Abstract
The pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) includes signaling defects mediated by the transforming growth factor β─bone morphogenetic protein─growth and differentiation factor (TGFβ-BMP-GDF) family of proteins. In animal models of AD, administration of BMP9/GDF2 improves memory and reduces amyloidosis. The best characterized type I receptor of BMP9 is ALK1. We characterized ALK1 expression in the hippocampus using immunohistochemistry. In the rat, ALK1 immunoreactivity was found in CA pyramidal neurons, most frequently and robustly in the CA2 and CA3 fields. In addition, there were sporadic ALK1-immunoreactive cells in the stratum oriens, mainly in CA1. The ALK1 expression pattern in human hippocampus was similar to that of rat. Pyramidal neurons within the CA2, CA3, and CA4 were strongly ALK1-immunoractive in hippocampi of cognitively intact subjects with no neurofibrillary tangles. ALK1 signal was found in the axons of alveus and fimbria, and in the neuropil across CA fields. Relatively strongest ALK1 neuropil signal was observed in CA1 where pyramidal neurons were occasionally ALK1-immunoractive. As in the rat, horizontally oriented neurons in the stratum oriens of CA1 were both ALK1- and GAD67-immunoreactive. Analysis of ALK1 immunoreactivity across stages of AD pathology revealed that disease progression was characterized by overall reduction of the ALK1 signal in CA3 in advanced, but not early, stages of AD. These data suggest that the CA3 pyramidal neurons may remain responsive to the ALK1 ligands, e.g., BMP9, during initial stages of AD and that ALK1 may constitute a therapeutic target in early and moderate AD.
Keywords: ACVRL1, ALK1, CA1, CA3, GAD67, hippocampus, immunohistochemistry
INTRODUCTION
The elucidation of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and the search for therapeutic targets for this illness has been approached by both unbiased experimental designs and hypothesis-driven studies. Recent investigations by Jaeger et al. [1] employing the former strategy of combining plasma proteomics [1], meta analysis of genome-wide association studies [2], and brain mRNA expression profiling [3] point to defects in the transforming growth factor β─bone morphogenetic protein─growth and differentiation factor (TGFβ-BMP-GDF) signaling pathways in AD. These abnormalities include altered expression of TGFβ-family proteins (e.g., GDF1, GDF3, myostatin), their receptors (e.g., ACVR1B, ACVR2B, ACVR1C), and co-receptors (e.g., cripto), as well as intracellular signal protein mediators, SMADs. In addition, there is evidence for increased BMP6 expression in the hippocampus of AD patients [4]. Our studies have utilized the hypothesis-based approach focusing on testing the idea that abnormalities in signaling by a member of the TGFβ-BMP-GDF family protein, BMP9/GDF2, are a feature of AD pathology because of its actions on basal forebrain cholinergic neurons (BFCN). These neurons innervate the hippocampus and cerebral cortex and belong to critical neuronal systems that underlie learning, memory and attention [5, 6]. A decline in BFCN function and diminished cholinergic marker expression is apparent in aged humans and animals [7–9], in AD patients [10, 11] and in animal models of AD [10, 12–17]. Thus, it has been postulated that dysfunction and/or degeneration of BFCN contributes to the memory deficits seen in advanced age and in AD [8, 10, 11]. We [18, 19] and others [20] have obtained evidence that BMP9 is a key differentiating factor for BFCN during development and, when infused intracerebroventricularly in mice with experimental injury to these neurons, prevents BFCN loss [21]. Moreover, we subsequently showed that BMP9 infusion reverses the downregulation of BFCN markers in a transgenic mouse model of AD, ameliorates hippocampal amyloidosis, and increases the expression of several growth factors (NGF, NT3, and IGF1) [22]. These results were confirmed and extended by others who found that intranasal BMP9 administration in the same mouse model of AD improved learning and memory, reduced hippocampal amyloidosis and tau hyperphosphorylation, and suppressed brain inflammation [23]. BMP9 and a related protein, BMP10, signal by binding to- and activating a heterodimeric type II and type I receptor complex and their signaling specificity is conferred by ACVRL1/ALK1 type I receptor [24–28]. ALK1 is broadly expressed in the endothelium [29, 30] where its activity is central for normal vascular development and remodeling [31]. Mutations in the ACVRL1 gene (reviewed in [32]), which encodes ALK1, cause hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia type II [OMIM #600376]─a disease characterized by arteriovenous malformations [31]. In addition to its expression in blood vessels, we found Alk1 mRNA in fetal mouse BFCN [33] and König et al described ALK1 mRNA and protein in cultured rat neonatal hippocampal neurons and showed the upregulation of neuronal ALK1 expression upon excitotoxic and ischemic injury, possibly via a neuroprotective mechanism [34]. Thus, studies in animals indicate that hippocampal neurons express the specific BMP9 receptor, ALK1, and that BMP9 administration ameliorates AD-like pathology in the hippocampus of mouse models of AD. Here we report that ALK1 protein signal pattern in normal human and rat hippocampus is similar and that expression in human CA3 neurons is reduced in advanced, but not early, stages of AD.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Rat brain
Young adult 2.5-month-old Wistar rats (strain 003, Charles River Laboratories International, MA) were anesthetized with 10 mg/kg xylazine and 80 mg/kg ketamine hydrochloride given intraperitoneally and subsequently perfused transcardially with 0.1M phosphate buffer (PB) followed by 4% paraformaldehyde with 0.01% glutaraldehyde in 0.1M PB (EM fixative), pH 7.4. All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Boston University.
Human postmortem hippocampi
Human formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks of hippocampi of twenty-two subjects were acquired through the Framingham Heart Study Brain Donation Program, Framingham, MA, the Netherlands Brain Bank, Amsterdam, Netherlands, and Boston Medical Center as described in Table 1. Boston University Medical Center’s Institutional Review Board approved this study and the authors state adherence to these standards. The analyzed subjects were stratified into three groups based on Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score [35–37] and Braak and Braak (BB) stage [38]. The CDR was assigned based on antemortem assessment months prior to death and a postmortem retrospective CDR based on a family interview with one or more family members [39]. Group 1 consisted of true control individuals defined as cognitively healthy subjects without any presence of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) in the CA fields (CDR0, BB0; n = 7, age mean 66.0 ± 5.4 (SD) years, 2 female (F)/5 male (M)); Group 2 included subjects either cognitively intact or with minimal cognitive dysfunction (CDR0-0.5) in the limbic BB stages (CDR0-0.5, BBI-III; n = 8, age mean 91.6 ± 6.2 years, 6F/2M); and Group 3 consisted of subjects with definite AD by NINCDS-ADRDA criteria and in the isocortical BB stages (CDR1-3, BBIV-VI; n = 7, age mean 86.7 ± 6.2 years, 2F/5 M) (Table 1). Group 1 subjects (true controls without any evidence of NFTs in the hippocampus) are inherently younger than Group 2 and 3 subjects, as NFTs increase with age even in cognitively intact subjects. No Lewy body pathology was reported in any of the subjects. All subjects were de-identified and authors were blinded to subjects’ CDR score and BB stage during data acquisition. Quantitative analysis of ALK1 immunoreactivity within the CA3 subregion, distinctly identifiable at the level of the lateral geniculate nucleus, was conducted on the twenty-two subjects (Table 1).
Table 1.
Analyzed subjects organized according to Braak and Braak (BB) stage, hippocampal plaque score (CERAD), cognitive status Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score, age, gender, and postmortem interval (PMI).
| Subjects in Groups 1-3 | BB stage | Hippocampal plaques (CERAD) | Cognitive status/CDR score | Age (y) | Gender | PMI (h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 (CDR 0, BB 0) | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| NBB 2012 052 | 0 | 0 | No evidence of dementia | 64 | F | 5.7 |
| NBB 2010 115 | 0 | 0 | No evidence of dementia | 70 | M | 3.6 |
| NBB 2011 091 | 0 | 1+ (D) | No evidence of dementia | 76 | M | 6.8 |
| BM 23 | 0 | 0 | No evidence of dementia | 66 | F | 24 |
| BM 29 | 0 | 0 | No evidence of dementia | 61 | M | 24 |
| BVAX 85 | 0 | 0 | No evidence of dementia | 61 | M | 7.5 |
| BM 33 | 0 | 0 | No evidence of dementia | 64 | M | 27 |
|
| ||||||
| Group 2 (CDR 0-0.5, BB I-III) | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| BVAX 255 | I | 0 | 0 | 92 | F | 16 |
| NBB 2012 059 | II | 1+ (D) | 0 | 98 | F | 4.6 |
| NBB 2013 011 | III | 2+ (D) | 0 | 92 | F | 4.4 |
| NBB 2012 001 | II | 3+ (D) | 0.5 | 79 | M | 5.7 |
| BVAX 219 | II | 0 | 0.5 | 97 | F | 6 |
| BVAX 226 | II | 0 | 0.5 | 97 | F | unknown |
| BVAX 147 | III | 1+ (D), 1+ (N) | 0.5 | 89 | M | unknown |
| NBB 2013 010 | III | 0 | 0.5 | 89 | F | 6.6 |
|
| ||||||
| Group 3 (CDR 1-3, BB IV-VI) | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| NBB 2013 009 | IV | 1+ (D), 3+ (N) | 1 | 92 | F | 7.4 |
| NBB 2008 075 | IV | 3+ (D), 1+ (N) | Overt dementia; CDR not available | 88 | M | 5.0 |
| BVAX 100 | IV | 1+ (D), 2+ (N) | 1 | 89 | M | 3.0 |
| BVAX 205 | IV | 2+ (N) | 1 | 96 | F | 3.5 |
| BVAX 250 | VI | 0 | 3 | 82 | M | 6.5 |
| BVAX 368 | VI | 2+ (D), 2+ (N) | 3 | 80 | M | 6.5 |
| BVAX 216 | VI | 2+ (D), 3+ (N) | 3 | 80 | M | Unknown |
0 = none; 1+ = sparse; 2+ = moderate; 3+ = frequent. BB, Braak & Braak; CERAD, The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease; D, diffuse plaques; N, neuritic plaques; NBB, Netherlands Brain Bank; BM, Boston Medical Center; BVAX, Brain Bank of the Boston University Alzheimer
We performed tau immunohistochemistry (IHC) on all obtained hippocampi to corroborate reported BB stages in the accompanying neuropathological reports. No neuritic plaques were present in cognitively intact subjects of Group 1 (CDR0, BB0; Table 1) while amyloid-β pathology was reported in nearly all Group 3 subjects - patients diagnosed with AD clinically and neuropathologicaly (CDR1-3, BBIV-VI; Table 1). Group 2 included subjects with only hippocampal/limbic NFTs (BBI-III) and heterogeneous in terms of both amyloid-β pathology and cognitive status (CDR0-0.5; Table 1). Neuropathology reports for three subjects (one cognitively intact individual, CDR0, and two with minimal cognitive deficits, CDR 0.5; Group 2, Table 1) reported absence of any amyloid-β pathology. It is possible that some or all of these three individuals (ages 89-97) could nowadays meet criteria for Primary Age-Related Tauopathy (PART) [40] and not develop AD.
Immunohistochemistry
FFPE blocks were sectioned at 5 μm thickness, dried at room temperature for 24 h, and heated at 80°C for 24 h before IHC processing. Deparaffinization, antigen retrieval, and subsequent staining was performed with Ventana Benchmark Ultra automated IHC instrument using Ventana Medical System reagents including ultraView Universal DAB (Cat#760-500), Hematoxylin II (Cat#790-2208), and Bluing Reagent (Cat#760-2037) (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Roche Diagnostics Ltd., Tucson, AZ) at the Boston Medical Center Pathology Department.
Examined protein expression of ALK1 was analyzed using the following paradigm: three independent IHC experiments of each subject were processed collectively. Therefore, experiments performed yielded three independently stained step-wise sections separated by at least 10 μm per subject for analysis. Automated IHC with the Ventana Benchmark Ultra allowed for maximally replicative conditions in IHC experiments, eliminating variability in reagent composition, quantity, incubation time, and human error, minimizing variability between experiments. Internal control sections from established subjects were stained collectively with any newly added subjects to ensure reproducibility of staining for the protein of interest. Quantitative analysis of ALK1 was generated from the imaged triplicate sections. Data from triplicate sections was averaged to obtain representative values for each subject.
Western blot
C57BL6 wild type mouse hippocampal protein lysates, 40 μg per sample, were subjected to PAGE electrophoresis using 4-12% Bis-Tris Midi Gel (Invitrogen) and transferred to a blotting membrane with the iBlot system (Invitrogen). The membrane was blocked with 5% milk in TBS/1.5% Tween (TBS-T), washed with TBS-T, and probed overnight with rabbit anti-ALK1 antibody (1:1000, Atlas Antibodies, Stockholm, Sweden #HPA007041). Following incubation with the primary antibody, the blot was incubated in anti-Rabbit-HRP (1:4000, Bio-Rad). Reactive bands were detected with SuperSignal West Femto chemiluminescent substrate (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Chemiluminescence was captured with a Kodak ImageStation 440CF.
Antibodies
Primary antibodies included rabbit polyclonal anti-ALK1 (1:25, HPA007041, Atlas Antibodies). This anti-ALK1 antibody immunohistochemical specificity in FFPE tissues was characterized by immunoabsorption assay with the ALK1 immunogen (APrEST71390, Atlas Antibodies) incubated at 5X molar excess of the ALK1 antibody at room temperature for 1 h before applying primary and immunogen or primary alone to control tissue in the identical IHC protocol used for ALK1 analysis (Supplementary Fig. 1A-D). Specificity of this antibody was further shown in western blot analysis of mouse hippocampus, revealing a single band at 70 kDa, corresponding to ALK1 signal (Supplementary Fig. 1E). Mouse anti-GAD67 monoclonal antibody (1:125, GR419, Sigma, Dallas, TX), mouse anti-human amyloid-β (Aβ) [6F/3D] monoclonal antibody (1:25, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) rabbit anti-human tau [A0024] polyclonal antibody (1:3200, Dako), and mouse anti-human phospho-PHF-tau [AT8] monoclonal antibody (1:2000, Pierce) were also used for confirmation of neuropathological report data and qualitative analyses.
Quantitative image analysis
Slides were imaged using an Olympus BX60 light microscope, QImaging Retiga 2000R camera, and QCapture Suite and Suite-PLUS software. All images used in quantitation were analyzed with ImageJ, version 1.48, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD [41, 42]. ImageJ Stitching plugin was used to compose high resolution, low magnification images [43].
Three 40× field images, encompassing the anatomically distinct CA3 field (Supplementary Fig. 2), were used in quantitative ALK1 signal analysis of de-identified hippocampal sections to examine the CA3 subregion (n=22, see Table 1). RGB images were converted to 8-bit grayscale with intensity values ranging from 0 to 255, and the threshold value for ALK1 IHC signal in CA3, including ALK1-immunoreactivity in the pyramidal neurons and in the neuropil, was determined empirically for each case, within the range of threshold values from 100 to 175 on the 255 scale as described [44, 45]. The above-threshold ALK1 signal was subsequently calculated as a percent area without size exclusion using ImageJ v1.48 software (Supplementary Fig. 2). Mean data values from the 40× field images in triplicate experiments comprised representative values for each human subject.
Semi-quantitative analyses
In CA1 and CA4 analyses, de-identified slides were viewed at 20× magnification for semi-quantitative analysis of CA1 horizontally oriented neurons at the alveus border, consistent with the location of GABAergic neurons (see Fig. 3), and of CA1 neuropil signal in triplicate IHC experiments. Similarly, ALK1-immunoreactivity in CA4 neuropil and pyramidal neurons was scored semi-quantitatively in each triplicate IHC experiment. All CA1 and CA4 analyses used a scale of 0-3; 0 indicating no immunoreactivity, and 3 representing the strongest immunoreactivity. Semi-quantitative scoring was evaluated by 2 independent, blinded observers. All data values were averaged to find the mean score of ALK1 signal in each CA subregion for each subject.
Fig. 3.

GAD67-immunoreactive interneurons in human CA1 are ALK1-immunoreactive. In adjacent sections of healthy (CDR0, BB0) CA1 region, GAD67-immunoreactive horizontally oriented interneurons (A, arrows) are also ALK1-ir (B, arrows). Among pyramidal neurons (GAD67 non-ir), few are weakly ALK1-ir (solid arrowheads A, B). ALK1-immunoreactivity is found in fibers within alveus (B, striped arrowheads) which are not GAD67-ir (A, striped arrowheads). * Indicates landmark vessels; # indicates alveus adjacent to the lateral ventricle. Scale bars = 50 μm.
Statistical analyses
Quantitative log-transformed data among subject groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Fisher’s Least Significant Difference comparison test in CA3 field analysis of 22 subjects. This examined the percent area of ALK1-immunoreactivity in CA3 compared across subject groups, testing the null hypothesis that no significant difference should be observed across groups (alpha = 0.05). Similar statistical analysis was conducted on semi-quantitative data. Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism, version 5.0b, GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, and with JMP®, Version 11.2.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1989-2013.
RESULTS
ALK1 protein expression in the hippocampus
Initial characterization of ALK1 immunoreactivity in the rat brain (Fig. 1) revealed prominent staining in cells of the hippocampal pyramidal layer of the CA2 and CA3 fields, while CA1 cells were infrequently stained. Moreover, multiple strongly stained cells were present in the subgranular zone and granule cell layer of the dentate gyrus. In addition, there were sporadic ALK1-immunoreactive (ALK1-ir) cells in the stratum oriens, mostly in CA1.
Fig. 1.

ALK1 protein expression in the rat hippocampus. ALK1 immunohistochemistry in a 2.5-month-old rat. Prominent staining in the pyramidal neurons in CA2 and CA3, subgranular zone of the dentate gyrus (arrows) and scattered cells in the CA1 stratum oriens (arrowheads). Scale bar = 500 μm.
The ALK1 signal distribution pattern in human CA and dentate gyrus neurons was similar to that of rat. Human hippocampal projection fibers of alveus and fimbria harbored ALK1-immunreactive axons (Fig. 2A). As in rat, multiple neurons within the CA2, CA3 (Fig. 2B), and CA4 pyramidal layer were ALK1-ir. Dentate granule layer neurons were lightly positive for ALK1, though, as in the rat, a few neurons in subgranule zone yielded strong ALK1 signal. Human CA1 neuropil yielded strong ALK1 signal, unlike rat CA1 (see Fig. 1). Consistent with the rat, only rare human CA1 pyramidal somata were highlighted by ALK1 antibody giving rise to a punctate signal (Fig. 2C). Finally in both human and rat, horizontally oriented neurons at the stratum oriens of CA1 were strongly ALK1-immunoreactive (Fig. 3). The location and morphology of these cells is consistent with the GABAergic phenotype. Therefore, we analyzed adjacent hippocampal sections using antibodies against ALK1 and glutamic acid decarboxylase 1 (GAD67), the enzyme that synthesizes GABA. Indeed, these cells were immunoreactive to both antibodies indicating that the horizontal GABAergic neurons in the stratum oriens of the human hippocampus express ALK1 (Fig. 3). A blinded, semi-quantitiative analysis of the intensity of ALK1 signal of the horizontally oriented neurons at the stratum oriens revealed no significant differences between our subject groups. Similarly, in a preliminary analysis the intensity of ALK1 signal in the CA1 neuropil also did not differ among subject groups (data not shown).
Fig. 2.

ALK1 protein expression in the healthy human hippocampus. A) Robust ALK1 signal is found in the CA pyramidal layer and in the axons of alveus and fimbria. B) CA3 pyramidal cells show stronger cytoplasmic ALK1 signal in comparison to the neuronal somata of CA1 (C). Overall, the quality of ALK1 cytoplasmic signal in pyramidal neurons is granular (C, asterisk). In comparison, ALK1 neuropil signal in CA1 appears more prominent than in CA3. Scale bar A = 1500 μm.
ALK1 protein expression in CA3 decreases during progression of AD
We analyzed the ALK1 immunoreactivity patterns in the human hippocampus quantitatively in 22 subjects (Table 1), across stages of AD-associated pathological changes with advancing disease based on dementia ratings and AD-associated pathological changes (Table 1). The CA3 subregion was chosen for quantitative analysis due to the dense cholinergic innervation to CA3 from the basal forebrain neurons, which respond positively to treatment with neurotrophic factor and ALK1 ligand BMP9 in mice with experimental fimbria fornix injury [21]. In quantitative analysis we found that AD progression was associated with overall reduction of the ALK1 signal in CA3 (one-way ANOVA, F2/19=3.47, p=0.05). AD patients (Group 3; CDR1-3; BBIV-VI) showed over 30% decrease in ALK1 signal in CA3 as compared to controls (p=0.05; Fisher’s LSD test) and subjects with early AD-associated pathological changes (CDR0-0.5; BBI-III) (p=0.02; Fisher’s LSD test) (Fig. 4). The ALK1 immunoreactivity in CA3 in the latter subjects did not differ from that of controls. Semi-quantitative analysis of the ALK1 signal in CA4 neurons and neuropil found no significant change among subject groups (data not shown).
Fig. 4.

ALK1 immunoreactivity in CA3 declines in advanced AD. A) Robust ALK1-immunoreactivity in CA3 pyramidal neurons (arrows) and surrounding neuropil of a control subject (CDR0 BB0). B) Weak ALK1 signal in CA3 pyramidal neurons (arrows), and almost absent ALK1-immunoreactivity in surrounding neuropil of an AD subject (CDR1 BBIV). C) ALK1-immunoreactivity in the pyramidal neurons and in the neuropil, was determined empirically and the percent area of above-threshold ALK1 signal was determined using ImageJ software (see Methods). The original data ± SEM are plotted on the graph. The data were log-transformed and analyzed by one-way ANOVA. There was a statistically significant decrease in ALK1 signal in advanced AD patients (CDR1-3; BBIV-VI) compared to control subjects (CDR0; BB0) (*p=0.05, Fisher’s LSD) and to subjects with early AD-associated pathological changes (CDR0-0.5; BBI-III) (**p=0.02, Fisher’s LSD). Scale bars = 20 μm. Blue squares represent the examples shown in A and B.
DISCUSSION
In this study we discovered the presence of ALK1 in populations of rat and human hippocampal neurons, consistent with the report by König et al [34] who found ALK1 mRNA and protein in cultured hippocampal rat neurons. We extend their findings by demonstrating similarities of ALK1 protein expression is adult rat and human hippocampus.
Using postmortem human brain samples from control subjects and from individuals with various stages of AD we documented a decrease in ALK1 protein signal in CA3 in patients with AD-associated dementia and histologically advanced disease (CDR1-3; BBIV-VI). CA3 participates in short-term spatial memory, associative memory recall, and pattern completion processes [46–48]. CA3 receives septal GABA-ergic afferents [49] synapsing on GABAergic interneurons in the hippocampal subfields (CA1, CA3, and DG) [50]. This process of disinhibition from the septohippocampal GABAergic afferents modulates memory processing by promoting CA pyramidal neurons to fire. Further, Schaffer collaterals from CA3 pyramidal cells project onto CA1 pyramidal neurons which stimulate horizontal interneurons near the stratum oriens-alveus border. These horizontal interneurons, shown here to be ALK1- and GAD67-immunoreactive, provide feedback inhibition to the CA1 pyramidal cells [51]. The ALK1-ir GABA-ergic interneurons would be expected to respond to the ALK1 agonists, BMP9 or BMP10, and may benefit from the documented BMP signaling support for GABAergic neuron differentiation and survival [52, 53]. Consistently, studies of postmortem human brain have revealed a dramatic downregulation of GAD67 expression concomitant with abnormalities in the expression of TGFβ/BMP signaling molecules in this neuronal population in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder [54], suggesting that defects in the TGFβ/BMP signaling pathways may underlie the underappreciated neurodegeneration in these diseases.
In contrast to a dramatic neuronal loss and neurofibrillary tangle accumulation seen in CA1 in AD [38, 55–60], the CA3 neurons are relatively spared (e.g., [55, 60–62]) and there are few examples of AD-selective abnormalities in this neuronal population. These include, increased GABAB receptor 1 [63] and AMPA receptor [64] immunoreactivities, overall increase in tau mRNA expression in the pyramidal neurons [65], reduced mRNA levels of several subunits of protein phosphatase 2A that dephosphorylates the phosphorylated species of tau [66], highly abnormal morphology of the postsynaptic components of the stratum lucidum synapses between mossy fibers of granule cells and dendrites of CA3 pyramidal neurons called the thorny excrescences [67] as well as abnormal phosphorylation of tau protein in those structures [68].
Recently, we analyzed most of the subjects utilized in the current study to determine the hippocampal expression of methionine sulfoxide reductase B3 (MSRB3)─a protein encoded by a polymorphic gene with an AD-risk allele [69, 70]. Similar to MSRB3 [71], ALK1 is expressed not only in hippocampal neurons, but also in choroid plexus and ependymal lining of the human brain (data not shown). We found reduced MRSB3 expression in the CA3 stratum lucidum in AD as compared to controls [71], consistent with abnormalities in the mossy fiber synapses. Our current data provide additional evidence for AD-related defects in CA3. It is worth noting that our control subjects, though elderly, were on average 25 years younger than the individuals with early dementia. Yet, ALK1 expression in the latter group was similar to that of controls, indicating that ALK1 levels are stable during aging, and that the changes in the ALK1 signal that we observe in advanced AD are therefore related to the pathophysiology of AD and not to age.
Overall this study suggests that the CA3 pyramidal neurons may remain responsive to the ALK1 ligands, BMP9 and BMP10 [26, 28], during initial stages of AD. Given that BMP9 administration ameliorates hippocampal AD-like pathology in mouse models of this illness [22, 23], the data suggest that ALK1 may constitute a viable therapeutic target in early and moderate AD.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Fig. 1. Polyclonal anti-ALK1 antibody is specific in human tissues. ALK1 (rabbit polyclonal anti-ALK1 1:175, HPA007041, Atlas Antibodies, Stockholm, Sweden) immunoreactivity in human superior temporal gyrus (STG) cortex (A) is blocked in adjacent section after immunoadsorption of antibody with 5X molar excess of the peptide immunogen (B). Similarly ALK1 immunoreactivity is specific in human small gut (C, D). Western blot analysis of mouse hippocampus lysates using Alk1 antibody (E). *indicates landmark vessel. Scale bar = 50 μm.
Supplementary Fig. 2. Quantitative analysis of ALK1-immunoreactivity in CA3 of human hippocampus. A) Quantitative analysis in CA3 region imaged under identical conditions at 40× was performed in 3 fields (rectangles) to consistently represent the anatomically distinct CA3 field in sections from hippocampi of all 22 subjects. For each subject three hippocampal sections, separated within the block by at least 10 μm each, were analyzed. ALK1-immunoreactivity in pyramidal neurons and in neuropil (B), was determined empirically using ImageJ software (C) for each 40 × image. The area of above-threshold ALK1 signal was determined as a percent area in ImageJ software (D). Scale bar = 1500 μm.
Acknowledgments
We thank Terri Lima, Emily Aniskovich, and Cheryl Spencer for expert immunohistochemistry advice and assistance, Dr. Joel Henderson for the use of imaging equipment, Dr. Christina Tognoni for assistance with animal studies, Kerry Cormier of Framingham Heart Study Brain Bank and Michiel Kooreman of Netherlands Brain Bank for specimen procurement, and Dr. Goran Simic for careful reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging grants AG045031, AG057768, and AG054076. The Framingham Heart Study is supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (contract no. N01-HC-25195 and no. HHSN268201500001I).
Footnotes
Authors’ disclosures available online (https://www.j-alz.com/manuscript-disclosures/17-1065r2).
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
The supplementary material is available in the electronic version of this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/jad-000000.
References
- 1.Jaeger PA, Lucin KM, Britschgi M, Vardarajan B, Huang RP, Kirby ED, Abbey R, Boeve BF, Boxer AL, Farrer LA, Finch N, Graff-Radford NR, Head E, Hoffree M, Huang R, Johns H, Karydas A, Knopman DS, Loboda A, Masliah E, Narasimhan R, Petersen RC, Podtelezhnikov A, Pradhan S, Rademakers R, Sun CH, Younkin SG, Miller BL, Ideker T, Wyss-Coray T. Network-driven plasma proteomics expose molecular changes in the Alzheimer’s brain. Mol Neurodegener. 2016;11:31. doi: 10.1186/s13024-016-0095-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Naj AC, Jun G, Beecham GW, Wang LS, Vardarajan BN, Buros J, Gallins PJ, Buxbaum JD, Jarvik GP, Crane PK, Larson EB, Bird TD, Boeve BF, Graff-Radford NR, De Jager PL, Evans D, Schneider JA, Carrasquillo MM, Ertekin-Taner N, Younkin SG, Cruchaga C, Kauwe JS, Nowotny P, Kramer P, Hardy J, Huentelman MJ, Myers AJ, Barmada MM, Demirci FY, Baldwin CT, Green RC, Rogaeva E, St George-Hyslop P, Arnold SE, Barber R, Beach T, Bigio EH, Bowen JD, Boxer A, Burke JR, Cairns NJ, Carlson CS, Carney RM, Carroll SL, Chui HC, Clark DG, Corneveaux J, Cotman CW, Cummings JL, DeCarli C, DeKosky ST, Diaz-Arrastia R, Dick M, Dickson DW, Ellis WG, Faber KM, Fallon KB, Farlow MR, Ferris S, Frosch MP, Galasko DR, Ganguli M, Gearing M, Geschwind DH, Ghetti B, Gilbert JR, Gilman S, Giordani B, Glass JD, Growdon JH, Hamilton RL, Harrell LE, Head E, Honig LS, Hulette CM, Hyman BT, Jicha GA, Jin LW, Johnson N, Karlawish J, Karydas A, Kaye JA, Kim R, Koo EH, Kowall NW, Lah JJ, Levey AI, Lieberman AP, Lopez OL, Mack WJ, Marson DC, Martiniuk F, Mash DC, Masliah E, McCormick WC, McCurry SM, McDavid AN, McKee AC, Mesulam M, Miller BL, Miller CA, Miller JW, Parisi JE, Perl DP, Peskind E, Petersen RC, Poon WW, Quinn JF, Rajbhandary RA, Raskind M, Reisberg B, Ringman JM, Roberson ED, Rosenberg RN, Sano M, Schneider LS, Seeley W, Shelanski ML, Slifer MA, Smith CD, Sonnen JA, Spina S, Stern RA, Tanzi RE, Trojanowski JQ, Troncoso JC, Van Deerlin VM, Vinters HV, Vonsattel JP, Weintraub S, Welsh-Bohmer KA, Williamson J, Woltjer RL, Cantwell LB, Dombroski BA, Beekly D, Lunetta KL, Martin ER, Kamboh MI, Saykin AJ, Reiman EM, Bennett DA, Morris JC, Montine TJ, Goate AM, Blacker D, Tsuang DW, Hakonarson H, Kukull WA, Foroud TM, Haines JL, Mayeux R, Pericak-Vance MA, Farrer LA, Schellenberg GD. Common variants at MS4A4/MS4A6E, CD2AP, CD33 and EPHA1 are associated with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet. 2011;43:436–441. doi: 10.1038/ng.801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Podtelezhnikov AA, Tanis KQ, Nebozhyn M, Ray WJ, Stone DJ, Loboda AP. Molecular insights into the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease and its relationship to normal aging. PLoS One. 2011;6:e29610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Crews L, Adame A, Patrick C, Delaney A, Pham E, Rockenstein E, Hansen L, Masliah E. Increased BMP6 levels in the brains of Alzheimer’s disease patients and APP transgenic mice are accompanied by impaired neurogenesis. J Neurosci. 2010;30:12252–12262. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1305-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sarter M, Bruno JP, Givens B. Attentional functions of cortical cholinergic inputs: what does it mean for learning and memory? Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2003;80:245–256. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7427(03)00070-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Haam J, Yakel JL. Cholinergic modulation of the hippocampal region and memory function. J Neurochem. 2017;142(Suppl 2):111–121. doi: 10.1111/jnc.14052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gauthier S, Reisberg B, Zaudig M, Petersen RC, Ritchie K, Broich K, Belleville S, Brodaty H, Bennett D, Chertkow H, Cummings JL, de Leon M, Feldman H, Ganguli M, Hampel H, Scheltens P, Tierney MC, Whitehouse P, Winblad B. Mild cognitive impairment. Lancet. 2006;367:1262–1270. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68542-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Haense C, Kalbe E, Herholz K, Hohmann C, Neumaier B, Krais R, Heiss WD. Cholinergic system function and cognition in mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33:867–877. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sarter M, Bruno JP. Developmental origins of the age-related decline in cortical cholinergic function and associated cognitive abilities. Neurobiol Aging. 2004;25:1127–1139. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2003.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mufson EJ, Counts SE, Perez SE, Ginsberg SD. Cholinergic system during the progression of Alzheimer’s disease: therapeutic implications. Expert Rev Neurother. 2008;8:1703–1718. doi: 10.1586/14737175.8.11.1703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Grothe M, Heinsen H, Teipel SJ. Atrophy of the cholinergic Basal forebrain over the adult age range and in early stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Biol Psychiatry. 2012;71:805–813. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.06.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Perez SE, Dar S, Ikonomovic MD, Dekosky ST, Mufson EJ. Cholinergic forebrain degeneration in the APPswe/PS1DeltaE9 transgenic mouse. Neurobiol Dis. 2007;28:3–15. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2007.06.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Machova E, Rudajev V, Smyckova H, Koivisto H, Tanila H, Dolezal V. Functional cholinergic damage develops with amyloid accumulation in young adult APPswe/PS1dE9 transgenic mice. Neurobiol Dis. 2010;38:27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Payette DJ, Xie J, Guo Q. Reduction in CHT1-mediated choline uptake in primary neurons from presenilin-1 M146V mutant knock-in mice. Brain Res. 2007;1135:12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Savonenko A, Xu GM, Melnikova T, Morton JL, Gonzales V, Wong MP, Price DL, Tang F, Markowska AL, Borchelt DR. Episodic-like memory deficits in the APPswe/PS1dE9 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease: relationships to beta-amyloid deposition and neurotransmitter abnormalities. Neurobiol Dis. 2005;18:602–617. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2004.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Goto Y, Niidome T, Hongo H, Akaike A, Kihara T, Sugimoto H. Impaired muscarinic regulation of excitatory synaptic transmission in the APPswe/PS1dE9 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008;583:84–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.01.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nikolajsen GN, Jensen MS, West MJ. Cholinergic axon length reduced by 300 meters in the brain of an Alzheimer mouse model. Neurobiol Aging. 2011;32:1927–1931. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lopez-Coviella I, Berse B, Krauss R, Thies RS, Blusztajn JK. Induction and maintenance of the neuronal cholinergic phenotype in the central nervous system by BMP-9. Science. 2000;289:313–316. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5477.313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lopez-Coviella I, Follettie MT, Mellott TJ, Kovacheva VP, Slack BE, Diesl V, Berse B, Thies RS, Blusztajn JK. Bone morphogenetic protein 9 induces the transcriptome of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:6984–6989. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502097102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bissonnette CJ, Lyass L, Bhattacharyya BJ, Belmadani A, Miller RJ, Kessler JA. The controlled generation of functional basal forebrain cholinergic neurons from human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2011;29:802–811. doi: 10.1002/stem.626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lopez-Coviella I, Mellott TJ, Schnitzler AC, Blusztajn JK. BMP9 protects septal neurons from axotomy-evoked loss of cholinergic phenotype. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e21166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Burke RM, Norman TA, Haydar TF, Slack BE, Leeman SE, Blusztajn JK, Mellott TJ. BMP9 ameliorates amyloidosis and the cholinergic defect in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:19567–19572. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319297110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang Z, Xiong L, Wan W, Duan L, Bai X, Zu H. Intranasal BMP9 Ameliorates Alzheimer Disease-Like Pathology and Cognitive Deficits in APP/PS1 Transgenic Mice. Front Mol Neurosci. 2017;10:32. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Brown MA, Zhao Q, Baker KA, Naik C, Chen C, Pukac L, Singh M, Tsareva T, Parice Y, Mahoney A, Roschke V, Sanyal I, Choe S. Crystal structure of BMP-9 and functional interactions with pro-region and receptors. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:25111–25118. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M503328200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Scharpfenecker M, van Dinther M, Liu Z, van Bezooijen RL, Zhao Q, Pukac L, Lowik CW, Ten Dijke P. BMP-9 signals via ALK1 and inhibits bFGF-induced endothelial cell proliferation and VEGF-stimulated angiogenesis. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:964–972. doi: 10.1242/jcs.002949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.David L, Mallet C, Mazerbourg S, Feige JJ, Bailly S. Identification of BMP9 and BMP10 as functional activators of the orphan activin receptor-like kinase 1 (ALK1) in endothelial cells. Blood. 2007;109:1953–1961. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-034124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Upton PD, Davies RJ, Trembath RC, Morrell NW. Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and activin type II receptors balance BMP9 signals mediated by activin receptor-like kinase-1 in human pulmonary artery endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:15794–15804. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.002881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Townson SA, Martinez-Hackert E, Greppi C, Lowden P, Sako D, Liu J, Ucran JA, Liharska K, Underwood KW, Seehra J, Kumar R, Grinberg AV. Specificity and structure of a high affinity activin receptor-like kinase 1 (ALK1) signaling complex. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:27313–27325. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.377960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.David L, Feige JJ, Bailly S. Emerging role of bone morphogenetic proteins in angiogenesis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2009;20:203–212. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2009.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pardali E, Goumans MJ, ten Dijke P. Signaling by members of the TGF-beta family in vascular morphogenesis and disease. Trends Cell Biol. 2010;20:556–567. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Roman BL, Hinck AP. ALK1 signaling in development and disease: new paradigms. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017;74:4539–4560. doi: 10.1007/s00018-017-2636-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Abdalla SA, Letarte M. Hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia: current views on genetics and mechanisms of disease. J Med Genet. 2006;43:97–110. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2005.030833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Schnitzler AC, Mellott TJ, Lopez-Coviella I, Tallini YN, Kotlikoff MI, Follettie MT, Blusztajn JK. BMP9 (bone morphogenetic protein 9) induces NGF as an autocrine/paracrine cholinergic trophic factor in developing basal forebrain neurons. J Neurosci. 2010;30:8221–8228. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5611-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Konig HG, Kogel D, Rami A, Prehn JH. TGF-β1 activates two distinct type I receptors in neurons: implications for neuronal NF-ϰB signaling. J Cell Biol. 2005;168:1077–1086. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200407027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Blessed G, Tomlinson BE, Roth M. The association between quantitative measures of dementia and of senile change in the cerebral grey matter of elderly subjects. Br J Psychiatry. 1968;114:797–811. doi: 10.1192/bjp.114.512.797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hachinski VC, Iliff LD, Zilhka E, Du Boulay GH, McAllister VL, Marshall J, Russell RW, Symon L. Cerebral blood flow in dementia. Arch Neurol. 1975;32:632–637. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1975.00490510088009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Davis PB, White H, Price JL, McKeel D, Robins LN. Retrospective postmortem dementia assessment. Validation of a new clinical interview to assist neuropathologic study. Arch Neurol. 1991;48:613–617. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1991.00530180069019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Braak H, Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol. 1991;82:239–259. doi: 10.1007/BF00308809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Au R, Seshadri S, Knox K, Beiser A, Himali JJ, Cabral HJ, Auerbach S, Green RC, Wolf PA, McKee AC. The Framingham Brain Donation Program: neuropathology along the cognitive continuum. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2012;9:673–686. doi: 10.2174/156720512801322609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Crary JF, Trojanowski JQ, Schneider JA, Abisambra JF, Abner EL, Alafuzoff I, Arnold SE, Attems J, Beach TG, Bigio EH, Cairns NJ, Dickson DW, Gearing M, Grinberg LT, Hof PR, Hyman BT, Jellinger K, Jicha GA, Kovacs GG, Knopman DS, Kofler J, Kukull WA, Mackenzie IR, Masliah E, McKee A, Montine TJ, Murray ME, Neltner JH, Santa-Maria I, Seeley WW, Serrano-Pozo A, Shelanski ML, Stein T, Takao M, Thal DR, Toledo JB, Troncoso JC, Vonsattel JP, White CL, 3rd, Wisniewski T, Woltjer RL, Yamada M, Nelson PT. Primary age-related tauopathy (PART): a common pathology associated with human aging. Acta Neuropathol. 2014;128:755–766. doi: 10.1007/s00401-014-1349-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International. 2004;11 [Google Scholar]
- 42.Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Preibisch S, Saalfeld S, Tomancak P. Globally optimal stitching of tiled 3D microscopic image acquisitions. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1463–1465. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lucero HA, Patterson S, Matsuura S, Ravid K. Quantitative histological image analyses of reticulin fibers in a myelofibrotic mouse. J Biol Methods. 2016;3 doi: 10.14440/jbm.2016.152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Adams SL, Tilton K, Kozubek JA, Seshadri S, Delalle I. Subcellular Changes in Bridging Integrator 1 Protein Expression in the Cerebral Cortex During the Progression of Alzheimer Disease Pathology. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2016;75:779–790. doi: 10.1093/jnen/nlw056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kesner RP. A process analysis of the CA3 subregion of the hippocampus. Front Cell Neurosci. 2013;7:78. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2013.00078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Guzman SJ, Schlogl A, Frotscher M, Jonas P. Synaptic mechanisms of pattern completion in the hippocampal CA3 network. Science. 2016;353:1117–1123. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf1836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sun Q, Sotayo A, Cazzulino AS, Snyder AM, Denny CA, Siegelbaum SA. Proximodistal Heterogeneity of Hippocampal CA3 Pyramidal Neuron Intrinsic Properties, Connectivity, and Reactivation during Memory Recall. Neuron. 2017;95:656–672 e653. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.07.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gritti I, Henny P, Galloni F, Mainville L, Mariotti M, Jones BE. Stereological estimates of the basal forebrain cell population in the rat, including neurons containing choline acetyltransferase, glutamic acid decarboxylase or phosphate-activated glutaminase and colocalizing vesicular glutamate transporters. Neuroscience. 2006;143:1051–1064. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.09.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Freund TF, Antal M. GABA-containing neurons in the septum control inhibitory interneurons in the hippocampus. Nature. 1988;336:170–173. doi: 10.1038/336170a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Blasco-Ibanez JM, Freund TF. Synaptic input of horizontal interneurons in stratum oriens of the hippocampal CA1 subfield: structural basis of feed-back activation. Eur J Neurosci. 1995;7:2170–2180. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1995.tb00638.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hattori A, Katayama M, Iwasaki S, Ishii K, Tsujimoto M, Kohno M. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 promotes survival and differentiation of striatal GABAergic neurons in the absence of glial cell proliferation. J Neurochem. 1999;72:2264–2271. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.0722264.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gratacos E, Gavalda N, Alberch J. Bone morphogenetic protein-6 is a neurotrophic factor for calbindin-positive striatal neurons. J Neurosci Res. 2002;70:638–644. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Benes FM, Lim B, Matzilevich D, Walsh JP, Subburaju S, Minns M. Regulation of the GABA cell phenotype in hippocampus of schizophrenics and bipolars. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703806104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hyman BT, Van Hoesen GW, Damasio AR, Barnes CL. Alzheimer’s disease: cell-specific pathology isolates the hippocampal formation. Science. 1984;225:1168–1170. doi: 10.1126/science.6474172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Flood DG, Guarnaccia M, Coleman PD. Dendritic extent in human CA2-3 hippocampal pyramidal neurons in normal aging and senile dementia. Brain Res. 1987;409:88–96. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)90744-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Braak H, Braak E, Bohl J. Staging of Alzheimer-related cortical destruction. Eur Neurol. 1993;33:403–408. doi: 10.1159/000116984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Fukutani Y, Cairns NJ, Shiozawa M, Sasaki K, Sudo S, Isaki K, Lantos PL. Neuronal loss and neurofibrillary degeneration in the hippocampal cortex in late-onset sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000;54:523–529. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1819.2000.00747.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lace G, Savva GM, Forster G, de Silva R, Brayne C, Matthews FE, Barclay JJ, Dakin L, Ince PG, Wharton SB, Mrc C. Hippocampal tau pathology is related to neuroanatomical connections: an ageing population-based study. Brain. 2009;132:1324–1334. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Schonheit B, Zarski R, Ohm TG. Spatial and temporal relationships between plaques and tangles in Alzheimer-pathology. Neurobiol Aging. 2004;25:697–711. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2003.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Montagne A, Barnes SR, Sweeney MD, Halliday MR, Sagare AP, Zhao Z, Toga AW, Jacobs RE, Liu CY, Amezcua L, Harrington MG, Chui HC, Law M, Zlokovic BV. Blood-brain barrier breakdown in the aging human hippocampus. Neuron. 2015;85:296–302. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Beckelman BC, Zhou X, Keene CD, Ma T. Impaired Eukaryotic Elongation Factor 1A Expression in Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurodegener Dis. 2016;16:39–43. doi: 10.1159/000438925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Iwakiri M, Mizukami K, Ikonomovic MD, Ishikawa M, Hidaka S, Abrahamson EE, DeKosky ST, Asada T. Changes in hippocampal GABABR1 subunit expression in Alzheimer’s patients: association with Braak staging. Acta Neuropathol. 2005;109:467–474. doi: 10.1007/s00401-005-0985-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Armstrong DM, Ikonomovic MD. AMPA-selective glutamate receptor subtype immunoreactivity in the hippocampal dentate gyrus of patients with Alzheimer disease. Evidence for hippocampal plasticity. Mol Chem Neuropathol. 1996;28:59–64. doi: 10.1007/BF02815205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Barton AJL, Harrison PJ, Najlerahim A, Heffernan J, McDonald B, Robinson JR, Davies DC, Harrison WJ, Mitra P, Hardy JA, Pearson RCA. Increased tau messenger RNA in Alzheimer’s disease hippocampus. Am J Pathol. 1990;137:497–502. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Vogelsberg-Ragaglia V, Schuck T, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VMY. PP2A mRNA expression is quantitatively decreased in Alzheimer’s disease hippocampus. Exp Neurol. 2001;168:402–412. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2001.7630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Tsamis IK, Mytilinaios GD, Njau NS, Fotiou FD, Glaftsi S, Costa V, Baloyannis JS. Properties of CA3 dendritic excrescences in Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2010;7:84–90. doi: 10.2174/156720510790274482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Blazquez-Llorca L, Garcia-Marin V, Merino-Serrais P, Avila J, DeFelipe J. Abnormal tau phosphorylation in the thorny excrescences of CA3 hippocampal neurons in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;26:683–698. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-110659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Bis JC, DeCarli C, Smith AV, van der Lijn F, Crivello F, Fornage M, Debette S, Shulman JM, Schmidt H, Srikanth V, Schuur M, Yu L, Choi SH, Sigurdsson S, Verhaaren BF, DeStefano AL, Lambert JC, Jack CR, Jr, Struchalin M, Stankovich J, Ibrahim-Verbaas CA, Fleischman D, Zijdenbos A, den Heijer T, Mazoyer B, Coker LH, Enzinger C, Danoy P, Amin N, Arfanakis K, van Buchem MA, de Bruijn RF, Beiser A, Dufouil C, Huang J, Cavalieri M, Thomson R, Niessen WJ, Chibnik LB, Gislason GK, Hofman A, Pikula A, Amouyel P, Freeman KB, Phan TG, Oostra BA, Stein JL, Medland SE, Vasquez AA, Hibar DP, Wright MJ, Franke B, Martin NG, Thompson PM, Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis C. Nalls MA, Uitterlinden AG, Au R, Elbaz A, Beare RJ, van Swieten JC, Lopez OL, Harris TB, Chouraki V, Breteler MM, De Jager PL, Becker JT, Vernooij MW, Knopman D, Fazekas F, Wolf PA, van der Lugt A, Gudnason V, Longstreth WT, Jr, Brown MA, Bennett DA, van Duijn CM, Mosley TH, Schmidt R, Tzourio C, Launer LJ, Ikram MA, Seshadri S, Cohorts for H, Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology C Common variants at 12q14 and 12q24 are associated with hippocampal volume. Nat Genet. 2012;44:545–551. doi: 10.1038/ng.2237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Hibar DP, Adams HH, Jahanshad N, Chauhan G, Stein JL, Hofer E, Renteria ME, Bis JC, Arias-Vasquez A, Ikram MK, Desrivieres S, Vernooij MW, Abramovic L, Alhusaini S, Amin N, Andersson M, Arfanakis K, Aribisala BS, Armstrong NJ, Athanasiu L, Axelsson T, Beecham AH, Beiser A, Bernard M, Blanton SH, Bohlken MM, Boks MP, Bralten J, Brickman AM, Carmichael O, Chakravarty MM, Chen Q, Ching CR, Chouraki V, Cuellar-Partida G, Crivello F, Den Braber A, Doan NT, Ehrlich S, Giddaluru S, Goldman AL, Gottesman RF, Grimm O, Griswold ME, Guadalupe T, Gutman BA, Hass J, Haukvik UK, Hoehn D, Holmes AJ, Hoogman M, Janowitz D, Jia T, Jorgensen KN, Karbalai N, Kasperaviciute D, Kim S, Klein M, Kraemer B, Lee PH, Liewald DC, Lopez LM, Luciano M, Macare C, Marquand AF, Matarin M, Mather KA, Mattheisen M, McKay DR, Milaneschi Y, Munoz Maniega S, Nho K, Nugent AC, Nyquist P, Loohuis LM, Oosterlaan J, Papmeyer M, Pirpamer L, Putz B, Ramasamy A, Richards JS, Risacher SL, Roiz-Santianez R, Rommelse N, Ropele S, Rose EJ, Royle NA, Rundek T, Samann PG, Saremi A, Satizabal CL, Schmaal L, Schork AJ, Shen L, Shin J, Shumskaya E, Smith AV, Sprooten E, Strike LT, Teumer A, Tordesillas-Gutierrez D, Toro R, Trabzuni D, Trompet S, Vaidya D, Van der Grond J, Van der Lee SJ, Van der Meer D, Van Donkelaar MM, Van Eijk KR, Van Erp TG, Van Rooij D, Walton E, Westlye LT, Whelan CD, Windham BG, Winkler AM, Wittfeld K, Woldehawariat G, Wolf C, Wolfers T, Yanek LR, Yang J, Zijdenbos A, Zwiers MP, Agartz I, Almasy L, Ames D, Amouyel P, Andreassen OA, Arepalli S, Assareh AA, Barral S, Bastin ME, Becker DM, Becker JT, Bennett DA, Blangero J, van Bokhoven H, Boomsma DI, Brodaty H, Brouwer RM, Brunner HG, Buckner RL, Buitelaar JK, Bulayeva KB, Cahn W, Calhoun VD, Cannon DM, Cavalleri GL, Cheng CY, Cichon S, Cookson MR, Corvin A, Crespo-Facorro B, Curran JE, Czisch M, Dale AM, Davies GE, De Craen AJ, De Geus EJ, De Jager PL, De Zubicaray GI, Deary IJ, Debette S, DeCarli C, Delanty N, Depondt C, DeStefano A, Dillman A, Djurovic S, Donohoe G, Drevets WC, Duggirala R, Dyer TD, Enzinger C, Erk S, Espeseth T, Fedko IO, Fernandez G, Ferrucci L, Fisher SE, Fleischman DA, Ford I, Fornage M, Foroud TM, Fox PT, Francks C, Fukunaga M, Gibbs JR, Glahn DC, Gollub RL, Goring HH, Green RC, Gruber O, Gudnason V, Guelfi S, Haberg AK, Hansell NK, Hardy J, Hartman CA, Hashimoto R, Hegenscheid K, Heinz A, Le Hellard S, Hernandez DG, Heslenfeld DJ, Ho BC, Hoekstra PJ, Hoffmann W, Hofman A, Holsboer F, Homuth G, Hosten N, Hottenga JJ, Huentelman M, Pol HE, Ikeda M, Jack CR, Jr, Jenkinson M, Johnson R, Jonsson EG, Jukema JW, Kahn RS, Kanai R, Kloszewska I, Knopman DS, Kochunov P, Kwok JB, Lawrie SM, Lemaitre H, Liu X, Longo DL, Lopez OL, Lovestone S, Martinez O, Martinot JL, Mattay VS, McDonald C, McIntosh AM, McMahon FJ, McMahon KL, Mecocci P, Melle I, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Mohnke S, Montgomery GW, Morris DW, Mosley TH, Muhleisen TW, Muller-Myhsok B, Nalls MA, Nauck M, Nichols TE, Niessen WJ, Nothen MM, Nyberg L, Ohi K, Olvera RL, Ophoff RA, Pandolfo M, Paus T, Pausova Z, Penninx BW, Pike GB, Potkin SG, Psaty BM, Reppermund S, Rietschel M, Roffman JL, Romanczuk-Seiferth N, Rotter JI, Ryten M, Sacco RL, Sachdev PS, Saykin AJ, Schmidt R, Schmidt H, Schofield PR, Sigursson S, Simmons A, Singleton A, Sisodiya SM, Smith C, Smoller JW, Soininen H, Steen VM, Stott DJ, Sussmann JE, Thalamuthu A, Toga AW, Traynor BJ, Troncoso J, Tsolaki M, Tzourio C, Uitterlinden AG, Hernandez MC, Van der Brug M, van der Lugt A, van der Wee NJ, Van Haren NE, van ’t Ent D, Van Tol MJ, Vardarajan BN, Vellas B, Veltman DJ, Volzke H, Walter H, Wardlaw JM, Wassink TH, Weale ME, Weinberger DR, Weiner MW, Wen W, Westman E, White T, Wong TY, Wright CB, Zielke RH, Zonderman AB, Martin NG, Van Duijn CM, Wright MJ, Longstreth WT, Schumann G, Grabe HJ, Franke B, Launer LJ, Medland SE, Seshadri S, Thompson PM, Ikram MA. Novel genetic loci associated with hippocampal volume. Nat Commun. 2017;8:13624. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Adams SL, Benayoun L, Tilton K, Chavez OR, Himali JJ, Blusztajn JK, Seshadri S, Delalle I. Methionine sulfoxide reductase-B3 (MsrB3) protein associates with synaptic vesicles and its expression changes in the hippocampi of Alzheimer’s disease patients. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;60:43–56. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary Fig. 1. Polyclonal anti-ALK1 antibody is specific in human tissues. ALK1 (rabbit polyclonal anti-ALK1 1:175, HPA007041, Atlas Antibodies, Stockholm, Sweden) immunoreactivity in human superior temporal gyrus (STG) cortex (A) is blocked in adjacent section after immunoadsorption of antibody with 5X molar excess of the peptide immunogen (B). Similarly ALK1 immunoreactivity is specific in human small gut (C, D). Western blot analysis of mouse hippocampus lysates using Alk1 antibody (E). *indicates landmark vessel. Scale bar = 50 μm.
Supplementary Fig. 2. Quantitative analysis of ALK1-immunoreactivity in CA3 of human hippocampus. A) Quantitative analysis in CA3 region imaged under identical conditions at 40× was performed in 3 fields (rectangles) to consistently represent the anatomically distinct CA3 field in sections from hippocampi of all 22 subjects. For each subject three hippocampal sections, separated within the block by at least 10 μm each, were analyzed. ALK1-immunoreactivity in pyramidal neurons and in neuropil (B), was determined empirically using ImageJ software (C) for each 40 × image. The area of above-threshold ALK1 signal was determined as a percent area in ImageJ software (D). Scale bar = 1500 μm.
