Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2018 Jun 7;8:8735. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27032-w

28-homobrassinolide regulates antioxidant enzyme activities and gene expression in response to salt- and temperature-induced oxidative stress in Brassica juncea

Harpreet Kaur 1,2, Geetika Sirhindi 1, Renu Bhardwaj 2, M N Alyemeni 3, Kadambot H M Siddique 4, Parvaiz Ahmad 3,5,
PMCID: PMC5992199  PMID: 29880861

Abstract

Brassinosteroids (BRs) are a group of naturally occurring plant steroid hormones that can induce plant tolerance to various plant stresses by regulating ROS production in cells, but the underlying mechanisms of this scavenging activity by BRs are not well understood. This study investigated the effects of 28-homobrassinolide (28-HBL) seed priming on Brassica juncea seedlings subjected to the combined stress of extreme temperatures (low, 4 °C or high, 44 °C) and salinity (180 mM), either alone or supplemented with 28-HBL treatments (0, 10−6, 10−9, 10−12 M). The combined temperature and salt stress treatments significantly reduced shoot and root lengths, but these improved when supplemented with 28-HBL although the response was dose-dependent. The combined stress alone significantly increased H2O2 content, but was inhibited when supplemented with 28-HBL. The activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APOX), glutathione reductase (GR), dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) and monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR) increased in response to 28-HBL. Overall, the 28-HBL seed priming treatment improved the plant’s potential to combat the toxic effects imposed by the combined temperature and salt stress by tightly regulating the accumulation of ROS, which was reflected in the improved redox state of antioxidants.

Introduction

Temperature is a major environmental factor that affects plant growth and development. As sessile organisms, plants must be able to sense transient fluctuations as well as seasonal changes in temperature and respond to these changes by actively adjusting their biology to fit the subsequent temperature regime1,2. Farmers use various chemical fertilizers to improve plant growth and development, but their imbalanced use can hinder the growth of plants under such stresses3. Extensive chemical use increases the accumulation of different ions in the soil and leads to ionic stress, which is further enhanced by extreme climatic changes, particularly temperature fluctuations. Individual as well as combined stress conditions can cause imbalances in the homeostasis of the cell due to the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide radical (O2−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and hydroxyl radical (OH). ROS cause membrane deterioration, lipid peroxidation and DNA modifications that lead to irreparable metabolic and structural dysfunction and end in cell death4. To cope with ROS and maintain redox homeostasis, plants have a well-integrated antioxidant defense system—made up of antioxidant molecules and enzymes such as superoxide dismutase, catalase and those involved in the ascorbate–glutathione (AsA–GSH) cycle4-to manage any stress5,6. The high efficiency of these antioxidant enzymes can alleviate oxidative damage under abiotic stress58.

The AsA–GSH cycle is the central player in the antioxidant system in plant cells, operating mainly in the chloroplasts, which helps to prevent oxidative damage9 and maintain the photosynthetic efficiency of plants under stress. Ascorbate plays a role in the detoxification of ROS by reducing H2O2 to water10, a reaction that is catalyzed by ascorbate peroxidase (APOX, EC 1.11.1.11) and the reaction also generates monodehydroascorbate radicals, which are further reduced by NADPH in a reaction catalyzed by monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR, EC 1.6.5.4)11. Monodehydroascorbate reductase radicals can spontaneously disproportionate to dehydroascorbate (DHA) and AsA12. The DHA reduction may occur via a non-enzymatic reaction with GSH or an enzymatic reaction with dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR, EC 1.8.5.1) to produce AsA13. Recycling of GSH is catalyzed by glutathione reductase (GR, EC 1.6.4.2), which reduces glutathione disulfide (GSSG) by using NADPH14. Maintaining high ratios of GSH/GSSG and AsA/DHA are important for temperature and salt tolerance14. The coordinated regulation of these enzymatic reactions with external cues as well as endogenous chemicals is necessary for plant management under abiotic stress and is inextricably linked with phytohormones15.

Brassinosteroids (BRs) are polyhydroxylated plant steroid hormones that play a crucial role in cell division, gene expression, protein synthesis, photosynthesis and stress responses in plants16,17. 28-homobrassinolide (28-HBL) can induce plant tolerance to a variety of abiotic stresses including high and low temperatures, drought and salinity5,1824. Serna, et al.22 analyzed the effects of BRs on alleviating salt stress in lettuce plants, where they were involved in the partial reversal of NaCl accumulation in plant cells. In Brassica juncea L., 28-HBL reduced the effects of salt stress by regulating photosynthetic efficiency and seed yield25. In Lycopersicum esculentum, BRs alleviated heat-induced inhibition of photosynthesis, increased carboxylation efficiency and enhanced the antioxidant system26,27. Brassinosteroids protect plants from germination to maturity by the up- and down-regulation of various non-enzymatic and enzymatic activities, including protein synthesis and accumulation, at the cellular level28 as well as the up-regulated expression of some components of translational machinery29. How 28-HBL interacts within plants during a combined stress of extreme temperature and salinity and how plants manage their physio-biochemical environment to combat the associated changes in cells, is unknown. The present study investigated the role of 28-HBL on growth and physio-biochemical processes in B. juncea by considering (i) the phenotypic performance of plants under combined stress of extreme temperature and salinity and the changes made by 28-HBL, (ii) the effect of the combined stress on cell viability and electrolyte leakage and their modifications by 28-HBL, (iii) 28-HBL inhibited H2O2 and MDA accumulation and (iv) the role of 28-HBL in altering antioxidant defense system components and the expression of stress tolerant genes. The study explored the impact of 28-HBL on growth, cell viability, electrolyte leakage, cellular activities of the antioxidant defense system and gene expression regulation in B. juncea L.to mitigate the toxic effects of combined stress of extreme temperature and salinity.

Materials and Methods

Plant material and treatments

Seeds of B. juncea L. cv. ‘RLC-1’ (certified) were obtained from the Department of Plant Breeding, Punjab Agriculture University, Ludhiana, India. Seeds were sterilized with 0.5% sodium hypochlorite for 15 minutes followed by 4–5 rinses in double-distilled water (DDW). The sterilized seeds were presoaked in various concentrations of 28-HBL (Control, 10−6,10−9, 10−12 M) for 8 h then germinated on autoclaved glass Petri dishes lined with Whatman No. 1 filter paper containing 0 or 180 mM NaCl salt for seven days. The 7-day-old seedlings were exposed to 4 °C or 44 °C temperature shocks for 5 h daily for three days. After the temperature shock treatments, the seedlings were transferred to a seed germinator in controlled laboratory conditions set at 24 °C, 16/8 h dark/light periods, uniform light fall on each Petri plate at 200 PAR and 70% humidity. The treatment details are as follows:

BR pre-soaking only: 0, 10−6, 10−9, 10−12 M (no salt or temp treatment)

Salt + BR: 180 mM + 0 M, 180 mM + 10−6 M, 180 mM + 10−9 M, 180 mM + 10−12 M (no temp treatment)

Low temp + BR pre-soak: 4 °C + 0 M, 4 °C + 10−6 M, 4 °C + 10−9 M, 4 °C + 10−12 M (no salt treatment)

High temp + BR pre-soak: 44 °C + 0 M, 44 °C + 10−6 M, 44 °C + 10−9 M, 44 °C + 10−12 M (no salt treatment)

Low temp + salt + BR pre-soak: 4 °C + 180 mM + 0 M, 4 °C + 180 mM + 10−6 M, 4 °C + 180 mM + 10−9 M, 4 °C + 180 mM + 10−12 M (salt and low temp treatment)

High temp + salt + BR pre-soak: 44 °C + 180 mM + 0 M, 44 °C + 180 mM + 10−6 M, 44 °C + 180 mM + 10−9 M, 44 °C + 180 mM + 10−12 M (salt and high temp treatment).

The low (4 °C) and high (44 °C) temperature treatments were selected based on the average temperature fluctuation from September to March in Punjab (India), being 2 °C ± 2 to 42 °C ± 2. We selected 4 °C and 44 °C after preliminary experiments on seed germination and initial seedling growth in B. juncea under controlled laboratory conditions.

To determine the sub-lethal concentration of NaCl, experiments were repeated five times under controlled conditions in a plant growth chamber; 180 mM NaCl was selected based on the IC50 (inhibition concentrations, where the growth of a plant remains 50%) for various morphological results of B. juncea L. cv. RLC-1 grown at 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180 and 200 mM NaCl.

Laboratory experiments were conducted five times under controlled conditions in a plant growth chamber to select the best concentration of 28-HBL for seedling growth and development in B. juncea L. cv. RLC-1. A concentrated stock solution of 28-HBL (10−4 M) was made, which was diluted to 10−6, 10−9 and 10−12 M for testing; 10−9 M 28-HBL was selected based on the results.

Growth measurement

Twenty seedlings from each treatment were sampled randomly on the 10th day for shoot and root lengths, measured with a ruler (cm).

Content of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and Malondialdehyde (MDA), Electrolyte leakage, Cell viability assay and Cell non-viability assay estimation

The procedure of Velikova, et al.30 was used to estimate H2O2 content using a standard curve of known concentrations and expressed as µg g−1 FW.

MDA content was determined according to the methods described by Heath and Packer31. One milliliter of extract was added to 2 mL of a reaction solution containing 20% (v/v) trichloroacetic acid and 0.5% (v/v) thiobarbituric acid. The solution was placed in a water bath at 95 °C for 30 minutes before transferring to an ice water bath. The solution was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes and the absorbance of the supernatant recorded at 532 and 600 nm.

The method of Lutts32 was used to estimate electrolyte leakage (EL). Electrical conductivity (L1) was recorded with a conductivity meter (PCS Testr35). The samples were then autoclaved at 120 °C for 20 minutes and electrical conductivity recorded (L2) after equilibration at 25 °C.

The method of Yang33 was used to determine cell viability in plant roots. Cell viability assays can be performed with fluorescein diacetate (FDA). Fluorescence was measured at 488–494 nm using a microscope (Nikon A1R Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope, Japan).

For the cell non-viability assay, the method of Truernit and Haseloff34 was used. Fluorescence was recorded at 535–617 nm using a confocal microscope (Nikon A1R Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope, Japan).

Enzyme assays

One gram of leaf material was harvested and crushed in a pre-chilled pestle and mortar using 3 mL of 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (PPB) (v/v) at pH 7.0. The crushed material was subjected to centrifugation using a cooling centrifuge for 20 minutes at 13,000 rpm at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected for total protein and various antioxidant enzyme analyses.

For total protein content, the method of Lowry, et al.35 was used. The optical density (OD) was recorded at 750 nm with a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV Mini 1240) using bovine serum albumin as a control.

Superoxide dismutase (EC 1.15.1.1) activity was estimated according to the method of Kono36, which is based on the principle of the inhibitory effect of SOD on the reduction of nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) dye by superoxide radicals, which are generated by auto-oxidation of hydroxylamine hydrochloride. The reaction mixture, containing 1.3 mL sodium carbonate buffer (w/v), 500 μL NBT (w/v) and 100 μL Triton X-100 (v/v), was added to the test cuvettes. The reaction was initiated by adding 100 μl (w/v) hydroxylamine hydrochloride. After 2 minutes, 70 μL of the enzyme extract was added. The percent inhibition at the rate of NBT reduction was recorded as an increase in absorbance at 540 nm.

Catalase (EC 1.11.1.6) activity was measured according to Aebi37 by taking 3 mL of reaction mixture containing 100 mM phosphate buffer (v/v) at pH 7.0, 150 mM H2O2 (v/v) and 100 µL enzyme extract. The reaction was started by adding H2O2. CAT activity was measured as the decrease in absorbance at 240 nm for 30 s. Enzyme activity was computed using an extinction coefficient of 6.93 × 10−3 mM cm−1.

Ascorbate peroxidase (EC 1.11.1.11) activity was measured following the method of Nakano and Asada38 by monitoring the rate of decrease in absorbance at 290 nm for 1 minute. The reaction mixture contained 50 mM phosphate buffer (w/v) at pH 7.0, 5.0 mM ascorbate (w/v), 1.0 mM H2O2 (v/v) and 100 µL enzyme extract. Enzyme activity was calculated using an extinction coefficient of 2.8 mM cm−1.

Glutathione reductase (EC 1.8.1.7) activity was measured according to Carlberg and Mannervik39. The reaction mixture contained 1.5 mL of 50 mM phosphate buffer (w/v) at pH 7.0, 3 mM EDTA (w/v), 0.1 mM NADPH (w/v), 1 mM GSSG (w/v) and 600 µL enzyme extract. GR activity was calculated using an extinction coefficient of 6.22 mM cm−1 for NADPH at 340 nm for 1 minute.

Monodehydroascorbate reductase (EC 1.6.5.4) activity was assayed at 25 °C according to Hossain, et al.40. The reaction mixture contained 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.6), 0.125% Triton X-100 (v/v), 0.2 mM NADH (w/v), 2.5 mM ascorbate (w/v), 5 mg ascorbate oxidase and 100 µl enzyme extract. The decrease in absorbance at 340 nm due to NADH H+ oxidation (E = 6.2 mM cm−1) was monitored.

Dehydroascorbate reductase (EC 1.8.5.1) activity was assayed at 25 °C according to Dalton, et al.41. The 3 mL reaction mixture was prepared by mixing 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 0.2 mM dehydroascorbate (w/v), 0.1 mM EDTA (w/v), 2.5 mM reduced glutathione (GSH) and 100 µl enzyme extract. DHAR activity was measured by following the increase in absorbance at 265 nm using an extinction coefficient of 14.0 mM cm−1.

The specific enzyme activity for all enzymes was expressed as unit mg−1 protein.

RNA isolation and quantitative real-time PCR (qRTPCR)

Total RNA was isolated from the leaves of stressed and control samples with a RaFlexTM solution as per the instructions (GeNei, India) and quantified spectrophotometrically. For real-time PCR, 5 µg of total RNA, 1 µl oligo (dT18) primer (0.5 µg µl−1) and 12 µl DEPC-treated water were used to make the first strand of cDNA using Revert AidTM RNAse H minus cDNA synthesis kit as per manufacturer’s instructions (Fermentas Life Sciences, USA). Other components included 200 u μl−1 Revert Aid TM M-MuLV Reverse Transcriptase, 20 u μl−1 RiboLockTM Ribonuclease Inhibitor, 100 µl 5 × Reaction Buffer, 10 mM dNTP, 0.5 µg µl−1 Oligo (dT)18 Primer and 0.5 µg µl−1 DEPC-treated water. Primers for real-time PCR were designed using MacVector 8.0 software (Table 1). The real-time PCR reaction was performed in a 20 µl reaction mixture containing diluted cDNA sample as a template and Power SYBR® Green PCR master mix and 200 nM each of forward and reverse gene specific primers (Sigma-Aldrich St. Louis, MO). The reaction was performed using Step OneTM real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) with the following program: 95 °C (90 s) [94 °C (30 s), 55 °C (30 s), 72 °C (30 s)] × 40 cycles. To normalize the variance in RNA quality and cDNA input, the β-actin gene was used as an internal control in each case42. The Ct values of samples in different RNA samples were normalized with Ct values of β-actin. The relative expression ratio under stress conditions was calculated on an unstressed sample using REST 2005 version 1.9.12 software43.

Table 1.

The sequence of forward and reverse primers size (20–25 bp) used in the gene expression analysis.

Sr. No. Enzyme Primer sequence
Forward 5′→3′ Reverse 3′→5′
1 SOD 5′GTCCACGCAGACCCTGATGT3' 3′GAAGACCAATAATACCGCAAGCA5'
2 APOX 5′CCGGTGAGAAGGAAGGTCTTC3′ 3′CTTCCTCGTCAGCAGCGTATT5′
3 CAT 5′CTGACCCCCGCATCACA3′ 3′ACGTTCAGACGGCTTGCAA5′
4 DHAR 5′CCAAAGGTGATGGGCTAAAGAG3′ 3′ACATTGTACTAAAAGAAAGCAAGAGAAAAG5′
5 MDHAR 5′CCCAAAGCTAGCAAGAAGTCAAC3′ 3′CTGTAGAGCGGCTTGAGCAA5′
6 GR 5′CACAGCAGCTGAGGAGTTTGTC3′ 3′GACAGCTGTTTTAGCCTCAAGACTT5′
7 Actin 5′GGATCTCGAAGGGAGAGTACGA3′ 3′TACCACACTCACCACCACGAA5′

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was executed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to scrutinize interactions of NaCl (180 mM), 28-HBL (10−6, 10−9, 10−12 M) and temperature (4 °C, 44 °C) and expressed as mean ± SE (n = 5). Tukey’s test (P ≤ 0.05) for the multiple comparisons using Graph Pad Prism version 5.04 was used to determine whether the means significantly differed from one another. The values represent the mean ± SE (n = 5). P values ≤ 0.05 represent significant differences.

Results

28-HBL inhibits dual stress of temperature and salinity by improving phenotypic expressions of B. juncea

The effect of 28-HBL on B. juncea L. growth is concentration dependent. Individual treatments of extreme temperatures of both low and high (4 °C, 44 °C) and salt (180 mM) decreased shoot lengths by 17.00, 33.00 and 17.00%, respectively, over the control seedlings of the same age. The 28-HBL primed seedlings tolerated extreme temperatures and salinity, when given either individually or in combination, better than untreated seedlings raised in DDW alone, as indicated by their enhanced cumulative shoot lengths (5.00 ± 0.01, 5.16 ± 0.16, 4.50 ± 0.02 vs. 3.83 ± 0.44 cm). Exogenous priming of 28-HBL treatments mitigate the negative effect of dual stress toxicity and 10−9 M treatment produced the longest shoots (5.16 ± 0.16 cm), with 34% record increase over untreated CN DDW (control treated with DDW only) seedlings (Fig. 1A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Effect of 28-HBL concentration (0, 10−6, 10−9, 10−12 M) on (A) shoot length and (B) root length of B. juncea L. under combinations of extreme temperature (4 °C, 44 °C) and NaCl salt (180 mM) stress in laboratory conditions. Different superscripted alphabetical letters within a column indicate significant differences from each other in all combinations (Tukey’s test, p ≤ 0.05).

The individual high- and low- temperature treatments reduced root length (RL) by 21% compared to CN DDW seedlings. The 180 mM NaCl further added 13.73% to the reduction in RL than the extreme temperature treatments, with the greatest reduction of 20.12% in CN DDW seedlings (Fig. 1B). The individual 28-HBL treatments enhanced RL the most in CN DDW seedlings. In all concentrations, root length increased by 5.16 ± 0.92 cm, 5.33 ± 0.44 cm and 4.83 ± 0.92 cm with 10−6 M, 10−9 M and 10−12 M 28-HBL, respectively.

Of the 28-HBL treatments, 10−9 M in control plants (without stress) produced the longest roots (5.33 ± 0.44 cm) which were 70% longer than the CN seedlings. This increase was much higher than the individual temperature- or salt-stressed seedlings. The ameliorative effect of 28-HBL in mitigating the stress effect on RL was observed in the combined treatments of 28-HBL and stress (temperature and/or salt). The best combination was 10−9 M 28-HBL + 4 °C + 180 mM NaCl where RL increased by 46% compared with the individual 4 °C treatment.

Effect of 28-HBL, temperature and salt on hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), lipid peroxidation (MDA) and electrolyte leakage (EL)

The hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content increased in 10-day-old B. juncea seedlings exposed to individual treatments of extreme temperature (4 °C or 44 °C) or salt (180 mM NaCl) (Fig. 2A). Supplementation with 28-HBL (10−6, 10−9 and 10−12) reduced H2O2 levels by 31, 31 and 22%, respectively, compared with CN DDW seedlings. In seedlings exposed to combined temperature and salt stress, 28-HBL supplementation reduced H2O2 contents further, by 46.43% and 45.13% with 10−9 M 28-HBL + 4 °C + salt compared to individual treatments with 4 °C and salt respectively.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effect of 28-HBL concentration (0, 10−6, 10−9, 10−12 M) on (A) hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content, (B) MDA (lipid peroxidation) content and (C) electrolyte leakage (EL%) of B. juncea L. under combinations of extreme temperature (4 °C, 44 °C) and NaCl salt (180 mM) stress in laboratory conditions. Different superscripted alphabetical letters within a column indicate significant differences from each other in all combinations (Tukey’s test, p ≤ 0.05).

Individual treatments of extreme temperature (4 °C or 44 °C) or salt (180 mM NaCl) increased MDA content (Fig. 2B), more so at 44 °C (93.31 ± 0.55), being double that of control plants (46.45 ± 0.47). Exogenous application of 28-HBL regulated MDA content, more so at 10−9 M (23.44 ± 0.76), being half that of the control plants. Of the combined stress treatments, the 10−9 M + 4 °C + 180 mM salt treatment produced the lowest MDA content (52.32 ± 0.59), being 64 and 58% less than the 10−9 M + 4 °C (81.97 ± 0.96) and 10−9 M + 180 mM NaCl (79.11 ± 0.43) treatments, respectively and 26 and 20% less than the individual 4 °C (81.97 ± 0.96) and 180 mM NaCl (79.11 ± 0.43) treatments, respectively.

The rate of electrolyte leakage increased in 10-day-old seedlings exposed to 4 °C (3.23 ± 0.31), 44 °C (3.27 ± 0.29) and 180 mM NaCl (3.56 ± 0.12) compared to the untreated seedlings (2.46 ± 0.10) (Fig. 2C). Supplementation with 28-HBL reduced the rate of EL and, in 10−9 M treatment at normal (25 °C) temperature, EL was 37% less (0.92 ± 0.23) than the control seedlings. Electrolyte leakage was more in stressed seedlings (4 °C, 44 °C and salt) than CN DDW seedlings while those presoaked in 28-HBL had little electrolyte leakage. The temperature and salt-treated seedlings presoaked with 28-HBL had less electrolyte leakage than individual temperature or salt treatments but not to the same extent as the individual 28-HBL treatments. The 10−9 M 28-HBL + 4 °C + 180 mM NaCl treatment had the largest reduction in EL (35%), relative to the CN DDW seedlings, which was 4% better than the individual 4 °C treatment and 9% better than the individual 180 mM NaCl treatment.

Effect of 28-HBL, temperature and salt on cell viability and non-viability assay

Intracellular viability in temperature- and salt-stressed B. juncea L. seedlings (Fig. 3A) was detected using fluorescein diacetate (FDA) which fluoresces green when it reacts with viable cells. The cell membrane is permeable to FDA so it can enter cells freely. Area of viable cells in B. juncea seedlings raised in temperature (4 °C or 44 °C) and/or salt (180 mM NaCl) alone or in dual stress treatment, enhanced oxidative damage resulted in reducing viability which was shown as decrease in green color intensity under a confocal microscope. The increase in green fluorescence in 10−9 M 28-HBL treated seedlings with or without temperature and salt stress suggests that 28-HBL has the potential to modulate oxidative stress in B. juncea L.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effect of 28-HBL concentration (0, 10−9 M) on plant (I) cell viability assay and (II) cell non-viability assay of B. juncea L. under combinations of extreme temperature (4 °C, 44 °C) and NaCl salt (180 mM) stress in laboratory conditions. (A) control, (B) 4 °C, (C) 44 °C, (D) 180 mM NaCl, (E) 10−9 M 28-HBL, (F) 10−9 M + 4 °C + 180 mM NaCl and (G) 10−9 M + 44 °C + 180 mM NaCl.

The different temperature and/or salt stress treatments enhanced oxidative stress many-fold, which resulted in cell membrane disintegration that rendered cells non-viable or caused cell death. In the confocal studies, extreme temperature (4 °C or 44 °C) and/or salt supplemented with 28-HBL reduced cell non-viability to varying extents, as indicated by the intensity of the red color in damaged cells (Fig. 3B). Supplementation with 10−9 M 28-HBL regulated cell damage more efficiently and (reduced color intensity) than those seedlings treated with alone stress treatments and presoaked only with DDW control.

Effect of 28-HBL, temperature and salt on total soluble protein content and antioxidant enzyme activities

Seedlings exposed to 4 °C, 44 °C and salt had 28, 43 and 33% less total soluble protein contents, respectively, than the control plants. The addition of 28-HBL to seedlings exposed to extreme temperature or salt stress reduced protein content less than those exposed to individual temperature or salt treatments (Fig. 4). Seedlings supplemented with 10−9 M 28-HBL enhanced soluble protein by 51% (4 °C + salt) and 40% (44 °C + salt) compared to the control.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Effect of 28-HBL concentration (0, 10−6, 10−9, 10−12 M) on total soluble protein content of B. juncea L. under combinations of extreme temperature (4 °C, 44 °C) and NaCl salt (180 mM) stress in laboratory conditions. Different superscripted alphabetical letters within a column indicate significant differences from each other in all combinations (Tukey’s test, p ≤ 0.05).

SOD activity in seedlings of B. juncea L. increased by 34, 72 and 44% after exposure to 4 °C, 44 °C and 180 mM NaCl salt, respectively, compared with the control seedlings (Table 2). The individual 28-HBL treatments did not significantly increase SOD activity compared to control seedlings. However, SOD activity increased in seedlings exposed to combined temperature and salt stress and supplemented with 28-HBL, more so with 10−9 M 28-HBL. The highest SOD activity occurred in the 10−9 M 28-HBL + 44 °C + salt treatment, being 216% higher than 44 °C alone and 244% higher than the salt only treatment.

Table 2.

Effect of 28-HBL concentrations (0, 10−6, 10−9, 10−12 M) on SOD, CAT and APOX activities of B. juncea L.

Treatments SOD activity (U min−1 mg−1 proteins) CAT activity (U min−1 mg−1 proteins) APOX activity (U min−1 mg−1 proteins)
Control
4 °C
44 °C
180 mM NaCl
10−6 M 28-HBL
10−9 M 28-HBL
10−12 M 28-HBL
10−6 M + 180 mM + 4 °C
10−6 M + 180 mM + 44 °C
10−9 M + 180 mM + 4 °C
10−9 M + 180 mM + 44 °C
10−12 M + 180 mM + 4 °C
10−12 M + 180 mM + 44 °C
24.67 ± 0.32j
32.98 ± 0.79h
39.83 ± 0.98f
36.36 ± 0.81g
30.56 ± 0.27i
32.68 ± 0.23h
30.37 ± 0.27i
71.32 ± 0.78c
80.05 ± 1.00b
80.90 ± 0.94b
94.28 ± 1.24a
46.64 ± 0.90e
52.84 ± 1.16d
26.43 ± 0.46g
38.00 ± 0.61d
43.56 ± 0.76c
39.03 ± 0.64d
36.76 ± 0.61de
36.66 ± 0.59de
29.66 ± 0.50f
47.13 ± 0.83bc
50.73 ± 0.95b
50.96 ± 1.04b
66.66 ± 1.53a
45.73 ± 0.64c
45.96 ± 0.67c
18.82 ± 0.40f
28.49 ± 0.28d
30.42 ± 0.32cd
29.52 ± 0.30d
26.49 ± 0.23e
27.71 ± 0.25de
27.14 ± 0.24e
33.31 ± 0.36c
34.03 ± 0.42c
36.13 ± 0.59b
45.62 ± 0.84a
31.51 ± 0.38d
33.49 ± 0.40c
F-ratio12×26 1100 188.67 80.45

Under combinations of extreme temperature (4 °C, 44 °C) and NaCl salt (180 mM) stress in laboratory conditions.

The data represented above are means ± S.E (n = 5). Different superscripted alphabetical letters within a column indicate significant differences from each other in all combinations (Tukey’s test, p ≤ 0.05).

Catalase (CAT) activity in seedlings of B. juncea L. increased by 43, 64 and 47% after exposure to 4 °C, 44 °C and salt, respectively, compared with control seedlings (Table 2). The individual 28-HBL treatments triggered CAT activity-but to a lesser extent than seedlings exposed to individual temperature or salt stress-increasing by 39, 38 and 12%, respectively, compared with the control seedlings. Seedlings exposed to combined temperature and salt stress treatments had the highest CAT activity. The best combination was 10−9 M 28-HBL + 44 °C + salt with a 152% increase in CAT activity, relative to the controls.

APOX activity in seedlings of B. juncea L. increased by 51, 61 and 56% after exposure to individual 4 °C, 44 °C and salt treatments, respectively, compared with the control seedlings (Table 2). The individual 28-HBL treatments increased APOX activity almost to the same level as the control seedlings. Seedlings exposed to combined temperature and salt stress with 28-HBL supplementation recorded increased APOX activity. The best combination was 10−9 M 28-HBL + 44 °C + salt with APOX activity being 81% higher than the individual 44 °C treatment and salt only treatment.

GR activity in seedlings of B. juncea L. increased by 87, 102 and 91% after exposure to individual 4 °C, 44 °C and salt treatments, respectively, compared with the control seedlings (Table 3). The individual 28-HBL treatments enhanced GR activity, but not to the same extent as the individual temperature or salt stresses. The best individual 28-HBL treatment was 10−9 M with a 52% increase in GR activity compared with the control. Seedlings exposed to combined temperature and salt stress with 28-HBL recorded the highest GR activities. The best combination was 10−9 M 28-HBL + 44 °C + salt where GR activity increased by 254%, compared with control seedlings, 152% relative to 44 °C alone and 163% relative to the salt only treatment.

Table 3.

Effect of 28-HBL concentrations (0, 10−6, 10−9, 10−12 M) on MDHAR, DHAR and GR activities of B. juncea L.

Treatments GR activity (U min−1 mg−1 proteins) MDHAR activity (U min−1 mg−1 proteins) DHAR activity (U min−1 mg−1 proteins)
Control
4 °C
44 °C
180 mM NaCl
10−6 M 28-HBL
10−9 M 28-HBL
10−12 M 28-HBL
10−6 M + 180 mM + 4 °C
10−6 M + 180 mM + 44 °C
10−9 M + 180 mM + 4 °C
10−9 M + 180 mM + 44 °C
10−12 M + 180 mM + 4 °C
10−12 M + 180 mM + 44 °C
24.23 ± 0.14l
45.21 ± 0.46h
48.98 ± 0.55g
46.20 ± 0.49h
29.56 ± 0.21j
36.91 ± 0.24i
28.40 ± 0.18k
64.97 ± 0.75d
68.66 ± 0.84c
72.31 ± 0.95b
85.43 ± 1.11a
53.00 ± 0.61f
62.32 ± 0.71de
23.04 ± 0.32e
29.12 ± 0.60c
33.31 ± 0.71b
30.35 ± 0.65c
26.58 ± 0.54d
27.17 ± 0.56cd
24.09 ± 0.36e
33.49 ± 0.72b
34.36 ± 0.75b
36.02 ± 0.80ab
38.50 ± 0.88a
28.74 ± 0.59cd
30.60 ± 0.67bc
9.34          ± 0.10j
14.37 ± 0.23f
17.31 ± 0.29d
15.71 ± 0.25e
12.08 ± 0.15h
13.59 ± 0.18fg
11.36 ± 0.14i
19.13 ± 0.34c
20.61 ± 0.36b
21.90 ± 1.39ab
24.10 ± 0.45a
18.31 ± 0.30cd
18.76 ± 0.32c
F-ratio12×26 417.4 60.58 49.20

Under combinations of extreme temperature (4 °C, 44 °C) and NaCl salt (180 mM) stress in laboratory conditions.

The data represented above are means ± S.E (n = 5). Different superscripted alphabetical letters within a column indicate significant differences from each other in all combinations (Tukey’s test, p ≤ 0.05).

Monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR) activity in seedlings of B. juncea L. increased by 26, 44 and 31% after exposure to individual 4 °C, 44 °C and salt treatments, respectively, compared with the control seedlings (Table 3). The individual 28-HBL treatments enhanced MDHAR activity, but not to the same extent as the individual temperature or salt stresses. The best individual 28-HBL treatment was 10−9 M with a 17% increase in MDHAR activity compared with the control. Seedlings exposed to combined temperature and salt stress with 28-HBL recorded the highest MDHAR activities. The best combination was 10−9 M 28-HBL + 44 °C + salt, where MDHAR activity increased by 67% relative to the control.

DHAR activity in seedlings of B. juncea L. increased by 53, 85 and 68% after exposure to individual 4 °C, 44 °C and salt treatments, respectively, compared with the control seedlings (Table 3). The individual 28-HBL treatments enhanced DHAR activity, but not to the same extent as the individual temperature or salt stresses. The best individual 28-HBL treatment was 10−9 M with a 45% increase in DHAR activity compared with the control. Seedlings exposed to combined temperature and salt stress with 28-HBL recorded the highest DHAR activities. The best combination was 10−9 M 28-HBL + 44 °C + salt, where DHAR activity increased by 157% relative to the 10−9 M 28-HBL only treatment.

Effect of 28-HBL, temperature and salt on antioxidant gene expression

SOD expression in seedlings of B. juncea L. increased by 28, 80 and 48% after exposure to individual 4 °C, 44 °C and salt treatments, respectively, compared with the control seedlings (Fig. 5A). The pre-treatment with 28-HBL further enhanced SOD expression by 188% with 10−9 M 28-HBL + 4 °C + salt and 130% with 10−9 M 28-HBL + 44 °C + salt, compared to the control.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Effect of 28-HBL concentration (0, 10−9 M) on (A) SOD, (B) CAT and (C) APOX genes (REU relative expression unit) of B. juncea L. under combinations of extreme temperature (4 °C, 44 °C) and NaCl salt (180 mM) stress in laboratory conditions. Different superscripted alphabetical letters within a column indicate significant differences from each other in all combinations (Tukey’s test, p ≤ 0.05).

CAT expression in seedlings of B. juncea L. was up-regulated by 85, 78 and 30% after exposure to individual 4 °C, 44 °C and salt treatments, respectively, compared with the control seedlings (Fig. 5B). The individual 10−9 M 28-HBL treatment increased CAT expression by 19%, which was further up-regulated by 174% and 247% with 4 °C + salt and 44 °C + salt, respectively, relative to the control.

APOX expression in seedlings of B. juncea L. was up-regulated by 89, 98 and 97% after exposure to individual 4 °C, 44 °C and salt treatments, respectively, compared with the control seedlings (Fig. 5C). The individual 10−9 M 28-HBL treatment increased APOX expression by 47%, which was further up-regulated by 173% and 142% with 4 °C + salt and 44 °C + salt, respectively, relative to the control.

DHAR expression in seedlings of B. juncea L. was up-regulated by 64, 82 and 72% after exposure to individual 4 °C, 44 °C and salt treatments, respectively, compared with the control seedlings (Fig. 6A). The individual 10−9 M 28-HBL treatment resulted in some re-regulation, which increased to 172% when additionally exposed to 44 °C + salt.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Effect of 28-HBL concentration (0, 10−9 M) on (A) DHAR, (B) MDHAR and (C) GR genes (REU relative expression unit) of B. juncea L. under combinations of extreme temperature (4 °C, 44 °C) and NaCl salt (180 mM) stress in laboratory conditions. Different superscripted alphabetical letters within a column indicate significant differences from each other in all combinations (Tukey’s test, p ≤ 0.05).

MDHAR expression was up-regulated by 54, 31 and 63% exposure to individual 4 °C, 44 °C and salt treatments, respectively, compared with the control seedlings. Supplementation with 10−9 M 28-HBL combined with 44 °C + salt resulted in 275% up-regulation of MDHAR expression (Fig. 6B).

GR expression in seedlings of B. juncea L. was up-regulated by 29, 23 and 53% after exposure to individual 4 °C, 44 °C and salt treatments, respectively, compared with the control seedlings (Fig. 6C). The individual 10−9 M 28-HBL treatment increased GR expression by 18%, which was further up-regulated by 122% with 4 °C + salt and 191% with 44 °C + salt.

Discussion

Extreme temperature and salt stress are major agricultural hazards that adversely affect crop production and may lead to imbalances in the antioxidant defense system and the amount of ROS, resulting in oxidative stress4. Plants have various defense mechanisms to react and acclimatize to extreme temperature and salt stress. The phytohormone brassinosteroid and its isoform 28-homobrassinolide can regulate the protective responses of plants; 28-homobrassinolide modifies antioxidant enzymes and non-enzymatic antioxidants under different stress conditions44,45. Exogenous application of 28-HBL is one method for improving temperature and salt tolerance in plants. Extreme temperature and salt stress reduced growth in B. juncea L. seedlings are supported by findings of Tajbakhsh, et al.46 in barley seeds and Smertenko, et al.47 in Nicotiana tabacum cells and in tall fescue48. Poor growth in plants exposed to extreme temperatures and salt is due to a reduced mitotic index, which affects overall plant growth49. In our study, the application of 28-HBL by pre-soaking seeds alleviated the detrimental effects of temperature and salt stress and increased plant growth, which supports the findings of Fariduddin, et al.18, Nassar50, Krasensky and Jonak51.

We attributed the poor growth performance of B. juncea seedlings under temperature and salt stress to the overproduction of ROS (O2− and H2O2), which caused oxidative damage to lipids and increased MDA content, %EL and H2O2 content. H2O2 has a dual role in plants-at low concentrations, it acts as a signal molecule, while at high concentrations, it leads to oxidative damage52. In our study, H2O2 increased with low- and high-temperature stress and salt stress, which agrees with a similar study on Triticum aestivum53. Detoxification of H2O2 by 28-HBL has been studied in B. juncea45 and Vigna radiata54. A major impact of oxidative stress is a perturbed function or complete dysfunction of cellular membranes, which can increase cell permeability and ion leakage. In our study, electrolyte leakage was more pronounced under temperature and salt stress, which has been observed elsewhere: low temperature55,56, high temperature57 and salt stress58. Lipid peroxidation is one of the criteria for determining the impact of extreme temperature and salt stress; MDA is the end product of this reaction and is commonly considered a signal of oxidative stress20,28,59. Similar to our findings, Ogweno, et al.26 reported that different 28-HBL concentrations reduced MDA content and H2O2 content in tomato plants exposed to 40/30 °C temperature stress. Liu, et al.60 reported that the BR treatment in Chorispora bungeana protected cells from chilling stress by inhibiting MDA formation. Arora, et al.61 observed the mitigation of lipid peroxidation in Zea mays with exogenous supply of 28-HBL. Furthermore, Li, et al.62 reported that the BR treatment decreased MDA content in Rubinia pseudoacacia seedlings. In our study on B. juncea, the application of 28-HBL minimized the production of H2O2 and other ROS, which directly affected membrane lipids and %EL. How 28-HBL reduces H2O2, MDA production and electrolyte leakage is unclear. It is possible that 28-HBL enhances the scavenging capacity of antioxidants that might lead to low H2O2 production and ultimately reduce lipid peroxidation and electrolyte leakage, or that 28-HBL induces other endogenous phytohormones to directly or indirectly impart tolerance to plants through low ROS production63.

The potential of 28-HBL for mitigating the detrimental effects of temperature and salt stress on cellular organization was assessed in a cell viability/non-viability assay. Propidium iodide (PI) is a nucleus staining dye, which cannot pass through a viable cell membrane in root tips of B. juncea L. PI reaches the nucleus by passing through disordered areas of dead cell membranes and intercalates with the DNA double helix to stain cells red64. In our results, root cells of B. juncea L. exposed to temperature and/or salt stress stained red unlike the control cells treated with distilled water. Another method for checking cell viability uses fluorescein diacetate (FDA) which stains fluorescent green65,66. As cell membranes are permeable to esterified forms of FDA, it can enter cells freely and become entrapped intracellularly. After hydrolysis in intracellular spaces, the non-florescent FDA is converted to the green fluorescent metabolite in Arabidopsis67. In our study, reductions in green fluorescence in B. juncea L. seedlings treated with 28-HBL with or without temperature or salt stress suggest that 28-HBL has the potential to modulate oxidative stress during growth and development under different stress environments.

Soluble proteins can decline under extreme temperature and salt stress68. In our study, 28-HBL enhanced protein contents, which agrees with the findings of Bajguz69 where dose-dependent amelioration increased DNA, RNA and soluble protein contents in Chlorella vulgaris. Brassinolide action can be regulated via the receptor/ligand complex which binds to nuclear or cytoplasmic sites to regulate the expression of specific genes70. 28-HBL has induced some heat shock granules and increased thermotolerance under heat shock71. It has been reported that plant growth is dependent upon the synthesis of nucleic acids and proteins through transcription and translation72.

Stress tolerance induced by 28-HBL is also associated with increased activities of SOD, CAT, APOX, DHAR, MDHAR, GR and their expression73. Thus, the present study hypothesized that detoxification pathways in treated seedlings consist of several metabolic processes including the activation of antioxidant machinery. The enhanced SOD and CAT activities might efficiently scavenge harmful ROS, as indicated by significantly reduced MDA contents in B. juncea and observed by Li, et al.62, Mahesh, et al.74 and Huang, et al.75. Indeed, SOD is the first line of protection against ROS, which catalyzes the superoxide radical (O2−) to O2 and H2O276. CAT is responsible for the conversion of H2O2, a potent and detrimental oxidizing agent, to H2O and oxygen77. Further, Talaat78 reported that the ascorbate–glutathione pathway comprises a vital pathway for ROS dissipation in plant tissues and the alleviation of oxidative damage under abiotic stress is responsible for this detoxification pathway. Extreme temperature and salt conditions increased the activities of APOX and GR when supplemented with 28-HBL and increased the activities of APOX, MDHAR and DHAR. Increases in antioxidant enzyme activities in almost equal values confront the oxidative stress and play a vital role in preventing lipid peroxidation and eliminating ROS production. Further, this increase in enzyme activity reflects the efficient maintenance of the ascorbate and glutathione pool required for efficient detoxification via the ascorbate–glutathione cycle. Several reports have indicated that BR application enhances antioxidant enzyme activity under various stresses17,79. The augmentation of antioxidant activities by BRs seems to be the result of activation and de novo synthesis of enzymes regulated through the transcription and/or translation of specific genes69, which has added the potential for temperature and salt-stressed plants to resist oxidative stress. In addition, exogenous 28-HBL application improves antioxidant enzyme functioning and activation under temperature and salt stress80. Huang, et al.75 reported that 28-HBL could be conjugated with antioxidative enzymes to stabilize and modulate the structure and activity of enzymes.

Extreme temperatures and salt will impact antioxidant activities; much of the research is based on quantitative analysis with few reports on gene expression81. The literature on antioxidant gene expression in plants under combined temperature and salt stress supplemented with 28-HBL is limited. Extreme temperature and salt stress enhanced expression of SOD in this study while CAT expression increased in response to temperature stress in tomato82. Kaur, et al.83 reported that 28-HBL up-regulated gene expression of APOX, CAT and SOD in B. juncea under salt stress. Ara, et al.84 suggested that antioxidant enzyme activities and gene expression are associated with heat tolerance in the stems and roots of Cucurbita. Our results are similar to those of Jubany-Marí, et al.85, where maintenance and improvement of the ascorbate and dehydroascorbate cycles suggest the involvement of antioxidant defense system genes in the tolerance mechanism. Our results revealed that B. juncea L. seedlings treated with 28-HBL could combat oxidative stress, which might govern their protection from temperature and salt stress.

Conclusion

The antioxidant system of B. juncea L. functioned at higher rates to prevent increased ROS formation under combined temperature and salt stress. This seemed evident in the evaluation of the extent of cellular damage, which was less remarkable when supplemented with 28-HBL. These results are in accordance with several studies conducted on different species, indicating that temperature and salt stress can induce the antioxidative system in B. juncea plants and that increased stress tolerance is correlated with decreasing oxidative injury.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Head, Department of Botany, Punjabi University Patiala and University Grants Commission, New Delhi for their assistance as Research Project No. 42-920-2013(SR) for experimentation. The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding this research group (RGP-199).

Author Contributions

Harpreet Kaur, Geetika Sirhindi, Renu Bhardwaj and Parvaiz Ahmad designed the experimental work and Harpreet Kaur and Geetika Sirhindi performed the experiments. Renu Bhardwaj and Parvaiz Ahmad analyzed the data and helped to write the introduction and discussion parts of the manuscript. M.N. Alyemeni and Kadambot H.M Siddique carried out the statistical analysis and revised the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Scaven VL, Rafferty NE. Physiological effects of climate warming on flowering plants and insect pollinators and potential consequences for their interactions. Current zoology. 2013;59:418–426. doi: 10.1093/czoolo/59.3.418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kaur H, Sirhindi G, Bhardwaj R. Influence of 28-homobrassinolide on photochemical efficiency in Brassica juncea under dual stress of extreme temperatures and salt. Canadian Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences. 2017;11:4205–4213. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yousaf M, et al. Effects of fertilization on crop production and nutrient-supplying capacity under rice-oilseed rape rotation system. Scientific reports. 2017;7:1270. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01412-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mittler R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2002;7:405–410. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02312-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ahmad P, et al. Modification of osmolytes and antioxidant enzymes by 24-epibrassinolide in chickpea seedlings under mercury (Hg) toxicity. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2018;37:309–322. doi: 10.1007/s00344-017-9730-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ahmad P, et al. Upregulation of antioxidant and glyoxalase systems mitigates NaCl stress in Brassica juncea by supplementation of zinc and calcium. Journal of Plant Interactions. 2018;13:151–162. doi: 10.1080/17429145.2018.1441452. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.DaCosta M, Huang B. Changes in antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation for bentgrass species in response to drought stress. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 2007;132:319–326. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang M, Zhai Z, Tian X, Duan L, Li Z. Brassinolide alleviated the adverse effect of water deficits on photosynthesis and the antioxidant of soybean (Glycine max L.) Plant Growth Regul. 2008;56:257–264. doi: 10.1007/s10725-008-9305-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Noctor G, Foyer CH. Ascorbate and glutathione: keeping active oxygen under control. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 1998;49:249–279. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Asada K. The water-water cycle in chloroplasts: scavenging of active oxygens and dissipation of excess photons. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 1999;50:601–639. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sano S, et al. Purification and cDNA Cloning of Chloroplastic Monodehydroascorbate Reductase from Spinach. Biosci., Biotechnol., Biochem. 2005;69:762–772. doi: 10.1271/bbb.69.762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Asada K. Production and Scavenging of Reactive Oxygen Species in Chloroplasts and Their Functions. Plant Physiol. 2006;141:391–396. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.082040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Foyer CH, Halliwell B. The presence of glutathione and glutathione reductase in chloroplasts: A proposed role in ascorbic acid metabolism. Planta. 1976;133:21–25. doi: 10.1007/BF00386001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Foyer CH, Noctor G. Ascorbate and glutathione: the heart of the redox hub. Plant Physiol. 2011;155:2–18. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.167569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pacifici E, Polverari L, Sabatini S. Plant hormone cross-talk: the pivot of root growth. Journal of experimental botany. 2015;66:1113–1121. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Krishna P. Brassinosteroid-Mediated Stress Responses. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2003;22:289–297. doi: 10.1007/s00344-003-0058-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Talaat NB, Shawky BT. 24-Epibrassinolide alleviates salt-induced inhibition of productivity by increasing nutrients and compatible solutes accumulation and enhancing antioxidant system in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Acta Physiol. Plant. 2012;35:729–740. doi: 10.1007/s11738-012-1113-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fariduddin Q, Yusuf M, Chalkoo S, Hayat S, Ahmad A. 28-homobrassinolide improves growth and photosynthesis in Cucumis sativus L. through an enhanced antioxidant system in the presence of chilling stress. Photosynthetica. 2011;49:55–64. doi: 10.1007/s11099-011-0022-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Janeczko A, Oklešťková J, Pociecha E, Kościelniak J, Mirek M. Physiological effects and transport of 24-epibrassinolide in heat-stressed barley. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2010;33:1249–1259. doi: 10.1007/s11738-010-0655-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kaur, H., Sirhindi, G., Bhardwaj, R., Sharma, P. & Mudasir, M. 28-homobrassinolide modulate antenna complexes and carbon skeleton of Brassica juncea L. under temperature stress. Journal of Stress Physiology & Biochemistry 10 (2014).
  • 21.Rattan A, Kapoor N, Bhardwaj R. Role of brassinosteroids in osmolytes accumulation under salinity stress in Zea mays plants. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2012;3:1822–1827. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Serna M, et al. A brassinosteroid analogue prevented the effect of salt stress on ethylene synthesis and polyamines in lettuce plants. Sci. Hort. 2015;185:105–112. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.01.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sharma, I., Kaur, N. & Pati, P. K. Brassinosteroids: a promising option in deciphering remedial strategies for abiotic stress tolerance in rice. Frontiers in plant science8 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 24.Sirhindi G, Kaur H, Bhardwaj R, Sharma P, Mushtaq R. 28-Homobrassinolide potential for oxidative interface in Brassica juncea under temperature stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2017;39:228. doi: 10.1007/s11738-017-2524-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Alyemeni MN, Hayat S, Wijaya L, Anaji A. Foliar application of 28-homobrassinolide mitigates salinity stress by increasing the efficiency of photosynthesis in Brassica juncea. Acta Botanica Brasilica. 2013;27:502–505. doi: 10.1590/S0102-33062013000300007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ogweno JO, et al. Brassinosteroids Alleviate Heat-Induced Inhibition of Photosynthesis by Increasing Carboxylation Efficiency and Enhancing Antioxidant Systems in Lycopersicon esculentum. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2007;27:49–57. doi: 10.1007/s00344-007-9030-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yadava P, Kaushal J, Gautam A, Parmar H, Singh I. Physiological and Biochemical Effects of 24-Epibrassinolide on Heat-Stress Adaptation in Maize (Zea mays L.) Natural Science. 2016;08:171–179. doi: 10.4236/ns.2016.84020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Geetika S, Harpreet K, Renu B, Spal KN, Poonam S. Thermo-Protective Role of 28-Homobrassinolide in Brassica juncea Plants. American Journal of Plant Sciences. 2014;05:2431–2439. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2014.515257. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dhaubhadel S, Browning KS, Gallie DR, Krishna P. Brassinosteroid functions to protect the translational machinery and heat-shock protein synthesis following thermal stress. Plant J. 2002;29:681–691. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01257.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Velikova V, Yordanov I, Edreva A. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants. Plant Sci. 2000;151:59–66. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(99)00197-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Heath RL, Packer L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 1968;125:189–198. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(68)90654-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lutts S. NaCl-induced Senescence in Leaves of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Cultivars Differing in Salinity Resistance. Ann. Bot. 1996;78:389–398. doi: 10.1006/anbo.1996.0134. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yang HY. Fluorescein diacetate used as a vital stain for labeling living pollen tubes. Plant Sci. 1986;44:59–63. doi: 10.1016/0168-9452(86)90169-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Truernit E, Haseloff J. A simple way to identify non-viable cells within living plant tissue using confocal microscopy. Plant Methods. 2008;4:15. doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-4-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951;193:265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kono Y. Generation of superoxide radical during autoxidation of hydroxylamine and an assay for superoxide dismutase. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 1978;186:189–195. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(78)90479-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Aebi, H. In Methods Enzymol. Vol. 105 (eds SP. Colowick & NO. Kaplan) 121–126 (Elsevier, 1984).
  • 38.Nakano Y, Asada K. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 1981;22:867–880. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Carlberg I, Mannervik B. Purification and characterization of the flavoenzyme glutathione reductase from rat liver. J. Biol. Chem. 1975;250:5475–5480. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hossain MA, Nakano Y, Asada K. Monodehydroascorbate reductase in spinach chloroplasts and its participation in regeneration of ascorbate for scavenging hydrogen peroxide. Plant Cell Physiol. 1984;25:385–395. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dalton DA, Russell SA, Hanus FJ, Pascoe GA, Evans HJ. Enzymatic reactions of ascorbate and glutathione that prevent peroxide damage in soybean root nodules. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1986;83:3811–3815. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.11.3811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jain M, Nijhawan A, Tyagi AK, Khurana JP. Validation of housekeeping genes as internal control for studying gene expression in rice by quantitative real-time PCR. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006;345:646–651. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.04.140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pfaffl MW. Relative expression software tool (REST(C)) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:36e–36. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.9.e36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sirhindi G, Kumar S, Bhardwaj R, Kumar M. Effects of 24-epibrassinolide and 28-homobrassinolide on the growth and antioxidant enzyme activities in the seedlings of Brassica juncea L. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants. 2009;15:335–341. doi: 10.1007/s12298-009-0038-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sharma N, Hundal GS, Sharma I, Bhardwaj R. 28-Homobrassinolide alters protein content and activities of glutathione-S-transferase and polyphenol oxidase in Raphanus sativus L. plants under heavy metal stress. Toxicol. Int. 2014;21:44. doi: 10.4103/0971-6580.128792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tajbakhsh M, Zhou MX, Chen ZH, Mendham NJ. Physiological and cytological response of salt-tolerant and non-tolerant barley to salinity during germination and early growth. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 2006;46:555. doi: 10.1071/EA05026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Smertenko A, Draber P, Viklicky V, Opatrny Z. Heat stress affects the organization of microtubules and cell division in Nicotiana tabacum cells. Plant, Cell and Environment. 1997;20:1534–1542. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-44.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Alam MN, et al. Transcriptomic profiling of tall fescue in response to heat stress and improved thermotolerance by melatonin and 24-epibrassinolide. BMC Genomics. 2018;19:224. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4588-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tabur S, Demir K. Cytogenetic response of 24-epibrassinolide on the root meristem cells of barley seeds under salinity. Plant Growth Regul. 2009;58:119–123. doi: 10.1007/s10725-008-9357-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Nassar A. Effect of homobrassinolide on in vitro growth of apical meristems and heat tolerance of banana shoots. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 2004;6:771–776. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Krasensky J, Jonak C. Drought, salt and temperature stress-induced metabolic rearrangements and regulatory networks. J. Exp. Bot. 2012;63:1593–1608. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Quan L-J, Zhang B, Shi W-W, Li H-Y. Hydrogen Peroxide in Plants: a Versatile Molecule of the Reactive Oxygen Species Network. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 2008;50:2–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2007.00599.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Okuda T, Matsuda Y, Yamanaka A, Sagisaka S. Abrupt Increase in the Level of Hydrogen Peroxide in Leaves of Winter Wheat Is Caused by Cold Treatment. Plant Physiol. 1991;97:1265–1267. doi: 10.1104/pp.97.3.1265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Fariduddin Q, Khan TA, Yusuf M. Hydrogen peroxide mediated tolerance to copper stress in the presence of 28-homobrassinolide in Vigna radiata. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2014;36:2767–2778. doi: 10.1007/s11738-014-1647-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Tamura A. Evaluation of Freezing Tolerance of Whole Plants in Komatsuna(Brassica campestris L.) and Spinach(Spinacia oleracea L.) Engei Gakkai zasshi. 2000;69:332–338. doi: 10.2503/jjshs.69.332. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Väinölä A, Repo T. Impedance spectroscopy in frost hardiness evaluation of Rhododendron leaves. Ann. Bot. 2000;86:799–805. doi: 10.1006/anbo.2000.1237. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Saelim S, Zwiazek JJ. Preservation of Thermal Stability of Cell Membranes and Gas Exchange in High Temperature Acclimated Xylia xylocarpa Seedlings. J. Plant Physiol. 2000;156:380–385. doi: 10.1016/S0176-1617(00)80077-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chen C, Tao C, Peng H, Ding Y. Genetic Analysis of Salt Stress Responses in Asparagus Bean (Vigna unguiculata (L.) ssp. sesquipedalis Verdc.) J. Hered. 2007;98:655–665. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esm084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ahmad, P. et al. Role of Trichoderma harzianum in mitigating NaCl stress in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L) through antioxidative defense system. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 10.3389/fpls.2015.00868 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 60.Liu Y, et al. Brassinosteroids alleviate chilling-induced oxidative damage by enhancing antioxidant defense system in suspension cultured cells of Chorispora bungeana. Plant Growth Regul. 2009;59:207–214. doi: 10.1007/s10725-009-9405-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Arora N, Bhardwaj R, Sharma P, Arora HK. Effects of 28-homobrassinolide on growth, lipid peroxidation and antioxidative enzyme activities in seedlings of Zea mays L. under salinity stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2008;30:833–839. doi: 10.1007/s11738-008-0188-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Li K, Wang H, Han G, Wang Q, Fan J. Effects of brassinolide on the survival, growth and drought resistance of Robinia pseudoacacia seedlings under water-stress. New Forests. 2008;35:255–266. doi: 10.1007/s11056-007-9075-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Bajguz A, Hayat S. Effects of brassinosteroids on the plant responses to environmental stresses. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2009;47:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2008.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ogawa D, et al. RSS1 regulates the cell cycle and maintains meristematic activity under stress conditions in rice. Nature Communications. 2011;2:278. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Dong J, Bowra S, Vincze E. The development and evaluation of single cell suspension from wheat and barley as a model system; a first step towards functional genomics application. BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10:239. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Jones KH, Senft JA. An improved method to determine cell viability by simultaneous staining with fluorescein diacetate-propidium iodide. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. 1985;33:77–79. doi: 10.1177/33.1.2578146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Grubb DC, et al. Arabidopsis glucosyltransferase UGT74B1 functions in glucosinolate biosynthesis and auxin homeostasis. Plant J. 2004;40:893–908. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02261.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Babu NR, Devaraj V. High temperature and salt stress response in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2008;2:40–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bajguz A. Effect of brassinosteroids on nucleic acids and protein content in cultured cells of Chlorella vulgaris. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2000;38:209–215. doi: 10.1016/S0981-9428(00)00733-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Clouse SD. Brassinosteroid Signal Transduction: From Receptor Kinase Activation to Transcriptional Networks Regulating Plant Development. The Plant Cell. 2011;23:1219–1230. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.084475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kulaeva, O. N. et al. In ACS Symposium Series 141-155 (American Chemical Society, 1991).
  • 72.Zurek DM, Clouse SD. Molecular Cloning and Characterization of a Brassinosteroid-Regulated Gene from Elongating Soybean (Glycine max L.) Epicotyls. Plant Physiol. 1994;104:161–170. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.1.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Vardhini BV, Anjum NA. Brassinosteroids make plant life easier under abiotic stresses mainly by modulating major components of antioxidant defense system. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2015;2:67. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2014.00067. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mahesh K, Balaraju P, Ramakrishna B, Ram Rao SS. Effect of Brassinosteroids on Germination and Seedling Growth of Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) under PEG-6000 Induced WaterStress. American Journal of Plant Sciences. 2013;04:2305–2313. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2013.412285. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Huang X, et al. Drought-inhibited ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase activity is mediated through increased release of ethylene and changes in the ratio of polyamines in pakchoi. J. Plant Physiol. 2014;171:1392–1400. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Alscher RG, Erturk N, Heath LS. Role of superoxide dismutases (SODs) in controlling oxidative stress in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2002;53:1331–1341. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/53.372.1331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Asada K. Ascorbate peroxidase - a hydrogen peroxide-scavenging enzyme in plants. Physiol. Plant. 1992;85:235–241. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1992.tb04728.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Talaat NB. Effective microorganisms enhance the scavenging capacity of the ascorbate–glutathione cycle in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants grown in salty soils. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2014;80:136–143. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.03.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Behnamnia M, Kalantari KM, Rezanejad F. Exogenous application of brassinosteroid alleviates drought induced oxidative stress in Lycopersicon esculentum. General and Applied Plant Physiology. 2009;35:22–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kubiś J. Exogenous spermidine differentially alters activities of some scavenging system enzymes, H2O2 and superoxide radical levels in water-stressed cucumber leaves. J. Plant Physiol. 2008;165:397–406. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2007.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Bernard F, et al. Antioxidant responses of Annelids, Brassicaceae and Fabaceae to pollutants: A review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015;114:273–303. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.04.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Mazorra LM, Nunez M, Hechavarria M, Coll F, Sánchez-Blanco MJ. Influence of brassinosteroids on antioxidant enzymes activity in tomato under different temperatures. Biol. Plant. 2002;45:593–596. doi: 10.1023/A:1022390917656. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kaur H, Sirhindi G, Bhardwaj R. Alteration of antioxidant machinery by 28-homobrassinolide in Brassica juncea L. under salt stress. Advances in Applied Science Research. 2015;6:166–172. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ara N, et al. Antioxidant enzymatic activities and gene expression associated with heat tolerance in the stems and roots of two cucurbit species (“Cucurbita maxima” and “Cucurbita moschata”) and their interspecific inbred line “Maxchata”. International journal of molecular sciences. 2013;14:24008–24028. doi: 10.3390/ijms141224008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Jubany-Marí T, Munné-Bosch S, Alegre L. Redox regulation of water stress responses in field-grown plants. Role of hydrogen peroxide and ascorbate. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010;48:351–358. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES