Skip to main content
Gut Microbes logoLink to Gut Microbes
letter
. 2017 Nov 8;9(2):102–103. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2017.1393143

Paper incompletely describes evidence-based usage of probiotics

Mary Ellen Sanders a,, Jessica Younes b
PMCID: PMC5989805  PMID: 29053042

We were concerned by the conclusions made in the publication by Rondanelli et al. titled, Using probiotics in clinical practice: Where are we now? A review of existing meta-analyses.1 This paper reviewed data supporting clinical uses of probiotics. However, the narrow scope of the review excludes some of the most compelling findings in the field and as such several important meta-analyses were not included.

The authors correctly note that recommendations can be made for clinical use of probiotics for prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea, prevention of C. difficile diarrhea, and reduction of risk for respiratory tract infections. However, they do not consider the following data for prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis,2 managing symptoms of colic,3 primary prevention of atopic dermatitis,4 treatment of acute pediatric diarrhea,5,6 maintenance of remission for pouchitis and ulcerative colitis,7,8 reducing risk of symptoms of lactose maldigestion,9 and prevention and treatment of bacterial vaginosis.10 For all of these conditions there are existing recommendations by different clinical organizations (including the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, World Gastroenterology Organisation and World Allergy Organization), by Cochrane, or in the case of lactose maldigestion, there is an approved claim in the European Union.11

Finally, we would like to call attention to a degree of imprecision in descriptions of some clinical endpoints, which could leave incorrect impressions about the target of some studies. For example, the paper refers to ‘probiotics for pancreatitis’ but is not clear that probiotics were tested for reducing infectious complications of pancreatitis, not for treating the condition.

We appreciate the opportunity to comment, which we hope will facilitate evidence-based usage of probiotics.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

Mary Ellen Sanders consults with numerous companies engaged in the sale of probiotic products, but has no ownership or profit-sharing relationship with any of them. She serves on scientific advisory boards for Danone, Yakult, The Dannon Company, Clorox and Winclove. Jessica Younes is employed as a full-time research scientist by Winclove Probiotics BV, a probiotic dietary supplement manufacturing and research company.

References

  • [1].Rondanelli M, Faliva MA, Perna S, Giacosa A, Peroni G, Castellazzi AM. Using probiotics in clinical practice: Where are we now? A review of existing meta-analyses. Gut microbes. 2017:1–23. [Epub ahead of print] doi: 10.1080/19490976.2017.1345414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Sawh SC, Deshpande S, Jansen S, Reynaert CJ, Jones PM. Prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis with probiotics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PeerJ. 2016;4:e2429. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Anabrees J, Indrio F, Paes B, AlFaleh K. Probiotics for infantile colic: a systematic review. BMC pediatrics. 2013;13:186. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Panduru M, Panduru NM, Salavastru CM, Tiplica GS. Probiotics and primary prevention of atopic dermatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(2):232–42. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Allen SJ, Martinez EG, Gregorio GV, Dans LF. Probiotics for treating acute infectious diarrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010(11):CD003048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Shen NT, Maw A, Tmanova LL, Pino A, Ancy K, Crawford CV, Simon MS, Evans AT. Timely use of probiotics in hospitalized adults prevents clostridium difficile infection: A systematic review with meta-regression analysis. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(8):1889–900 e9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Shen J, Zuo ZX, Mao AP. Effect of probiotics on inducing remission and maintaining therapy in ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, and pouchitis: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014;20(1):21–35. doi: 10.1097/01.MIB.0000437495.30052.be. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Dong J, Teng G, Wei T, Gao W, Wang H. Methodological quality assessment of meta-analyses and systematic reviews of probiotics in inflammatory bowel disease and pouchitis. PloS one. 2016;11(12):e0168785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Levri KM, Ketvertis K, Deramo M, Merenstein JH, D'Amico F. Do probiotics reduce adult lactose intolerance? A systematic review. J Fam Pract. 2005;54(7):613–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Homayouni A, Bastani P, Ziyadi S, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Ghalibaf M, Mortazavian AM, Mehrabany EV. Effects of probiotics on the recurrence of bacterial vaginosis: a review. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2014;18(1):79–86. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e31829156ec. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products NaA Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to live yoghurt cultures and improved lactose digestion (ID 1143, 2976) pursuant to Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. EFSA Journal. 2010;8(10):1763. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Gut Microbes are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES