Skip to main content
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology logoLink to Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology
. 2018 Jun 8;9(6):157. doi: 10.1038/s41424-018-0031-6

Oxidative stress as a biomarker for monitoring treated celiac disease

Sarah Moretti 1,#, Simona Mrakic-Sposta 1,#, Leda Roncoroni 2,3,4, Alessandra Vezzoli 1, Cinzia Dellanoce 5, Erika Monguzzi 4, Federica Branchi 4, Francesca Ferretti 4, Vincenza Lombardo 2, Luisa Doneda 3, Alice Scricciolo 2, Luca Elli 2,
PMCID: PMC5992147  PMID: 29880904

Abstract

Introduction

High levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and impaired antioxidant defense systems lead to oxidative stress (OxS) and tissue injury in different intestinal and extra intestinal conditions, including celiac disease (CD). The aim of the present study was to investigate the role and potential use of ROS and other biomarkers of OxS in the clinical management of CD.

Methods

We collected duodenal specimens and blood samples from naïve patients (N-CD), patients on a gluten free diet (GFD) including responders (CD-GFD) and non-responders (NRCD).

We measured plasmatic ROS production (electron paramagnetic resonance, EPR), lipid peroxidation (thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances, TBARS), protein oxidation (protein carbonyl, PC), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), nitric oxides and glutathione (GSH) in erythrocytes.

Results

Fifty-four patients affected by CD were enrolled (17 N-CD, 18 CD-GFD and 19 NRCD; 44 F; age 44 ± 13 years). A significant increase of plasmatic OxS biomarkers (ROS, peroxidated lipids, oxidized proteins, and nitrate concentrations) and decrease of antioxidant species (TAC and GSH levels) were found in NRCD and N-CD compared to CD-GFD.

Comparably, a significant direct relationship between the severity of duodenal atrophy, ROS production rates and TBARS was found; conversely, TAC and GSH presented an inverse correlation.

Discussion

OxS is involved in CD tissue damage and correlates with the degree of duodenal atrophy. These findings suggest the possible role of OxS biomarkers as indicators of CD activity during the clinical follow-up.

Introduction

High levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and/or impaired antioxidant defense systems lead to oxidative stress (OxS)1 and tissue injury2. ROS are produced in cells during the metabolic pathways and they are potentially very dangerous because of their high reactivity. In physiological conditions the deleterious effects of ROS are counteracted by the antioxidant defense systems, such as non-enzymatic antioxidants (glutathione and vitamins) and antioxidant enzymes (i.e., superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase/reductase). If the production of ROS overwhelms the cellular antioxidant capacity, a condition known as OxS occurs3.

OxS is implicated in the damage of cellular lipids, proteins, and DNA, increased cellular swelling and decreased cell membrane fluidity. OxS plays an important role in the pathogenesis of many human diseases4 including several gastrointestinal disorders5,6. In celiac disease (CD), a chronic autoimmune enteropathy triggered by gluten ingestion in genetically predisposed subjects7, gluten promotes a Th1-driven autoimmune process that leads to a duodenal mucosal atrophy8,9. Currently the only effective treatment normalizing symptoms, autoantibodies (anti-transglutaminase type 2 IgA) and the small bowel mucosa is a strict and chronic gluten-free diet (GFD)10.

In most CD patients a clinical response is observed after only a few weeks complying with a GFD treatment11. Unfortunately, a complete clinical response and mucosal recovery do not occur in all patients12. Indeed, a subgroup of CD patients may have persistent or recurrent symptoms (e.g., diarrhea and abdominal pain), inflammation of the intestine and villous atrophy in spite of their GFD compliance13. Non-responsive CD (NRCD) may be defined as the persistence of symptoms, signs, or laboratory abnormalities typical of CD in spite of a 6–12 months long dietary gluten avoidance. NRCD is common, affecting 7–30% of all patients on GFD for CD14. There are many distinct etiologies, including unintentional gluten ingestion, other food intolerances (i.e., lactose and fructose), small-intestinal bacterial overgrowth, microscopic colitis, pancreatic insufficiency, irritable bowel syndrome, and refractory CD. While the CD diagnostic criteria are well known and well established, it remains difficult to define a correct use of available biomarkers during follow-up.

The molecular mechanisms underlying CD are still unclear, but a recent in vitro study has shown that OxS is implicated in the pathophysiology of the disease1517. Indeed, several investigations have shown that gluten exposure can induce an intracellular oxidative imbalance in CD patients, characterized by increased levels of lipid peroxidation products and oxidized/reduced glutathione ratio and decreased protein-bound sulfhydryl groups18. Moreover, celiac patients have been found to express significantly inducible nitric oxide synthase in the intestinal wall, which results in significantly increased levels of nitric oxide (NO)19,20. High contents of NO metabolites were also found in the plasma and serum of untreated CD patient21,22.

The broad spectrum of clinical manifestations of CD makes difficult to assess the disease activity in patients on a correct GFD by means of single measurements, while a multidisciplinary approach would possibly generate more meaningful outcome information.

In this regard, the first aim of the study was to investigate the effects of OxS in CD, evaluating the levels of: (i) ROS by using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) technique, able to provide the direct detection of the ‘instantaneous’ presence of free radical species in the sample;23,24 (ii) oxidative damage biomarkers detected by enzymatic methods in the plasma of celiac patients.

Our secondary aim was to look for new plasma biomarkers corresponding to morphological/functional alterations assessed by histology in duodenal biopsies.

Furthermore, possible correlations between ROS production, other biomarkers of OxS and hematological parameters were also investigated.

Methods

Subjects

Duodenal endoscopic biopsies and peripheral blood samples of celiac patients were analyzed. The diagnosis of CD was made at the Center for Prevention and Diagnosis of Celiac Disease of the Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico in Milan (Italy) according to the current international guidelines6. Oslo criteria for CD nomenclature has been followed14. Fifty-four CD patients was divided into three groups: Naïve celiac patients (N-CD, n = 17), GFD-responsive patients (CD-GFD, n = 18) and NRCD (n = 19). Furthermore, a control group (CTR) was added in the evaluation of ROS production rates, according to the value of ROS production rate assessed in one hundred healthy middle-aged sedentary subjects previously published24.

The investigation was approved by the local Ethics Committee (Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico n. 424bis 09/07/2014) and all the patients involved in the study gave their written informed consent.

Sample preparation

From each patient, at least 5 proximal small-intestinal biopsy specimens, as well as peripheral blood samples, were obtained. Endoscopic duodenal samples were routinely prepared for histopathological analysis as previously described25. Venous blood samples were collected, approximately 10 mL in heparinised, and 5 mL in EDTA vacutainer tubes, for the assessment of ROS, OxS biomarkers, hematological parameters and NO metabolites. Blood samples were taken in the morning, after at least 8-hour fasting, by a cubital vein puncture. Hematological values were determined using an automated hematology analyzer (Automatic Beckman Coulter LH-750), according to the standard laboratory procedures.

Parameters, such as hemoglobin (Hgb), hematocrit (Hct), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), red cell distribution width (RDW), platelets and absolute leukocyte count were recorded.

For the quantification of ROS production and OxS biomarkers, the heparinized blood samples, and for NO metabolites assessment, the EDTA blood samples, were centrifuged at 1000xg for 10 min at 4 °C. The samples of plasma and erythrocytes obtained were immediately stored in multiple aliquots at −80 °C until assayed. The samples were thawed only once before analysis, which was carried out within 2 weeks from collection.

Electron paramagnetic resonance for reactive oxygen species detection

All measurements were carried out by means of a X-band EPR spectrometer (E-Scan-Bruker BioSpin, GmbH).

For each recruited patient, the ROS production rate was determined using a recently implemented EPR method24,26. Briefly: 50 μL of each plasma sample was immediately treated with dissolved CMH (1-hydroxy-3-methoxycarbonyl-2,2,5,5-tetramethylpyrrolidine) probe (1:1). 50 μL of the obtained solution was put in a glass EPR capillary tube, in turn placed inside the cavity of the E-scan spectrometer for data acquisition (microwave frequency 9.652 GHz; modulation frequency 86 kHz; modulation amplitude 2.28 G; sweep width 60 G, microwave power 21.90 mW, number of scans 10; receiver gain 3.17.101). The sample temperature was stabilized and kept at 37 °C by the Temperature & Gas Controller “Bio III” unit, interfaced to the spectrometer.

All data were converted in absolute concentration levels (μmol· min−1) by adopting the CP (3-Carboxy-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-1-pyrrolidinyloxy) stable radical as the external reference. The high reproducibility of the EPR measurements was well demonstrated previously24.

HPLC analysis of erythrocytes glutathione

Total glutathione (GSH) was measured in erythrocytes by high-performance liquid chromatography, as previously described27. Values are expressed in μmol· L−1.

Lipid peroxidation

Lipid peroxidation was measured in plasma spectrophotometrically at 532 nm (Infinite M200, Tecan) by adopting the thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) assay kit (Cayman Chemical).

A linear calibration curve was calculated from differently concentrated pure malon-di-aldehyde (MDA) solutions.

Protein oxidation

A PC assay kit (Cayman Chemical) was used to colorimetrically evaluate in plasma the oxidized protein amount at 370 nm (Infinite M200, Tecan). The obtained values were normalized to the total protein concentration in the final pellet (280 nm), to take into account the protein loss during the washing steps.

Antioxidant capacity

Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) levels (mM) in plasma were estimated using Antioxidant Assay Kit (Cayman Chemical) following the manufacturer’s protocol. A Trolox standard curve was used to quantitate the antioxidant capacity of the sample, measured in millimolar Trolox equivalents at 750 nm (Infinite M200, Tecan).

Nitric oxides metabolites in plasma

Plasma EDTA samples were ultra-filtered through a 10 kDa molecular weight cut-off filter using an ultra-centrifuge at 14,000 × g for 60 min at 4 °C to reduce background absorbance due to the presence of hemoglobin. The ultra-filtered material was recovered and used to measure nitrite and nitrate concentrations using a commercial kit (Cayman Chemical). The samples were read by adding Griess reagents in at 545 nm. A linear calibration curve was computed from pure nitrite and nitrate standard.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism package (GraphPad Prism 7, GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

For all parameters, descriptive statistics were calculated and the normality of the distribution was checked by the Shapiro-Wilk normality test. Data are presented as mean ± SD, 95% CI. Comparisons between experimental data were analyzed using analysis of variance ANOVA with a Bonferroni post-hoc test. Spearman’s correlation coefficient test (r, 95% confidence interval (CI)) was used for identifying relationships among selected parameters.

The diagnostic performance of individual assays was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. A p < 0.05 value was considered statistically significant. The prospective power calculation to determine the significant experimental number was made by using the Freeware G*Power software (http://www.psycho.uniduesseldorf.de/abteilungen/aap/gpower3/). At a power of 80%, the calculated number of significant subjects was 11, well below the population of subjects recruited for this study.

Results

Fifty-four CD patients (44 females; mean age 44 ± 13 years, range 19–80 years) were enrolled. In detail: 17 N-CD, 18 CD-GFD, and 19 NRCD.

Demographic and hematologic results are reported in Table 1. Age, gender, and GFD were not statistically different among the three groups. The investigated blood parameters, excluding leukocyte and platelet counts, were significantly lower in N-CD and NRCD compared to CD-GFD patients (p < 0.05).

Table 1.

Clinical, demographic, and biochemical parameters of enrolled patients

N-CD CD-GFD NRCD
N (m/f) 17 (5/11) 18 (1/17) 19 (4/15)
Age (years) 38.8 ± 10.4 43.1 ± 10.2 49.3 ± 16.6
Marsh-Oberhuber score
0 0 13 0
1 0 5 0
2 0 0 2
3a 6 0 10
3b 8 0 2
3c 3 0 5
GFD duration (months) Not applicable 117 ± 84 86 ± 82
Leukocytes (199/L) 6.9 ± 1.6 6.3 ± 1.4 6.0 ± 1.2
Erythrocytes (1012/L) 4.2 ± 0.2 4.6 ± 0.6* 4.2 ± 0.3*
Hemoglobin Hb (g/dL) 12.8 ± 1.9 14.3 ± 1.1* 12.9 ± 1.1*
Hematocrit Hct (%) 38.6 ± 4.1 42.4 ± 4.3* 39.6 ± 2.4*
Corpuscular volume (fL) 82.7 ± 8.1 89.1 ± 6.4* 86.8 ± 7.1
MCH (pg) 28.1 ± 2.5 31.1 ± 1.7*** 29.4 ± 2.1*
MCHC (g/dL) 32.7 ± 1.5 33.9 ± 0.1* 32.8 ± 1.1*
RDW (%) 13.1 ± 1.2 14.7 ± 1.1*** 13.5 ± 1.2***
Platelets (109/L) 271.2 ± 66.8 281.5 ± 44.1 305.0 ± 54.7

Data expressed as mean ± SD.

CD celiac disease, GFD gluten free diet, MCH Mean corpuscular hemoglobin, MCHC mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, N-CD naïve celiac patients, CD-GFD GFD-responsive patients, NRCD non-responsive CD, RDW red blood cell distribution width.

Significant differences compared to N-CD: *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.

As shown in Fig. 1A, plasmatic ROS production is significantly increased in N-CD (0.21 ± 0.03 μmol· min−1) and NRCD (0.22 ± 0.04 μmol·min−1) patients compared with CD-GFD (0.17 ± 0.03 μmol·min−1). Moreover, no significant difference was found between CD-GFD and CTR (0.17 ± 0.03, vs 0.16 ± 0.02 μmol· min−1 respectively)24.

Fig. 1. Scatter plots of oxidative stress biomarkers.

Fig. 1

A ROS production rate (μmol· min−1) detected by EPR technique; B total antioxidant capacity (TAC, mmol·equiv·Trolox/L); C total glutathione (GSH, μmol· L−1) concentrations in erythrocytes; D thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS, μM); E protein carbonyl (PC, nmol. mg−1 protein) in plasma of N-CD (n = 17, square symbol), CD-GFD (n = 18, circle symbol) and NRCD (n = 19, triangle symbol) patients and in healthy subjects as controls (CTR, the empty square, n = 100) evaluated in Mrakic-Sposta S. et al., 2014. The results are expressed as mean ± SD. Significant differences: *p < 0.05; #p < 0.01

Plasmatic TAC levels were significantly lower in the N-CD and NRCD groups compared with CD-GFD (1.07 ± 0.30 mM vs 1.16 ± 0.47 mM vs 1.68 ± 0.54 mM in N-CD, NRCD, and CD-GFD respectively) (Fig. 1B). Similarly, GSH levels in erythrocytes were significantly lower in the N-CD and NRCD (Fig. 1C) compared with CD-GFD (534.40 ± 37.46 μmol· L−1 vs 507.80 ± 81.73 μmol· L−1 vs 634.00 ± 187.80 μmol· L−1 in N-CD, NRCD, and CD-GFD respectively).

Oxidative damage in plasma was assessed by TBARS and PC determination: Fig. 1D shows significantly higher values of TBARS in the N-CD and NRCD groups compared to CD-GFD (3.59 ± 0.67 μM vs 3.46 ± 0.87 μM vs 2.82 ± 0.47 μM in N-CD, NRCD, and CD-GFD respectively). Accumulation of PC (Fig. 1E) was significantly higher in the N-CD and NRCD compared to CD-GFD (1.42 ± 0.43 nmol. mg−1 protein vs 1.23 ± 0.53 nmol. mg−1 protein vs 0.91 ± 0.20 nmol. mg−1 protein in N-CD, NRCD, and CD-GFD respectively).

In Fig. 2 data of plasmatic nitrates concentrations (NOx = NO2 + NO3) are reported. Significantly higher values were recorded for the NRCD and N-CD compared to CD-GFD (99.74 ± 30.76 μmol· L−1 vs 54.61 ± 14.57 μmol· L−1 vs 22.21 ± 6.92 μmol· L−1 in NRCD, N-CD, and CD-GFD respectively) and a significantly different NOx concentration between N-CD and NR-CD was recorded too.

Fig. 2. Scatter plots of the plasma nitrate concentration (μmol· L−1) in N-CD (n = 17, square symbol), CD-GFD (n = 18, circle symbol), and NRCD (n = 19, triangle symbol) patients.

Fig. 2

The results are expressed as mean ± SD. Significant differences: #p < 0.01 and §p < 0.001

The possible correlation between the classification of histologic findings in CD (Marsh grade), plasmatic ROS production and OxS biomarkers was investigated for all the groups (CD-GFD, N-CD, and NRCD) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. The relationship between the Marsh score and oxidative stress biomarkers.

Fig. 3

A ROS production rate (μmol· min−1), B TAC (mmol.equiv.Trolox.L−1), C GSH (μmol·L−1), D TBARS (μM) and (E) PC (nmol. mg−1 protein) assessed in the plasma of N-CD (n = 17, white symbol), CD-GFD (n = 18, gray symbol) and NRCD (n = 19, black symbol) patients. The linear regression fit (solid line) is reported for each relationship

A significant direct relationship was found between the Marsh score and ROS production rate (R2 = 0.19; p < 0.0009), TBARS (R2 = 0.19; p < 0.0001), and PC (R2 = 0.16; p < 0.002) (Fig. 3A,D,E). Contrariwise, an inverse correlation was found between the Marsh grade and TAC (R2 = 0.22; p < 0.0003) and GSH (R2 = 0.34; p < 0.0001) (Fig. 3B, C).

For all the three groups of patients, a correlation between ROS production, GSH in erythrocytes and TBARS concentrations was found (Fig. 4). A positive relationship was found between ROS production and TBARS concentration (R2 = 0.36; p < 0.0001) (Fig. 4a), while an inverse relationship was found with GSH concentration (R2 = 0.27; p < 0.0001) (Fig. 4b). At high ROS production rate levels corresponded greater TBARS concentrations and lower GSH levels.

Fig. 4. The relationship between selected oxidative stress biomarkers.

Fig. 4

A TBARS (μM), B GSH (μmol· L−1), and (C) between TBARS (μM) and GSH (μmol· L−1) in the plasma of N-CD (n = 17, white symbol), CD-GFD (n = 18, gray symbol) and NRCD (n = 19, black symbol) patients. The linear regression fit (solid line) is reported for each relationship

Moreover, a positive relationship was found between TBARS concentrations and GSH levels (R2 = 0.16; p < 0.001) (Fig. 4C), as a correlation between OxS biomarkers and hematological data for the N-CD and NRCD groups (no correlation was found in CD-GFD group). Table 2 reports the significant correlation in both groups of CD patents.

Table 2.

Relationships between the OxS biomarkers and hematologic data of the patients affected by CD

R 2 P
N-CD Hemoglobin vs TAC 0.22 0.05
Leukocytes 0.35 0.01
Erythrocytes 0.26 0.03
Hematocrit 0.27 0.03
Corpuscular volume 0.64 0.001
MCH 0.30 0.02
Hematocrit vs Hemoglobin 0.26 0.03
Corpuscular volume 0.29 0.02
MCH 0.30 0.02
NRCD Hemoglobin vs Corpuscular volume 0.44 0.002
MCHC 0.26 0.02
Hematocrit vs Total GSH 0.22 0.04

Finally, we analyzed the ROC curves of OxS markers to discriminate duodenal atrophy (i.e., Marsh 3 lesions) and of ROS to discriminate the different CD types (CD-GFD, N-CD, and NRCD). ROS showed a good area under the curve (>0.7) to discriminate atrophy and NRCD (see supplementary figure 1).

Discussion

Our study demonstrates the impairment of oxidative balance in CD patients, both treated and untreated, and the potential use of OxS biomarkers in clinical practice during follow-up. The main purpose of this study was to describe the oxidative profile of celiac patients, especially of those not responding to GFD.

There is a growing number of studies in the literature showing how ROS are involved in the pathology of many diseases, including several gastrointestinal disorders.

CD is an autoimmune gastrointestinal disorder caused by gluten ingestion in genetically predisposed individuals leading to an atrophy of the duodenal mucosa. Its clinical presentation is heterogeneous and varies greatly with the age of patients, duration, and intensity of the disease and the possible presence of extra-intestinal disorders28. Inflammation and OxS due to an increase of ROS and a decrease of antioxidant defenses are involved in the molecular mechanisms of CD18,29,30.

Understanding the oxidative-inflammatory altered condition that characterizes NRCD patients is a critical achievement for the development of new medical (and pharmacological) approaches.

Currently, physicians are unable with serological biomarkers to distinguish patients with active or inactive CD during GFD. As invasive techniques are still required to differentiate between different forms of CD, the purpose of the present analysis has been to evaluate the ability of markers from peripheral blood to distinguish the various CD subsets.

For the first time, the present study shows a significant correlation between plasmatic ROS content, quantified with EPR direct method, and the disease histological grade (Marsh-Oberhuber) and type, especially NRCD, as demonstrated by ROC.

No significant difference was detected between celiac patients and healthy controls in respect to age and gender.

In CD iron deficiency anemia is primarily a consequence of the chronic mucosal damage and impairment of absorption mechanisms in the small bowel, due to the inflammatory process3133. In our study hemoglobin values in CD and NRCD were in the normal range 12–15.6 g/dL, although there was a clear trend towards mild anemia. According to the results, it clearly appears that NRCD patients, in spite of the GFD therapy, have a hematologic framework comparable to N-CD patients, in whom the pathology was diagnosed for the first time.

The pathogenesis of CD has not been fully explained. The imbalance of OxS was demonstrated in the pathomechanism of gastrointestinal diseases, in particularly for CD in adults, and is also followed by an increased production of ROS34 and reduced antioxidant protection. Indeed Boda et al35. suggested that in patients with active CD, gluten ingestion, along with the resulting inflammation, causes the activation of xantine oxidase in enterocytes, which results in the overproduction of ROS and further damage to the intestinal mucosa. Moreover the results of various investigations suggest that gliadin disturbs the pro-oxidant-antioxidant balance in the small-intestinal mucosa of affected individuals through the overproduction of ROS30,35.

In our study analyzing the plasma levels of ROS production, a significant increase in adult N-CD and NRCD compared to CD-GFD patients was recorded. Significant decrease of the TAC levels in patients with naive CD (35%) and celiac patients not responding to a GFD (25%) as compared to celiac patients responder to GFD was observed too. This indicates an inadequate physiological response to a higher rate of production of ROS in active celiac patients and especially in NRCD patients, for whom the TAC is still compromised in spite of their GFD regimen. The lower plasmatic TAC in N-CD and especially in NRCD patients is probably the result of a malabsorption of dietary antioxidants due to the mucosal damage. In agreement with this hypothesis other authors have reported lower levels of antioxidants (retinol, α-tocopherol, and ascorbic acid) in the plasma of patients with active CD29,36.

The GSH redox cycle is the principal mechanism of detoxifying lipid hydroperoxides in the intestine37. High levels of cell GSH are preserved by de-novo synthesis, regeneration from glutathione disulfide, and in several cell types, including enterocytes, by an import via a Na+-dependent transport system38. Several in-vitro studies have reported on the pro-oxidative effects of gliadin in human intestinal cell cultures; Rivabene and colleagues39 showed that the antiproliferative effect of gliadin is associated with pro-oxidative changes, such as the high level of lipid hydroperoxides, reduction of GSH level and gradual disappearance of sulfhydryl groups in proteins. Elli et al. demonstrated that gliadin causes a reduction in the GSH content and a gliadin concentration-related decrease in the activity of glutathione reductase, glutathione peroxidase and GSH-S-transferase5.

Besides the intestinal mucosa, the erythrocytes are rich in glutathione and glutathione-related enzymes. In our study, a significant lower (23%) GSH concentration was found in the erythrocytes of N-CD and NRCD patients compared to control subjects. The low concentration of GSH in NRCD patients can be explained with the assumption that there is a decrease in glutathione peroxidase and glutathione reductase activities such as reported both in biopsies and erythrocytes from celiac patients with severe villous atrophy40,41.

It is very interesting to note how GSH concentration is also indirectly related to a clinical parameter such as Marsh score. Furthermore, in CD patients the ROS production resulted correlated positively with TBARS and negatively with GSH levels as previously reported in healthy subjects24,42. In this study for the first time we have demonstrated significant correlations between the histological grade (Marsh-Oberhuber) score and TAC (Fig. 3B) GSH (Fig. 3C), ROS production (Fig. 3a) and OxS biomarkers (TBARS: Fig. 3D; PC: Fig. 3E).

An increased plasma concentration of TBARS (23%) indicating a not adequate anti-oxidative system in N-CD and NRCD patients compared to CD-GFD subjects was found. The data are in agreement with those reported by Stojiljkovic et al43. on plasma lipid peroxidation biomarkers in active celiac patients.

The increased lipid peroxidation of plasma chylomicrons and low-density lipoproteins in a celiac patient has been also reported44. It was shown that a high lipid hydroperoxides level causes single- and double-strand DNA breaks as well as the oxidative damage of cell membranes45.

In our study, the increase of TBARS concentration correlated with the reduction of the GSH content. Elevated TBARS and the shift of the cellular pro-oxidant/antioxidant balance, is reported affect cell proliferation, differentiation or apoptotic responses and disrupt tissue homeostasis37. This may, in part, explain the increased risk of refractory CD and malignancy, observed in celiac patients that do not respond to a GFD.

The PC content is the most general and widely used marker of severe oxidative protein damage. In our study, we have found a significant increase: 51% in N-CD and 17% in NRCD patients compared to CD-GFD subjects. The data are consistent with those reported by Odetti et al29.

NO is a free radical gas, produced by the enzyme NO synthase (NOS), that has a wide variety of physiological and pathological roles in the gastrointestinal tract21,46. NO is rapidly metabolized by erythrocytes into the stable end-products nitrate and nitrite (NOx), which can be easily measured21.

Some authors have noted increased levels of NOx in the serum and urine of CD children, with a positive correlation between the concentration of NOx and increased concentration of iNOS in the small intestine19,47,48. Murray et al. have showed that plasmatic NOx concentrations in adult patients with CD are higher than in treated patients with GFD and those with other upper gastrointestinal disorders21. The higher production of NO metabolites and the consequent nitrosative stress promote the impairment of tight junctions in the small intestine of CD patients, perhaps by down-regulating the expression of zona-ocludens-149.

The results of our study, where NRCD patients exhibited high levels of NOx compared to the control condition and showed severe histologic changes too, are similar to data reported previously21,22. Moreover, ROC analysis confirmed the usefullness fo ROS in discriminating the NRCD from the responsovise CD wirg represents a diagnostic dillemma.

Conclusions

Our study investigated the possible correlations in all the patient groups of OxS biomarkers with the Marsh-score classified histologic findings in CD.

For the first time we have shown how the increase in the ROS production rate, assessed in the peripheral blood, is in strict correlation with the severity of intestinal damage, evaluated by histological analysis (Marsh score).

Moreover our results confirm that OxS is strongly associated with gluten-related disorders and an important factor in the pathogenesis of CD so it may be an important additional parameter for monitoring a gluten-related disorder and for establishing the effectiveness of GFD.

Study Highlights

What is current knowledge

  • Oxidative stress is involved in the damage of cellular lipids, proteins and DNA, increased cellular swelling and decreased cell membrane fluidity

  • Oxidative system imbalance plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of different gastrointestinal disorders.

  • In celiac disease, an impairment of oxidative balance has been demonstrated after gluten exposure.

What is new here

  • An alteration of oxidative stress biomarkers has been found in naïve and non responsive celiac patients compared to responsive patients.

  • A significant correlation between the severity of duodenal atrophy and reactive oxygen species have been found.

  • The alterations of oxidative stress biomarkers and their correlation with the intestinal damage could be useful as indicators of celiac disease activity

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Figure 1 (106.8KB, pdf)

Conflict of interest

Guarantor of the article: Elli L. is the author who accepts full responsibility for the conduct of the study.

Specific authors' contributions

Moretti S., Mrakic-Sposta S., Roncoroni L. and Elli L. planned the study and interpreted the data. Monguzzi E., Dellanoce C., Lombardo V, Vezzoli A. were involved in the collection of data. Moretti S, Branchi F., Ferretti F. and Scricciolo A. significantly contributed to the draft of the manuscript. Moretti S, Mrakic-Sposta S, Vezzoli A, Doneda L. and Elli L. critically revised the manuscript. Every author approved the final draft submitted.

Financial support

Research support for this study was provided in part by grants from the Italian Ministry of Health and Lumbardy’s Regional Government Authority (Ministerodella Salute e RegioneLombardia call no. R.F.GR 2011-02348234).

Potential competing interests

None.

Footnotes

These authors contributed equally: Moretti Sarah, Mrakic-Sposta Simona

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41424-018-0031-6.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Halliwell B. How to characterize a biological antioxidant. Free Radic. Res. Commun. 1990;9:1–32. doi: 10.3109/10715769009148569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sies H. Oxidative stress: from basic research to clinical application. Am. J. Med. 1991;91:31S–38S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90281-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pham-Huy LA, He H, Pham-Huy C. Free radicals, antioxidants in disease and health. Int. J. Biomed. Sci. 2008;4:89–96. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bagdi E, et al. Mucosal intra-epithelial lymphocytes in enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma, ulcerative jejunitis, and refractory celiac disease constitute a neoplastic population. Blood. 1999;94:260–264. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Elli L, Dolfini E, Bardella MT. Gliadin cytotoxicity and in vitro cell cultures. Toxicol. Lett. 2003;146:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Elli L, et al. Nomenclature and diagnosis of gluten-related disorders: a position statement by the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists and Endoscopists (AIGO) Dig. Liver Dis. 2017;49:138–146. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Murray JA. The widening spectrum of celiac disease. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999;69:354–365. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/69.3.354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Makovicky P. What can we do to promote the recognition of celiac disease: a report on diagnostic strategies. Bratisl. Lek. Listy. 2010;111:163–165. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gujral N, Freeman HJ, Thomson AB. Celiac disease: prevalence, diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment. World J. Gastroenterol. 2012;18:6036–6059. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i42.6036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Green PH. Where are all those patients with Celiac disease? Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2007;102:1461–1463. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01167.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Murray JA, et al. Effect of a gluten-free diet on gastrointestinal symptoms in celiac disease. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004;79:669–673. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/79.4.669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rostom A, Murray JA, Kagnoff MF. American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute technical review on the diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 2006;131:1981–2002. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bardella MT, et al. Coeliac disease: a histological follow-up study. Histopathology. 2007;50:465–471. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2007.02621.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ludvigsson JF, et al. The Oslo definitions for coeliac disease and related terms. Gut. 2013;62:43–52. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Stojiljković V, et al. Glutathione redox cycle in small intestinal mucosa and peripheral blood of pediatric celiac disease patients. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 2012;84:175–184. doi: 10.1590/S0001-37652012000100018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dolfini E, et al. In vitro cytotoxic effect of bread wheat gliadin on the LoVo human adenocarcinoma cell line. Toxicol. In Vitro. 2002;16:331–337. doi: 10.1016/S0887-2333(02)00017-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dolfini E, et al. Damaging effects of gliadin on three-dimensional cell culture model. World J. Gastroenterol. 2005;11:5973–5977. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i38.5973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ferretti G, et al. Celiac disease, inflammation and oxidative damage: a nutrigenetic approach. Nutrients. 2012;4:243–257. doi: 10.3390/nu4040243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Murray IA, et al. Increased activity and expression of iNOS in human duodenal enterocytes from patients with celiac disease. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2002;283:G319–G326. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00324.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Beckett CG, et al. Gluten-induced nitric oxide and pro-inflammatory cytokine release by cultured coeliac small intestinal biopsies. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 1999;11:529–535. doi: 10.1097/00042737-199905000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Murray IA, Bullimore DW, Long RG. Fasting plasma nitric oxide products in coeliac disease. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2003;15:1091–1095. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200310000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ertekin V, et al. Serum nitric oxide levels in children with celiac disease. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2005;39:782–785. doi: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000177240.67215.da. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mrakic-Sposta S, et al. Assessment of a standardized ROS production profile in humans by electron paramagnetic resonance. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2012;2012:973927. doi: 10.1155/2012/973927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mrakic-Sposta S, et al. A quantitative method to monitor reactive oxygen species production by electron paramagnetic resonance in physiological and pathological conditions. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2014;2014:306179. doi: 10.1155/2014/306179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Elli L, et al. Histological evaluation of duodenal biopsies from coeliac patients: the need for different grading criteria during follow-up. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015;15:133. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0361-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Strapazzon G, et al. Oxidative stress response to acute hypobaric hypoxia and its association with indirect measurement of increased intracranial pressure: a field study. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:32426. doi: 10.1038/srep32426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dellanoce C, et al. Determination of different forms of aminothiols in red blood cells without washing erythrocytes. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2014;28:327–331. doi: 10.1002/bmc.3056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Esteve M, et al. Spectrum of gluten-sensitive enteropathy in first-degree relatives of patients with coeliac disease: clinical relevance of lymphocytic enteritis. Gut. 2006;55:1739–1745. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.095299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Odetti P, et al. Oxidative stress in subjects affected by celiac disease. Free Radic. Res. 1998;29:17–24. doi: 10.1080/10715769800300031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dugas B, et al. Wheat gliadin promotes the interleukin-4-induced IgE production by normal human peripheral mononuclear cells through a redox-dependent mechanism. Cytokine. 2003;21:270–280. doi: 10.1016/S1043-4666(03)00100-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rubio-Tapia A, et al. ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2013;108:656–676. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Elli L, et al. Does TMPRSS6 RS855791 polymorphism contribute to iron deficiency in treated celiac disease? Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2015;110:200–202. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rastogi T, et al. Cancer incidence rates among South Asians in four geographic regions: India, Singapore, UK and US. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2008;37:147–160. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pitek-Guziewicz A, et al. Alterations in serum levels of selected markers of oxidative imbalance in adult celiac patients with extraintestinal manifestations: a pilot study. Pol. Arch. Intern. Med. 2017;127:532–539. doi: 10.20452/pamw.4020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Boda M, Németh I, Boda D. The caffeine metabolic ratio as an index of xanthine oxidase activity in clinically active and silent celiac patients. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 1999;29:546–550. doi: 10.1097/00005176-199911000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Szaflarska-Poplawska A, et al. Oxidatively damaged DNA/oxidative stress in children with celiac disease. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:1960–1965. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Aw TY. Intestinal glutathione: determinant of mucosal peroxide transport, metabolism, and oxidative susceptibility. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2005;204:320–328. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2004.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mårtensson J, Jain A, Meister A. Glutathione is required for intestinal function. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1990;87:1715–1719. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.5.1715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rivabene R, Mancini E, De Vincenzi M. In vitro cytotoxic effect of wheat gliadin-derived peptides on the Caco-2 intestinal cell line is associated with intracellular oxidative imbalance: implications for coeliac disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1999;1453:152–160. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4439(98)00095-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ståhlberg MR, Hietanen E, Mäki M. Mucosal biotransformation rates in the small intestine of children. Gut. 1988;29:1058–1063. doi: 10.1136/gut.29.8.1058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ståhlberg MR, Hietanen E. Glutathione and glutathione-metabolizing enzymes in the erythrocytes of healthy children and in children with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, coeliac disease and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 1991;51:125–130. doi: 10.1080/00365519109091097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Vezzoli A, et al. Oxidative stress assessment in response to ultraendurance exercise: thiols redox status and ROS production according to duration of a competitive race. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016;2016:6439037. doi: 10.1155/2016/6439037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Stojiljković V, et al. Antioxidant enzymes, glutathione and lipid peroxidation in peripheral blood of children affected by coeliac disease. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 2007;44:537–543. doi: 10.1258/000456307782268075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lavy A, Ben Amotz A, Aviram M. Increased susceptibility to undergo lipid peroxidation of chylomicrons and low-density lipoprotein in celiac disease. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 1993;37:68–74. doi: 10.1159/000177752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wijeratne SS, Cuppett SL. Lipid hydroperoxide induced oxidative stress damage and antioxidant enzyme response in Caco-2 human colon cells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006;54:4476–4481. doi: 10.1021/jf060475v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Konturek SK, Konturek PC. Role of nitric oxide in the digestive system. Digestion. 1995;56:1–13. doi: 10.1159/000201214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Högberg L, et al. Children with screening-detected coeliac disease show increased levels of nitric oxide products in urine. Acta Paediatr. 2011;100:1023–1027. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02186.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.van Straaten EA, et al. Increased urinary nitric oxide oxidation products in children with active coeliac disease. Acta Paediatr. 1999;88:528–531. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1999.tb00169.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pérez S, et al. Redox signaling in the gastrointestinal tract. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2017;104:75–103. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.12.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure 1 (106.8KB, pdf)

Articles from Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology are provided here courtesy of American College of Gastroenterology

RESOURCES