Abstract
The isolation and identification of a series of new pseudoceratidine (1) derivatives from the sponge Tedania brasiliensis enabled the evaluation of their anti-parasitic activity against Plasmodium falciparum, Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis, Leishmania (Leishmania) infantum and Trypanosoma cruzi, the causative agents of malaria, cutaneous leishmaniasis, visceral leishmaniasis and Chagas disease, respectively. The new 3-debromopseudoceratidine (4), 20-debromopseudoceratidine (5), 4-bromopseudoceratidine (6), 19-bromopseudoceratidine (7) and 4,19-dibromopseudoceratidine (8) are reported. New tedamides A – D (9 – 12), with an unprecedented 4-bromo-4-methoxy-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxamide moiety, are also described. Compounds 4 and 5, 6 and 7, 9 and 10, and 11 and 12 have been isolated as pairs of inseparable structural isomers differing in their sites of bromination or oxidation. Tedamides 9+10 and 11+12 were obtained as optically active pairs, indicating an enzymatic formation rather than an artefactual origin. N12-Acetyl pseudoceratidine (2) and N12-formyl pseudoceratidine (3) were obtained by derivatization of pseudoceratidine (1). The anti-parasitic activity of pseudoceratidine (1) led us to synthesize 23 derivatives (16, 17, 20, 21, 23, 25, 27 – 29, 31, 33, 35, 38, 39, 42, 43, 46, 47, 50 and 51) with variations in the polyamine chain and aromatic moiety in sufficient amounts for biological evaluation in anti-parasitic assays. The measured anti-malarial activity of pseudoceratidine (1) and derivatives 4, 5, 16, 23, 25, 31 and 50 provided an initial SAR evaluation of these compounds as potential leads for anti-parasitics against Leishmania amastigotes and against Plasmodium falciparum. The results obtained indicate that pseudoceratidine represents a promising scaffold for the development of new anti-malarial drugs.
Graphical Abstract

Bromopyrrole alkaloids isolated from marine sponges encompass a remarkable chemical diversity of potently bioactive compounds. These metabolites range from oroidin-related archetypal motifs to structurally complex oroidin-tetramers, the stylissadines.1–3 Such alkaloids are prevalent in sponges belonging to the order Agelasida (particularly within the genus Agelas, family Agelasidae).1–3 Nevertheless, several of these alkaloids have also been found in sponges of the genera Axinella (Axinellidae, Halichondrida), Axinyssa (Halichondriidae, Halichondrida), Callyspongia (Callyspongiidae, Haplosclerida), Eurypon (Raspailiidae, Poecilosclerida), Homaxinella (Suberitidae, Hadromerida), Hymeniacidon (Halichondriidae, Halichondrida) and Stylissa (Halichondriidae, Halichondrida).1–7 Therefore, past assumptions on the character of bromopyrrole alkaloids as chemotaxonomical markers of these sponges4–7 are now challenged by their more widespread occurrence. Such is also the case for our present isolation of pseudoceratidine (1) derivatives from the marine sponge Tedania brasiliensis (Tedaniidae, Poecilosclerida).
Pseudoceratidine (1) was previously isolated solely from the sponge Pseudoceratina purpurea (Pseudoceratinidae, Verongida).8,9 The compound displayed more potent anti-fouling activity than its mono-substituted 4,5-dibromo-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid spermidine analogs.10 In these previous studies, it was found that both the substitution pattern of the terminal rings and the length of the triamine chain of pseudoceratidine derivatives affect the anti-fouling activity. Furthermore, pseudoceratidine also displayed the most potent antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli and Serratia liquefaciens.11 In the present investigation, we report the anti-parasitic activity of pseudoceratidine and several new synthetic pseudoceratidine derivatives against Plasmodium falciparum, Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis, L. (L.) infantum and Trypanosoma cruzi.
Malaria, caused by Plasmodium spp., is among the most devastating vector-born humans infectious diseases. It is estimated that over 3.4 billion people worldwide are at risk of infection. Malaria is prevalent in tropical and sub-tropical regions, affecting 212 million people and causing 429,000 deaths in 2015. In Africa, P. falciparum is responsible for the highest mortality rate of children under 5 years of age. Malaria etiologic agents have developed resistance to several antimalarial drugs, including emerging resistance to artemisinin and artemisinin-based combination therapies that comprise current first-line treatments.12 Thus, the discovery of new antimalarial lead compounds is of utmost importance.
Leishmaniasis is a group of diseases caused by several species of protozoan parasites belonging to the genus Leishmania endemic in more than 80 countries.13 Transmitted by different sandfly species, Leishmania parasites infect cells from the mononuclear phagocytic system leading to clinical manifestations that vary from localized, disseminated and diffuse skin lesions (cutaneous leishmaniasis) to a systemic multi-organ infection (visceral leishmaniasis). Visceral leishmaniasis is fatal if left untreated. Treatment options are limited to parenteral drugs, including pentavalent antimonials as the first-line drugs, which very often presents severe side effects. The utilization of liposomal amphotericin B and oral miltefosine proved useful for treating patients with visceral leishmaniasis. Nevertheless, the high cost of liposomal amphotericin B and the miltefosine teratogenic effect, in addition to its long half-life, hampers the therapeutic success of such treatments.14,15 Therefore, the identification of new drug candidates for leishmaniasis treatment remains imperative in the current therapeutic scenario.
Trypanosoma cruzi is the causative agent of Chagas disease, which may lead to fatal disorders such as cardiomegaly and megacolon in approximately 30% of patients.16 The disease is an emerging health issue in North America and Europe.17–19 Approximately 8–10 million people in Latin American countries are infected by T. cruzi, with an annual death rate of approximately 14,000 people.18,19 Benznidazole, toxic and of limited efficacy, is the only available therapy in Brazil for Chagas disease. No effective treatment exists for chronic phase patients affected by Chagas disease.20 Thus, the discovery of new therapies for Chagas disease is sorely needed. Furthermore, there are no approved vaccines for the treatment of humans to prevent malaria, leishmaniasis or Chagas disease.
In our continuing search for anti-parasitic marine metabolites,21–24 we verified that the MeOH anti-parasitic extract of T. brasiliensis contained pseudoceratidine (1) as the most abundant metabolite. Related minor constituents were detected only by HPLC-UV-MS because of the high abundance of 1 in the sponge extract. Several chromatographic separations of this extract yielded a series of minor pseudoceratidine derivatives. These include the new tedamides A – D (9 – 12), along with the new 3-debromopseudoceratidine (4), 20-debromopseudoceratidine (5), 4-bromopseudoceratidine (6), 19-bromopseudoceratidine (7) and 4,19-dibromopseudoceratidine (8). Compounds 4 and 5, 6 and 7, 9 and 10, as well as 11 and 12 have been isolated as pairs of inseparable structural isomers differing in their sites of bromination or oxidation. Since pseudoceratidine displayed good anti-P. falciparum activity, we prepared a series of pseudoceratidine derivatives with different polyamine and aromatic moieties, aiming to assess their anti-Plasmodium falciparum, anti-Leishmania spp. and anti-T. cruzi activities and begin evaluation of their structure-activity relationships.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Isolation and Identification of Natural Pseudoceratidine Derivatives
Analysis of the HRMS and NMR data of 18,9 facilitated the identification of minor pseudoceratidine congeners 4 – 12 (Tables 1 – 4) that were all isolated as their formate salts. The inseparable mixture of 3-debromopseudoceratidine (4) and 20-debromopseudoceratidine (5) displayed a protonated molecule cluster at m/z 565.9409/567.9389/569.9370/571.9354 with peaks showing relative intensities of 1:3:3:1. The [M+H]+ ion at m/z 565.9409 corresponded to the formula C17H2379Br3N5O2, with one fewer bromine atom and one more hydrogen atom than 1. Monobromo substitution at one of the pyrrole moieties was verified in the COSY spectrum of 4 and 5. Coupling between two hydrogens was observed in one of the pyrrole rings, at δH 6.11 (dd, J = 2.5 and 3.7 Hz, H-4 or H-19) and at δH 6.71/6.72 (dd, J = 2.5 and 2.7 Hz, H-3 or H-20), both of which coupled with an NH group at δH 12.13/12.18 (br s). A doublet at δH 6.89/6.90 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, H-4 or H-19) was assigned to the hydrogen of a 2,3-dibromosubstituted pyrrole group, which coupled only to the NH group at δH 12.67/12.63 (d, J = 2.2 Hz). Analysis of the COSY spectrum of 4 indicated that H-4 (δH 6.11, dd, J = 2.5 and 3.7 Hz) was vicinal to H-3 δH 6.72 (dd, J = 2.5 and 2.7 Hz). In the HMBC spectrum, H-4 coupled with C-2 (δC 102.7), C-5 (δC 128.4) and C-6 (δC 159.9), whereas NH-7 (δH 8.03, t, J = 5.7 Hz) coupled with C-6 and C-8 (δC 38.0). These couplings indicated that in 4 the monobromopyrrole-2-carboxylic acid group was attached to the NH amide connected to the four-methylene moiety of spermidine, because H2-8 showed couplings to H2-9 in the COSY spectrum and to C-9 and C-10 in the HMBC spectrum. Considering the NMR data of 4, the dibromopyrrole-2-carboxylic acid group had to be attached to the three-methylene moiety of spermidine. Indeed, H-19 (δH 6.90, d, J = 2.2 Hz) coupled with C-18 (δC 128.1) and with C-21 (δC 104.9), whereas NH-16 (δH 8.24, t, J = 6.0 Hz) coupled with C-15 (δC 36.0) and C-17 (δC 159.1). In the HMBC spectrum, the isomeric compound 5 shows H-4 (δH 6.89, d, J = 2.2 Hz) at the dibromopyrrolecarboxylic acid group coupling with C-2 (δC 104.7), C-5 (δC 128.0) and C-6 (δC 159.4), whereas NH-7 (δH 8.14, t, J = 5.7 Hz) coupled with C-6 at δC 159.4 and with C-8 (δC 37.9). At the other end of the spermidine chain of 5, H-19 (δH 6.13, dd, J = 2.2 and 3.7 Hz) showed a coupling with H-20 (δH 6.71, dd, J = 2.5 and 2.7 Hz) in the COSY spectrum and coupled with C-18 (δC 128.3) and with C-21 (δC 102.4) in the HMBC spectrum. Unambiguous 1H and 13C assignments were also based on the relative integration of the 1H signals of 4 and 5, those of 4 being slightly higher than those of 5, with a relative abundance of approximately 55/45, respectively. The 1H and 13C signals for the methylene groups of the spermidine chain were essentially the same for 4 and 5 (Tables 1 and 2) and identical to those of 1. Thus, the structures of 3-debromopseudoceratidine (4) and 20-debromopseudoceratidine (5) were established.
Table 1.
1H NMR Data (δ, ppm) for Pseudoceratidines 2–8 in DMSO-d6
| Position | 2b (J in Hz) | 3b (J in Hz) | 4a (J in Hz) | 5a (J in Hz) | 6b (J in Hz) | 7b (J in Hz) | 8b (J in Hz) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-H | 12.60, br s | 12.63/12.61, s | 12.18, br s | 12.63, d (2.2) | n.o. | n.o. | n.o. |
| 2 | |||||||
| 3 | 6.72, dd (2.5, 2.7) | ||||||
| 4 | 6.86, m | 6.88/6.87, s | 6.11, dd (2.5, 3.7) | 6.89, d (2.2) | 6.89, s | ||
| 5 | |||||||
| 6 | |||||||
| N-H | 8.06, t (5.6)/8.04, m | 8.10, m | 8.03, t (5.7) | 8.14, t (5.7) | 7.76, t (6.1) | 8.14, t (5.6) | 7.34, br t |
| 8 | 3.19, m | 3.21/3.17, m | 3.20, m | 3.20, m | 3.25, m | 3.21, m | 3.16, m |
| 9 | 1.47/1.41, m | 1.40/1.37, m | 1.52, m | 1.52, m | 1.53, m | 1.52, m | 1.48, m |
| 10 | 1.53/1.45, m | 1.49/1.45, m | 1.57, m | 1.57, m | 1.58, m | 1.58, m | 1.57, m |
| 11 | 3.24/3.21, m | 3.24/3.20, m | 2.90, br m | 2.90, br m | 2.90, m | 2.89, m | 2.88, t (7.4) |
| N-H | n.o. | n.o. | n.o. | n.o. | n.o. | n.o. | n.o. |
| 13 | 3.25/3.24, m | 3.23/3.22, m | 2.90, br m | 2.90, br m | 2.90, m | 2.86, m | 2.83, t (7.4) |
| 14 | 1.73/1.64, m | 1.68/1.64, m | 1.77, m | 1.77, m | 1.79, m | 1.76, m | 1.73, m |
| 15 | 3.17, m | 3.16/3.15, m | 3.25, m | 3.25, m | 3.29, m | 3.25, m | 3.20, q (6.2) |
| N-H | 8.09, t (5.6)/8.04, m | 8.10, m | 8.24, t (6.0) | 8.15, t (5.7) | 8.24, t (5.6) | 7.72, t (6.0) | 7.61, t (6.0) |
| 17 | |||||||
| 18 | |||||||
| 19 | 6.89, m | 6.88/6.87, s | 6.90, d (2.2) | 6.13, dd (2.5, 3.7) | 6.90 s | ||
| 20 | 6.71, dd (2.5, 2.7) | ||||||
| 21 | |||||||
| N-H | 12.60, br s | 12.63/12.61, s | 12.67, d (2.2) | 12.13, br s | n.o. | n.o. | n.o. |
| 23 | 8.00/7.99, s | ||||||
| 24 | 1.97/1.94, s |
400 MHz;
600 MHz;
n.o.: not observed; 1H signals for the HCO2− counterion observed between δH 8.12 and 8.33 for all compounds.
Table 4.
13C NMR Data (δ, ppm) for Tedamides A–D (9–12) in DMSO-d6
| Position | 9a δC, type | 10a δC, type | 11b δC, type | 12b δC, type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 104.6, C | 167.1, C | n.o. | 167.3, C |
| 3 | 97.9, C | 92.1, C | n.o. | 92.29, C |
| 4 | 112.6, CH | 144.5, CH | n.o. | 144.73, CH |
| 5 | 128.3, C | 121.5, C | n.o. | 121.71, C |
| 6 | 159.0, C | 165.6, C | 160.4, C | 165.8, C |
| 8 | 38.0, CH2 | 38.7, CH2 | 37.9, CH2 | 38.8, CH2 |
| 9 | 26.4, CH2 | 26.1, CH2 | 26.67, CH2 | 26.1, CH2 |
| 10 | 23.2, CH2 | 23.1, CH2 | 23.3, CH2 | 23.2, CH2 |
| 11 | 46.7, CH2 | 46.6, CH2 | 46.9, CH2 | 46.7, CH2 |
| 13 | 44.7, CH2 | 44.9, CH2 | 44.9, CH2 | 44.8, CH2 |
| 14 | 25.8, CH2 | 26.3, CH2 | 25.9, CH2 | 26.6, CH2 |
| 15 | 36.5, CH2 | 35.9, CH2 | 36.6, CH2 | 35.5, CH2 |
| 17 | 166.0, C | 159.3, C | 166.2, C | 162.0, C |
| 18 | 121.6, C | 128.1, C | 121.79, C | n.o. |
| 19 | 144.5, CH | 112.8, CH | 144.72, CH | n.o. |
| 20 | 92.0, C | 98.0, C | 92.21, C | n.o. |
| 21 | 167.2, C | 104.8, C | 167.4, C | n.o. |
| 23 | 51.1, CH3 | 51.1, CH3 | 51.3, CH3 | 51.3, CH3 |
100 MHz;
150 MHz;
n.o.: not observed
Table 2.
13C NMR Data (δ, ppm) for Pseudoceratidines 2–8 in DMSO-d6
| Position | 2b δC, type | 3b δC, type | 4aδC, type | 5aδC, type | 6bδC, type | 7bδC, type | 8bδC, type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 104.6, C | 104.77/104.68, C | 102.7, C | 104.7, C | n.o. | 104.6, C | n.o. |
| 3 | 97.9, C | 98.09/98.07, C | 111.7, CH | 98.0, C | n.o. | 97.9, C | n.o. |
| 4 | 112.5, CH | 112.8/112.6, CH | 111.0, CH | 112.9, CH | n.o. | 112.6, CH | n.o. |
| 5 | 128.4, C | 128.53/128.47, C | 128.4, C | 128.0, C | n.o. | 128.3, C | n.o. |
| 6 | 158.93/159.0, C | 159.2/159.15, C | 159.9, C | 159.4, C | n.o. | 159.1, C | 162.8, C |
| 8 | 38.5/38.3, CH2 | 38.5/38.3, CH2 | 38.0, CH2 | 37.9, CH2 | 38.3, CH2 | 38.0, CH2 | 37.3, CH2 |
| 9 | 26.8/26.6, CH2 | 26.8/26.4, CH2 | 26.52, CH2 | 26.6, CH2 | 26.37, CH2 | 26.5, CH2 | 27.0, CH2 |
| 10 | 26.0/25.0, CH2 | 25.8/24.5, CH2 | 23.3, CH2 | 23.4, CH2 | 23.31, CH2 | 23.3, CH2 | 23.4, CH2 |
| 11 | 47.8/44.5, CH2 | 46.4/40.1, CH2 | 46.8, CH2 | 46.9, CH2 | 46.80, CH2 | 46.7, CH2 | 46.9, CH2 |
| 13 | 45.8/42.7, CH2 | 44.2/41.0, CH2 | 45.07, CH2 | 45.09, CH2 | 44.9, CH2 | 44.7, CH2 | 44.8, CH2 |
| 14 | 28.8/27.8, CH2 | 28.2/27.4, CH2 | 26.4, CH2 | 26.57, CH2 | 26.2, CH2 | 26.5, CH2 | 26.9, CH2 |
| 15 | 36.5/36.3, CH2 | 36.6/36.0, CH2 | 36.0, CH2 | 35.8, CH2 | 36.0, CH2 | 35.3, CH2 | 34.8, CH2 |
| 17 | 158.95/159.1, C | 159.2/159.13, C | 159.1, C | 160.2, C | 159.4, C | 162.0, C | 163.9, C |
| 18 | 128.3, C | 128.50/128.41, C | 128.1, C | 128.3, C | 128.3, C | n.o. | n.o. |
| 19 | 112.4, CH | 112.8/112.6, CH | 112.7, CH | 111.1, CH | 112.8, CH | n.o. | n.o. |
| 20 | 97.9, C | 98.09/98.07, C | 98.1, C | 112.0, CH | 98.0, C | n.o. | n.o. |
| 21 | 104.5, C | 104.75/104.63, C | 104.9, C | 102.4, C | 104.6, C | n.o. | n.o. |
| 23 | 169.6/169.3, C | 163.2/163.1, CH | |||||
| 24 | 21.4/21.3, CH3 |
100 MHz;
150 MHz;
n.o.: not observed
A fraction presenting an inseparable mixture of the isomeric 4-bromopseudoceratidine (6) and 19-bromopseudoceratidine (7) was obtained along with one distinct fraction providing pure 7. Many attempts made to separate both 6 and 7 under different HPLC conditions were unsuccessful. The HRMS spectrum of the mixture of 6 and 7, as well as that of pure 7, displayed a protonated molecule cluster at m/z 721.7632/723.7587/725.7626/727.7581/729.7564/731.7520, with peaks showing relative intensities of 1:5:10:10:5:1. The [M+H]+ ion at m/z 721.7632 corresponded to the formula C17H2179Br5N5O2, with one more bromine atom and one fewer hydrogen atom than 1. The 1H NMR spectrum of 7 (Table 1) presented a singlet at δH 6.89 integrating to one 1H (H-4), indicating that one of the pyrrole moieties was substituted by three bromines. The HMBC spectrum of 7 showed couplings of H-4 with C-2 (δC 104.6), C-3 (δC 97.9, weak), C-5 (δC 128.3) and C-6 (δC 159.1), as well as between NH-7 (δH 8.14, br t, J = 5.6 Hz) and C-6 and C-8 (δC 38.0), which enabled us to establish to which of the two amides the dibrominated pyrrole moiety was attached. Because the H2-8 methylene protons (δH 3.21) showed HMBC couplings to C-9 (δC 26.5) and to C-10 (δC 23.3), whereas H2-11 (δH 2.89) showed couplings to C-10, C-9 and C-13 (δC 44.7), it was possible to determine the connectivity of the 2,3-dibromopyrrole-5-carboxylic acid group to NH-7 in compound 7. Additional HMBC couplings between NH-16 (δH 7.72) and C-17 (δC 162.0) and C-15 (δC 35.3), between H2-15 (δH 3.25) and C-14 (δC 26.5) and C-13, along with couplings observed between H2-13 (δH 2.86) and C-11, C-14 and C-15, confirmed the structure of 19-bromopseudoceratidine (7). Finally, MS/MS analysis of 7 provided further support for its structure (Figures S30 and S31, Supporting Information). Fragment ions detected at m/z 395.0079, 397.0097, 399.0098 (1:2:1) and at m/z 320.9235, 322.9219, 324.9187 (1:2:1) indicated that the dibromopyrrole-2-carboxylic acid group was attached to the four-methylene amine moiety of 7, whereas fragment ions observed at m/z 498.9012, 500.8963, 502.8913 (1:3:3:1), at m/z 472.9718, 474.9163, 476.9141, 478.9121 (1:3:3:1) and at m/z 384.8184, 386.8165, 388.8146, 390.8121 (1:3:3:1) indicated that the tribromopyrrole-2-carboxylic acid group was attached to the three-methylene amine moiety of 7, confirming its structure with no ambiguity.
The assignments of 1H and 13C NMR signals of 6 were also established by analysis of NMR data obtained for the 50/50 mixture of 6 and 7 (Tables 1 and 2). For compound 6, the singlet at δH 6.90 (H-19) showed couplings in the HMBC spectrum with C-17 (δC 159.4), C-18 (δC 128.3) and C-21 (δC 104.6). The amide NH-16 (δH 8.24, t, J = 5.6 Hz) showed couplings with C-17 and C-15 (δC 36.0), whereas CH2-15 (δH 3.29) showed couplings with C-17 (δC 159.4), C-14 (δC 26.2) and C-13 (δC 44.9) in the HMBC spectrum. In the COSY spectrum, H2-15 was coupled with NH-16 and H2-14 (δH 1.79), which was sequentially coupled with H2-13 (δH 2.90). The remaining four-methylene chain was shown to be attached to the NH-7/C-6 amide group. Complete assignments of 1H and 13C resonances of 6 and 7 (Tables 1 and 2) enabled the identification of these pentabrominated alkaloids.
The structure of 4,19-dibromopseudoceratidine (8) could be established by HRMS analysis, which showed a protonated molecule cluster at m/z 799.6352/801.6241/803.6213/805.6219/807.6194/809.6263/811.6205 with peaks showing relative intensities of 1:6:15:20:15:6:1. The [M+H]+ ion at m/z 799.6352 corresponded to the formula C17H2079Br6N5O2, with two more bromine atoms and two fewer hydrogen atoms than 1. Inspection of 1H NMR data obtained for 8 revealed that it corresponded to the 4,19-dibrominated version of 1, because no pyrrole hydrogen was detected, whereas the 1H signals of the spermidine chain remained very similar to the corresponding 1H signals in compounds 1–7. The same pattern was observed for the 13C NMR signals of 8 (Tables 1 and 2). Therefore, the structure of 8 was established as that of 4,19-dibromopseudoceratidine.
Isomeric tedamides A (9) and B (10) were isolated as an inseparable mixture and presented a protonated molecule cluster at m/z 611.9452/613.9453/615.9435/617.9399, with peaks showing relative intensities of 1:3:3:1. The [M+H]+ ion at m/z 611.9452 corresponded to the formula C18H2579Br3N5O4, with eight double-bond equivalents. A set of doubled signals in the 13C NMR spectrum (Table 4) indicated the presence of two closely related compounds. Several attempts to separate them by HPLC using different columns and/or solvent mixtures failed. Because the intensities of the 13C NMR signal pairs were not identical, we assumed a mixture of a slightly major isomer (10) and a minor one (9), in 55:45 relative ratio. The assignments of tedamide B isomer (10) were established as follows.
The β,γ-unsaturated lactam moiety in 10 was constructed by analysis of the HMBC spectrum. Correlations between NH-1 (δH 9.07) and C-2 (δC 167.1), C-3 (δC 92.1), C-4 (δC 144.5) and C-5 (δC 121.5), between H-4 (δH 7.30, d, J = 1.6 Hz) and C-2, C-3 and C-5, as well as between the methoxy group at δH 3.17 and C-3 accounted for either one of the two hypothetical lactam moieties, A or B (Figure 1). Fragment B was discarded because the coupling constant observed for H-4 (J = 1.6 Hz) agrees with a long-distance 1H-1H coupling rather than for a vicinal 1H-1H coupling between H-4 and NH-1. Moreover, analysis of the 1D NOESY spectrum of the mixture of 9 and 10 showed a strong NOE between H-4 and the methoxy group. The 13C signals of sp2 carbons of 9 and 10 were assigned to a 2,3-dibromopyrrole moiety by comparison with data for 1.8 1H and 13C NMR assignments of the spermidine chain were based on the higher intensity of the 13C NMR signals of 10, by analysis of COSY and HMBC spectra as well as by comparison with data for 1. Because 13C chemical shifts of the pyrrole conjugated amide carbons lie below δC 160, for tedamide B (10) C-6 was assigned at δC 165.6 and C-17 at δC 159.3. Couplings of NH-16 (δH 8.25) with C-17 and C-15 (δC 35.9) and of NH-7 (δH 8.28) with C-6 and C-8 (δC 38.7) confirmed such assignments (Tables 3 and 4). Analogous reasoning enabled the identification of tedamide A (9) as the minor isomer of 10.
Figure 1.

NOE observed in the 1D NOESY spectrum of tedamides A (9) and B (10) that supports the presence of fragment A instead of fragment B in the structures of 9 and 10.
Table 3.
1H NMR Data (δ, ppm) for Tedamides A–D (9–12) in DMSO-d6.
| Position | 9a (J in Hz) | 10a (J in Hz) | 11b (J in Hz) | 12b (J in Hz) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-H | 12.63, d (1.6) | 9.07, d (1.6) | n.o. | 9.07, br |
| 2 | ||||
| 3 | ||||
| 4 | 6.90, m | 7.30, d (1.6) | 7.29, s | |
| 5 | ||||
| 6 | ||||
| N-H | 8.14, t (5.7) | 8.28, m | 7.54, t (5.8) | 8.27, t (5.9) |
| 8 | 3.21, m | 3.08, m | 3.21, m | 3.10, m |
| 9 | 1.49, m | 1.46, m | 1.54, m | 1.48, m |
| 10 | 1.53, m | 1.57, m | 1.58, m | 1.54, m |
| 11 | 2.88, br | 2.88, m | 2.88, m | 2.88, m |
| N-H | n.o. | n.o. | n.o. | n.o. |
| 13 | 2.88, br | 2.88, m | 2.85, m | 2.85, m |
| 14 | 1.73, m | 1.78, m | 1.74, m | 1.77, m |
| 15 | 3.11, m | 3.26, m | 3.15, m | 3.26, m |
| N-H | 8.39, t (6.0) | 8.25, m | 8.39, t (5.9) | 7.71, t (6.0) |
| 17 | ||||
| 18 | ||||
| 19 | 7.34, d (1.7) | 6.90, m | 7.33, s | |
| 20 | ||||
| 21 | ||||
| N-H | 9.09, d (1.5) | 12.67, d (1.4) | 9.08, br | n.o. |
| O-CH3 | 3.18, s | 3.17, s | 3.17, s | 3.16, s |
400 MHz;
600 MHz;
n.o.: not observed
Tedamides C (11) and D (12) were also isolated as inseparable isomers in a ratio of approximately 28:72, presenting a protonated molecule cluster at m/z 689.8571/691.8551/693.8535/695.8514/697.8499 with peaks showing relative intensities of 1:4:6:4:1. The [M+H]+ ion at m/z 689.8571 corresponded to the formula C18H2479Br4N5O4, with one more bromine atom than tedamides A and B. Analysis of the NMR data of 11 and 12 indicated that the hydrogen at the pyrrole moiety was missing, whereas the remaining structures were essentially identical to those of compounds 9 and 10 (Tables 3 and 4). Thus, the structures of tedamides 11 and 12 were assigned as those corresponding to the tribrominated pyrrole derivatives of 9 and 10.
α-Bromo-α-alkoxyamides are known stable chemical entities, frequently utilized as functionalized substrates suitable for the preparation of further derivatives in medicinal chemistry.25–30 However, we have been unable to find β,γ-unsaturated-α-bromo-α-alkoxy lactams in the literature or any natural product bearing such functionalities in the SciFinder, Dictionary of Natural Products or MarinLit natural products databases. Thus, the 4-bromo-4-methoxy-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxamide moieties of tedamides A and B are structurally unprecedented. Although an artifactual origin could be in principle considered for tedamides given that MeOH was used in the extraction solvent, the mixture of compounds 9 and 10 displayed some optical activity ([α]D −7.75° (c 0.007, MeOH)), while the mixture of 11 and 12 displayed significant optical activity ([α]D +107.33° (c 0.0006, MeOH)). This provides evidence that these bromomethoxy acetals are not artifacts of oxidation during the isolation process but are likely products of an enzymatic oxidation.
The isolation of tri-, tetra-, penta- and hexabrominated pyrrole alkaloids from T. brasiliensis is noteworthy. Prior to the present investigation, the 3,4,5-tribromo-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid was the only alkaloid presenting a tri-bromo acylpyrrole isolated from a marine sponge, Axinella sp.31 Because several bromine-substituted pyrroles have been isolated from cultures of marine bacteria,32,33 it is possible that sponge polybrominated pyrrole alkaloids may have a bacterial origin. However, recent investigations have shown that vanadium-dependent bromoperoxidases isolated from marine algae promote bromination of a variety of pyrrole derivatives,34–36 including that of 1H-pyrrole-2-carboxamide and 1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate esters, which are commonly found in Agelasida and other marine sponges. Therefore, the distribution of brominated pyrroles in nature may not only be related to the diversity of bacteria associated with macroorganisms but possibly also to a widespread occurrence of bromoperoxidases in phylogenetically distant taxa. A recent metagenomic analysis of Tedania brasiliensis and other sponges presenting bromopyrrole alkaloids indicate that the biosynthesis of these compounds are related to the less abundant microbes in these sponges.37
Derivatization of pseudoceratidine and synthesis of pseudoceratidine derivatives
Aiming to evaluate structure-activity relationships of pseudoceratidine and congeners in anti-parasitic assays, a series of 23 pseudoceratidine derivatives were synthesized. Natural pseudoceratidine was acetylated with Ac2O in pyridine to obtain its N12-acetyl derivative (2). After HPLC purification of the acetylated product, we obtained both N12-acetyl pseudoceratidine (2) and N12-formyl pseudoceratidine (3). Compound 3 is likely derived from reaction of pseudoceratidine with acetic formic anhydride resulting from the reaction of Ac2O and residual formic acid from the HPLC solvent used to purify pseudoceratidine. Compounds 2 and 3 were fully characterized by HRMS, 1H, 13C, HSQC and HMBC spectra (Supporting Information).
In order to prepare additional pseudoceratidine derivatives in sufficient amounts for testing in several antiparasitic assays, the natural product was first synthesized based on a previously reported procedure.10,11 Commercially available 2,2,2-trichloro-1-(1H-pyrrol-2-yl)ethenone (13) was brominated with Br2 to give the known di-brominated pyrrole (14)38 in 87% yield. Coupling of 14 with spermidine (15) in THF provided synthetic pseudoceratidine in 72% yield (Scheme 1). N-Methyl-pseudoceratidine (16) was then prepared by reductive amination with formaldehyde in 70% yield to probe the importance of the basic secondary amine as a proton donor or acceptor, or both. Toward a derivative (17) amenable to further coupling with a fluorophore via Sharpless-Hüisgen cycloaddition, pseudoceratidine (1) was coupled to 2-azidoacetic acid in 72% yield (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1.
Syntheses of pseudoceratidine derivatives with variations in the tether.
A series of derivatives with different chains between the two pyrrole moieties were also synthesized to probe the importance of the chain length and the requirement of basic amines (Scheme 1). Compounds 20 and 21 were prepared using the same conditions for preparation of 1 employing 1,5-diaminopentane or 1,8-diaminooctane, in 50% and 74% yield from 14, respectively. Pseudoceratidine derivatives 23 and 25 were prepared using similar conditions with spermine (22) and N1-(6-aminohexyl)hexane-1,6-diamine (23), in 60% and 68% yield respectively. An additional variation introduced into the polyamine chain was introduction of a sulfur atom into the chain through synthesis of dialkyl sulfide 27 from 2-(2-aminoethylthio)ethanamine (26) and ketone 14 in a microwave reactor in 38% yield.
We also investigated changes in substituents on the pyrrole moieties while keeping the spermidine linker unchanged, with the exception of a non-brominated derivative of 20, namely 28, prepared in 60% yield by coupling of pyrrole ketone 13 and 1,5-diaminopentane (18). The spermidine derived non-brominated variant 29 was obtained in a similar manner in 70% yield. Monobromination of 13 at C-4 to provide 30 in 44% yield was achieved with 1-chloromethyl-4-fluor-1,4-diazoniabicyclo[2.2.2]octane bis(tetrafluoroborate) (Selectfluor or F-TEDA-BF4) in the presence of KBr.39 Reaction of 30 with spermidine (15) under the same conditions for the synthesis of pseudoceratidine gave 2,21-debromopseudoceratidine (31) in 65% yield. Chlorination of 13 with sulfuryl chloride provided 2,2,2-trichloro-1-(4,5-dichloro-1H-pyrrol-2-yl)ethenone (32) in 15% yield. Coupling of 32 with spermidine led to the chlorinated version of pseudoceratidine (33) in 38% yield. Monofluorination at C-5 of 13 was achieved with Selectfluor in a microwave reactor at 70 °C to provide 34 in 20% yield.40 Coupling of 34 with spermidine under basic conditions gave 35 in 65% yield.
More substantial changes in the aromatic moieties of pseudoceratidine were also introduced. Coupling of indol-2-carboxylic acid (36) and 1H-benzo[d]imidazole-2-carboxylic acid (37) with spermidine gave derivatives 38 and 39 in moderate yields. Coupling with 5-bromothiophene-2-carboxylic acid (40) and 5-methylthiophene-2-carboxylic acid (41) gave 42 and 43 in low yield. Reaction of 6-chloropyridine-2-carboxylic acid (44) or 6-methylpyridine-2-carboxylic acid (45) with spermidine provided the pyridine derivatives 46 and 47 also in low yield. Finally, the coupling of furan derivatives 48 and 49 with spermidine enabled us to obtain bis-furans 50 and 51 in moderate yields.
Anti-parasitic Activity and SAR Investigation of Pseudoceratidine and Derivatives
Pseudoceratidine (1) was assayed against four protozoan parasite species: P. falciparum, Leishmania (L.) amazonensis (etiological agent of localized and diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis in South America), L. (L.) infantum (causative agent of visceral leishmaniasis in the Mediterranean and in Latin America) and Trypanosoma cruzi. Although 1 was essentially inactive against L. (L.) amazonensis, L. (L.) infantum and T. cruzi, it showed very good antiplasmodial activity (1.1 ± 0.1 μM) against P. falciparum (Table 5). The inseparable mixture of structural isomers 3-debromopseudoceratidine (4) and 20-debromopseudoceratidine (5) showed five-fold decreased anti-parasitic activity on P. falciparum (5.8 ± 0.5 μM), while N-acetyl-pseudoceratidine (2) did not display any anti-parasitic activity. The isomeric pair of tedamides A (9) and B (10) was also inactive as anti-parasitic agents. The preparation of pseudoceratidine derivatives 2, 16, 17, 20, 21, 23, 25, 27 – 29, 31, 33, 35, 38, 39, 42, 43, 46, 47, 50 and 51 in adequate amounts enabled us to explore the impact on bioactivity through variation of the pseudoceratidine polyamine chain and aromatic end groups. N-Methyl-pseudoceratidine (16) showed good anti-plasmodial activity against P. falciparum (4 ±1 μM). Compound 23, with a larger polyamine chain bearing two basic nitrogens, showed anti-plasmodial activity similar to that of the natural product (1.9 ± 1.2 μM), while compound 25, with a polyamine chain of similar length but with only one basic nitrogen, displayed a two-fold decrease in anti-plasmodial activity (2 ± 1 μM). The 2,21-debromopseudoceratidine (31) derivative showed a decrease in anti-plasmodial activity (7 ± 1 μM) relative to the pseudoceratidine (1). Finally, the furan derivative 51 bearing four bromine atoms also showed good anti-plasmodial activity against P. falciparum (3 ± 1 μM).
Table 5.
Antileishmanial, Anti-T. cruzi, Anti-Plasmodial and Cytotoxicity Activities of Pseudoceratidine Derivatives.
|
|
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L. infantum promastigotes | L. amazonensis promastigotes | T. cruzi epimastigotes | Bone marrow-derived macrophages | P. falciparum (3D7) | HepG2 | ||
|
| |||||||
| Compd. | EC50+/−S.D. (μM) | EC50+/−S.D. (μM) | EC50+/−S.D. (μM) | CC50+/−S.D. (μM) | EC50+/−S.D. (μM) | MDL50+/−S.D. (μM) | Selectivity Indexa |
| 1 | >100 | >100 | > 100 | - | 1.1 ± 0.1 (0.96 – 1.24) |
16 ± 1 (14.6 – 17.4) |
15 |
| 2 | >100 | >100 | >100 | - | > 10 | - | - |
| 4+5 | >100 | >100 | >100 | - | 5.8 ± 0.5 (5.11 – 6.49) |
≥400 | ≥69 |
| 9+10 | >100 | >100 | > 100 | - | > 100 | - | - |
| 16 | >100 | >100 | > 100 | - | 4 ± 1 (3 – 6) |
160 ± 23 (128 – 192) |
35 |
| 17 | >100 | >100 | > 50 | - | > 10 | - | - |
| 20 | 24 ± 3 (20 – 27) |
19 ± 1 (18 – 20) |
7 ± 1 (5 – 7) |
52 ± 3 (49 – 55) |
> 10 | - | - |
| 21 | >100 | >100 | > 100 | - | > 10 | - | - |
| 23 | 19 ± 1 (17 – 20) |
44 ± 5 (38 – 49) |
> 100 | > 100 | 2 ± 1 (0.20 – 3) |
99 ± 12 (82 – 116) |
52 |
| 25 | >100 | >100 | > 100 | - | 2 ± 1 (2 – 3) |
263 ± 43 (203 – 323) |
101 |
| 27 | 24 ± 3 (21 – 28) |
43 ± 2 (41 – 45) |
24 ± 4 (21 – 27) |
66 ± 5 (61 – 72) |
> 10 | - | - |
| 28 | >100 | >100 | > 50 | - | > 10 | - | - |
| 29 | >100 | >100 | > 100 | - | > 10 | - | - |
| 31 | >100 | >100 | > 100 | - | 7 ± 1 (6 – 8) |
≥400 | ≥54 |
| 33 | >100 | >100 | > 100 | - | > 10 | - | - |
| 35 | >100 | >100 | > 100 | - | > 10 | - | - |
| 38 | >100 | >100 | > 100 | - | > 10 | - | - |
| 39 | >100 | >100 | > 100 | - | > 10 | - | - |
| 42 | 20 ± 3 (17 – 24) |
76 ± 2 (72 – 80) |
> 100 | > 100 | > 10 | - | - |
| 43 | >100 | >100 | > 100 | - | > 10 | - | - |
| 46 | >100 | >100 | > 100 | - | > 10 | - | - |
| 47 | >100 | >100 | > 100 | - | > 10 | - | - |
| 50 | 23 ± 5 (17 – 28) |
18 ± 2 (16 – 19) |
> 100 | 82 ± 4 (78 – 87) |
3 ± 1 (2 – 4) |
≥400 | ≥125 |
| 51 | >100 | >100 | > 100 | - | > 10 | - | - |
EC50: half maximal effective concentration; CC50: half maximal cytotoxic concentration; S.D.: standard deviation; 95% confidence interval values are shown in parentheses; -: not determined;
Selectivity index: MDL50/IC50 for P. falciparum.
Although pseudoceratidine (1) was inactive against L. (L.) infantum promastigotes, derivatives 20, 23, 27, 42 and 50 showed enhanced, but yet moderate and similar, antileishmanial activity (EC50s ~ 20 μM). The same derivatives were active, but considerably less potent, against L. (L.) amazonensis. Only compound 20 showed good anti-parasitic activity against T. cruzi epimastigotes, while compound 27 showed weak activity in the same bioassay.
Leishmania and Trypanosoma species are Euglenozoa kinetoplastida parasites, while Plasmodium falciparum belongs to Haemosporida within the phylum Apicomplexa.41 Constituting two groups of phylogenetically distant parasites, not surprisingly compounds affecting these two groups of organisms may show distinct effects. Our results indicated a selective, more potent activity, against P. falciparum for compounds 1, 4 and 5, 16, 23, 25, 31 and 50 (Table 5 and Figure 2). It is evident the importance of bromine substituents in the aromatic extremities of pseudoceratidine derivatives for the anti-plasmodial activity. Fully debrominated pseudoceratidine (29) is completely inactive, as well as the chlorinated derivative 33 and fluorinated 35. Although methyl groups represent a structural variation similar to bromine groups in terms of van der Waals radii,42 the bis-methylated bis-furan pseudoceratidine derivative 51 is completely inactive as well. Thus, bromination in both pyrrole and furan pseudoceratidine derivatives is essential for the expression of anti-plasmodial activity against P. falciparum, which seems to be related to the electronic effect of bromine on aromatic rings rather than to its van der Waals radius or to an enhanced lipophilic character promoted by the bromine substituents.43 The nature of the polyamine chain is an additional structural characteristic which determines the anti-plasmodial activity of pseudoceratidine derivatives. Compounds 20 and 21 which are devoid of a basic nitrogen, but have similar chain length (e.g., 21) when compared to 1, are inactive as anti-plasmodial agents. The sulfur bearing derivative 27 is inactive as well. On the other hand, compounds 23 and 25, with longer polyamine chains, are as active as pseudoceratidine (1). The N-methyl derivative (16) is still active, but approximately four-fold less active than pseudoceratidine. Therefore, a basic linker in the form of the polyamine chain appears important for anti-plasmodial activity.
Figure 2.
Structures and anti-plasmodial activities of pseudoceratidine derivatives against Plasmodium falciparum.
Derivatives with an N-acyl group (2 and 17) are inactive against P. falciparum, suggesting the importance of the basic nitrogens in the polyamine chain. These compounds were also inactive against Leishmania species and T. cruzi tested in our assays, which prevents simple acylation of pseudoceratidine to access cellular probes. However, alkylation of pseudoceratidine derivatives, was tolerated since they maintain the basic nitrogen atom. The selectivity index of the anti-plasmodial activity of compounds 1, 4, 5, 16, 23, 25, 31 and 50 was determined by measuring cytotoxicity on the human liver cancer HepG2 cell line (Table 5). Pseudoceratidine (1) was the most cytotoxic compound (16 ± 1 μM), but with a selectivity index of 15. Compounds 16, 4, 5, 23, 25, 31 and 50 displayed overall weak cytotoxicity, with selectivity indices between 35–125, which are considered excellent as this shows dramatically reduced toxicity to healthy cells.
As for the anti-Leishmanial activity, compounds 20, 23, 27, 42 and 50 are moderate to weakly active (EC50 in the range between 19 and 24 μM; Figure 3). However, a clear picture on the structural requirements for anti-Leishmanial activity of these pseudoceratidine derivatives did not emerge. Compounds 20 and 27 have shorter polyamine chains devoid of a basic nitrogen, but the opposite is true for compounds 23, 42 and 50. Bromination seems to be important, but the nature of the aromatic ring is apparently less relevant for the anti-leishmanial activity. Therefore, further variations on this series of anti-leishmanial compounds need to be explored in order to clarify structure-activity relationships aiming to improve the effectiveness of toxicity toward Leishmania (L.) infantum promastigotes.
Figure 3.
Structures and anti-leishmanial activities of pseudoceratidine derivatives against Leishmania (L.) infantum.
In vitro infections were performed aiming to evaluate the activity of compounds 23, 42 and 50 against Leishmania intracelular amastigotes. Because amastigotes must reside inside macrophages, we first determined the cytotoxicity of active pseudoceratidine derivatives against bone marrow derived macrophages from BALB/c mice. Compounds 23 and 42 showed low toxicity (CC50 > 100 μM). The half maximal cytotoxic concentration for compound 50 was 83 ± 4 μM. Compounds 23, 42 and 50 were selected for further investigation of their activities on intracellular amastigotes. Bone marrow derived macrophages were infected with L. (L.). amazonensis stationary phase promastigotes (MOI = 10) for 24 h and then incubated with increasing concentrations of compounds 23, 42 and 50 for subsequent counting of intracellular amastigotes. Intracellular parasitism was reduced in a dose-dependent manner after 24 h for 23, 42 and 50 (Figure 4), leading to approximately 80% reduction of the amastigote number over the control group at higher concentrations. The intracellular effect against Leishmania amastigotes was almost equivalent when comparing compounds 23, 42 and 50. Further studies should evaluate the effects of compounds 23, 42 and 50 in experimental leishmaniasis.
Figure 4.
In vitro activity of 23, 42 and 50 against intracellular L. (L.) amazonensis amastigotes. Macrophages derived from BALB/c mice bone marrow were infected with L. (L.) amazonensis stationary promastigotes for 1 h (MOI = 10). After 24 h, infected cells were incubated with 6.125, 25, 50 or 100 μM of each compound for 24 h. MeOH-fixed cells were stained and infection was determined by counting 300 cells/coverslip. Experiments were performed in triplicate. The results shown are representative of two independent experiments. A. Bars indicate the number of intracellular amastigotes. Numbers above each bar indicate the percentage of reduction over control untreated infected macrophages. (B) Photomicrograph examples showing untreated infected macrophages (a) and infected macrophages incubated with compound 42 at 100 μM (b). Arrows point to intracellular amastigotes. Bar = 10 μm.
In order to better characterize the anti-plasmodial activity of pseudoceratidine (1), the most active compound against P. falciparum, its impact on the morphology of HepG2 cells was evaluated after 24 h of parasites treatment at a concentration 10-fold higher than its IC50 value on the parasites. Pseudoceratidine (1) was not toxic for HepG2 cells at this high concentration as HepG2 cells showed microscopic morphology similar to untreated cells. Pseudoceratidine (1) was then tested against multi-resistant P. falciparum strain (K1 strain), and still presented very good potency against this K1 resistant strain, with an IC50 value of 1.1 ± 0.1 μM (Figure 5 and Table 6).
Figure 5.
HepG2 cells morphology before (left) and after (right) treatment with pseudoceratidine (1) at 10 μM.
Table 6.
Antiplasmodial Activities of Pseudoceratidine (1) and Standard Antimalarials Against Sensitive (3D7 strain) and Resistant P. falciparum (K1 strain).
| Compound | P. falciparum IC50 (μM) | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| 3d7 strain | K1 strain | |
| Pseudoceratidine (1) | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 |
| Chloroquine | 0.013 ± 0.002 | 0.167 ± 0.002 |
| Pyrimethamine | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 3.9 ± 0.1 |
| Cycloguanil | 0.010 ± 0.002 | 0.54 ± 0.02 |
| Artesunate | 0.004 ± 0.001 | 0.003 ± 0.001 |
Aiming to assess the stage-specific inhibitory activity of pseudoceratidine (1), it was incubated at a concentration 10-fold higher than IC50 values with highly-synchronized parasites. Cell morphological changes were observed by microscopy at 0 h, 8 h, 16 h and 32 h post-synchronization (Figure 6). Pseudoceratidine (1) showed inhibitory activity in the early ring stages, inducing alterations in P. falciparum morphology between 8 h and 16 h after incubation. These data suggest a fast-acting mechanism in which young forms of P. falciparum in the intraerythrocytic cycle are highly susceptible to the anti-parasitic activity of 1. The potential drug interactions of pseudoceratidine (1) with sodium artesunate against P. falciparum were also assayed, in order to elucidate potential benefits and limitations of candidate molecules in combination with antimalarial drugs.44 The isobologram analysis and FIC index (1.0 ± 0.2) indicate an additive interaction effect of pseudoceratidine (1) in combination with artesunate, thereby suggesting that pseudoceratidine derivatives may be used in artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) (Figure 7).
Figure 6.

Microscopy of synchronized parasites continuously treated with pseudoceratidine (1) at concentration 10-fold the IC50 value (top line) and DMSO (control, bottom line). Images are representative of three independent experiments.
Figure 7.

Isobologram plot for drug interaction analysis of pseudoceratidine (1) and sodium artesunate.
Bromopyrrole alkaloids related to oroidin have been assayed against a series of parasites. Dispacamide B, spongiacidin B and dibromopalau’amine displayed anti-plasmodial activity against P. falciparum comparable to that of pseudoceratidine (1.34, 1.09 and 1.48 mg/mL, respectively).45 Dibromopalau’amine was also very active against T. brucei rhodesiense (0.46 μg/mL) and against Leishmania donovani (1.48 μg/mL). Longamide B also showed good anti-parasitic activity against T. brucei rhodesiense (1.53 μg/mL) and against L. donovani (3.85 μg/mL).45 Oroidin showed good anti-parasitic activity against P. falciparum (3.9 μg/mL) and moderate activity against T. brucei rhodesiense (17.3 μg/mL) being inactive against Leishmania donovani and T. cruzi.46 Simpler derivatives 4,5-dibromo-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid and the respective methyl ester showed better anti-plasmodial activity (5.8 and 7.9 μg/mL, respectively).46 It is clear that a detailed investigation of bromopyrrole alkaloids as anti-parasitic agents, particularly as anti-plasmodial compounds, is a worthy area for further research.
Conclusion
In the present investigation, we report the isolation of eight new pseudoceratidine derivatives from the sponge Tedania brasiliensis, of which the tedamides encompass a new 4-bromo-4-methoxy-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxamide moiety. Pseudoceratidine displayed very good antimalarial activity, and justified the preparation of 23 of its derivatives aiming to establish initial structure-activity relationships. Pseudoceratidine and seven synthetic derivatives indicated that the length of the polyamine chain bearing a basic nitrogen, as well as the presence of bromine atoms on pyrrole or furan terminal moieties, represent essential structural features for the expression of anti-plasmodial activity. Pseudoceratidine (1) showed antiplasmodial activity against both sensitive (3D7 strain) and resistant (K1 strain) P. falciparum strains, and also an additive interaction effect in combination with artesunate, indicating that derivatives of 1 may be used in combination with artemisinin for the treatment of malaria. The results described demonstrate that the pseudoceratidine scaffold, which is easily obtained by total synthesis, constitutes a useful lead to be developed as potential anti-plasmodial agents.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
General Experimental Procedures
UV spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-3600 spectrophotometer. IR spectra were obtained on a Shimadzu IRAffinity-1 Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer on a silica plate. NMR spectra were obtained at 25 ºC, with TMS as an internal standard, using a Bruker ARX 9.4 Tesla spectrometer operating at either 400.35 MHz (1H) or 100.10 MHz (13C) and a Bruker AV-600 spectrometer operating at either 600 MHz (1H) or 150 MHz (13C) with a 2.5 mm cryoprobe. The 1H chemical shifts are referenced to the residual DMSO-d6 (δ2.49), whereas 13C chemical shifts are referenced to the DMSO-d6 solvent peaks (δ39.5). HRMS and direct insertion MS/MS analyses were performed on a Waters Xevo QTOF MS/MS instrument using the following conditions: capillary voltage, 1.20 kV; desolvation temperature, 450 ºC; voltage cone, 30 V; electrospray, positive mode; detection range, 100–1000 Da with total ion count extracting acquisition. Cone and desolvation gas flows were set to 700 L h−1, respectively, with a nitrogen source. HPLC semi-preparative and preparative separations were performed with a Waters instrument (600 quaternary pump and 2487 double-beam UV detector), with 0.1% formic acid in all eluents utilized. HPLC-UV-ELSD-MS analyses were performed using a Waters Alliance 2695 instrument coupled on-line with a Waters 2996 photodiode array detector and a Waters 2424 evaporative light scattering detector, followed by a Micromass ZQ 2000 detector with an electrospray interface. The mass spectrometer detector was optimized using the following conditions: capillary voltage, 3.00 kV; source block temperature, 100 ºC; desolvation temperature, 350ºC; voltage cone, 25 V; electrospray, positive mode; detection range, 200–900 Da with total ion count extracting acquisition. Cone and desolvation gas flows were set to 50 and 350 L h−1, respectively, with a nitrogen source.
Animal Material
The sponge Tedania brasiliensis was collected at Cabo Frio (Rio de Janeiro state, in April 2011) and identified by one of the authors (E.H.). A voucher of the collected sponge has been deposited at the Museu Nacional do Rio de Janeiro, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (MNRJ 16876).
Extraction and Isolation
A 136.2 g freeze-dried sample of T. brasiliensis was homogenized and exhaustively extracted with 5 L of MeOH. The solvent was evaporated to 500 mL. The resulting MeOH extract was diluted with 50 mL of H2O and partitioned with hexane (3 × 500 mL). The MeOH/H2O fraction was evaporated to dryness and dissolved in 1 L of 1:1 EtOAc/H2O. Partitioning was performed two additional times. The EtOAc fraction was evaporated to dryness to yield 5.37 g. The hexane extract was also evaporated to dryness to yield 1.79 g of an apolar fraction. The aqueous fraction of the EtOAc/H2O partition was extracted with a 1:1 mixture of XAD-4 and XAD-7, after which the resins were desorbed with MeOH, then with 1:1 MeOH/acetone, and the organic solvents were evaporated to dryness. Anti-parasitic assays performed with the hexanes, EtOAc and resin-extracted H2O fraction indicated bioactivity exclusively in the EtOAc fraction. HPLC-UV-MS analysis of these three fractions indicated pseudoceratidine (1) and its minor derivatives only in the EtOAc fraction as well. Therefore, neither the hexanes nor resin-extracted H2O fractions were investigated.
The EtOAc fraction (5.37 g) was subjected to solid-phase extraction on a C18 reversed-phase cartridge (Waters) eluted with a gradient of MeOH in H2O. After their evaporation and TLC analysis, the fractions obtained were pooled into eight fractions named TBA1 (608 mg), TBA2 (567 mg), TBA3 (347 mg), TBA4 (377 mg), TBA5 (251 mg), TBA6 (383 mg), TBA7 (338 mg) and TBA8 (399 mg). Fraction TBA2 was separated by HPLC using an Inertsil ODS-2 column (250 × 9.4 mm, 5 μm), with a H2O/MeCN ratio of 75:25, a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min and detection performed at λmax 254 nm. Six fractions were obtained, among which fraction TBA2B (42.1 mg) was further investigated and fraction TBA2F (28.1 mg) was identified as 4,5-dibromo-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid. Fraction TBA2B was separated by HPLC using an Inertsil ODS-2 column (250 × 9.4 mm, 5 μm), with a H2O/MeCN ratio of 67:33, a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min and detection performed at λmax 254 nm. Seven fractions were obtained, among which fraction TBA2B3 (9.4 mg) was identified as a mixture of tedamides A (9) and B (10), fraction TBA2B5 (1.3 mg) was identified as 3-debromopseudoceratidine (4) and 20-debromopseudoceratidine (5) and fraction TBA2B7 (10.2 mg) was identified as pseudoceratidine (1).8
HPLC separation of the fraction TBA3 using an Inertsil ODS-2 column (250 × 9.4 mm, 5 μm), with a gradient of MeOH in H2O from 40% MeOH to 100% MeOH over 45 min (flow rate of 1.5 mL/min and detection at λmax 254 nm), yielded six fractions, among which fraction TBA3-4 (71.8 mg) was identified as pure pseudoceratidine (1) and fractions TBA3-3 (17.0 mg), TBA3-5 (13.3 mg) and TBA3-6 (4.3 mg) were further investigated. Fraction TBA3-3 was separated using an Inertsil ODS-3 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm), with a gradient of MeOH in H2O from 38% MeOH to 60% MeOH over 38 min (flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and detection at λmax 254 nm), to yield six fractions, among which TBA3-3C (2.3 mg) was identified as a mixture of tedamides C (11) and D (12). Fraction TBA3-5 (13.3 mg) was separated by HPLC using an Inertsil ODS-3 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm), with a gradient of MeOH in H2O from 10% MeOH to 100% MeOH over 35 min (flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and detection at λmax 254 nm), to yield four fractions, among which fraction TBA3-5B (2.7 mg) was further purified using an Inertsil ODS-3 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm), with a gradient of MeOH in H2O from 55% MeOH to 60% MeOH over 30 min (flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and detection at λmax 254 nm), to yield pure 19-bromopseudoceratidine (7) (1.0 mg). Fraction TBA3-6 (4.3 mg) was purified by HPLC using an Inertsil ODS-3 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm), with a gradient of MeOH in H2O from 10% MeOH to 100% MeOH over 35 min (flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and detection at λmax 254 nm), to yield 0.5 mg of 4,19-dibromopseudoceratidine (8).
Separation of fraction TBA-5 (250.5 mg) by HPLC using an Inertsil ODS-2 column (250 × 9.4 mm, 5 μm) and a gradient of 1:1 MeOH/MeCN in H2O, from 44% to 100% of the organic mixture over 30 min, yielded seven fractions, among which TBA-5D (80.7 mg) was identified as pure pseudoceratidine (1).
Separation of the fraction TBA-7 (338 mg) by HPLC using an Inertsil ODS-2 column (250 × 9.4 mm, 5 μm), with a gradient of MeOH/MeCN (1:1) in H2O from 44% MeOH to 100% MeOH/MeCN (1:1) over 35 min (flow rate of 1.5 mL/min and detection at λmax 254 nm), yielded fraction TBA-7A (98.2 mg). This fraction was further separated by HPLC using an Inertsil ODS-3 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm), with a gradient of MeOH/MeCN (1:1) in H2O from 30% to 100% MeOH/MeCN (1:1) over 30 min (flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and detection at λmax 254 nm), to yield ten fractions, among which TBA-7A8 (5.0 mg) was identified as a mixture of 4-bromopseudoceratidine (6) and 19-debromopseudoceratidine (7).
3-Debromopseudoceratidine (4) and 20-debromopseudoceratidine (5): colorless glassy solid; UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 215 (4.2), 235 (4.2), 274 (4.6) nm; IR (film) νmax 3186, 2945, 1677, 1629, 1133, 740, and 615 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data, Tables 1 and 2; HRESIMS: m/z 565.9409 [M+H]+ (calcd for C17H2379Br3N5O2, 565.9402).
4-Bromopseudoceratidine (6) and 19-bromopseudoceratidine (7): colorless glassy solid; UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 215 (4.2), 235 (4.2), 277 (4.6) nm; 1H and 13C NMR data, Tables 1 and 2; HRESIMS: m/z 721.7632 [M+H]+ (calcd for C17H2179Br5N5O2, 721.7612).
4,19-Dibromopseudoceratidine (8): glassy solid; UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 222 (4.2), 235 (4.2), 274 (4.6) nm; 1H and 13C NMR data, Tables 1 and 2; HRESIMS: m/z 799.6749 [M+H]+ (calcd for C17H2079Br6N5O2, 799.6717).
Tedamide A (9) and tedamide B (10): colorless glassy solid; [α]D −7.75° (c 0.007, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 218 (4.2), 275 (4.2) nm; IR (film) νmax 3103, 2938, 2842, 1718, 1677, 1526, 1202, 1139, and 719 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data, Tables 3 and 4; HRESIMS: m/z 611.9452 [M+H]+ (calcd for C18H2579Br3N5O4, 611.9456).
Tedamide C (11) and tedamide D (12): colorless glassy solid; [α]D +107.33° (c 0.0006, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 218 (4.2), 275 (4.2) nm; 1H and 13C NMR data, Tables 3 and 4; HRESIMS: m/z 689.8571 [M+H]+ (calcd for C18H2479Br4N5O4, 689.8562).
Preparation of N12-Acetylpseudoceratidine (2) and N12-Formylpseudoceratidine (3)
Pseudoceratidine (1, 5.0 mg, 7.7 mM) was dissolved in freshly distilled pyridine (1 mL) and acetic anhydride (1 mL, 10.6 mM) was added. The reaction was left under magnetic stirring for 60 h, after which the pyridine/Ac2O mixture was evaporated in vacuo. The reaction mixture was purified by HPLC using an Inertsil ODS-3 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm), with 65% MeOH, a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and detection performed at λmax 254 nm. N12-Acetylpseudoceratidine (2) (2.7 mg) and N12-formylpseudoceratidine (3) (1.4 mg) were obtained in 50.7% and 26.9% yields, respectively.
N12-Acetylpseudoceratidine (2): colorless glassy solid; UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 222 (4.2), 235 (4.2), 275 (4.6) nm; IR (film) νmax 2924, 2842, 1608, 1560, 1526, and 664 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data, Tables 1 and 2; HRESIMS: m/z 683.8433 [M-H]− (calcd for C19H2279Br4N5O3, 683.8456).
N12-Formylpseudoceratidine (3): colorless glassy solid; UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 222 (4.2), 235 (4.2), 275 (4.6) nm; IR (film) νmax 2924, 2842, 1587, 1360, and 650 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data, Tables 1 and 2; HRESIMS: m/z 669.8283 [M-H]− (calcd. for C18H2279Br4N5O3, 671.8299).
Bioassay procedures
Chemical Compounds
Alamar blue (resazurin), DMSO and MeOH, M-199 medium, RPMI-1640, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), sodium azide (99.5% purity), bacterial lipopolyscchacaride (99% purity) and TritonX-100 (99% purity), benznidazole (97% purity) were purchased from commercial suppliers.
Anti-Leishmanial and Anti-Trypanosoma cruzi in vitro Assays
Leishmania (L.) amazonensis (MHOM/BR/1973/M2269) promastigotes were maintained at 26 °C in Medium 199 (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 5% penicillin/streptomycin, 0.1% hemin (25 mg/mL in 50% triethanolamine), 20% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 10 mM adenine (pH 7.5), and 5 mM L-glutamine.47 Leishmania (L.) infantum (MHOM/BR/1972/LD) was cultured as described above, with the exception that 5% human sterile urine was added to the culture medium. Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigotes (Y strain) were grown in liver infusion tryptose (LIT) medium supplemented with 20 mg/L hemin and 10% fetal calf serum at 28 °C as previously described.48 The anti-parasitic activity of pseudoceratidine derivatives was assessed against trypanosomatids, using a MTT viability assay49 after 24 h incubation with the series of pseudoceratidine derivatives. The half maximal effective concentration (EC50) values for the Leishmania spp. and T. cruzi populations were calculated from sigmoidal regression of the concentration-response curves using Scientific Graphing and Analysis Software Origin 5.0. Each experiment was performed in triplicate and repeated two or three times. Cytotoxic experiments were conducted using bone marrow macrophages from BALB/c female mice. Differentiated cells were cultured in 96 well plates at 37 °C for posterior incubation with increasing concentrations of pseudoceratidine derivatives for 24 h. The MTT method was also performed and CC50 values were calculated accordingly.49
Intracellular infections were obtained by infecting bone marrow derived macrophages with stationary phase L. (L.) amazonensis promastigotes (10 parasites: 1 macrophage; MOI = 10). After 1 h of incubation with the parasites, cultures were washed three times with PBS 1X and maintained at 33 °C, 5% CO2, for 24 h. After this period, infections were established and different concentrations of pseudoceratidine compounds were added to the cultures that remained at 33 °C for 24 h. Cells were then washed three times with warm PBS 1X and fixed with MeOH for subsequent staining using Instant Prov kit (Newprov). The number of intracellular amastigotes was obtained by counting 300 cells in triplicate coverslips. Photomicrographs of infections were recorded using the microscope system Leica LAS Core. Experiments using BALB/c mice were approved by the Ethical Committee for Animal Experimentation of the Biology Institute of the State University of Campinas – UNICAMP (4535-1/2017).
Anti-Plasmodial in vitro Assays Against P. falciparum Blood Parasites
Plasmodium falciparum blood parasites [3D7, sensitive strain; K1, chloroquine, cycloguanil and pyrimethamine resistant strain] were cultured as previously described.50 Freshly sorbitol synchronized ring stages51 were incubated with the test samples at various concentrations, previously solubilized in 0.05% DMSO (v/v). Each assay was performed in triplicate. Results were compared with control cultures in complete medium with no assay samples. Pyrimethamine, chloroquine, cycloguanil and sodium artesunate were used in each experiment as antimalarial controls. The activity of test samples was measured using the SYBR green assay.52 Briefly, the plates were centrifuged at 700g for 5 min at room temperature to remove the medium, washed with 1X PBS and incubated for 30 min with lysis buffer solution [2.4228 g TRIS, ultra-pure (for 20 mM solution), pH 7.5; 1.8612 g of EDTA 5 mM ultrapure (for 5 mM solution); 80 μg saponin (0.008% w/v); 800 μL of Triton X-100 (0.08% v/v); H2O Type I] and SYBR green I DNA stain (1: 20000). The fluorescence of uninfected erythrocytes was considered as a background. Fluorescence was measured on a SpectraMax340PC384 fluorimeter at 485/535 nm. The half-maximal compound inhibitory concentration (IC50) was estimated by curve fitting using software from the OriginLab Corporation and comparing to the parasite growth in test sample-free medium.
Cytotoxicity Tests Using Immortalized Cells
The cytotoxicity of test compounds was evaluated in a human hepatoma cell line (HepG2) using cells cultured in 75 cm2 sterile flasks containing RPMI-1640 medium (supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum and 40 mg/L gentamicin) under a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 ºC. When confluent, the cell monolayer was washed with culture medium, trypsinized, distributed in a flat-bottomed 96-well plate (5 × 103 cells/well) and incubated for 18 h at 37 ºC for cell adherence.53 The compounds (in 20 μL solution) at various concentrations (1,000-1 μg/mL) were placed in 96-well plates and incubated with the cultured cells for 24 h under a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C. Then, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) solution (5 mg/mL; 20 μL/well for 3 h) was used to evaluate the mitochondrial viability. The supernatants were carefully removed and 100 μL DMSO was added to each well and mixed to solubilize the formazan crystals. The optical density was determined at 570 nm and 630 nm. The cell viability was expressed as the percentage of the control absorbance in the untreated cells after subtracting the appropriate background.
In vitro Association with Artesunate
The isobologram was built to analyze the effects of drug combination aiming to determining the additive, synergic or antagonistic effect. Briefly, the fractional half maximum inhibitory concentration (FIC50) was calculated for each drug pair combination. A stock drug solution was prepared for each drug using complete media, such that the final concentration approximates IC50 following 3–4 twofold dilutions. Using these stocks solutions, the following volume-volume (v/v) mixtures of artesunate and pseudoceratidine (1) were prepared in 0:5, 1:4, 2:3, 1:4 and 5:0 ratios. These mixtures were two-fold serially diluted to generate a range of seven concentrations in each case. The ΣFIC50 were calculated using the equation: FIC50 artesunate (IC50 of artesunate when combined with pseudoceratidine/artesunate IC50) + FIC50 pseudoceratidine (IC50 of pseudoceratidine when combined with artesunate/pseudoceratidine IC50). Isobologram curves were constructed by plotting FIC50, pseudoceratidine vs FIC50, artesunate. A straight diagonal line (ΣFIC50 = 1) indicates an additive effect between artesunate and pseudoceratidine, a concave curve below the diagonal (FICindex < 1) indicates a synergistic effect and a convex curve above the diagonal (FICindex > 1) indicates antagonism.54
Supplementary Material
Scheme 2.
Syntheses of pseudoceratidine derivatives with variations in the pyrrole (aromatic) moiety.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Haoran Xue (Baylor University) for help in the characterization of some of the synthetic derivatives and Dr. D. E. Williams (Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, University of British Columbia), for his assistance in some of the HRMS measurements. Financial support was provided by a FAPESP BIOTA/BIOprospecTA grant (2013/50228-8) awarded to RGSB, CEPID-CIBFar grant (2013/07600-3) to GO, CNPq (grants 471509/2012-4 and 405330/2016-2) to RVCG, FAPESP Young Investigators Grant (2014/21129-4) to DCM and a FAPESP Regular Research Grant (2015/24595-9) to FRG. LLLP and AFB thanks CAPES for a PhD scholarship, and also for a Science without Borders scholarship at Baylor University for AFB. D. R. acknowledges the financial support from NIH (R37 GM052964) and from the Robert A. Welch Foundation (AA-1280).
Footnotes
Dedicated to Prof. Raymond J. Andersen, for his outstanding contributions to the chemistry of natural products.
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI:.
Isolation procedures, HRMS, IR, 1H and 13C NMR spectra of compounds 1-12, synthesis procedures and IR, HRMS, 1H and 13C NMR spectra of compounds 16, 17, 20, 21, 23, 25, 27 – 29, 31, 33, 35, 38, 39, 42, 43, 46, 47, 50 and 51.
References
- 1.Blunt JW, Copp BR, Keyzers RA, Munro MHG, Prinsep MR. Nat Prod Rep. 2017;34:235–294. doi: 10.1039/c6np00124f. and previous reviews in this series. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang X, Ma Z, Wang X, De S, Ma Y, Chen C. Chem Commun. 2014;50:8628–8639. doi: 10.1039/c4cc02290d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Al-Mourabit A, Zancanella MA, Tilvic S, Romo D. Nat Prod Rep. 2011;28:1229–1260. doi: 10.1039/c0np00013b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Braekman JC, Daloze D, Stoller C, van Soest RWM. Biochem Syst Ecol. 1992;20:417–431. [Google Scholar]
- 5.van Soest RWM, Braekman JC. Mem Queensland Mus. 1999;44:569–589. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Erpenbeck D, van Soest RWM. Mar Biotechnol. 2007;9:2–19. doi: 10.1007/s10126-005-6109-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cárdenas P, Pérez T, Boury-Esnault N. Adv Mar Biol. 2012;61:79–209. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-387787-1.00010-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tsukamoto S, Kato H, Hirota H, Fusetani N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996;37:1439–1440. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tsukamoto S, Kato H, Hirota H, Fusetani N. Tetrahedron. 1996;52:8181–8186. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ponasik JA, Kassab DJ, Ganem B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996;37:6041–6044. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Behrens C, Christoffersen MW, Gram L, Nielsen PH. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 1997;7:321–326. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ariey F, Witkowski B, Amaratunga C, Beghain J, Langlois AC, Khim N, Kim S, Duru V, Bouchier C, Ma L, Lim P, Leang R, Duong S, Sreng S, Suon S, Chuor CM, Bout DM, Ménard S, Rogers WO, Genton B, Fandeur T, Miotto O, Ringwald P, Le Bras J, Berry A, Barale JC, Fairhurst RM, Benoit-Vical F, Mercereau-Puijalon O, Ménard D. Nature. 2014;505:50–55. doi: 10.1038/nature12876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.World Health Organization; 2016. [Accessed in August, 2107]. www.who.int/leishmaniasis/en/ [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kedzierski L, Sakthianandeswaren A, Curtis JM, Andrews PC, Junk PC, Kedzierska K. Curr Med Chem. 2009;16:599–614. doi: 10.2174/092986709787458489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Croft SL, Olliaro P. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:1478–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03630.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tempone AG, Sartorelli P, Mady C, Fernandes F. Cardiovasc Hematol Agents Med Chem. 2007;5:222–235. doi: 10.2174/187152507781058726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gascon J, Bern C, Pinazo MJ. Acta Trop. 2010;115:22–27. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Schmunis GA, Yadon ZE. Acta Trop. 2010;115:14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Globalization and infectious diseases, a review of the linkages. WHO Special Topics. 2013;3 [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pereira PC, Navarro ECJ. Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 2013;19:19–34. doi: 10.1186/1678-9199-19-34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Santos MFC, Harper PM, Williams DE, Mesquita JT, Pinto EG, Costa-Silva TA, Hajdu E, Ferreira AG, Santos RA, Murphy PJ, Andersen RJ, Tempone AG, Berlinck RGS. J Nat Prod. 2015;78:1101–1112. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b00070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Reimão JQ, Migotto AE, Kossuga MH, Berlinck RGS, Tempone AG. Parasitol Res. 2008;103:1445–1450. doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-1154-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kossuga MH, Nascimento AM, Reimão JQ, Tempone AG, Taniwaki NN, Veloso K, Ferreira AG, Cavalcanti BC, Pessoa C, Moraes MO, Mayer AMS, Hajdu E, Berlinck RGS. J Nat Prod. 2008;71:334–339. doi: 10.1021/np0705256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gray CA, de Lira SP, Silva M, Pimenta EF, Thiemann OH, Oliva G, Hajdu E, Andersen RJ, Berlinck RGS. J Org Chem. 2006;71:8685–8690. doi: 10.1021/jo060295k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Somsák L, Kovács L, Tóth M, Ösz E, Szilágyi L, Györgydeák Z, Dinya Z, Docsa T, Tóth B, Gergely PJ. Med Chem. 2001;44:2843–2848. doi: 10.1021/jm010892t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Czifrák K, Somsák L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002;43:8849–8852. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Czifrák K, Szilágyi P, Somsák L. Tetrahedron Asym. 2005;16:127–141. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Czifrák K, Gyóllai V, Kövér KE, Somsák L. Carbohyd Res. 2011;346:2104–2112. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2011.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hanington PM, Jung ME. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994;35:5145–5148. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Somsák L, Nagy V. Tetrahedron Asym. 2000;11:1719–1727. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Barrow RA, Capon R. J Nat Prod Lett. 1993;1:243–250. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gribble GW. Fortschr Chem Org Naturst. 2010;91:1–505. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-99323-1_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Andersen RJ, Wolfe MS, Faulkner DJ. Mar Biol. 1974;27:281–285. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wischang D, Hartung J. Tetrahedron. 2011;67:4048–4054. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wischang D, Radlow M, Schulz H, Vilter H, Viehweger L, Altmeyer MO, Kegler C, Herrmann J, Müller R, Gaillard F, Delage L, Leblanc C, Hartung J. J Bioorg Chem. 2012;44:25–34. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2012.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wischang D, Radlow M, Hartung J. Dalton Trans. 2013;42:11926–11940. doi: 10.1039/c3dt51582f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rua CPJ, Oliveira L, Froes A, Tschoeke DA, Soares AC, Leomil L, Gregoracci GB, Hajdu E, Thompson CC, Berlinck RGS, Thompson FL. 2017 submitted. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bailey DM, Johnson RE. J Med Chem. 1973;16:1300–1302. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ye C, Shreeve JM. J Org Chem. 2004;24:8561–8563. doi: 10.1021/jo048383x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Troegel B, Lindel T. Org Lett. 2012;14:468–471. doi: 10.1021/ol2029993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Berman JJ. Taxonomic Guide to Infectious Diseases: Understanding the Biologic Classes of Pathogenic Organisms. Academic Press; Amsterdam: 2012. pp. 95–98. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bazzini P, Wermuth CG. In: The Practice of Medicinal Chemistry. 4. Wermuth CG, Aldous D, Raboisson P, Rognan D, editors. Elsevier; Amsterdam, Boston: 2015. p. 338. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bazzini P, Wermuth CG. In: The Practice of Medicinal Chemistry. 4. Wermuth CG, Aldous D, Raboisson P, Rognan D, editors. Elsevier; Amsterdam, Boston: 2015. p. 341. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wells TN, Hooft van Huijsduijnen R, Van Voorhis WC. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015;6:424–442. doi: 10.1038/nrd4573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Scala F, Fattorusso E, Menna M, Taglialatela-Scafati O, Tierney M, Kaiser M, Tasdemir D. Mar Drugs. 2010;8:2162–2174. doi: 10.3390/md8072162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tasdemir D, Topaloglu B, Perozzo R, Brun R, O’Neill R, Carballeira NM, Zhang X, Tonge PJ, Linden A, Ruedi P. Bioorg Med Chem. 2007;15:6834–6845. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2007.07.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Miguel DC, Flannery AR, Mittra B, Andrews NW. Infect Immun. 2013;81:3620–3626. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00687-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Peloso EF, Dias L, Queiroz RM, Leme AF, Pereira CN, Carnielli CM, Werneck CC, Sousa MV, Ricart CA, Gadelha FR. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2015.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Miguel DC, Yokoyama-Yasunaka JK, Andreoli WK, Mortara RA, Uliana SR. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;3:526–34. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Trager W, Jensen JB. Science. 1976;193:673–675. doi: 10.1126/science.781840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lambros C, Vanderberg JP. J Parasitol. 1979;65:418–420. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Smilkstein M, Sriwilaijaroen N, Kelly JX, Wilairat P, Riscoe M. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:1803–18063. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.5.1803-1806.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Denizot F, Lang R. J Immunol Methods. 1986;89:271–277. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(86)90368-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Gorka AP, Jacobs LM, Roepe PD. Malar J. 2013;12:332. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






