Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2018 Jun 7;8:8714. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26770-1

Element substitution of kesterite Cu2ZnSnS4 for efficient counter electrode of dye-sensitized solar cells

Shuang Lu 1, Huanying Yang 1, Fei Li 1, Yinglin Wang 1,, Shixin Chen 1, Guochun Yang 1, Yichun Liu 1, Xintong Zhang 1,
PMCID: PMC5992223  PMID: 29880870

Abstract

Development of cost-effective counter electrode (CE) materials is a key issue for practical applications of photoelectrochemical solar energy conversion. Kesterite Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) has been recognized as a potential CE material, but its electrocatalytic activity is still insufficient for the recovery of I/I3 electrolyte in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Herein, we attempt to enhance the electrocatalytic activity of kesterite CZTS through element substitution of Zn2+ by Co2+ and Ni2+ cations, considering their high catalytic activity, as well as their similar atomic radius and electron configuration with Zn2+. The Cu2CoSnS4 (CCTS) and Cu2NiSnS4 (CNTS) CEs exhibit smaller charge-transfer resistance and reasonable power conversion efficiency (PCE) (CCTS, 8.3%; CNTS, 8.2%), comparable to that of Pt (8.3%). In contrast, the CZTS-based DSSCs only generate a PCE of 7.9%. Density functional theory calculation indicate that the enhanced catalytic performance is associated to the adsorption and desorption energy of iodine atom on the Co2+ and Ni2+. In addition, the stability of CCTS and CNTS CEs toward electrolyte is also significantly improved as evidenced by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy characterizations. These results thus suggest the effectiveness of the element substitution strategy for developing high-performance CE from the developed materials, particularly for multicomponent compounds.

Introduction

High-efficiency, good-stability and low-cost counter electrodes (CEs) are essential for photoelectrochemical solar energy conversion. As a key component of the photoelectrochemical solar cells, the CEs need to possess good conductivity and high catalytic activity for the efficient recovery of redox. Up to now, Pt is the most widely applied CE active materials for dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs)1,2. However, the high cost of Pt-based materials limits their further development. Numerous candidates are exploited to replace the expensive Pt, such as metals and alloys3, carbon materials4,5, conductive polymer6,7, transition metal compounds810 and composites11,12. Among them, the transition metal compounds (TMCs) attract much attention because of their Pt-like catalytic activity1319. Various binary TMC CEs are wildly investigated, however the study of multicomponent TMC CEs is still limited despite they have many advantages, such as material diversity and multiple activity sites19.

Recently, kesterite Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS), a quaternary transition metal sulfide, is considered to be a promising photo- and electro-catalyst due to its tunable band gap (1.0–1.5 eV), high abundance and nontoxicity2029. After optimizing composition and morphology of CZTS CE, the efficiency of DSSCs was reported in the range from ~4% to 9%. But, the catalytic activity of CZTS is still limited, due to its fully-filled d orbitals of metallic active sites (Zn2+ and Sn4+)30. Thus, it is reasonable to suppose that the substitution of Zn2+ or Sn4+ by more active metal ions would enhance the activity of CZTS CE. Co2+ and Ni2+ are high-activity catalytic sites in various photo- and electro-catalysts3138. Series of highly efficient CE materials based on Co2+ and Ni2+ have been exploited, including carbides39, nitrides40, chalcogenides41,42 and oxides43. Furthermore, these two divalent metal ions present similar atomic radius and electron configuration with Zn2+, thus substituting Zn2+ by Co2+ or Ni2+ may improve the catalytic activity of CZTS.

Herein, we investigate the effect of element substitution on improving the electrocatalytic activity of kesterite CZTS CEs. We prepare kesterite Cu2XSnS4 (X = Zn, Co, Ni) CEs by simple spin-coating method. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) tests indicate that the Cu2CoSnS4 (CCTS) and Cu2NiSnS4 (CNTS) CEs possess decreased change-transfer resistance and improved stability toward iodide electrolyte. CCTS- and CNTS-based DSSCs exhibit enhanced efficiency (8.3% and 8.2%) compared with that of CZTS (7.9%), which is comparable with traditional Pt (8.3%). In addition, the highly-effective catalytic activity is related to the adsorption and desorption energy of iodine (I) atom calculated by the density functional theory4447.

Results and Discussion

Structure and morphology characterizations

We prepared porous CXTS films by spin-coating precursor solutions based on water and ethanol mixed solvent and annealing them in N2 atmosphere at 540 °C for 15 minutes48. To avoid the signals interference of FTO (SnO2: F) to CXTS films, we recorded X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns and Raman spectra through CXTS films on quartz prepared by the same method. The diffraction peaks at 28.53°, 47.33°, and 56.18° were indexed to (112), (220), and (312) planes respectively, which were in good agreement with those of previously reported kesterite CZTS4850 (Fig. 1(a)). This measurement indicated that the element substitution did not change the crystal structure of CZTS. Furthermore, three peaks at 288, 336 and 372 cm−1 were observed in the Raman spectra (Fig. 1(b)) of CZTS, which were indexed to CZTS materials. The CCTS and CNTS spectra showed peaks at 288, 325 and 350 cm−1, which were observed in the CCTS and CNTS materials of previous literatures5154. In addition, we used Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) to analyze the composition of CXTS films (Fig. S1(a–c) in the Supplementary Information). The elemental composition ratio was 1.8:1:1.3:4.7, 1.5:1:1.3:4.4 and 1.5:1:1.1:4, respectively. These results indicated that the CXTS CEs was successfully synthesized. In addition, CXTS CEs showed above 75% transmittance in the range of visible wavelengths as shown in the UV-Vis spectra of Fig. 1(c).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(ac) XRD patterns, Raman and UV-Vis spectra and (df) top-view SEM images of CXTS films prepared by H2O/ethanol precursor solutions. The films of XRD and Raman measurements were prepared on quartz.

Figure 1(d–f) exhibited the top-view scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the CXTS films. It was obvious that the CXTS films showed a porous structure, which was beneficial to the high catalytic activity because of the high specific surface area55. The Atomic force microscope (AFM) measurements also showed similar morphology (see Fig. S1(d–f) in the Supplementary Information). We performed step profiler test to accurately measure the thickness of CXTS films. The thickness of CZTS, CCTS and CNTS CEs were calculated to be 189 ± 13 nm, 125 ± 3 nm and 148 ± 27 nm, respectively, from nine measure points. The thickness of CXTS films was carefully optimized by spin-coating 1 layer of precursor solution (see Fig. S2 in the Supplementary Information) providing enough active sites and reduced bulk resistance.

Electrochemical characterization

To investigate the electrocatalytic activity of kesterite CXTS CEs for reducing iodide electrolyte, we performed Tafel polarization measurements with the symmetrical structure (CE//electrolyte//CE). The exchange current density (J0) of CEs could be acquired from the intercept of a tangent to Tafel polarization curves (Tafel), the variation of which could be inverse with the charge-transfer resistance (Rct) values fitted from EIS through eq. 1:

J0=RTnFRct 1

where R is the gas constant, T is the temperature, F is Faraday’s constant and n is the electron number involved in the electrochemical reduction of triiodides at the electrode56. As shown in Fig. 2(a), the anodic and cathodic branches of CCTS- and CNTS-Tafel curves exhibited larger slopes than those of CZTS, revealing a higher J0 and more efficient catalytic activity of CCTS and CNTS CEs for reducing triiodides. In addition, we also prepared Cu2MnSnS4 and Cu2FeSnS4 CEs by similar method. However, their performance was poor because of the bad activity and unstable chemical property of these two films.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) Tafel curves and (b) EIS plots of Pt and CXTS CEs. Both Tafel and EIS experiments were performed with the symmetrical dummy cells with two identical electrodes (CE//iodide electrolyte//CE). Inset in a and b show the original Tafel curves and the equivalent circuit model of the symmetrical cells for fitting EIS results. (c) JV curves of DSSCs based on Pt and CXTS CEs, measured under AM 1.5 G solar simulator illumination (100 mW cm−2).

The EIS test was used to further evaluate the catalytic activity of CXTS CEs. The left arcs of EIS spectra in Fig. 2(b) reflects the Rct and series resistance (Rs) whose exact values are obtained by fitting the equivalent circuit in the inset of Fig. 2(b). As shown in Table 1, the Rct values were reduced after substituting Zn2+ by Co2+ and Ni2+ ions (CCTS, 5.3 Ω; CNTS, 5.5 Ω; CZTS, 6.5 Ω), which was consistent with the variation of J0 values in Fig. 2(a). In addition, the Rs values of CCTS and CNTS CEs were close to that of CZTS, indicated their similar electron transport ability. Thus, the variation of Rct led to the enhancement of the catalytic activity of CCTS and CNTS CEs, compared with CZTS. This catalytic activity trend was also observed on dense CXTS films prepared by spin-coating the dimethyl sulphoxide-based precursor solution (see Fig. S3 in the Supplementary Information). All the electrochemical data suggested that the substitution of Zn2+ by Co2+ and Ni2+ effectively improved the electrocatalytic activity of kesterite CZTS CEs for reducing triiodides.

Table 1.

Electrochemical parameters of EIS plots with Pt and CXTS CEs and photovoltaic parameters obtained from DSSCs with Pt and CXTS CEs.

CE Rs (Ω) Rct (Ω) Jsc (mA cm−2) Voc (V) FF PCE (%)
Pt 12.4 5.9 16.80 0.68 0.73 8.3
CZTS 13.1 6.5 16.05 0.67 0.73 7.9
CCTS 12.9 5.3 16.79 0.68 0.72 8.3
CNTS 12.9 5.5 16.74 0.67 0.73 8.2

Photovoltaic performance of DSSCs

The current density-voltage (JV) curves of DSSCs containing Pt or CXTS CEs and N719-sensitized TiO2 photoanode in iodide electrolyte were shown in Fig. 2(c). Table 1 summarizes the resultant photovoltaic parameters. The CCTS- and CNTS-based DSSCs revealed comparable power conversion efficiency (PCE) (8.3% and 8.2%, respectively) with that of Pt-based DSSC (8.3%), which were derived from the short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 16.79 and 16.74 mA cm−2, open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.68 V and 0.67 V, and fill factor (FF) of 0.72 and 0.73. The CCTS and CNTS cells exhibit a higher Jsc and PCE than that of CZTS (Jsc, 16.05 mA cm−2; PCE, 7.9%) owing to the higher activity of the CCTS and CNTS CEs. In addition, photovoltaic parameters of five parallel CXTS-based DSSCs indicate the good repeatability of CXTS CEs (see Fig. S4 and Table S1 in the Supplementary Information). Therefore, the electrochemical data of dummy cells and photovoltaic performance of DSSCs confirm that substitution of Zn2+ by Co2+ and Ni2+ is effective for improving the electrocatalytic ability of kesterite CZTS CEs.

Density functional theory calculation

Considering that the catalytic activity of CEs strongly correlates with the adsorption and desorption processes of redox species, we perform density functional theory calculation to explore the origin of catalysis-activity enhancement caused by element substitution. First, we checked the change of adsorption energy toward I atom (EadI) during the substitution of Zn2+ by Co2+ and Ni2+. We found that the I atom was preferentially adsorbed on Zn2+ of CZTS, as the calculated EadI value of Sn4+ (0.295 eV) was significantly lower than that of Zn2+ (0.975 eV) (see Fig. S5 in the Supplementary Information). And the EadI value (Fig. 3 and Fig. S5 in the Supplementary Information) remarkably increased to 1.428 eV (CCTS) and 1.953 eV (CNTS) after the element substitution. This change indicated the stronger adsorption ability toward I atom of CCTS and CNTS CEs, resulted in their more efficient catalytic activity for reducing triiodides. Moreover, the calculated bond length between I atom and metal ions for the transition state (dI-MTS) decreased from 0.247 nm of CZTS to 0.245 nm of CCTS and 0.240 nm of CNTS, which could result in more difficult desorption of the adsorbed I atom (I*). These theoretical calculation data showed that the enhanced performance of CCTS and CNTS CEs compared CZTS was associated to the improved adsorption and desorption energy.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The schematic diagram of reducing triiodides on CXTS (112) surface: adsorption of I2, electron transfer, desorption of I*. The corresponding adsorption energy EadI, bond length dI-MTS are also shown.

Furthermore, we compared the amounts of I atom adsorbed on the CXTS surface by XPS5760 (see Fig. S6 in the Supplementary Information and Fig. 4). We immersed CXTS CEs in the iodide electrolyte for 30 minutes and rinsed them with ethanol. The peak area ratio of I 3d to Cu 2p spectra was marked as the normalized peak area of I 3d spectra. No signals of I 3d were found in XPS results before immersing. But, after immersing, the normalized peak area of I 3d spectra of CCTS (0.1894) and CNTS (0.1621) were significantly larger than that of CZTS (0.0443) (Fig. 4(b)), indicating more I atom adsorbed on CCTS and CNTS CEs surface. This change was consistent with the enhanced EadI values and decreased bond length. The electrochemical, photovoltaic and theoretical results all indicated that the substitution of Zn2+ by Co2+ and Ni2+ was effective to improve the catalytic activity of kesterite CZTS.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) I 3d, Zn 2p, Co 2p and Ni 2p XPS spectra of CXTS CEs before and after immersing in the iodide electrolyte for 30 minutes. (b) The normalized peak area of I 3d XPS spectra of CXTS CEs after immersing in the iodide electrolyte for 30 minutes and (c) the decrease of peak area of X 2p3/2 XPS spectra of CXTS CEs after immersing.

Durability test

The stability is one of the major factors to evaluate the property of CEs6163. Herein, we used Tafel, EIS and XPS tests to examine the stability of CXTS CEs. First, the current density in Tafel curves at −0.40 V (see Fig. S7 in the Supplementary Information) of the CZTS CEs decreased by 6% compared with the original ones after 1800 s test (Fig. 5). Whereas, the current density of Pt, CCTS and CNTS CEs only decreased by less than 3%, indicating the better stability of CCTS and CNTS CEs. The fitted Rs and Rct values obtained from EIS spectra of CXTS CEs before and after immersing in the iodide electrolyte for 30 minutes (see Fig. S8 and Table S2 in the Supplementary Information) also showed the good stability of CCTS and CNTS. In addition, after immersing, the peak area of Co and Ni XPS spectra decreased by 2.52% and 24.98% of the original ones, respectively (Fig. 4(c)). This result was significantly smaller than that of Zn spectra in CZTS (39.03%). Different stability measurements all suggested that the CCTS and CNTS CEs possessed better stability toward the iodide electrolyte compared with CZTS CE.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The change of the current density under −0.40 V for different cycles of Tafel polarization measurement of Pt and CXTS CEs. The current density of the first cycle and the last cycle are marked as J1 cycle and J30 cycle, respectively.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we proved that the substitution of Zn2+ by Co2+ and Ni2+ was a convenient but effective approach to enhance the electrocatalytic performance of kesterite CZTS CEs in DSSCs. After substitution, CCTS and CNTS CEs exhibited decreased charge transfer resistance (CCTS, 5.3 Ω; CNTS, 5.5 Ω; CZTS, 6.5 Ω) and improved electrocatalytic activity (PCE: CCTS, 8.3%; CNTS, 8.2%) compared with CZTS (7.9%) toward iodide electrolyte, which was comparable with the traditional Pt-based cells (8.3%). The enhanced activity was associated to the change of adsorption and desorption energy (the bond length between I atom and metal ions for the transition state (dI-MTS) of I atom by theoretical calculation. Furthermore, the stability of kesterite CXTS CEs was also significantly improved. The results indicated that this element substitution method without changing the materials structure was effective to improve potential catalysts performance, especially for the multicomponent compounds.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Materials (1,019.2KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 51372036, and 51602047) and the Key Project of China Ministry of Education (No. 113020 A). The authors sincerely acknowledge Dr. Hancheng Zhu for providing technology supporting characterization of the samples.

Author Contributions

S. Lu and H. Yang performed the experiments. F. Li and G. Yang performed the theoretical calculations. S. Chen helped to fabricate the samples. S. Lu, Y. Wang, X. Zhang and Y. Liu wrote the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-26770-1.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Yinglin Wang, Email: wangyl100@nenu.edu.cn.

Xintong Zhang, Email: xtzhang@nenu.edu.cn.

References

  • 1.Thomas S, et al. A review on counter electrode materials in dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2014;2:4474–4490. doi: 10.1039/C3TA13374E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kakiage K, et al. Fabrication of a high-performance dye-sensitized solar cell with 12.8% conversion efficiency using organic silyl-anchor dyes. Chem. Commun. 2015;51:6315–6317. doi: 10.1039/C5CC00464K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Huang S, et al. Improving the catalytic performance of Ni3S4-PtCo heteronanorods via Mott-Schottky effect toward the reduction of iodine couples in dye-sensitized solar cells. Electrochim. Acta. 2017;241:89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.04.116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bora A, Mohan K, Phukan P, Dolui S. A low cost carbon black/polyaniline nanotube composite as efficient electro-catalyst for triiodide reduction in dye sensitized solar cells. Electrochim. Acta. 2018;259:233–244. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.156. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pazoki M, Cappel U, Johansson E, Hagfeldt A, Boschloo G. Characterization techniques for dye-sensitized solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017;10:672–709. doi: 10.1039/C6EE02732F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang X, et al. Synthesis of Wurtzite Cu2ZnSnS4 Nanosheets with Exposed High-Energy (002) Facets for Fabrication of Efficient Pt-Free Solar Cell Counter Electrodes. Scientific Reports. 2018;8:248. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18631-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yun S, et al. Dye-sensitized solar cells employing polymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2016;59:1–40. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.10.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liu X, Gao L, Yue G, Zheng H, Zhang W. Efficient dye-sensitized solar cells incorporating hybrid counter electrode of CuMnSnS4 microsperes/carbon nanotubes. Sol. Energy. 2017;158:952–959. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2017.10.057. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang X, et al. Selenization of Cu2ZnSnS4 Enhanced the Performance of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: Improved Zinc-Site Catalytic Activity for I3−. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017;9:37662–37670. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b09642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhang X, et al. Significant Broadband Photocurrent Enhancement by Au-CZTS Core-Shell Nanostructured Photocathodes. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:23364. doi: 10.1038/srep23364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li L, et al. Preparation of carbon nanofibers supported MoO2 composites electrode materials for application in dye-sensitized solar cells. Electrochim. Acta. 2018;259:188–195. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.171. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yun S, Hagfeldt A, Ma T. Superior Catalytic Activity of Sub-5 mm-Thick Pt/SiC Films as Counter Electrodes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. ChemCatChem. 2014;6:1584–1588. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201402003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hao F, et al. Recent advances in alternative cathode materials for iodine-free dye-sensitized solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013;6:2003–2019. doi: 10.1039/c3ee40296g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hussain S, et al. Large area growth of MoTe2 films as high performance counter electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Scientific Reports. 2018;8:29. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18067-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Muralee Gopi C, Ravi S, Rao S, Reddy A, Kim H. Carbon nanotube/metal-sulfde composite flexible electrodes for high-performance quantum dot-sensitized solar cells and supercapacitor. Scientific Reports. 2017;9:46519. doi: 10.1038/srep46519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ye M, et al. Recent advances in dye-sensitized solar cells: from photoanodes, sensitizers and electrolytes to counter electrodes. Mater. Today. 2015;18:155–162. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2014.09.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liu F, et al. Low-temperature, solution-deposited metal chalcogenide films as highly efficient counter electrodes for sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2015;3:6315–6323. doi: 10.1039/C5TA00028A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Singh E, Kim K, Yeom G, Nalwa H. Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide based counter electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. RSC Adv. 2017;7:28234–28249. doi: 10.1039/C7RA03599C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wu J, et al. Counter electrodes in dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017;46:5975–6023. doi: 10.1039/C6CS00752J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Woo K, Kim Y, Moon J. A non-toxic, solution-processed, earth abundant absorbing layer for thin-film solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012;5:5340–5345. doi: 10.1039/C1EE02314D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chiu J, et al. Geogrid-Inspired Nanostructure to Reinforce a CuxZnySnzS Nanowall Electrode for High-Stability Electrochemical Energy Conversion Devices. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017;7:1602210. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201602210. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen H, Wang J, Jia C, Mou J, Zhu L. Highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cell with a novel nanohybrid film of Cu2ZnSnS4-MWCNTs as counter electrode. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017;422:591–596. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.04.212. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pang Z, et al. Direct growth of Cu2ZnSnS4 on three-dimensional porous reduced graphene oxide thin films as counter electrode with high conductivity and excellent catalytic activity for dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Sci. 2018;53:2748–2757. doi: 10.1007/s10853-017-1741-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Swami S, Chaturvedi N, Kumar A, Dutta V. Dye sensitized solar cells using the electric field assisted spray deposited kesterite (Cu2ZnSnS4) films as the counter electrodes for improved performance. Electrochim. Acta. 2018;263:26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.01.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Özel F, et al. Penternary chalcogenides nanocrystals as catalytic materials for efficient counter electrodes in dye-synthesized solar cells. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:29207. doi: 10.1038/srep29207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Xin X, He M, Han W, Jung J, Lin Z. Low-Cost Copper Zinc Tin Sulfide Counter Electrodes for High-Efficiency Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011;50:11739–11742. doi: 10.1002/anie.201104786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen S, et al. In situ synthesis of two-dimensional leaf-like Cu2ZnSnS4 plate arrays as a Pt-free counter electrode for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. Green Chem. 2016;18:2793–2801. doi: 10.1039/C5GC02814K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hou Z, et al. Magnetron sputtering route to efficiency enhanced Cu2ZnSnS4 thin films as the counter electrode of dye-sensitized solar cells. Sci. Adv. Mater. 2013;5:1764–1769. doi: 10.1166/sam.2013.1638. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fan M, Chen J, Li C, Cheng K, Ho K. Copper zinc tin sulfide as a catalytic material for counter electrodes in dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2015;3:562–569. doi: 10.1039/C4TA02319F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yu X, et al. Cu2ZnSnS4 Nanocrystals as Highly Active and Stable Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2016;120:24265–24270. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b08577. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sharma V, Singh I, Chandra A. Hollow nanostructures of metal oxides as next generation electrode materials for supercapacitors. Scientific Reports. 2018;8:1307. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19815-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wu Y, et al. The nanoscale effects on the morphology, microstructure and electrochemical performances of the cathodic deposited α-Ni(OH)2. Electrochim. Acta. 2018;261:58–65. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ao K, et al. Fe-doped Co9S8 nanosheets on carbon fiber cloth as pH-universal freestanding electrocatalysts for efficient hydrogen evolution. Electrochim. Acta. 2018;264:157–165. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.01.080. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ma Z, et al. Three-dimensional well-mixed/highly-densed NiS-CoS nanorod arrays: An efficient and stable bifunctional electrocatalyst for hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions. Electrochim. Acta. 2018;260:82–91. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kim D, et al. Chemical synthesis of hierarchical NiCo2S4 nanosheets like nanostructure on fexible foil for a high performance supercapacitor. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:9764. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10218-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jin Z, Zhang M, Wang M, Feng C, Wang Z. Metal Selenides as Efficient Counter Electrodes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017;50:895–904. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liu Y, et al. Coupling Sub-Nanometric Copper Clusters with Quasi-Amorphous Cobalt Sulfide Yields Efficient and Robust Electrocatalysts for Water Splitting Reaction. Adv. Mater. 2017;29:1606200. doi: 10.1002/adma.201606200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lu S, et al. Adsorption Energy Optimization of Co3O4 through Rapid Surface Sulfurization for Efficient Counter Electrode in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2017;121:12524–12530. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b01944. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yun S, et al. Metal Oxide/Carbide/Carbon Nanocomposites: In SituSynthesis, Characterization, Calculation, and their Application as an Efficient Counter Electrode Catalyst for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2013;3:1407. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201300242. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wu M, et al. Economical Pt-Free Catalysts for Counter Electrodes of Dye Sensitized Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:3419–3428. doi: 10.1021/ja209657v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sun H, Wang G, Wang Z. Co9Se8 Nanosheets Electrodes: Drop-Cast versus in situ Growth. Chinese J. Chem. 2017;35:645–650. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.201600411. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jia J, et al. Influence of deposition voltage of cobalt diselenide preparation on the film quality and the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Sol. Energy. 2017;151:61–67. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2017.05.036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yun S, Hagfeldt A, Ma T. Pt-Free Counter Electrode for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells with High Efficiency. Adv. Mater. 2014;26:6210–6237. doi: 10.1002/adma.201402056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hou Y, et al. Rational screening low-cost counter electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Nat. Commun. 2013;4:1583. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wang D, Jiang J, Wang H, Hu P. Revealing the Volcano-Shaped Activity Trend of Triiodide Reduction Reaction: A DFT Study Coupled with Microkinetic Analysis. ACS Catal. 2016;6:733–741. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b01714. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhang B, et al. Facet-dependent catalytic activity of platinum nanocrystals for triiodide reduction in dye-sensitized solar cells. Scientific Reports. 2013;3:1836. doi: 10.1038/srep01836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chen J, Mao Y, Wang H, Hu P. Theoretical study of heteroatom doping in tuning the catalytic activity of graphene for triiodide reduction. ACS Catal. 2016;6:6804–6813. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b01242. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Xiao Z, et al. Significantly enhancing the stability of a Cu2ZnSnS4 aqueous/ethanol-based precursor solution and its application in Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 solar cells. RSC Adv. 2015;5:103451–103457. doi: 10.1039/C5RA23015B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Liu F, et al. Kesterite Cu2ZnSnS4 thin film solar cells by a facile DMF-based solution coating process. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2015;3:10783–10792. doi: 10.1039/C5TC01750E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mali S, Patil P, Hong C. Low-Cost Electrospun Highly Crystalline Kesterite Cu2ZnSnS4 Nanofiber Counter Electrodes for Efficient Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2014;6:1688–1696. doi: 10.1021/am404586n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mokurala K, Mallick S, Bhargava P. Alternative quaternary chalcopyrite sulfides (Cu2FeSnS4 and Cu2CoSnS4) as electrocatalyst materials for counter electrodes in dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Power Sources. 2016;305:134–143. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.11.081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Benchikri M, et al. A high temperature route to the formation of highly pure quaternary chalcogenide particles. Mater. Lett. 2012;68:340–343. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.10.105. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chen H, Fu S, Tsai T, Shih C. Quaternary Cu2NiSnS4 thin films as a solar material prepared through electrodeposition. Mater. Lett. 2016;166:215–218. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.12.082. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Podsiadlo S, et al. Synthesis of magnetic doped kesterite single crystals. Cryst. Res. Technol. 2015;50:690–694. doi: 10.1002/crat.201400435. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Vanrenterghem B, et al. The reduction of benzylbromide at Ag-Ni deposits prepared by galvanic replacement. Electrochim. Acta. 2016;196:756–768. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.02.135. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Murakami T, Grätzel M. Counter electrodes for DSC: Application of functional materials as catalysts. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2008;361:572–580. doi: 10.1016/j.ica.2007.09.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Xie Y, et al. Highly crystalline stannite-phase Cu2XSnS4 (X = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Zn and Cd) nanoflower counter electrodes for ZnO-based dye-sensitised solar cells. J. Alloy. Compd. 2017;696:938–946. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ramasamy K, Zhang X, Bennett R, Gupta A. Synthesis, photoconductivity and self-assembly of wurtzite phase Cu2CdxZn1-2xSnS4 nanorods. RSC Adv. 2013;3:1186–1193. doi: 10.1039/C2RA22503D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Mao P, Liu Y, Jiao Y, Chen S, Yang Y. Enhanced uptake of iodide on Ag@Cu2O nanoparticles. Chemosphere. 2016;16:396–403. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.08.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Li K, et al. Combined DFT and XPS investigation of iodine anions adsorption on the sulfur terminated (001) chalcopyrite surface. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016;390:412–421. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.08.095. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Yun S, Lund P, Hinsch A. Stability assessment of alternative platinum free counter electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015;8:3495–3514. doi: 10.1039/C5EE02446C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Yun S, Pu H, Chen J, Hagfeldt A, Ma T. Enhanced Performance of Supported HfO2 Counter Electrodes for Redox Couples Used in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. ChemSusChem. 2014;7:442–450. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201301140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zhang C, et al. Electrospun FeS nanorods with enhanced stability as counter electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Electrochim. Acta. 2017;229:229–238. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.01.148. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials (1,019.2KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES