal liver tissues and HCC tissues (n = 110) using IHC, suggesting DDX39 was upregulated in HCC tissues, and patients with advanced HCC stage had higher DDX39 levels (Fig. 1d and Supplemental Fig. 2C). Survival cure analysis suggested patients with high-DDX39 levels had poor outcome, patients with low-DDX39 levels had good outcome (Fig. 1e). Multivariate analyses suggested DDX39 was an independent prognostic factor for HCC patients (Fig. 1f). These findings suggested DDX39 was upregulated in HCC cells and tissues, and was an unfavorable prognostic factor for HCC patients.
DDX39 contributes to HCC migration, invasion, and metastasis
To analyze DDX39’s role in HCC development, GSEA analysis was performed to analyze the correlation between DDX39 levels and HCC metastasis, and suggested patients with high-DDX39 levels had high-metastatic ability, patients with low-DDX39 levels had low metastatic ability, DDX39 levels were positive correlation with tumor metastasis (Fig. 2a). Thus, we determined the role of DDX39 in HCC migration, invasion, and metastasis. DDX39 was overexpression in HCC cells Huh1 and Hep3B (Fig. 2b). Wound healing assay suggested DDX39 overexpression promoted HCC cell migration (Fig. 2c). Transwell assay suggested DDX39 overexpression significantly promoted HCC cell invasion (Fig. 2d). Three-dimensional spheroid invasion assay suggested DDX39 overexpression increased invasive projections emanating from cells compared to the empty vector control group (Fig. 2e). These findings suggested DDX39 overexpression promoted HCC cell migration and invasion.
To confirm above findings, we knocked down DDX39 in the same HCC cells (Fig. 3a). 3D spheroid invasion assay suggested DDX39 knockdown reduced invasive projections emanating from cells compared to the scramble control group (Fig. 3b). Transwell assay suggested DDX39 knockdown significantly inhibited HCC cell invasion (Fig. 3c). Wound healing assay suggested DDX39 knockdown inhibited HCC cell migration (Fig. 3d). These findings suggested DDX39 knockdown suppressed HCC cell migration and invasion. Together, these findings suggested DDX39 contributed to HCC cell migration and invasion.
Orthotopic transplantation tumor model was used to determine whether DDX39 regulates distant metastasis and growth, and found DDX39 overexpression promoted HCC growth and lung metastasis, the volume of tumors with DDX39 overexpression was larger than empty vector group, DDX39 overexpression increased the number of tumor nodules in lung. DDX39 knockdown inhibited HCC growth and lung metastasis, the volume of tumors with DDX39 knockdown was smaller than the scramble control group, DDX39 knockdown reduced the number of tumor nodules in lung (Fig. 4a), suggesting DDX39 promoted HCC growth and metastasis. HE staining also showed DDX39 overexpression promoted lung metastasis of HCC, DDX39 knockdown inhibited lung metastasis of HCC (Fig. 4b). Survival cure analysis of mouse transplanted with HCC cell with DDX39 overexpression or knockdown showed DDX39 overexpression shorted the survival time of mouse, DDX39 knockdown increased the survival time of mouse (Fig. 4c). AST and ALT are important diagnostic markers for liver disease, DDX39 overexpression significantly increased AST and ALT concentrations, while DDX39 knockdown significantly decreased AST and ALT activity (Fig. 4d). Together, these findings suggested DDX39 promoted HCC growth and metastasis.
DDX39 promotes HCC development through activating Wnt pathway
To determine the regulatory mechanism of DDX39 promoting HCC development, we used GSEA analysis to predict the pathways regulated by DDX39. High-DDX39 levels were positive corrected with Wnt3A targets levels (Fig. 5a), suggesting DDX39 might regulate Wnt pathway. TOP/FOP luciferase activity assay suggested DDX39 overexpression significantly activated Wnt/β-catenin pathway, DDX39 knockdown significantly inactivated Wnt/β-catenin pathway (Fig. 5b). β-catenin (also known as CTNNB1) translocated to nucleus is the marker for Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation, western blot assay suggested DDX39 overexpression increased β-catenin levels in nucleus, DDX39 knockdown inhibited β-catenin levels in nucleus, suggesting DDX39 activated Wnt/β-catenin pathway (Fig. 5c). We also determined the expression of target genes of Wnt/β-catenin pathway, such as MYC15, CD4416, RUNX217, SNAI118, and CCDN1 (Cyclin D1)19, DDX39 overexpression significantly promoted their expression, DDX39 knockdown significantly inhibited their expression (Fig. 5d). These findings suggested DDX39 could activate Wnt/β-catenin pathway.
To confirm above results, we knocked down TCF4 and LEF1 in HCC cells with DDX39 overexpression to inactivate β-catenin pathway (Fig. 6a), TCF4 and LEF1 are the co-activators of Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Knockdown of TCF4 or LEF1 in HCC cells with DDX39 overexpression significantly inhibited MYC, CD44, RUNX2, SNAI1, and CCND1 expression (Fig. 6b). Transwell assay suggested knockdown of TCF4 or LEF1 significantly inhibited HCC cell invasion (Fig. 6c). 3D spheroid invasion assay suggested knockdown of TCF4 or LEF1 reduced invasive projections emanating from cells (Fig. 6d). TCF4 or LEF1 knockdown reversed the phenotypes caused by DDX39 overexpression, confirming DDX39 regulated HCC progression through activating Wnt/β-catenin pathway.
Discussion
In this study, we studied the role of DDX39 in HCC prognosis and progression. DDX39 was upregulated in HCC tissues and cells, high-DDX39 levels positively correlated with advanced clinical stages, high-DDX39 levels were associated with poor outcome. DDX39 overexpression promoted HCC migration, invasion, metastasis, and growth, while DDX39 knockdown reduced these effects. Mechanism analysis suggested DDX39 promoted HCC progression by activating Wnt/β-catenin pathway.
Although, DDX39 has been shown to regulate several tumors progression, but they only performed in vitro assay, and the molecular mechanism also could not be carried out. Our research analyzed the DDX39’s role in HCC progression in vitro and in vivo, and found DDX39 promoted HCC growth and lung metastasis. We also studied the molecular mechanism, and found DDX39 could activate Wnt/β-catenin pathway.
Wnt/β-catenin pathway has been well-recognized and well-studied. Wnt ligands binding to its receptor initiate the Wnt signaling, β-catenin dissociates from the destruction complex composed of Axin, adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) and GSK3β, and translocates into nucleus. Then β-catenin binds to co-activators LEF and TCF to form transcriptional complex, and regulates the Wnt target genes expression20,21. Wnt/β-catenin pathway promotes HCC growth, metastasis and the self-renewal of HCC stem cells22–26. We found DDX39 promoted β-catenin accumulate in nucleus, and the expression of Wnt signaling target genes, suggesting DDX39 activated Wnt signaling. Knockdown of Wnt/β-catenin pathway coactivator TCF4 and LEF1 in HCC cells with DDX39 overexpressing inhibited HCC progression, confirming DDX39 promoted HCC progression by activating Wnt/β-catenin pathway. We found β-catenin overexpression couldnot promote DDX39 expression (data not show), DDX39 was an upstream molecule of Wnt/β-catenin pathway, and was a good target for HCC therapy, how DDX39 activates Wnt/β-catenin still is to be explored.
In summary, DDX39 promoted HCC growth and metastasis by activating Wnt/β-catenin pathway, and was a potential target for HCC therapy.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
Immortalized normal liver cancer LO2 and HCC cells Huh7, SNU-475, SNU-387, Huh1, SK-Hep1, HepG2, and HepB3 were cultured using DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone). Cells were maintained in a humidified atmosphere at 37 °C with 5% CO2.
Clinical samples, histology, and immunohistochemistry (IHC)
A cohort of 110 paraffin-embedded specimens was collected during surgical procedures from patients with HCC according to a protocol approved by the institutional review board of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Frozen HCC specimens, along with matched normal tissues were available form four patients. All patients provided written, informed consent for participation in the study and provision of tumor samples. IHC assay were carried out as described27,28. The antibody used was DDX39 (ab96621, Abcam). Immunohistochemical staining of slides was reviewed and scored by two pathologists independent. The staining index (SI) was calculated as the product of the staining intensity and the proportion of positive cell scores. For histology of mice lung, tissues were collected and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde overnight and embedded in paraffin, then sectioned at 5 μm. Finally, haematoxylin and eosin stained. The images were captured using the AxioVision Rel.4.6 computerized image analysis system (Carl Zeiss Co Ltd, Jena, Germany).
qRT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Life Technologies), and reversely transcribed into cDNA using PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit (TaKaRa), Oligo dT18 was used as the primer. Relative gene expression levels were examined using SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ II (Tli RNaseH Plus) (TaKaRa) on a CFX96 Touch Real-time PCR Detection system (Bio-Rad). GAPDH was used as the internal control.
Protein isolation and western blot
Total proteins were extracted using RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 1 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate) supplemental with protease inhibitors (Roche). Western blot assay was performed as previously described28 with antibodies against DDX39 (ab96621, Abcam), TCF4 (#2596, Cell Signaling Technology), LEF1 (#2230, Cell Signaling Technology) and GAPDH (G8795, Sigma). For nuclear proteins extraction, KeyGEN Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Protein Extraction Kit (KGP150, KeyGEN BioTECH) was used, the antibodies against β-catenin (#8480, Cell Signaling Technology) and EF-1α (#2551, Cell Signaling Technology) were used.
Vectors and infection
Full-length human DDX39 cDNA was subcloned into the pMSCV-pur retroviral vector (Clontech) to generate pMSCV-DDX39 vector (indicated as DDX39), the empty vector was used as the negative control (indicated as Vector). Two short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) oligonucleotides sequences against DDX39 was cloned into the pSuper-retro-pur retroviral vector (OligoEngine) to generate pSuper-DDX39 shRNAs (indicated as shDDX39#1 and shDDX39#2, respectively), The sequences of shRNAs were: shDDX39#1, 5′-GCGAGTCAACATCGTCTTTA-3′ and shDDX39#2, 5′-CCAGGTGATAATCTTCGTCAA-3′. the scramble shRNA sequence was cloned pSuper-pur vector and used as the negative control (indicated as Scramble). pMSCV-DDX39 vector, pMSCV empty vector, pSuper-DDX39 shRNA1, pSuper-DDX39 shRNA2 or pSuper-pur vector were co-transfected with pCL into 293T using Lipofectamine 3000 (Life Technologies). The retroviral supernatants were collected 48 h after transfection and filtered through a 0.45 μm filter. Supernatants plus polybrene (Sigma) were infected with growing HCC cells, after 6 h, the supernatants were replaced by fresh medium. Puromycin (Sigma) was sued to screen stably cell lines. The small interferences RNAs (siRNAs) of TCF4 and LEF and the negative control were purchased from Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd. siRNAs were transfected into HCC cells using Lipofectamine 3000.
Luciferase reporter assay
The reporter plasmids containing wild-type (CCTTTGATC; TOPflash, plasmid 16558) or mutated (CCTTTGGCC; FOPflash, plasmid 16559) TCF/LEF DNA binding sites were purchased form Addgene, and co-transfected with pRL-TK Renilla plasmid into HCC cells using Lipofectamine 3000 (Life Technologies), respectively. Forty-eight hours after transfection, luciferase activity was analyzed using the Dual-Glo Luciferase Assay Kit (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Experiments were performed in triplicates.
Cell migration and invasion assay
Tumor cell migration and invasion were determined using wound healing, transwell assay and 3D spheroid invasion assay performed as described29. For 3D spheroid invasion assay, cells were seeded on 2% Materigel (BD) coated in 24-well plates, and medium was changed every other day. Cells which have formed a 3D spherical structure were photographed for 10 days.
Animal study
All animal experiments were performed under the protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Four- to 6-week-old nu/nu athymic BALB/cA mice were purchased from the Experimental Animal Center of the Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine. A total of 5×106 Hep3B with DDX39 overexpression or knockdown were orthotopically injected into the liver parenchyma of mice to observe for lung metastasis (n = 6), the mice were fed for 40 days, then were killed, tumors were excised. The activity of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in blood were examined.
Statistical analysis
SPSS 19.0 was used to perform all statistical analyses. All data from at least three independent experiments are presented as the mean ± s.d. Comparisons between different groups were analyzed using Student’s t-test, survival curves were derived from Kaplan–Meier estimates, multivariate Cox-regression analysis was used to determine the prognostic value of DDX39 levels and other clinicopathologic characteristic. GSEA was performed using http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/index.jsp30. p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2014A030313090 and No. 2014A030313190), Science and Technology Projects Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2015A070710006 and No. 2016A020215053), Science and Technology Projects Foundation of Guangzhou City (No. 201507020037 and No. 201607010260) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81602701).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Edited by G.M. Fimia
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Tong Zhang, Zhenjiang Ma, Lijuan Liu
Contributor Information
Tong Zhang, Email: zhjeff72@sina.com.
Heping Li, Email: drliheping@163.com.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at (10.1038/s41419-018-0591-0).
References
- 1.Sugiura T, Sakurai K, Nagano Y. Intracellular characterization of DDX39, a novel growth-associated RNA helicase. Exp. Cell Res. 2007;313:782–790. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gaouar O, Germain H. mRNA export: threading the needle. Front. Plant Sci. 2013;4:59. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gromadzka AM, Steckelberg AL, Singh KK, Hofmann K, Gehring NH. A short conserved motif in ALYREF directs cap- and EJC-dependent assembly of export complexes on spliced mRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:2348–2361. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Leaw CL, Ren EC, Choong ML. Hcc-1 is a novel component of the nuclear matrix with growth inhibitory function. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2004;61:2264–2273. doi: 10.1007/s00018-004-4205-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Prigge JR, Iverson SV, Siders AM, Schmidt EE. Interactome for auxiliary splicing factor U2AF(65) suggests diverse roles. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2009;1789:487–492. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2009.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Golovanov AP, Hautbergue GM, Tintaru AM, Lian LY, Wilson SA. The solution structure of REF2-I reveals interdomain interactions and regions involved in binding mRNA export factors and RNA. RNA. 2006;12:1933–1948. doi: 10.1261/rna.212106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yoo HH, Chung IK. Requirement of DDX39 DEAD box RNA helicase for genome integrity and telomere protection. Aging Cell. 2011;10:557–571. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2011.00696.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sugiura T, Nagano Y, Noguchi Y. DDX39, upregulated in lung squamous cell cancer, displays RNA helicase activities and promotes cancer cell growth. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2007;6:957–964. doi: 10.4161/cbt.6.6.4192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kikuta K, et al. Clinical proteomics identified ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX39 as a novel biomarker to predict poor prognosis of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. J. Proteome. 2012;75:1089–1098. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kato M, et al. DDX39 acts as a suppressor of invasion for bladder cancer. Cancer Sci. 2012;103:1363–1369. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02298.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Calderon-Gonzalez KG, et al. Determination of the protein expression profiles of breast cancer cell lines by quantitative proteomics using iTRAQ labelling and tandem mass spectrometry. J. Proteome. 2015;124:50–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Naboulsi W, et al. Quantitative tissue proteomics analysis reveals versican as potential biomarker for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Proteome Res. 2016;15:38–47. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kuramitsu Y, et al. Up-regulation of DDX39 in human malignant pleural mesothelioma cell lines compared to normal pleural mesothelial cells. Anticancer Res. 2013;33:2557–2560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kuramitsu Y, et al. Up-regulation of DDX39 in human pancreatic cancer cells with acquired gemcitabine resistance compared to gemcitabine-sensitive parental cells. Anticancer Res. 2013;33:3133–3136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhao Z, Li S, Song E, Liu S. The roles of ncRNAs and histone-modifiers in regulating breast cancer stem cells. Protein Cell. 2016;7:89–99. doi: 10.1007/s13238-015-0199-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Orian-Rousseau V. CD44 acts as a signaling platform controlling tumor progression and metastasis. Front. Immunol. 2015;6:154. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pratap J, et al. Regulatory roles of Runx2 in metastatic tumor and cancer cell interactions with bone. Cancer Metastas-. Rev. 2006;25:589–600. doi: 10.1007/s10555-006-9032-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Katoh M. Network of WNT and other regulatory signaling cascades in pluripotent stem cells and cancer stem cells. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2011;12:160–170. doi: 10.2174/138920111794295710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Takahashi-Yanaga F, Sasaguri T. GSK-3beta regulates cyclin D1 expression: a new target for chemotherapy. Cell Signal. 2008;20:581–589. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2007.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fodde R, Brabletz T. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in cancer stemness and malignant behavior. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2007;19:150–158. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2007.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Clevers H, Nusse R. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and disease. Cell. 2012;149:1192–1205. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ye Y, et al. NTS/NTR1 co-expression enhances epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and promotes tumor metastasis by activating the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7:70303–70322. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chai, S. et al. Oct4/miR-1246 signaling axis drives Wnt/beta-catenin activation in liver cancer stem cells. Hepatology64, 2062–2076 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 24.Mokkapati S, et al. Beta-catenin activation in a novel liver progenitor cell type is sufficient to cause hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatoblastoma. Cancer Res. 2014;74:4515–4525. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Leung WK, He M, Chan AW, Law PT, Wong N. Wnt/beta-catenin activates MiR-183/96/182 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma that promotes cell invasion. Cancer Lett. 2015;362:97–105. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wang R, et al. Notch and Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway play important roles in activating liver cancer stem cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7:5754–5768. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Watanabe T, et al. Higher-order chromatin regulation and differential gene expression in the human tumor necrosis factor/lymphotoxin locus in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012;32:1529–1541. doi: 10.1128/MCB.06478-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nguyen LH, et al. Lin28b is sufficient to drive liver cancer and necessary for its maintenance in murine models. Cancer Cell. 2014;26:248–261. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.06.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cai J, et al. MicroRNA-374a activates Wnt/beta-catenin signaling to promote breast cancer metastasis. J. Clin. Investig. 2013;123:566–579. doi: 10.1172/JCI66666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Subramanian A, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:15545–15550. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.