Skip to main content
Biotechnology Reports logoLink to Biotechnology Reports
. 2018 Apr 30;18:e00254. doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2018.e00254

Proteiniphilum saccharofermentans str. M3/6T isolated from a laboratory biogas reactor is versatile in polysaccharide and oligopeptide utilization as deduced from genome-based metabolic reconstructions

Geizecler Tomazetto a,, Sarah Hahnke c, Daniel Wibberg b,, Alfred Pühler b, Michael Klocke c, Andreas Schlüter b
PMCID: PMC5993710  PMID: 29892569

Highlights

  • P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T harbors several carbohydrate active enzymes.

  • The strain encodes 64 polysaccharide utilization loci (PULs).

  • Several PULs are associated with genes encoding carbohydrate active enzymes.

  • P. saccharofermentans M3/6T harbors two CRISPR-cas systems.

Keywords: Carbohydrate-active enzymes, Polysaccharide utilization loci, Anaerobic digestion, Biomethanation, Metabolic pathway reconstruction, Bioconversion

Abstract

Proteiniphilum saccharofermentans str. M3/6T is a recently described species within the family Porphyromonadaceae (phylum Bacteroidetes), which was isolated from a mesophilic laboratory-scale biogas reactor. The genome of the strain was completely sequenced and manually annotated to reconstruct its metabolic potential regarding biomass degradation and fermentation pathways. The P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T genome consists of a 4,414,963 bp chromosome featuring an average GC-content of 43.63%. Genome analyses revealed that the strain possesses 3396 protein-coding sequences. Among them are 158 genes assigned to the carbohydrate-active-enzyme families as defined by the CAZy database, including 116 genes encoding glycosyl hydrolases (GHs) involved in pectin, arabinogalactan, hemicellulose (arabinan, xylan, mannan, β-glucans), starch, fructan and chitin degradation. The strain also features several transporter genes, some of which are located in polysaccharide utilization loci (PUL). PUL gene products are involved in glycan binding, transport and utilization at the cell surface. In the genome of strain M3/6T, 64 PUL are present and most of them in association with genes encoding carbohydrate-active enzymes. Accordingly, the strain was predicted to metabolize several sugars yielding carbon dioxide, hydrogen, acetate, formate, propionate and isovalerate as end-products of the fermentation process. Moreover, P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T encodes extracellular and intracellular proteases and transporters predicted to be involved in protein and oligopeptide degradation. Comparative analyses between P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T and its closest described relative P. acetatigenes str. DSM 18083T indicate that both strains share a similar metabolism regarding decomposition of complex carbohydrates and fermentation of sugars.

1. Introduction

Biogas can be produced by anaerobic digestion (AD) of a wide range of plant materials, organic wastes, and residual organic materials. The biogas-production process is regarded as eco-friendly technology to generate energy from biomass [1,2]. AD is commonly divided into four phases, i.e. hydrolysis, acidogenesis, acetogenesis and methanogenesis, which are conducted by complex consortia consisting of several hundreds of microbial species. Despite the fact that the overall biological process, which finally leads to the production of biogas, is well known, the majority of microbial biogas community members and their metabolic activities in particular are largely unknown [[3], [4], [5], [6], [7]].

In recent years, several bioreactors were taxonomically profiled by high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA marker gene [5,[8], [9], [10]]. These studies reported that members of the classes Clostridia and Bacteroidia frequently dominate biogas communities. Members of both classes are responsible for degradation of complex carbohydrates and proteins to monomers and are able to ferment sugar molecules yielding volatile organic acids [11,12]. To deduce functional profiles of biogas communities, shotgun metagenome sequencing has been done [6,[13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]].

The first metagenomic studies were based on non-assembled short reads and on small numbers of short contigs [4,[14], [15], [16],19], providing a gene content overview of microbial communities involved in anaerobic digestion. Recently, deep metagenome sequencing of DNA from biogas communities enabled assembly of sequence reads and binning of contigs to bin-genomes improving gene prediction and functional interpretation of metagenome sequence data [6,10,20]. However, the reconstruction of complete genome sequences from metagenome sequence data is demanding which is due to highly related sequences originating from different organisms [21,22]. Culture-independent approaches helped to elucidate taxonomic structures and gene contents of many microbiomes [[23], [24], [25], [26]]. Complementary, traditional cultivation-based microbiological analyses including genome sequencing still yield reliable genome sequence information of individual microorganisms and corresponding phenotypic features, which are also useful for interpretation of bin-genomes. Recently, a number of new bacterial species were isolated from biogas reactors [80]. Subsequent genome sequencing and metabolic reconstructions based on genome sequence information led to the prediction of the role of these microorganisms within the biogas process [[27], [28], [29], [30], [31]]. Among these newly characterized strains, Proteiniphilum saccharofermentans str. M3/6T was isolated from a mesophilic laboratory-scale biogas reactor [31]. Microbiological characterization revealed that, besides utilization of complex proteinaceous substrates such as yeast extract and peptone, the isolate was able to ferment mono- and disaccharides. Moreover, it produced extracellular enzymes involved in degradation of complex carbohydrates, namely β-glucan, xylan, arabinoxylan, starch, arabinogalactan, phosphoric acid-swollen cellulose and carboxymethyl cellulose (CM-cellulose). Considering these phenotypic features indispensable for effective biomass conversion, it was worthwhile to establish and analyze the complete genome sequence of P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T to uncover its genetic potential regarding carbohydrate-active enzymes involved in AD of biomass. The genome was manually annotated and interpreted to reconstruct metabolic pathways dedicated to biomass degradation and fermentation processes. Gene clusters encoding polysaccharide utilization loci (PUL) were analyzed in detail. Obtained findings are of importance regarding the biotechnological process of biomass conversion to biofuels.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Strain cultivation and DNA isolation

P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T was cultivated at 37 °C in anoxic basal medium with yeast extract and proteose peptone (5 g l−1 each) as described by Hahnke et al. [31]. The extraction of genomic DNA was performed using the Gentra Puregene Yeast/Bact. Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The obtained DNA was purified using the NucleoSpin® gDNA Clean-up kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany).

2.2. Sequencing, assembly and annotation

The total genomic DNA was used for the construction of a standard shotgun library applying the Nextera® Mate-Pair Library Preparation Kit (Illumina), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The genomic library was sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq system. After processing of the raw data, the reads were assembled into contigs using the Newbler De Novo Assembler (version 2.8). Genome finishing was performed using the CONSED software package [32] for ordering and joining the contigs. Genome analyses, interpretation and reconstruction of metabolic pathways were performed as recently described [33]. Briefly, the assembled genome sequence was imported into the annotation platform GenDB [34] for automatic prediction of genes. All predicted genes were analyzed and validated manually by means of BLAST against different databases including Pfam, TIGRFAM, InterPro, SwissProt, and the non-redundant NCBI protein sequence database (NR). Putative tRNA and rRNA genes were identified with RNAmmer [35], RBSfinder [36] and tRNAscan-SE [37] and SignalP [38] and TMHMM [39] were used to predict signal peptides and transmembrane proteins. To identify phage-related genes and genomic islands (GI), the P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T genome was uploaded in PHAST [40] and IslandViewer [41], respectively. The CRISPRfinder [42] in combinantion with the CRISPRdb database [43] was applied to identified CRISPR arrays (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) in the strain M3/6T genome. The cas gene predicted by GenDB was manually verified by means of BLAST against the database cited above. Finally, comparisons between the genome of strain M3/6T and that of the type strain of its most closely related species, Proteiniphilum acetatigenes DSM 18083T, were carried out using the EDGAR tool [44]. Synteny analyses, identification of orthologous genes and classification of genes as core genes or singletons were done within EDGAR.

2.3. Reconstruction of metabolic pathways

To determine the diversity of carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZyme) families present in the P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T genome, all predicted gene products were compared against the HMM profile-based database dbCAN [45] using hmmsearch in the HMMER software package [46]. Predicted CAZymes were also analyzed using Priam profiles [47]. The metabolic pathways of biomass degradation represented in the genome of strain M3/6T were reconstructed based on EC numbers of predicted enzymes in combination with Pathway tools [48]. Finally, ABC transporters were predicted and classified comparing the predicted proteins to the TCDB database [49].

2.4. Nucleotide sequence accession number

The genome of P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T was deposited in the EMBL-EBI database (European Bioinformatics Institute database) under the accession number LT605205.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. General features of the Proteiniphilum saccharofermentans str. M3/6T genome

The strain M3/6T was isolated from a two-phase Upflow Anaerobic Solid-State (UASS) reactor fed with 95% maize silage and 5% wheat straw as substrates [31]. The bacterium belongs to the family Porphyromonadaceae within the phylum Bacteroidetes and it was characterized as an acidogenic microorganism producing acetate, propionate and isovalerate [31]. To uncover the genetic potential of the strain in the context of the biogas production process, its genome sequence was established, manually annotated and analyzed including reconstruction of metabolic pathways and comparative examination.

Sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq system resulted in 3,174,424 sequence reads corresponding to a 165-fold coverage of the 4.4 Mb genome. The Newbler assembler (version 2.8) was used to assemble obtained reads into 60 (>100 bp) contigs. In silico finishing applying the platform CONSED led to closure of all gaps between contigs and circularization of the genome. The finished chromosomal sequence consists of 4,414,963 bp and has a GC content of 43.63% (Table 1, Fig. 1). Gene prediction resulted in identification of 3396 protein coding sequences (CDS), 48 tRNA genes, and six ribosomal RNA (rrn) operons. Among the CDSs, 58.5% could be classified according to COG categories comprising 20 higher-ranking functional groups (Table 1, Supplementary file 1: Table S1).

Table 1.

General features of the P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T genome.

Feature Chromosome
Genome size (bp) 4,414,963
GC content (%) 43.63
Total genes 3450
Protein coding genes 3396
Genes with functional prediction 2385
Genes assigned to COGs (%) 58.5
Genes encoding proteins with signal peptides 472
Genes encoding proteins with transmembrane helices 847
rRNA operons 6
tRNA genes 48

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Genome plot of P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T. The first outer circle represents the genome scale in kb. The origin of replication was determined based on GC skew analyses. Second and third circle: predicted protein-coding sequences (CDS) on the forward and the reverse strands colored according to the assigned COG categories. Fourth and fifth inner circles represent the GC-content and GC-skew, respectively. Red squares on the outer circle indicate CRISPR-cas systems.

The strain M3/6T genome contains some putative phage genes, but no complete prophage cluster could be identified. Regarding mobile genetic elements (MGE), 89 transposase genes were identified. Moreover, the strain possesses two CRISPR-cas systems which commonly play a role in preventing invasion of phages and mobile genetic elements [50].

No virulence, antibiotic resistance or pathogenicity-related genes were identified in the strain M3/6T genome by IslandViewer [41].

3.2. Genes involved in complex carbohydrate or protein degradation

A number of species of the phylum Firmicutes, namely of the families Clostridiaceae and Ruminococcaceae are able to hydrolyze long-chained carbohydrates such as cellulose [51,52]. Most prominent and well-studied is the thermophilic species Clostridium thermocellum, but also other members of the genera Clostridium, Acetivibrio, and Ruminococcus adapted to mesophilic or thermophilic process regimes are involved in cellulose degradation [53]. In some biogas reactors operated at mesophilic temperatures, also a higher abundance of members of the phylum Bacteroidetes was observed indicating their participation in hydrolysis of organic compounds [54,55]. In contrast, in thermophilic biogas reactors operated at 50–60 °C, Bacteroidetes were not or only detectable in minor amounts [7]. Interestingly, upon further increase of the process temperature to 65 °C and above, Bacteroidetes members proliferate again leading to a reduced abundance of Firmicutes [56]. However, most of the Bacteroidetes species detected in biogas reactors are not sufficiently characterized yet to interpret their role in AD.

To overcome these limitations, the genome of the newly isolated P. sacchorofermentans str. M3/6T was screened for the presence of carbohydrate-active enzymes listed in the CAZy database (www.cazy.org) [57].

According to the CAZy classification scheme, the genome of the strain M3/6T encodes 116 glycoside hydrolyses (GH), 25 glycosyl-transferases (GT), seven carbohydrate esterases (CE), two polysaccharide lyases (PL), and seven gene products featuring carbohydrate binding motifs (CBM). A summarizing overview is given in Fig. 2 and Table 2 and in Supplementary file 1 (Tables S2 and S3). Among them, the strain M3/6T encodes a variety of carbohydrate-active enzymes required for degradation of different complex carbohydrates, including pectin, arabinogalactan, hemicellulose (arabinan, xylan, mannan, β-glucans), starch, fructan, and chitin. A recent study reported that the microorganism showed only weak extracellular enzyme activities against β-glucan, starch, arabinogalactan, xylan, arabinoxylan, CM-cellulose, and phosphoric acid-swollen cellulose [31]. However, it is important to note that different environmental conditions may cause different physiological responses and that the pure-culture conditions applied to determine extracellular enzyme activities did not correspond to the environmental conditions in the biogas reactor from which the strain M3/6T was isolated. Thus, regarding its repertoire of carbohydrate-active enzymes, the potential of the strain to degrade carbohydrates might be more versatile as previously reported. The repertoire of carbohydrate active enzymes encoded in the genome of strain M3/6T is described below.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Schematic overview of PUL (Polysaccharide Utilization Loci) predicted in the P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T genome. To facilitate visualization of gene arrangements, these are colored according to the function of the encoded proteins SusC (blue), SusD (purple), SusE (light blue), HP (hypothetical protein, gray), GHs (Glycoside Hydrolase, pink), CBM (Carbohydrate-Binding Module, green), PL (Polysaccharide Lyases, light orange), CE (Carbohydrate Esterase, dark orange), TonB (TonB-linked outer membrane protein, light pink), Pept (Peptidase, light green), MFS (Major Facilitator Superfamily, light pink), regulators (AraC, LacI, HTCS, ECF, Gntr, Anti-sigma, yellow). Genes that do not encode PUL components were marked with’ non-PUL genes’ (nPULg, dark brown).

Table 2.

Carbohydrate active enzymes (CAZy) encoded in the P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T genome.

Substrate target Enzyme name ECa number Familyb
Pectin Pectinesterase 3.1.1.11 CE8
Exo-poly-α-d-galacturonosidase 3.2.1.82 GH28
α-l-rhamnosidase 3.2.1.40 GH33
α-l-rhamnosidase 3.2.1.40 GH78
Rhamnogalacturonyl hydrolase 3.2.1.172 GH105
Pectate lyase superfamily protein GH28



Arabinogalactan Arabinogalactan endo-β-1,4-galactanase 3.2.1.89 GH53
Putative Galactan endo-1,6-β-galactosidase 3.2.1.164 GH30



Arabinan (Hemicellulose) Putative α-l-arabinofuranosidase 3.2.1.55 GH43
α-l-arabinofuranosidase 3.2.1.55 GH51
β-l-arabinofuranosidase 3.2.1.185 GH127
Arabinan endo-1,5-α-l-arabinosidase 3.2.1.99 GH43



Xylan (Hemicellulose) Xylan 1,4-β-xylosidase 3.2.1.37 GH43
Xylan 1,3-β-xylosidase 3.2.1.72
Acetyl xylan esterase 3.1.1.72



Mannan (Hemicellulose) β-mannanase 3.2.1.78 GH26
Putative mannan endo-1,6-α-mannosidase. 3.2.1.101 GH76



Lichenan Licheninase 3.2.1.73 GH16



Cellulose Cellulase 3.2.1.4 GH5
Cellulose 1,4-β-cellobiosidase 3.2.1.91 GH9
β-glucosidase 3.2.1.21 GH3



Chitin Chitinase 3.2.1.14 GH18
β-N-acetylhexosaminidase 3.2.1.52 GH20
N-acetylglucosamine kinase 2.7.1.59
Putative β-hexosaminidase 3.2.1.52 GH3



Starch α-amylase 3.2.1.1 GH13
Putative glucan 1,4-α-glucosidase 3.2.1.3 GH15
Putative α-amylase 3.2.1.1 GH57
4-α-glucanotransferase 2.4.1.25
Glycogen Phosphorylase 2.4.1.1 GT35



Pullulan Neopullulanase 3.2.1.135 GH13



Fructan Fructan β-fructosidase 3.2.1.80 GH32
β-fructofuranosidase 3.2.1.26 GH32

Enzymes encoded in the P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T genome were compared against the HMM profile-based database dbCAN using hmmsearch in the HMMER software package. Results were manually curated considering best BLAST hits, alignments, and e-values. In addition, PRIAM profiles were used for classifications.

a

Enzyme Commission number.

b

CAZy families.

3.2.1. Pectin

Pectin is present in the primary cell wall of higher plants and responsible for its structural integrity. It is composed of homogalacturonan (HG), rhamnogalacturonan I (RGI) and rhamnogalacturonan II (RGII), all containing d-galacturonic acid in their side chains. The P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T genome encodes the enzymes pectinesterase (EC 3.1.1.11), polygalacturonase (EC 3.2.1.15), exo-poly-α-d-galacturonosidase (EC 3.2.1.82) and pectate lyases. Pectin degradation starts with the action of pectinesterases, followed by polygalacturonases and pectate lyases catalyzing deesterification of pectin. Pectic acid is released which than is broken down by endo- or exo-polygalacturonases producing mono- or di-galacturonate. Genes involved in degradation of RGI, encoding rhamnogalacturan acetylesterase (EC 3.1.1.86), rhamnogalacturonyl hydrolase (EC 3.2.1.172) and α-l-rhamnosidase (EC 3.2.1.40) were also identified in the genome of strain M3/6T. These enzymes act on RGI and produce rhamnose residues. Furthermore, two genes for polysaccharide lyases (PL), which catalyze random cleavage of pectin, were predicted. One gene encodes a family PL8 enzyme whereas the second one represents family PL11.

3.2.2. Arabinogalactan

Arabinogalactan (AG) is a polysaccharide consisting of galactose and arabinose residues. AGs are associated with pectin in plant cell walls and occur in two structurally different forms denominated as type I and type II. Two genes encoding endo-β-1,4-galactanase (EC 3.2.1.89) responsible for degradation of AG type I were predicted in the P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T genome. Endo-β-1,4-galactanases act on d-galactosidic linkages in AGs releasing galactotetraose. Moreover, a putative galactan endo-1,6-β-galactosidase (EC 3.2.1.164) was predicted.

3.2.3. Hemicellulose

Hemicellulose is a heteropolymer of the plant cell wall closely associated with cellulose and lignin. It is composed of a variety of polysaccharides derived from sugars such as d-xylose, d-galactose, d-mannose, d-glucose, and l-arabinose. The P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T genome possesses 47 genes encoding enzymes predicted to be responsible for arabinan, xylan, mannan and β-glucan degradation.

Arabinan is a polysaccharide composed of arabinose residues, which are linked by α-1,5 glycosidic bonds in its backbone and α-1,2 and α-1,3 connections in its side chains. The strain M3/6T genome encodes arabinan endo-1,5-α-l-arabinanase (EC 3.2.1.99) that catalyzes the endo-hydrolysis of arabinan into arabinan oligosaccharides, which are further decomposed to l-arabinose residues by α-L-arabinofuranosidase (EC 3.2.1.55). Genes encoding β-l-arabinofuranosidase (EC 3.2.1.185) are also present in the genome. The enzyme hydrolyzes side chain α-(1,2) glycosidic bonds.

Xylan is composed of d-xylose residues. Complete hydrolysis of xylan requires the synergistic action of GH and CE. In strain M3/6T, three of seven enzymes commonly described as enzymes needed for complete xylan hydrolysis were predicted. Acetyl xylan esterase (EC 3.1.1.72) catalyzes release of acetyl groups from polymeric xylan and two other enzymes successively cleave xylose residues from the non-reducing termini of xylan molecules: xylan 1,4-β-xylosidase (EC 3.2.1.37) and xylan 1,3-β-xylosidase (EC 3.2.1.72).

Mannans are polysaccharides composed of mannose, glucose and galactose residues. The strain M3/6T genome harbors genes encoding β-mannanases (EC 3.2.1.78) that hydrolyze linear mannan by randomly cleaving its backbone. (1,4)-β-manno-oligomers are released. The strain may also catalyze cleavage of α-(1-6) mannosidic bonds in unbranched mannan oligossacharides producing mannose residues by a putative endo-1,6-α-mannosidase (EC 3.2.1.101).

β-Glucans are polysaccharides consisting of repeated glucose residues linked by β-1,3 and β-1,4 glycosidic bonds. Hydrolysis of β-glucans is mainly carried out by four types of β-glucanases: β-1,3(4)-glucanase (EC 3.2.1.6), laminarinase (E.C. 3.2.1.39), cellulase (E.C. 3.2.1.4), and lichenase (E.C. 3.2.1.73). The strain M3/6T genome possesses genetic determinants encoding a cellulase and a lichenase. Lichenases catalyze cleavage of β-1-4-d-glucosidic bonds of β-glucans yielding shorter glucans. Subsequently, the resulting glucans can be hydrolyzed by a cellulase releasing glucose units.

3.2.4. Cellulose

Cellulose is the major polysaccharide of plant cell walls consisting of repeated d-glucose residues linked by β-1,4 glycosidic bonds. The P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T genome encodes an endoglucanase (EC 3.2.1.4) that catalyzes the cleavage of β-(1-4) glucosidic bonds releasing cellodextrin, which can be further hydrolyzed by 1,4-β-cellobiosidase (EC 3.2.1.91) producing cellobiose. Subsequently, the latter disaccharide is cleaved into glucose monomers by a β-glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.21).

3.2.5. Chitin

Chitin is frequently considered to represent the second most abundant polysaccharide in nature after cellulose. It is present in several organisms such as shrimps, crabs and insects as well as in the cell walls of fungi, yeast and green algae. The polysaccharide is composed of repeating units of β-(1,4)-linked N-acetyl-β-d-glucosamine. Even if chitin is not present in biogas reactors in high amounts, a total of nine genes encoding putative chitinolytic enzymes were identified in P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T, including a chitinase (EC 3.2.1.14), β-N-acetyl-hexosaminidase (EC 3.2.1.52) and N-acetyl-glucosamine kinase (EC 2.7.1.59). Chitinases act on N-acetyl-β-d-glucosamine in chitin yielding chitodextrins, which can be further hydrolyzed by chitinases releasing chitotriose. Subsequently, chitotriose is hydrolyzed to N,N’-diacetylchitobiose by β-N-acetyl-hexosaminidase, producing N-acetyl-d-glucosamine.

3.2.6. Starch

Starch is the main storage polysaccharide of higher plants. It is a mixture of two polysaccharides, namely α-amylose and amylopectin. α-Amylose consists of several thousand glucose residues commonly connected via α-(1,4) glycosidic bonds. On the other hand, amylopectin is made up of hundreds of shorter linear chains (α-1,4-glucan) with branches of α-(1,6) glycosidic bonds occurring every 24–30 glucose residues. CAZy analyses of the P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T genome revealed seven genes encoding enzymes involved in starch degradation, including α-amylase (EC 3.2.1.1), a putative glucan 1,4-α-glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.3), 4-α-glucanotransferase (EC 2.4.1.25), and glycogen phosphorylase (EC 2.4.1.1). The α-amylase acts on the inner part of the starch chain cleaving α-(1,4) glycosidic linkages to release maltose or maltodextrin. The α-(1,4) and α-(1,6) glycosidic bonds of the external glucose residues of the polysaccharide are cleaved by glucan 1,4-α-glucosidase yielding glucose. 4-α-Glucanotransferase cleaves and transfers an 1,4 glycosidic bond present in maltose to a new position in an acceptor molecule releasing a glucose residue. Finally, α-1,4-glycosidic bonds of maltodextrin are cleaved by glycogen phosphorylase to release glucose residues.

3.2.7. Pullulan

Pullulan is a linear polysaccharide frequently described as repeating unit of maltotriose linked by α-(1,6) glycosidic bonds. Nevertheless, also α-(1,4) linkages can occur. Pullulan is one of the exo-polysaccharides produced by the yeast-like fungus Aureobasidium pullulans [58,59]. Pullulanases are classified according to their substrate specificities and reaction products. There are five groups: pullulanases type I (PULI), pullulanases type II (PULII), amylopullulanase, isopullulanase and neopullulanase [60]. A gene encoding neopullulanase (EC 3.2.1.135) was identified in P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T. The enzyme catalyzes the break-down of α-(1,4) glycosidic linkages in pullulan to produce maltose, glucose and panose as main end-products [61].

3.2.8. Fructan

Fructan is a polysaccharide composed of fructose residues linked by β-(2,1)- or β-(2,6)-glycosidic bonds. Fructan is classified in three types: inulin (linear structure linked by β-(2,1)-glycosidic bonds), levan (linear structure linked by β-(2,6)-glycosidic bonds) and graminan (branched structure linked by β-(2,1)- and β-(2,6)-glycosidic bonds). Analyses indicated that the P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T genome encodes two enzymes involved in fructan degradation, namely fructan β-fructosidase (EC 3.2.1.80) and β-fructofuranosidase (EC 3.2.1.26). Fructan β-fructosidase is able to cleave β-(2,1)- and β-(2,6)-glycosidic bonds in inulin and levan at the non-reducing end releasing sucrose (or fructose residues). The disaccharide sucrose can be hydrolyzed into fructose and glucose by fructofuranosidase. Moreover, thirty-two other genes of strain M3/6T were predicted to encode glycoside hydrolases. These enzymes could not be further specified.

With respect to the increasing demand on microbial capabilities regarding the degradation of organic substrates rich in protein components, additionally the potential of P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T to decompose proteins was also examined based on its functional genome annotation. The proteolytic system of strain M3/6T consists of intracellular and extracellular proteases and transporters (Supplementary file 1: Table S4). The intracellular proteolytic system is composed of Lon- and Clp serine proteases and prolyl oligo-peptidases, which play an essential role in degrading abnormal proteins or proteins participating in regulatory processes. Among the extracellular proteases, strain M3/6T encodes aminopeptidases which are exopeptidases acting on N-terminal amino acid residues from small oligopeptides or proteins. These findings are in accordance with the earlier observation that peptone supports anaerobic growth of P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T [31].

3.3. Polysaccharide utilization loci (PUL)

Polysaccharide utilization loci (PUL) were identified in the genomes of Bacteroidetes members recovered from rumen or human gut samples [[62], [63], [64], [65]]. Commonly, the genes susD and susC are central elements of PUL clusters. They encode an outer membrane glycan binding protein (SusD) and an outer membrane protein (SusC) involved in transfer of the maltooligosaccharide to the periplasmic space for complete degradation [62,63,65,66]. Genes coding for carbohydrate-active enzymes and transcriptional regulators (e.g. HTCS, ECF-σ/Anti-σ regulators, SusR, AraC, GntR and LacI) were frequently located in close proximity to PUL clusters. Corresponding gene products contribute to the transcriptional regulation and functionality of the multi-component complex [67].

In P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T, 64 distinct PUL were identified (Fig. 2). Among them, 38 PUL comprise 115 out of 116 GH genes predicted in the genome of the strain. GHs encoded in PUL represent 33 different CAZyme families. The most frequent ones are GH43 and GH2, indicating that corresponding PUL are mainly dedicated to xylan degradation and metabolism of galactose, respectively. At the example of Gramella flava JLKT2011, a recent study confirmed involvement of PUL and associated GH genes in xylan and homogalacturonan utilization by exploiting multi-omics data [68]. PUL of P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T are also associated with PL, CE and peptidase genes. Likewise, PUL of Prevotella species are linked to peptidase genes, suggesting that the encoded complex is involved in protein degradation and peptide transfer across the membrane [64]. Moreover, 25 PUL of strain M3/6T are linked to transcriptional regulator genes indicating that the encoded regulators are involved in control of PUL expression. Overall, the strain M3/6T seems to be capable to utilize a wide spectrum of complex polysaccharides and proteins.

3.4. Putative fermentation metabolic pathways

P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T encodes a versatile set of carbohydrate-active enzymes indicating that the strain is able to generate energy by fermentation of sugar molecules. To obtain deeper insights into fermentation pathways, the central metabolism of strain M3/6T, was reconstructed from genome sequence data. In this context, also the corresponding transport mechanisms were considered.

In total, 225 genes encoding transporters for amino acids, peptides, monosaccharides, inorganic and metal ions are present in the genome of strain M3/6T. A summary on monosaccharide, amino acid and peptide transporters is given in Supplementary file 2 (Table S1). Five different transporter families encoded in the genome may be involved in uptake of xylose, fucose, arabinose, and maltose. Four other transporter families were predicted to facilitate peptide and/or amino acid transport into the cell.

P. saccharofermentans strain M3/6T is able to ferment a variety of mono- and disaccharides producing carbon dioxide, hydrogen, acetate, formate, propionate and isovalerate as end-products of the fermentation process [31]. Glucose, arabinose, cellobiose, fructose, galactose, lactose, maltose, rhamnose, sucrose, and trehalose were among the substrates that supported growth of strain M3/6T. Except for rhamnose and fucose degradation, all genes encoding relevant enzymes involved in utilization of these simple sugar molecules were predicted (Fig. 3 and Supplementary file 1: Table S5). Moreover, metabolic reconstruction also indicated that strain M3/6T is able to degrade xylose, lyxose, mannose, and melibiose as well as some amino acids (e.g. proline, alanine, asparagine). The majority of metabolites of corresponding degradation pathways are converted to pyruvate, and subsequently yield fermentation end-products (see above and Supplementary file 1: Table S5). Hence, the strain M3/6T is able to produce acids from sugar fermentation suggesting that its function in the biogas production process is associated with the acidogenic phase.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Schematic overview on carbohydrate and protein degradation pathways based on enzymes predicted from the P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T genome sequence. Intracellular and extracellular reactions are separated by the cell envelope. Names in blue denote the hemicellulose polysaccharides. The following intracellular metabolic pathways are shown: glycolysis, pentose phosphate pathway, central pyruvate metabolism and the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA). Arrows symbolize enzymatic reactions. Crossed red arrows mark enzymatic reactions for which corresponding enzymes were not predicted in the P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T genome. Green metabolites represent fermentation pathway end-products (acetate, propionate, isovalerate, formate, and molecular hydrogen). Abbreviations: Asp, aspartic acid; Gln, glutamine; His, histidine; Ile, isoleucine; Leu, leucine; Thr, threonine; Val, valine; OPT, Oligopeptide Transporter Family proteins; ABC, ABC transporter; SSS, Solute-Sodium Symporter Family proteins; MFS, Major Facilitator Superfamily proteins; NP, no prediction.

3.5. P. saccharofermentans M3/6T harbors two CRISPR-cas systems

Bacteriophages and viruses of micro-eukaryotes are considered to represent the most abundant and genetically diverse group on earth [[69], [70], [71]]. Viral infections are responsible for lysis of microbial cells thereby affecting microbial community structures [70,71]. A recent study indicated that phages can affect biogas microbial communities thus causing profound effects on the performance of the anaerobic digestion process [72]. Obtained results suggested that more than 40% of variation within biogas community compositions might be caused by phages.

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR-cas) systems are considered to represent prokaryotic immune systems against foreign DNA molecules and in some cases, also against RNA molecules [[73], [74], [75], [76]]. Briefly, they are composed of a cas operon followed by a leader sequence and arrays of highly conserved short repeat sequences, which are separated by variable sequences (called ‘spacers’) originating from phage or plasmid DNA. Moreover, cas operons are classified in three major types and subtypes according to their architecture [76,77].

P. saccharofermentas strain M3/6T harbors two CRISPR-cas systems (Fig. 3 and Supplementary file S2). The first CRISPR-cas system was classified as type II since it comprises the cas9 gene near cas1 and cas2. A predicted leader region (promoter region) is located downstream of the cas2 gene and features on average an AT-content of 63.3%. The CRISPR array is composed of 39 47-bp direct repeats and 38 spacers of 29–30 bp.

The second CRISPR-cas system belonging to the subtype I-B is composed of an operon of eight genes, a leader region (211 bp featuring an AT-content of 66.98%), and a large CRISPR array of 114 29-bp direct repeats and 113 spacers of 34–39 bp (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

CRISPR-cas systems of the P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T genome. CRISPR-cas system type II-C: cas operon, eight genes (7460 bp); Leader, 109 bp; CRISPR array (2967 bp), 39 47-bp-direct repeats and 38 spacers of 29–30 bp. CRISPR-cas system type I-B: cas operon, eight genes (9131 bp); Leader, 211 bp; CRISPR array (7307 bp), 114 29-bp-direct repeats and 113 spacers of 34–39 bp; Coding sequences (CDS) colored in grey encode hypothetical proteins. The coordinates and sequences of the CRISPR-cas systems are provided as Supplemental material (File S2).

The host retains genome signatures from phages as spacer sequences in CRISPR arrays after phage infection. These can be used to identify corresponding phages based on database searches. All spacer sequences located in P. saccharofermentas str. M3/6T CRISPR arrays were compared against all phage genomes in the NCBI nucleotide sequence database applying the BLASTn-short function (BLAST+package) with an e-value threshold of 1.0 × 10−10. Spacer sequences could not be assigned to any known bacteriophage genome stored in the database indicating that phage diversity is not sufficiently covered in the NCBI database.

3.6. Comparative genomic analyses

The P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T genome was compared to its closest described relative P. acetatigenes str. DSM 18083T that is available in the NCBI nucleotide sequence database.

According to the Integrated Microbial Genomes pipeline (IMG/EM) [78], the strain DSM 18083T is able to degrade the same types of complex carbohydrates and mono- and disaccharides as predicted for strain M3/6T. Genes for utilization of pectin, xylan and pullulan are not present in strain DSM 18083T. Automatic IMG/EM annotation indicated that strain DSM 18083T possesses 90 PUL gene clusters compared to 64 that are present in strain M3/6T. However, both strains are able to degrade β-glycan compounds.

The comparative genomics tool EDGAR [44] was applied to calculate the shared core-genome between P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T and P. acetatigenes str. DSM 18083T. The latter strain was isolated from a reactor treating brewery wastewater (Leibniz-Institute DSMZ GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany), while P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T originates from a biogas reactor. Therefore, both strains were isolated from biotechnological environments. Nothing is known on the occurrence and dissemination of these strains in natural habitats. Moreover, P. acetatigenes str. DSM 18083T and P. saccharofermentans str. M3/6T represent the only types strains of the genus Proteiniphilum. Therefore, comparative genomic analyses are limited. It appeared that both strains share 2482 orthologous genes, representing 73.5% and 68.2% of all genes predicted for strains M3/6T and DSM 18083T, respectively. Moreover, these strains feature an Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) value of 91.4% confirming that these bacteria belong to different species [79].

To complement genomic analyses regarding genome architectures, a synteny plot was calculated. As illustrated in Fig. S1 (Supplementary file S1), there are considerable rearrangements, deletions and insertions within the strain M3/6T genome compared to that of strain DSM 18083T, suggesting that both strains have undergone diverging evolution for a longer period of time probably promoting adaptation to their specific ecological niches. However, these adaptations cannot be completely evaluated due to missing metadata on natural habitats of these Proteiniphilum species.

4. Concluding remarks

Proteiniphilum saccharofermentans str. M3/6T features a versatile metabolism contributing to substrate hydrolysis and acidogenesis within the biogas process as revealed by systematic genome analyses. The strain possesses a set of genes encoding carbohydrate-active enzymes needed for decomposition of pectin, arabinogalactan, hemicellulose (arabinan, xylan, mannan, β-glucans), cellulose, starch, fructan, chitin and pullulan. Most of these genes as well as peptidase genes are associated with PUL, suggesting their involvement in degradation of a broad spectrum of substrates, especially polysaccharides. Metabolites of carbohydrate decomposition feed fermentation pathways finally yielding volatile organic acids. Therefore, this strain is a promising candidate for the development of inoculant cultures regarding enhancement of biomass decomposition, bioaugmentation processes as well as production of volatile organic acids in anaerobic digestion and may also contribute to increased biogas yields.

Finally, two CRISPR-cas systems were detected in the genome of strain M3/6T, indicating that the bacterium possesses protection mechanisms against invasive foreign DNA elements (e.g., phages or plasmids). CRISPR-spacer sequences of M3/6T do not match sequences within databases, indicating that Proteiniphilum phages and/or plasmids are not very well represented in corresponding databases. However, presence of a CRISPR-cas ‘immune system’ may render the strain insensitive towards infections by specific bacteriophages which also has implications on the performance of the strain in anaerobic digestion processes.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they do not have any competing interests.

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted in context of the joint project BIOGAS-CORE granted by the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (grant no. 22017111) and supported by the German Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe. G.T. was supported by grants from São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, proc. Number 2015/23279-6). A.S. gratefully acknowledges funding by the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (FKZ) (grant no. 22404015).

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary material related to this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2018.e00254.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following are Supplementary data to this article:

mmc1.doc (638KB, doc)
mmc2.xlsx (26.8KB, xlsx)

References

  • 1.Holm-Nielsen J.B., Al Seadi T., Oleskowicz-Popiel P. The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresour. Technol. 2009;100:5478–5484. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Weiland P. Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010;85:849–860. doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-2246-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.St-Pierre B., Wright A.-D.G. Comparative metagenomic analysis of bacterial populations in three full-scale mesophilic anaerobic manure digesters. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013;98:2709–2717. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5220-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Li A., Chu Y., Wang X., Ren L., Yu J., Liu X., Yan X., Yan J., Zhang L., Wu S., Li S. A pyrosequencing-based metagenomic study of methane-producing microbial comunity in solid-stat biogas reactor. Biotechnol. Fuels. 2013;6:3. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stolze Y., Zakrzewski M., Maus I., Eikmeyer F., Jaenicke S., Rottmann N., Siebner C., Pühler A., Schlüter A. Comparative metagenomics of biogas-producing microbial communities from production-scale biogas plants operating under wet or dry fermentation conditions. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 2015;8 doi: 10.1186/s13068-014-0193-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Campanaro S., Treu L., Kougias P.G., De Francisci D., Valle G., Angelidaki I. Metagenomic analysis and functional characterization of the biogas microbiome using high throughput shotgun sequencing and a novel binning strategy. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 2016;9:26. doi: 10.1186/s13068-016-0441-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Maus I., Koeck D.E., Cibis K.G. Unraveling the microbiome of a thermophilic biogas plant by metagenome and metatranscriptome analysis complemented by characterization of bacterial and archaeal isolates. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 2016:868–874. doi: 10.1186/s13068-016-0581-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Theuerl S., Kohrs F., Benndorf D., Maus I., Wibberg D., Schlüter A., Kausmann R., Heiermann M., Rapp E., Reichl U., Pühler A., Klocke M. Community shifts in a well-operating agricultural biogas plant: how process variations are handled by the microbiome. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015;99(18) doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6627-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fontana A., Patrone V., Puglisi E., Morelli L., Bassi D., Garuti M., Rossi L., Cappa F. Effects of geographic area, feedstock, temperature, and operating time on microbial communities of six full-scale biogas plants. Bioresour. Technol. 2016;218:980–990. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Stolze Y., Bremges A., Rumming M., Henke C., Maus I., Pühler A., Sczyrba A., Schlüter A. Identification and genome reconstruction of abundant distinct taxa in microbiomes from one thermophilic and three mesophilic production-scale biogas plants. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 2016;9:156. doi: 10.1186/s13068-016-0565-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rainey F.A. vol. 3. Springer; New York: 2009. Class II. Clostridia class. nov. pp. 736–1298. (Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Krieg N.R. vol. 4. Springer; 2010. Phylum XIV. Bacteroidetes phyl. nov; p. 25. (Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Krause L., Diaz N.N., Edwards R.A., Gartemann K.-H., Krömeke H., Neuweger H., Pühler A., Runte K.J., Schlüter A., Stoye J., Szczepanowski R., Tauch A., Goesmann A. Taxonomic composition and gene content of a methane-producing microbial community isolated from a biogas reactor. J. Biotechnol. 2008;136:91–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schlüter A., Bekel T., Diaz N.N., Dondrup M., Eichenlaub R., Gartemann K.-H., Krahn I., Krause L., Krömeke H., Kruse O., Mussgnug J.H., Neuweger H., Niehaus K., Pühler A., Runte K.J., Szczepanowski R., Tauch A., Tilker A., Viehöver P., Goesmann A. The metagenome of a biogas-producing microbial community of a production-scale biogas plant fermenter analysed by the 454-pyrosequencing technology. J. Biotechnol. 2008;136:77–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jaenicke S., Ander C., Bekel T., Bisdorf R., Dröge M., Gartemann K.-H., Jünemann S., Kaiser O., Krause L., Tille F., Zakrzewski M., Pühler A., Schlüter A., Goesmann A. Comparative and joint analysis of two metagenomic datasets from a biogas fermenter obtained by 454-pyrosequencing. PLoS One. 2011;6:e14519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rademacher A., Zakrzewski M., Schlüter A., Schönberg M., Szczepanowski R., Goesmann A., Pühler A., Klocke M. Characterization of microbial biofilms in a thermophilic biogas system by high-throughput metagenome sequencing. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2012;79:785–799. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01265.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hanreich A., Schimpf U., Zakrzewski M., Schlüter A., Benndorf D., Heyer R., Rapp E., Pühler A., Reichl U., Klocke M. Metagenome and metaproteome analyses of microbial communities in mesophilic biogas-producing anaerobic batch fermentations indicate concerted plant carbohydrate degradation. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2013;36:330–338. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2013.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sundberg C., Al-Soud W.A., Larsson M., Alm E., Yekta S.S., Svensson B.H., Sørensen S.J., Karlsson A. 454 pyrosequencing analyses of bacterial and archaeal richness in 21 full-scale biogas digesters. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2013;85:612–626. doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wirth R., Kovács E., Maróti G., Bagi Z., Rákhely G., Kovács K.L. Characterization of a biogas-producing microbial community by short-read next generation DNA sequencing. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 2012;5:41. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-5-41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Treu L., Kougias P.G., Campanaro S., Bassani I., Angelidaki I. Deeper insight into the structure of the anaerobic digestion microbial community: the biogas microbiome database is expanded with 157 new genomes. Bioresour. Technol. 2016;216:260–266. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pop M. Genome assembly reborn: recent computational challenges. Brief. Bioinform. 2009;10:354–366. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbp026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nielsen H.B., Almeida M., Juncker A.S., Rasmussen S., Li J., Sunagawa S. Identification and assembly of genomes and genetic elements in complex metagenomic samples without using reference genomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014;32:822–828. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Clemente J.C., Pehrsson E.C., Blaser M.J., Sandhu K., Gao Z., Wang B., Magris M., Hidalgo G., Contreras M., Noya-alarcón Ó., Lander O., Mcdonald J., Cox M., Walter J., Oh P.L., Ruiz J.F., Rodriguez S., Shen N., Song S.J., Metcalf J. The microbiome of uncontacted amerindians. Sci Adv. 2015;1(April (3)):e1500183. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mondav R., Woodcroft B.J., Kim E.-H., McCalley C.K., Hodgkins S.B., Crill P.M., Chanton J., Hurst G.B., VerBerkmoes N.C., Saleska S.R., Hugenholtz P., Rich V.I., Tyson G.W. Discovery of a novel methanogen prevalent in thawing permafrost. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:1–7. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.White R.A., III, Bottos E.M., Chowdhury T.R., Zucker J.D., Brislawn C.J., Nicora C.D., Fansler S.J., Glaesemann K.R., Glass K., Jansson J.K. Moleculo long-read sequencing facilitates assembly and genomic binning from complex soil metagenomes. mSystems. 2016;1:1–15. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00045-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Satinsky B.M., Fortunato C.S., Doherty M., Smith C.B., Sharma S., Ward N.D., Krusche A.V., Yager P.L., Richey J.E., Moran M.A., Crump B.C. Metagenomic and metatranscriptomic inventories of the lower Amazon River, May 2011. Microbiome. 2015;3:39. doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0099-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Koeck D.E., Wibberg D., Koellmeier T., Blom J., Jaenicke S., Winkler A., Albersmeier A., Zverlov V.V., Pühler A., Schwarz W.H., Schlüter A. Draft genome sequence of the cellulolytic Clostridium thermocellum wild-type strain BC1 playing a role in cellulosic biomass degradation. J. Biotechnol. 2013;168:62–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tomazetto G., Hahnke S., Maus I., Wibberg D., Pühler A., Schlüter A., Klocke M. Complete genome sequence of Peptoniphilus sp. strain ING2-D1G isolated from a mesophilic lab-scale completely stirred tank reactor utilizing maize silage in co-digestion with pig and cattle manure for biomethanation. J. Biotechnol. 2014;192:59–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hahnke S., Maus I., Wibberg D., Tomazetto G., Pühler A., Klocke M., Schlüter A. Complete genome sequence of the novel Porphyromonadaceae bacterium strain ING2-E5B isolated from a mesophilic lab-scale biogas reactor. J. Biotechnol. 2015;193:34–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Koeck D.E., Maus I., Wibberg D., Winkler A., Zverlov V.V., Liebl W., Pühler A., Schwarz W.H., Schlüter A. Draft genome sequence of Herbinix hemicellulosilytica T3/55T, a new thermophilic cellulose degrading bacterium isolated from a thermophilic biogas reactor. J. Biotechnol. 2015;214 doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hahnke S., Langer T., Koeck D.E., Klocke M. Description of Proteiniphilum saccharofermentans sp. nov., Petrimonas mucosa sp. nov. and Fermentimonas caenicola gen. nov., sp. nov. isolated from mesophilic lab-scale biogas reactors and emended description of the genus Proteiniphilum. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016:1–10. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gordon D., Abajian C., Green P. Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 1998;8:195–202. doi: 10.1101/gr.8.3.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tomazetto G., Hahnke S., Koeck D.E., Wibberg D., Maus I., Pühler A., Klocke M., Schlüter A. Complete genome analysis of Clostridium bornimense strain M2/40T: a new acidogenic Clostridium species isolated from a mesophilic two-phase laboratory-scale biogas reactor. J. Biotechnol. 2016;232 doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Meyer F., Goesmann A., McHardy A.C., Bartels D., Bekel T., Clausen J., Kalinowski J., Linke B., Rupp O., Giegerich R., Pühler A. GenDB—an open source genome annotation system for prokaryote genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:2187–2195. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lagesen K., Hallin P., Rødland E.A., Stærfeldt H.H., Rognes T., Ussery D.W. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:3100–3108. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Suzek B.E., Ermolaeva M.D., Schreiber M., Salzberg S.L. A probabilistic method for identifying start codons in bacterial genomes. Bioinformatics. 2001;17:1123–1130. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lowe T.M., Eddy S.R. tRNAscan-SE: a program for inproved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Petersen T.N., Brunak S., Von Heijne G., Nielsen H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat. Methods. 2011;8:785–786. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1701. Nat. Publ. Gr. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Krogh A., Larsson B., von Heijne G., Sonnhammer E.L. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden markov model: application to complete genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 2001;305:567–580. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhou Y., Liang Y., Lynch K.H., Dennis J.J., Wishart D.S. PHAST: a fast phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:1–6. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dhillon B.K., Laird M.R., Shay J.A., Winsor G.L., Lo R., Nizam F., Pereira S.K., Waglechner N., McArthur A.G., Langille M.G.I., Brinkman F.S.L. Island viewer 3: more flexible, interactive genomic island discovery, visualization and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:104–108. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Grissa I., Vergnaud G., Pourcel C. CRISPRFinder: a web tool to identify clustered regulary interspaced short palindromic repeats. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:52–57. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Grissa I., Vergnaud G., Pourcel C. The CRISPRdb database and tools to display CRISPRs and to generate dictionaries of spacers and repeats. BMC Bioinform. 2007;8:172. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Blom J., Albaum S.P., Doppmeier D., Pühler A., Vorhölter F.-J., Zakrzewski M., Goesmann A. EDGAR: a software framework for the comparative analysis of prokaryotic genomes. BMC Bioinform. 2009;10:154. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yin Y., Mao X., Yang J., Chen X., Mao F., Xu Y. dbCAN: a web resource for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:W445–51. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Finn R.D., Clements J., Eddy S.R. HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:W29–37. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Claudel-Renard C., Chevalet C., Faraut T., Kahn D. Enzyme-specific profiles for genome annotation: PRIAM. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:6633–6639. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Karp P.D., Paley S.M., Krummenacker M., Latendresse M., Dale J.M., Lee T.J., Kaipa P., Gilham F., Spaulding A., Popescu L., Altman T., Paulsen I., Keseler I.M., Caspi R. Pathway tools version 13.0: integrated software for pathway/genome informatics and systems biology. Brief. Bioinform. 2009;11:40–79. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbp043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Saier M.H., Reddy V.S., Tsu B.V., Ahmed M.S., Li C., Moreno-Hagelsieb G. The transporter classification database (TCDB): recent advances. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D372–D379. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wilkinson R., Wiedenheft B. A CRISPR method for genome engineering. F1000Prime Rep. 2014;6:3. doi: 10.12703/P6-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Doi R.H. Cellulases of mesophilic microorganisms: cellulosome and noncellulosome producers. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008;1125:267–279. doi: 10.1196/annals.1419.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Koeck D.E., Pechtl A., Zverlov V.V., Schwarz W.H. Genomics of cellulolytic bacteria. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014;29C:171–183. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zverlov V.V., Schwarz W.H. Bacterial cellulose hydrolysis in anaerobic environmental subsystems—Clostridium thermocellum and Clostridium stercorarium, thermophilic plant-fiber degraders. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008;1125:298–307. doi: 10.1196/annals.1419.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Klocke B., Mundt M., Sontag K., Schönberg M., Linke M. Microbial community structures within a two-stage biogas reactor system with bioleaching of rye silage. In: Leibniz-Institut Potsdam-Bornim, editor. Wieviel Biogas steckt in Pflanzen? Öffentliches Abschlusssymposium zu den Forschungsergebnissen des “Biogas-Crops-Network” (BCN) Leibniz-Institut für Agrartechnik; Potsdam-Bornim: 2009. pp. 126–139. (ISSN: 0947–7314) [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kampmann K., Ratering S., Kramer I., Schmidt M., Zerr W., Schnell S. Unexpected stability of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes communities in laboratory biogas reactors fed with different defined substrates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012;78:2106–2119. doi: 10.1128/AEM.06394-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Rademacher A., Nolte C., Schönberg M., Klocke M. Temperature increases from 55 to 75 °C in a two-phase biogas reactor result in fundamental alterations within the bacterial and archaeal community structure. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012;96:565–576. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4348-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Cantarel B.I., Coutinho P.M., Rancurel C., Bernard T., Lombard V., Henrissat B. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:233–238. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Singh R.S., Saini G.K. Pullulan-hyperproducing color variant strain of Aureobasidium pullulans FB-1 newly isolated from phylloplane of Ficus sp. Bioresour. Technol. 2008;99:3896–3899. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Singh R.S., Singh H., Saini G.K. Response surface optimization of the critical medium components for pullulan production by Aureobasidium pullulans FB-1. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2009;152:42–53. doi: 10.1007/s12010-008-8180-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hii S.L., Tan J.S., Ling T.C., Bin Ariff A. Pullulanase: role in starch hydrolysis and potential industrial applications. Enzyme Res. 2012;2012 doi: 10.1155/2012/921362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Imanaka T., Kuriki T. Pattern of action of Bacillus stearothermophilus neopullulanase on pullulan. J. Bacteriol. 1989;171:369–374. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.1.369-374.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Naas A.E., Mackenzie A.K., Mravec J., Schückel J., Willats W.G.T., Eijsink V.G.H., Pope P.B. Do rumen Bacteroidetes utilize an alternative mechanism for cellulose degradation? MBio. 2014;5:4–9. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01401-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Rosewarne C.P., Pope P.B., Cheung J.L., Morrison M. Analysis of the bovine rumen microbiome reveals a diversity of Sus-like polysaccharide utilization loci from the bacterial phylum Bacteroidetes. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014;41:601–606. doi: 10.1007/s10295-013-1395-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Accetto T., Avgustin G. Polysaccharide utilization locus and CAZYme genome repertoires reveal diverse ecological adaptation of Prevotella species. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2015;38:453–461. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2015.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Mackenzie A.K., Naas A.E., Kracun S.K., Schückel J., Fangel J.U., Agger J.W., Willats W.G.T., Eijsink V.G.H., Pope P.B. A polysaccharide utilization locus from an uncultured Bacteroidetes phylotype suggests ecological adaptation and substrate versatility. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;81:187–195. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02858-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Martens E.C., Koropatkin N.M., Smith T.J., Gordon J.I. Complex glycan catabolism by the human gut microbiota: the Bacteroidetes sus-like paradigm. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:24673–24677. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R109.022848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Martens E.C., Lowe E.C., Chiang H., Pudlo N.A., Wu M., Nathan P., Abbott D.W., Henrissat B., Gilbert H.J., Bolam D.N., Gordon J.I. Recognition and degradation of plant cell wall polysaccharides by two human gut symbionts. PLoS Biol. 2011;9 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Tang K., Lin Y., Han Y., Jiao N. Characterization of potential polysaccharide utilization systems in the marine Bacteroidetes Gramella flava JLT2011 using a multi-omics approach. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8:1–13. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Weitz J.S., Poisot T., Meyer J.R., Flores C.O., Valverde S., Sullivan M.B., Hochberg M.E. Phage-bacteria infection networks. Trends Microbiol. 2013;21:82–91. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2012.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Pratama A.A., van Elsas J.D. The “Neglected” soil virome—potential role and impact. Trends Microbiol. 2018:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Tikhe C.V., Husseneder C. Metavirome sequencing of the termite gut reveals the presence of an unexplored bacteriophage community. Front. Microbiol. 2018;8:1–16. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Zhang J., Gao Q., Zhang Q., Wang T., Yue H., Wu L., Shi J., Qin Z., Zhou J., Zuo J., Yang Y. Bacteriophage-prokaryote dynamics and interaction within anaerobic digestion processes across time and space. Microbiome. 2017;5:57. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0272-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Jansen R., Van Embden J.D.A., Gaastra W., Schouls L.M. Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes. Mol. Microbiol. 2002;43:1565–1575. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02839.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Bolotin A., Quinquis B., Sorokin A., Ehrlich S.D. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats (CRISPRs) have spacers of extrachromosomal origin. Microbiology. 2005:2551–2561. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.28048-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Gasiunas G., Sinkunas T., Siksnys V. Molecular mechanisms of CRISPR-mediated microbial immunity. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2014;71:449–465. doi: 10.1007/s00018-013-1438-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Makarova K.S., Wolf Y.I., Alkhnbashi O.S., Costa F., Shah S.A., Saunders S.J., Barrangou R., Brouns S.J.J., Charpentier E., Haft D.H., Horvath P., Moineau S., Mojica F.J.M., Terns R.M., Terns M.P., White M.F., Yakunin A.F., Garrett R.A., van der Oost J., Backofen R., Koonin E.V. An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2015;13:722–736. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3569. Nat. Publ. Gr. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Makarova K.S., Brouns S.J.J., Horvath P., Sas D.F., Wolf Y.I. Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012;9:467–477. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Markowitz V.M., Chen I.-M., Chu K., Szeto E., Palaniappan K., Grechkin Y., Ratner A., Jacob B., Pati A., Huntemann M., Liolios K., Pagani I., Anderson I., Mavromatis K., Ivanova N.N., Kyrpides N.C. IMG/M: the integrated metagenome data management and comparative analysis system. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;40:123–129. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Konstantinidis K.T., Tiedje J.M. Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005;102:2567–2572. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409727102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Maus I., Bremges A., Stolze Y., Hahnke S., Cibis K.G., Koeck D.E., Kim Y.S., Kreubel J., Hassa J., Wibberg D., Weimann A., Off S., Stantscheff R., Zverlov V.V., Schwarz W.H., König H., Liebl W., Scherer P., McHardy A.C., Sczyrba A., Klocke M., Pühler A., Schlüter A. Genomics and prevalence of bacterial and archaeal isolates from biogas-producing microbiomes. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 2018;10(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s13068-017-0947-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.doc (638KB, doc)
mmc2.xlsx (26.8KB, xlsx)

Articles from Biotechnology Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES