Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2018 Jun 7;8:8737. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27096-8

First Report on High Entropy Alloy Nanoparticle Decorated Graphene

M Y Rekha 1, Nitin Mallik 1, Chandan Srivastava 1,✉
PMCID: PMC5992158  PMID: 29880871

Abstract

This is the first report on synthesis of multimetal high entropy alloy (HEA) nanoparticle-few layer graphene composite. A two-step methodology for synthesizing multi-component HEA nanoparticle-graphene composite is provided. In the first step, high purity graphite powder was mechanically milled with metal powders (Ni, Cr, Co, Cu, Fe) to produce multimetal-graphite composite. This composite was then sonicated with sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) for 2 hours to produce a dispersion of graphene decorated with multi-component nanoparticles with face centred cubic structure. Potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy methods revealed that the HEA nanoparticle graphene composite possess excellent corrosion resistance properties which was better than the corrosion resistance exhibited by milled and exfoliated graphene. The HEA nanoparticle-graphene composite can be used for corrosion resistant coating applications.

Introduction

Synthesis, characterization and investigation of properties of multi-component solids have gained considerable attention in the recent years. These multi-component alloys, also referred as high entropy alloys (HEAs), contain five or more component metal atoms in a single phase solid solution structure. The preference to form solid solution over intermetallic compounds between component metal atoms is essentially due to the high configurational entropy of the solid solution phase1–3. Several reports have illustrated the relevance of factors such as high configurational entropy, lattice distortion, sluggish diffusion and cocktail effect in high entropy alloys1–6. HEAs exhibit several useful properties such as high corrosion resistance, high wear resistance, high strength and excellent oxidation resistance7–12.

Graphene is a two-dimensional material composed of carbon atoms packed through sp2 hybridization13. Graphene has attracted significant attention due to its extraordinary mechanical14, thermal15, optical16 and electronic properties17. In addition to graphene, graphene based composites are now also being extensively produced and investigated due to their unique properties18. Common methods used for synthesizing graphene reinforced metal/polymer matrix composites are electrodeposition technique19,20 which involves dispersion of graphene in the electrolyte bath used for electrodeposition, powder metallurgy21,22 technique in which graphene is initially mixed with mechanically milled powder followed by compaction and sintering of the polymer/metal powder-graphene mixture, stir casting23 technique in which graphene is added into molten metal or polymer slurry under stirring condition followed by casting in a mold. Common methods used for synthesizing graphene based composites in which graphene forms the support over which nano-sized solids are attached are mechanical-milling24–28, solvothermal process29, hydrothermal process30,31, two-steps hydrothermal and solvothermal process32, polyol method33, sol-gel method34, pulsed laser ablation35, in-situ electrochemical polymerization method36, ex-situ method involving attachment of metallic nanoparticles to the surface of graphene sheets by covalent or non-covalent interactions37.

There is no report in the literature on the synthesis and characterization of graphene-multi-component HEA nanoparticle composites. Saiphaneendra et al.38 have used mechanical milling approach to synthesize multi-component deposits on the graphene surface. These multi-component deposits are however not nanoparticles. In another report, Singh et al.39 have illustrated a wet chemical synthesis based methodology to produce only isolated multi-component nanoparticles without graphene support. In another report, Lu et al.40 have provided solidification based methodology for synthesizing bulk HEA alloys with ultra-fine grain sizes but without graphene incorporation.

This report provides a methodology for synthesizing multi-component HEA nanoparticle-graphene composite using the mechanical milling and sonication assisted exfoliation approach. The multi-component nanoparticle system produced here is NiFeCrCoCu high entropy alloy. Corrosion properties of this composite was also evaluated in the present work.

Methods

In the present work, a two-step approach was used. In the first step, multimetal-graphite composite was produced and in the second step, this composite was subjected to sonication based exfoliation to produce multi-metal HEA nanoparticle decorated graphene.

Multimetal-graphite composite was produced by using the mechanical milling technique41. High purity graphite rods were initially grinded in mortar. 4 g of the graphite powder was then mixed with elemental blend of 0.193 g of iron, 0.180 g of chromium, 0.204 g of cobalt, 0.220 g of copper and 0.203 g of nickel powders. This mixture was then transferred to a hard chromium steel vial containing stainless steel balls. Ball-to-powder weight ratio was 20:1. Mechanical milling of this mixture was then done in toluene medium for 80 hours. After milling, the mixture was dispersed in a solution of 10 ml ethanol and 20 mg sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) followed by sonicated for 2 hrs for the exfoliation of graphene. After sonication, the dispersion was subjected to centrifugation at 8000 rpm in order to remove the SLS. The centrifuged powder was then dispersed in ethanol and allowed to settle for about 5–6 hrs. The resultant supernatant solution containing graphene-nanoparticle composite was then isolated.

X-pert pro X-ray diffractometer with a Cu Kα radiation source was used for x-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) (ESEM Quanta-200), with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) detector was used for imaging and elemental compositional analysis. UV-Visible absorption spectroscopic experiments were carried out in 700 to 200 nm wavelength range using Perkin Elmer (Lambda 35) UV-Vis Spectrometer. Raman spectrum were recorded using a setup (HORIBA JOBIN YVON, Lab RAM HR) consisting of Diode-pumped solid-state laser operating at 532 nm with a charge coupled detector. A 300 kV FEI TITAN transmission electron microscope (TEM) was used for imaging the samples and for obtaining selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns from them. Scanning transmission electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectroscopy (STEM-EDS) technique in TITAN TEM was used for compositional analysis of the samples. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) experiments were carried out at room temperature using a Nanosurf AFM instrument (Switzerland). Corrosion properties were measured using a conventional three electrode cell setup and a CHI 604 electrochemical workstation. The coated sample (produced by coating the mixture of HEA nanoparticle-graphene composite and Araldite epoxy over mild steel) of 1 cm2 exposed area, platinum foil and Ag/AgCl electrode were used as a working, counter/auxiliary and reference electrodes respectively.

Result and Discussion

SEM micrograph obtained using back scattered electrons from the multimetal-graphite composite after 80 hours of milling is shown in Fig. 1. In Fig. 1, the bright contrast represent the multimetal deposits whereas the dark contrast represents graphite. Figure 1 reveals a fairly uniform distribution of multimetal deposits in the metal-graphite mixture. SEM-EDS compositional analysis revealed the average composition of the multimetal deposits to be 17.14 ± 1.6 at% Fe, 18.59 ± 3.7 at% Cr, 25.83 ± 2.2 at% Co, 31.41 ± 2.8 at% Cu and 7.04 ± 1.1 at% Ni. X-ray diffraction (XRD) peak of the graphite phase obtained from as-mixed and 80 h milled sample is shown in Fig. 2. Considerable shift of the (002) graphite peak to lower 2-theta values reveal a large increase in the interplanar spacing. This indicated towards the incorporation of fine metal clusters within the spaces between the graphite planes during the mechanical milling operation. This was confirmed by TEM imaging of the milled graphite powder. Figure 3(a,b) respectively provides low and high magnification images of the stacked graphene layers (of the graphite) containing ultra-fine particles in the milled sample. Strain caused due to the presence of nanoparticles within the inter-layer spacing facilitated the exfoliation process during the subsequent sonication of the multimetal-graphite powder resulting in the formation of HEA nanoparticle decorated graphene.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

SEM back-scattered electron micrograph of 80 hours milled sample. Graphite (2) and multimetal clusters (1) are denoted by arrows in the SEM micrograph.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

X-ray diffraction (XRD) profiles, showing the graphite peak, obtained from as-mixed powder (zero hours milling) and powder sample milled for 80 h.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Representative (a) low and (b) high magnification TEM images of 80 h milled sample showing the stacked graphite layers containing nanoparticles.

The multimetal-graphite composite milled for 80 h was exfoliated using SLS. XRD profile of the exfoliated sample is given in Fig. 4(a). The XRD pattern shows broad diffraction peak at 23.4° 2-theta value and a sharp peak at 26.13° 2-theta value which reveal that the exfoliated sample contains graphene42. Raman spectrum obtained from the exfoliated sample is shown in Fig. 4(b). The Raman spectrum shows three characteristic graphene peaks: D band at ~1356 cm−1, G band at ~1582 cm−1 and 2D band at ~2702 cm−1 which corresponds to sp2 hybridized carbon atoms. UV-Visible absorption spectrum obtained from the exfoliated sample is provided in Fig. 4(c). In Fig. 4(c), the maximum absorption peak (λmax) around 270 nm wavelength which corresponds to the π-π* transition of the aromatic C-C bonds confirmed the presence of graphene in the exfoliated sample43. AFM topographical image of the exfoliated sample is shown in Fig. 4(d). Analysis of the Z-height profile from several AFM images of exfoliated samples revealed the average size of the multimetal nanoparticles and the thickness of the exfoliated graphene as 10.3 ± 2.4 nm and 3.3 ± 0.9 nm respectively. The Z-height profile analysis therefore confirmed the presence of nanoparticles and few layered graphene in the exfoliated sample.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) XRD profile, (b) Raman spectrum, (c) UV-Vis absorption spectrum obtained from exfoliated sample, (d) representative AFM topographical image of nanoparticle decorated graphene exfoliated sample. Exfoliated graphene (2) and multimetal clusters (1) are denoted by arrows.

Representative TEM bright field images of multi-component nanoparticle-graphene composite is provided in Fig. 5(a,b). Figure 5(a) reveals the presence of large graphene sheet with nanoparticles dispersed over it. Figure 5(b) shows nanoparticle-graphene composite in relatively higher magnification. Average size of the nanoparticles calculated from the summation average of sizes of individual nanoparticles was 8 ± 2 nm. The histogram revealing a large distribution in nanoparticle sizes is provided in Fig. 5(c). A representative SAED pattern obtained from graphene decorated with nanoparticles is provided in Fig. 5(d). Interplanar spacing values of the planes corresponding to the diffraction rings in the SAED pattern were calculated as r1 = 1.96 Å; r2 = 1.72 Å; r3 = 1.22 Å; r4 = 0.982 Å. Ratio of the d-spacing values (r1/r2 = 1.14; r1/r3 = 1.6; r1/r4 = 1.9; r2/r3 = 1.4; r2/r4 = 1.7; r3/r4 = 1.2) of the diffracting planes matched with the ratio of the d-spacing values of a standard face centred cubic crystal44. The lattice parameter of the fcc unit cell was calculated to be 3.394 Å. The SAED pattern did not show diffraction rings corresponding to pure metal phases or their oxides. The electron diffraction analysis therefore clearly revealed alloying of the five component metal atoms in the nanoparticles.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Representative (a) low and (b) higher magnification image of nanoparticle-graphene sample, (c) histogram showing the distribution of nanoparticle sizes and (d) SAED pattern obtained from nanoparticle agglomerate. The insert in (a) shows the larger graphene sheet from which the main image was obtained.

STEM-EDS technique was used for obtaining compositional maps and compositional line profiles. STEM-high angle annular dark field (STEM-HAADF) image of the region of interest (nanoparticles over a large graphene sheet), carbon map, Fe map, Cu map, Ni map, Co map and Cr map provided in Fig. 6 qualitatively shows that the nanoparticles formed over the graphene sheet contains all the five component metal atoms. A representative compositional mapping analysis result obtained from an individual nanoparticle is shown in Fig. 7. A representative compositional line profile analysis result obtained from a different nanoparticle is shown in Fig. 8. It can be observed in Figs 7 and 8 that all the component metal atoms are fairly uniformly distributed within the nanoparticle volume. To investigate the composition distribution between the nanoparticles, elemental composition of 35 individual nanoparticles were determined using the nano-sized electron probe in STEM. Histograms showing the distribution of the five component elements between the nanoparticles is provided in Fig. 9. Histograms in Fig. 9 reveal that all the nanoparticles contain all the five component element atoms however there exists a large distribution in the composition between the nanoparticles. Fe, Cu and Co histograms exhibit similarity in distribution of these elements, Cr histogram shows a relatively wider distribution character for this element and Ni histogram reveal that a large fraction of the nanoparticles contains Ni in the lowest amount among the five component elements.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Representative compositional mapping result obtained from the region of interest (nanoparticles over a large graphene sheet).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Representative compositional mapping result obtained from a nanoparticle.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Representative compositional line profile obtained from a nanoparticle.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

Histogram showing the distribution of five component elements between nanoparticles.

Corrosion properties of as-synthesized multi-component HEA nanoparticle-graphene composite (HEA-Gr) was investigated. HEA-Gr coating was produced by applying a mixture of HEA-Gr composite and araldite standard epoxy adhesive (resin hardener) over mild steel (MS) substrate. Weight ratio of composite to epoxy was 1:40. Corrosion parameters of this coating was compared with the corrosion parameters of bare MS substrate, araldite coated MS and coating (over MS) made by mixing araldite with 80 hours milled and exfoliated only graphene. Figure 10 shows the images of bare MS, epoxy coated MS, graphene-epoxy coated MS and HEA-Gr composite-epoxy coated MS substrate. The electrochemical corrosion analysis was conducted for these samples in 3.5% NaCl solution at room temperature. Tafel polarization or potentiodynamic polarization curves provided in Fig. 11 were measured by polarizing the working electrode (coated sample) to ±200 mV with respect to the open circuit potential (OCP) value at a scan rate of 1 mVs−1. The corrosion parameters Ecorr, Icorr and corrosion rate (CR) obtained are summarized in Table 1. It can be observed that the HEA-Gr composite-epoxy coating sample exhibits increased Ecorr value towards positive potential and decreased Icorr and CR values when compared to all other samples.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Open in a new tab

Images of bare mild-steel (MS), epoxy coated MS, graphene-epoxy coated MS and HEA Gr composite-epoxy coated MS substrate.

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Open in a new tab

Tafel polarization curves of mild-steel (MS), epoxy coated MS, graphene-epoxy coated MS and HEA Gr composite-epoxy coated MS substrate in 3.5% NaCl solution.

Table 1.

The corrosion parameters determined from the Tafel plots for mild-steel (MS), epoxy coated over MS, graphene-epoxy coated over MS and HEAs-np Gr composite-epoxy coated over MS substrate.

Sample Corrosion Parameters
Ecorr (V) Icorr (μA/cm2) Corrosion rate (mil/year/cm2)
Mid steel −0.634 13.76 246.1
Epoxy coating −0.582 7.34 137.9
Gr + epoxy coating −0.558 2.16 35.34
Gr:M (80:20) + epoxy coating −0.541 2.23 26.09
Open in a new tab

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were measured at the respective OCP values in the frequency range of 100 kHz to 0.01 Hz with the sinusoidal signal amplitude of 5 mV. The measured EIS data for bare MS, epoxy coated MS, graphene-epoxy coated MS and HEA-Gr composite-epoxy coated MS samples are shown in Fig. 12(a). The EIS plots show two capacitive loops indicating that the corrosion process involved two relaxation events for all the samples. The EIS data were curve fitted with electrical equivalent circuit (EEC) model (using Zsimp win 3.21 software) which is shown in Fig. 12(b). The capacitive element was replaced with a constant phase element (CPE) for better results. In the EEC model, Rs, Rcoat, Qcoat, Rct and Qdl are solution resistance, coating resistance, coating capacitance, charge transfer resistance and double layer capacitance respectively. The obtained corrosion parameters associated with EEC for all the samples are provided in Table 2. As observed in Fig. 12(a), the width of the capacitive loop, which is the measure of corrosion resistance or polarization resistance (Rp) varies significantly between the samples. Total Rp i.e. Rp = Rcoat + Rct was found to be 903.9 Ω, 1339 Ω, 5843 Ω and 19650 Ω for bare MS, epoxy coated MS, graphene-epoxy coated MS and HEA-Gr composite-epoxy coated MS substrate samples respectively. Maximum Rp value for HEA-Gr composite-epoxy coating represents maximum decrease in the surface activity towards corrosion environment in case of this sample when compared to graphene-epoxy coated, only epoxy coated and bare MS substrate samples. The corrosion parameters illustrate that the presence multi-component nanoparticles over graphene significantly enhances the corrosion resistance offered by only graphene coating. The as-synthesised HEA nanoparticle graphene composite can therefore be spray painted over surfaces to provide enhanced corrosion protection.

Figure 12.

Figure 12

Open in a new tab

(a) Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and (b) electrical equivalent circuit (EEC) model of mild-steel (MS), epoxy coated MS, graphene-epoxy coated MS and HEA-Gr composite-epoxy coated MS substrate in 3.5% NaCl solution.

Table 2.

Fitting results for the EIS data acquired from mild-steel (MS), epoxy coated over MS, graphene-epoxy coated over MS and HEAs-np Gr composite-epoxy coated over MS substrate in 3.5% NaCl solution.

Sample Rs (Ω cm2) Qcoat (μF cm−2) n (0 < n < 1) Rcoat (Ω cm2) Qdl (F cm−2) n (0 < n < 1) Rct (Ω cm2) χ2 square value
Mid steel 1.4 3014 0.93 92.16 225.9 0.8 811.8 3.07 × 10−3
Epoxy coating 7.5 539.7 0.8 94 107 0.8 1245 1.36 × 10−3
Gr + epoxy coating 28.6 0.738 0.86 2444 16.2 0.76 3399 2.21 × 10−3
Gr:M (80:20) + epoxy coating 35.2 0.017 0.9 3914 0.74 0.8 15736 1.1 × 10−3
Open in a new tab

Conclusion

A two-step method involving mechanical milling and sonication of the milled mixture in the presence of surfactant was used to produce multimetal (Ni, Fe, Cr, Co, Cu) nanoparticle decorated few layer graphene. Composition of the multimetal deposits over graphite after milling was found to be 17.14 ± 1.6 at% Fe, 18.59 ± 3.7 at% Cr, 25.83 ± 2.2 at% Co, 31.41 ± 2.8 at% Cu and 7.04 ± 1.1 at% Ni. This mixture was then dispersed in ethanol containing SLS surfactant. Sonication of this dispersion produced nanoparticle decorated graphene. The nanoparticles were face centred cubic structured. Compositional analysis at the single nanoparticle level revealed that all the five component metal atoms were distributed uniformly within the nanoparticles. A large distribution in composition between the nanoparticles was also observed. The as-synthesised HEA nanoparticle-graphene composite exhibited high corrosion resistance performance making then a suitable materials for corrosion protection application.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the electron microscopy facilities in the AFMM, IISc Bangalore. Research funding from SERB Govt. of India and DST Govt. of India is acknowledged.

Author Contributions

R.M.Y. conducted all materials characterization experiments and wrote the manuscript, N.M. did the ball milling experiment, C.S. contributed towards data analysis and writing of the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Tasi MH, Yeh JW. High-entropy alloys: Acritical review. Mater. Res. Lett. 2014;2(3):107–123. doi: 10.1080/21663831.2014.912690. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yeh JW, et al. Nanostructured high-entropy alloys with multiple principal elements: Novel alloy design concepts and outcomes. Adv.Eng.Mater. 2004;6(5):299–303. doi: 10.1002/adem.200300567. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cantor B. Multicomponent and high entropy alloys. Entropy. 2014;16(9):4749–4768. doi: 10.3390/e16094749. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Murty, B. S., Yeh, J. W. & Ranganathan, S. High Entropy Alloys 1st edn (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2014).
  • 5.Zhang Y, et al. Microstructures and properties of high-entropy alloys. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2014;61:1–93. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.10.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Miracle DB, et al. Exploration and development of high entropy alloys for structural applications. Entropy. 2014;16:494–525. doi: 10.3390/e16010494. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mary SJ, Nagalakshmi R, Rajendran S, Epshipha R. High entropy alloys and corrosion resistance-a bird’s eye view. Eur. Chem. Bull. 2014;3(12):1031–1035. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Qiu XW, Zhang YP, He L, Liu CG. Microstructure and corrosion resistance of AlCrFeCuCo high entropy alloy. J. Alloy. Compd. 2013;549(5):195–199. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.09.091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lu Y, et al. A promising new class of high-temperature alloys: eutectic high-entropy alloys. Sci. Rep. 2014;4(6200):1. doi: 10.1038/srep06200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wu JM, et al. Adhesive wear behaviour of AlxCoCrCuFeNi high-entropy alloys as a function of aluminium content. Wear. 2006;261:513–519. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2005.12.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Samal S, Mohanty S, Mishra AK, Biswas K, Govind B. Mater. Sci. Forum. 2014;790:503–508. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.790-791.503. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gludovatz B, et al. A fracture-resistant high-entropy alloy for cryogenic applications. Science. 2014;345:1153–1158. doi: 10.1126/science.1254581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Choi W, Lahiri I, Sheelaboyina R, Kang YS. Synthesis of Graphene and Its Applications: A Review. Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2010;35(1):52–71. doi: 10.1080/10408430903505036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Min K, Aluru NR. Mechanical properties of graphene under shear deformation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011;98(1):013113. doi: 10.1063/1.3534787. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pop E, Varshney V, Roy AK. Thermal properties of graphene: Fundamentals and applications. MRS Bull. 2012;37(12):1273–1281. doi: 10.1557/mrs.2012.203. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Falkovsky LA. Optical properties of graphene. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2008;129(1):012004. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Molitor F, Graf D, Stampfer C, Ihn T, Ensslin K. Raman Imaging and Electronic Properties of Graphene. Adv. in Solid State Phys. 2008;47:171–176. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-74325-5_14. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Huang X, Qi X, Boey F, Zhang H. Graphene-based composites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011;41(2):666–686. doi: 10.1039/C1CS15078B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pavithra CLP, Sarada BV, Rajulapati KV, Rao TN, Sundararajan G. Synthesis of copper-graphene nanocomposite foils with high hardness. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:4049. doi: 10.1038/srep04049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rusi & Majid SR. Green synthesis of in situ electrodeposited rGO/MnO2 nanocomposite for high energy density supercapacitors. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:16195. doi: 10.1038/srep16195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ayyappadas C, Muthuchamy A, Annamalai AR, Agrawal DK. An investigation on the effect of sintering mode on various properties of copper-graphene metal matrix composite. Adv. Powder. Technol. 2017;28:1760–1768. doi: 10.1016/j.apt.2017.04.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Garg P, Gupta P, Kumar D, Parkash O. Structural and Mechanical properties of graphene reinforced aluminum matrix composites. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2016;7(5):1461–1473. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rashad M, et al. High temperature formability of graphene nanoplatelets-AZ31 composites fabricated by stir-casting method. J. magnesium. Alloys. 2016;4:270–277. doi: 10.1016/j.jma.2016.11.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ashwath P, Xavior MA. The effect of ball milling & reinforcement percentage on sintered samples of aluminum alloy metal matrix composites. Procedia Eng. 2014;97:1027–1032. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.380. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yang S, et al. Mechanical ball-milling preparation of mass sandwich-like cobalt-graphene nanocomposites with high electrochemical hydrogen storage ability. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2013;1:6731–6735. doi: 10.1039/c3ta11263b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Saiphaneendra B, Srivastava C. Synthesis of graphene-magnetite nanoparticle composite using mechanical milling and electrochemical exfoliation. JOM. 2017;69(7):1143–1148. doi: 10.1007/s11837-016-2189-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Arora S, Srivastava C. Synthesis of ZnO nanocrystal-graphene composite by mechanical milling and sonication-assisted exfoliation. JOM. 2017;69(6):1021–1026. doi: 10.1007/s11837-017-2295-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bastwros M, et al. Effect of ball milling on graphene reinforced Al6061 composite fabricated by semi-solid sintering. Composites: Part B. 2014;60:111–118. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Santhosh C, et al. Removal of cationic and anionic heavy metals from water by 1D and 2D-carbon structures decorated with magnetic nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:14107. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14461-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yang Z, et al. Encapsulation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles into N, S co-doped graphene sheets with greatly enhanced electrochemical performance. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:27957. doi: 10.1038/srep27957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Luo X, et al. Adsorption of phosphate in water using one-step synthesized zirconium-loaded reduced graphene oxide. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:39108. doi: 10.1038/srep39108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang Y, et al. Desighned hybrid nanostructure with catalytic effect: beyond the theoretical capacity of SnO2 anode material for lithium ion batteries. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:9164. doi: 10.1038/srep09164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Neiva EGC, et al. One material, multiple functions: graphene/Ni(OH)2 thin films applied in batteries, electrochromism and sensors. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:33806. doi: 10.1038/srep33806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Liu X, et al. A general nonaqueous sol-gel route to g-C3N4-coupling photocatalysts: the case of Z-scheme g-C3N4/TiO2 with enhanced photodegradation toward RhB under visible-light. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:39531. doi: 10.1038/srep39531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mendieta RT, et al. In situ decoration of graphene sheets with gold nanoparticles synthesized by pulsed laser ablation liquids. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:30478. doi: 10.1038/srep30478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lim SP, et al. In-situ electrochemically deposited polypyrrole nanoparticles incorporated reduced graphene oxide as an efficient counter electrode for platinum-free dye-sensitized solar cells. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:5305. doi: 10.1038/srep05305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yin PT, Shah S, Chhowalla M, Lee KB. Design, synthesis, and characterization of graphene-nanoparticle hybrid materials for bioapplications. Chem. Rev. 2015;115(7):2483–2531. doi: 10.1021/cr500537t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Saiphaneendra B, Srivastava AK, Srivastava C. Synthesis of multimetal-graphene composite by mechanical milling. JOM. 2016;68(10):2574–2578. doi: 10.1007/s11837-016-1970-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Singh MP, Srivastava C. Synthesis and electron microscopy of high entropy alloy nanoparticles. Mater. Lett. 2015;160:419–422. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.08.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lu Y, et al. Preparing bulk ultrafine-microstructure high-entropy via direct solidification. Nanoscale. 2018;10:1912–1919. doi: 10.1039/C7NR07281C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Suryanarayana C. Mechanical alloying and milling. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2001;46:1–184. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6425(99)00010-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Punith Kumar MK, Nidhi M, Srivastava C. Electrochemical exfoliation of graphite to produce graphene using tetrasodium pyrophosphate. RSC Adv. 2015;5:24846–24852. doi: 10.1039/C5RA01304F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Alanyalioglu M, Segura JJ, Sole JO, Pastor NC. The synthesis of graphene sheets with controlled thickness and order using surfactant-assisted electrochemical processes. Carbon. 2012;50(1):142–152. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.07.064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Srivastava C. Phase separation by nanoparticle splitting. Mater. Lett. 2012;7:122–124. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.11.079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES