Abstract
The present data in brief article provides additional data and information to our research article “Micro- and nanostructures reflect the degree of diagenetic alteration in modern and fossil brachiopod shell calcite: a multi-analytical screening approach (CL, FE-SEM, AFM, EBSD)” [1] (Casella et al.). We present fibre morphology, nano- and microstructure, as well as calcite crystal orientations and textures found in pristine, experimentally altered (hydrothermal and thermal), and diagenetically overprinted brachiopod shells. Combination of the screening tools AFM, FE-SEM, and EBSD allows to observe a significant change in microstructural and textural features with an increasing degree of laboratory-based and naturally occurring diagenetic alteration. Amalgamation of neighbouring fibres was observed on the micrometre scale level, whereas progressive decomposition of biopolymers in the shells and fusion of nanoparticulate calcite crystals was detected on the nanometre scale. The presented data in this article and the study described in [1] allows for qualitative information on the degree of diagenetic alteration of fossil archives used for palaeoclimate reconstruction.
Keywords: Nanocomposite mesocrystal biocarbonate [NMB]; Inorganic rhombohedral calcite [IRC]; Diagenetic tracers: FE-SEM, AFM, EBSD; Brachiopods; Diagenetic alteration; Low-Mg calcite
Specifications Table
Subject area | Crystallography |
---|---|
More specific subject area | Micro- and nanostructure of modern and fossil biogenic carbonate archives |
Type of data | Figures, text file |
How data was acquired | Microtome: Leica Ultracut equipped with glass knives and DiATOME diamond knife |
Critical Point Drying: BAL-TEC CPD 030 | |
FE-SEM: Hitachi S5200 field emission SEM | |
EBSD: Hitachi SU5000 field emission SEM equipped with a Nordlys II EBSD detector and AZTec acquisition software | |
AFM: JPK Instruments NanoWizard II equipped with a n+-silicon cantilever, measurements were conducted in contact mode | |
Data format | Analysed |
Experimental factors | Thermal and hydrothermal alteration experiments |
Experimental features | Thermal alteration experiments on modern brachiopod specimens were performed under dry conditions at 100 °C (for 72 hours, and three months), and at 400 °C (for 48 hours). |
Hydrothermal alteration experiments on modern brachiopod specimens were conducted in either simulated meteoric or burial fluids at 175 °C for 28 days. | |
Pristine, thermally and hydrothermally altered, and fossil brachiopod shell fragments were embedded in epoxy resin and successively ground and polished for further investigations [see 1, 2]. | |
Data source location | Friday Harbor Laboratories, University of Washington, U.S.A. (Terebratalia transversa), |
Signy and Rothera Islands, Antarctica (Liothyrella uva), | |
Upper Ordovician Dillsboro Formation, Indiana, U.S.A (Platystrophia laticostata), Lower Jurassic Ait Athmane Formation of the Central High Atlas Basin, Morocco (Quadratirhynchia attenuata) , | |
Luc-Sur-Mer, Normandy, France (Digonella digona) and, Bakony Mountains, Hungary (Lobothyris punctata). | |
Data accessibility | Data is with this article |
Value of the data
-
•
The data provides fundamental, quantitative and qualitative information on the assessment of the degree of (diagenetic) alteration of brachiopod shells.
-
•
Hydrothermal alteration experiments mimicking diagenetic alteration may be applied to other biogenic hard tissues and inorganic mineral assemblages (e.g., rocks) in order to objectively compare the degree of diagenetic overprint.
-
•
Data analysed by multi-analytical screening methods (FE-SEM, EBSD, AFM) may provide crucial information on the history of fossils used in research fields such as reconstruction of the palaeoclimates and palaeoenvironments.
-
•
A comparison between microstructure and texture analyses of our data with isotope analysis may provide more detailed understanding of diagenetic overprint of fossil samples.
1. Data
Among marine biocarbonates, calcitic brachiopod shells are one of the most used archives in palaeoclimate and palaeoecological research [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. In the past few decades, basic knowledge on microstructural and textural patterns of pristine brachiopod shells was established [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. Here, we focus on additional insights on microstructural and nanostructural characteristics caused by (mimicked) diagenetic alteration by using biochemical etching (Fig. 1, Fig. 2), FE-SEM (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5), EBSD orientation and texture data evaluation (Fig. 6, Fig. 7, Fig. 8, Fig. 9, Fig. 10), and AFM imaging (Fig. 11, Fig. 12, Fig. 13) of pristine, thermally, hydrothermally, and diagenetically altered brachiopod shells. Based on FE-SEM imaging and EBSD measurements, high-resolution data on pristine, (hydro-) thermally altered, and fossil brachiopod specimens was obtained and subsequently analysed. We compare micro- and nanostructural data of pristine and (hydro-) thermally or diagenetically altered brachiopod shells, i.e., the presence of organic matrices, and the shape of calcite fibres of the fibrous secondary shell layer. Texture analysis deduced from EBSD measurements on fossil brachiopods with varying degrees of diagenetic overprint shows the relation between the degree of crystallographic co-orientation and diagenetic history experienced by biogenic minerals. AFM imaging of hydrothermally and fossil brachiopod shells provides supporting and more detailed data on fibre morphologies and their internal structure.
2. Experimental design, materials and methods
2.1. Experimental designs of simulated diagenetic alteration
2.1.1. Thermal alteration
Thermal alteration was carried out in order to observe the decomposition of the enclosing organic membranes. Sample material used in thermal alteration experiments was heated in an oven at 100 °C for 72 h and for three months, as well as at 400 °C for 48 h.
2.1.2. Hydrothermal alteration
Hydrothermal alteration experiments were performed in the presence of either simulated meteoric (10 mM NaCl aqueous solution) or simulated burial (100 mM NaCl + 10 mM MgCl2 aqueous solution) fluid. Both solutions were prepared using high-purity deionised water [1], [2], [21]. Sample material and 10 ml of fluid were inserted into a polytetrafluoroethylene crucible which was placed inside a metal autoclave. Experiments were conducted at 100 °C for 28 days using either simulated meteoric or burial fluid. Pressure conditions during the hydrothermal alteration experiments corresponded to the vapour pressure of water at the given temperature.
2.2. Pristine and fossil brachiopod materials
2.2.1. Investigated pristine brachiopods
Modern brachiopod specimens of Terebratalia transversa (Sowerby, 1846) and Liothyrella uva (Broderip, 1833) were utilised in biochemical studies for establishing baselines of pristine brachiopod shell micro- and nanostructures, as well as in thermal and hydrothermal alteration experiments mimicking diagenetic alteration of biogenic carbonates. Sampling sites of both live collected brachiopods were Friday Harbor Laboratories, University of Washington, U.S.A., and Signy and Rothera Islands, Antarctica, for T. transversa and L. uva, respectively.
2.2.2. Investigated fossil brachiopods
Four fossil equivalents were chosen from basins which experienced different burial depths and diagenetic temperatures. Platystrophia laticostata (James, 1871) was collected from the Upper Ordovician Dillsboro Formation, Indiana, U.S.A. The Jurassic brachiopods Lobothyris punctata (Sowerby, 1812) and Quadratirhynchia attenuata (Dubar, 1931) were collected at the Bakony Mountains, Hungary, and Ait Athmane Formation of the Central Atlas Basin, Morocco, respectively. Digonella digona (Sowerby, 1815) is the youngest of all Jurassic brachiopod samples and its sampling site was located at Luc-Sur-Mer, Normandy, France. Further information on all utilised brachiopod specimens is given in [1].
2.3. Microtome cutting and polishing
Brachiopod shell fragments of pristine and fossil brachiopod species were mounted on 3 mm thick cylindrical aluminium rods using super glue. In order to obtain plane surfaces, the samples were microtome cut using a Leica Ultracut ultramicrotome equipped with glass knives. Subsequently, the cut specimens were polished by stepwise removal of material in a series of slices with successively decreasing thicknesses (90 nm, 70 nm, 40 nm, 20 nm, 10 nm, and 5 nm) using a DiATOME diamond knife. Each step was repeated 15 times [22].
2.4. Selective biochemical etching
Microtome-polished shell surfaces were etched and the organic matter fixed, simultaneously, while immersed in a solution of 0.1 M HEPES (pH= 6.5) and 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 180 seconds. The etching procedure was stopped by a dehydration step in 100% isopropyl 3 times for 10 minutes each. Subsequently, specimens were critical point dried using a BAL-TEC CPD 030 (Liechtenstein) device and rotary coated with 3 nm of platinum.
2.5. FE-SEM imaging
For FE-SEM imaging, selected sample material was prepared by microtome cutting and polishing following a selective biochemical etching treatment. However, the major preparation technique for SEM imaging and EBSD measurements of brachiopod samples was carried out as follows. Brachiopod shells were longitudinally cut from the umbo to the commissure and, subsequently, embedded in epoxy resin. Shell surfaces were conventionally ground and polished in sequential steps down to a grain size of 1 µm (particle size of polishing agent). The preparation was finalised by an etch-polishing step utilising colloidal alumina with particle sizes of approx. 0.05 µm in a vibratory polisher. Subsequently, sample surfaces were rotary coated with 4–6 nm of carbon.
FE-SEM imaging was carried out at 4, 5, or 10 kV using a Hitachi S5200 electron microscope.
2.6. EBSD measurements, band contrast and analysis of calcite orientation data
For EBSD measurements, brachiopod shells were conventionally ground and polished as described above. Sample surfaces were rotary coated with 4–6 nm of carbon.
EBSD measurements were conducted at 20 kV using a Hitachi SU5000 FE-SEM equipped with a Nordlys II EBSD detector and AZTec acquisition. Obtained EBSD data was evaluated using CHANNEL 5 HKL evaluation software [23], [24].
Data on crystal orientation is shown as band contrast images and colour-coded crystal orientation maps with corresponding pole figures. EBSD band contrast represents the quality of the Kikuchi diffraction pattern in each measured point, thus, strong EBSD signals result in a bright image point and weak or absent signals (e.g., due to pores, organic matter, amorphous phases) result in dark image points. Crystallographic orientation maps were derived from EBSD scans. A measure of co-orientation within single crystals or ensembles of crystals are given by the multiple of uniform distribution (MUD). High MUD values indicate highly co-oriented crystallographic axes (e.g., MUD of > 700 in inorganic single crystals [25]) and, thus, a strong texture. Low MUD values down to 1.0 reflect randomly oriented crystallographic axes, thus, a weak or no texture.
2.7. AFM imaging
For AFM imaging, brachiopod specimens were prepared by two different preparation techniques, i.e., microtome cutting using glass knives and polishing using a diamond knife, as well as by conventional grinding and polishing as is described above (see subchapters 2.3 and 2.5). The latter includes an additional step, i.e., cleaning of the highly polished sample surface for 10 min. using high-purity deionised water in an ultrasonic bath, rinsing with ethanol and subsequent air drying. Rotary coating was not applied prior to AFM imaging.
Atomic force microscopy was conducted on hydrothermally altered and fossil brachiopod shells. Images were taken in contact mode.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the German Research Council (DFG) for financial support in the collaborative research initiative CHARON (DFG Forschergruppe 1644, grant agreement number SCHM 930/11-1). Furthermore, the project has received funding from the European Union´s Horizon 2020 Research And Innovation Programme under grant agreement number 643084. We acknowledge helpful reviews by two anonymous reviewers, E. Harper, C. Garbelli, A. Pérez-Huerta, I. Montanez (editor), and the managing editor for data in brief articles.
Footnotes
Transparency data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2018.05.041.
Transparency document. Supplementary material
.
References
- 1.Casella L.A., Griesshaber E., Simonet Roda M., Ziegler A., Mavromatis V., Henkel D., Laudien J., Häusserman V., Neuser R.D., Angiolini L., Dietzel M., Eisenhauer M., Immenhauser A., Brand U., Schmahl W.W. Micro- and nanostructures reflect the degree of diagentic alteration in modern and fossil brachiopod shell calcite: a multi-analytical screening approach (CL, FE-SEM, AFM, EBSD) Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2018;502:13–30. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Casella L.A., Griesshaber E., Yin X., Ziegler A., Mavromatis V., Müller D., Ritter A.-C., Hippler D., Harper E.M., Dietzel M., Immenhauser A., Schöne B.R., Angiolini L., Schmahl W.W. Experimental diagenesis: insights into aragonite to calcite transformation of Arctica islandica shells. Biogeosciences. 2017;14:1461–1492. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lowenstam H.A. Mineralogy, O18/O16 ratios, and strontium and magnesium contents of recent and fossil brachiopods and their bearing on the history of the oceans. J. Geol. 1961;69:241–260. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Veizer J., Fritz P., Jones B. Geochemistry of brachiopods: oxygen and carbon isotopic records of Paleozoic oceans. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 1986;50:1679–1696. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brand U. Biogeochemistry of late Paleozoic American brachiopods and secular variation of seawater composition. Biogeochemistry. 1989;7:159–193. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bates N.R., Brand U. Environmental and physiological influences on isotopic and elemental compositions of brachiopod shell calcite: implications for the isotopic evolution of Paleozoic oceans. Chem. Geol. Isot. Geosci. Sect. 1991;94:67–78. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Angiolini L., Jadoul F., Leng M.J., Stephenson M.H., Rushton J., Chenery S., Crippa G. How cold were the Early Permian glacial tropics? Testing sea-surface temperature using the oxygen isotope composition of rigorously screened brachiopod shells. J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 2009;166:933–945. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Garbelli C., Angiolini L., Jadoul F., Brand U. Micromorphology and differential preservation of Upper Permian brachiopod low-Mg calcite. Chem. Geol. 2012;298-299:1–10. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Barbin V., Ramseyer K., Debenay J.P., Schein E., Roux M., Decrouez D. Cathodoluminescence of recent biogenic carbonates - an environmental and ontogenetic fingerprint. Geol. Mag. 1991;128:19–26. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schmahl W.W., Griesshaber E., Neuser R.D., Lenze A., Job R., Brand U. The microstructure of the fibrous layer of terebratulide brachiopod shell calcite. Eur. J. Miner. 2004;16:693–697. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schmahl W.W., Griesshaber E., Kelm K., Goetz A., Jordan G., Ball A., Xu D., Merkel C., Brand U. Hierarchical structure of marine shell biomaterials: biomechanical functionalization of calcite by brachiopods. Z. Kristallogr. 2012;227:793–804. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Griesshaber E., Kelm K., Sehrbrock A., Schmahl W.W., Mader W., Mutterlose J., Brand U. Amorphous components in the shell material of the brachiopod Megerlia truncata. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2007;71(Supplement S) (A354-A354) [Google Scholar]
- 13.Griesshaber E., Schmahl W.W., Neuser R., Pettke T., Blüm M., Mutterlose J., Brand U. Crystallographic texture and microstructure of terebratulide brachiopod shell calcite: an optimized materials design with hierarchical architecture. Am. Mineralo. 2007;92:722–734. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Griesshaber E., Neuser R.D., Brand U., Schmahl W.W. Texture and microstructure of modern rhynchonellide brachiopod shells - an ontogenetic study. In: Rollett A.D., editor. Applications of Texture Analysis. John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Griesshaber E., Neuser R.D., Schmahl W.W. The application of EBSD analysis to biomaterials: microstructural and crystallographic texture variations in marine carbonate shells. Semin. Soc. Esp. Mineral. 2010;7:22–34. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cusack M., Dauphin Y., Chung P., Pérez-Huerta A., Cuif J.-P. Multiscale structure of calcite fibres of the shell of the brachiopod Terebratulina retusa. J. Struct. Biol. 2008;164:96–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2008.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cusack M., Pérez-Huerta A., Janousch M., Finch A.A. Magnesium in the lattice of calcite-shelled brachiopods. Chem. Geol. 2008;257:59–64. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cusack M. Biomineral electron backscatter diffraction for palaeontology. Palaeontology. 2015;59:171–179. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Goetz A.J., Griesshaber E., Neuser R.D., Lüter C., Hühner M., Harper E., Schmahl W.W. Calcite morphology, texture and hardness in the distinct layers of rhynchonelliform brachiopod shells. Eur. J. Mineral. 2009;21:303–315. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Goetz A.J., Steinmetz D.R., Griesshaber E., Zaefferer S., Raabe D., Kelm K., Irsen S., Sehrbrock A., Schmahl W.W. Interdigitating biocalcite dendrites form a 3-D jigsaw structure in brachiopod shells. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:2237–2243. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.01.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ritter A.-C., Mavromatis V., Dietzel M., Wiethoff F., Griesshaber E., Casella L.A., Schmahl W.W., Koelen J., Neuser R.D., Leis A., Buhl D., Niedermayr A., Bernasconi S.M., Immenhauser A. Exploring the impact of diagenesis on (isotope)geochemical and microstructural alteration features in biogenic aragonite. Sedimentology. 2017;64:1354–1380. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fabritius H., Walther P., Ziegler A. Architecture of the organic matrix in the sternal CaCO3 deposits of Porcellio scaber (Crustacea, Isopoda) J. Struct. Biol. 2005;150:190–199. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Schmidt N.H., Olesen N.O. Computer-aided determination of crystal-lattice orientation from electron channeling patterns in the SEM. Can. Mineral. 1989;27:15–22. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Randle V., Engler O. CRC Press; Amsterdam: 2000. Introduction to Texture Analysis. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nindiyasari F., Ziegler A., Griesshaber E., Fernández-Díaz L., Huber J., Walther P., Schmahl W.W. Effect of hydrogel matrices on calcite crystal growth morphology, aggregate formation, and co-orientation in biomimetic experiments and biomineralization environments. Cryst. Growth Des. 2015;15:2667–2685. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.