Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Subst Use. 2018 Mar 2;23(4):436–440. doi: 10.1080/14659891.2018.1444108

Rolling and scrolling: The portrayal of marijuana cigars (blunts) on YouTube

LaTrice Montgomery 1, Andrew Yockey 1
PMCID: PMC5991612  NIHMSID: NIHMS948460  PMID: 29887756

Abstract

Background

Blunts are partially or fully hollowed-out cigars or cigarillos that are filled with marijuana. Despite the high prevalence of blunt use, very few studies assess this specific method of cannabis administration. YouTube, a popular video-sharing website, has the potential to provide insights into blunt use.

Methods

The purpose of this study was to examine the content of YouTube videos that discuss blunts. A sample of 41 videos was coded for content.

Results

The 41 videos had a total of 27,579,636 views. Most of the individuals in the videos were male (85%) and many appeared to be White (80%) and under the age of 25 (46%). Only 34% of the videos had an age restriction. The majority of messages in the videos promoted blunt use (93%) and showed at least one person rolling (76%) and/or smoking (66%) a blunt. The videos mainly consisted of introductions to blunt use (76%) and tips and personal experiences with blunt use (73%).

Conclusions

YouTube videos on blunt use are readily available and primarily promote the use of blunts. Future research should continue to monitor YouTube content and develop videos on social media platforms that inform consumers of the health effects associated with blunt use.

Keywords: Blunts, marijuana, YouTube, cigar, social media

Introduction

In 2014, 2.5 million people 12 years of age or older used marijuana for the first time during the past year, with an average of approximately 7,000 new users daily (Azofeifa et al., 2016). Further, the past year prevalence of marijuana use increased from 4.1% in 2001–2002 to 9.5% in 2012–2013 (Hasin et al., 2015). Marijuana use is associated with many neurological and social difficulties, such as delayed cognitive performance, deficits in attention, blunted motor activity, and relationship conflicts (Broyd, Van Hell, Beale, Yücel, & Solowij, 2016; Cerdá et al., 2016). Despite the negative consequences of marijuana use, the perceived risk of marijuana has decreased over the past years (Okaneku, Vearrier, McKeever, LaSala, & Greenberg, 2015) and the methods of marijuana administration have evolved beyond traditional marijuana joints (e.g., bongs, edibles; Schauer et al., 2014).

One increasingly popular method of consuming marijuana is through blunts. Blunts are partially or fully hollowed-out tobacco cigar or cigarillo shells filled with marijuana. Approximately 66% of past-year marijuana users 12 years of age or older report smoking blunts in the past year (Fairman, 2015). Moreover, 6% of middle school and 24.1% of high school students report lifetime blunt use (Eggers et al., 2017). Blunt use is associated with an increased risk of cannabis use disorder relative to non-blunt marijuana use (e.g., joints; Schauer, Rosenberry, & Peters, 2017; Timberlake, 2009). Further, compared to joint smokers, blunt smokers are exposed to higher levels of carbon monoxide, thereby increasing their risk of cardiovascular problems (Cooper & Haney, 2009). Blunt users are also exposed to quantifiable levels of nicotine from the tobacco products used to make blunts (e.g., Swisher Sweets cigarillos; Peters, Schauer, Rosenberry, & Pickworth, 2016), putting them at an increased risk for developing tobacco use disorder (Schauer et al., 2017; Timberlake, 2009). Despite the high prevalence and negative health consequences associated with blunt use, a recent review of marijuana and tobacco co-administered products found only 34 studies on blunt use. It is important to gain additional insight into this practice to inform prevention, treatment, and policy intervention strategies. One potential avenue for monitoring blunt use is through social media, especially given the high levels of blunt-related content found on Instagram (Cavazos-Rehg, Krauss, Sowles, & Bierut, 2016) and Twitter (Cavazos-Rehg et al., 2015).

Similar to Instagram and Twitter, YouTube is another popular social media site with a growing audience. YouTube is the most popular video-sharing website in the world and provides a platform for users to upload, view, share, and comment on videos about a variety of topics, such as blunt use. About 5 billion videos are viewed on YouTube every single day, with over 30 million visitors per day (YouTube, 2017a). Given the strong association between media exposure and risky health behaviors (Hebert et al., 2017; Jernigan, Padon, Ross, & Borzekowski, 2017; Krauss et al., 2017a), several studies have evaluated substance use content on YouTube (e.g., alcohol and cigarette use; Cranwell et al., 2017; Krauss et al., 2017b; Merianos, Gittens, & Mahabee-Gittens, 2016). Only three studies have assessed marijuana content in YouTube videos and they focus on marijuana product reviews (Cavazos-Rehg, Krauss, Sowles, Murphy, & Bierut, 2017), edibles (Krauss et al., 2017b), and dabbing (Krauss et al., 2015). All three studies highlight the ease of access to marijuana-related videos and the normalization and promotion of marijuana use on YouTube. No studies to date have explicitly examined blunt use content on YouTube. Given the potential that YouTube has to promote blunt use, the current study was designed to address this critical gap in the literature. This study aims to gain a better understanding of the popularity of blunt use videos on YouTube and the messages and imagery regarding blunt use in popular YouTube videos.

Methods

Data collection

We searched the YouTube video-sharing website on February 5, 2017 to identify videos related to blunts. The search terms were “marijuana blunt” and “cannabis blunt.” The videos were sorted through two different methods. First, the videos were sorted by YouTube’s default search strategy, “relevance,” to capture the videos that were most relevant to the search query. Second, videos were sorted by view count to capture the videos viewed most often. As consistent with other YouTube studies (Krausset et al., 2017b; Luo, Zheng, Zeng, & Leischow, 2014; Merianos et al., 2016), the first 20 videos were collected from each search and sorting method, resulting in 80 videos. Duplicates (N = 27) and videos that did not discuss or display blunts in the videos (N = 12) were removed. The final sample included 41 videos.

Codebook development

We modeled our codebook after existing YouTube studies on other methods of marijuana administration, including dabbing (Krauss et al., 2015) and edibles (Krauss et al., 2017b). In addition, two coders watched the first five blunt videos with the most views to identify other important recurring and relevant themes. After developing the codebook and clearly defining each category, the two coders viewed each video and classified the videos accordingly. The median Krippendorf’s alpha across codes was 0.82, ranging between 0.61 and 1 (Hayes & Krippendorff, 2007; Krippendorff, 2004). The highest level of disagreement was found on a category assessing whether a professional organization or amateur created the video. We decided to remove this category from the code-book. Other minor discrepancies were discussed and a consensus was reached between the two coders. The codebook assessed characteristics of the videos (e.g., published date), characteristics of individuals in the video (e.g., perceived gender), and messages/imagery in the video (e.g., rolling a blunt).

Classification of video content

Characteristics of the videos

We recorded the title, web address, channel name, published date, video length, and the date the channel joined YouTube for each video. We also recorded the view count, number of comments, number of likes, number of subscribers, whether or not the video was restricted to viewers 18 years of age or older (yes/no), and the video description. To further examine the popularity of blunt use videos on YouTube, we examined the view count on February 5, 2017 and 1 month later on March 5, 2017.

Characteristics of individuals in videos

We recorded the number of people in each video, along with the perceived gender (male/female/other/unable to tell), age (<25 years old/>26 years old/unable to tell), and race (African-American/Hispanic/White/Asian/Other) of the main messenger in each video. We also assessed the geographic location of individuals in the video (only if it was mentioned in the video or video description).

Messages/Imagery included in the videos

We classified all videos into one of three message-type categories: (1) pro, (2) anti, and (3) neutral. Similar to the study of Luo et al. on the portrayal of electronic cigarettes on Luo et al., (2014), “pro” messages referred to videos that promoted the use of blunts (e.g., presenting advantages of blunt use). “Anti” messages referred to videos that displayed the negative consequences of using blunts (e.g., presenting disadvantages of blunt use). “Neutral” messages included videos that appeared either positive or negative depending on the perspective of the video viewer when he/she is watching or it presents both negative and positive aspects of blunt use. Using yes/no responses, we also classified videos by whether or not (1) at least one person rolled a blunt in the video, (2) at least one person smoked a blunt in the video, (3) anyone in the video discussed other types of marijuana use (e.g., vaping), (4) anyone in the video mentioned a specific cigar brand (e.g., Swisher Sweets), (5) anyone in the video mentioned specific cigar/blunt wrap flavors (e.g., grape), and (6) anyone in the video discussed alcohol or other types of drug use (e.g., cocaine).

We also categorized videos by genre. Some videos were classified into more than one genre. Following the work of Luo and colleagues (2014), we defined each genre as (1) advertisement (videos created by companies to promote a specific brand or product), (2) user sharing (videos uploaded by users to share experiences or tips), (3) product review (videos comparing multiple blunt use products), (4) introduction (videos introducing blunt use in general and/or discussing innovative ways to roll or smoke a blunt), (5) celebrity use (videos showing celebrities smoking or rolling blunts), (6) free trial (videos featuring URL links or store address to get free blunt products), (7) news clip (news reporting about blunts), and (8) TV program or movie clips (including TV shows, interviews, or movie clips which focused on blunts).

Results

Characteristics of the videos

The final sample included 41 videos. On February 5, 2017, the videos had a median of 632,252 views and a total of 27,579,636 views across all videos. As shown in Table 1, the videos also had a high number of likes (186,902), comments (40,537), and channel subscribers (6,187,118). Between February 5 and March 5, the videos had a median of 5,197 new views (range 334–34,716) with a new total of 27,990,466 views. The average length for each video was 5.2 min, with a range between 50 s and 35 min. A small number of videos (34%) were restricted to YouTube users 18 years of age or older. All of the videos were published between 2007 and 2017, with the highest rates of videos published in 2014 (22%) and 2015 (32%). Most of the videos were created by channels who joined YouTube in 2014 (24%).

Table 1.

Characteristics of YouTube videos on blunts (N = 41).

Video characteristics Median (range) Total across videos
Number of views 632,252 (1,970–2,803,182) 27,579,636
Number of likes 2,195 (9–42,835) 186,902
Number of comments 361 (4–8,405) 40,537
Number of subscribers 18,934 (0–1,250,930) 6,187,118

Individual characteristics in videos

As shown in Table 2, the primary messenger in each of the videos appeared to be White (80%) and male (85%). The majority of individuals appeared to be under the age of 25 (46%). The location was not revealed in most of the videos. Among the videos that provided location information in the video description or during conversations in the videos (N = 8), California was the most popular location for YouTube videos on blunt use.

Table 2.

Characteristics of individuals in YouTube videos on blunts (N = 41).

Variable n (%)
Perceived gender of messenger
Male 35 (85)
Female 6 (15)
Perceived race of messenger
African-American 6 (15)
Latin American 2 (5)
White 33 (80)
Perceived age of messenger
<25 19 (46)
>25 16 (39)
Unknown 6 (15)
Location
California 4 (10)
Oregon 2 (5)
Colorado 1 (2)
Seattle 1 (2)
Not revealed 33 (80)

Messages/Imagery in videos

The majority of messages were “pro” blunt use (93%). Nearly half of the videos mentioned specific brands (49%; e.g., zigzag wraps) and approximately one-third of videos mentioned flavors (37%; e.g., strawberry). Most videos showed at least one person rolling (76%) and/or smoking (66%) a blunt. A few videos included discussions of other methods of marijuana administration (39%), such as joints and edibles, with a much smaller number discussing alcohol or other drugs (7%). As shown in Table 3, the majority of videos consisted of introductions to blunt use (76%) and/or user sharing experiences (73%).

Table 3.

Genres of YouTube videos on blunts (N = 41).

Variable n (%)
Advertisement
Yes 8 (20)
No 33 (80)
User sharing
Yes 30 (73)
No 11 (27)
Product review
Yes 6 (15)
No 35 (85)
Introduction
Yes 31 (76)
No 10 (24)
Celebrity use
Yes 2 (5)
No 39 (95)
Free trial
Yes 2 (5)
No 39 (95)
News clip
Yes 1 (2)
No 40 (98)
TV program or movie clip
Yes 3 (7)
No 38 (93)

Discussion

To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to examine blunt use content on YouTube videos. We assessed the characteristics of the videos, characteristics of the primary messenger in the videos, and messages/imagery in the videos to gain insight into the practice and to inform future interventions. The most popular blunt use videos on YouTube had a total of over 27 million views, with a 1% increase in the following month. The total number of views of blunt use content on YouTube is higher than that of other methods of marijuana administration, including dabbing (116 videos, 9,545,482 views; Krauss et al., 2015) and edibles (51 videos, 9,039,308 views; Krauss et al., 2017b). Further, the median views of blunt use videos on YouTube (N = 632,252) are higher than and similar to that of alcohol (70 videos, 132,939 views; Primack, Colditz, Pang, & Jackson, 2015) and cigarette (66 videos, 606,884 views; Carroll, Shensa, & Primack, 2013) videos on YouTube, respectively. These findings suggest that YouTube is a popular information-sharing platform for blunts and that interest in blunt use mirrors that of mainstream drugs such as alcohol and tobacco.

The unregulated discussion and portrayal of blunt use on YouTube provides a unique opportunity to not only assess this risky health behavior but also suggests that YouTube could be an influential vehicle for the dissemination of health information about blunts. A recent review of health videos on YouTube revealed the site is increasingly being used to disseminate information related to the pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of various health conditions (Madathil et al., 2015). The current study suggests that millions of people view YouTube as a viable option to learn about blunts and that they are willing to engage (e.g., comment, like) with online content related to blunt use. Anecdotal and scientific data (Dickinson et al., 2016; Sinclair, Foushee, Scarinci, & Carroll, 2013; Yerger, Pearson, & Malone, 2001) highlight misconceptions regarding many aspects of blunt use among adolescents and adults. Future studies might consider creating and assessing the effectiveness of YouTube videos that provide health education about blunts, using existing studies on the effectiveness of health education YouTube videos as a guide (Azer, Algrain, AlKhelaif, & AlEshaiwi, 2013; Fernandez-Llatas, Traver, Borras-Morrell, Martinez-Millana, & Karlsen, 2017).

Findings from the current study also suggest that the primary messengers in the videos appeared to be mostly White, male, and under the age of 25. Given the popularity of blunts among young males (Schauer et al., 2017), it is no surprise that the messengers in the YouTube videos were mostly male and under the age of 25. However, other social media studies on marijuana/blunt use suggest that messages regarding blunt use are most popular among African-American young adults. For instance, in an analysis of marijuana-related tweets (messages) among influential Twitter users (i.e., users in the top 25th percentile for both numbers of followers and Klout score [a measure of influence vs. number of followers]), a greater proportion of the Tweeters were African-American compared to the Twitter average (Cavazos-Rehg et al., 2015). This finding is also consistent with that of marijuana-related posts on Instagram (Cavazos-Rehg et al., 2016). The inconsistent finding on YouTube suggests that White individuals may be more comfortable sharing information about their blunt use in online videos, while African-American individuals may prefer to have written discussions and share pictures online about their blunt use. Additional research is needed to support this claim. It is also important to note that the racial makeup of individuals on Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube was inferred by researchers or through a series of algorithms in the studies described above. Future research should consider gathering demographic information directly from social media users and/or using other innovative approaches to capture the demographic characteristics of users.

The majority of YouTube videos in the current study promoted blunt use and also showed at least one person rolling and/or smoking a blunt. As suggested above, a great proportion of adolescents and young adults are using YouTube to learn about blunts and other risky health behaviors. In fact, a few of the messengers in the videos stated that their video was in response to a request from their subscribers to share a tutorial on a particular topic (e.g., how to roll a particular type of blunt, such as a honey or rose blunt). Similar to existing studies (Allem, Escobedo, Chu, Boley, & Unger, 2017; Krauss et al., 2017b; Roditis, Delucchi, Chang, & Halpern-Felsher, 2016), the images of individuals rolling and smoking blunts have the potential to normalize the practice and encourage the use of blunts to consume marijuana. Although very few videos consisted of advertisements by cigar/blunt wrap companies (20%), several messengers displayed a proud sense of loyalty to particular brands of cigar/blunt wraps (e.g., Swisher Sweets) and flavors (e.g., grape). The loyalty of YouTube messengers to certain blunt use products and flavors provides an informal method of advertisement that should be further assessed in future studies. Advertising guidelines on YouTube prohibit ads that advertise drugs and dangerous products or substances but allow for videos on “drugs or dangerous substances for educational, documentary, and artistic purposes … so long as drug use or substance use is not graphic or glorified” (YouTube, 2017b). Although content on YouTube is protected by the first amendment, the site has the right to age restrict or remove dangerous and harmful content if it meets certain criteria (e.g., serious acts of violence, YouTube, 2017b). Only 34% of the most popular blunt use videos had an age restriction, suggesting that the videos can be easily accessed by adolescents. Future research on policies and regulations regarding the marketing of cigars and marijuana should include policies that will monitor and provide clearer and stricter guidelines regarding blunt use content on social media sites, such as YouTube.

Although this study provides several insights into the understudied practice of blunt use on a popular social media site, a few limitations should be noted. First, we only used two terms (i.e., “marijuana “ and “ blunt cannabis blunt”) to identify YouTube videos about blunt use. Therefore, the sample may not be fully representative of all blunt use videos on YouTube. Second, the content on YouTube videos is constantly changing, suggesting that the results might vary at a subsequent point of time. Third, since the sample was limited to videos in English, the results are only mainly generalizable to the United States and perhaps other countries with large English-speaking populations who use blunts.

In summary, this is the first study to examine blunt use content and imagery on YouTube. Approximately 27 million people have viewed popular blunt use YouTube videos. The videos primarily promote the use of blunts and display images of individuals smoking and rolling blunts. Given the nondirected open exchange of ideas and imagery regarding blunt use on YouTube, it is critical to develop and assess YouTube health campaigns to inform blunt users of potential harms associated with blunt use. Future studies should also assess the relationship between exposure to blunt use messages on YouTube and actual blunt use.

Footnotes

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Allem JP, Escobedo P, Chu KH, Boley CT, Unger JB. Images of little cigars and cigarillos on Instagram identified by the hastag #swisher: Thematic analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2017;19:e255. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Azer SA, Algrain HA, AlKhelaif RA, AlEshaiwi SM. Evaluation of the educational value of YouTube videos about physical examination of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2013;15(11):e241. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Azofeifa A, Mattson ME, Schauer G, McAfee T, Grant A, Lyerla R. National estimates of marijuana use and related indicators – National survey on drug use and health, united states, 2002–2014. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Surveillance Summaries. 2016;65(11):1–28. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6511a1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Broyd SJ, Van Hell HH, Beale C, Yücel M, Solowij N. Acute and chronic effects of cannabinoids on human cognition—A systematic review. Biological Psychiatry. 2016;79:557–567. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carroll MV, Shensa A, Primack BA. A comparison of cigarette- and hookah related videos on Youtube. Tobacco Control. 2013;22(5):319–323. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cavazos-Rehg PA, Krauss M, Fisher SL, Salyer P, Grucza RA, Bierut LJ. Twitter chatter about marijuana. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2015;56(2):139–145. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.10.270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cavazos-Rehg PA, Krauss MJ, Sowles SJ, Bierut LJ. Marijuana-related posts on instagram. Prevention Science. 2016;17:710–720. doi: 10.1007/s11121-016-0669-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cavazos-Rehg PA, Krauss MJ, Sowles SJ, Murphy GM, Bierut LJ. Exposure to and content of marijuana product reviews. Prevention Science. 2017 doi: 10.1007/s11121-017-0818-9. epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cerdá M, Moffitt TE, Meier MH, Harrington H, Houts R, Ramrakha S, … Caspi A. Persistent cannabis dependence and alcohol dependence represent risks for midlife economic and social problems. Clinical Psychological Science. 2016;4(6):1028–1046. doi: 10.1177/2167702616630958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cooper ZD, Haney M. Comparison of subjective, pharmacokinetic, and physiological effects of marijuana smoked as joints and blunts. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2009;103(3):107–113. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.01.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cranwell J, Britton J, Bains M. F*ck it! Let’s get to drinking-poison our livers!”: A thematic analysis of alcohol content in contemporary YouTube musicvideos. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2017;24(1):66–76. doi: 10.1007/s12529-0169578-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dickinson DM, Johnson SE, Coleman BN, Tworek C, Tessman GK, Alexander J. The language of cigar use: Focus group findings on cigar product terminology. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2016;18(5):850–856. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Eggers ME, Lee YO, Jackson K, Wiley JL, Porter L, Nonnemaker JM. Youth use of electronic vapor products and blunts for administering cannabis. Addictive Behaviors. 2017;70:79–82. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fairman BJ. Cannabis problem experiences among users of the tobacco-cannabis combination known as blunts. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2015;150(1):77–84. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.02.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fernandez-Llatas C, Traver V, Borras-Morrell JE, Martinez-Millana A, Karlsen R. Are health videos from hospitals, health organizations, and active users available to health consumers? An analysis of diabetes health video ranking in Youtube. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. 2017 doi: 10.1155/2017/8194940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hasin DS, Saha TD, Kerridge BT, Goldstein RB, Chou SP, Zhang H, … Huang B. Prevalence of marijuana use disorders in the United States between 2001–2002 and 2012–2013. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72:1235–1242. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.1858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hayes AF, Krippendorff K. Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures. 2007;1(1):77–89. doi: 10.1080/19312450709336664. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hebert ET, Case KR, Kelder SH, Delk J, Perry CL, Harrell MB. Exposure and engagement with tobacco- and e-cigarette-related social media. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.04.003. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jernigan DH, Padon A, Ross C, Borzekowski D. Self-reported youth and adult exposure to alcohol marketing in traditional and digital media: Results of a pilot survey. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research. 2017;41(3):618–625. doi: 10.1111/acer.13331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Krauss MJ, Sowles SJ, Mylvaganam S, Zewdie K, Bierut LJ, Cavazos-Rehg PA. Displays of dabbing marijuana extracts on Youtube. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2015;155:45–51. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.08.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Krauss MJ, Sowles SJ, Sehi A, Spitznagel EL, Berg CJ, Bierut LJ, Cavazos-Rehg PA. Marijuana advertising exposure among current marijuana users in the U.S. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2017a;174:192–200. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.01.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Krauss MJ, Sowles SJ, Stelzer-Monahan HE, Bierut T, Cavazos-Rehg P. “It takes longer, but when it hits you it hits you!”: Videos about marijuana edibles on Youtube. Substance Use & Misuse. 2017b;52:6. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2016.1253749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Krippendorff K. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  24. Luo C, Zheng X, Zeng DD, Leischow S. Portrayal of electronic cigarettes on YouTube. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1028. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics Journal. 2015;21(3):173–194. doi: 10.1177/1460458213512220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Merianos AL, Gittens OE, Mahabee-Gittens EM. Depiction of health effects of electronic cigarettes on Youtube. Journal of Substance Use. 2016;21(6):614–619. doi: 10.3109/14659891.2015.1118565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Okaneku J, Vearrier D, McKeever RG, LaSala GS, Greenberg MI. Change in perceived risk associated with marijuana use in the United States from 2002 to 2012. Clinical Toxicology. 2015;53(5):151–155. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2015.1004581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Peters EN, Schauer GL, Rosenberry ZR, Pickworth WB. Does marijuana “blunt” smoking contribute to nicotine exposure?: Preliminary product testing of nicotine content in wrappers of cigars commonly used for blunt smoking. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2016;168:119–122. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Primack BA, Colditz JB, Pang KC, Jackson KM. Portrayal of alcohol intoxication on YouTube. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research. 2015;39(3):496–503. doi: 10.1111/acer.12640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Roditis ML, Delucchi K, Chang A, Halpern-Felsher B. Perceptions of social norms and exposure to pro-marijuana messages are associated with adolescent marijuana use. Prevention Medicine. 2016;93:171–176. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.10.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Schauer GL, King BA, Bunnell RE, Promoff G, McAfee TA. Toking, vaping, and eating for health or fun: Marijuana use patterns in adults, U.S., 2014. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2014;50(1):1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Schauer GL, Rosenberry ZR, Peters EN. Marijuana and tobacco co administration in blunts, spliffs, and mulled cigarettes: A systematic literature review. Addictive Behaviors. 2017;64:200–211. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sinclair CF, Foushee HR, Scarinci I, Carroll WR. Perceptions of harm to health from cigarettes, blunts, and marijuana among young adult African American men. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. 2013;24(3):1266–1275. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2013.0126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Timberlake DS. A comparison of drug use and dependence between blunt smokers and other cannabis users. Substance Use & Misuse. 2009;44(3):401–415. doi: 10.1080/10826080802347651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Yerger V, Pearson C, Malone RE. When is a cigar not a cigar? African American youths’ understanding of “cigar” use. American Journal of Public Health. 2001;91(2):316–317. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.2.316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. YouTube. Statistics. 2017a Retrieved July 16, 2017 from https://www.youtube.com/yt/about/press/
  37. YouTube. Advertising-friendly content guidelines. 2017b Retrieved July 12, 2017 from https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/6162278?hl=en.

RESOURCES