1. Introduction
Nearing a century since its inception, quantum mechanics is as lively as ever. Its signature manifestations, such as superposition, wave-particle duality, uncertainty principle, entanglement and non-locality were long confronted as weird predictions of an incomplete theory, paradoxes only suitable for philosophical discussions, or mere mathematical artefacts with no counterpart in the physical reality [1,2]. Nevertheless, decades of progress in the experimental verification and control of quantum systems have routinely proven detractors wrong [3–7].
Whereas there remains little doubt that quantum mechanics works and is one of the most accurate theories ever conceived to describe our universe, in particular at subatomic scales, considerable debate, however, remains on the interpretation of its elusive foundations [8].
Far from being deterred by Feynman’s safe assumption that ‘nobody understands quantum mechanics’, the international community has hence worked relentlessly to shed light on the physical meaning of fundamental quantum principles and to push the boundaries of the quantum description of the world. Such an effort, undoubtedly driven by curiosity at its raw roots, has also had a number of important paybacks.
On the one hand, this investigation has led to the creation of new fields of knowledge, like quantum information theory [9] and more recently quantum thermodynamics [10], as well as the development of novel mathematical and computational tools applicable to other domains, including condensed matter physics, statistical mechanics and cosmology [11]. On the other hand, research in quantum science is achieving a very concrete impact, as the improved understanding of the resource power of quantum phenomena [12,13] has triggered a technological overhaul that is rivalling the three major industrial revolutions of the last century [14].
The exciting prospects of superfast quantum computers, unbreakable quantum cryptography and ultrasensitive quantum sensors have captured the fascination of the general public, also thanks to the recent involvement of technology giants such as Google, IBM and Microsoft, who are striving to embrace the challenge to make quantum technology a household commodity in the near future [15]. It is, therefore, a very timely occasion to look back at the conceptual progress accomplished in understanding quantum mechanics in the past few decades, while acknowledging the transformative impact its modern applications are having on society. At the same time, it is even more intriguing to reflect on the most fundamental questions which remain wide open on the foundations of quantum theory, and wonder which blueprints for even more disruptive technologies could come along with addressing them.
This issue follows from a dedicated Scientific Discussion Meeting1 where these fascinating topics have been explored, giving rise to stimulating debates among speakers and audience. The present issue thus aims at conveying the spirit of those discussions, inviting interested readers on a wild ride from quantum foundations to applications and back [16]. Setting off from a foray into the often conflicting interpretations of quantum theory [17,18], the issue ventures into advances on the physical meaning of still puzzling phenomena, including quantum measurement [19], quantum randomness [20], (non)locality [21,22], particle indistinguishability [23], causality [24] and the nature of time [25]. The journey reaches up to the frontiers of the quantum world, by exploring the interplay of quantum mechanics with black-hole physics [26] and with thermodynamics [27], also investigating the emergence of the familiar classical world via quantum principles [28]. The peaks of quantum technology are then grazed with recent progress on topological quantum computing [29] and prospects of a quantum internet [30], as well as experimental advances in satellite-based quantum communication and verification of basic laws of quantum theory [31].
These contributions, together with many others not covered in this issue, demonstrate how far the multi-disciplinary community of quantum scientists and engineers has progressed in the quest for delivering innovative technologies of global impact, and yet how much there is still to discover on the very same groundwork on which our current description of the physical reality is based. We hope this issue may motivate future generations to delve even further into the quirky fabric of the quantum realm and keep the discussion on its foundations alive and healthy. The more we make sense of core quantum features, the better uses we can make of them to benefit society at large. The next revolution may be just a quantum bit away.
Footnotes
Data accessibility
This article has no additional data.
Competing interests
We declare we have no competing interests.
Funding
GA acknowledges financial support from the European Research Council (Grant no. 637352).
References
- 1.Einstein A, Podolsky B, Rosen N. 1935. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780. ( 10.1103/PhysRev.47.777) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bell JS. 1987. Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zeilinger A. 1999. Experiment and the foundations of quantum physics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, S288–S297. ( 10.1103/RevModPhys.71.S288) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wineland DJ. 2013. Nobel lecture: superposition, entanglement, and raising Schrödinger’s cat. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1103–1114. ( 10.1103/RevModPhys.85.1103) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Haroche S. 2013. Nobel lecture: controlling photons in a box and exploring the quantum to classical boundary. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1083–1102. ( 10.1103/RevModPhys.85.1083) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hensen B. et al. 2015. Experimental loophole-free violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electron spins separated by 1.3 km. Nature 526, 682 ( 10.1038/nature15759) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yin J. et al. 2017. Satellite-based entanglement distribution over 1200 kilometers. Science 356, 1140–1144. ( 10.1126/science.aan3211) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cabello A. 2017. Interpretations of quantum theory: a map of madness. In What is quantum information? (eds O Lombardi, S Fortin, F Holik, C López), ch. 7, pp. 138–144. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- 9.Nielsen MA, Chuang IL. 2000. Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vinjanampathy S, Anders J. 2016. Quantum thermodynamics. Contemp. Phys. 57, 545–579. ( 10.1080/00107514.2016.1201896) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Preskill J. 2000. Quantum information and physics: some future directions. J. Mod. Opt. 47, 127–137. ( 10.1080/09500340008244031) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Horodecki R, Horodecki P, Horodecki M, Horodecki K. 2009. Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865–942. ( 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Streltsov A, Adesso G, Plenio MB. 2017. Colloquium: quantum coherence as a resource. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 041003 ( 10.1103/RevModPhys.89.041003) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dowling JP, Milburn GJ. 2003. Quantum technology: the second quantum revolution. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 361, 1655–1674. ( 10.1098/rsta.2003.1227) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Castelvecchi D. 2017. Quantum computers ready to leap out of the lab in 2017. Nature 541, 9 ( 10.1038/541009a) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gisin N, Fröwis F. 2018. From quantum foundations to applications and back. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170326 ( 10.1098/rsta.2017.0326) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Auffèves A, Grangier P. 2018. Extracontextuality and extravalence in quantum mechanics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170311 ( 10.1098/rsta.2017.0311) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rovelli C. 2018. ‘Space is blue and birds fly through it’. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170312 ( 10.1098/rsta.2017.0312) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zurek WH. 2018. Quantum reversibility is relative, or does a quantum measurement reset initial conditions? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170315 ( 10.1098/rsta.2017.0315) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Grangier P, Auffèves A. 2018. What is quantum in quantum randomness? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170322 ( 10.1098/rsta.2017.0322) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Krämer L, del Rio L. 2018. Operational locality in global theories. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170321 ( 10.1098/rsta.2017.0321) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Unruh WG. 2018. Locality and quantum mechanics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170320 ( 10.1098/rsta.2017.0320) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Compagno G, Castellini A, Lo Franco R. 2018. Dealing with indistinguishable particles and their entanglement. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170317 ( 10.1098/rsta.2017.0317) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.D’Ariano GM. 2018. Causality re-established. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170313 ( 10.1098/rsta.2017.0313) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Vaccaro JA. 2018. The quantum theory of time, the block universe, and human experience. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170316 ( 10.1098/rsta.2017.0316) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Braunstein SL, Pirandola S. 2018. Quantum information versus black hole physics: deep firewalls from narrow assumptions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170324 ( 10.1098/rsta.2017.0324) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Popescu S, Sainz AB, Short AJ, Winter A. 2018. Quantum reference frames and their applications to thermodynamics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20180111 ( 10.1098/rsta.2018.0111) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zurek WH. 2018. Quantum theory of the classical: quantum jumps, Born’s Rule and objective classical reality via quantum Darwinism. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20180107 ( 10.1098/rsta.2018.0107) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Conrad J, Chamberland C, Breuckmann NP, Terhal BM. 2018. The small stellated dodecahedron code and friends. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170323 ( 10.1098/rsta.2017.0323) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dahlberg A, Wehner S. 2018. Transforming graph states using single-qubit operations. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170325 ( 10.1098/rsta.2017.0325) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Agnesi C. et al. 2018. Exploring the boundaries of quantum mechanics: advances in satellite quantum communications. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170461 ( 10.1098/rsta.2017.0461) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
This article has no additional data.
