Abstract
This study used the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program to evaluate octogenarians who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Specifically, we evaluated: (1) patient demographics; (2) perioperative factors; and (3) 30-day postoperative complications. Compared to controls, the octogenarians had more females, white patients, lower BMIs, fewer smokers, less functionally independent, higher ASA scores, shorter operative times, and longer LOS. Octogenarians had greater odds for developing any (OR = 2.05; 95%CI, 1.70–2.46), any major (OR = 2.28; 95%CI, 1.66–3.13), and any minor (OR = 1.99; 95%CI, 1.63–2.45) complications. Perioperative risk management strategies for elective TSA in the elderly may help mitigate the increased perioperative risks associated with age.
Keywords: Total shoulder arthroplasty, Shoulder arthroplasty, Octogenarian, Complications, Lengths of stay, Perioperative
1. Introduction
From 2000 to 2010, the number of Americans 80 years and older grew from 13.4 million to 16.7 million, representing a 25% increase.1 As Americans live longer, they continue to access care as evidenced by an estimated 14% of the procedures performed in ambulatory surgical centers are done on those over 75.2 Age alone is known to be a risk factor for perioperative morbidity and mortality, with one study reporting the 30-day mortality to be 51% in patients over 80 years across multiple surgical procedure types.3 Increases in operative length in particular have also been associated with increased mortality in those over 80 years.3 Special considerations already exist for the practice of surgical risk management in such patients, including careful preoperative cardiovascular risk assessment, selection of short-acting and regional anesthetic agents, and attempting to minimize operative length.3, 4, 5, 6 However, for specialized procedures such as total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), these general recommendations might need to be further adjusted.
The number of TSA procedures performed in the United States has increased alongside the aging population in recent years, with one study finding two-thirds of TSA patients to be over 65 years of age.7 Approximately 49 per 100,000 of those above 80 years of age undergo TSA, second only to patients aged 65–79 years.8 Mortality and readmission rates have been suggested to be higher for patients over 75 years who undergo TSA compared to younger patients, with similar rates of revision surgery.9 Additional data on disposition and lengths of stay (LOS) exist for these patients, but more specific data describing complications and perioperative patient characteristics are lacking.8
Therefore, the purpose of this study was to use a large prospectively collected national database to evaluate patients aged 80 years and older who underwent TSA to compare these patients to a cohort who were younger than 80 years. Specifically, we evaluated: (1) patient demographics; (2) perioperative factors such as anesthesia type, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, operative time, lengths of stay (LOS); and (3) 30-day postoperative complications.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Database
The present study used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database, which is a validated, prospectively collected, risk-adjusted database that collects data on patients who undergo surgery from approximately 700 hospitals in the United States.10, 11, 12, 13 Surgical clinical reviewers, trained by the ACS, record perioperative data at each hospital, including demographics, laboratory values, comorbidities, diagnosis as defined by International Classification of Disease 9th and/or 10th Revisions (ICD-9, ICD-10) codes, surgical procedure defined by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, and data related to discharge disposition, reoperations, readmissions, and mortality through 30 days postoperatively.
2.2. Study population
The NSQIP database was used to identify all patients who underwent TSA as defined by the CPT code 23472, from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2015. A total of 10,353 patients were identified and were then stratified into two cohorts based on age, which resulted in 8802 patients less than 80 years and 1551 octogenarians who underwent TSA and were included in the study.
2.3. Patient demographics
Patient demographics included age, sex, race (white, black, other), body mass index (BMI), calculated from reported height and weight) categories, including less than 24.9 kg/m2, 25 to 29.9 kg/m2, 30 to 34.9 kg/m2, 35 to 39.9 kg/m2, and >40 kg/m2, smoking status, and functional status. In addition, using the available comorbidity data, a modified Charlson comorbidity score was calculated.14 The modified Charlson score has been reported to be similar in efficacy when compared with the original Charlson score.15,16 The following comorbidities were included and were assigned the following point values: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (1 point), congestive heart failure (1 point), renal failure/end-stage renal disease (2 points), on a ventilator (2 points), ascites (3 points), and cancer (6 points); the scores were categorized as 0, 1, or ≥2.
2.4. Perioperative factors
The perioperative data collected included anesthesia type (general, regional or local, and other), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores (categorized as greater than or equal to 3 or less than 3). Additionally, the operative times (in minutes) and the hospital LOS (in days) were extracted from the database.
2.5. Postoperative complications
The 30-day postoperative complications were stratified by any, major, and minor complications, as described by previous studies.17,18 The major complications included stroke, cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, unplanned re-intubation, on ventilator for >48 h, acute renal failure, sepsis, and septic shock. The minor complications included superficial incisional surgical site infection, deep incisional surgical site infection, organ space infection, wound dehiscence, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, deep vein thrombosis, renal insufficiency, and transfusion.
2.6. Data analysis
All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 23 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York). All tests were two-tailed and a p-value of less than 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance. Descriptive statistics were performed for all study variables. Patient demographics including gender, race, BMI, Charlson scores, smoking history, and functional status, as well as perioperative data, were compared with chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables, and student’s t-test was used for continuous variables. Then, logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of any, major, and minor complications that occurred within 30 days postoperatively, while controlling for sex, race, BMI category, and Charlson/Deyo scores.
3. Results
3.1. Demographics
The mean age of the octogenarian cohort was 83 years (range, 80–89 years), and for the less than 80 years cohort, the mean age was 67 years (range, 19–79 years). Compared to the less than 80 years cohort, the octogenarians had significantly more females (66 vs. 55%, p < 0.0001), were more likely to be white (89 vs. 85%, p < 0.0001), had lower BMIs (28.1 vs. 31.4 kg/m2, p < 0.0001), were less likely to smoke (2.4 vs. 11.8%, p < 0.0001), and were less likely to be functionally independent (93.7 vs. 96.6%, p < 0.0001). Modified Charlson score distributions did not vary significantly between the two cohorts (p = 0.084) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Parameters | <80 years | ≥80 years | P-value |
---|---|---|---|
Number | 8802 | 1551 | n/a |
Gender, % (n) | <0.0001 | ||
Female | 55 (4800) | 66 (1028) | |
Male | 45 (3998) | 34 (521) | |
Race, % (n) | <0.0001 | ||
White | 85 (7477) | 89 (1383) | |
Black | 5 (406) | 2 (32) | |
Other/Unknown | 10 (919) | 9 (136) | |
BMI categories (kg/m2), % (n) | <0.0001 | ||
<24.9 kg/m2 | 15.7 (1381) | 27.4 (423) | |
25–29.9 kg/m2 | 31.3 (2751) | 40.9 (632) | |
30–34.9 kg/m2 | 26.9 (2366) | 22.3 (344) | |
35–39.9 kg/m2 | 14.8 (1299) | 6.4 (99) | |
>40 kg/m2 | 11.2 (988) | 3.1 (48) | |
Charlson/Deyo score, % (n) | 0.084 | ||
0 | 77.6 (6829) | 78.5 (1218) | |
1 | 20.2 (17,770) | 20.1 (312) | |
≥2 | 2.2 (196) | 1.4 (21) | |
Smoker, % (n) | 11.8 (1037) | 2.4 (37) | <0.0001 |
Functional status, % (n) | <0.0001 | ||
Independent | 96.6 (8505) | 93.7 (1454) | |
Partially dependent | 2.5 (224) | 5.1 (79) | |
Totally dependent | 0.1 (8) | 0.5 (7) | |
Unknown | 0.7 (65) | 0.7 (11) |
BMI = body mass index.
3.2. Perioperative factors
Compared to the less than 80 years cohort, octogenarians had higher ASA scores (p < 0.0001), shorter operative times (108 vs. 115 min, p < 0.0001), and longer LOS (3 vs. 2 days, p < 0.0001) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Parameters | <80 years | ≥80 years | P-value |
---|---|---|---|
Anesthesia, % (n) | 0.066 | ||
General | 96.1 (8458) | 95.2 (1477) | |
Regional or Local | 3.2 (282) | 4.4 (68) | |
Other | 0.7 (62) | 0.4 (6) | |
ASA score, % (n) | <0.0001 | ||
<3 | 50 (4402) | 35 (541) | |
≥3 | 50 (4388) | 65 (1010) | |
Operative time, minutes, mean (± SD) | 115.6 ± 48.4 | 108.3 ± 41.8 | <0.0001 |
LOS, days, mean (± SD) | 2 ± 2.8 | 3 ± 3.3 | <0.0001 |
ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists; LOS = lengths of stay.
3.3. Postoperative complications
Compared to less than 80 years cohort, octogenarians had a 105% higher risk for any complication (OR = 2.05; 95% CI, 1.70–2.46; p < 0.0001), 128% higher risk for any major complication (OR = 2.28; 95% CI, 1.66–3.13; p < 0.0001), and a 99% higher risk for any minor complication (OR = 1.99; 95% CI, 1.63–2.45; p < 0.0001) (Table 3). For the specific major complications, compared to the less than 80 years cohort, the octogenarians were more likely to be re-intubated (OR = 9.34; 95% CI, 3.56–24.79; p < 0.0001), on a ventilator for >48 h (OR = 11.27; 95% CI, 2.83–44.82; p = 0.001), develop a pulmonary embolism (OR = 3.91; 95% CI, 1.87–8.19; p < 0.0001), acute renal failure (OR = 15.86; 95% CI, 2.29–109.88; p = 0.005), a stroke (OR = 3.95; 95% CI, 1.18–13.25; p = 0.026); a myocardial infarction (OR = 4.91; 95% CI, 1.93–12.52; p = 0.001), and septic shock (OR = 12.36; 95% CI, 2.29–66.75; p = 0.003) (Table 4). Also, for the specific minor complications, compared to the less than 80 years cohort, the octogenarians were more likely to develop pneumonia (OR = 2.03; 95% CI, 1.08–3.83; p = 0.028), renal insufficiency (OR = 6.03; 95% CI, 1.59 to 22.85; p = 0.008), urinary tract infections (OR = 2.72; 95% CI, 1.67–4.45; p < 0.0001), and receive a blood transfusion (OR = 1.97; 95% CI, 1.56–2.49; p < 0.0001).
Table 3.
Parameters | Odds ratio (95% CI) | P-value |
---|---|---|
Any complication | 2.05 (1.70 to 2.46) | <0.0001 |
Major complications | 2.28 (1.66 to 3.13) | <0.0001 |
Minor complications | 1.99 (1.63 to 2.45) | <0.0001 |
Table 4.
Parameters | <80 years | ≥80 years | Odds ratio (95% CI) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Major | ||||
Stroke | 0.10% | 0.30% | 3.95 (1.18 to 13.25) | 0.026 |
Cardiac arrest | 0.00% | 0.00% | n/a | n/a |
MI | 0.10% | 0.60% | 4.91 (1.93 to 12.52) | 0.001 |
Pulmonary embolism | 0.30% | 0.80% | 3.91 (1.87 to 8.19) | <0.0001 |
Re-intubation | 0.10% | 0.60% | 9.34 (3.56 to 24.79) | <0.0001 |
On ventilator >48 hours | 0.04% | 0.40% | 11.27 (2.83 to 44.82) | 0.001 |
Acute renal failure | 0.02% | 0.20% | 15.86 (2.29 to 109.88) | 0.005 |
Sepsis | 0.20% | 0.30% | 1.75 (0.61 to 5.02) | 0.294 |
Septic Shock | 0.02% | 0.30% | 12.36 (2.29 to 66.75) | 0.003 |
Minor | ||||
Superficial SSI | 0.20% | 0.00% | n/a | n/a |
Deep SSI | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.54 (0.07 to 4.27) | 0.557 |
Organ space infection | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.47 (0.06 to 3.73) | 0.478 |
Wound dehiscence | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.64 (0.08 to 5.23) | 0.678 |
Pneumonia | 0.40% | 0.90% | 2.03 (1.08 to 3.83) | 0.028 |
Urinary tract infection | 0.60% | 1.70% | 2.72 (1.67 to 4.45) | <0.0001 |
Deep vein thrombosis | 0.30% | 0.30% | 1.08 (0.41 to 2.87) | 0.880 |
Renal insufficiency | 0.10% | 0.30% | 6.03 (1.59 to 22.85) | 0.008 |
Transfusion | 3.30% | 7.20% | 1.97 (1.56 to 2.49) | <0.0001 |
MI = myocardial infarction; SSI = surgical site infection.
4. Discussion
In the United States, the number of TSAs performed annually in older patients has increased, with most patients being older than 65 years.7 Despite the success of the surgery, elderly patients may be at a greater risk of adverse events after surgery, such as hospital readmission, longer LOS, and mortality. However, the literature on the adverse outcomes in patients aged 80 years and older is limited. The present study found that compared to patients younger than 80 years, octogenarians who underwent TSA were more commonly white women who had lower BMIs and were more dependent on others for activities of daily living, and tended to have longer LOS and increased complication rates after surgery.
There were some limitations to the present study. Since this database uses CPT codes for identifying surgical procedures, we were unable to differentiate between TSA and reverse TSA; however, other large database studies have shown that when evaluating shoulder arthroplasty, 42%–44% were TSAs, 32% to 37% were reverse TSAs, and 21% to 23% were hemiarthroplasties,19,20 and the outcomes of TSA and reverse TSA in patients older than 80 years have been shown to be similar.21 A previous report found that elderly patients were more likely to be admitted to the ICU during surgical care; information about patient location within the hospital (e.g. surgical intensive care unit or a step-down unit) may thus prove useful to remove level of care as a potential confound for age with respect to complication rates.22 Finally, collection of data for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) procedures is encouraged in future studies, as RSA incidence is increasing and outcome data are scarce.19 Despite these limitations, this study provides an important insight into the postoperative outcomes of octogenarians who undergo TSA.
The results to the present study are in accordance with other studies that have reported on TSA patients. For example, 66% of patients in our octogenarian cohort were female, consistent with previous reports of a higher percentage of female TSA patients in this age range 8. Also, female gender has previously been shown to be a risk for intraoperative complications during shoulder arthroplasty in addition to an increased age.23 Additionally, significantly more of the octogenarians were white and had lower average BMI as compared to the under-80 cohort, though the BMI in the octogenarian cohort was still in the overweight range. Combined with the fact that the under-80 cohort was more likely to be functionally independent, these data suggest that there may be increased vulnerability to insults among the octogenarian cohort beyond increasing age.
Increased age, along with decreased functional status, has also been previously been associated with increased postoperative LOS.24 The significantly increased LOS seen among 80-and-above patients in the present study was a risk factor in itself for perioperative morbidity and mortality, including acquisition of hospital-acquired infections in a surgical ICU setting.25,26 The decreased functional status of the 80-and-above cohort compared to the under-80 cohort may have also predisposed them to preventable complications like acquisition of infection or development of pressure sores.27 Beyond operative time, LOS and functional status may thus provide points of intervention for further risk management in elderly TSA patients. However, such interventions depend on the indication for TSA, such as the potential use of preoperative physical therapy aimed at optimizing mobility and functional independence before surgery is limited in the setting of emergent TSA for fall-related fractures. Similarly, though interdisciplinary postoperative planning between rehabilitation specialists, hospitalists, orthopaedic surgeons, and others may help reduce LOS, application of this practice may be complicated in patients with multiple injuries requiring multiple procedures.28
Octogenarians experienced significantly shorter TSA operative durations as compared to those 80 and under. This suggests awareness among the surgical and anesthetic teams of operative duration as a risk factor for morbidity and mortality among these patients, and indicates that risk management strategies may already be in place. However, regression analysis revealed that the octogenarian cohort exhibited significantly more complications of any type despite this decrease in operative times relative to the younger cohort of patients. Given that the modified Charlson scores were not significantly different between groups, it is likely that the increase in complication rates was truly correlated with increasing age. This effect of age on complication rates is consistent with reports from previous studies.3,23,29 The results of the present study are in accordance with those of Saltzman et al.30 who reported on 111 patients who had a mean age of 74 years who underwent primary TSA and found that 25% of patients developed any complication, with 9% major and 20% minor complications, including pulmonary embolus, renal insufficiency, asystole, and transfusion. However, our study differs from Ricchetti et al.31 who reported on the 90-day outcomes of 40 patients who were 80 years or older and 46 patients who were less than age 70 years who underwent TSA. They found that there were no significant differences between the older and younger groups in terms of major (7 vs. 2%, p = 0.35) or minor (23vs. 17%, p = 0.18) complication rates. However, they found that the older group had a higher rate of blood transfusions compared to the younger patients.
5. Conclusion
Our results confirmed that octogenarians who undergo TSA are at an increased risk of complications. Our observation of significantly shorter operative duration in these patients suggests risk management strategies are being applied but have not managed to fully mitigate the increase in perioperative risks associated with age. Lengths of stay and preoperative care, including optimization of functional independence for elective TSA procedures, may provide points of intervention for further risk management schema.
Conflicts of interest
Jared M. Newman, Sarah G. Stroud, Andrew Yang, Nipun Sodhi, Anant Dixit, James P. Doran, Andrew J. Hayden, Danielle J. Casagrande, Michael A. Mont: None.
Dr. Mont reports grants and other from Stryker, grants and other from DJO Global, grants and other from Sage Products, grants and other from TissueGene, grants and other from OnGoing Care Solutions, grants and other from Microport, grants and other from Orthosponsor, grant and other from National Institute of Health, grants and other from Jhonson and Jhonson, grants and other from Pacira Pharamaceutical, grants and other from Cymedica, grants and other from Peerwell, grants and other from Performance Dynamics Inc, grants from MallinckrodtPharmaceutical, grants from Abbott, grants from Mez, grants from Medical Compression Systems, outside the submitted work.
References
- 1.Werner CA. U.S. Census Bureau. The older population: 2010. https://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-09.pdf. (Accessed 30 August 2016).
- 2.Hall M.J., Schwartzman A., Zhang J., Liu X. 2010. Ambulatory surgery data from hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers: United States, 2010. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Turrentine F.E., Wang H., Simpson V.B., Jones R.S. Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203(6):865–877. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kanonidou Z., Karystianou G. Anesthesia for the elderly. Hippokratia. 2007;11(4):175–177. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Baquero G.A., Rich M.W. Perioperative care in older adults. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2015;12(5):465–469. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2015.05.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kim S., Brooks A.K., Groban L. Preoperative assessment of the older surgical patient: honing in on geriatric syndromes. Clin Interv Aging. 2015;10:13–27. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S75285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kim S.H., Wise B.L., Zhang Y., Szabo R.M. Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Jt Surg-Am. 2011;93(24):2249–2254. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Singh J.A., Ramachandran R. Age-related differences in the use of total shoulder arthroplasty over time: use and outcomes. Bone Jt J. 2015;97-B(10):1385–1389. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B10.35696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Anakwenze O.A., Yehyawi T., Dillon M.T., Paxton E., Navarro R., Singh A. Effect of age on outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty. Perm J. 2017;21 doi: 10.7812/TPP/16-056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.ACS American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, Participant use data file. 2016 https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/acs-nsqip/program-specifics/participant-use (Accessed 11 August 2016) [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hall B.L., Hamilton B.H., Richards K., Bilimoria K.Y., Cohen M.E., Ko C.Y. Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals. Ann Surg. 2009;250(3):363–376. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b4148f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Khuri S.F., Daley J., Henderson W. The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 1998;228(4):491–507. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199810000-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shiloach M., Frencher S.K., Steeger J.E. Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(1):6–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Charlson M.E., Charlson R.E., Peterson J.C., Marinopoulos S.S., Briggs W.M., Hollenberg J.P. The Charlson comorbidity index is adapted to predict costs of chronic disease in primary care patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(12):1234–1240. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sundararajan V., Henderson T., Perry C., Muggivan A., Quan H., Ghali W.A. New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57(12):1288–1294. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stavem K., Hoel H., Skjaker S.A., Haagensen R. Charlson comorbidity index derived from chart review or administrative data: agreement and prediction of mortality in intensive care patients. Clin Epidemiol. 2017;9:311–320. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S133624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Higuera C.A., Elsharkawy K., Klika A.K., Brocone M., Barsoum W.K. 2010 Mid-America Orthopaedic Association Physician in Training Award: predictors of early adverse outcomes after knee and hip arthroplasty in geriatric patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(5):1391–1400. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1804-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Belmont P.J., Goodman G.P., Waterman B.R., Bader J.O., Schoenfeld A.J. Thirty-day postoperative complications and mortality following total knee arthroplasty: incidence and risk factors among a national sample of 15,321 patients. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2014;96(1):20–26. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Westermann R.W., Pugely A.J., Martin C.T., Gao Y., Wolf B.R., Hettrich C.M. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in the United States: a comparison of national volume, patient demographics, complications, and surgical indications. Iowa Orthop J. 2015;35:1–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Day J.S., Paxton E.S., Lau E., Gordon V.A., Abboud J.A., Williams G.R. Use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the medicare population. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2015;24(5):766–772. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Triplet J.J., Everding N.G., Levy J.C. Anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients older than 80 years. Orthopedics. 2015;38(10):e904–10. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20151002-58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yu W., Ash A.S., Levinsky N.G., Moskowitz M.A. Intensive care unit use and mortality in the elderly. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(2):97–102. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.02349.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cowling P.D., Holland P., Kottam L., Baker P., Rangan A. Risk factors associated with intraoperative complications in primary shoulder arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2017;88(6):587–591. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1362155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Collins T.C., Daley J., Henderson W.H., Khuri S.F. Risk factors for prolonged length of stay after major elective surgery. Ann Surg. 1999;230(2):251–259. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199908000-00016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hassan M., Tuckman H.P., Patrick R.H., Kountz D.S., Kohn J.L. Hospital length of stay and probability of acquiring infection. Int J Pharm Healthc Mark. 2010;4(4):324–338. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Abelha F.J., Castro M.A., Landeiro N.M., Neves A.M., Santos C.C. Mortalidade e o tempo de internação em uma unidade de terapia intensiva cirúrgica. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2006;56(1):34–45. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942006000100005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Saraiva M.D., Karnakis T., Gil-Junior L.A., Oliveira J.C., Suemoto C.K., Jacob-Filho W. Functional status is a predictor of postoperative complications after cancer surgery in the very old. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(5):1159–1164. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5783-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.McCann-Spry L., Pelton J., Grandy G., Newell D. An interdisciplinary approach to reducing length of stay in joint replacement patients. Orthop Nurs. 2016;35(5):279–298. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.McVeigh T.P., Al-Azawi D., O’Donoghue G.T., Kerin M.J. Assessing the impact of an ageing population on complication rates and in-patient length of stay. Int J Surg. 2013;11(9):872–875. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Saltzman B.M., Chalmers P.N., Gupta A.K., Romeo A.A., Nicholson G.P. Complication rates comparing primary with revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2014;23(11):1647–1654. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ricchetti E.T., Abboud J.A., Kuntz A.F., Ramsey M.L., Glaser D.L., Williams G.R. Total shoulder arthroplasty in older patients: increased perioperative morbidity? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(4):1042–1049. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1582-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]